2 views

Uploaded by Chitta Ranjan Bhuyan

MANJUSA JENA RESEARCH SCHOLAR UTKAL UNIVERSITY AND FACULTY COLLEGE OF BASIC SCIENCE OUAT BHUBANESWAR ODISHA

save

- Problem Set 03 - System Dynamics
- The-Loss-Factor-as-Measure-Mechanical-Damping.pdf
- Design of Heaving buoy WEC
- Oscillations II
- Experimental and Analytical Methods in FSRU Bilge Keels Design
- Iast.lect18
- Free Vibrations
- free_damped_and_forced_oscillations.doc
- wave
- Modeling Gravity Waves Aluminium Reduction Cells With OpenFoam
- 2974_1_Macine Foundation Design & Cons_Reciprocating Type
- Unsteady MHD Flow of a Couple Stress Fluid Through a Porous Medium P
- Vibration Mid Exam
- Section 17
- 4ME05+June+2014.pdf
- ME22457_Chapter2_012303_MACL
- Nucleolus-Based Profit Allocation Method for Determine Individual Power System Stabilizer's Contribution to System Stability
- Simple Harmonic Motion
- Statistical mechanics lecture notes (2006), L5
- Time Response
- Evaluation of Vibrational Behavior for A System With TwoDegree-of-Freedom Undamped.
- 12 Sub Sea Lifting Oper
- 304L
- MEC421_KJM457_3
- ANTHE Mock Test 1 IX 2018 New
- astronomy in india.pdf
- akash class 8.pdf
- civil engineering journal.doc
- Computer Capsule
- Question on Triangle
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION ASTUDY Chapter III BY MANJUSA JENA
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION A STUDY
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION Chapter IV
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION CHAPTER-V
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION A STUDY Chapter II

You are on page 1of 15

**TRANSFER IN AN ELASTICO-VISCOUS LIQUID OVER AN
**

OSCILLATING PLATE IN A ROTATING FRAME.

S. Biswal

1

, M. Goswami

2

and M. Jena

3

1. Department of Physics, SERC, Bhubaneswar

2. Department of Physics, RIE, Bhubaneswar

3. Research Scholar, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar

Abstract

Hydromagnetic unsteady flow and heat transfer in an elastico-viscous liquid

induced by an oscillating flat plate in a rotating frame have been analysed. It is observed

that the non-Newtonian parameter (R

c

) greatly influences the flow field. The problem of

heat transfer from the plate, taking viscous dissipation into account has also been

considered when the temperature of the plate oscillates with the same frequency as that

of the plate.

Key words : MHD flow, non-Newtonian fluid, rotating frame, heat transfer.

1. Introduction

The study of rotational flow of visco-elastic fluids has attracted the attention of

many researchers because of its applications in technology. The unsteady flow of a

visco-elastic fluid of s Walter ′

B′ model[1] over a plate has been studied by Gulati[2]

Soundalgekar and Puri[3]. Puri[4] alone has analysed the flow induced by oscillations of

a plate in a rotating frame of reference. The rotational flow of an elastico-viscous liquid

due to the time-dependent rotation of a circular cylinder has been studied by Mukherjee

and Mukherjee[5]. Datta and Jana[6] have analysed the flow and heat transfer in an

elastico-visous liquid over an oscillating plate in a rotating frame. In all these problems,

the effects of external transverse magnetic field have not been accounted for, though the

unsteady flow can be controlled by the influence of the imposed magnetic field

perpendicular to the direction of flow. Recently Biswal, Ray and Mishra[7] have studied

theoretically the magnetohydrodynamic flow of a rotating visco-elastic fluid past an

isothermal vertical porous plate.

In the present paper, our aim is to analyse the hydromagnetic unsteady flow and

1

heat transfer in an elastico-visous fluid over an oscillating plate in a rotating frame of

reference.

2. Formulation of the problem:

The mathematical model for s Walter ′

B′ liquid is given by

ik ik ik

P Pg P ′ + − ·

, (2.1)

and

( )

( )

t d e

x

x

x

x

t t P

mr

r

k

m

i t

ik

′

′ ∂

∂

′ ∂

∂

′ − · ′

∫

∞ −

1

. 2 ψ , (2.2)

where P

ik

is the stress tensor,

P an arbitrary isotropic pressure,

g

ik

the metric tensor,

e

(1)ik

the rate of strain tensor and

( ) τ

τ

τ

ψ

τ

d e

N

t t

t t ) (

0

) (

′ − −

∞

∫

· ′ −

, (2.3)

Where N(τ) is the distribution function of relaxation times. For liquids with short

memories (i.e. short relaxation times), the above equations give

( ) ( )

, 2 2

1

0

1 ik ik ik

e

t

K e P

δ

δ

η − · (2.4)

where

( ) τ τ η d N

∫

∞

·

0

is the limiting viscosity at small rates of shear.

( )

∫

∞

·

0

0

τ τN K

dτ and

t δ

δ

denotes the convected differentiation of a tensor.

In a rotating frame of reference, the equation of continuity and the equation of

motion are

0 ·

∂

∂

i

i

x

u

, (2.5)

*

2

k j ijk

j

i

j

i

V

x

u

u

t

u

Ω ∈ +

∂

∂

+

∂

∂

,

=

i

k

ik

i

u

P

B

x

P

P x

P

P

2

0

*

1 1 σ

−

∂

′ ∂

+

∂

∂

− , (2.6)

Where u

i

is the velocity vector,

*

k

Ω the angular velocity vector and P

*

is the

modified fluid pressure which includes the centrifugal force.

2

Consider the flow of an viscoelastic liquid occupying the space z>0 induced by

simple harmonic oscillations U

0

Cos w

*

t in the x-direction of an infinite plate z = 0 in a

rotating frame of reference. The plate is rotating in unison with an angular velocity Ω

*

about

the z-axis. Since the plate is infinite, all physical quantities will be functions of z and t only.

The equation of continuity together with the no-slip condition at the plate then shows that the

z-component of the velocity vanishes everywhere.

As the plate temperature oscillates with the same frequency as that of the oscillating

plate, the energy equation becomes

1

1

]

1

¸

,

_

¸

¸

∂

∂

+

,

_

¸

¸

∂

∂

+

∂

∂

·

∂

∂

2

2

2

* 2

*

*

z

u

z

u

C z

T

t

T

y

x

p

ν

α

(2.7)

Where α

*

is the thermal diffusivity, ν the kinetic co-efficient of viscosity, C

p

the specific

heat at constant pressure and T

*

the temperature of the fluid. In writing equation (2.7), we

have neglected elastic dissipation of the fluid.

Introducing the non-dimensional parameters

0

1

2

0 0

, ,

U

u

u

t U

T

Z U

x

· · ·

ν ν

ξ

,

2

2

0

*

2

0

*

0

2

, ,

ν

ν U K

R

U U

u

u

c

y

·

Ω

· Ω ·

, (2.8)

( )

∞ ∞

∞

−

· ·

−

−

·

T T C

U

E P

T T

T T

w p

r

w

2

0

* *

, ,

ν

α

θ

,

where

ρ

η

ν

0

· and

ρ

0

* K

K · , u

x

, u

y

denote the velocity components along x

and y-directions, the momentum equation (2.6) with the help of equations (2.1) and

(2.4) takes the form

0 2

2

2

2

1

2

3

2

1

2

· + Ω +

∂

∂

−

∂ ∂

∂

−

∂

∂

u M u

T

u

T

R

u

c

ξ ξ

, (2.9)

0 2

1

2

1

2

2

2

3

3

2

2

· + Ω +

∂

∂

−

∂ ∂

∂

−

∂

∂

u M u

T

u

T

u

R

u

c

ξ ξ

(2.10)

and the energy equation (2.7) becomes

P

r

E P

T

r

+

∂

∂

·

∂

∂

2

2

ξ

θ θ

1

1

]

1

¸

,

_

¸

¸

∂

∂

+

,

_

¸

¸

∂

∂

2

2

2

1

ξ ξ

u u

(2.11)

With the boundary conditions

3

u

1

= e

iwt

, u

2

= 0 at ξ = 0

u

1

→0, u

2

→0 at ξ →∞

T

*

−T

∞

= (T

w

- T

∞

) Cos w

*

t at z = 0 (2.12)

T

*

→T

∞

as z →∞

Or, θ = Cos wt at ξ = 0

And θ = 0 as ξ →∞

3. Solution of the equations:

Assuming

u

1

= f

1

e

iwt

and u

2

= f

2

e

iwt

, (3.1)

equations (2.9) and (2.10) become

(1−iR

c

w)

0 ) 2 (

2

2

1

2

1

2

· + Ω + − f M iwf

d

f d

ξ

(3.2)

and (1−iR

c

w)

0 ) 2 (

1

2

2

2

2

2

· − Ω − − f M iwf

d

f d

ξ

(3.3)

The modified boundary conditions for velocity become

f

1

= 1 and f

2

= 0 at ξ = 0

and f

1

= 0 and f

2

= 0 at ξ →∞ (3.4)

Eliminating f

2

from equations (3.2) and (3.3), we have

(1−iR

c

w)

2

2

1

2

4

1

4

) 1 ( 2

ξ ξ d

f d

w iR iw

d

f d

c

− −

−(w

2

−4Ω

2

−M

4

)f

1

= 0 (3.5)

Solving equation (3.5), we obtain f

1

. Having found f

1

, we can find f

2

from equn.

(3.2). Obtaning f

1

and f

2

, we can find expressions for u

1

and u

2

. These expressions are

u

1

=

2

1

[e

{-A

ξ

+i(wT-B

ξ

)}

+

{ } ) (

1 1

ξ ξ B wT i A

e

− + −

] for w > 2Ω (3.6)

u

2

= −

2

i

[e

{-A

ξ

+i(wT-B

ξ

)}

−

{ } ) (

1 1

ξ ξ B wT i A

e

− + −

] (3.7)

and

u

1

=

2

1

[e

{-A

ξ

+i(wT-B

ξ

)}

+

{ } ) (

1 2

ξ ξ B wT i A

e

+ + −

] for w < 2Ω (3.8)

u

2

= −

2

i

[e

{-A

ξ

+i(wT-B

ξ

)}

−

{ } ) (

2 2

ξ ξ B wT i A

e

− + −

] (3.9)

where

4

A =

( ) β α −

,

_

¸

¸

+

+ Ω +

2 2

2

1

2

2

1

w R

M w

c

B = ( ) β α +

,

_

¸

¸

+

+ Ω +

2

1

2 2

2

1

2

2

1

w R

M w

c

A

1

= ( ) β α −

,

_

¸

¸

+

− Ω −

2

1

2 2

2

1

2

2

1

w R

M w

c

B

1

= ( ) β α +

,

_

¸

¸

+

− Ω −

2

1

2 2

2

1

2

2

1

w R

M w

c

α = ( ) { }

2

1

2

1

2 2

1 1

2

1

+ + w R

c

β = ( ) { }

2

1

2

1

2 2

1 1

2

1

− + w R

c

A

2

= ( ) { }

2

1

2

1

2 2

2

1

2 2

2

1

1

2

2

1

w R w R

w R

w M

c c

c

+ +

,

_

¸

¸

+

− + Ω

B

2

= ( ) { }

2

1

2

1

2 2

2

1

2 2

2

1

1

2

2

1

w R w R

w R

w M

c c

c

− +

,

_

¸

¸

+

− + Ω

In the absence of rotation (Ω = 0), u

2

= 0 and u

1

is given by

u

1

=

{ } ) (

* *

ξ ξ B wT i A

e

− + −

, (3.10)

where A

*

and B

*

are obtained from the above constants by putting Ω = 0. It is observed

from (3.10) that the two layers merge into one, which oscillates with amplitude

ξ

*

0

A

e U

−

and a phase lag B

*

ξ.

Components of shear stress at the plate (ξ = 0):

τ

zx

=

0

1

1

·

1

]

1

¸

∂

∂

,

_

¸

¸

∂

∂

−

ξ

ξ

u

T

R

c , (3.11)

and

τ

zy

=

0

2

1

·

1

]

1

¸

∂

∂

,

_

¸

¸

∂

∂

−

ξ

ξ

u

T

R

c , (3.12)

Using equations (3.6) – (3.9) in equations (3.11) and (3.12), we have

τ

zx

= −

2

1

R

1

) (

1

θ + wT i

e , (3.13)

5

and

τ

zy

= −

2

1

R

2

) (

2

θ − wT i

e , (3.14)

where

R

1

=

( ) ( ) { }

2

1

2

1

4 2 2

2

1

2 2

4 1 2

1

]

1

¸

− Ω − + + M w w w R

c

,

R

2

=

( ) ( ) { }

2

1

2

1

4 2 2

2

1

2 2

4 1 2

1

]

1

¸

− Ω − − + M w w w R

c

,

Tan θ

1

=

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) β α β α

β α β α

+ + −

− − +

w R

w R

c

c

, w > 2

Tan θ

2

=

( ) ( )

( ) ( ) β α β α

β α β α

− − +

+ + −

w R

w R

c

c

,

And

R

1

=

( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

2 2

1 B B A A w R

c

− + + +

R

2

=

( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

2 2

1 B B A A w R

c

+ + − +

Tan θ

1

=

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

2 2

2 2

B B w R A A

A A w R B B

c

c

− + +

+ − −

w < 2

Tan θ

2

=

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

2 2

2 2

A A w R B B

B B w R A A

c

c

− − +

+ + −

Heat transfer:

Assuming

θ (ξ, T) = θ

1

(ξ) e

iwt

+ θ

2

(ξ) e

2iwt

, (3.15)

and using the equations (3.6) – (3.9), equation (2.11) has been integrated under the

boundary conditions (2.12) to give

θ = exp

( ) ) (

2

) 1 (

1 1

2

1

in m E P e

w

P i

r

iwt

r

− +

¹

;

¹

¹

'

¹

+ − ξ

( ) { } ( ) [ ] { } [ ] ξ ξ ) ( exp ) 1 ( exp

1 1

2

1

B B i A A w P i

r

+ + + − − + −

e

2iwt

for w > 2 Ω, (3.16)

and

6

θ = exp

( ) ) (

2

) 1 (

4 4

2

1

in m PE e

w

P i

iwt

r

+ +

¹

;

¹

¹

'

¹

+ − ξ

( ) { } ( ) [ ] { } [ ] ξ ξ ) ( exp ) 1 ( exp

2 1

2

1

B B i A A w P i

r

− + + − − + −

e

2iwt

for w > 2 Ω, (3.17)

where

m

1

=

( ) ( ) { } R w P w M w

r

2 / 4 ) 1 ( 4 4

2

1

2 2

2

1

4 2 2

Ω − + − − Ω −

,

n

1

=

( ) R w R P M w

c r

2 4 4

2

2

1

4 2 2

− Ω −

,

R =

( ) { }

4 2 2

2

2

1

4 2 2

4 4 ) 1 ( w R P M w w P

c r r

+ − Ω − + −

m

2

= AA

2

−BB

2

, n

2

= AB

2

−BA

2

,

m

3

= m

2

(1+ R

c

2

w

2

) −R

c

w

2

,

n

3

= (n

2

+ P

r

w) (1+R

c

2

w

2

) −w,

m

4

= (m

2

m

3

+ n

2

n

3

)/2 (m

3

2

+ n

3

2

),

n

4

= (m

2

n

3

−n

2

m

3

)/2 (m

3

2

+ n

3

2

),

The rate of heat transfer at the plate (ξ = 0) is

Nu

1

=

0 ·

,

_

¸

¸

ξ

ξ

θ

d

d

= −

( ) [

2

1

2 / w P

r

(Cos wT −Sin wT)

+ P

r

E {(m

1

m

5

+ n

1

n

5

) Cos 2wT,

−(m

1

n

5

−n

1

m

5

) Sin 2wT}]; (3.18)

for w > 2Ω

and

Nu

2

=

0 ·

,

_

¸

¸

ξ

ξ

θ

d

d

= −

( ) [

2

1

2 / w P

r

(Cos wT −Sin wT)

+ P

r

E {(m

4

m

6

−n

4

n

6

) Cos 2wT,

−(m

4

n

6

+ n

4

m

6

) Sin 2wT}]; (3.19)

for w < 2Ω

where

m

5

= ( )

2

1

w P

r

−(A+A

1

), n

5

= ( )

2

1

w P

r

−(B+B

1

)

n

6

= ( )

2

1

w P

r

−(A+A

1

), n

6

= ( )

2

1

w P

r

−(B−B

1

)

4. Results and discussions:

7

The effects of the fluid parameter like the elastic or non-Newtonian parameter

R

c

, rotation parameter Ω, Magnetic parameter M, Eckert number E and Prandtl number

P

r

on the velocity, temperature, skin-friction and the rate of heat transfer can be

explained from the expressions of u

1

, u

2

, θ, τ

zx

, τ

zy

, Nu

1

and Nu

2

respectively.

Velocity of the fluid:

It is observed that the velocity consists of damped harmonic oscillations with

amplitudes U

0

e

-A

ξ

and U

0

ξ

1

A

e

−

for w > 2Ω and having phase lags Bξ and B

1

ξ

respectively relative to the wall. The depths of penetration or wave lengths of the two

layers are respectively

B U

0

2πν

and

1 0

2

B U

πν

. Because of the presence of elasticity

of the fluid, A and B decrease while A and A

1

increase for w < R

c

w ≤ 0.58. This

implies that the depths of penetration

B U

0

2πν

and

1 0

2

B U

πν

decrease for 0<R

c

w ≤

0.58 and increase for 0.59 ≤ R

c

w.

For w < 2Ω, the velocity consists of two damped oscillations of which one is the

same as that for the case w > 2Ω while the second one has an amplitude U

0

ξ

2

A

e

−

and has

a phase advance B

2

ξ with respect to the plate. The depth of penetration of the second

layer is

2 0

2

B U

πν

which decreases with R

c

w.

For w = 2Ω, we have the phenomenon of resonance similar to the result

obtained by Thornley[8] in her study of non-torsional oscillations of an infinite non-

porous plate rotating in accord with a viscous fluid. This resonance implies that the

whole liquid is affected by the motion of the plate and the oscillation is not confined to

a well-defined Ekman layer near the plate. For low magnetic field strength, the result

obtained here tallies well with those of Datta and Jana[6]. However, the external

transverse magnetic field decelerates the flow.

Amplitude of the Shear stress:

The amplitudes of shear stresses τ

zx

and τ

zy

are given by the values of R

1

and R

2

.

The phases are represented by tan θ

1

and tan θ

2

as mentioned earlier. For w>2Ω, both

R

1

and R

2

increase with increase in R

c

and w and are fixed while for fixed R

c

and Ω, R

1

8

increase and R

2

decreases with increase in w. For w<2Ω, the values of R

1

and R

2

are

given in Tables 1 and 2 respectively.

Table : 1

Values of R

1

for Ω = 5.0, M = 0.1

c

R

w 0.0 0.05 0.10

1.0 4.4720350 4.4739285 4.4813534

2.0 4.4720350 4.4828172 4.5052012

3.0 4.4720350 4.4961705 4.5484215

4.0 4.4720350 4.5051123 4.6223899

Table : 2

Values of R

2

for Ω = 5.0, M = 0.1

c

R

w 0.0 0.05 0.10

1.0 4.4721357 4.4638161 4.4743623

2.0 4.4721357 4.4721618 4.5051228

3.0 4.4721357 4.4861703 4.5584109

4.0 4.4721357 4.4952919 4.5522815

From the numerical values of R

1

and R

2

entered in the above tables, it is noticed

that both R

1

and R

2

increase with increase in R

c

(non−Newtonian flow). When R

c

=0

(Newnotian flow), the frequency parameter w does not produce any effect on the

amplitude of the shear stresses τ

zx

and τ

zy

under the action of low magnetic field

strength.

The phases of the skin-friction tan θ

1

and tan θ

2

for both w > 2Ω and w < 2Ω

have been plotted against R

c

taking different values of w and Ω (Fig.4). It is observed

that keeping w fixed, tan θ

1

decreases with increase in R

c

, whereas tan θ

2

increases with

increase in either R

c

or w for both cases w>2Ω and w ∠ 2Ω.

For the Newtonian fluid (R

c

=0), both tan θ

1

and tan θ

2

are independent of

frequency w when w > 2Ω. In the presence of elasticity of the fluid (R

c

≠ 0), the

frequency w influences the values of tan θ

1

and tan θ

2

. However, for large rotation

(w<2Ω), the effect of w on tan θ

1

and tan θ

2

is prominent even in the case of Newtonian

fluid (R

c

=0) and for weak magnetic field.

Rate of heat transfer:

The values of the rate of heat transfer for wT=

2

π

, E=0.02 and P

r

=0.71, Ω=2, 5

9

and for different values of w and R

c

are entered in Table 3 below.

Table : 3

Rate of heat transfer for wT =

2

π

, E = 0.02 and P

r

= 0.71 and M = 0.1

w

c

R

Ω 0.0 0.05 0.10

1.0 5.0 0.528717 0.526528 0.525215

2.0 0.793105 0.792834 0.790254

3.0 0.986762 0.984624 0.982561

5.0 2.0 1.287056 1.243435 1.222374

10.0 1.856986 1.8266724 1.809346

15.0 2.321056 2.205641 2.198762

The numerical values of the rate of heat transfer presented in Table-3 explain

that for fixed w, the rate of heat transfer decreases with increase in R

c

while for fixed

R

c

, the rate of heat transfer increases with increase in w. It is also marked that the rate

of heat transfer is less in the case of visco-elastic fluid (R

c

≠ 0) than those of Newtonian

fluid (R

c

=0). Similar results were obtained by Datta and Jana[6] without the imposition

of an external transverse magnetic field. The only difference is observed that the

external transverse magnetic field reduces the velocity of flow which, in turn, results in

the production of less friction between the fluid layers and thereby transmission of low

thermal energy.

Conclusion:

Following conclusions are gleaned from the results obtained from our

investigation.

i) Exact solutions of the constitutive equations are arrived at.

ii) The velocity of flow has been reduced due to the action of the external

transverse magnetic field.

iii) The amplitudes of the shear stresses τ

zx

and τ

zy

increase with increase in R

c

.

iv) The phase (tan θ

1

) of the skin-friction τ

zx

decreases with increase in R

c

and

the phase (tan θ

2

) of the skin-friction τ

zy

increases with increase in R

c

.

v) The rate of heat transfer decreases with increase in R

c

while for fixed R

c

, the

Nusselt number increases with increase in w.

vi) The rate of heat transfer is less in case of non-Newtonian fluid (R

c

≠ 0) than

10

those of Newtonian fluid (R

c

=0).

References:

1. Walters’ K., J. Mech., 1, 474 (1962)

2. Gulati, S.P., J. Mech., 5, 250 (1967)

3. Soundalgekar, V.M. and Puri, P., J. Fluid Mech., 35, 561 (1969)

4. Puri, P., Appl. Sci. Res., 28, 111 (1973)

5. Mukherjee, S. and Mukherjee, Srikumar, Indian J. Pure Appl., Math.,

14(12), 1534-1541 (1983)

6. Datta, N. and Jana, R.N., Istanbul Univ. Fen Fak. Mec. Seri A, 43, 121

(178).

7. Biswal, S., Ray, G.S. and Mishra, S.S., communicated to Acta Ciencia

Indica, (2009).

8. Thornby, C., Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 21, 451 (1968).

11

Fig. 1 :Effects of Hartman number on f

1

when R

c

= 0.05, E = 0.02, Ω = 5.0

12

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

ξ

f

1

Curve-I Curve-II Curve-III

Curve

I − M = 0.1

II − M = 0.2

III − M = 0.3

I

II

III

Fig. 2 :Effects of Hartman number on f

2

when R

c

= 0.05, E = 0.02, Ω = 5.0

13

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

ξ

f

2

Curve-I Curve-II Curve-III

Curve M

I − 0.1

II − 0.2

III − 0.3

III

II

I

Fig. 3 :Effects P

r

and w on the temperature when R

c

= 0.05, M = 0.1, E = 0.02,

Ω = 5.0

14

Curve-I

Curve-II

Curve-III

Curve-IV

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 0.2 0.4 6 0.8 1

ξ

θ

Curve-I Curve-II Curve-III Curve-IV

Curve P r w

I − 0.71 5.0

II − 0.0 5.0

III − 7.0 5.0

IV − 7.0 10.0

Fig. 4 : Graphs of tan θ

1

and tan θ

2

against R

c

15

- Problem Set 03 - System DynamicsUploaded bykyzhang12
- The-Loss-Factor-as-Measure-Mechanical-Damping.pdfUploaded bysalvatorgabriele
- Design of Heaving buoy WECUploaded bySudheer Kumar
- Oscillations IIUploaded byAhsan Tariq
- Experimental and Analytical Methods in FSRU Bilge Keels DesignUploaded byKalipada Sen
- Iast.lect18Uploaded byVicente Scott
- Free VibrationsUploaded byStefan Stanca
- free_damped_and_forced_oscillations.docUploaded byMuhclasAdePutra
- waveUploaded bySattar Al-Jabair
- Modeling Gravity Waves Aluminium Reduction Cells With OpenFoamUploaded byreaktorenergi
- 2974_1_Macine Foundation Design & Cons_Reciprocating TypeUploaded byChungath Linesh
- Unsteady MHD Flow of a Couple Stress Fluid Through a Porous Medium PUploaded byratchagar a
- Vibration Mid ExamUploaded byduraiprakash83
- Section 17Uploaded bykarim
- 4ME05+June+2014.pdfUploaded byKiran HS
- ME22457_Chapter2_012303_MACLUploaded byhungphuc2010
- Nucleolus-Based Profit Allocation Method for Determine Individual Power System Stabilizer's Contribution to System StabilityUploaded byArun Joseph
- Simple Harmonic MotionUploaded byJC Reyes
- Statistical mechanics lecture notes (2006), L5Uploaded byOmegaUser
- Time ResponseUploaded byFrogie Huniebie
- Evaluation of Vibrational Behavior for A System With TwoDegree-of-Freedom Undamped.Uploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- 12 Sub Sea Lifting OperUploaded byZharthit Phras
- 304LUploaded byaham17
- MEC421_KJM457_3Uploaded byMohammad Syawal Ismail

- ANTHE Mock Test 1 IX 2018 NewUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- astronomy in india.pdfUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- akash class 8.pdfUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- civil engineering journal.docUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- Computer CapsuleUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- Question on TriangleUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION ASTUDY Chapter III BY MANJUSA JENAUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION A STUDYUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION Chapter IVUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION CHAPTER-VUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan
- RIGHT TO EDUCATION A STUDY Chapter IIUploaded byChitta Ranjan Bhuyan