Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Still popular in legal classrooms today, the Socratic Method is named after Greek philosopher Socrates, who taught students by asking question after question, seeking to expose contradictions in the students thoughts and ideas to then guide them to arrive at a solid, tenable conclusion. The principle underlying the Socratic Method is that students learn through the use of critical thinking, reasoning, and logic, finding holes in their own theories and then patching them up. This often rapid-fire exchange takes place in front of the entire class, so students get practice thinking and making arguments on their feet and also speaking in front of large groups. Although some law students find the process intimidating or humiliatinga la John Housemans Oscar-winning performance in The Paper Chasewhen done correctly by a great professor, the Socratic Method can actually produce a lively, engaging, and intellectual classroom atmosphere. Handling the Hot Seat First-year law students should take comfort in the fact that everyone will get his or her turn on the hot seatprofessors often simply choose a student at random instead of waiting for raised hands. And although the first time is difficult for everyone, after a while, you may actually find the process exhilarating as you single-handedly bring your class to the single nugget of information the professor was driving at. Youre unlikely to forget the first time you successfully played the Socratic game; most lawyers can probably still tell you about their shining Socratic Method moment.
the end of a successful Socratic Seminar participants often leave with more questions than they brought with them.
The Question
A Socratic Seminar opens with a question either posed by the leader or solicited from participants as they acquire more Experience in seminars. An opening question has no right answer, instead it reflects a genuine curiosity on the part of the questioner. A good opening question leads participants back to the text as they speculate, evaluate, define, and clarify the issues involved. Responses to the opening question generate new questions from the leader and participants, leading to new responses. In this way, the line of inquiry in a Socratic Seminar evolves on the spot rather than being predetermined by the leader.
The Leader
In a Socratic Seminar, the leader plays a dual role as leader and participant. The seminar leader consciously demonstrates habits of mind that lead to a thoughtful exploration of the ideas in the text by keeping the discussion focused on the text, asking follow-up questions, helping participants clarify their positions when arguments become confused, and involving reluctant participants while restraining their more vocal peers.
debate, one listens to find flaws, to spot differences, and to counter arguments. Dialogue enlarges and possibly changes a participant's point of view. Debate defends assumptions as truth. Dialogue creates an open-minded attitude: an openness to being wrong and an openness to change. Debate creates a close-minded attitude, a determination to be right. In dialogue, one submits one's best thinking, expecting that other people's reflections will help improve it rather than threaten it. In debate, one submits one's best thinking and defends it against challenge to show that it is right. Dialogue calls for temporarily suspending one's beliefs. Debate calls for investing wholeheartedly in one's beliefs. In dialogue, one searches for strengths in all positions. In debate, one searches for weaknesses in the other position. Dialogue respects all the other participants and seeks not to alienate or offend. Debate rebuts contrary positions and may belittle or deprecate other participants. Dialogue assumes that many people have pieces of answers and that cooperation can lead to a greater understanding. Debate assumes a single right answer that somebody already has. Dialogue remains open-ended. Debate demands a conclusion.