Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Evaluation of Aquifer Parameters by Pumping Tests L. Elango

1

When We Pump A Well Where Does the Water Come From?
Storage coefficient or storativity (S) volume of water that a permeable unit will absorb or expel from storage per unit surface area per unit change in head

An

na

U
Unconfined System Drainage of the Pores Specific Yield
2
Elango L

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Confined System
If potentiometric surface changes, ater ill water will be e pelled or expelled stored

But Pores aren’t Draining?

Where is the Water Coming From? 3

An
Think of a Tire System is Elastic Filled with air under pressure we release it it is still filled with air Skeleton If pressure increases, Mineral skeleton will expand Water will contract Water

na

U

ni

ve
P
If pressure drops, p p , Mineral skeleton will contract Water will expand

rs

ity
P
Expansion of Water Compaction of the Aquifer Skeleton 4

When Pumping
Reduce the Pressure

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Specific Storage (Ss)
elastic storage coefficient amount of water per unit volume of a saturated formation that is stored or expelled from storage owing to compressibility of the mineral skeleton and pore water per unit head change

Ss = ρwg(α + nβ)
ρw = density of water g = acceleration of gravity α = compressibility of aquifer skeleton n = porosity β = compressibility of water 5

Storage Coefficient
The storage coefficient (S) consists of two components: pore fluid draining of the aquifer water released from compressibility of aquifer For confined aquifers, there is no draining of the pores, so all storage comes from the compressibility component Ss = specific storage (1/L) b = saturated thickness (L) S < 0.005 For F unconfined aquifers, most of the water is from draining, fi d if t f th t i f d i i contribution from compressibility is very small in comparison S = Ssb S = Sy + Ssb usually, Sy >> Ssb S ~ Sy Sy = specific yield b = saturated thickness (L) Ss = specific storage (1/L) S: 0.02 to 0.30

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

6

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

What is drawdown?
Piezometer t=0 t>0

7

Groundwater Movement - Cone of Depression

(from Keller, 2000, Figure 10.10)
Water table

flow flow Cone of depression

Pumping water from a well causes a cone of depression to form in the water table at the well site. S. Hughes, 2003 8

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Cone of Depression

9

An

na

U

ni
Plan View
Axi symmetric flow

ve

rs

ity

Well

10

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Drawdown cones at a given time

Freeeze and Cherry 1979

11

Aquifer Parameters
• Storage coefficient or storativity volume of water that a permeable unit will absorb or expel from storage per unit surface area per unit change in head.

• Transmissivity - the amount of water y

that can be transmitted horizontally by the full-saturated thickness of the aquifer under a hydraulic gradient of 1.
12

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Steady and Unsteady Flow
• Steady Flow – variation in head w.r.t time is Zero • Unsteady – head varies with time
99.55 99.6 99.65 99.7 99 99.75 99.8 99.85 99.9 99.95 100 100.05 0 1000 2000 3000 Time

Equilibrium

Drawdown

4000

5000

6000

13

Groundwater Flow Equation
• Consider a small volume of the aquifer, called a control volume. • The three sides are of length dx,dy and dz respectively respectively. • Area of the faces normal to the xaxis is dydz
14

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

The inflow and outflow components in the X direction can be stated as
⎛ ∂h ⎞ ⎛ ∂h ⎞ q x ,i = −T z W ⎜ ⎟ and qx ,o = −Tx W ⎜ ⎟ d z z x ⎝ ∂x ⎠ ⎝ ∂x ⎠ o i

Tx is the Transmissivity in the x direction, W is the length of a side of the square, (δh/δx)i and (δh/δx)o define the hydraulic gradient at the entry and exit faces
15

The flow rate or released in the element as a result of these flows, by continuity, equals

(q x,i − q x,o ) + (q y ,i − q y ,o ) = − SW 2 ∂h
∂t

S - storage coefficient g

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

16

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Substituting the values of q
⎛ ∂h ⎞ ⎛ ∂h ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ −⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ∂x ⎠ i ⎝ ∂x ⎠ o − Tx − Ty W ⎛ ∂h ⎞ ⎛ ∂h ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ −⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂y ⎟ ⎜ ∂y ⎟ ∂h ⎝ ⎠i ⎝ ⎠o = −S W ∂t

If the value of W becomes infinitesimally small, the derivatives on the left hand side become the second derivatives of h, so

Tx

∂ 2h ∂x 2

+ Ty

∂ 2h ∂y 2
rs ity

=S

∂h ∂t
17

Extending this as a 3 D equation
Kx ∂ 2h ∂x 2 +Ky ∂ 2h ∂y 2 + Kz ∂ 2h ∂z 2 = Ss ∂h ∂t
S=Ss W

If the flow is steady, δh/δt = 0; therefore,

K xx

∂ 2h ∂x
2

An
∂2h ∂y
2

na

U

ni
+ K yy + K zz ∂ 2h ∂z
2

ve

=0

18

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

For homogenous and isotropic aquifers
∂ 2h ∂x 2 + ∂ 2h ∂y 2 + ∂ 2h ∂z 2 = 0 K

This is known as Laplace equation

19

The Flow Equation (cont.)
Flow Equation Simplifications
0 0

Steady State Flow Equation y q
If inflow = out flow, Net inflow = 0 Change in storage = 0

Two dimensional flow equation
Horizontal flow (Dupuit assumption) Thus: dh/dz = 0

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

2-D, horizontally isotropic flow equation
Kx=Ky=Kh T=Kh b units: [L2/T], S=Ss b Ah: horizontal area of recharge Ss/Kh=S/T hydraulic diffusivity

0

0

Isotropic, 2-D, steady state flow equation (without source term), Laplace Equation

20

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

In polar coordinates
Unsteady Radial Flow the equation for confined flow is

21

Unsteady Radial Flow the equation for unconfined flow is

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

22

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Pumping Tests
• Estimate transmissivity T and storativity S in the field • Pumping a well • Measure drawdown in observation wells near the pumping well • Relation among discharge, drawdown and time help to determine aquifer parameters • Also known as ‘Well hydraulics’
23

AxiAxi-symmetric Flow
• STEADY RADIAL FLOW (Equilibrium)
– Confined Aquifer q – Unconfined Aquifer
- well pumped at constant rate - equilibrium (no change in head with time)

• UNSTEADY RADIAL FLOW (Non equilibrium flow/ Transient)
– Confined Aquifer – Unconfined Aquifer

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

24

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

STEADY RADIAL FLOW

Confined Aquifer
• After a long time, drawdown approaches an equilibrium value. value • Derive a expression for transmissivity as a function of Q and h measured at two observation wells. • Dupit assumptions (a) the hydraulic gradient is equal to the slope of the water di i l h l f h table and (b) for small water-table gradients, waterthe stream-lines are horizontal and the streamequipotential lines are vertical.
25

Dupuit Assumptions
For unconfined ground water flow Dupuit developed th d l d a theory that allows for a simple th t ll f i l solution based off the following assumptions: 1) The water table or free surface is only slightly inclined 2) St Streamlines may b considered h i t l li be id d horizontal and equipotential lines, vertical 3) Slopes of the free surface and hydraulic gradient are equal

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

26

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

STEADY RADIAL FLOW

Confined Aquifer
Cone of Depression
s = drawdown

Q

h

r

27

From Darcy’s law for horizontal flow, Q at any radius r equals,

Integrating after separation of variables, with h = h1 at r = r1 at the well, yields

An

na
Derivation

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

28

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

The formula is...

Q r2 T= ln( ) 2π (h2 − h1 ) r1
This is known as Thiem Eqn 29

STEADY RADIAL FLOW

Unconfined Aquifer

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

30

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Derivation of equation

31

The formula is...

For steady state conditions we can NOT determine storativity of aquifer as hydraulic head does not change with time
32

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

• Advantages: T (or K) determination quite accurate ( (compared to transient methods) p ) • Disadvantages: need 2 observation wells, can’t get storativity S • may require very long term pumping to reach steady-state
33

UNSTEADY RADIAL FLOW

Pumping Tests in an Ideal Confined Aquifer
Theis (1935) Solution

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

34

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Determining T and S from Pumping Test Data
Non N equilibrium equation is ilib i ti i advantageous Value of S can be determined One observation well is required Shorter period of pumping However the assumptions!!
35

Assumptions: • full penetration of aquifer and radial flow, • homogeneous and isotropic, y • Pizometric surface is horizontal that is steady state system prior to pumping, • constant density and viscosity of water, • pumping well of infinitesimal diameter and 100% efficient • horizontal flow and Darcy's law valid • potentiometric surface initially horizontal and any changes due to pumping of well, • aquifer horizontal, infinite in horizontal extent and bounded on bottom by confining layer
36

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Theis Method
Q = pumping rate

t=0 t>0 Confined Aquifer Impermeable above and below aquifer
37

• The governing ground water flow equation for h in plane polar coordinates is:
∂2h/∂ r2 + (1/r)(∂h/∂r) = (S/T)(∂h/∂t)

where: r = radial distance from well S = storage coefficient and coefficient, T = transmissivity RHS = transient term of storage
38

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

visualaquifer.htm

http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/classe s/geol552/pumptest/visualaquifer.ht m 39

Theis Equation

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Q e h0 − h = du ∫ ud 4π T u
Theis equation is written as W(u) and is known as the exponential integral or well function,

−u

Q h0 − h = W ( u) 4π T

r2S u= 4Tt
40

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Q h0 − h = W ( u) 4π T
well function W(u) can be expanded as infinite series

W(u) = – 0.5772 – ln(u) + u – u2/2·2! + u3/3·3! – u4/4·4! + ..

41

• • • • •

Drawdown, (h0 - h) Drawdown Pumping rate, Q Transmissivity, T Storativity, S Radial distance between pumping and observation wells, r
42

Elango L

An

Theis Solution

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Pumping Tests for T and S
• Measure drawdown due to the pumping well in nearby observation wells. Get t vs s data • Use graphical techniques or approximations to measure T and S. S

43

Theis Method of Solution...

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Q h0 − h = W ( u) 4π T
s = (Q/4πT)W(u) r2/t = (4T/S)u

r2S u= 4Tt

The relationship between W(u) and u must be the same as that between s and r2/t because all other terms are constants. - therefore, plot of the following will be similar: W(u) vs. u, and s vs. r2/t
44

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Estimating T and S using Theis
1 Construct a plot of W(u) versus u on loglog-log paper. 2 Plot drawdown measurements on paper of same scale. 3 Match the data to the type curve. h h d h

45

...T and S from Theis
1 Select a match point (normally W(u) = 1/u = 1. 2 Find values of drawdown and time that correspond to the match point. 3 S l f T and S with Theis solution. Solve for d ih h i l i

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

46

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Theis Type Curve and Field Data
Data Pts Well Fcn

47

Rearrange and solve for T:

Q T= W ( u) 4π (h0 − h)
4Tt Ttu S= 2 r
48

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Example Problem
• A well in a confined aquifer was pumped at a rate of 1000L/min for 500 minutes. The aquifer is 15 m thick and the observation well is 250 m from the pumping well. Find T K, and S. well T, K S

49

Drawdown Data from an Observation Well 250 m from the Pumping Well P mping
10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 1 10 Time (min) 100 1000

Dra awdown (m)

An

Example Data

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

50

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Theis Type Curve
Theis Type Curve
10 1 W(u) 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.1 1 10 1/u 100 1000

51

Match the data to the type curve.
Theis Type Curve
10 1 W(u) 0.1

10 1 0.1

0.01 0.01 0.001 0.001 1 0.1 10 100 100 1000 1000

An
1 10 1/u

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

52

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Match the data to the type curve.
Theis Type Curve
10 1 W(u) 0.1

10 1 0.1

0.7 m 4 mins
1

0.01 0.01 0.001 0.001 1 0.1

10

10 1/u

100 100

1000 1000

53

• Recall Q = 1000L/min. 1000L/min • r = 250 m. • Match point values are W(u) = 1, 1/u = 1, h0 - h = 0.7 m, and t = 4 minutes. i

An

Calculations

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

54

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Recall...

Q T= W ( u) 4π (h0 − h)
4Ttu S= 2 r
55

Values of T, K, and S are
• T = 0.11 m2/min 0 11 /min. • K = T/b = 7.3 x 10-3 m/min. • S = 2.8 x 10-5

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

56

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

CooperCooper-Jacob Straight-Line StraightMethod
• Approximation of Theis technique. technique • Applies to long time data. • Represent W(u) by an infinite series.

57

W(u) as an Infinite Series

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

58

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

W(u) as an Infinite Series

Truncate the Series - OK for longer times. u < 0.01

ho - h =

Q (- 0.5772 - ln(u)) 4ΠT
59

An

na

Simplify

U

ni

ve

rs

ity
-u = ln(1/u) ln 1.78=0.5772

h0 − h =

Q ⎛ 4 Tt ⎞ ( − ln 1 . 78 + ln ⎜ 2 ⎟ ) 4π T ⎝r S ⎠ Q 4 Tt ⎛ ⎞ h0 − h = ln ⎜ ⎟ 4π T 1 . 78 r 2 S ⎠ ⎝

h0 − h =

2 .3Q ⎛ 2 . 25 Tt ⎞ log ⎜ ⎟ 2 4π T ⎝ r S ⎠
60

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Use t0 (time for which drawdown = 0), to estimate S.

2.3Q 2.25Tt ho - h = log ( 2 ) \ l 4πT r S
So, since log(1) = 0, rearrangement yields

2.25Tt 2 25Tt o r 2S

= 1 or S =
ity

2.25Tt 2 25Tt o r2
61

h0 − h =

2.3Q ⎛ 2.25T ⎞ (log⎜ 2 ⎟ + log t ) 4πT ⎝ r S ⎠

Similar to equation of straight line Plot of s Vs log t a forms straight line T = 2.3Q/4π ∆s ∆s is the drawdown difference per unit log p g cycle of t First solve for T and then for S and is only applicable for small values of u < 0.01
62

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Plot data on appropriate axes.
Data For Jacob Method
Tim e (m in) 1 0 0.5 Draw wdown (m) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 10 100 1000

63

Find Δ(h0-h) (1 log cycle)
Data For Jacob Method
Tim e (m in) 1 0 0.5 Draw wdown (m) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 10 100 1000

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

64

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Δ(h0-h) = 2.1 - 0.4 = 1.7 m
Now find t0, where drawdown = 0.

65

Measurement of t0
Tim t0 = 7 mins. e (m in) mins 1 0 0.5 Draw wdown (m) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 10

An
Data For Jacob Method
100 1000

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

66

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Calculation of T, K and S

2.3Q w T= 4πΔ(H − h )
67

Finally Calculate S

An

S =

na

U

2.25Tt 2 25T o r2

ni

ve

rs

ity

68

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Chow Method
• • • • Relation between F(u), u and W(u) Choose a pt. note t and s Find Δs • F (u) = s/Δs • For F(u) get u & W(u)
1 10 0 1 2 3 0.5 1.5 2.5 Drawdown (m) 3.5

D For JacobM ata ethod
Tim (m e in) 100 1000

Q h0 − h = W ( u) 4π T

u=

r2S 4Tt

69

• That we can also determine T & S with r vs s data also!

An

Remember …

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

70

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Theis recovery method

http://www.nyecounty.com/RID_data/rid4802.pdf

71

• Well pumped for a given time t • Recovery data can then be collected • Residual drawdown s’

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

72

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Plot f ’ d log / ’ Pl of s’ and l t/t’ – straight line i h li

73

Radial Flow in a Leaky Aquifer
• Leaky aquifers are complex because when they are pumped, water is withdrawn from both the lower aquifer and from the saturated portion of the overlying aquitard. • By creating a lowered piezometric surface below the i i f b l h water table, ground water can migrate vertically downward and than move horizontally to the well 74

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Radial Flow in a Leaky Aquifer
• When pumping starts from a well in a leaky aquifer, drawdown of the piezometric surface can be given by: s' = (Q/4πT)W(u,r/B) where the quantity r/B is given by: r/B = r/ T/(K' / b') where: T is transmissivity of the aquifer i t i i it f th if K' is vertical hydraulic conductivity b' is the thickness of the aquitard W leaky well function tabulated in books
Hantush and Jacob (1955) 75

• – Theis solution assumes all pumped water comes from aquifer storage (ideal aquifer) – additional water can enter such systems via leakage from lower-permeability bounding materials or surface water bodies. • This lowers the drawdown vs. time curve below vs the classic Theis curve • Assumptions: as in Theis solution, plus vertical-only flow in the aquitard (i.e. leakage only moves vertically), no drawdown in un pumped aquifer, no contribution from storage in aquitard

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

76

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

• Values of the function W(u, r/B) have been given for various r/B to create a family of type curves

77

• This method of solution for the leaky aquifer is similar to the Theis method, except for W( /B) t f W(u,r/B)
– A curve of best fit is selected and values of W, 1/u, s', and t are found, which allows T and S to be determined. This makes it possible to calculate K' and b'. – M h d i rarely used i practice since the Method is l d in i i h assumptions are often violated in the field. – Better to use a numerical model (MODFLOW) that can handle variations more accurately. 78

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Unconfined Aquifer
• Have both radial (horizontal) and vertical flow. • Drawdown the water table. • Drain pores.

Unsteady Flow

79

Pumping from an Unconfined Aquifer
Q

An

na

U

ni

ve
at t = 0. t>0 Impermeable Base
80
Elango L

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Three Distinct Stages of Drawdown
Assumption of horizontal-only flow is violated for unconfined aquifers 1. at early stages of pumping, the water table changes little, and the p q , drawdown responds as a Theis curve for confined aquifer, with storage in the aquifer equal to specific storage ( Ss) 2. when the drawdown cone is sufficiently deep, vertical flow to the well occurs and gravity-assisted drainage decreases the drawdown 3. at late stages the drawdown follows a Theis curve, but storage g Theis (S) is equal to specific yield Theis (Sy) (Sy), i.e. provided by gravity 3 2 drainage ho - h

1 time

81

Neuman (1975) Solution

Q h0 − h = W (uA, uB, Γ ) 4πT

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

82

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

r S uA = 4Tt r Sy uB = 4Tt
2

2

Γ = r2Kv / b2Kh
b – saturated thickness of aquifer Kh, Kv - Horizontal and vertical K

83

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

84

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Other methods
• • • • • • Partially P ti ll penetrating wells t ti ll Wells near barrier boundaries Multiple wells Large diameter wells g Trenches ……………………
85

Advantages of Pumping Tests
• Meas re parameters i situ Measure in it • Average parameters over a large volume • Measure T and S simultaneously.

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

86

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Disadvantages of Pumping Tests
High cost Time consuming Not possible to satisfy the assumptions Non-uniqueness of T and S results Disposal of potentially contaminated Di l f t ti ll t i t d water? • Possibility of contamination.
87

• • • • •

Slug or Bail Tests: Alternatives to Pumping Tests
• • • • • No pumping req ired p mping required Only need one well Easy to add a solid slug to a well Measure time required to recover Rate of recovery is proportional to K
88

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Slug Tests
Slug tests are conducted by “instantaneously” raising or lowering the water level in a well and monitoring the recovery of the water level Often accomplished by dropping a long object into the well to displace the water – Forward Test
Initial condition t=0 t = t1 t = t2 t = t3

89

Forward Slug Test – Insert the Slug

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

90

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Reverse Test – Pull the Slug

91

Cooper – Bredehoeft - Papadopulos
solution for a slug test in a confined aquifer by curve matching

Displace water using a slug Instantaneous rise in water level H0 = maximum rise in water level H = height above static water level Measure H with respect to time 92

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Plot H/H0 (arithmetic) verses time (log) Match Data to Type Curves Keep H/H0 axes coincident p Shift Horizontally Select a match point for the value of t1 at the point where Tt/r2 = 1

T=

rc2 t1

S = (rc2u)/rs2

Curves for small values of u look very similar and should be used with caution Fully penetrating confined system 93

Hvorslev Slug Test Method
Plot of log H/H0 vs time (arithmetic) Fit Straight Line to Data Determine T0 for H/H0 = .37

K=

r2ln(Le/R) 2LeT0

K = hydraulic conductivity r = radius of well casing R = radius of well screen Le = length of well screen Unconfined or Confined 94

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Fetter, Applied Hydrogeology 4th Edition

Figure 5.21. Piezometer geometry for Hvorslev method. Note that for a piezometer installed in a lowpermeability unit the value R is the radius of the highest permeable zone that includes the gravel pack zone and 95 L is the length of the gravel pack zone.

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

96

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Bouwer and Rice Method
Intended for unconfined systems

K = hydraulic conductivity rc = radius of the well casing R = radius of gravel pack Re = effective radial distance over which head is dissipated Le = length of screen H0 = drawdown at time t = 0 Ht = drawdown at time t t = time since test began 97

Partially Penetrating

Fully Penetrating

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

98

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Gravel Pack K

Plot Ht (log) vs time (arithmetic) Fit Straight Line to Middle Data Choose point on line for t Ht Ch i t li f t,

99

Step Drawdown Test

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

10

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Step drawdown test for well efficiency

10

Well Efficiency

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

10

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Well Skin Effects Well Installation can produce low K skin Slug test will be influenced by the skin K Critical to develop the well - Purge and surge Slug Test Guidelines 1. Three or more slug tests should be performed in each well 2. Two or more initial displacements should be used 3. Introduce slug near instantaneously 4. 4 Log sampling – pressure transducer

10

• All the methods can be performed using commercially available software

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

10

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Groundwater Model
Modelling? Modelling?

10

An

• Represents an approximation to a real field situation i.e simplified version of a real system, • Phenomena that take place within it, • approximately simulates the systems’ systems excitationexcitation-response relationships that 10 are of interest. interest. 6
10

Elango L

na

U

Model

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Groundwater Model
Tool to predict subsurface groundwater flow and solute transport to changes in natural or human induced stresses

10 10

Purpose of Model to organise field data to predict to learn to answer
10

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Types of Models
Types of Groundwater Models

Physical Models

Mathematical Models

Sand Tank Models

Analog Models

Analytical Models

Numerical Models

Viscous Models

Membrane Models

Thermal Models

Electrical Models

10

Numerical Models
Provide approximate solutions to partial difference equation(s) through the discretisation of space and time
to determine groundwater head and conc. 11

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Finite Difference & Finite Element

11

Finite-Difference Equation FiniteGroundwater flow equation in FDE follows application of the continuity equation: i.e the sum of all flows into and out of the cell must be equal to the rate of of change in storage within the cell.
11

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Derivation of the finite-difference equation finiteof groundwater flow
Kx ∂ 2h ∂x 2 +Ky ∂ 2h ∂y 2 + Kz ∂2h ∂z 2 = Ss ∂h ∂t

Partial-differential equation for 3-D movement artialof groundwater through porous earth is

11

Discretisation of Aquifers

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

Source: Modflow manual

11

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Cell i,j,k

11

Groundwater Flow
Flow thro the cell is defiend by Darcy Law Darcy’s Law Discharge through porous media is proportional to the hydraulic gradient and area of cross section Q= KAi Proportionality constant K = Hydraulic conductivity

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

11

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Main stages of modelling
The main stages of the site scale groundwater flow modelling
– – – – – – Conceptual model construction of flow model, creation of an finite difference cells, solving of partial differential equations, g p q , calibration of flow model, computation and assessment of final results, and – sensitivity and uncertainty analysis.

11

Flow Chart of Modelling
Model design design of a grid, selecting time steps, setting initial and boundary conditions, and preliminary selection of aquifer parameters and hydrologic stresses Calibration a set of values for aquifer parameters is found that approximates field measured heads and flows, by trail and error or by inverse methods Sensitivity analysis Post-audit After a few years verify. Adjust model as necessary

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity

11

Elango L

Hydrogeology

Dept. of Geology

Popular Computer Codes
• MODFLOW (Modular Three Dimensional Finite Difference Groundwater Flow Model) - USGS - 3D FDE • PLASM (Prickett-Lonnquist Aquifer (PrickettSimulation Model) - Illinois S W S – 2D FDE • AQUIFEM (Finite Element Aquifer Flow Model) - CSIRO - 2 D FE 11

Elango L

An

na

U

ni

ve

rs

ity