68 views

Uploaded by Abdullah Al Mamun Billah

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Subsonic and Supersonic Air Intakes
- Science 1
- Reynolds Number
- A Finite-Volume Algorithm for All Speed Flows
- Mechanical Syllabus
- Bachelor of Engineering - 2010 Admission
- ch4595
- kays
- Flow in Water Piping
- EML 3701 Fluid Mechanics
- Schulkes_Slug Frequencies revisited.pdf
- DNS study
- 143904216 Natural Convection Heat Transfer in Fluent
- Austin, P.P. (1975)_How to Simplify Fluid Flow Calculations (Hy
- HSA[10] HSpeed Notes
- LTU-EX-2011-33220864
- 140611-140102-AERODYNAMICS-1
- R05422104-HYPERSONICAERODYNAMICS
- Sure Sh 1
- lab5HT

You are on page 1of 17

DEFINITION AND USES OF SIMILITUDE Similitude means similarity it impossible to determine all the essential facts for a given fluid flow by pure theory alone we must often depend on experimental investigations. we can greatly reduce the number of tests needed by systematically using dimensional analysis and the laws of similitude or similarity. Because, these enable us to apply test data to other cases than those observed. we can obtain valuable results at a minimum cost from tests made with small-scale models of the full-size apparatus. The laws of similitude enable us to predict the performance of the prototype, which means the full-size device, from tests made with the model. for example, we might study the flow in a carburetor in a very large model.

Ships in towing basins, Airplanes in wind tunnels, Hydraulic turbines, Centrifugal pumps, Spillways of dams, River channels and the study of such phenomena as the action of waves and tides on beaches, Soil erosion and Transport of sediment.

GEOMETRIC SIMILARITY geometric similarity means that the model and its prototype have identical shapes but differ only in size. the flow patterns must be geometrically similar. If subscripts p and m denote prototype and model, respectively, we define the length scale ratios as the ratio of the linear dimensions of the prototype to the corresponding dimensions in the model.

=

GEOMETRIC SIMILARITY

Complete geometric similarity is not always easy to attain. For example,

we may not be able to reduce the surface roughness of a small model in proportion unless we can make its surface very much smoother than that of the prototype.

Similarly, in the study of sediment transport, we may not be able to scale down the bed materials without having material so fine as to be impractical. Fine powder, because of cohesive forces between the particles, does not simulate the behavior of sand.

GEOMETRIC SIMILARITY

Again, in the case of a river the horizontal scale is usually limited by the available floor space, and this same scale used for the vertical dimensions may produce a stream so shallow that capillarity has an appreciable effect and also the bed slope may be so small that the flow is laminar. In such cases we need to use a distorted model, which means that the vertical scale is larger than the horizontal scale. Then, if the horizontal scale ratio is denoted by Lr and the vertical scale ratio by Lr, the cross section area ratio is LrLr

KINEMATIC SIMILITARY

Kinematic similarity implies that, in addition to geometric similarity, the ratio of the velocities at all corresponding points in the flows are the same. The velocity scale ratio is

and this is a constant for kinematic similarity. Its value in terms of L, is determined by dynamic considerations. As time T is dimensionally L/V, the time scale ratio is = and in a similar manner the acceleration scale ratio is 2 = 2 =

DYNAMIC SIMILARITY Two systems have dynamic similarity if, in addition to kinematic similarity, corresponding forces are in the same ratio in both. The force scale ratio is

=

which must be constant for dynamic similarity. Forces that may act on a fluid element include those due to gravity (FG), pressure (FP), viscosity (Fv), and elasticity (FE). Also, if the element of fluid is at a liquid-gas interface, there are forces due to surface tension (FT).

DYNAMIC SIMILARITY(Cont..) If the sum of forces on a fluid element does not add up to zero, the element will accelerate in accordance with Newton's law. We can transform such an unbalanced force system into a balanced system by adding an inertia force F, that is equal and opposite to the resultant of the acting forces. Thus, generally,

Dynamic Similarity

These forces can be expressed in the simplest terms as: Gravity: FG = mg = pL3g Pressure: FP = (p)A = (p)L2 Viscosity: FV = du/dyA = (V/L)L2 = VL Elasticity: FE = EvA = EvL2 Surface tension: FT = L Inertia: FI = ma = L3 L/T2 = L4T-2 = V2L2

In many flow problems some of these forces are either absent or insignificant. In Fig we see two geometrically similar flow systems. Let us assume that they also possess kinematic similarity, and that the forces acting on any fluid element are FG , FP ,FV , and FI. Then we will have dynamic similarity if

= = = =

Reynolds Number

In the flow of a fluid through a completely filled conduit, gravity does not affect the flow pattern. Also, since there are no free liquid surfaces, capillarity is obviously of no practical importance. Therefore the significant forces are inertia and fluid friction due to viscosity. For the ratio of inertia forces to viscous forces, we call the resulting parameter the Reynolds number This is actually a theory of dynamic similarity

Reynolds Number(Cont)

The ratio of these two forces is

2 2 = = = =

For any consistent system of units, R is a dimensionless number, which turns out to be useful for comparing different flows. The linear dimension L may be any length that is significant in the flow pattern. Thus, for a pipe completely filled, commonly we use the pipe diameter for L.

= =

where D is the diameter of the pipe. If two systems, such as a model and its prototype, or two pipelines with different fluids, are dynamically equivalent so far as inertia and viscous forces are concerned, they must both have the same value of R. Thus, for such cases, we will have dynamic similarity when

= = =

Froude Number

When we consider inertia and gravity forces alone, we obtain a ratio called a Froude number, or F. The ratio of inertia forces to gravity forces is 2 2 2

3 =

Although this is sometimes defined as a Froude number, it is more common to use the square root so that V is in the first power, as in the Reynolds number. Thus a Froude number is

=

Systems involving gravity and inertia forces include the wave action set up by a ship, the flow of water in open channels, the forces of a stream on a bridge pier, the flow over a spillway, the flow of a jet from an orifice, and other cases where gravity is the dominant factor. To compute F, the length L must be some linear dimension that is significant in the flow pattern. For a ship, we commonly take this as the length at the waterline. For an open channel, we take it as the depth of flow. For situations where inertia and gravity forces predominate, dynamic similarity occurs when

= = =

Dynamic Similarity

Mach Number When compressibility is important, we need to consider the ratio of the inertia to the elastic forces. The Mach number M is defined as the square root of this ratio.

where c is the sonic velocity (or celerity) in the medium in question (see Sec. 13.3). So the Mach number is the ratio of the fluid velocity (or the velocity of the body through a stationary fluid) to that of a sound wave in the same medium. If M is less than 1, the flow is subsonic if it is equal to 1, it is sonic; if it is greater than 1, the flow is called supersonic .

Weber Number Surface tension may be important in a few cases of flow, but usually it is negligible. The ratio of inertia forces to surface tension is pV2L2/L, the square root of which is known as the Weber number: Euler Number A dimensionless quantity related to the ratio of the inertia forces to the pressure forces is known as the Euler number.

Dynamic Similarity

- Subsonic and Supersonic Air IntakesUploaded bySanjay Singh
- Science 1Uploaded byGunes Gurbuz
- Reynolds NumberUploaded byNur Falini Mohd Sukkri
- A Finite-Volume Algorithm for All Speed FlowsUploaded byles_les
- Mechanical SyllabusUploaded byravijecrc
- Bachelor of Engineering - 2010 AdmissionUploaded byrickysaini
- ch4595Uploaded byMohammad Ali Nekooie
- kaysUploaded bydarshildj
- Flow in Water PipingUploaded byJan
- EML 3701 Fluid MechanicsUploaded bynick
- Schulkes_Slug Frequencies revisited.pdfUploaded byneverwolf
- DNS studyUploaded byAshkanHosseini
- 143904216 Natural Convection Heat Transfer in FluentUploaded byAnwar Ibrahim
- Austin, P.P. (1975)_How to Simplify Fluid Flow Calculations (HyUploaded byBruno Valente
- HSA[10] HSpeed NotesUploaded bymohdrashdansaad
- LTU-EX-2011-33220864Uploaded byFernando Andres Mackay
- 140611-140102-AERODYNAMICS-1Uploaded byKelvin Sudani
- R05422104-HYPERSONICAERODYNAMICSUploaded byAllamrajukashivishwa
- Sure Sh 1Uploaded byPrasad Khati
- lab5HTUploaded byiyergv
- 00020630Uploaded byelflaco79
- Rowley 2Uploaded byGiri
- Report for Experiment CUploaded byHadiChan
- FLUID MECHANICSUploaded byRenjith Rajendraprasad
- PS2-Syllabus-2017-3Uploaded byray
- Influence of Slippage of a Gas on the ResistanceUploaded byharshalsparks
- cd166bd1c6f0c3d3ca006acd8e7ffa14Uploaded byramihey
- ME 2008 Gate QuestionsUploaded byadi8489
- obliteracija 2Uploaded byChandra Collins
- pipeline-blockage-detection-IJERTV5IS060675.pdfUploaded byJimena Dri

- Chapter 4 Bernoulli Equation and ApplicationsUploaded byAhmad Ikhwan
- What is the Importance of Reynold Numbers in Flow of FluidUploaded byyowma
- Streamlines, Streak Lines, And Pathlines - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded byanbumani_10
- Determination of pump performanceUploaded bynasrullahbinrosli
- Energy Losses in BendsUploaded byAngelica Joyce Benito
- 1_FlowPatternPrediction_StratifiedModelUploaded byRahul Saraf
- ZAP EXP 9Uploaded byJohn Michael Menoza Zapanta
- Fluid MechanicsUploaded byLiz Bargola
- Viscosity - BrookfieldUploaded byraulmdiaz
- Piezo high Viscosity fluidsUploaded byJosh Brown
- Materials Chapter 4. Plastics Rheology Part 1Uploaded byWerner Conny
- 32901016 Manometer Power PointUploaded byDeepak Gupta
- ch08 mechanicsUploaded byamitfebrile
- 20110125_181626_AirfoilAnalysisUploaded byShashank Sharma
- Fabrication & Installation of Thorp T-211 WingUploaded bySudharSan
- Orr-Sommerfeld Equation DerivationPDFFUploaded byAnmol Kumar
- Design and Application of CFD - FluentUploaded byMahesh J Rao
- Tutorial Pascal BernoulliUploaded byMuhammad Abdullah
- Storm_DynamicsUploaded byПавел Вапцаров
- Joukowski Airfoil at Different ViscositiesUploaded byAntonio Martín Alcántara
- LossCoefUploaded byJorge
- Fluid–Structure InteractionUploaded byjuanarcos_778612
- Forced ConvectionUploaded byAnya Cooper
- CATALOGO DE EXCAVADORA CASE 160 CX 7-29031R0-Linked.pdfUploaded byDaniel Galvis
- ME6604-Gas Dynamics and Jet PropulsionUploaded byMohanraj Subramani
- ProgressUploaded byDipendra Sen
- Fedor-200asd9Uploaded byasdas
- Performance analysis of 3D hydrofoil under free surfaceUploaded byrokhgireh_hojjat
- PPO - Reservoir Performance 2 - J-Vogel's- Fetkovich'sUploaded byDavid Garcia Navarro
- FluidsUploaded byDhanBahadur