Data analysed from our survey

No. Of Participants Gender Male Female No. of Participants 388 412

No. of Participants
No. of Participants

412

388

Male

Female

No. of Participants
Male Female

48% 52%

Our data is based on a survey of 800 people which consists of male and female. The bar graph shows the exact number of participants while the pie chart shows the percentage

No. of times toilet used per day (Male)
No. of times toilet used per day(Male) 0 - 2 times 2 - 4 times 4 - 6 times 6 or more times Tally 57 116 205 10

Male
250 200 150 100 50 0 0 - 2 times 2 - 4 times 4 - 6 times 6 or more times

No. of times toilet used per day

No. of times toilet used per day (Male)
0 - 2 times 2 - 4 times 4 - 6 times 6 or more times

2% 15% 30%

53%

The bar graph shows the number of times the males are using the toilet in a day and the sum up of the overall data that we have collected .The pie chart shows the percentage of the overall data of males using the toilet in a day.

No. of times toilet used per day(Female)
No. of times toilet used per day(Female) 0 - 2 times 2 - 4 times 4 - 6 times 6 or more times Tally 42 60 97 213

Female
250 200 150 100 50 0 0 - 2 times 2 - 4 times 4 - 6 times 6 or more times

No. of times toilet used per day

No. of times toilet used per day (Female)
0 - 2 times 2 - 4 times 4 - 6 times 6 or more times

10% 15% 52% 23%

The bar graph shows the number of times the females are using the toilet in a day and the sum up of the overall data that we have collected .The pie chart shows the percentage of the overall data of females using the toilet in a day.

RATING OF PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT (MALE)
CAFETERIA RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD TALLY 0 4 31 71 90

Rating of Physical Environment (Cafeteria) (MALE)
100 50 0 EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Rating BAD VERY BAD

STUDENT CENTRE RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 1 85 92 6 8

Rating of Physical Environment (Student Centre) (MALE)
100 50 0 EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Rating BAD VERY BAD

From the bar graph, it is obvious that the student centre toilet has a better rating as compared to the cafeteria.
RATING OF PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT (FEMALE)

CAFETERIA RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 0 2 16 31 63

Rating of Physical Environment (Cafeteria) (Female)
100 50 0 EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Rating BAD VERY BAD

STUDENT CENTRE RATINGS TALLY EXCELLENT 3 GOOD 87 AVERAGE 196 BAD 9 VERY BAD 5

Rating of Physical Environment (Student Centre) (Female)
200 100 0 EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Rating BAD VERY BAD

From this data, it is also obvious that Student Centre toilet is better than the Cafeteria. Most female students rate the student centre toilet Average while at cafeteria, most people rate it as Very Bad. Something should be done to fix both gender toilets in the cafeteria. RATING OF PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT (MALE) CAFETERIA RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD TALLY 0 4 31 71 90

Rating of Physical Environment (Cafeteria) (MALE)
EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE 0% 2% 46% 16% BAD VERY BAD

36%

STUDENT CENTRE RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 1 85 92 6 8

Rating of Physical Environment (Student Centre) (MALE)
EXCELLENT 3% GOOD AVERAGE 4% 1% BAD VERY BAD

44% 48%

The physical rating of a toilet is important as it can affect people whether going into the toilet or not and if that can rejuvenate, unwind and refresh. It is obvious that cafeteria wins under the “Very Bad” category. While in the Student Centre toilet, it is rated most as “Average”. RATING OF PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT (FEMALE)
CAFETERIA RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD TALLY 0 2 16 31 63

Rating of Physical Environment (Cafeteria) (Female)
EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE 0% 2% 14% 56% 28% BAD VERY BAD

STUDENT CENTRE RATINGS TALLY EXCELLENT 3 GOOD 87 AVERAGE 196 BAD 9 VERY BAD 5

Rating of Physical Environment (Student Centre) (Female)
EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE 1% 29% 65% BAD VERY BAD 3% 2%

It goes the same for the female toilet too. Cafeteria wins under the “Very Bad” category. And as for the Student Centre Toilet, it wins under the “Average” category and the second biggest proportion that it wins is under the “Good” proportion.

RATING OF FACILITIES (MALE) CAFETERIA RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 0 2 53 39 104

Rating of Facilities (Cafeteria) (Male)
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Rating BAD VERY BAD

STUDENT CENTRE RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 1 3 116 53 17

Rating of Facilities (Student Centre) (Male)

200 100 0 EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Rating BAD VERY BAD

RATING OF FACILITIES (FEMALE)
STUDENT CENTRE RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 3 7 138 49 27

Rating of Facilities (Cafeteria) (Female)
80 60 40 20 0 EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Rating BAD VERY BAD

CAFETERIA RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 0 1 71 73 43

Rating of Facilities (Student Centre) (Female)
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Rating BAD VERY BAD

CAFETERIA RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 0 2 53 39 104

Rating of Facilities (Cafeteria) (Male)
EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE 0% 1% 27% 52% 20% BAD VERY BAD

RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

STUDENT CENTRE TALLY 1 3 116 53 17

Rating of Facilities (Student Centre) (Male)
EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE 0% 2% 9% 28% 61% BAD VERY BAD

CAFETERIA RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 0 1 71 73 43

Rating of Facilities (Cafeteria) (Female)
EXCELLENT GOOD 23% AVERAGE 0% 0% BAD VERY BAD

38%

39%

STUDENT CENTRE RATINGS EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE BAD VERY BAD

TALLY 3 7 138 49 27

Rating of Facilities (Student Centre) (Female)
EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE 1% 3% 12% 22% 62% BAD VERY BAD

PREFERRED TOILET (MALE) VENUE STUDENT CENTRE CAFETERIA NO. OF PARTICIPANTS 255 133

Preferred Toilet (Male)

300 250 200 150 100 50 0 STUDENT CENTRE Venue CAFETERIA

Preferred Toilet (Male)
STUDENT CENTRE CAFETERIA

34%

66%

PREFERRED TOILET (FEMALE) VENUE STUDENT CENTRE CAFETERIA NO. OF PARTICIPANTS 303 109

Preferred Toilet (Female)
350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 STUDENT CENTRE Venue CAFETERIA

Preferred Toilet (Female)
STUDENT CENTRE CAFETERIA

26%

74%

DOES THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE TOILET AFFECT HOW YOU TREAT THE TOILET? (MALE) POLLS NO. OF PARTICIPANTS YES 218 NO 170

Does the Environment of the Toilet affect how you treat the toilet (Male)
250 200 150 100 50 0 YES Polls NO

Does the Environment of the Toilet affect how you treat the toilet (Male)
YES NO

44% 56%

DOES THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE TOILET AFFECT HOW YOU TREAT THE TOILET? (FEMALE) POLLS NO. OF PARTICIPANTS YES 297 NO 115

Does the Environment of the Toilet affect how you treat the toilet (Female)

400 200 0 YES Polls NO

Does the Environment of the Toilet affect how you treat the toilet (Female)
YES NO

28%

72%

WAYS TO IMPROVE THE TOILET FACILITIES (MALE)
TOILET FACILITIES HANDSOAPS / HAND SANITIZERS / AIR FRESHENERS RUBBISH BINS TOILET CLEANLINESS / TOILET HYGIENE TOILET PAPERS TOILET FLUSHERS LIGHTINGS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS NO. OF PARTICIPANTS 37 84 98 16 23 120 10

Ways to improve the toilet facilities (Male)
120 100 80 60 40 20 0

Toilet Facilities

Ways to improve the toilet facilities (Male)
3% 9% 31% 22% TOILET CLEANLINESS / TOILET HYGIENE 6% 4% 25% TOILET PAPERS TOILET FLUSHERS LIGHTINGS & MAINTENANCE HANDSOAPS / HAND SANITIZERS / AIR FRESHENERS RUBBISH BINS

WAYS TO IMPROVE THE TOILET FACILITIES(FEMALE)

TOILET FACILITIES HANDSOAPS / HAND SANITIZERS / AIR FRESHENERS RUBBISH BINS TOILET CLEANLINESS / TOILET HYGIENE TOILET PAPERS TOILET FLUSHERS LIGHTINGS & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS

NO. OF PARTICIPANTS 106 47 53 88 24 92 2

Ways to improve the toilet facilities (Female)
120 100 80 60 40 20 0

Toilet Facilities

Ways to improve the toilet facilities (Female)
1% 22% 6% 11% 21% 13% 26% HANDSOAPS / HAND SANITIZERS / AIR FRESHENERS RUBBISH BINS TOILET CLEANLINESS / TOILET HYGIENE TOILET PAPERS TOILET FLUSHERS LIGHTINGS & MAINTENANCE

CLEANERS / JANITORS DOING A GOOD JOB AT KEEPING THE TOILET CLEAN? (MALE) POLLS YES NO NO. OF PARTICIPANTS 132 256

Cleaners / Janitors doing a good job at keeping the toilet clean? (Male)
300 200 100 0 YES Polls NO

Cleaners / Janitors doing a good job at keeping the toilet clean? (Male)
YES NO

34%

66%

CLEANERS / JANITORS DOING A GOOD JOB AT KEEPING THE TOILET CLEAN? (FEMALE) POLLS YES NO NO. OF PARTICIPANTS 98 314

Cleaners / Janitors doing a good job at keeping the toilet clean? (Female)
400 300 200 100 0 YES Polls NO

Cleaners / Janitors doing a good job at keeping the toilet clean? (Female)
YES NO

24%

76%

In short, all the data we obtained does not need any further elaboration from us as the data analysed is so obvious that the cafeteria toilet for both gender seriously needs more maintenance and try to improve them to at least like the student centre toilet. From our analysis, we also found out that, students would while having their meal or discussing their work at the canteen, they would actually walk to the student centre toilet if they need to use them rather than using the more convenient toilet provided at the cafeteria.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful