Legislative Update August 2012

Eaton Vance on Washington

Andrew H. Friedman Principal The Washington Update

What is the “Fiscal Cliff”?
In recent months, a new phrase has entered the national lexicon, a phrase that is likely to reverberate with increasing intensity in the months ahead. That abrupt slowdown in the economy that could occur in 2013 if taxes rise and government spending falls as currently scheduled. Among them are: • Expiration of the Bush tax cuts The Bush tax cuts—the lower tax rates in effect for the past decade—are scheduled to expire at the end of 2012. Republicans believe the Bush tax cuts should be extended for all taxpayers. Democrats believe they should be extended only for middle and lower income families. President Obama has said he will veto any further extension of the Bush tax cuts for upper income families. • Expiration of the payroll tax cut In 2010, to secure the President’s assent to a two-year extension of the Bush tax cuts, the Republicans agreed to reduce the employee Social Security tax rate in 2011 from 6.2% to 4.2%. Subsequently, the Republicans grudgingly agreed to extend this lower Social Security tax rate through 2012 as well. Perhaps surprisingly, Congressional Republicans did not require that this extension be “paid for” (offset with tax increases or spending cuts elsewhere). Another extension of the payroll tax cut is unlikely. The President believes the lower employment tax rate puts money in workers’ pockets, which they will spend and help revive the economy. But many Republicans are not believe that allowing workers to retain a small additional portion of their paychecks actually grows the economy. Many legislators also believe that it is not good policy to deplete the funds available for the Social Security program. • New health care reform taxes To help finance the health care reform law, Congress approved a new tax on investment income to take effect in 2013. Beginning next year, to the extent a family’s overall income is above $250,000 ($200,000 for individual taxpayers), taxable investment income—e.g., interest, dividends, capital gains, rents, royalties—will be subject to an additional tax of 3.8%. This additional tax will not apply to nontaxable income such as tax-exempt municipal bond interest, or to amounts withdrawn from Unless the Supreme Court strikes down the entire health care reform law as unconstitutional, the additional tax on investment income will take effect in 2013, as the Democrats are unlikely to accept any change to their signature legislation.

Not FDIC Insured • Not Bank Guaranteed • May Lose Value

Eaton Vance on Washington August 2012


• Spending cuts The compromise reached last August to increase the national debt ceiling (thereby allowing the United States to avoid defaulting on Treasury securities) calls for cuts in discretionary government spending of $2.1 trillion over ten years, including about $1 trillion of defense cuts. The bulk of these cuts are slated to begin in 2013. Republicans now assert that the compromise implement cuts in excess of the agreed-upon amounts. At the same time, they want to reduce the portion of the cuts allocated to defense. Congressional Democrats have made clear they will not support cuts to social programs above those enumerated in the compromise. The President has said he will veto any effort to unwind the spending cut agreement reached last August. Congress need not pass a single piece of tax legislation in 2012 for the tax increases and spending cuts outlined above to take effect in 2013. They will happen by default. If Congress fails to stop the implementation of these provisions, the higher taxes and lower spending economy in 2013. Economists differ in their estimates, but many expect the slowdown to be around a 3.5 percentage point reduction in GDP . See, e.g., U.S. Fiscal Cliff Notes, J.P Morgan (April . 26, 2012). With GDP currently growing at less than throw the economy back into recession for at least week by a report from the impartial Congressional Economic Effects of Reducing the Fiscal Restraint That Is Scheduled to Occur in 2013

In the current tumultuous campaign environment, legislation before Election Day. Thus, the fate of the tax increases and spending cuts will be decided, if at all, by a “lame duck” Congress convening between Thanksgiving and Christmas in 2012. The Congress that returns for that session will be the existing Congress—a Republican-led House and Democratic-led Senate—regardless of the election at the end of 2012: either he will have been reelected—feeling newly-empowered to enact his policies—or he will be a lame-duck president who can do what he believes is right without concern for the consequences. The hope is that, standing on the edge of the fiscal cliff, the parties will negotiate a compromise during the lame duck session. The most likely candidate for compromise is the pending expiration of the Bush tax cuts. The Republicans have suggested a compromise that would extend all the tax cuts for one more year to give Congress the opportunity to enact tax reform in 2013. Tax reform—lowering tax rates, eliminating loopholes, simplifying the tax code, eliminating the AMT—is universally popular The Democrats almost certainly would insist that any agreement designate a “trigger” to take effect if Congress fails to agree on tax reform next year. The most likely trigger would be the expiration of the Bush tax cuts for all but middle- and lower-income families. The Republicans are unlikely to accept such a trigger; they refused to allow a tax increase as the trigger if (as subsequently happened) the “Super Committee” failed to agree on spending cuts in the wake of the August budget compromise last year.

Not FDIC Insured • Not Bank Guaranteed • May Lose Value

Eaton Vance on Washington August 2012


A more obvious compromise is to extend the tax past the President has insisted on ending the cuts for families with income over $250,000. However, his recent insistence on the “Buffett rule”—which would require families with income over $1 million to pay tax at a rate no lower than the rate imposed on the middle class—suggests that he might accept a $1 million threshold for application of the tax increase. The Republicans will have to swallow hard to accept any tax increase, but if the President maintains his threat to veto a tax cut extension that a compromise as preferable to having the tax cuts expire for everyone next year. Compromise on the spending cuts is more problematic. The Democrats (at least so far) are insisting on implementing the budget agreement of last August, and the Republicans actually are seeking cuts in addition to those agreed upon. Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s have announced that a failure to implement the agreed-upon cuts will result in another downgrade in U.S. debt. The President seems to feel it a point of pride to make sure the compromise takes effect.

Given the rancor that will infuse the campaign, the possibility of a deadlock in the lame duck session cannot be dismissed. If Congress fails to compromise and the tax increase and spending cuts take effect, Congress conceivably could roll back the changes next year. As a practical matter, however, this is likely to happen only if the Republicans win the White House and both houses of Congress. Even in that case, there are procedural maneuvers in the Senate the Democrats might try to avoid or delay such a roll-back.

likely to remain volatile for the remainder of the year. Historically, markets have been volatile before a national election, but calm down once the election is over (regardless of who wins) because uncertainty is reduced. This year, however, volatility may actually increase after the election due to uncertainty about whether and how Congress will Moreover, the threat of rising capital gains tax rates could prompt investors to sell assets to lock in gains near year end, further adding to market volatility.

Not FDIC Insured • Not Bank Guaranteed • May Lose Value

Eaton Vance on Washington August 2012


About Eaton Vance estment strategies and wealth management solutions. The Company’s long record of exemplary service, timely innovation and attractive returns through a variety of market conditions has made Eaton Vance the investment manager of choice for many of today’s most discerning investors. regularly on legislative and regulatory developments and trends affecting investment, insurance, and retirement products. He may be reached at www.TheWashingtonUpdate.com. discussed herein. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness. It is not intended as legal or tax advice and individuals may not rely upon it (including for purposes of avoiding tax penalties imposed by the IRS or state and local tax authorities). Individuals should consult their own legal and tax counsel as to matters discussed herein and before entering into any estate planning, trust, investment, retirement, or insurance arrangement. Copyright Andrew H. Friedman 2012. Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney is not an affiliated company of Eaton Vance or its subsidiaries, including Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.

Before investing, investors should consider carefully the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a mutual fund. This and other important information is contained in the prospectus and summary prospectus, which can be obtained from a financial advisor. Prospective investors should read the prospectus carefully before investing.
Not FDIC Insured • Not Bank Guaranteed • May Lose Value ©2012 Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC. Two International Place, Boston, MA 02110 800.225.6265 eatonvance.com 6116-8/12 EVOWFCCLFMSSB

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful