phone 575-834-7391 / E. David Atencio, President September 21, 2012 Secretary-Designate Hanna Skandera NM Public Education Department Jerry Apodaca Building 300 Don Gaspar Santa Fe, NM 87501 Dear Secretary Designate Skandera, The New Mexico Superintendents Council has requested that as President of the New Mexico School Superintendents Association I forward this correspondence to your attention on their behalf. The New Mexico Superintendents Council (NMSC) met this past Monday to discuss several issues that are affecting New Mexico students and their education. The NMSC has determined that a change of approach is necessary in order to ensure that the voices of children, families, communities, and Boards of Education are heard and considered with regard to those issues that directly affect the children of our state. The NMSC has deemed it necessary to hold monthly solutions-based meetings to discuss the many issues facing our children and their schools. The Council invites your involvement and participation as we move forward to provide much needed leadership and direction at a statewide level. The decision to move forward on behalf of children must not be taken out of context. The decision was made after years of attempting to work with the Public Education Department (PED) to improve communication and accountability. The Council has been in existence since the early days of State Superintendent Alan Morgan. The Council was established as a regional council of Superintendents for the purpose of consulting with and providing a voice regarding educational initiatives and concerns. When the State Superintendent’s role was converted to a Cabinet Secretary’s role, the NMSC became the Secretary’s Superintendents Council (SSC.) The SSC is comprised of elected representatives from 8 School Board Regions plus at-large members from the Albuquerque Public Schools, Las Cruces Public Schools, northern, southern, and small school districts. As in the past, the SSC continues to make itself available to the state education leaders of each administration. You have conveyed that your preference is not to meet with the elected Council but instead prefer to appear before Superintendents as a group or meet on an individual basis. The Council strongly contends that it is the responsibility of Superintendents to represent our students, families, communities, and school boards in matters of public education. The following is but one example out of many that has led to this decision to move forward.

Since January of 2012, the Superintendents Association has continued to request accurate and timely information from you and your staff on many matters that directly affect New Mexico students and their education. On August 30, 2012, you released a list of changes that PED made to the A-F School Grading System. While we appreciate finally obtaining the list of PED changes, the Council has expressed deep concern with the lack of communication regarding the changes implemented into the calculation of school grades without any notification to Superintendents and Districts. The Instructional Leaders of New Mexico have been trying to explain to our communities and staff the meaning of the school grades, only to learn that they were operating from PED provided information that was no longer valid or accurate. The Council is concerned that there is a widespread perception that the grading system has come about as a result of "cooperation" or even "participation" from the Council. Your most recent release of information, which occurred months after the release of the school grades and only after repeated requests for accurate information, does not address why "no one was informed" of these changes. Based upon your list of PED changes, the grading system is clearly still under construction. Your release does not however address the "apparent" lack of adherence to legislation that requires that the PED obtain “prior” input from the Council. The information in the release of PED changes to the A-F School Grading System, would lead one to believe that PED sought input from the Council rather than from a select few individuals. The moment that PED elected to exclude the Council in order to make wholesale changes for the sole purpose of obtaining the NCLB waiver, that is when the plan became PED's plan. The PED changes did not reflect input from the Council either before or after the fact. To imply or state otherwise is fundamentally inaccurate. PED has made numerous changes without the required input and without notification to the Instructional Leaders of the State. The lack of communication and adherence to process is but one example of the systematic exclusion of Superintendents and local input. In summary, as a result of the ongoing and systematic exclusion of Superintendents Council input, the Council will take steps to ensure that the concerns of children, families, communities, and Boards of Education are heard and considered. The Council will continue to make itself available to the Secretary of Education and welcomes any opportunity to work in concert towards solutions-based efforts for our students. If in the future you wish to meet, as you have indicated in our most recent conversation, we as an organization stand ready to “dialogue” on mutual issues affecting our children and their education. We welcome your involvement and participation as we move forward on behalf of the 300,000 students of New Mexico. Our children are too important to do otherwise and they deserve no less. Respectfully submitted on behalf of the New Mexico Superintendents Council,

E. David Atencio President - NMSSA

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful