You are on page 1of 4

Peer review & course evaluation

Name: _________________________

Team: ______________________________

A) Self-evaluation Grade your own effort and learning during the course on a scale 1-5. 5 = always 4 = often 3 = sometimes 2 = seldom 1 = not at all

Evaluate the following I contributed with useful ideas in our team I asked my team members for opinions and information I contributed to keeping the team on track (concerning the course and project) I helped the group stay together I encouraged other group members to work, to give their ideas and thoughts I took other group members into consideration when working I made sure everybody in the group understood the project and related tasks I made summaries based on other group members thoughts and ideas I invested time and effort in posting comments in our blog I read relevant books for this projects. I shared thoughts and ideas from the books I read with my team members I participated actively in the workshops. I participated actively in developing the teams ideas and thoughts in Kunstenniemi. My grade (average)

Grade

Comment

Peer review & course evaluation


Name: _________________________ B) Peer review Evaluate the people you have worked with during this course. Write the name of your group members in the columns below. Review each person (fill in the table), and mark as following 5 = always 4 = often 3 = sometimes 2 = seldom 1 = not at all Name of group member Contributed useful ideas Asked for information from other group members and also asked for opinions Helped the group members Helped keep the group focused on the task Helped the group stay together Encouraged other group members to work, to share their ideas and thoughts Made the task more enjoyable Made my own learning more effective Took other group members into consideration when working Made sure everybody in the group understood the project and related tasks Made summaries based on other group members thoughts and ideas Shared information and thougts from reading books, blogs and related sources Posted blog comments Participated in the workshops Contributed to developing thoughts and ideas when working in Kunstenniemi Quality of work done Quantity of work done Grade (average) 5 = excellent 4 = good 3 = average 2 = weak 1 = lousy Team: ______________________________

Peer review & course evaluation


Name: _________________________ C) Course evaluation Give a grade (1-3) for each of the learning methods during the course. Mark as X in the columns below. Grade 3 means it supported your learning, grade 1 means it disrupted your learning. Team: ______________________________

1 Working in teams Workshop 1 @ TuAMK Workshop 2 @ TuAMK Meetings with the client Support and interaction with other Inno58h-teams Writing the team blog Reading freely chosen literature Support by teachers/coaches The Kunstenniemi-session

Open questions What went well?

What did not go so well?

What would you do differently?

Peer review & course evaluation


What can you bring into practice or take with you in terms of future challenges?

What supported your learning most?

If you had 10 000 and were given a task to reward your team members with a sum of money based on how well this person did in the project, how would you distribute 10 000 to your team members?

Other comments?