## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Institute of Mathematics University of the Philippines-Diliman

(UP Diliman)

Mathematics of Apportionment

1 / 14

Apportionment is the process of allotting identical, indivisible objects among participants entitled to unequal shares.

(UP Diliman)

Mathematics of Apportionment

2 / 14

Alice, Bob, and Charlie order a pizza for 100. Alice and Bob ate 6 slices each, and Charlie just had 2 slices. They want to split the pizza cost fairly. The smallest denomination they have is 10 peso coin. So they have to round how much each owes to the nearest ten pesos.

(UP Diliman)

Mathematics of Apportionment

3 / 14

Alice, Bob, and Charlie order a pizza for 100. Alice and Bob ate 6 slices each, and Charlie just had 2 slices. They want to split the pizza cost fairly. The smallest denomination they have is 10 peso coin. So they have to round how much each owes to the nearest ten pesos. What?s the fair way to split the bill?

(UP Diliman)

Mathematics of Apportionment

3 / 14

If they had coins. Alice Bob Charlie Total Slices eaten 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 100 ( total price to be paid) Fair Share = number of slices eaten total number of slices (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 4 / 14 ..

30 100 ( total price to be paid) Fair Share = number of slices eaten total number of slices (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 4 / 14 .90 42.. Alice Bob Charlie Total Slices eaten 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.If they had coins.90 14.

one by one. assigning each ten peso. to the person or persons whose fair shares were rounded down the most (the decimal portion of the fair share was the highest) (If one person gets rounded down to zero. assign him ten pesos. If a shortage occurs.) (Used in the US Congress to divide seats) (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 5 / 14 .Highest Remainder Method (also known as Hamilton’s Method) Each person’s fair share is rounded down to the nearest ten pesos.

30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 6 / 14 .90 42.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.90 14.

90 14.90 42.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 Who contributes 10php? (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 6 / 14 .

90 14.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.30php (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 6 / 14 .90 42. Charlie rounded down by 4.90php.30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 Alice and Bob rounded down by 2.

90 42.90 14.90php. Charlie rounded down by 4.30php Charlie contributes the last 10php (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 6 / 14 .30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 Final Contribution 40 40 20 100 Alice and Bob rounded down by 2.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.

30php (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 6 / 14 . Charlie rounded down by 4.66 6.90 42.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.66 10 Alice and Bob rounded down by 2.30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 Final Contribution 40 40 20 100 Price paid per slice eaten 6.90php.90 14.

.If pizza costs 110php. (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 7 / 14 .

10 47.70 110 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 7 / 14 .. Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 47.10 15.If pizza costs 110php.

70php (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 7 / 14 . Charlie rounded down by 5.. Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 47.10 15.If pizza costs 110php.70 110 90 Alice and Bob rounded down by 7.10 47.10php.

70 110 Final Contribution 50 50 10 110 90 Alice and Bob rounded down by 7. Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 47.10php.70php Pizza costs 10php more but Charlie pays 10php less (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 7 / 14 .10 47.10 15.If pizza costs 110php.. Charlie rounded down by 5.

70 110 Final Contribution 50 50 10 110 90 Alice and Bob rounded down by 7.10 15. Charlie rounded down by 5.10php.70php Pizza costs 10php more but Charlie pays 10php less Alabama Paradox (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 7 / 14 .. Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 47.If pizza costs 110php.10 47.

Deﬁnition (Alabama Paradox) refers to any time that increasing the total to be apportioned can decrease one party?s allocation (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 8 / 14 .

Deﬁnition (Alabama Paradox) refers to any time that increasing the total to be apportioned can decrease one party?s allocation Example: increasing the price of the pizza decreased Charlie’s contribution (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 8 / 14 .

the seats of the US Congress increased from 299 to 300.Deﬁnition (Alabama Paradox) refers to any time that increasing the total to be apportioned can decrease one party?s allocation Example: increasing the price of the pizza decreased Charlie’s contribution in 1880. but Alabama decreased its representation from 8 seats to 7 seats! (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 8 / 14 .

Smallest Divisors Method (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 9 / 14 .

If a surplus occurs. repeat steps (1)-(2) with another divisor (If one person gets rounded down to zero. if the sum of the modiﬁed shares is not equal to the total to be apportioned (ie. total number of pizza slices) into a bigger number 2. 1. compute modiﬁed quotas by changing the divisor in the fair share computation (ie. assign him ten pesos. round up the modiﬁed quotas (modiﬁed shares) 3.) (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 9 / 14 . price of the whole pizza).Smallest Divisors Method (also known as Adams’ Method) Each person’s fair share is rounded up to the nearest ten pesos.

Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 10 / 14 .90 14.90 42.

(UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 10 / 14 .30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 Shortage occurs.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.90 14. Modify divisor to 13.90 42.

Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Modiﬁed Quota = number of slices eaten 13 ( total price to be paid) (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 10 / 14 .

38 Modiﬁed Quota = number of slices eaten 13 ( total price to be paid) (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 10 / 14 .Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Modiﬁed Quotas 46.15 15.15 46.

(UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 10 / 14 .15 46.38 Modiﬁed Shares 40 40 10 90 Modiﬁed Quota = number of slices eaten 13 ( total price to be paid) Shortage still occurs. Modify divisor to 12.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Modiﬁed Quotas 46.15 15.

00 16. (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 10 / 14 . Modify divisor to 12.00 50.67 Modiﬁed Shares 50 50 10 110 Modiﬁed Quota = number of slices eaten 13 ( total price to be paid) Shortage still occurs.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Modiﬁed Quotas 50.

Greatest Divisors Method (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 11 / 14 .

total number of pizza slices) into a smaller number 2. compute modiﬁed quotas by changing the divisor in the fair share computation (ie. repeat steps (1)-(3) with another divisor (If one person gets rounded down to zero. If a shortage occurs. the sum of the modiﬁed shares must be equal to the total to be apportioned (ie. a shortage occurs).) (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 11 / 14 . round down the modiﬁed quotas (modiﬁed shares) 3. 1.Greatest Divisors Method (also known as Jefferson’s Method) Each person’s fair share is rounded down to the nearest ten pesos. if (3) is not satisﬁed (ie. assign him ten pesos. price of the whole pizza) 4.

90 14.90 42.30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 12 / 14 .Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.

30 100 Rounded Down 40 40 10 90 Shortage occurs.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Fair Share (in php) 42.90 14. Modify divisor to 13. (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 12 / 14 .90 42.

Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Modiﬁed Quota = number of slices eaten 13 ( total price to be paid) (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 12 / 14 .

38 Modiﬁed Quota = number of slices eaten 13 ( total price to be paid) (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 12 / 14 .15 15.15 46.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Modiﬁed Quotas 46.

38 Modiﬁed Shares 40 40 10 90 Modiﬁed Quota = number of slices eaten 13 ( total price to be paid) Shortage still occurs.15 46.Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Modiﬁed Quotas 46. Modify divisor to 12. (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 12 / 14 .15 15.

67 Modiﬁed Shares 50 50 10 110 Modiﬁed Quota = number of slices eaten 13 ( total price to be paid) Shortage still occurs. (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 12 / 14 .Slices Alice Bob Charlie Total 6 6 2 14 Modiﬁed Quotas 50.00 16.00 50. Modify divisor to 12.

(UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 13 / 14 . Young (1982) proved that any method of apportionment with three or more parties is subject to some paradox of apportionment. Balinski and P.M.

division of seats between parties in a system of proportional representation): the quota rule: Each of the parties gets one of the two numbers closest to its fair share of seats (if the party’s fair share is 3.M. It does not have the population paradox: If party A gets more votes and party B gets fewer votes. no seat will be transferred from A to B. Theorem (Impossibility Theorem) No apportionment method. Balinski and P. Young (1982) proved that any method of apportionment with three or more parties is subject to some paradox of apportionment. (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 13 / 14 . between three of more parties. satisﬁes all of the following (for example.74 seats. it gets either 3 or 4). no party’s number of seats decreases. It does not have the Alabama paradox: If the total number of seats is increased.

unless we are willing to put up with some anomalies in apportionment. (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 14 / 14 .Fair division of seats cannot be decided strictly on a mathematical basis.

One will need to consider other concepts of fairness when apportioning shares.Fair division of seats cannot be decided strictly on a mathematical basis. (UP Diliman) Mathematics of Apportionment 14 / 14 . unless we are willing to put up with some anomalies in apportionment.

- Zogby 12th CD Polltmcnulty8452
- masteryprojectunit3api-295582259
- Political_Campaign_Planning_Manual_MalaysiaAyyana Kingombet Vochita
- ETHICS REFORM AGREEMENT INCLUDES PENSION FORFEITUREMichael Patrick
- Malaysia IGFTBo Dist
- sampleresearchapi-302570275
- Notice: Apportionments, Allocations, and Program Information, Fiscal Year 2008Justia.com
- Short-Sighted Public OfficialsRaymond Ward III
- Down's Summary 2Hanadi Riyad
- LGE Information that is importantShazmania
- Sema vs ComelecChase Daclan
- Online National Polling TGMC 2010 PPTHarshit Srivastava
- Gonzales vs. Comelec GR L-28196Dénise Rafaël
- SupportJetboyinthejungle6032
- Proposed Government Amendments - Bill 20VickiHuntingtonDelta
- eip rough draftapi-276366774
- Forms of government- democracy.pdfJersonGonzagaViernes
- List of Cases in PilStacy Liong BloggerAccount
- RPA, 1951Basho Human
- electoral college conapi-373335157
- APE2_PV20100914114101Celinek
- My Fellow Repblicans- What are we really voting for?jrdougla
- CREMA Median voter.pdfEdwyn Js
- Election Procedure for District and City Cricket AssociationGulraiz Ahmad
- nullapi-26784019
- Georgia Preliminary StatementJohn Hudson
- Mid-term Test Group2David Abonza
- 2012votereducationbrochure chartercommissionapi-232299724
- When a tiger scares away 350 voterswalliullahbukhari
- Pennsylvania Voter ID Law: Is PennDOT ready?PennLive

- CBS News 2016 Battleground Tracker: Pennsylvania, April 2016CBS News Politics
- NBC_WSJ January PollAndrew Rafferty
- Doe v Reed Amicus Brief before Supreme Court joined by Sunlight FoundationSunlight Foundation
- NBC News|SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking PollMSNBC
- Public_161027 NBCWSJ October N900 Poll (10-11 RELEASE)Carrie Dann
- 2016.10.23 - Atlaszerohedge
- CBS News poll 2016 Democratic presidential campaignCBS News Politics
- Poll results for Kentucky's U.S. Senate primaryCourier Journal
- US Senate Primary poll reportChicago Tribune
- SCHEDULE OF GENERAL ELECTIONS - 2014Firstpost
- CBS News poll 2016 Republican presidential campaignCBS News Politics
- EC notice to Narendra ModiFirstpost
- CBS News 2016 Battleground Tracker: New York, April 2016CBS News Politics
- 16991 NBCWSJ Mid-October PollCarrie Dann
- Morris County Voters' GuideMorris County NJ
- Texas v. HolderDaily Kos Elections
- CBS News Battleground Tracker: Georgia, February 2016CBS News Politics
- MemoZeke Miller
- CBS News Battleground Tracker: Texas, 2016CBS News Politics
- The Costs of Voter ID LawsThe Brennan Center for Justice
- CBS News Battleground Tracker: Florida, January 2016CBS News Politics
- CBS News 2016 Battleground Tracker: Pennsylvania, April 24, 2016CBS News Politics
- Democratic Victory Task Force Preliminary FindingsZeke Miller
- Strengthening DemocracySunlight Foundation
- CBS News Battleground Tracker: Virginia, February 2016CBS News Politics
- 15462 NBCWSJ Oct Poll FinalAndrew Rafferty
- Why Is It So Hard To Vote In America?The Brennan Center for Justice
- CBS News Battleground Tracker: Texas, January 2016CBS News Politics
- VA-Gov PPP for LCV (Oct. 2013) - Early Voters OnlyDaily Kos Elections
- NBC_WSJ January PollAndrew Rafferty

- Mubarak and EgyptThe State Newspaper
- U.S. (November 3, 2016) v1 (1)Breitbart News
- CaliforniaDemocratic 2016DelegateSelectionPlan Final-01.08.2016frontloading_hq
- Acceptance Speech by President Elect, Uhuru KenyattaH.E. President Uhuru Kenyatta
- Arkansas Secretary of State Historical Report 2008Arkansas Secretary of State
- Battle plan 2014CityPress
- 2012 RNC Delegate Summaryfrontloading_hq
- SCHEDULE OF GENERAL ELECTIONS - 2014Firstpost
- RP 2013 30forbesadmin
- Memo 201218 - Results of 2012 Freshmen and Special ElectionsAteneo COMELEC
- CampaigningAgainst_3138005aGuido Fawkes
- Chris Bryant Shadow Cabinet PitchGuido Fawkes
- Texas v. HolderDaily Kos Elections
- CBS News Battleground Tracker: Colorado, Oct. 30, 2016CBS News Politics
- Clout Research Poll - OregonThe Conservative Treehouse
- Lutfur Rahman judgment - Spiritual InfluenceThe Guardian
- topline-1-day to goCBS News Politics
- Barack Obama Candidate Affidavit for PA - He Never Signed It - Other PA Candidates Didprotectourliberty
- CBS News Battleground Tracker: Pennsylvania, Oct. 30, 2016CBS News Politics
- DI USA Poll Release 7 Nov 2016Breitbart News
- The Costs of Voter ID LawsThe Brennan Center for Justice
- Bloomberg Politics/Purple Strategies Trump pollBloomberg Politics
- Strengthening DemocracySunlight Foundation
- Why Is It So Hard To Vote In America?The Brennan Center for Justice
- Labour Review 2015Anonymous obKSXkfa
- Morris County Voters' GuideMorris County NJ
- CBS/NYT POLL: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump tied going into conventionsCBS News Politics
- FEC Inquiry Ted Cruz Sketchy Campaign ContributionsThe Conservative Treehouse
- Dnc Donor Deck Leak2RealTrueNews
- Native Hawaiian Nation ConstitutionHonolulu Star-Advertiser

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Loading