Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The well known author George Orwell wrote a novel called Animal Farm, which was published in England on August 17, 1945, a drop on the events leading up to the Stalin era and during the pre-World War II, it does not only display the corruption of the revolution by the very hands of its leaders but also shows how the deviation and indifference, ignorance, greed and short sightedness destroys any hope for a utopia, and clarifies that the corruption of the leaders is but a defect in them only (not a wrong to do the revolution itself), as well as show how the ignorance and indifference to the problems in the revolution lead to the atrocities that has failed to achieve a smooth transition to the government of people The novel is an example of literature that holds a warning to political and social movements, which ousted the corrupt governments, institutions and non-democratic but ironically leads to corruption and oppression falling in the same setbacks of power, by using violent and dictatorial methods in attempts to keep that power. Although I fully disagree with the way Orwell had addressed the communist Soviet , and despite my conservations on the collapsed Soviet system, but I cant help but find it in his novel many a similarities in the events on the Egyptian arena, especially with the absence of individual leaders of the Revolution of January 25th, for the movements, which had called for a revolution decided to hold custody of the Egyptian people and their political and economic destiny and they even reached the stage of an inflated ego and went on exaggerating their actions and forgot that if it hadnt been for the people who were fed up and languished out of suffer , which was only a reason to increase their determination, to strike in the squares and face the injustice and react to the violence falling from them - as much as 1000 martyr, none of them belonging to any of these movements, or even have an idea of their goals or programs if it hadnt been for them the revolution wouldnt have succeeded. Then we observe a form of an underlying conflict between these movements starting from the early days of the revolution when you see Asmaa Mahfouz
on the screen of Al-Mehwar satellite channel , and how her colleagues race to refuse her as a speaker on their behalf, on to the emergence of Wael Ghoneim on the screen of Dream Satellite Channel where in his case too his colleagues race to deny that he was the one behind the calls of We all are Khalid Saeed group or that he was the mastermind behind it , and then we have Ahmed Maher statements to Al Masry Al Yom news paper , concerning the possibility of resorting to the Security Council if, "Hosni Mubarak," does not step down ,which earned him the scourge of criticism from the different spectrum of the youth of January 25, But what raises curiosity and wonder is that the vast majority of Egyptian people have decided to oppose what these movements have been calling for, they even decided to contradict what the Democratic presidential candidates had been calling for regarding the referendum on constitutional changes without an attempt from anyone to try to analyze such a phenomenon!!
On the other hand, some sounds that I believe was one of the domestic poultry of the former regime, now emerge as the voices of the revolution and the mouthpiece of the Egyptian people, what was once only a voice of paradoxical criticism of the state of the nation previously so as to keep the ball rolling between them and the ousted regime in order to continue the good life-lined walls and keeping their children in their International schools and some of them criticizing with jokes and humor filled with bitterness not daring to be openly frank otherwise they went behind the sun literally, Then there was the media multi-millionaires, those who obeyed the order of the ousted president and worked only for his satisfaction, or the ones with their very deep relationship with Commission policy and proud of their friendship with Gamal Mubarak and how they express their appreciation for him by giving him the title of Professor ,upon to assure that the specifications described above do not apply to certain persons so as not to strain the reader himself trying to find out the name and so I can be honest I was a man of those whom attacked and criticized with bitterness without attacking the former president in person, but I limited it to attack the
system as a whole and that in order to preserve the ball rolling and to continue the good happy life and for my children to remain in their international schools (and I doubt that anyone out there can make such a confession or speak with this level of frankness) .. And I believe Im a right when I say that likes of those are a lot whether their nature is a domestic pet or plain greedy and hopeful to what is not earned or deserved, but things dont add up when you decide that the poultry become fierce predators attacking this and preying on that, not because the prey is not worth it, but because the predator in this case simply does not deserve this honor. Our country now is going through one of its most difficult stages over the past 40 years and is still in the realm of revolution that is yet not over and apparently will not end in the near future, where it faces the very retro Salafi currents that bear in its literature permits of announced violence and other currents such as the Brotherhood of Muslims with their varied positions once by refusing to participate in the Jan. 25 , then deciding to remain silent followed by the obvious participation and finally abducting the revolution in their favour with the presence of signs of internal divisions proved by the resignation of Mohammed Habib of the Shura Council, and now already evident when some of their youth decided to configure an entity almost independent of the mother group in reference that they are not fully convinced with the thinking and major approach of the Muslim Brotherhood. And then we go to many groups, diversified in their names were among which we find The Coalition of the 25th, and the Youth Revolution Federation empty of any ideology or the least political thought, leaving themselves fickle between waves of conflicts of political thinkers with paper theories without any practical experience, and then we come to the categorical sit-ins , of which the only purpose is an individual self-interest, which is far cry from the interest of the country as whats happening inside Maspero now. Finally, underground organizations led by a group of former state security officers under the supervision of a group of leaders of the National Party of
former financed by billions wither looted Egyptian billions or Gulf blocks transported. And here the Writer of these sentences sees that Egypt within the next few days will go through a stage of revolution in the revolution , especially with the insistence of the military council to hold parliamentary elections in September, throwing over the wall all the fears mentioned above, moreover with the continuation of the extreme measures seemingly more lenient than we are accustomed to, but actually in its a nature a of control over the political life and the imposition of their will on 85 million Egyptian, shamefully leaving the poultry of the Mubarak regime to become their own domesticated creatures, rather than advocating for a comprehensive national dialogue that gives the people the right of knowledge and discussion and an informed choice. Everyone should be fully aware, that Egypt is the Egyptians country and home... Not a poultry farm.
Here's what the Central Government has been doing, paying all effort, to deny and ignore the sectarian crisis, or even exacerbate the problem. The
Governor of Cairo, Mr. Abdel Azim Wazir, the "hero of Duwaiqa massacre" in Shubra. A Region, where church bells joins the minarets of the mosque. Where Copts and Muslims blend in harmony, sharing joys and sorrows. Muslims and Copts in a single fabric that cannot be disrupted by any means. Where all of them believe that Religion is for God and homeland is for all, this governor decided to change all the names of streets and squares, to Islamic names, ignoring the feelings of Copts in this region, as well as the archaeological value of these Christian grounds. Shall I proceed and talk about the restricted freedom in the establishment of houses of worship , And the difficulties faced by Christians in order to build churches, taking into consideration the ease with which mosques are built by Muslims! And lets not forget the Omraneya events, which could not be laid in secrecy by the government, given its geographic location? On another level but in the same meaning, we come to the Idiot christian role played in most television drama and movies, I say most not all, a role given in attempt to emphasize on the peaceful angel-like Coptic, as if he isnt like any ordinary Egyptian citizen, deliberately forgetting that between Muslims and Copts there is the good and there is the evil too! Then in view of the political structure in its entirety we find only two ministers and two governors, as if they were throwing dust in the eyes, raising questions and later suspicion when you cannot find a satisfactory answer to the reasons for this deliberate limitation. If we assume the self-census declared by Pope Shenouda III, according to the records of church visitations, it is estimated that the number of Christians exceeds 12.7 million in Egypt - and they are more- It is certain that there are many fit to assume positions as governors or ministers, or heads of universities ... etc Whom will be for sure more efficient than current. And it doesnt stop there, for the authorities and the people responsible for our home and country came up with the
The bright idea of the Copts parliament seats, as if deliberately laying the principle of labelling Copts as a minority isolated from the social and political fabric and imposing on them a quota within the Council!! Instead of putting safeguards for the integrity and freedom of elections, where we can elect whoever sounds suitable, whether a Copt or a Muslim, male or female. We are not asking here to transform the state to a Christian, and equally we do not want to turn it into an Islamic institution. What we are asking for is a communal stability that ensures the stability of the nation, and its clear that the operators of this nation never did pay attention to what is called the wheel of historical sequence, or what has been termed commonly "history repeats itself History tells us, that back then, before the reign of Mohamed Ali (18051848), we find a blatant challenge and complete neglect to the feeling of Copts in all lands in Egypt. But with the arrival of Muhammad Ali and the authority of which he took in the turbulent times, actually very turbulent and difficult times, where the states treasury was completely empty, we find Muhammad Ali beginning to follow the policy of tolerance, ending the distinction between the Coptic and Muslim where both can submit to their country their best services. The policy based by Muhammad Ali was directed as to provide full equality between Muslims and Copts in rights and duties, where Appointed Copts were instructed to the Centres of Bardis and El Feshn in Upper Egypt, Dermwas ,Bahgourah and Sharqueya, What made Muhammad Ali follow this policy of tolerance and equality was that he was a man of a wide horizon, and broad mentality and that was the secret of his success and reconcile. It should be noted here, that the appointment of Copts, instructing them to centres tantamount to the appointment of governors of the provinces now. This policy followed by the Muhammad Ali to the Copts soon came to fruition that has spread the spirit of equality between all Egyptians in all the villages and the cooperation of the Egyptians, Muslims and Christians. Working sincerely for the glory of the homeland. Thus, Copts have been throughout the era of Mohamed Ali an element in the ocean of the Egyptian
nation living in peace and there was hardly any persecution cast upon them, and if any it would be too light to remember, and the Copts will never forget, that in his era, Mohammed Ali abolished the outfit that was imposed on Christians in earlier times. Not to mention that the era of Muhammad Ali was one of the most flourishing days ever, that passed the Coptic Church, where he abolished all restrictions that were imposed on Christians in the matters of their religious practices and rituals, and not one request filed by the Copts, in aim of constructing or repair of churches was ever faced with rejection. Abdeen Palace challenged a large number of orders for churches, whether for reconstruction of churches and helping them in that matter or an urgency in their implementation and in the era of Said Pasha, and Khedive Ismail Pasha, the commands of building these churches did not stop and continued to multiply. The Khedive Ismail Pasha (1863-1878) who received his education in Vienna and then Paris, when he returned to his country, found that the air is fit to follow the policy of tolerance and equality on a broader scale, so he decided to publicly and officially declare an equality between Muslims and Copts, by the nomination of the Copts to the election of members of the Shura Council followed by the appointment of Copts as judges in courts. We must not forget also that the Khedive Ismail was the first governor to request the rank of bachuip for a Christian man, and many Copts at his days had high-level positions , where Wasif Pasha was appointed as the Chief of Protocol as well as many others, in short, we can affirm that the relations between Copts and Muslims in the era of Khedive Ismail improved markedly, and the principle of political and social equality has become common place in the country, he morally encouraged and materially supported the Coptic sectarian education because Khedive Ismail believed that the Coptic Egyptian and Muslim are the same and equal and so, the Copts enjoyed full and equal citizenship with their fellow Muslims, in the nineteenth century. Thats how things were in Egypt and how its primary two elements were when the ruler was aware of his countries problems, and knew how to put a
balanced solution to ensure domestic stability and full utilization of the capacities of its children. As for Now...We are in a situation of extreme tension, and we must all stand up and insist with the utmost seriousness and societal maturity to correct what has been corrupting and even drop this party that took over power, spoiled our political life, and continuously worked on destroying the social fabric for over 36 years .. A Party that insists on the impoverishment of the people, the consolidation of ignorance , pushing promising minds to migration and the bankruptcy of a whole country. A Party that justly earns the rank: Failure with disgrace
A friend in need...
Questions often arise in my head -that has not yet blazed with grey hair yetbut instead, blazed with thoughts like flames, similar to those flames of
Cairo Fire just prior the July revolution. During two months of being away from the TV screen as a presenter, I had the chance to accurately follow the screens of the Arab and American media, not to mention the discussions of the political salons, which includes the leaders or if I may say the crme de la crme of the political pen, Hence, the questions surfaced and jumped all over my head The Most significant was; what happens after the current President? Or let us call it the scenario of change or the alternative, Of course appeared before me my own censor warning me of the dangers of this zone, reminding me of the consequences known in these cases, starting from losing the means of your living up to being lynched to nearest courts, But came my answer with undeniable confidence "Smile, you arent you living in the most democratic era?" We are now gentlemen fighting for a stable change, not just change in sections of the Constitution that guarantees to the people their right to choose the President of their Republic but not their President where there lies a big difference. We are also working to develop a system to guarantee people's real power through the councils, parliament and through a real transparent representation which is the exact opposite of our current situation, taking in account the presidents absolute power on the people and the Republic, which makes this place of duty more like an absolute ownership matching Saudi Arabia in its decision-making and in the dictatorship, if we were to take a model as an example. Hence, the frontier of change driving Dr. El Baradei before it raising the banner of change! demanded and called out by the public as their own and their republics president, and even the popular movements despite their many different beliefs and with their broad spectrum became supportive of the front of change , to the extent of taking it internationally through international human rights organizations and television screens worldwide, putting the current political system in the position of a fierce defence in times and a patient one in others, so let us leave the dream to the dreamers, if its that of the people or the system itself.
Looking for a response...I keep finding that all the responses of the ruling elite is often reduced in the remarks of the Organization Secretary, National Party, "Ahmed Ezz," who does not carry any official status, but surprisingly entitled to respond, on behalf of the ruler or the ruled!!! .. and to make things worse if you follow his unripe, juvenile actions, you find that he breaks out his claws and fangs in the backs of the opposition, political freedom protestors and anyone who opposes the inheritance, He even entered into a semi-debate with El Baradei on CNN and till now I dont know on whose behalf on what grounds? And how is it that the heads of his party are satisfied to be mastered and represented by an unknown who is the source of all this glory and wealth owned by Ezz...or maybe just Run by Ezz! .. Unless of course this enigmatic figure is actually known, but deliberately denied and hidden. Subsequently we find that none of the masters of the ruling party is to comment on him positively or negatively, something that stresses the presence of this hidden figure that no one dares to breach, or contradict. This is where people have reached conclusions such like that Ezz and his colleagues are inevitably coming and that the party's youth under the banner of Gamal Mubarak, are men of the future and the new era i.e., when Gamal is elected President.
This is actually very remote and far from the truth, for when we follow the historical sequence we find that the institutions of the whole state is not eligible for a civilian governor, in fact, the decision in the end is in the hands of a governing body of decision makers and those who acquire the designation (men of the President) regardless of the name and person, they are men held to the same position - military specifically. And no one can deny that whoever serves as President of the Republic does not pass without the consent of the military establishment, which has been the case ever since 1952 and until this very moment, therefore the potential loss of the hopes of a civil ruling, being Gamal or any other is great. Going back to El Baradei and his weak chance in the position - and this is
not an attack at all, but an apprehension - we find that what we mostly fear is that he might be gripped by the men of the President, becoming the ruler in command with absolute power which helps the growing system of corruption. Moreover, follows the deep devoted defence of El Baradei and how he is fit for the position. Overlooking what is most important. Which is changing the constitution, not why should we disqualify Gamal and not whether El baradei is fit or not. And there we confuse hence lose the most important political battle in the history of this Republic. Or are we facing new aspirants to the character of the Men of the president Where are the forms of pressure on the government and the system to develop a mechanism for change? And where is the real investment for the mobility of the mass in the Egyptian street, or has, the popular and political movements declared themselves as the supreme representative of the Egyptian people? And if so and the people have satisfaction -on their different beliefs-, why push and defend those who could not even defend themselves? Here comes forward the anticipated role of the needed friend in hope to answer just two questions that may help to solve this poor mans dilemma (me): The first... Why El Baradei with all the challenge? The second...What happens after the departure of the incumbent president? May God bless him of course?
writings and articles are usually met with heavy attacks whether on me personally or on my views -which of course are a subject of agreement or disagreement-, I cannot help myself in front of this tremendous amount of repercussions and outcomes of the Iranian-American relationship. It so happens that on Thursday, June 24th, 2010, Iran announces that it has managed to produce seventeen kilograms of twenty percent enriched uranium, which seems to be another act of challenge to the attempts of the United Nations to stop the Iranian nuclear program. This may be viewed or explained by some as the usual Iranian extravagance, especially after the adoption of the international sanctions, however I dont see that as an opposing attitude all along the way, and I will even go beyond that to confirm the presence of a close relationship and a deep link between the United States and the Islamic republic of Iran. We all know that It is far from the political prudence or even wise for Iran to come forward with such an announcement, Especially after what Phillip Crawley, The Foreign Ministry spokesman, had said quoting, " this move made by Iran is very troubling, for it only proves its long practice of the inspectors harassments " commenting on the prevention of two international nuclear inspectors from entering Iran. The seeming meaning of this situation is challenge and provocation, but the heart of the situation is actually a series of actions made to push Iran to become the ladder, on which the American snake can climb up in order to gain full control over the state of affairs in the international and Arabic arena. If we observe carefully , we will notice that lately, Israel has been attaining more control over the Arab political arena, with full apathy towards the American approval and presence, And its complete defiance of its resolution particularly regarding the peace process, And if we go back earlier to October 1973 war and the acceptance of America to extend an airlift between them and Israel on a call of support, or as some people insist the Zionist lobby pressure I find it really funny, to see that a lot of analysts insist on this very primitive theory, since any reader of the war documents hand written by Israeli and American Generals, will find that in fact what happened was that Israel has threatened the US that it will begin a nuclear strike against the Arab forces, which America cannot afford, especially with
the existence of the Soviet Union's position in support of the Arabs at that time, even under a -not so good- relationship with Sadat, which may have lead to what America had feared at the time ..A Nuclear war in the region or in the world if u may, so it had to support and go with the airlift. America In its political history, which does not exceed 250 years, this institutional state, had never accepted the idea of forgetting and letting go, neither did it ever accept any diktats, and as it succeeded in defusing the weapon of Arab oil, it had to override the use of nuclear weapons by the Israeli as a political lever, and here came the destruction of Iraq, and the beginning of building an arm (not an agent) in the region. What the U.S. is now trying to do is to create a nuclear balance in the area opposing the nuclear power of the Israel on a side, and (regarding the geographical and strategic location of Iran on the Arabian Gulf as a gateway into Central Asia) opposing a nuclear-armed Pakistan and India on the other. Let us note a series of contradictions that have been taking place in the international arena on the background of the international sanctions on Iran, specifically the passage of Resolution 1929, which passed new sanctions that abolished the effect of the Turkish-Iranian Brazilian agreement to transfer the amount of Iran's uranium enrichment services abroad. This was supposed to delight the international community which was concerned and troubled by the Iranian nuclear program introduced by Iran on May 17 to the major powers, under an agreement with Brazil and Turkey, to swap weak enriched uranium (3.5%) on Turkish soil by 120 kg of 20% enriched fuel dedicated to the research reactor of Medicine in Tehran, and here I may go far as to say that the new sanctions may be a reason of regret by President Barack Obama, because it may seem as if he backed off from the negotiating table after he had made the largest effort in this area, and after Turkey and Brazil had finally reached serious solicitations put forward on table. On another level , America's man in the European Union, Nicolas Sarkozy confirms to his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev on June 19, That France is willing to begin "without delay" in the negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program under the International Atomic Energy Agency
supervision, according to what the French presidency had announced earlier. Reporters were told, by a source in the French presidency, that during the interview of the two in St. Petersburg, Sarkozy said that "we have adopted new sanctions not to punish Iran but to convince its leaders to return to the path of negotiations." But a with a closer look at the proclaimed stance of America and France and the volume of contrast between them we will find out a good amount of services they had provided to Iran, First: a meal served on a golden plate if I may say, that the Iranian president will enjoy as it will make him appear to defy the whole world and a winner. And secondly because of the Iranian opposition, led by its leader, MirHussein Mousavi system compatibility in the field of nuclear policy, despite its opposition to him in domestic politics. and by the looks of Russia's attitude toward this situation, we find that, the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced that new sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council on Iran will not affect the package surface to air missiles of the S - 300 between Moscow and Tehran, and also confirms that Russia is still taking place in talks with Iran to build nuclear reactors in the Islamic Republic. And as for the U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates, in his testimony before the Senate he declared that he really thinks that Iran could attack Europe using tens or hundreds of rockets as he put it, He added that the threat caused an immediate change in the U.S. missile defence system on the NATO countries (NATO) in Europe. The program will include new missile intercept naval and ground instead of mega-weapons designed to deal with the long-range missiles. Gates said the new system will be ready by 2020, even if Russia vetoes it Accordingly, Iran now turns out to be the main player in the global political conflict, and what Gates had announced and the threats to change the missile defence system of NATO is but a message to Russia that competently aspires to restore the legacy of the Soviet Union. Clearly now, We can see how the U.S. uses Iran as a deterrent and a scarecrow of political pressure on Israel and a pretext for the further militarization of the NATO in the face of the frightening missile walled Russia,
Finally, to conclude this article, listening to Tamer Hosni... I feel that I can write my own songs and also sing them.
that reveres the Turkish stance and in the same time whip lashes Egypts stance and position ,Of them I exclude Mr. Akram Al-Kassas and Mr. Abdullah Kamal with a little reservation on my side. Let's first take a look at the statements just prior the Israeli massacre of freedom, we find that Lieberman had said in the text of the translation of Hebrew "We will not allow the arrival of a fleet of freedom, and Israel will take all measures to prevent it at all costs, whatever the results" What is strange is not Lieberman's remarks, but what is, is that these statements had been issued and then translated and published in several Egyptian newspapers and not one word or comment was written about that, and none of the officials paid any effort to comment on that matter, to the extent that even the Egyptian political leadership, preferred to remain completely silent against the Zionists statements and remarks ,with the same response exactly coming from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, silence, and a reaction way behind the rest of the world without one exception!! This invites the obvious question: Is our leadership taking the department of political Zionism lightly? Or has it lost its political fitness? Thus becoming unable to put things in proper perspective and balance, thinking what Lieberman declared previously was mere chattering? Or maybe they decided to overlook these statements and turn the blind eye in anticipation of the Action if it happens - to begin a series of reactions expected and known in these cases , beginning with Objections, denunciation and condemnation, up to calling onto the ambassador, and Reprimanding him if this even happens which brings us to the articles of self-flagellation - which Mr. Akram Al-Kassas points out in one of his articles that starts off by crying and wailing, and then directly skinning The Egyptian ego, to promote the qualities of the patriot and championship, unto those who dont deserve it on the other hand, as many have done, and hailing Turkey, even a well known writer and chief editor went off in his TV show, delighted to return the power and the authority of Al Othman (Turkey), and insisted on declaring it the substitute of the former Soviet Union in a world suffering from uni-polar dominance, forgetting the historical ambitions of the Turks in the region, and neglecting the real Turkish role and dimensions in a way that raises further suspicion and
mistrust. When we stand on the Egyptian role we must emphasize repeatedly on the sensitivity of the Egyptian political situation due to its relationship with the Zionist entity and the cohesion of the borders and the central vital role in the Palestinian- Israeli talks. So to speak, we find that the passage of some aid across the border or to allow convoys of medical cross is the most that have been allowed so far, in addition to the usual denouncing and condemning, but it seems that Egypt is afraid of entering into the spot of political conflict to lead the region, given the concern of the American anger and disapprove that might happen if Egypt so much as tries to take a decision or make a stand that might return it to the position of focus of the events or perhaps, trying not to undermine the domestic political situation plus the dissatisfaction of the U.S. - in case Egypt take the position of a leading pilot - leading to an instability of the present governance, which is more likely to happen.
Pausing and reflecting on to the fact of the Turkish role, we must first be aware that the political game is the most serious of games based on the art of the possible and this is what Turkey specifically has done, and by observing its moves during the previous period, we find that it was actually panting to catch-up with the European Unions train, whatever the costs and whatever the challenges and difficulties, however, France being a dominance among the EU countries, it became a large stumbling block against achieving this dream and it succeeded in provoking terror and fear within the Union from the approach of 80 million Muslims if they are to become part of the fabric of European society, hence turning the Turkish position from a State seeking to join in, into a country that is trying to emphasize that it has pivotal and active role within the Arab arena, as far as making the EU seriously consider the need to include Turkey as main player in their favour in the region, Which showed, explicitly, since the Turkish mediation in the indirect Israeli-Syrian talks and through the confirmation of the Turkish role in the Iran crisis, 2009, and then their apparent stand and attitude towards Israel in Davos, and the assault on Gaza, 2008, then cancelling the military air exercises with Israel in Ankara, 2010, encouraging many of the Turkish
voices to chant for a new commander for the region, However, to the eyes of anyone who paying attention to details, its clear that Turkey has not cut off or threaten to break off relations with Israel, by near or far, Since the Islamic Party's ruling is keen to strengthen its relationship with Iran whose borders intersect with a united Iraq or if I may say Kurds Iraq (God forbid), and the attempts to woo some Arab countries to the Turkish side, withdrawing the remains of a role that Egypt hardly has a grab on, therefore, we find that Turkey is trying to become the gateway of the region to Europe, and that the region can easily become an affiliate family of Othman forming a new and a larger wider market, Not to mention, that should an inspector follow the Turkish reaction, we find a strong hand on a side and hand full of promises of normalization on the other!!! A contradiction that does not make sense, and if that reflects anything, it proves the political wit of Turkey and the lazy act of thought of some others!! Then some Turkish newspapers come out to us trying to convince us that there is an intention on Turkeys side for a military strike on Israel! Can any strike come off in the light of a framework of relations and joint military exercises and promises of normalization!! What kind of a naive statement is that? And such silliness proved by those who believe!! Finally comes the position of Nicaragua cutting diplomatic relations with Israel coincided with a call to Syria to halt talks with Israel!! Just a call?? And then go back throw the consequences on Egypt!!! What kind of a political stupidity is this? On the other hand, we cannot exempt from the responsibility drawn on Egypt by responding late or not to take action on the event, such as: The withdrawal of the Egyptian Ambassador in Tel Aviv as a first step, and the threat to cut off natural gas, and a freeze of economic relations of all kinds, leading to expel the Israeli ambassador, A step on the way to the policy of repression, a number of measures that maybe extremely dangerous if not calculated accurately, and I know, and Im very acknowledged that the current political leadership are very capable of calculating these expenses and I appreciate their efforts, whatever the difference in opinion. Finally, let me ask in what may appear to be unrelated Can a country of a population of about 93% below the poverty line, with
30% of its citizens suffering from all kinds of social ills, decide on a historical enemy, or even lead a nation of a strength of more than 300 million Arab citizens, or more than one billion Muslims!!! !???