You are on page 1of 87
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ____________________________________ Charles F. Kerchner, Jr, : Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-00253Lowell T. Patterson, :Darrell James LeNormand, and :Donald H. Nelsen, Jr., ::Plaintiffs, ::v. ::Barack Hussein Obama II, President Elect :of the United States of America, President :of the United States of America, :and Individually, a/k/a Barry Soetoro; :United States of America; :United States Congress; :United States Senate; :United States House of Representatives; :Richard B. Cheney, President of :the Senate, Presiding Officer of Joint :Session of Congress, Vice President of the :United States and Individually; and : Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House and :Individually, ::Defendants. :: ________________________________________________________________________ SECOND AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND PETITION FOR EMERGENCYINJUNCTION, DECLARATORY RELIEF, MANDAMUS, AND QUO WARRANTO ________________________________________________________________________ Mario Apuzzo185 Gatzmer AvenueJamesburg, New Jersey 08831Phone: (732) 521-1900Fax: (732) 521-3906E-mail: apuzzo@erols.com
 _________________________________ 
Case 1:09-cv-00253-JBS-JS Document 3 Filed 02/09/2009 Page 1 of 87
 
2Plaintiffs allege as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This action is founded upon the Constitution of the United States of America.As such, this Court has jurisdiction over defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2).2. This is a civil action claiming violations of the First, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, andTwentieth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America. As such, thisCourt has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.3. This action seeks declaratory relief. As such, this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 2202. ENDNOTE 1.4. This action seeks injunctive relief. As such, this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(4).5. This action is in the nature of mandamus, and seeks to compel thosedefendants which are branches of the United States Government and “officer[s] or employee[s] of the United States or any agency thereof” to perform their duties owed plaintiffs under the First, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, and Twentieth Amendments of theConstitution of the United States. As such, this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1361. Additionally, this court has ancillary jurisdiction over this action sounding inmandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1651(a), for this Court already has original jurisdiction under other statutes already cited herein.6. This action is also in the nature of a petition for quo warranto under the Ninthand Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, asking that Obama be declared under ArticleII to be ineligible to hold the Office of President and Commander in Chief and that he beremoved from that Office if sworn in and be permanently barred from holding that office.
Case 1:09-cv-00253-JBS-JS Document 3 Filed 02/09/2009 Page 2 of 87
 
3This Court has jurisdiction over this petition because plaintiffs claim that their right tothis writ emanates from their rights and powers under the Ninth and Tenth Amendment.Additionally, this court has ancillary jurisdiction over this petition for quo warranto pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1651(a), for this Court already has original jurisdiction over  plaintiffs’ other claims herein.7. This is a civil action in which an officer or employee of the United Statesacting in his official capacity or under color of legal authority and an agency of theUnited States are defendants. Three of the plaintiffs reside in this judicial district and thefourth plaintiff resides within the Third Circuit. No real property is involved in thisaction. Venue is therefore proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e).
PARTIESPlaintiffs
8. Plaintiff,
 Charles F. Kerchner, Jr
., is a citizen of the United States and aresident of the State of Pennsylvania. He served 33 years in the U.S. Naval Reserves as both a Commissioned Officer and an Enlisted person. He enlisted with the U.S. NavalReserve in 1962 as an E-1. He served two years active duty as an enlisted person after which he returned to the U.S. Naval Reserves serving with various drilling reserve units.As a drilling member of the U.S. Naval Reserves, he was advanced at various times untilreaching Chief Petty Officer (E-7) in 1970. In 1976 he was commissioned as a U.S. Naval Reserve Officer and was appointed as an Ensign (O-1), serving as a CommissionedOfficer for 19 years and was promoted to the rank of a full Commander (O-5) in 1992.He served on active duty for training and drilled with various reserve units until he retiredin 1995. Plaintiff took a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution of the
Case 1:09-cv-00253-JBS-JS Document 3 Filed 02/09/2009 Page 3 of 87
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505