Bookmarks 2012-10-22 - 9/11 - Dimitri Khalezov

Table of Contents
Dimitri Khalezov Links Articles Dimitri Links Videos Evidence - Bathtub, Vehicles, etc Evidence - Iceage Evidence - Nuclear Articles Videos Jeff Prager Operation Plowshare Evidence - Pentagon Missile Evidence - Radiation Articles Videos Viktor Bout research old news articles

Dimitri Khalezov Links

back to top

back to top

9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2 Full) (Part 1 of 2 Full) Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses his insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered. In Part 1, Dimitri explains: - Dimitri Khalezov background - Planes and explosions - Pentagon mentioned (explained fully in Part 2) - Nuclear detonations explained WTC1 & WTC2 nuclear demolition ------------------------------------------------------ 9/11 - Who did it? - Dimitri Khalezov 1) Dimitri interview where he identifies the perpetrator: "The man who planned 9/11, his name is Mike Harari (now 82 or 83 years old) who is a retired counterintelligence specialist and former Deputy Chief of the Mossad ...."2) Excellent interview with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri discusses Mike Harari and why Mike wanted to meet Dimitri: ------------------------------------------------------ Part 2 of 2 is here: Discussion on Alex Jones/Prison Planet that got me BANNED: See "NO PLANE" analysis - click through the images here: Edits to original interview include: - combined 26 parts into 2 parts (2 hours each) - sped up the video by 20% (kept it slow where you have to read) - increased the volume - changed the background music - chopped off the bumper music between clips - Content: added 10 minutes of support material from: 911 Coincidences regarding WTC7 (lady commentator), Alex Jones/Mancow discussing

Rumsfeld interview and his denial of knowing anything about WTC7, support material about 900+ rescue workers (out of 10,000) getting sick with cancer, and an interview with the chopper cameraman that filmed "Nose Out" video claiming he did not see a plane himself - Content: removed the FBI section at the beginning because it delayed getting to the good information Original 26 part interview can be found here along with all evidence presented: 9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (2of2 Full) (Part 2 of 2 Full) Amazing interview with Dimitri Khalezov, former Nuclear Intelligence officer of the Soviet Union. Because of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty of 1976 between the USA and the former USSR and Dimitri's military role in the USSR's Nuclear Intelligence division, Dimitri had certain knowledge of the WTC demolition schema, which was required to obtain the original WTC building permit in New York (i.e. NY did not issue a building permit without submitting a demolition schema). Dimitri uses this insider information combined with his military background to explain the events of 911 in depth. He leaves no 911 question unanswered. In this Part 2, Dimitri explains: - WTC 7 Ground Zero definition - Pentagon missile attack in detail - Seismic readings - 911 media manipulation - F93 crash in Shanksville, PA - Cell phone calls - Hijackers - 911 rescue workers and illness - Ground Zero cleanup ----------------------------------------------------- 9/11 - Who did it? - Dimitri Khalezov 1) Dimitri interview where he identifies the perpetrator: "The man who planned 9/11, his name is Mike Harari (now 82 or 83 years old) who is a retired counterintelligence specialist and former Deputy Chief of the Mossad ...."2) Excellent interview with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri discusses Mike Harari and why Mike wanted to meet Dimitri: ------------------------------------------------------ Part 1 of 2 is here: Another excellent interview is with Jim Fetzer where Dimitri explains "who did it" and why the culprits became interested in meeting with him. The entire interview is excellent but Part 10 is where Dimitri discuss "who did it": Discussion on Alex Jones/Prison Planet that got me BANNED: See "NO PLANE" analysis - click through the images here: Edits to the original interview include: - combined 26 parts into 2 parts (2 hours each) - sped up the video by 20% (kept it slow where you have to read) - increased the volume - changed the background music - chopped off the bumper music between clips Content: added 10 minutes of support material from: 911 Coincidences regarding WTC7 (lady commentator), Alex Jones/Mancow discussing Rumsfeld interview and his denial of knowing anything about WTC7, support material about 900+ rescue workers (out of 10,000) getting sick with cancer, and an interview with the chopper cameraman that filmed "Nose Out" video claiming he did not see a plane himself - Content: removed the FBI section at the beginning because it delayed getting to the good information Original 26 part interview can be found here along with all evidence presented: Ask Questions Blog: Support Evidence for Dimitri Khalezov's 9/11 Testimony Ask Questions Blog: 9/11 Rescue Workers Suffer from Radiation Exposure Ask Questions Blog: Dimitri Khalezov reply to Judy Wood supporter Nuclear Demolition - WikiSpooks v4 Dimitri Khalezov - Banned from Alex Jones Prison Forum Forum vF Dimitri Khalezov Discussion Banned From Alex Jones Prison Planet Forum (FINAL CUT)

WTC Spires Explained - Dimitri Khalezov - YouTube 9/11 Nuclear Demolition of The WTC - by Dimitri Khalezov (Mike Harari details) The Destruction - Part 1/2 - YouTube The Destruction - Part 2/2 - YouTube 911-dimitri-interview-review-redeux-v2 | Flickr - Photo Sharing! "Do right by Free Planet," is the only rule.: DMITRI KHALEZOV'S CASE FOR A NUCLEAR DEMOLITION OF WTC 1, 2 and 7 911 explained - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2) - 9/11: The Third Truth - Dimitri Khalezov (2of2 Full) - 911 Debunking the Debunkers Dimitri Khalezov vs Famous Physicist Jan Zeman Blogger: The Vatic Project - Post a Comment Morgan Reynolds The Excavator: Russian Whistleblower Dimitri Khalezov Says U.S. And Russia Are Framing Former Russian Military Officer Viktor Bout 911thology (Dimitri Khalezov) < Video Playlist | Embedr Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition - Full playlist : Terror & 9/11 Part 1 1. Starts off with giving background on Dimitri Khalezov. 2. Show chart from FBI that shows Dimitri is on a terror list of some sort 3. Talks about him being arrested for supplying passport in Bali Bombing…denies charge, never been convicted. Part 2 1. Talks about aluminum cannot penetrate steel structure. Even with speed. 2. Talks about ‘live’ delay of 17 seconds or so, that aided in TV fakery, and how only one video of plane striking and later on more tapes came forward of the second plane, but nothing live, everything is courtesy of someone else. 3. Show screen captures form supposed same camera that has different background colors, and the black frames. 4. Talks about penetrating capabilities of the planes and why they would not penetrate the towers. 5. Talks about how plane should have struck the outside of the building and instead of going in the building it would have been crumpled or broken up and fall to the street below. 6. Talks about the video of the plane that the nose supposedly came out the side, and also that the angle that the plane was supposed to have hit would not match up with the nose coming out even if it was possible, the angle does not match with the actual angle of impact. 7. Talks about TV fakery… evidence is from helicopter journalist who is looking directly at WTC when 2nd plane supposedly hits….People in the studio keep saying they saw a plane… the person on the ground level keeps saying he saw no plane and that it just exploded…the people in the studio tell him it came from the side he wasn’t looking at….absurd, then repeats it several time… just exploded. Part 3 1. Shows different footage of second plane coming in that the angle of the plane coming in do not match from one video to another, some have it coming in at one angle and others have it coming at other angles. Says this points to digital manipulation. 2. Talks about the form of impact hole. Says that it does not match up with a plane hitting there. 3. Talks about why the 9/11 commission had to report what they did. They had to invent a cover up story……this is explained why later in the interview. 4. Talks about the official story, jet fuel, weakened steel, collapse…..and why it isn’t true. Show the people standing in the impact hole, and if tower was burning hot enough to compromise the steel how was this woman, and others standing there holding on to steel beams? 5. Talks about the jet fuel having been mostly burned off at impact….if there was an impact….maybe jet fuel was also planted with the bombs. ------------------ not exactly so. I said in context of discussion that the fuel should have burn out by the time of the Tower’s collapse. The interviewer said that IF there WERE planes? I answered – that it does not matter in this case – if it were planes, or the kerosene was simply brought in the Tower in barrels, irrespectively of the mode of its delivery, it should have been burned out by the time. That’s what I meant. 6. Pentagon was attacked by a Russian Granient Missile (not sure of spelling). Shows trajectory of missile to the pentagon. ---------------- Granit (or Granite) or P-700 missile. You can check that one in Wikipedia. 7. Talks about how a plane could not make the maneuver it was claimed to have….only a missile could have.

8. Says missile would have been launched from Atlantic Ocean….probably 200 to 300 miles out. 9. Says actions of US military prove that attack came from Atlantic because when jets were scrambled they were sent in the direction of the Atlantic. 10. Says missile would be 7 tons and very thick. Flying tank. Speed over 2.5 mach. 11. Exit hole is good evidence of missile. ----------------------- add here that I said that it was an antiship missile, because the way it behaved (attempted to strike the Pentagon at the waterline level) is a typical behavior of antiship missiles. Part 4 1. Says the warhead on the missile would be half megaton thermonuclear warhead. 2. Says mechanics of attack and actions of the military prove it was a missile fired from a ship in the Atlantic. 3. Talks about knowledge of nuclear demolition scheme in the Soviet Union, says he found out in 1994, that the WTC had the nuclear demolition feature. Purpose was because building code of NYC and Chicago in the 60’s would not allow skyscrapers to be built unless the designer also submitted a plan to demolish the building in case it was ever necessary in the future. Side note….this actually makes sense to me from a codes standpoint. If you’re going to build it you also have to tell us how you plan to bring it down. Seems logical to me. 4. Talks about how in the 60’s it was more acceptable to use nuclear reactions for civil reasons….power and such….so it is not so farfetched to think that the building codes people would accept this option….it was a demolition option and nothing more… the 60’s people didn’t look at nuclear devices like we do now. 5. Talks about how crazy an idea this is, and that in Russia at the time it was a joke of sorts. 6. Talks about a Treaty between US and Russia for peaceful nuclear explosions. And what they are sometimes used for and why we would have such a treaty. 7. Talks of controversy in the 80’s when someone found blueprints of the WTC and it showed the plans for the nuclear demolition option and this person took it to the press. Side note …. I wander if anyone else remembers this at all or if there is any proof of it. ----------------------- yes, they do. I encounter people quite recently, who also recollected this scandal. There was an argument over removal my article on nuclear demolition (not the WTC, but in general) from the Wikipedia and during heated argument I mentioned this particular point to my opponents. One guy from among the opponents also said that know he could also recollect that in the 80s or so there was some discussion on this topic in some US newspapers. Part 5 1. Talks about conversations between Putin and Condie Rice on the morning of 9/11 during the attacks…about a Russian missile, the missile that hit the pentagon. This missile had a nuclear warhead that did not explode…..Side note….this part not explained very well. -------------------- yes, I think that was really the fault of the interviewer – he should have asked why? Then I will answer that the perpetrators intentionally rendered its detonator useless, because it was not their plan – to level Washington DC with a half-megaton explosion. But, at least, I explained it to you personally now. 2. ‘Doomsday’ plane – plane seen flying over White House….never explained officially. White House was evacuated … reported military aircraft but classified. Pentagon insists it is not a military aircraft…no mention in commission report. 3. 6:08 stamp…says US government had no involvement in attacks…was only a victim. 4. Say doomsday plane was sent up to keep government operating… its was designed to do….was designed because of nuclear war. Interesting. ---------------------------- I think I explained it clearly enough in the video. Perhaps, you simply missed the point. The Doomsday plane is a flying command post designed to direct a retaliatory nuclear strike against the Soviet Union, should the latter send its nuclear missiles first and damage stationary U.S. command posts designed to direct such a retaliatory nuclear strike. In case of a nuclear alert all 4 Doomsday planes in various locations of the U.S. must be scrambled at once in a couple of minutes time after receiving a notification of an upcoming nuclear attack against the United States. In no other case they may fly, unless for training/routing checking of their combat readiness only. By the way – strikingly ‘white’ color of this plane is nothing else than the so-called ‘anti-flush white’ designed to protect this aircraft as much as possible from being damaged by thermal radiations of multiple nuclear explosions. It is really a ‘Doomsday plane’ in the full sense of this word. 5. Talks about underground bunker – atomic bunker…talks about how Cheney and Rice and Speaker of the House was ordered to bunker. Says that missile that hit pentagon was supposed to be nuclear and was but did not go off. ---------------------again you missed the point. Cheney and Rice were simply grabbed by the Secret Service agents who broke into their offices and grabbed them both by their hands and by the trousers’ belt (not sure what it was in case of Rice, since she is a woman), nearly lifting them from the ground, and quickly propelled them both downstairs towards the anti-atomic bunker under the White House. So, because of this quick action both – Cheney and Rice have about an extra minute to get to the bunker before the explosion due to occur. In case of the Speaker, he was approached by the Secret Service agents and ordered to run to a helicopter to be urgently re-located to another anti-atomic bunker outside D.C. However,

due to that action should take about 4-5 minutes, he would have no chance to survive – because about the time he was leaving the White House and running to the helicopter pad, the missile struck the Pentagon and supposed to produce a half-megaton nuclear explosion. 6. Tries to explain why doomsday plane has played a part in people saying the US was involved in the initial attacks and not just a cover up of certain events afterwards but failed to realize they were not a part of the attack but the US knew we were under nuclear attack and the government needed to move the skies in order to ensure the government would remain operating during and after a nuclear attack. ----------------------- this point you got well, but it appears to me that I didn’t talk about this particular. But this is true what you say. The skies were cleared not because of planes hijackings, but because of nuclear attack. No doubt. 7. Talks about underground bunker and how the door has supposedly never been closed was closed that day with the government people inside. Cheney and Rice were here and speaker of the house was ordered to another atomic bunker somewhere else because not all officials can be in the same secure location at once. ------------------------ again you missed the point. Cheney and Rice hid into an antiatomic bunker under the White House. Speaker was flown into another anti-atomic bunker – outside D.C. However, the steel anti-atomic door that has never been closed in US history, except on the 9/11, with photo of it shown in that part of the movie, was of neither of the above anti-atomic bunkers. This is the door leading to the protected NORAD’s command post located inside ‘anti-atomic’ Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado. Upon getting notification of upcoming nuclear attack, the then commander of NORAD, Gen. Ralf Eberhart, immediately left his peace-time unprotected command post and moved to his protected command post 12 miles away (he drove by car and unlikely had chance to survive would the real nuclear strike occur at that time) but in any case once he arrived there he ordered to close that door – and that happened for the first time in US history. Part 6 1. Talks about Fireman had no fear of collapse because they knew that the building would not collapse….needed assistance to get people out … but fires could be contained and put out. Plus the fact that fireman know that steel building do not collapse from fire, or planes hitting them. 2. Says WTC’s were ‘pulled’ by nuclear option because of fear of collapse by government after planes hit. Talks about how when he was investigating that the conclusion was that the US brought down the towers out of fear of collapse….but was informed that that wasn’t the case because either type of collapse would have done about the same damage….this discovery is what lead to most of the rest of the discovery’s. He set out to prove that the building were brought down by nuclear demolition because of knowledge he had from his position in the Russian military from years ago ---------------------------you missed the point. Because of my knowledge from military service I knew of the fact the nuclear demolition scheme did exist, but not of the fact that it was actually put to use on the 9/11 ----------, he did that….and then found out about the missing missiles and all the rest mostly as afterthought to his original plan. FBI received info that 3 nuclear warheads were used against US -------------- + info that 2 warheads were allegedly hidden inside the planes that stuck the Twin Towers (or hidden in whatever else that struck the Towers, because as you could notice I am a ‘no-planes’ man, and I guess the FBI follows the ‘no-planes’ version too, at least for their internal work) ----------. In order to avoid an atmospheric nuclear explosion that would have killed millions they brought the buildings down using our own secret nuclear demolition plan for the towers….this is what needed to be hidden along with the fact that 24 Russian missiles with nuclear warheads were missing. ---------------------- 22, not 24. Besides it was different issues – a headache to hide loss of the missiles was the headache of the Russians, not of the Americans. Americans had some headache of their own. 3. Says FBI explanation is that 3 nuclear warheads were aim at US that day…1 one each plane that hit towers and 1 in the missile that hit pentagon. Says that the nuclear underground detonation was ordered because of fear that nukes at top of towers would go off and that would be much more catastrophic than using the built in nuclear demolition option. 4. Reason given that is that atmospheric atomic explosion is more contaminous and destructive than underground detonation. 5. Say if exploded at top would have destroyed Manhattan. ------------- entire New York, not Manhattan. It is half megaton (given that Hiroshima bomb was less than 20 kiloton you can imagine what 500 kiloton is and how much it would destroy). 6. Say FBI says that he is correct about nuclear detonation, but he is incorrect on conclusion of why they brought down towers. 7. Shows news coverage of reporter talking … 3 mins after 2 second explosion…..about how the fire chief of safety – Albert Turi -had told him how many firemen were in the building at the time and of explosions after the impact…..says fire chief thinks first explosion after impact was planted on plane..and second explosion after impact was planted in the building. --------------- what was planted in the plane was “secondary device” as he called it, not ‘explosion’, and the very same kind of “secondary device” was planted in the building,

according to Turi. 8. Live news footage from CNN that shows banner headline at 1003am saying “third explosion shatters world trade center in New York” 9. Show CNN banner about Sears Tower in Chicago being evacuated… mentions to notice that Empire State Building was not being evacuated --- side personal note….empire state building was evacuated sometime between 945am and 1005a….I know this personally because I was working in that building on the 13th floor and descended the stairs to the street to 5th avenue and 33rd st. … and we watch the tower fall from that vantage point at roughly 1013am…I don’t know what the point of mentioning that about the Empire State building really….because honestly everyone at that point had evacuated the tall high rise buildings on their own accord if not ordered to do so….I think he is tying in the fact that the sears tower supposedly has the nuclear demolition option as well….thats why they were evacuated. ---------------------- you did not miss the point, but perhaps you have wrongly interpreted it. The Sears Tower was evacuated because of some CENTRALIZED order, transmitted via channels of Civil Defense system. This was an EVENT. Evacuation of the rest of the building was just a gesture of a good will by their respective owners, perhaps after consultation with local security specialists. It can’t be considered as an EVENT in the abovementioned sense. See the difference? 10. At 1013am Breaking CNN news is that the third explosion has collapsed the first tower (but second tower hit) Part 7 1. Says it is not correct to use term nuclear weapon…weapons are designed to kill people this was a nuclear demolition device … but he does say ‘still it was a nuclear device’ 2. He goes on to talk about how the device would have worked….he wrote an article for Wiki on how to demolish using nuclear device….he didn’t mention WTC … but article was still taken down. 3. He goes on to detail about the nuclear process …. 4. Start explanation at 2:43 mark….. 5. Explains difference between atmospheric explosion and underground explosion. Part 8 1. Cont. from atmospheric and underground nuclear explosion explanation of differences. 2. Discusses how much nuclear force needed to destroy amounts of bedrock. 3. Talks about largest allowed was 150 kiloton was maximum allowed under nuclear demolition treaty talked about in earlier part. 4. Talks about how Russians used nuclear underground detonation to form I think he said ‘glass holes’….but could not make out exactly. ------------------------------- gas holders underground. To keep gas under pressure, because volcanic glass coating walls of underground cavity makes it very useful for that purpose. Part 9 1. Cont. to discuss specifics of what would happen to the blast area underground. 2. Goes into talk about blast waves and why there would have been none and why people on the surface would not be injured by the blast. 3. Talks about radioactive gases escaping to surface eventually…and why tests are done in remote places. 4. Talks about how some radioactive particles would be filtered out by the time it reaches surface and says could still get radioactive exposure for two weeks after from an atomic underground blast at 500m underground with a 150 kiloton nuclear device. Says that the epicenter would continue to be radioactive for … deadly radioactive for 3 years. Says the epicenter would stay hot for 1 year with a 150kiloton device. 5. Points out why the underground nuclear explosion is not comparable to Hiroshima. 6. Points out that example given are for typical underground devices for test…. 7. Starts to go into details about specifics of WTC nuclear demolition. 8. Says for WTC would be 50m under the tower foundation…explained in a min later that because of basements of 27m that the device would have been placed 77m from the ground surface. 9. This would make tower lose its foundation and thus melt the steel of the foundation and bring down everything above. Part 10 1. Talks about how we would not hear anything on the surface when it was detonated, but would feel the ground shake. 2. Richter scale measurement chart displayed…..5.5 on scale is a 80 kiloton explosion equivalent 3. Displays quote of Battalion Chief Brian O’Flaherty who says of being in the Marriott Hotel “I hear a noise. Right after that noise, you could feel the building start to shudder, tremble, under your feet” then the tower came down. 4. Shows Clip of tower shaking before the collapse….its the 12 second video that is focused on the damage zone….anyone who know 9/11 truth or otherwise has seen it….camera is on tripod….frames shake for several seconds and 10 seconds later the tower is crumbling. 5. Goes into details of how the damage would have been created by the blast zone expanding.. 6. Damage zone – up to 350 meters from ground surface….says building would be damaged or broken up into smaller pieces. 7. Immediately after that up to 300m from ground and everything in that zone would be turned to microscopic dust. 8. This is explaining why there was little left of the towers the only part that would not have been affected by the blast is the very upper floors, about ? of the towers…everything else was reduced to dust. Part 11 1. Shows a good graphic to explain part 10 of actual damaged tower and what zones would have been turned to what and why the collapse looks like it did because of the way the towers were affected by nuclear device. 2. 2:55 mark discusses why they call it ground zero – ‘the place

on the earth’s surface directly at, below, or above the explosion of a nuclear bomb. The American Heritage Desk Dictionary (edition 1981) Side note – merrian-webster still defines it this way as definition number one. [link to] -------------------- however, this one added also a definition No.2 to dilute the clear original meaning. Before the 9/11 it was one single meaning. 3. Shows example of how new dictionaries have changed the definition of the ground zero since 9/11. Uses Logan’s dictionary, I have never heard of them, but it is a real example. ---------------- not Logan, but Longman – it is a very famous dictionary company. About as famous as Webster or Oxford and perhaps more famous than the American Heritage. I am very surprised that you have never heard of it. 4. Talks about how the definitions were changed after ward to talk about bombs and severe damage as to not remind people of its real pre-9/11 meaning. 5. Talks about why the dust would not be radioactive. 8:20 mark. In atmosphere dust would become radioactive but not underground because it’s the pressure of the nuclear device that turned the materials to dust not radiation blast. Part 12 1. Explains how radioactive vapors escaped after the collapse and the vapors that continued after the blast for several weeks was radioactive. 2. Shows pictures of Fireman looking in the hole with the vapors coming out, and that they breathed it in and also had direct contact -------------------- not direct contact by were subjected to direct radiation --------. Says health problems would arise, will talk about that in further parts. 3. Says most of the dust was steel dust, and the rest would be concrete, office materials, wires, and people, but the majority of the towers were steel and that was the major component of the dust. 4. Goes into temperatures….150 kiloton at 500m would take one year to cool, talks about vapors coming out 6-8 weeks later and is still red hot, 3 months later finding molten steel in the debris. 5. Discredits thermite theory. Thermite could not sustain the high temps, and cannot turn steel to dust. 6. Ask why more experts haven’t come out to question commission report. Explanation is that it is physiological. Part 13 1. Talks about why people of knowledge agree to official story, even though they know from education that events could not have happened from plane crashes. 2. The Second ‘truth’ about 9/11 – explanation given to experts who question 9/11 … all the 3 wtc buildings have been demolished by ‘al-queda’using 3 stolen soviet made portable nuclear devices RA-115/Ra-116 (aka ‘mini nukes’) which the ‘al-qaeda’ had planted into the 3 wtc buildings in advance. 3. Show quotes from Spanish article about how 3 mini nukes were used to destroy the wtc towers including tower 7….thus blaming even tower 7 on bin laden, and not from damage from debris from the twin towers. 4. The 9/11 commission was advised to not report this to the people because of fear of public panic over mini nukes. Russia was said to have made 700 suitcase nukes and 100 were missing. The ones that the bin laden supposedly used were gotten from the Ukraine, according to this interview. ----------------- not according to my interview, but according to Spanish “El Mundo” newspaper, article “Mi Hermano Bin Laden, Tragedia, Apocalipsis, New York” of 16 Sept 2001. 5. Says that the US had to use the built in demolition option to bring down the towers because they were given info that the planes carried nukes that would detonate at the top of the towers, and the atmospheric blast would have destroyed Mahattan and surrounding and they really had no choice. Remember from earlier he says the US is a victim in 9/11 but because of public fear of the suitcase nuke they had to cover the real story. Basically. 6. Talking about why firefighters would allow for a cover up. If nukes went off at top of building millions would have been killed. The firefighters, etc had to go with it, and the truth is only top officials would have even know of the nuclear option. 7. Says thousands of people would have to keep secret. 8. Talks about disagreements amongst experts …. Paid experts and non paid. Part 14 1. Talks about materials being shipped out without examination for investigation….partly out of radiation concerns. ----------------------------- not in this sense, but in a sense as to prevent any independent study of the materials that could reveal radioactivity. 2. 1:25 starts to talk about WTC 7 and its collapse and omission from Commission report. 3. Starts explanation of why WTC 7 collapse would look different from the twin towers. 4. Explains blast zone and because 7 was smaller the dust zone reached to the top of WTC 7, so it did not have the top damage zone that the blast would create. 5. Shows BBC live footage were the reporter says he has reports that the Solomon (sp? WTC7) has collapsed….this is not the famous footage of the women with WTC 7 behind her and the feed is lost, this is voice over from the male anchor in studio over live footage of Collapse areas. ---------- yes, this is indeed a different footage than the one with the woman, because the one with the woman would be at 5.07 PM EST, while this one was aired at 4.56 PM EST. By the way – woman also called the WTC-7 as “Salomon Brothers Building” in that famous clip you mentioned. 6. Give report of warning from British foreign office to British citizens that there is a ‘strong risk of further atrocities in NYC.’ 24 mins after this is when the building actually collapsed. ---------------------- side note

“atrocity” and “atrocious device” are jargon words in secret services’ jargon that are actually mean “mini-nuclear bombing” (usually reported to plebs as “truck-bombing” or “car-bombing” – like the one in Oklahoma or in Kenya and Tanzania cases), while “atrocious device” usually refers to a “mini-nuke” in the same jargon. It is just for you own reference. Just in case. 7. Says WTC 7 housed the nuclear devices that were used to demolish all three. 8. Tunnels from WTC 7 to 1 and 2 would be how the devices were delivered for detonation. 9. Explains why first collapse was of second hit tower and second collapse was by first hit tower. 10. Shows map of WTC complex…explains that WTC 2 is farther from WTC 7 and if they would have collapsed WTC 1 first then the blast wave for WTC 1 would have destroyed the tunnel over to WTC 2 from building 7. So tower 2 had to come down first, because had tower 1 come down first….tower 2 would probably still be standing today. 11. WTC 7 was destroyed because if it wasn’t then it would have been discovered about the nuclear demolition option for skyscrapers that was put into place decades earlier. The public couldn’t find out about nukes being used for demolition. 12. Concludes that the US is reacting to an attack and in response to that attack does something it needs to cover up (nuclear demolition of skyscraper, with people still in them btw, to save nuclear detonation in skyscraper that would get into the atmosphere and kill millions). Part 15 1. Why cover it up? The American people would not accept that killing 3000 people in order to save millions was acceptable. That could never be revealed to the public, even if it was done to protect millions. -------------------------------------- I did not mean this. In fact, the American public perhaps WOULD accept that it is better to kill the 3000 than to let be killed 6 million, because it is simply reasonable and the American public is not so devoid of any reason as might appear. I meant not this. I meant that the American public would never accept an idea that the nuclear devices did under the Twin Towers in the first instance. Because of bureaucrats from the Department of Buildings and because of stupid clause in the building code? That what I meant. 2. Why then create 2 wars over the cover up? Explanation given by me….Rahm Emmanuel I believe said ‘you can never let a disaster go to waste’ or something to that effect. --------------------- in fact, I explained why the wars should have taken place. In order to distract public attention from nuclear explosion in Manhattan to something else (wars). And I put an example –after the nuclear explosion in Beirut in 1983 (for plebs referred to as a “truck-bombing” of Beirut Marine barracks), the very next day the US Government launched Grenada invasion – just to distract the public attention from the nuclear blast in Beirut towards occupation of Grenada. But that one was a small mini-nuke explosion, so the war was smaller. Here were 3x 150 kiloton explosions, so wars should be bigger in scale – to distract public attention appropriately. That what I meant to say. 3. Says WTC 7 was destroyed because it was the base of operation (and housed the devices) that would deploy the nuke device if it was ever needed, it was destroyed to hide that fact and that fact alone. The fact that Secret Service and many other government buildings were housed there is just a coincidence. 4. Talks about alarm system that should be in place for this nuclear demolition option that should have been deployed that morning was disabled. Mentions a timeline that should take place from when the device are put in place and detonation. 5. Side note…..the above point is not clear on the time line…and an interesting video edit is made right after Dimitri says he thinks that that part of the demolition is a conspiracy…and then edit. ---------------------------------------- there was a special alarm system based on WTC-7 that was designed to produce alarm signals towards the WTC-1 and -2 should the nuclear demolition scheme of the Twins become activated (to my knowledge there should be at least 20 minutes, perhaps even 25 minutes, between the press of the Red Button and till the time of actual nuclear explosion. So, all this time some continuous alarm signal should have been transmitted towards the dangerous areas urging everyone immediately to get out. This system for some not so-clear reason was put in “test mode” very early in the morning of the 9/11 and so all signals produced by it (if any at all) should have been ignored. That is official information. So, when he asked me why would they disable the alarm system, I answered that in my opinion it was some kind of conspiracy. I didn’t’ specify, but I think that Larry Silverstein was a part of the 9/11 gang from the very beginning and it was his order to disable the alarm system. However, I don’t have any proof of it. It is only a suspicion. So, I say it is in my opinion only. 6. Talks of damage to a building behind WTC 7, Fiterman Hall, because of where the nuke device would have been placed because of the shape of WTC7, shows Google search and link that says that this building is being decontaminated. Then another that shows the building was demolished. Shows quotes from article about the building, EPA ‘Fiterman’s got to go’. 7. Explains why post office and Verizon on either side of WTC7 were not damaged…because of placement of device and blast zone. 8. Show where he believes nuke charges would have been placed under WTC 1 and 2 9. Explains why some of the corner structures seemed to have ‘survived’. Part 16 1.

Explains why damage would look like it did based on location of device. 2. Explains why the blast wave only affected the structure and didn’t produce and ‘outside’ blast wave. 3. Gives example of another French scientist who gave same equations he did about blast waves, but they differed on why and how….but the calculations were the same for the damage. 4. French scientist says that there was a nuclear reactor under the WTC complex…this is where the two men disagree, Dimitri and the French Scientist. 5. Shows article from 3 Dec. 2001, 12 weeks after, that says Deputy Chief Charles Biaich of New York Fire Department would not predict when the last fire might be extinguished. 6. Says same hotspots were found under WTC 7 7. Talks about the way the fires were extinguished in WTC1 and 2 were the same that had to be used to put out WTC 7 underground fires weeks later, says this proves that all 3 were brought down by the same method. ---------------------- also in the same interview with Blaich it is said that underground fires were not typical and represented a mass of mixed combustible materials as deep as 50 meters. Very important point that you have missed. Also you missed the point that in the same interview it was said that two apparent radioactivity absorbents were mixed into waters of firefighters and used to extinguish ‘underground fires’ under spots of the WTC -1, -2 and… 7. Part 17 1. Starts off with report from Pentagon where reporter is talking about small debris, and the collapse of the wall that happened 45 mins later. ----------------------------- in this interview, in fact, the CNN reporter clearly explains that there was no plane in the Pentagon’s case. Very clear. 2. Goes into Russian missile he says is used for pentagon attack. 3. Says Russian officials new missiles had been stolen but had to cover that up. ------- you perhaps mean “knew”, not ‘new’. 4. Talks about missing submarine, also, im having trouble following this part and how it is all a part of this. I guess it background on where the missiles came from….. 5. Shows article about nuclear powered vessel ‘Kursk’ and test it conducted with firing them. -------------- it seems that you completely missed my point here. What I meant that after salvaging the sunken submarine, the Russian officials made a kind of ‘production’ by claiming that missiles’ silos can not be opened, because it was allegedly too dangerous – just in order to hide the fact that the missiles were no longer in their silos and the silos were empty. Then the Russians proceeded to cutting the silos ‘as is’ from the body of the submarine using welding and then, without opening the empty silos, brought them to some remote location and destroyed them with mini-nukes without opening – so to hide completely the fact that the missiles were stolen. Two Russian newspapers articles (with English translation of both) are provided that confirm this seemingly insane claim. Part 18 1. Talking about the missing Russian missiles, 22 or 24 total, interviewer asking what they are doing with the, he says breaking them down possibly because uranium and plutonium are very valuable, or expensive. -------------------------the matter of expensive nuclear materials arises because of the question whether it would be reasonable to destroy the missiles and their warheads by ‘mini-nuking’ them, instead of disassembling and finding some other good use of the expensive nuclear materials inside the warheads. It seems you again completely missed the point. 2. Side note….i still am confused about who stole or acquired the Russian missiles, and who actually deployed them against the US. I am following why he thinks its is underground nukes, but after 180 mins or so, I sure be clear on WHO attacked us….if it wasn’t a self inflicted wound, was it the Russians? ---------------------- I didn’t mention it in the interview, but only mentioned that it was not he Americans. But for you personally I can tell who it was. It was the Freemasons in collaboration with the Israeli Mossad. 3. Talking about the missile test from the Kurst was to cover up the fact that 20 some Russian missiles were missing. 22 were missing, 1 was used on the pentagon, and that leaves 20 missing missiles with 500kiloton nuclear warheads on them. They are saying the US gov’t knew this because Russia had told them under the nuclear agreements. ----------------------- no, I have never said that the Russians confessed to the Americans that the missile that stuck the Pentagon was stolen from Kursk. To the best of my knowledge until today the official interpretation of events is still different than my claims. The Russian claim (secretly of course) that these Granit missiles were stolen by some bad Russian guy from Ukrainian warehouse of the Black Sea Fleet and sold to Saddam Hussein. In fact, my claims about Kursk affair are extremely embarrassing for both – the Russians and the Americans, because they knock down the already established version of the ‘truth’. 4. Talking about how he has given all this info to the government and no one has even ask him anything, reason he says is because they already know it all. Says he is prepared to go to court and prove his position about 9/11 and the missing missiles that are caring the massive nuclear warheads. 5. This is where a cover up comes into play. If the US knows this information and is not letting the public know. He is saying that the higher ups are not allowing the grunts to investigate his truthful claims because if they do they would discover what he has discovered. 6. The interviewer says he believes that the US is ignoring his claims

because the US knows he is correct AND that the US isn’t worried about the missing 20 missiles because we know where they are. Part 19 1. Talking about why Americans or others can’t buy that it is a nuclear device because there was no mushroom cloud, or massive reading of radiation. People expect Hiroshima when they hear about nuclear detonation, but that is above ground. The nuclear detonation is different above ground. 2. They go into the timeframe of first impact, second impact, pentagon strike, and that a decision had to be made very quickly for the nuclear demolition, Dimitri says this does fit the time line because the US knows of the missing missiles and the possibility of nuclear detonation in the atmosphere so they decided very quickly to use the demolition option that was built in. 3. Side note….Dimitri says the US was absolutely certain that the planes had the mini nukes on them….-------------------- not ‘mini-nukes’ but 500 kiloton thermo-nuclear warheads, akin to that found in the Pentagon ------------------also much earlier it was discussed that planes could not ‘penetrate’ the WTC towers and cut threw them like butter, they should have impacted and basically fallen to the ground…..i remember the videos that show the plane that possibly had the ‘pod’ under it that makes a flash a micro second before it impacted…..maybe it had to shoot the device into the building because otherwise it would have fallen to the street level, most likely. ------------- yes, but this is MY PERSONSL opinion that planes were digital. However, at the 9/11 an OFFICIAL version of events was that there were planes (or missiles if not planes) that struck the WTC. So, for the FBI by then it sounded reasonable. Now, perhaps, they realized already it was just BS, but it is simply to late to change the story now. 4. Shows clip of news report about safety Chief Albert Turi about devices planted in the building. 5. Says this confirms that they were aware of bombs on the plane….and in the tower, because they knew of the nuclear demolition option. 6. Side note – Dimitri says earlier that he believes the TV fakery angle as well, or evidence points to it, and possibly no planes at all, because there is evidence of that, like it or not, but now he talks about how the safety chief saying he believes the planes had bombs and the building had pre planted bombs…doesn’t that contradict itself? I am a little confused on the stance here…..and how those could both be true, TV fakery and bombs on the plane. ------------------- no, it does not contradict. Because it is MY PERSONAL opinion that there were no planes (and no warheads either). However, in opinion of the FBI officials then there were both – ‘planes’ and ‘warheads’ (another version – missiles, instead of planes, and warheads). It is simply because my personal opinion (as of today) is very different from the contemporary FBI opinion (as of the September the 11). 7. Goes back to Sears’s tower being evacuated and other events around 835 and beyond. 8. They are talking about the sears tower being ordered evacuated at 1002a, 3 mins after the first collapse. They say the Empire State Building and Trump Towers and other building were not evacuated. This is not true, I know for a fact. I worked in the Empire State Building on 9/11 on the 13th floor facing the twin towers. I stated this above. Sometime around 940 am the building was ordered evacuated. An announcement came over the intercom that was building wide and said that everyone should evacuate the building…I believe it mentioned it was ok to use elevators, because I chose the stairs. I did not evacuate immediately, me and a co-worker stayed for a few mins longer and the announcement was made again..we then took the stairs to the lobby where everyone from our office met in the intersection….the middle of the road….5th ave. and 33rd st. We could see the tops of the twin towers and after being there for not long…ten or fifteen mins the first tower came down…we could see the smoke rushing down the streets..even from that far away. So I don’t know why they have mentioned this twice already, but it is not true, at least for the empire state building. It may not have made the news crawl but we were ordered evacuated. And actually the building was closed the next day…and for 2 weeks after that we were evacuated several times for bomb scares. ------------------------- and again, you have to distinguish by the scale of these events. Evacuation of the Empire State building was a local matter. Evacuation of the Sears Tower – by the centralized order, transmitted by channels of the civil defense system. See the difference? Just to make it easier to understand – in the 9/11 there were actually 2 distinctly different orders to ground all aircraft. One – by orders of respective airlines flight dispatchers (local matter) – because of fear of hijackings. The other – centralized order by the NORAD (centralized command SCATANA) – because of necessity to immediately clear all skies because of atomic alert and expectation of massive arrival of enemy missiles and enemy aircraft. That is about the same huge difference between the order to evacuate the Sears Tower and the order to evacuate the Empire State Building. While the second one was evacuated merely because of fear of possible terror actions, the first one was evacuated clearly in connection with implementation of a nuclear demolition scheme of the WTC. Hope, you realize how huge is the difference between these two events. 9. Saying that Sear’s tower was evacuated because it had the same built in design of nuclear

demolition and they had to evacuate just in case it was also a target, to save lives. Again, this contradicts the TV fakery, unless there were pre planted bombs in the tower that were not nuclear that started the event, and to explain that they added the planes so mentally people would be able to handle the towers coming down. Unfortunately people are ignorant and they assume that a plane hitting a building would bring it down, its easy to deceive ignorant people. But I am still confused about how the TV fakery can also mesh with the bombs on the planes, etc. ------------------ no, it does not contradict that. It was simply because it was so awful thing to do – to nuke the Tower with life beings still in it, that no normal person would allow other live beings to continue to remain in the Sears Tower with a similar 150 kiloton nuke underneath it just because no plane yet hit the Sears Tower. Just think about it from this point of view. 10. Says he knows from his work experience that the twin towers for sure had the nuclear demolition option and heard rumors that the sears tower did as well, and on Sept. 11 when it was evacuated that is when he knew, because they were afraid that the sears tower was a target that day as well, thus they evacuated it in case they needed to bring it down. Side note…seems like they waited a long time to evacuate, when the first tower came down, if they knew they were a target because of the nuclear demolition option. ----------------- about the last I can ‘t comment, because I don’t know. Part 20 1. Talking about other government having known a nuclear device went off based on seismic readings and knows how to interpret those reading. 2. Says that seismic readings are not that of the nuclear devices… short that it is bogus evidence that has been put out to distract or discredit the nuclear demolition theory. ------------------ no, probably, you missed the point. These bogus seismograms clearly represented two mini-nukes explosions (perhaps 1 kiloton each in underground parking lots) and as such this bogus evidence was depicted to represent the same story as published by the Spanish “El Mundo” newspaper – that the Twins were nuked by Osama bin Laden, using stolen Soviet mini-nukes. 3. Give quoted testimony of Bradley Mann, EMS, “Shortly before the first tower came down I remember feeling the ground shaking. I heard a terrible noise, and then the debris just started flying everywhere.’ 4. Says the seismic reading put out paired with the testimony of witnesses proves that the seismic reading are false because the ground wouldn’t shake at a 2.2 it would take a 5-5.5 for the ground to shake or rumble. 5. Give more quotes of ground shaking from Fire Patrolman Paul Curran 6. Shows what people feel from different seismic level and what forces can cause seismic reading other than natural earthquake…or what an earthquake’s equivalent man made force would be. Part 21 1. Going back to TV fakery….they show the video of the man on the street smoking and responding to the plane hitting the building. The question is ‘Is he reacting to the plane hitting or is he reacting simply to an explosion that did not involve a plane?’ I have to say even before the video slowed it down that has always been my reaction to him, he should have heard the plane coming in from that low well before he reacted. I know sound reaches us later than the event, but his reaction, to me, is that of only an explosion and no plane. 2. Shows live footage of witnesses who are questioning a reporter saying it was a plane, the witness says it was a bomb, the reporter who is also right there….says it was a plane ‘we saw it on tv’…..but the witness is adamant that it was a bomb. -------------- you missed the very first witness – a woman interviewed by Dick Oliver as shown by CNN, who clearly saw that the explosion was INSIDE, and she repeated it twice – INSIDE. Very important. 3. Shows footage of President Bush news conference talking about how explosives were designed to go off where people above could not escape…..this may be somewhat misleading. When he is referring to the explosive going off higher point to prevent from escaping….his use of explosive could be referring to the planes being used as explosive…..not sure how much credence that adds … but it doesn’t take any away. 4. Says that the original planes with the people on them were ditched in the ocean. ------------------ no, I said that the planes were empty of passengers, not full of them. 5. Shows footage again with a witness on the phone…the tv is showing a plane coming in toward the tower one is reacting to seeing this incoming plane…then the fire ball, then everyone reacts, studio people and live witness on the phone, never a mention of an incoming plane….the person on the phone then starts saying the building just blew up, never mentioning a plane. He is then put on ‘pause’ according the in studio voice over. 6. The video points out that the ‘live’ shot from CNN indicates it is live by a red banner with the word LIVE in white capital letters…as the plane approaches the tower until the fireball the LIVE banner is there, then 12 frames (not seconds) of complete black screen, when the ‘live’ shot is returned the red ‘LIVE’ banner is now missing. When they come back to the ‘live’ feed the red banner is missing and replaced by a blue ‘LIVE’ banner. The middle missing ‘live’ banner may be because of a different camera being used….but when they return to the helicopter shot it appears to be from the original live shot with the red banner. This to me, as small as it is, says a lot. The devil is in the details. I know

people hate the TV fakery part of this, and I don’t know why, all angles should be safe for discussion, but this is a small little smoking pistol to me in that argument. ---------------- thanks for noticing that. 7. Shows live footage from helicopter to the in studio people, Charles Gibson I believe by the voice, in studio they see a plane, the witness says he does not see a plane. Part 22 1. Talking about the Shanksville crash site….Dimitri says that 2 of the planes were shot down. I’m confused about which other plane was shot down. They are saying a lot about United reporting to planes down but not saying where. ----------------- I thought I made it clear – two planes were shot down – the one later assigned to the Pentagon and the Flight 93. Besides, I did not state that they were shot down, I said I suspect that they were shot down. 2. Talks about cell towers and about how mobile calls would not have been able from high altitude flying planes. 3. Talks about why he knows the trade center were nuclear demolitions, but his main research was not on the plane or no plane theory. Just that the building were ultimately destroyed by the nuclear demolition. 4. Says United 93 was shot down by ‘cannon’ … I think they mean by bullets type projectiles and not missile type because US missile could not shoot down a friendly aircraft, it would have to be done by ‘cannon’. Side note….they may not be saying cannon, it is hard for me to tell. ----------- yes, what I meant was ‘cannon’. Part 23 1. Talking about hijackers and that some are alive and some have alibis, one was a Pakistan ISI agent, and one was a Christian. 2. Says that if the 9/11 commission is reporting these 19 hijackers are responsible then the entire commission is false because some of the named and pictured hijackers are alive. 3. Talks about the found passport, unburned and intact. 4. Talks about Pakistan ISI and the $100000 wire transfer and why the FBI didn’t look at ISI, considering the director was in the US during the attacks, he would have been easy to detain and question. --------- at least to question – even without detaining J 5. Talks again that the US was a victim put in a desperate situation that it then had to cover up. 6. Talks about how the US tried its best to tie Saddam Hussein and couldn’t. 7. Talks about how FBI has not evidence against bin laden. Only wanted for crimes outside the US which means he didn’t have anything to do with 9/11 Part 24 1. Talks about the blast crater and the temps again. What the hole would have been filled with since then. Side note – a problem I have with this nuclear theory is that the sub levels were not completely destroyed……the mall underground was intact for the most part. I think the Lauder Brothers movie showed footage of fireman walking around in the Mall area, and the Path station and subway station. If everything above ground was turned to dust from ground level to 300 meters up….why wasn’t the 27 meters of sub levels also turned to dust? Based on the graphics shown in the interviews everything from 27m underground up to 300 meters above ground should have been turned to dust….including the parking garages, mall, mechanical rooms, etc. But they weren’t why is that? -------------------------- note my drawing in regard to the destruction zone around the WTC-7 – where I explained that it slightly touched the Fitterman Hall, but spared both – Verizon and the U.S. Post Office – despite of them being dangerously close to the WTC-7. As you can see from that diagram, the nukes were quite precise and both nukes produced similar destruction zones around the Twins, sparing the rest of environment. I don’t see any contradiction at all. 2. Talking about what should be found underground. Saying if they dug underground that we would find ‘volcanic’ glass. Testing would show radioactivity. --------------------------------- but not the radioactivity of volcanic glass. Volcanic glass does not retain any atomic structure, nor radioactivity. It is former plasma now set solid. What might retain atomic structure and radioactivity – is former liquid materials, apart of plasma. I think you have to listen to that what I said again. 3. Talks about a NYC detective that contracted leukemia and had a bone marrow transplant. Bone marrow is the first part affected by radiation. He had worked at ground zero and freshkills landfill, an article written about him brings up question of why certain FBI agents would come dressed in full HazMat protection and everyone else had simple face masks. 4. Talks about some Dr.’s assigned to these cases would have to have signed a non disclosure agreement because they would know that these people had been exposed to radiation. Part 25 1. Talking about how people are subject to radiation and how long it would take for them to feel sick. Describes how much radiation it would take for it to affect you immediately or later on. 2. Talking about how the levels subsided over a few months. Explains how the body absorbs radiation and the government knew they needed to take measures to make sure people were not overexposed. 3. Talks about reports of radiation tests being done daily at ground zero….when workers would show levels above what they wanted he was removed from the pile and reassigned. 4. Says levels workers were exposed to would have taken some time to manifest into symptoms. Part 26 1. Talks about how Dr.’s would explain blood diseases and such as reactions from asbestos and other toxins from the office materials burning. 2. Talks about how there were not ‘fires’ underground, but extremely hot molten materials. 3. Says the vapors would

continue to escape as long as the material was still hot. Once cooled the hole would have been filled with something to reduce any further seepage of radiation. 4. Talks about how residents would be affected…..but not as badly because they were kept away for six months. Side note – we don’t know the effects of residents, they are not tracked like the firefighters. 5. Talks about why Dr.’s should be able to know something was wrong because residents were coming with problems…but again Dr.’s would not look for radiation poisoning, but would look for asbestos and other materials. 6. Talks about images of vapors from spaces….points out the hotspots where the detonation would have been placed and thermal images prove this. 7. Talks about other experts who came to same conclusion as him and they didn’t know what he knew about the nuclear demolition option. Read more: 9/ - Third Truth about 9/11 re-directs backups.


back to top

Articles on the WTC Open Minds Forum - 9/11 Tower Pulverizations Explained - Nuked Facts not Fairies Parts 1-26 explained (excellent) Facts not Fairies Parts 1-26 explained (excellent) v2 911 explained - Dimitri Khalezov (1of2 Full) | Frequency 911 explained - Dimitri Khalezov (2of2) | Frequency 911 Footage | See for yourself the coverage of 9/11 Anonymous Physicist Anonymous Physicist Author Of: The Nuclear Destruction of the World Trade Center and The China Syndrome Aftermath and Quarantine: Mankind Held Hostage: The Ultimate Truth of Hiroshima, 9/11 & Man’s History World Trade Center Demolition: A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence World Trade Center Demolition World Trade Center Demolition: 35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC World Trade Center Demolition: The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories World Trade Center Demolition: On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation, from "Anonymous Physicist" Reality is Stranger Than Fiction: Dimitri Khalezov discusses 9/11 with George Mapp in Bangkok | Dobroyeutro's Blog [video] Dimitri Khalezov - interview about 911 • Political Videos Forum • Smeggy's Forums • Thirdtruth Thread: 911 WTC Nuclear Demolition Part 1 & 2 at Conspiracy Theories Forum (ThreadID: 1600719) Joe O'Toole - wtc heat lasted for months The Great Deception -> * 3rd Theory Of What Happened On 911 Scribd Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff « This is zionism: Dimitri Khalezov's Nuclear Demolition Videos Being Scrubbed Off Web!

Mike Philbin's Free Planet blog: Nuked WTC's Dmitri Khalezov was on the NO PLANES band-wagon early. Banned From YouTube - Videos » 9/11thology The Twin Towers and Building 7 - Nuclear Demolition Charges - Dimitri Khalezov 2of2 - Stagevu: Your View Statement of Dr. Peter Leitner before the Joint Economic Committee 9110502.PDF (application/pdf Object) 9110210.PDF (application/pdf Object) 9110129.PDF (application/pdf Object) Killtown: Banned at PrisonPlanet forum Killtown: Banned from Dimitri Khalezov on 9-11 | Veterans Today Dimitri Khalezov | Veterans Today Ground Zero | Veterans Today GORDON DUFF: 9/11 AND THE TWO STAGE “KHALEZOV EFFECT” | Veterans Today DIMITRI KHALEZOV: BIO-TERRORISM AND ANTHRAX | Veterans Today DIMITRI KHALEZOV: CHERNOBYL and MANHATTAN | Veterans Today Balancing the 9/11 Account- The Military | Veterans Today ll_0573.pdf (application/pdf Object) ll33of2007.pdf (application/pdf Object) -- See Local Law 33-2007 (See Title 27, Chapter 1 113.0 Art 14) NYC demolotion bylaw ... 9bee2e75.jpg (JPEG Image, 599x841 pixels) a77ac1ea.jpg (JPEG Image, 450x661 pixels) article-1060043-02C3FC4B00000578-535_468x314_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x472 pixels) World Trade Center plowshar.pdf (application/pdf Object) elmundo_binladen.pdf (application/pdf Object) El Mundo - Mi hermano Bin Laden Phone Call to Dimitri- 911 Nuclear Demolitions – Re-edited This is zionism: Dimitri Khalezov's Nuclear Demolition Videos Being Scrubbed Off Web! Blogger: This is zionism - Post a Comment The Third Truth by Dimitri Khalezov - 911thology Did Nukes Take down the twin towers and building 7 on 9-11? Uncensored Magazine | 911 ~ Gordon Duff Interviews Dimitri Khalezov 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 01 of 26 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE ***** - Page 34

Dimitri Links

back to top

Dimitri_Khalezov - index of all files Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov, a former Soviet citizen, a former commissioned officer of the so-called “military unit 46179”, otherwise known as “the Special Control Service” of the 12th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry of the USSR. The Special Control Service, also known as the Soviet atomic (later “nuclear”) intelligence was a secret military unit responsible for detecting of nuclear explosions (including underground nuclear tests) of various adversaries of the former USSR as well as responsible for controlling of observance of various international treaties related to nuclear

testing and to peaceful nuclear explosions. After September the 11th Khalezov undertook some extensive 9/11 research and proved that the Twin Towers of World Trade Center as well as its building 7 were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions – which earned the very name “ground zero” to the demolition site. Moreover, he testifies that he knew about the in-built so-called “emergency nuclear demolitions scheme” of the Twin Towers as long ago as back in the ‘80s – while being a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service. 3rd_truth_book_dimitri_khalezov_presentation_jn_1.wmv (video/x-ms-wmv Object) !_Debunking_the_debunkers-_famous_physicist_Jan_Zeman_vs_infamous_impostor_Dimitri_Khalezov.pdf Welcome to the personal web site of Dimitri A. Khalezov. The 3rd Truth about 9/11 Mr. Dimitri A. Khalezov ( in Russian: ??????? ?????????? ??????? ), an author of: "The Third Truth about September 11.." research book, could be contacted as follows: Directly (preferable): telephone in Bangkok , Thailand: +66851230760; +668-05960711; +662-776039451 or by E-mail: dkhalezov(a) (preferable) or dkhalezov(a) ( please, make sure to replace (a) for @ in the above E-mail addresses) or via CipherWall Network - send you requests to the following CWID: 1-7778 (Dimitri K) or via ICQ: 448400378 Or via his lawyer: Mr. Lak Nitiwattanawichan. LAK & ASSOCIATES, 333, Soi 40, Phahlyouthin Road, Senanikom, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. Tel/Fax: +662-5792733, Mobile: +6687-0227078 Latest contact information, if changed, could also be found on the same page - it will be updated accordingly. 911thology Dimitri Khalezov ground zero radiation sickness. 9/11thology - Forum video_Dimitri_Khalezov_911thology_download_links Videos: 9/11 Truth Is Out - WTC Was Destroyed By 3 Thermo-Nuclear Explosions - Dimitri Khalezov Interview + The Third Truth PDF | Love for Life 911thology Nuclear demolition is another kind of controlled demolition. Please, note: even though this web site deals with purely technical matters and it has absolutely nothing to do with any politics, it might still be considered being "politically incorrect". So, a possibility exists that this site could be removed one day by authorities and such a prospect can not be ignored. If so happens, you would be able to find a reference to a new source here: (note, it is a *.cn domain, not *.com ), or you could search the Internet by '9/11thology' keyword and you would always find some related info. Nuclear demolition of skyscrapers. ============ . . . . . ============ This article describes a general concept of nuclear demolition of skyscrapers - particularly in connection with known thermo-nuclear demolition schemes of the World Trade Center in New York and that of the Sears Tower in Chicago. Though, the current article does not deal with any exact details of implementation of this concept in regard to these particular structures, but provides rather general knowledge on this subject. Besides, this article does not consider any conspiracy behind nuclear demolition of the WTC on 9/11, neither does it consider any moral aspect of this issue - such as ground zero clean-up works and so on - it aims to explain its purely technical aspect. However, there are other articles available in the Internet that describe the WTC nuclear demolition scheme in more or less exact detail, as well as articles that describe particular conspiracy in regard to the actual WTC demolition links to these articles are available at the end of the current description. Nuclear demolition of skyscrapers was patented by " Controlled Demolition Inc." - the most renowned demolition company that deals with controlled demolition of buildings, and especially with controlled demolition of skyscrapers. The same company was a primary designer of nuclear demolition projects of the World Trade Center in New York and of the Sears Tower in Chicago. Photo: South Tower begins to collapse. The author of this article - Dimitri A. Khalezov, a former officer the Soviet nuclear intelligence, officially known as the Special Control Service of the 12th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry.

The WTC demolition: atomic demolition vs nuclear demolition. WTC controlled demolition: thermite, 'explosives' and myths. The WTC controlled demolition was, in fact, 'uncontrolled'.. WTC demolition videos show Towers collapses in good detail. 9/11thology forum Download links for 911thology video. 911thology Dimitri Khalezov video DVD download


back to top

from dimitri YouTube - 911 CNN -- poll: 66% of US citizens agree to forgo their liberties 9 11 Truth- Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov & Gordon Duff Discuss - YouTube Dimitri Khalezov blames MOSSAD for 911 - YouTube Dimitri Khalezov videos - SENSE TUBE THE Third Truth (9781409288534): Dimitri Khalezov: Books Phone Call to Dimitri- 911 Nuclear Demolitions - Re-edited - YouTube 911Nuclear Demolition telephone interview to Dimitri Dimitri Khalezov the Russian Independent Researcher Speaks about his knowledge with False Flag Research and nuclear demolition with Steve Johnson in This First Part of the 9-11 Research Series Entitled 911Nuclear Demolition. BEFORE the World Trade Centers had begun their construction, the building contractors were required because of their sheer scale and size to submit the demolition plans ALONG with the construction plans. Because the plans contained details about using nuclear demolitions, they were given also to the THEN superpower of the USSR because of the peacetime nuclear treaty for using ANY nuclear blasts during peacetime the USSR were to be notified of any such plans to let off devices so Soviet Nuclear intelligence can be informed, as to avoid any nuclear misunderstandings during the Cold war period... Since the Cold War is over, Dimitri is living in retirement and has come forward with these plans, paperwork and all... Since coming forward Dimitris videos were hijacked by a copyright claim by Mi5 Agent Owen Le Winton, who also forced a re-edit on this particular video, Also Henry Makow has falsely claimed this information is just Dimitris "Research" slandering him as a liar. Publishing instead work by an Ed Ward: And Now pushing 911 NUT Judy Woods research about Direceted Energy Weapons: However Spurious claims of dustification of metal have been laughed out of the academic realms because this picture shows a falling steel beam leaving a dust trail: Some 911Nutjobs think this is steel turning to dust and is now being pushed by Rense and Makow as the TRUTH. See 911 NUTS Featuring Nico Haupt, Paula Gloria, Webfairy and Judy Woods all making complete asses of themselves. --------------------------------------------- In The Next VIDEO to be released DImitri speaks about his research into the Sari Club - Nuclear Demolition False Flag attack in 2002 and about his brilliant insight into the enigmatic HAMBALI. 911 Nuclear Demolition - Steve Johnson interviews Dimitri Khalezov. Former Russian Military Nuclear Arms Specialist for the Former Soviet USSR Air Force. His Incredible 26 Part Youtube Video Series is Called 911thology and can be found at the following Page: He now lives in isolation doing his research about Sept 11th crimes. Dimitri and Steve swap each others research and discuss other similar areas of research. In this call Steve wakes him up early Sunday morning firing him questions about his research and shares with him. New York Photographers: None saw a plane Dozens of witnesses of second plane.. All saw something different 911Demolition theory is a 911taboo subject just as is No Plane theories Charlie Rose 9-11 Documentary (Discovered By Genghis6199) 911 Emergency Dumped

Vehicles Hir-es Pictures: Contaminated Emergency Vehicles Some barely scratched yet considered Toxic Radiological Survey Done in New York in 2005 THE TRUTH ABOUT BALI SERIES Ice Age Glaciers? Or Molten Bedrock "Nuke Shell"? The 40 Foot Pothole of Molten Rock 911thology's Channel - YouTube INSIDE EXPLOSIONS INSTEAD OF PLANES DIMITRI KHALESOV - YouTube CIA George Tenet 9/11 Nuclear bombs - YouTube Nuclear destruction of the WTC - YouTube ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 1/10?? - YouTube (Jim Fetzer - very good) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 2/10?? - YouTube (WTC 7 complex prep, Energy Weapon) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 3/10?? - YouTube (nuke detonation 101 and WTC 7 intro) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 4/10?? - YouTube (WTC 7, absorbers, hotspots) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 5/10?? - YouTube (WTC 7 false wall) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 6/10?? - YouTube (cavity, zones, pressure wave) pressure wave travels 400km/sec ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 7/10?? - YouTube (WTC dust, tank steel, no planes) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 8/10?? - YouTube (bathtub, OBL lie, GZ) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 9/10?? - YouTube (bathtub, Viktor Bout, OBL) ?The Fetzer - Khalezov Interview 10/10?? - YouTube (Mike Harari) DIMITRI KHALEZOV 1 ISRAELI INTEL NUKES THE TWIN TOWERS [10-Feb-11] - YouTube Reload from | Breaking news special: Did Mossad agent Mike Harari brag of organizing 9/11? _on a Special Edition of The Kevin Barrett Show. This show was broadcast February 10, 2011. Please study the FRENCH CONNECTION to 9/11 with this video: DIMITRI KHALEZOV 2 ISRAELI INTEL NUKES THE TWIN TOWERS [10-Feb-11] - YouTube Good explanations: Mike Harari, French connection, Free Masons DIMITRI KHALEZOV 3 ISRAELI INTEL NUKES THE TWIN TOWERS [10-Feb-11] - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV 4 ISRAELI INTEL NUKES THE TWIN TOWERS [10-Feb-11] - YouTube Rayelan Allen and Dimitri Khalezov interviewed on the Vinny Eastwood Show DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (1/6) - YouTube vinny eastwood DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (2/6) - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (3/6) - YouTube

DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (4/6) - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (5/6) - YouTube DIMITRI KHALEZOV - 9/11 ATTACKS EXTERNAL TO U.S INTEL SERVICE (6/6) - YouTube South Tower of World Trade Center Collapse - YouTube North tower of world trade center collapse - YouTube 2nd Plane WTC - YouTube The Ultimate Con - 911 - YouTube 9/11 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 1/26 | 9/11 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov on Dr Deagle Show 100628 1/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube Dimitri Khalezov 911 video - the most prohibited item on the web - YouTube 911 WTC nuclear demolition Dimitri Khalezov 01 of 26 : Dimitri Khalezov : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

Evidence - Bathtub, Vehicles, etc

back to top

Khalezov is disinfo meant to discredit nuclear demolition - 9/11 Scholars Forum Peaceful nuclear explosions treaty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty (1976) | Nuclear Arms Control Treaties | Gasbuggy Dec 10, 1967 Investigation of neutronic performance of a peaceful nuclear explosive reactor (PACER) evaluating UF4 and ThF4 nuclides pe1182.pdf (application/pdf Object) The Constructive Uses of Nuclear Explosives (9780070634824): edward teller: Books The Constructive uses of nuclear explosives by Edward Teller (Used, New, Out-of-Print) - Alibris Elements of controversy: the Atomic ... - Google Books - Key points about the WTC towers (excellent) 9/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, Pt. 1 - EXCELLENT - YouTube dust 9/11 Debris: Investigation of Ground Zero, Pt. 2 (v. 2) - EXCELLENT - YouTube Sloped armour - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Vehicle armour - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main Battle Tank - M1, M1A1, and M1A2 Abrams Tank Protection Levels 2024-T6 aircraft aluminium plate products, buy 2024-T6 aircraft aluminium plate products from Workers Rush To Repair Huge Hole In WTC 'Bathtub' - wtc7lies Ground Zero's fires still burning - 03 December 2001 - New Scientist (Ultra violet absorbers) Ultra violet absorbers Ground Zero's WTC Fires Still Burning PYROCOOL WAS USED TO "COVER" THERMITE EVIDENCE... *PIC*

article-0-02C2ECC500000578-922_468x703_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 434x650 pixels) article_0_02C2ECC500000578_922.jpg (JPEG Image, 468x703 pixels) article-1060043-02C3FC4B00000578-535_468x314_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x472 pixels) article-1060043-02C3FC4B00000578-535_468x314_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x472 pixels) stromatolites.jpg (JPEG Image, 1000x701 pixels) THE THIRD TRUTH -=- The Book They Will Kill To Keep Out Of Your Hands - Club Conspiracy Forums THE THIRD TRUTH -=- The Book They Will Kill To Keep Out Of Your Hands - Page 2 - Club Conspiracy Forums Molten metal in basements 911 Demolition - YouTube Molten metal WTC - YouTube 9/11: Molten Metal at Ground Zero - YouTube Un-Debunkable 911 inside job proof - YouTube Molten Metal Flows at Ground Zero - YouTube

Evidence - Iceage

back to top

Bedrock at WTC Tower 4 - YouTube iCe Age pothole found at Wtc ground Zero - YouTube ?911: Craters M-Nukes left in the WTC site?? - YouTube Joe Woolhead 9/11 photography (excellent) Ice Age Landscapes in Lower Manhattan - The New York Times > N.Y. / Region > Slide Show > Slide 1 of 12 At Ground Zero, Scenes From the Ice Age - Ice Age geology revealed at Ground Zero - Technology & science - Science - No Abominoids Here: The Ground Zero Flap has Historical Roots At Ground Zero, Scenes From the Ice Age Ice Age relicts at Ground Zero | NJPB Forums iCe Age pothole found at Wtc ground Zero - YouTube Ground Zero Reveals Ice Age Evidence Traces of the Ice Age at Ground Zero: Gothamist At Ground Zero, Scenes From the Ice Age | News | Silverstein Properties Ice Age geology revealed at Ground Zero - Care2 News Network Pictured: The 40ft 'pothole' that shows Ground Zero was once the site of an Ice Age glacier | Mail Online The vehicles of 9/11..... where'd they go? - - The #1 Online Forum for EMS-Related Discussion groundzerocleanup,freshkillssortingopera - wtc7lies khalezov-911-28-t4-glacier-end-of-august-2008-credit-joe-woolhead.jpg (JPEG Image, 450x338 pixels) Joe Woolhead glacier 22rocks2_650.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x433 pixels) - Joe Woolhead glacier New Scientist - Google Books Observations of Nuclear Explosive Melt Glass Textures and Surface Areas - 329450.pdf (application/pdf Object) The Nuclear Option | Oil Spill Recovery | Clean Up Oil | Oil Spill Resources production_dissolution_nuclearexplo.pdf (application/pdf Object) ScienceDirect - Engineering Geology : Ice ages and nuclear waste isolation ScienceDirect - Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids : Glass produced by underground nuclear explosions*1

Modelling of faulted rock mass response to glaciation, thermal loading and seismicity -- Stephansson and Shen 24 (4): 355 -- Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology Importance of geosphere in hard rock nuclear waste repositories... Iceage - Newly Mapped Walloomsac Formation in Lower Manhattan and New York Harbor and the Implications for Engineers - CJM 2010.pdf (application/pdf Object) Iceage - Bedrock Control of a Boulder-Filled Valley Under the World Trade Center Site - CJMCM2008_WTCValley.pdf (application/pdf Object) Iceage - 50 Ka Till-Filled Pleistocene Plunge Pools and Potholes Found Beneath the World Trade Center Site, New York, NY - moss-09.pdf (application/pdf Object) article-0-02C2ECC500000578-922_468x703.jpg (JPEG Image, 468x703 pixels) article-1060043-02C3FC4B00000578-535_468x314_popup.jpg (JPEG Image, 650x472 pixels)

Evidence - Nuclear Articles

back to top

back to top

Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11 View of a military expert: why did the towers of World Trade Center collapse Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre - GZero_Report.pdf (application/pdf Object) William Tahil, BA Dimitri Khalezov talks about this report in his documentary. This author does a good job of proving the same points that Dimitri testifies to, however he errors in saying it was an underground nuclear reactor that "exploded". World Trade Center Radiation Poisoning Analysis of Aerosols from the World Trade Center Collapse Site, New York, October 2 to October 30, 2001 02786820490250836 (application/pdf Object) NUKE USED IN WTC COLLAPSE 35 Reasons Micro-Nukes Were Utilized to Demolish the WTC Cores on 9/11 : Nuclear Demolition - BEST - WikiSpooks Document:Dimitri Khalezov Interview - WikiSpooks File:Traces of Tritium at WTC.pdf - WikiSpooks File:Melt Glasses at Underground Test.pdf - WikiSpooks File:Containment of Soviet underground nuclear explosions.pdf - WikiSpooks Nuclear Files: Library: Treaties: Treaty on Undergorund Explosions for Peaceful Purposes, Decmeber 11, 1990 Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Peaceful nuclear explosions - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Nuclear weapons testing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Richter magnitude scale - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Richter Earthquake Scale Earthquakes Magnitude Scale and Classes How Are Earthquake Magnitudes Measured? Richter_Mercalli.jpg (JPEG Image, 760 × 574 pixels)

6281319036_a1a95b9c09.jpg (JPEG Image, 411 × 500 pixels) 118elxx.jpg (JPEG Image, 551 × 626 pixels) 1. Brief history. Atomic demolition. 2. Modern history. Nuclear demolition of skyscrapers. 3. How does a modern nuclear demolition work? 4. Videos showing dynamics of collapses of the WTC Twin Towers and the WTC building # 7. The US Government's Use of Atomic Bombs at the WTC on 9/11 Dimitri Khalezov and the MiniNukes of... - ! * POLITICS * ! - China Syndrome at the WTC: The “China Syndrome” Came to New York City on 9/11 Because only nuclear chain reactions release massive heat almost indefinitely, without needing ANY oxygen whatsoever! This is not the case for any conventional (non-nuclear) fire. This “indefinite” massive heat source was the basis for the term “China Syndrome” in regards to a nuclear reactor mishap which, in theory (but not really due to other factors), could have massive indefinite heat leading to a nuclear reactor criticality (core) remnant burning all the way through to China. "SARCOPHAGUS"- The flesh-eating stone coffin Chernobyl Tomb 9/11 WTC. 2 Manhattan projects: ground zero and Ground Zero What is ground zero? History and definitions prior to 9/11. The twin towers and Bldg 7 were taken down by Nuclear Demolition Charges - Dimitri Khalezov - Project Nsearch 9/11 Truth: Was Mossad in Charge? Kevin Barrett, Dimitri Khalezov and Gordon Duff Discuss - 12160 9/11 Nuclear Demolition Of The WTC By Dimitri Khalezov **** MUST SEE **** - Page 24 WTC 1/2 Collapse: I was a truther. Not any longer., page 14 Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC Vaporizing the World Trade Center Is Much of the World Trade Center Missing? Some conspiracy theorists claim that large amounts of the buildings were unaccounted for by the size of the rubble pile. Since only 12% of the building volume was solid, the towers should collapse into a pile 12% of the original height of the building, or just about 50 meters high. Since 18 meters of that pile would be filling the basement, the above-ground portion would be 32 meters high. The actual rubble pile reached the fifth story of adjacent buildings, so well outside the footprint of the tower the pile was five stories, or about 15 meters high. The pile would have been roughly conical, and would have included a lot of void space, increasing its height and offsetting the larger diameter of the pile. Overall the rubble pile is what you'd expect. So it simply isn't true that the rubble pile is only a small percentage of what would be expected. Some conspiracy sites allege that the rubble pile is only 5% of what would be expected. Others use a figure of 33% as the height of a rubble pile relative to the original building and then argue that the pile should have been 140 or so meters high. But when Controlled Demolition Inc. ( dropped a 23-story, 439-foot (134 m) building in Detroit in 1997, they ended up with a pile averaging 35 feet high (11 m) and a maximum of 60 feet (18 m) high. The rubble pile was an average of 8% of the height of the original building and a maximum of 14%. Scaling that up to the World Trade Center, we get heights of 33 to 58 meters. In other words, the rubble pile at the World Trade Center is totally in line with other large building collapses. 33% may work for a small building a few stories high, but a large building will compress the debris pile a lot more and also fill void spaces more effectively with pulverized debris. Cold Fusion Research: Models And Potential Benefits

Treasonous BBC and new 9/11 Hit Job | Prasutagus's Blog As Dimitri said, 9/11 was … « Opportunities Have Consequences - Home Andrew Johnson Mini-Nukes 237 World Trade Center Radiation Poisoning First Responder - "We Were Nuked on 9-11" -- Puppet Masters --


back to top

sv3rige's Channel - YouTube Video: visible ground shaking at the moment of the WTC demolition. Video: collapse of the WTC-2 (the South Tower) following its nuclear demolition. Video: collapse of the WTC-1 (the North Tower) following its nuclear demolition. Video: WTC-7 demolition. Extreme Prejudice - CIA Whistle Blower Susan Lindauer PDX 911Truth - (24min mark) - YouTube A rcoones video: Amazing testimony of ex CIA Asset Susan Lindauer. 5 years of legal troubles, 1 year in prison for daring to tell the truth. During the Bush era the top controllers of the governmental mechanics of Defense and national Security wanted to have a war with Iraq. They got their wish and anyone who got in the way were dealt with severely no matter if they violated a law or not. Not brought to trial she was jailed under the "Patriot Act" which amounted to summary punishment outside a Verdict in a court of law. She was punished in jail without a Trial at all This is part of her story that is just unfolding now. She has waited 10 years to tell this story. "Need information and data relative to the creation and designed use of Smart Meters. Is this as I suspect to be used to identify areas in the USA and Britain to locate population groups that are of lower intelligence and subject to extermination. In short the kill off of the useless eaters and non productive groups. Blacks, Browns, Asians, lower class Whites etc . We suspect they will target these people for termination by ratcheting up the voltage to a point which would render them mumified, docile or dead. I believe the purpose of making smart meters mandatory is to enable the CIA, NSA and the dept of Naval Intelligence to soon determine which portions of the population are to be terminated in accordance with the Illuminazi plan to reduce the population by 95%. Obviously Kissinger, The Rothchilds, The Rockefellers, and others of this Evilarchy are party to this plan to reduce the population of the planet by 95%. Bill Gates, Ted The Terrible Turner, and other Malthusians are actively engaged in bringing about this mass murder that is obviously underway. We need those of you who understand how this grid system works and how the genicidal program is to be launched. Obviously this program out Hitlers Hitler. Nothing like it in the history of Mankind comes close to the carnage that could well be before us were we not to act. I need your help to put the pieces of this GeoGenicidal jigsaw puzzle together. Only those of you who have knowledge and information at the highest level need make contact. We need information with specifics explaining how this control grid is in place and how it can be dismantled." Thank You...Anthony J Hilder contact: Be a Whistle Blower Researcher or Serious Political Activist. Are you and executive and engineer in a positions of mid to hi gh level post won orking for a major electical provider in the USA, UK, or Sweden and have knowledge as to how much damage one of these Death Meters can do. We are hunting for whistle blowers. I will keep you identity visual and verbal from public views. Will do interviews behind screens and with voice alternators to cover the privacy issue. Weve already had two who have given us large amounts of pertinent information relative to the crimes now in the process of being committed.

CIA Whistle-blower Susan Lindauer Exposes Everything 9/11 : conspiracy 911 Eyewitness Pyroclastic Flow - Proof of Controlled Demolition – WTC1,2 + 7 (long) This centuries Zapruder film of 9/11 and seven laws of science prove treason, fraud and murder This clip shows a huge amount of hot energy and gasses were released on the demolition of the 3 towers in NYC on Sept 11, 2001. The Pyroclastic flow of dust and debris is a telltale sign of a controlled demolition. WT7 also shows the same explosive energy in its destruction. Pools of molten metal were found in the basement of the 3 buildings. Thermite could explain this. “Pull it” is completely explained along with Larry Silversteins’ admission to it. 911 Eyewitness - Pyroclastic Flow was a telltale sign of controlled demolition (short) Pyroclastic flow is defined on the US Geological Survey website as a ground hugging avalanche of hot gas and debris. The couliflower shaped debris clouds observed during the collapse of the WTC buildings on 09/11/01 were telltale signs of a pyroclastic flow. These phenomenon are typically visible only during volcanic eruptions and controlled demolition of buildings 911 Eyewitness - A closer look at the debris left by the collapses at WTC 911 Eyewitness - Hoboken "Highlights" 60 min. 911 Eyewitness Hoboken Highlights 1 Hour TV Special An Atomic Bomb will stop the Gulf Oil Leak, LOOK! - YouTube Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #35 - YouTube Nuclear Underground Detonation (Sedan Event - Ploughshare) - YouTube More Than Junk Science - 60 Minutes - CBS News see: Cold Fusion - More Than Junk Science (60 Minutes, CBS News)(360p_H.264-AAC) Dr. Deagle 911 WTC mini nukes test results (short version) - YouTube 9/11 Underground Explosion - YouTube Nuclear destruction of the WTC - YouTube Dr. Deagle 911 WTC mini nukes test results (extended version) 911 Eyewitness - Evidence of thermonuclear explosions - YouTube 9/11 WTC ?????? (Ground Zero ) ?? ???? (H-bomb nuke test ) - YouTube ????????? (Ground Zero Truth) - YouTube Dr Deagle Show 100628 1/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube Dr Deagle Show 100628 2/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube Dr Deagle Show 100628 3/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube Dr Deagle Show 100628 4/4 - Dimitri A. Khalezov - YouTube 9/11 Nuclear Demolition of The WTC - by Dimitri Khalezov 9/11 Expanding Rising Mushroom Cloud - YouTube Look above the tower after it begins exploding, at around :10. Notice the huge, rising, expanding new cloud. Observe the plume expanding to the right, which is west, which is against the wind. Marvel at the cauliflower shapes, much more distinct than the surrounding smoke that has diffused into the air. There is one and only one explanation for this phenomenon. A very large heat energy input. Standard demolitions do not create a mushroom cloud. This one did. Besides proving demolition, this video rules out Judy Wood's ridiculous claim of

"no significant heat". For anyone who hasn't been paying attention, Judy Wood is a fraud. John Hutchison is a fraud. There is no such thing as any Hutchison Effect. The twin towers were blown up with explosives, most likely nuclear. Blog entry is here:

9/11 TV FAKERY THE LYING FIREFIGHTERS PT 1 - YouTube The title foer this video series is supposed to be sarcastic, but that seems to have backfired on the uploader with ratings currently at 59 likes vs. 72 dislikes. Regardless, the testimony of the firefighters actually describes EXACTLY what Dimitri claims happened ... the firefighters describe the towers shaking and they also felt the ground shake as thought a train was going past them. This information describes the Seismic Readings for a strong earthquake (well over 5.5 on the Richter Scale - telling us than not less than 100 kiloton underground nuclear explosion must have been responsible). 9/11 TV FAKERY THE LYING FIREFIGHTERS PT 2 - YouTube 9/11 TV FAKERY THE LYING FIREFIGHTERS PT 3 - YouTube This video provides additional testimony that the firefighters felt the buildings shake like a train was running by them. This supports Dimitri's detailed explanation in Part 2 of the Seismic readings being tampered with. 9/11 TV FAKERY THE LYING FIREFIGHTERS PT 4 - YouTube 9/11 Truth: Steel Buildings Don't Collapse From Fire - YouTube

Jeff Prager

back to top

Jeff Prager: Nuclear 911 (2011) - Detailed Exposure of the Thermonuclear Demolition Jeff Prager - 911 Dust (2011) Free File Hosting Made Simple - MediaFire Report Docket No. NIOSH 227 JP.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage Report Docket No. NIOSH 227 JP.pdf - File Shared from Box - Free Online File Storage Final Dust 1 to 109.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage Final Dust 110 to 199.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage Final Dust 200 to 310.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage Ionizing Radiation 911.1-243.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage Ionizing Radiation 911.244-301.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage Ionizing Radiation 911.302-354.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage Kill Zone.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage 1 Murdering Liberty Killing Hope.pdf - File Shared from - Free Online File Storage 1 Murdering Liberty Killing Hope - When psychopaths rule the world After 911 Book II Complete.pdf (application/pdf Object)

Operation Plowshare

back to top

OPERATION PLOWSHARE 1962 (WITH SLOW-MOTIONS) - YouTube An overview of Operation Plowshare, which occured in 1962. Operation Plowshare's main objective was to test and excavate the earth with nuclear explosives. The results? Over 12 million tonnes of earth were displaced by the blast, creating a crater 97.5 meters (320 feet) deep and 390.1 meters (1,280 feet) wide. PLUS: incredible

SLOW-MOTIONS of the HUGE explosions! AWESOME!!! Plowshare, Part 1/2 (1961) - YouTube Plowshare, Part 2/2 (1961) - YouTube Video - Audio & Image Hosting | An Atomic Bomb will stop the Gulf Oil Leak LK Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Films - YouTube Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #34 - YouTube

Evidence - Pentagon Missile

back to top

Russian submarine K-141 Kursk - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Russian submarine Kursk explosion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Expecting the Raptures: Dimitri Khalezov - Russian missile hit Pentagon, one of the 24 missing from Kursk. Next one Rome? Disclosure Imminent? Two Underground NWO Bases Destroyed FOUR NUKES STOLEN FROM THE RUSSIAN SUB ‘KURSK’ (Paul Laine) I have independent confirmation from a Mr. Paul Lane, of Pentagon military intelligence – he was a part of the Men Who Stare At Goats group – that four nuclear weapons were stolen from the Russian submarine Kursk after it sank. I think it was in 2000 or something. It was one of those nuclear weapons that was smuggled in [to Japan]. DW: Stolen by who, though? BF: This is the Odessa group. The Nazi group. The one that was trying to set up a fascist world government – a Fourth Reich. DW: Okay. How did they get to the Kursk to get these nukes out? BF: I don’t know the technical details, but they have submarine bases in various parts of the world. I assume it was from one of these submarine bases. WHY STEAL NUKES IF YOU CAN BUILD YOUR OWN? DW: The next question, then, would be why would they need to get it from the Kursk if they are powerful enough to make their own? BF: The public nuclear devices are under strict safety protocols. You can’t just take them and then blow them up somewhere. There are too many people involved in the chain of command. They tried to do that. nestingwave The weapons used in the attack were created with fuel taken from a nuclear warhead stolen from the Russian submarine Kursk. Paul Laine from Pentagon Military intelligence confirmed that four nuclear warheads were stolen from the Kursk when it “sank” in August of 2000. An MI6 agent using the name Richard Sorge also informed the Japanese police in 2010 that a nuclear warhead had been smuggled into Japan via Okinawa and was located in a property in Hinode Town, in Western Tokyo owned by former Prime Minister and senior North Korean Agent Yasuhiro Nakasone. The agent later informed the police the weapon had been smuggled into the headquarters of the General Association of North Korean Residents of Japan. Attack on the U.S.S. Liberty & Israel’s Original Plans for World War III | The Blog of the WTC Demolition Site K-141 Kursk Accident Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near Pentagon After 9/11 THE KURSK TO BE RAISED BY MAMMOET / Kursk submarine (2000-2003) / WPS Russian Media Monitoring Agency After long negotiations and arguments on who will raise the submarine Kursk from the bottom of the Barents Sea, the Russian government signed a contract with the Dutch company Mammoet. Other applicants, the Dutch company Smit Tak and the Norwegian company Halliburton Subsea, will be subcontractors. The submarine will be raised on September 15. The value of the contract has not been made public yet. However, Reuters has reported already that overall, approximately $70 million will be spent on salvaging the Kursk. Mammoet has raised and transported many and varied heavy vessels. For instance, the Dutch submarines Zwaardvis and Tjigerhaai were transported 80 meters by

ground to their floating dock and then delivered from Rotterdam to the Far East. The submarines weighed 1,600 tons each, and they were raised 80 meters in half an hour. Besides, in 2000, Mammoet managed to raise a port lifting crane weighing 1,550 tons that fell in the Danish port of Odensee in a storm. Practically nothing is known about other foreign firms that applied for participation in this project but failed to be included in it. Why have Moscow and St. Petersburg decided to choose the consortium including the American company Halliburton acting through its Norwegian subsidiary? By the way, the hypothesis of a collision between the Kursk and an American submarine has not been refuted yet, and participation of an American company in this project suggests the thought of some special interest. During the presidential campaign Halliburton became a subject of publications in the American press, since US Vice President Richard Cheney used to work for this firm. Opponents accused Cheney of using his political links for finding profitable contracts for his company. For instance, "The Times" has written that Cheney managed to thrash out a $292-million credit for the Tumen Oil Company so that it would be able to buy equipment from the aforementioned company. "KURSK" Lifting Operation: Mammoet Transport BV company: reference material - "KURSK" Lifting Operation: The Secret of the Kursk’s Weapons - Raising the Kursk Page 3: Raised Kursk May Leave Questions Unanswered - ABC News P-700 Granit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia BBC NEWS | In Depth | Russian sub BBC NEWS | Europe | Media struggles for Kursk truth BBC NEWS | Europe | Kursk relatives still waiting for answers BBC NEWS | Europe | First pictures inside charred Kursk BBC NEWS | In Depth | 'Torpedo explosion' sank Kursk BBC NEWS | Europe | What caused the accident? BBC NEWS | In Depth | First Kursk missiles removed Russian salvage workers have removed the first three of 22 Granit cruise missiles from the Kursk nuclear submarine. BBC NEWS | Europe | Kursk raised from sea bed Radiation 'normal'"The emotion was very great when we heard this news, because it means this enormous labour by divers, sailors and technical experts, has not been in vain," the head of Russia's Northern Fleet, Vice-Admiral Mikhail Motsak said. BBC NEWS | Europe | US experts: Double blast 'sank Kursk' BBC NEWS | Europe | Disaster exposes military decline BBC NEWS | In Depth | First Kursk missiles removed

Evidence - Radiation Articles

back to top

back to top

Investigation of radiation-caused cancer among Ground Zero workers « nuclear-news Radiation had contaminated the World Trade Center Towers « The Canadian National Newspaper Exopolitics Headlines Radiation had contaminated the World Trade Center Towers « The Canadian Headlines Newspaper Medical response to terrorism: preparedness and clinical practice - Daniel C. Keyes - Google Books » “MYSTERY DISEASE” AFFECTS NEW YORKERS IN WAKE OF 911 ATTACKS - Recovering Liberal What was not published in the Post, or anywhere else for that matter, is the recent opinions of some in the

medical community that some of those afflicted by the “mystery disease” may actually be suffering the affects of uranium poisoning and not the result of breathing asbestos, computer part fragments, and concrete powder, as they were led to believe. Should these theories be correct and acknowledged, the City of New York and the Federal Government are looking at medical costs in the billions as uranium radiation poisoning is known to cause over time, cancer, chronic fatigue syndrome, joint and muscle pain, neurological and/or nerve damage, mood disturbances, auto-immune deficiencies, lung and kidney damage, vision problems, skin rupture, increase in miscarriages, maternal mortality and genetic birth defects/deformation. .... One theory worth investigating comes to us from writer, Greg Szymanski. In an article published on August 19th of last year, two high profile radiation experts, Leuren Moret, who has spent a life time working in the nuclear field, first as a staff scientist at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Laboratory in California, and now as a member of The Radiation and Public Health Project, and retired Army Maj. Doug Rokke, a PhD in educational physics and former top military expert, concur that the Pentagon strike involved the use of a missile, rather than a plane as in the official government scenario. Szymanski‘ s article also claims that Geiger counter readings right after the attack showed high levels of radiation 12 miles away from the Pentagon crash site. Thousands In NY Dying Of '911 Disease' - Uranium Probable 9-11 Responders Struggle for Health, Help | Womens eNews Evidence grows that 9/11 first-responders got cancer after working at Ground Zero - NY Daily News A leading authority on the illnesses suffered by Ground Zero responders, Dr. Philip Landrigan says that an analysis of 20,000 medical case histories revealed an incidence of cancer that is 14% higher tha expected for a population of the same profile. The most common elevations were in prostate, thyroid and blood cancers. Landrigan’s findings add to the evidence that the toll from service on or around The Pile, bad as that toll has been, will significantly worsen with time. Research by fire department doctors previously had found a 19% higher cancer rate among FDNY members who’d been at Ground Zero than among those who hadn’t. 360 post-9/11 workers have died, including 80 of cancer, says state - NY Daily News More than 360 workers who dealt with the aftermath of the World Trade Center disaster have died, state health officials said Wednesday. Officials have determined the cause of death of 154 of the responders and volunteers who toiled at Ground Zero, the blocks nearby and at the Fresh Kills landfill, where debris from the site was taken. Of those, 80 died of cancer. "It's the tip of the iceberg," said David Worby, who is representing 10,000 workers - 600 with cancer - who say they got sick after working on rescue and recovery efforts. "These statistics bear out how toxic that site was," Worby said. Most of the deadly tumors were in the lungs and digestive system, according to the tally from the state's World Trade Center Responder Fatality Investigation Program. Other deaths were traced to blood cancers and heart and circulatory diseases. Five ex-workers committed suicide, said Kitty Gelberg, who is tracking the deaths for the program. Gelberg said she had not yet determined whether the number of cancer deaths was more or less than those typically occurring in men in their 20s to 50s who work as cops, firefighters or laborers - the majority of 9/11 workers. Read more: Hundreds of 9/11 cops diagnosed with cancer — RT Hundreds of 9/11 first responders die of cancer — RT 9/11 causes cancer — RT 9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale” : Veterans Today RADIATION CANCERS KILL 345 SO FAR 9/11 FIREFIGHTERS ARE GETTING CANCER AT A FASTER RATE THAN OTHERS, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER REVEALS

Early assessment of cancer outcomes in New York City firefighters after the 9/11 attacks: an observational cohort study : The Lancet Study Points to WTC Cancer Link Health effects arising from the September 11 attacks - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia City of Dust World Trade Center (WTC) Health Studies and Information on Health Services This link is included to show DECEPTION. The word "cancer" does not appear once on this bullshit report, yet hundreds of resuce workers have been diagnosed with cancer, or have died from it. World Trade Center (WTC) Responder Fatality Investigation Program village voice > news > Death by Dust by Kristen Lombardi picture: To date, 75 recovery workers at ground zero have been diagnosed with blood cell cancers that a halfdozen top doctors and epidemiologists have confirmed as having been likely caused by that exposure. Ernie Vallabuona is one of them. photo: Scott McDermott Ozonoff echoes all five of his colleagues when he draws parallels between the aftermath of 9-11 and that of another massive exposure: the atomic-bombs dropped on Japan. Bomb survivors experienced excessive spikes in leukemia rates within the first five years, a surprising discovery for epidemiologists in the mid 20th century. While this outbreak resulted from radiation, both it and 911 involved a sudden and intense blast of carcinogens. For bomb survivors, leukemia appeared first, followed by breast and lung cancer. "That could happen with 9-11," says Samet, the Johns Hopkins epidemiology department chair. "It might be what we're seeing today." Death by Dust - Page 1 - News - New York - Village Voice Police union demands information on 9/11 toxic debris | NEW YORK (WABC) -- New York City's police union is demanding more information about the effects of toxic debris from the 9/11 attacks. The Patrolmen's Benevolent Association called on the city to release all data about officers who suffered cancer after responding at the World Trade Center at a news conference on Sunday. The union also showed the uniform worn that day by Officer Alonzo Harris. It was tested and found to have dangerous carcinogens on it. The P.B.A. says the city has dragged its feet on providing information about first responders. "It's unconscionable that they would not release this data. This is an issue of men and women who serve this city without question and they're looking for one thing, they're looking for the treatment that they deserve," P.B.A. President Patrick Lynch said. The union wants cancer included on the list of illnesses covered by the Zadroga Act, to help first responders. Study: 9/11 Responders Getting Cancer - Video - WSB Atlanta - CNN 9/11 first responders and cancer - CBS News Video Study shows rise of cancer in 9/11 firefighters - CBS News Study: 9/11 responders suffer increased cancer rate (msnbc) msnbc video: 9/11 first responders at risk for cancer Study: 9/11 firefighters have 19 percent higher cancer risk - Health - Cancer - Top Doctors Say Trade Center Dust Could Cause Cancer - October 4, 2006 - The New York Sun The Canadian National Newspaper: Japanese activists claim that 9/11 related cancers similar illnesses in Hiroshima after dropping of nuclear bomb in World War II Lawyers for sick Ground Zero clean-up workers set to pocket more than $400million from lawsuits | Mail Online » Hundreds of 9/11 first responders die of cancer Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Plea for help for 9/11 cancer victims | World news | 9/11 firefighters ARE getting cancer at a faster rate than others, chief medical officer reveals | Mail Online 9/11 First Responders Cancer | Health friends Cough and Bronchial Responsiveness in Firefighters at the World Trade Center Site — NEJM Results In the first six months after September 11, 2001, World Trade Center cough occurred in 128 of 1636 firefighters with a high level of exposure (8 percent), 187 of 6958 with a moderate level of exposure (3 percent), and 17 of 1320 with a low level of exposure (1 percent). In addition, 95 percent had symptoms of dyspnea, 87 percent had gastroesophageal reflux disease, and 54 percent had nasal congestion. Of those tested before treatment of World Trade Center cough, 63 percent of firefighters (149 of 237) had a response to a bronchodilator and 24 percent (9 of 37) had bronchial hyperreactivity. Chest radiographs were unchanged from precollapse findings in 319 of the 332 with World Trade Center cough. Among the cohort without severe cough, bronchial hyperreactivity was present in 77 firefighters with a high level of exposure (23 percent) and 26 with a moderate level of exposure (8 percent).

Study: Cancer Risk Higher for WTC Firefighters | Lawmakers Push to Add Cancers to Zadroga Act | FDNY Study Confirms Rise in Cancer After 9/11 | More Than 10,000 9/11 Responders Settle Suits | NYC 9/11 Toxic Brew Sickens Thousands |


back to top

New 9/11 Eyewitness Evidence of Bombs at WTC - excellent - YouTube Excellent interview. Listen to the person being interviewed. He explains that he was wearing the very best protection mask yet still became very sick. (6min mark)

CNN - 70% of WTC first responders are ill - YouTube Only 9 years and 900 dead first responders later are they just now getting the health care they deserve. Nine years after 9/11, 900 responders are dead - YouTube Nine hundred 9/11 heroes have died since the 2001 terrorist attacks. Thousands of others are suffering from various cancers believed to have been caused by toxins at Ground Zero. The US federal government has failed, thus far, to pass 9/11 health legislation that would assist 9/11 responders with medical care. 9/11 Causing Cancer - YouTube 9/11 First Responders Plagued by Cancer, Asthma, PTSD - ABC News "I've been to 54 funerals of firefighters since 9/11 and 52 of them are cancer-related," says John Feal, a former firefighter and founder of the FealGood Foundation, an advocacy group seeking medical coverage and compensation for first responders of 9/11. Respiratory Illness, PTSD Appear Linked in 9/11 Workers - ABC News 9/11 first responders and cancer - YouTube The results of the long awaited cancer study proving a link between 9/11 first responders and cancer diagnoses is finally revealed. Jeff Glor reports on a New York City firefighter who says working at the World Trade Center after 9/11 is the cause for his lymphoma.

9/11 First Responders Cancer - YouTube Rare cancers. The World Trade Center Health Program claims there is not enough scientific evidence that some 9/11 First Responders are suffering from rare cancer because of their rescue efforts on September 11th (therefore they will not get public funding to treat their illness). Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian discuss. 9/11 First Responder Cancer: Coincidence? - YouTube Sick 9/11 responders forgotten - YouTube 9/11 first responders are outraged as Congress did not pass a bill that would have given the responders health coverage for their illnesses. Kenny Specht, a former NYFD lieutenant, asks how often human life takes a backseat to partisanship in Washington, DC? He went on to say he is tired of selling death to Congress and he is done with Washington politicians.

Viktor Bout

back to top

Viktor Bout Stung By DEA Operation ‘Relentless’: Sentenced to 25 Years | Dobroyeutro's Blog Convicted Arms Dealer Bout’s Sentencing Delayed | Russia | RIA Novosti Judge to hear Bout's appeals instead of passing sentence | Russian Legal Information Agency (RAPSI). 911 & Viktor Bout : Interview Victor Bout, Dimitri Khalezov & Military Unit 46179 | Decrypted Matrix Viktor Bout, who inspired the movie Lord of War, has been sentenced to 25 years prison | Herald Sun Victor Bout Must Be Silenced! | Veterans Today Victor Bout Must Be Silenced | 2012: What's the 'real' truth? Arms Trafficking, Stolen Missiles, Soviet Submarines, Nuclear Detonations and 9/11: Exclusive Interview with Dimitri Khalezov in Bangkok | Dobroyeutro's Blog Viktor Bout Asks The Judge Not To Sentence: Attorney Dayan’s Letter To The Judge | Dobroyeutro's Blog The Excavator: Russian Whistleblower Dimitri Khalezov Says U.S. And Russia Are Framing Former Russian Military Officer Viktor Bout Most_shocking_interview_English.pdf (application/pdf Object) Viktor Bout: Russian Patsy Framed by Russia/US Intelligence Working Together: Important First Update | Vatican Assassins Victor A. Bout What Does Viktor Bout Know? - by Douglas Farah | Foreign Policy US-Russia Bidding War For 9/11 “Merchant Of Death” Reaches $20 Billion Anatomy of a Frame | Veterans Today Obama Ordered To Denver Bunker By US Military | Mike Philbin Blog: Wayne Madsen says, "Viktor Bout knows too much about 9-11," ?Viktor Bout: Lord of War blame game?? - YouTube ?Merchant of Death or victim of US propaganda??? - YouTube ?This is who invented Victor Bout, Johan Peleman?? - YouTube Extradited: 'Merchant of Death' Viktor Bout faces life in US jail - YouTube Daniel Estulin: Bout just a pawn, endgame - to get at Russia - YouTube Exclusive video of Victor Bout arrival in New York - YouTube Victor Bout, the six billion dollar man - YouTube Victor Bout, a tale of political persecution - YouTube

research old news articles

back to top - New York Times Magazine 1980's - Category Details The New York Times: Search for 'world trade center device' TEACHING TALL BUILDINGS TO KEEP THEIR BALANCE - The New York Times: Search for 'world trade center discovered' "world trade center" - Local Search Boston Globe Archive Boston Globe Archive - BUILDER WANTS TO GO TWO UP ON CHICAGO Boston Globe Archive - ABC'S CASE OF NUCLEAR SHIVERS Boston Globe Archive - [ Two of the Western world's worst nightmares - terr... ] Boston Globe Archive - BOSTON INVESTOR BUYS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero . George Tamaro, p. 1 | PBS America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero . Peter Rinaldi | PBS