EUSTACE CLARENCE MULLINS: Anti-Semitic Propagandist or Iconoclast? The World's Premier Conspiracy Historian On the Jews, the Fed and the " ew World Order" N including notes on " lobal Deception" G , January 1993
Second, Expanded Edition
The first edition of this substantial pamphlet - ISBN 1 871473 56 X - was published in April 1993. The second edition was published in March 1995 - ISBN 1 871473 61 6. Although it has fewer pages the second edition is actually much expanded, due to my then improved typesetting skills. It is this edition that has been published here. In addition to the usual cyber-space adapatations I have made a very few minor textual alterations. For purists the full title is given above.

To Update And Acknowledgments To Text To Conclusion And Afterword To Appendix A: Bibliography To Appendix B To Appendix C To Notes And References Back To Baron Pamphlets Index Back To Site Index

Global Deception Update
Welcome to the second (and hopefully typo-free!) edition of Eustace Mullins: Anti-Semite or Iconoclast? I must apologise for the errors in the first few issues of the first edition. The typos were caused primarily by software incompatibility, but also by my and Mr Taha's incompetence, though as his efforts are entirely voluntary, I can hardly complain. In any case, any errors, factual or technical, are entirely my own. The final, corrected first edition has a white cover; if you purchased one with a coloured cover, please refer to the attached erratum sheet. For the second edition I have expanded considerably the bibliography of conspiracy literature. In particular I have added Cheats At Work; Disinformation, Misinformation, and the "Conspiracy" to Kill JFK Exposed; and Dan Smoot's Invisible Government. I read Cheats At Work years ago and wonder that I failed to include it in the first edition. I will repeat here what I say later: This is the real conspiracy at work. Before you study the Trilateral Commission, the CFR or (Heaven forbid) the Protocols of Zion, read this book. The Invisible Government predates Chesterton's New Unhappy Lords; although I've been aware of it for many years, I read it only quite recently. I came across the Kennedy book only in the last couple of years but didn't read that until after the Global Deception conference. I have to say that I do not believe either that the CIA or the Mafia killed John F. Kennedy. Indeed, the Mafia almost certainly does not exist as an autonomous, hierarchical entity, the "confessions" of Joe Valachi and Tommaso Bucetta notwithstanding. I am currently, when time permits, compiling a booklength bibliography of conspiriology and would be interested to hear from any potential publisher, distributor or source of research funding. Ditto my/our other activities in this field. An additional appendix has been added, which contains the texts of The Rabbi's Speech and A Racial Program For The Twentieth Century, (1). I have also examined Mullins' New History Of The Jews in considerable depth in the section on his entries in Singerman. This quite appalling book is discussed here in considerable detail. After the conference, I contacted David Pidcock of the Islamic Party of Britain in connection with another matter, and he told me that he had been down to speak at the meeting but that Mary Seal had withdrawn his invitation. Originally, two other speakers had been arranged, but in the event, neither of them had turned up. Pidcock was not happy with Seal, and said that it was all very nice talking about flying saucers, but when it came down to the corrupt financial system, even the likes of Seal were not keen on tackling the real issue head on. (2) Also, I heard from Mary Seal who was rather more complimentary about me than about the press, but in view of their ridiculing her sincere efforts to expose (what she considers to be) a massive conspiracy, this was hardly surprising. I also sent a transcript of part of the Mullins' interview to the Anti-Defamation League and requested some information from them on his activities. I received no answer. Amusingly, the Jewish conspiracy theory was given a boost when the ADL was finally jumped on by the authorities for its over-zealous activities in monitoring "anti-

Semitism". A National Socialist contact sent me a copy of The Truth At Last (issue 365) (3) which revealed that the Anti-Defamation League's office in Los Angeles was raided by police on April 8, 1993 who removed over three hundred files of documents. The ADL was said to have kept dossiers on 12,000 private citizens and 950 organisations including the United Farm Workers Union and Greenpeace! The mind boggles. Hopefully this obnoxious organisation will now lose its tax-exempt status. It is these sort of activities as much as anything else which is responsible for the deluge of conspiracy and hate literature which all Jews have to live with. Robin Ramsay reviewed the first edition in Lobster issue 25, (pages 23-4), where he suggested that it should have been typeset more professionally. I had already been flirting with this idea, the only obstacle being that a 10 point bold font did not print satisfactorily with my then current software. This problem has now been overcome. On the subject of the AIDS conspiracy theory, it was claimed in Lobster, December 1992, issue, 24, page 21, that this was originated as black propaganda by the Soviet Union. A much more plausible explanation appeared in the lunatic, "feminist"/lesbian anti-male hate (and now thankfully defunct) magazine Spare Rib. An article in the July 1992 issue reported that AIDS had been created deliberately as part of a plot (the King Alfred Plan) to bring about the extinction of American blacks by the year 2000. The source of this new blood libel was in reality a story published in an Indian newspaper, the Patriot, which quoted a well-known US scientist and anthropologist, who is alleged to have claimed it originated from a virus created by the US germ warfare department at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Needless to say, this scientist cum anthropologist was so famous that he chose to remain anonymous. Obviously fearful of reprisals. Like that other nonsense the Protocols Of Zion, this nonsense has already spread to the far corners of the Earth; I saw a version of it recently in an Islamic magazine published here in the UK. Having said all that, it may of course not be nonsense at all, but Dr Strecker's view that AIDS is too clever to have arisen in nature is not shared by, for example, James Le Fanu, who says it is too clever to be man-made! "Man is incapable of creating something like AIDS. We're not bright enough, we don't know enough about virology to create pathogenic viruses, especially something as virulent as AIDS. A lot of people don't appreciate the astonishing sort of Old Testament fury of the AIDS virus. It's astonishing that because of the nature of the AIDS virus, the only treatment that was available, couldn't be used." (4) Astonishing as that may be, it is nowhere near as astonishing as the fact that the first edition of ECM has been branded anti-Semitic! I kid you not. I can't go into too much detail here because this matter is currently the subject of legal proceedings, but I will say that an attempt is being made to use it against me (as anti-Semitica) by the defendant in a libel case. The defendant is none other than Gerry Gable, who I am suing the arse off. Gable's defence was served on me on December 13, 1994 and accuses me of "[defending] or [excusing] notorious anti-semites such as Lady Birdwood, Louis Farrakhan, Ernst Zundel, Eustace Mullins and White racist extremists generally..."

Update Notes And References

(1) This was to have been included in the first edition but was omitted. Yet another error! (2) Pidcock has a no-holds-barred attitude to financial reform. The Islamic Party's paper Common Sense frequently carries articles attacking usury. (3) This is a notorious anti-Semitic, Christian Fundamentalist newspaper, formerly known as the Thunderbolt. The raid on the ADL's offices was reported worldwide, including in the Jewish press here, the wailing and gnashing of teeth Jewish Chronicle. There are really no disputing the facts of the case, only the interpretation of them. The usual excuse is that there is one law for Gentiles and quite another for Jews, as of course the struggle against eternal anti-Semitism is so much more important than such fine details as civil liberties. (4) Author's interview with James Le Fanu, February 1, 1993. Dr James Le Fanu is in general practice in South London. He is medical columnist for the Sunday Telegraph and has a background of eight years in hospital practice, and research into chronic lung disease.

I would like to extend my thanks to the following persons: Mark Taha for doublechecking my researches and for proofing the manuscript; two persons whom I will not identify. Mary Seal and Keith Mears for taking time out to speak to me; and, most of all, to Mr Eustace Mullins for willingly and good-humouredly subjecting himself to an at times hostile cross-examination at a minute's notice. Alexander Baron, Sydenham, London, England. January 23, 1993 Updated February 15, 1995

Back To Cover To Text To Conclusion And Afterword To Appendix A: Bibliography To Appendix B To Appendix C To Notes And References Back To Baron Pamphlets Index Back To Site Index

Eustace Clarence Mullins: Anti-Semitic Propagandist Or Iconoclast? A Note To The Reader
This publication is not for neophytes; although I have added a few footnotes, comprehension does presuppose a certain familiarity with the major players of the world conspiracy and with the relevant literature. I have tried to avoid referencing the text extensively, because although such a procedure may be considered more scholarly, reading a plethora of footnotes can be a drag, and tends to interfere with the reader's continuity. A selected bibliography is provided in Appendix A.

By Way Of An Apology
This publication is based on day one of a two-day seminar held at Wembley Conference Centre and on a half hour off-the-cuff interview with Eustace Mullins. Although all the dialogue which appears herein has been transcribed accurately, it has been subject to severe editing and some of it has been transposed. This is solely for the reader's benefit to ensure continuity and to aid comprehension. None of the three people interviewed has been wilfully traduced, and, unlike the Guardian and other publications of the "quality" press, I have not put words into anyone's mouth. Having said that, any mistakes of inference or of fact are of course entirely my own. The interview with Eustace Mullins is, I am afraid, woefully inadequate, due mainly to limitations of time and a dearth of research material on his background. I would particularly have liked to have pushed him on The Rabbi's Speech and his publishing of anti-Jewish "hate literature", for, even if one takes Mr Mullins at face value as the likable rogue he undoubtedly is, some of his earlier work is simply inexcusable. (1)

Global Deception: Background And Observations
I have been involved with the extreme right since the start of the eighties, and since 1988 I have been researching various aspects of right wing ideology in some considerable depth, none more so than conspiriology. The standard knee jerk reaction to any mention of the "world conspiracy" from the mainstream media is one of contempt, sneering and derision. Those in the media who are more informed are apt to trace any mention of world conspiracy to the Protocols of Zion. Inevitably, charges of anti-Semitism follow, and any further attempt to discuss this difficult subject meaningfully becomes futile. Yet when one examines the evidence and arguments amassed by conspiriologists, dispassionately, one realises that the smears, sneers and derision do not even begin to attempt to refute the conspiracy theory of history, for as one author has pointed out, it can't be refuted. (2)

On the weekend of January 9-10 1993, the Global Deception Conference was held at Wembley, London. There was considerable advance publicity for this conference; if my memory serves me correctly, I heard about it towards the beginning of November 1992. When I read the blurb on the advertising flyer I immediately recognised the name Eustace Mullins: "With 40 years of continuous research and with more than 35 books to his credit, Eustace the world's premier conspiracy historian." Although I was aware that he had written on the Federal Reserve, his name was more familiar to me as an anti-Semitic propagandist and fabricator of the worst possible sort. I had not, and at the time of the first edition, read any of his books. (3) In spite of my interest in conspiriology, as soon as I saw the name Mullins on the list of speakers, my first inclination was to run a mile. I remembered the phrase: Jews mass poison American children - which I had come across in my researches into anti-Jewish fabrication the previous year. I figured that anyone who wrote something as perverted as that (of which more anon), had to be totally off his trolley. And frankly, the other speakers booked for this conference - the main theme of which appeared to be AIDS didn't look any more promising. It was only much closer to the conference date that I decided I would attend on one day and hear what Mr Mullins and his fellow cranks had to say. And, I thought, if I could interview him in person, there might be a pamphlet in it. I attended the conference on the Saturday, and, after queuing up to buy a ticket, arrived in the auditorium a couple of minutes into Dr Strecker's first presentation. On the way in I met Lady Birdwood, and we exchanged a few words. I made a mental note to introduce her to Mullins if I could. Ticket sales for the event were disastrous. Organiser Seal, who had spent a colossal sum staging the event, was angry with the press for the way they had apparently boycotted the conference. This morning she was livid with the Guardian which, she claimed, had libelled her the previous day. (4) This is par for the course for the "quality" press as much as for the tabloids. Naturally, Seal and others saw the hidden hand behind this smear and the silent treatment, but a much more plausible explanation is the usual press arrogance, sarcasm and wantonness. It is also likely that Seal, in spite of her public relations background, has herself to blame as much as the media for poor ticket sales. Any event of this size has to be properly advertised, and I had the distinct impression that she hadn't hyped it up as much as she could have. It is simply not good enough to send out press releases here and there, and, I feel, if she had been more forceful with the various sections of the press: minority, left, homosexual, extreme right, psychics...she would have sold a lot more tickets. It might also have helped to stage a publicity stunt or two. This notwithstanding, she didn't get any favours from any quarter, and it is likely that the media was forewarned about her other speakers besides Mullins. I must admit, if I'd known in advance what Terziski and Summers were going to talk about, I might not have bothered coming myself. Two things which did rather surprise me were that "rent-a-mob" didn't try to stop the conference, and the fact that ethnic minorities were well-represented, especially Moslems. (5) This country has a long and shameful history of communist orchestrated violence against "fascists", and later, racists. Since the 1930s when Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts were attacked by well-organised gangs of "anti-fascist" thugs, Jew and Gentile, (6) right down to the present when groups such as the Anti Nazi League (a front

for the mindlessly violent Trotskyite Socialist Workers Party) and others have used unrelenting pressure against the British National Party and their fellow travellers, it has been all but impossible for anyone on the "extreme right" to hold public meetings without being subjected to intense harassment. This harassment manifests itself in many ways, from violence and intimidation by "anti-fascists" to the banning of meetings and the proscribing of public buildings to "fascists". When someone with Mullins' appalling record as an anti-Semitic propagandist attempts to enter the country, the first group which always screams its head off is Organised Jewry, which manifests itself in Britain through the Board of Deputies of "British" Jews. Fortunately, even the Zionists are beginning to wise up, and instead of furious lobbying and delegations to Downing Street, they waived all protest. Mike Whine of the Board of Deputies described Mullins' views as ridiculous. (7) The interest by non-whites, particularly the blacks who attended, was, I felt, directly related to the alleged AIDS cover-up. Although right wing conspiracy theories may be frowned on - not just the "anti-Semitic" ones - left wing groups are none too shy about formulating their own conspiracy theories, which are often as ridiculous as those of the extreme right. The Black Muslims, for example, are into flying saucers and all sorts of mystical garbage. My impression of Mary Seal and Keith Mears is that they are not in any sense extremists, rather they are sincere people who have come to some rather startling conclusions about the cause of world unrest. Seal claims to have been reading conspiracy literature for twelve years, but admits that she is not well up on UFOs. And obviously she has never come across Philip Klass. (8) Why I ever thought of giving this event a miss I'll never know, but eventually, realising that this was a golden opportunity to put a world-famous anti-Semitic propagandist on the spot, I decided to go to the conference come what may, though I thought it would be a good idea first to seek a commission from a publication to make the event worthwhile. After having a literally disastrous four years or so freelancing, I am loathe now to write for any publication, but I contacted one, New Moon, a relatively new "Jewish events magazine", and went to Finchley to meet one of the editorial staff, Jack Shamash, who has worked on the Jewish Chronicle and seemed, rightly in my opinion, to hold that paper in as high esteem as does the British National Party. I gave Shamash an anti-Semitic pamphlet I'd received from a contact: The Guide To Non-Kosher Food Shopping. (9) He thought it was a riot, and, after photocopying it, pinned the front cover on his office wall! He said that New Moon doesn't pay freelances, which was my second run in with Jewish financial hegemony and mendacity that week. (10) Unperturbed, I suggested to Shamash that he might be able to place an interview with Mullins for me with one of the dailies. Later still, I received a phone call from a character called Guy Ogilvy of RASP, who'd been given my name by a political contact, and he said he'd be interested in a piece on Mullins and a news piece on the conference. (Eventually he reneged on the commission, a not uncommon experience for me, and I sued the magazine in the County Court). Then came the conference and the presentations: first Strecker, then Mullins.

Doctor Strecker's Presentation
Dr Strecker's speech was certainly impressive. It was of a purely scientific nature, and its theme was that because AIDS is a syndrome rather than a disease, and because of its complexity, the possibility of its having arisen naturally is so small as to be unthinkable. To wit, AIDS is a man-made disease, the only question about its origin worth asking being: was it released into the environment intentionally or did it escape by accident? When Strecker began his presentation there could have been no more than a hundred people in the auditorium. His thesis developed along these lines. AIDS arose out of an attempt to create cancer in the laboratory. AIDS, in spite of its main method of transmission, is not a sexually transmitted disease, but a blood-borne pathogen. It does not grow in the venereal tract, and is transferred by the macrophages in the cells, something which has major implications for vaccine development. All this sounds sound enough, although one can of course nit pick over the meaning of STD etc., but his claim that AIDS will decimate Africa and India, and the unreasonably high rate of infection for the United States does not seem to be consistent with what is actually happening. (11) Strecker though went much further than even this. He claimed that in 1975 a scientist predicted the spread of a pandemic cancer, and that scientists were already growing such viruses. He cited the well-documented (and quite scandalous) Tuskegee syphilis experiment in which hundreds of rural Southern black men were left untreated in order to monitor the progress of the disease. (12) He also mentioned brainwashing experiments by the CIA and the Federal Government, and claimed that court judgments have been given against the authorities in these matters. All the above is quite plausible, certainly the suggestion that the CIA or the Federal Government (or an arm of them) would not engage in such dirty tricks is even more absurd, and medical trials are a reality. (13) However, the claim that AIDS has been deliberately engineered as a weapon of mass destruction borders on the surreal and should not be entertained without a far higher degree of proof than that adduced by Dr Strecker. Moreover, this claim has distinct parallels with one particular piece of anti-Semitic garbage which Mr Mullins churned out in the 1950s. (14) And although the New World Order is anything but a fantasy, the people involved in it are concerned primarily with manipulating the financial system and undermining our human rights and civil liberties, not with wiping us out in so direct a manner. Eustace Mullins was the second speaker, but before I return to him I will mention the ravings of Vladimir Terziski, the nonsense of David Summers, and the interesting if speculative claims of William Cooper.

Vlad The Mad
According to the blurb on the flyer for the Global Deception Conference, Vladimir Terziski holds a BSc. in Physics and an MSc. in both Sociology and Electronics. He is quoted as saying that: "In my research as a physicist I have arrived at the unexpected

conclusion that anti-gravity is extremely easy to produce without any Sci-Fi hardware..." He also arrived at some other and far more startling conclusions. Namely that the Nazis had developed flying saucer technology and that they had established bases on Antarctica and the Moon. Hitler's merry men reached the Moon in 1938 apparently. Terziski said they also had a time machine, but I'm not quite sure that he meant a Doctor Who type affair. It was difficult to understand exactly what he did mean, or to take him seriously at all, especially when he went on about Nazis building flying saucers for the Peron government in Argentina after the War, and the quite astounding claim that a team of Nazis and Japanese had crash-landed a flying saucer on the planet Mars in 1945. This craft was said to be the size of a football field. The thing which made my mind up not to come back for more of the same the next day was his claim that he would produce "evidence" that the British had landed on the Moon in the 1890s! He also went on about crop circles and other preposterous nonsense. Remember, this guy is a highly qualified scientist with two degrees in hard sciences. To be scrupulously fair to Terziski, he did produce some interesting photographs of gyroscopes. His claim that 90% of UFOs have rotational symmetry on a vertical axis was far less impressive than the claim that the faster you spin a gyroscope, the less it weighs. I couldn't help feeling he was confusing weight with mass here, but if it is true that clocks run slower next to gyroscopes, this could certainly open up fruitful lines of research. How come all this hasn't been made public before? Simply because the invisible government of the New World Order has masterminded a massive disinformation campaign through the tabloid press. He called this government the Illuminati (15), for want of a better word, and said this group had also bankrolled the Nazis, whom he suggested were in the pay of Satan. Whether or not this was a metaphor, it was too much for a certain Mr G_____, a geriatric nationalist whom I have come across before. [John Gaster (now deceased)]. At this point he stood up and lambasted Terziski, calling him a dirty liar and telling him to name the real culprits: the International Jews! For all his talk, Terziski does not appear to know the secret of anti-gravity himself, but he is, in my humble opinion, unquestionably sincere. I cannot say the same for David Summers.

The Wonder From Down Under
According to the conference advertising leaflet, David M. Summers is an Australian journalist with the Australian News Syndicate. Over the past nine years he has travelled in over fifty countries - nice work if you can get it. In at least two of those countries, Summers claims not only to have seen UFOs but to have photographed them personally. He claims to have observed one of these craft - the one he saw in Pakistan - for a total of 75 minutes. As well as his own dubious photographs, Summers showed a number taken by a gentleman named Meier. (16) These were of an Adamski-type (17), and by all accounts Meier is a latter day Adamski clone. He is said to be an invalid with one arm. Anyone who gives more than a second's notice to his claims must have half a brain.

Meier's photos, which, if my memory serves me correctly, Summers claimed had either not been refuted or had been authenticated, are too absurd for words. One showed a giant tin apparently hovering over a tractor. Meier has had a number of close encounters, and, naturally, his contacts speak to him in German. What else could one expect from Nazis? A 1979 photograph, which may or may not be one of Meier's, shows a craft emblazoned with a swastika, and Nazis in the cockpit! Commenting on the lack of clarity of most UFO photographs, Summers claimed this was due to the fields around the saucers! This is a good one. But Meier's photos were far from unclear, rather they were too good to be true. When I spoke to Seal later, I asked her why she had invited a couple of obvious cranks like Terziski and Summers. This part of the conversation went as follows: Question: You believe all the UFO stuff? MS: No, I don't believe they're extraterrestrial craft. Question: Do you believe all this stuff about UFOs at the South Pole and all that? It's garbage. MS: I'm sorry, I know nothing about UFOs at the South Pole; I've never looked into that question, and it's quite possible it is garbage. I had him [Vladimir Terziski] come over to explain anti-gravity propulsion (as a physicist). Of course, he's done his own research, and he's presented part of that research... [Later, Seal denied that she had ever said she knew nothing about UFOs and claimed that she had been looking into this subject for some time, as obviously she has, but I think this is just as obviously a misunderstanding on her part and refers specifically to the claim that UFOs emanate from the South Pole]. Question: But all the stuff he's said about UFOs landing on the Moon... MS: I do believe that NASA has got a secret space programme, that I do believe. Question: But [David Summers] mentioned the MJ-12 saucer crash documents. They are proven fakes. (18) MS: Those are fakes. He mentioned them within the context of his whole speech to show the amount of disinformation which is deliberately being pushed. Question: And he claimed to have seen [and photographed] UFOs on more than one occasion. MS: David, yeah. Question: I don't believe that; I think he's a bare-faced liar. MS: Why do you say that? Question: It's pushing the point a bit, isn't it? MS: What would you say if I told you I'd seen a UFO, would you believe me? Question: You saw a flying saucer? MS: I saw a flying saucer. Question: How many times? MS: I saw one in daylight, then I saw [a] light and then I saw another object. Question: But did you see a flying saucer? MS: I saw something resembling the classic mother ship shape out of which came three objects. Question: He [David Summers] also virtually authenticated George Adamski, who was the most brazen, bare-faced liar who ever lived. MS: No, he hasn't authenticated George Adamski; he has made the point that the Adamski craft is exactly the same as the Nazi-developed craft.

Question: But Adamski was a bare-faced liar. MS: Adamski was working for the FBI, and I have documents to prove it. Question: He was working for the FBI? MS: Of course. He was spreading disinformation. I have documents to prove that Adamski was under the influence of the FBI, and he was deliberately spreading the extraterrestrial myth. Question: What documents are these? MS: They are Freedom of Information documents that prove that the FBI had connection with Adamski [which] went on [for] four or five years. Question: His campaign went on a lot longer than that, didn't it? He wrote three books. (19) MS: Disinformation. Disinformation all the time. Question: So you think there are flying saucers... MS: I think that governments have got highly classified top secret technology which they won't make known because they have their own agenda. According to all the speakers who mentioned UFOs - Terziski, Summers and Cooper they operate on independent gravitational fields, whatever that means. They have to overcome the G Forces generated by making 90 and 180 degree turns at fantastic speeds. Obviously if there were living beings aboard, then, as we understand the laws of physics, they would be mashed to pulp. This is not to say that we cannot rewrite the laws of physics as we understand them, but before we overturn the enormous body of scientific evidence which tells us that such things are impossible, we will need much stronger evidence than was presented here. Summers stated uncategorically that UFOs exist, and that many UFO groups are run by intelligence agencies and by New Age groups, ie liars and cranks. The Roswell incident was yet another example of disinformation by the Illuminati. [Don't forget, we have to call it something.] The really unfortunate part of Summers' presentation was that when he started to talk about plain, old-fashioned deception and disinformation, he made a great deal of sense. All the disinformation on UFOs was, he claimed, part and parcel of the campaign to destroy human rights and civil liberties worldwide. Undoubtedly there is a lot of disinformation in the UFO movement, but most of it comes from cretins like Summers rather than from covert CIA and NSA operations and the like. Summers quoted extensively from the Spotlight and dragged in the New World Order, the CFR etc. UFOs are a political bombshell, he said, one of the greatest geo-political secrets of our times. More kids die each year than all the Jews who died in the Nazi concentration camps. (20) So what is the point of all this? UFOs are being used as a deliberate ploy by the conflict managers and peddlers of crisis to enslave us in a world supra-government. Crisis management is not a new idea, it is one which is peddled all the time by the state paternalists and other collectivists. It goes something like this: The problems we face are not just difficult, they are virtually insurmountable. The only way we can solve them is by sacrificing all our civil liberties and subjecting all our business and social activity to state control.

As I said, the argument is not a new one; it's sinister, devious and mendacious as well as fallacious, but is it a conspiracy? (21) This view is shared by William Cooper (of whom more anon), Mary Seal, Keith Mears, and, undoubtedly, a great many other people. Question: You say there's this campaign to convince us that we're under attack from outer space? Mary Seal: Yeah. Question: That's not a new idea, that was actually mooted in a novel called Wild Card back in 1974. (22) MS: Yes, this idea has been going on since the 30s, War of the Worlds. Question: What do you think we should do about it? Do you think the root of all evil is the financial system, credit creation? MS: Of course it is, and the root of all evil is also advanced technology, because when you have advanced technology, you can control people, you have the superiority over them. So really the whole crux of the question is the UFO phenomena [sic] in all this; you look into the UFO phenomena and everything else suddenly makes sense. David Rockefeller must laugh up his sleeve when he hears talk like this. For all his ridiculous talk and clever photomontages, Summers did say one or two things that were worthwhile, particularly the way police powers have been greatly increased in the United States under the pretext of fighting the "war on drugs". The same thing has of course happened here, and the media still relentlessly pursues this red herring under the guise of rooting out the wicked drugs barons instead of asking what right the government has to decide what you can shove up your own nose.

William Cooper
William Cooper's presentation was a curious mixture of unsubstantiated speculation and undeniable fact. As well as talking, he showed a film about mysterious goings-on at a secret US Air Force base in the Nevada Desert. Both the film and his talk dragged on and on, but there can be no doubt that under all the speculation and hype, there is something going on. The Stealth fighter aircraft is no flying saucer, although it certainly looks like one from the right angle, and there is definitely something happening in the desert which the US Government does not want the people to know about. (23) One very interesting point Cooper made was the campaign against CFCs. Ozone depletion, he said, is a myth, and backed up this claim with quotes from scientists. On 26th September 1992, the Libertarian Alliance held a conference on the Environment, and concluded much the same. The explanation mooted for the environmentalist panic at the LA conference was that the ecology movement has been taken over by demagogues, collectivists, paternalists and careerists. Cooper though had a very interesting (and plausible) conspiratorial explanation: the patents for CFCs are running out! (24)

At the end of the first day of the conference, members of the audience were invited to question the speakers. Unfortunately, this resulted in a number of lunatics assailing the platform, including one woman who referred to the "miracle" at Fatima, and a man who claimed (or at least postulated) that Hitler had thirteen lamas in the bunker with him when he committed suicide. A pigmented gentleman (as David Irving would say), who was obviously a Moslem, asked if he understood correctly that certain Jewish people were behind the New World Order. In short, was this the Jewish world conspiracy again? Fortunately, Cooper's answer was as sensible as Terziski's presentation had been absurd. There is a conspiracy, and there are Jews involved. There are also people of other faiths and none involved. The Jewish grocer down your street is just as much a victim as you. Mary Seal put it much the same way when I spoke to her earlier: Mary Seal: You can trace all these people [the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group], but it's nothing to do with the Jews or the Catholics... Question: The reason it looks like the Jews is because there have been a lot of Jews involved in it. MS: Of course. Question: Many people think that if there is a conspiracy with fifty members and ten of them are Jews... MS: It's not a Jewish conspiracy...I think the Jewish people are being used by these people, I do believe that, and I do believe that they will suffer as much as we will when this New World Order comes in.

Eustace Mullins' Speech
Mullins' thesis was that modern governments cannot survive without an external threat, and that since the time of the Russian Revolution, and indeed before, the conflict managers and empire-building bureaucrats have consciously manufactured one external threat after another. World War I was fought for economic reasons, Germany was taking British markets. The latter claim is unquestionably true, as is the claim, often made by other writers, that the Versailles Treaty set the world on course for World War II. There was no mention as yet, nor indeed in Mullins' entire speech of Jews (as Jews), and it should be noted that this interpretation of history is not incompatible with mainstream Marxism. The idea is that "Imperialism" wants/needs war. The most cursory examination reveals this argument to be deeply flawed. What Imperialism wants is markets, and the only reason it wants markets is because of a serious flaw in the financial system: the acute deficiency of purchasing power. Why else should any nation want to sell capital and consumer goods when its own infrastructure needs developing and improving, and when its own citizens can benefit from the consumer goods it can produce in abundance? Rightly or wrongly, Mullins blamed the Bank of England for World War II. He mentioned the Jekyll Island conspirators and the institution of the Federal Reserve something which has since been documented by many authors. (25) During the First World War, the House of Morgan financed the British government, and the British

Secret Service rather than the Jews were behind the Bolshevik Revolution. With the Bolshevik seizure of power, Russia was removed from the world scene as a competitor for foreign markets, a theme also emphasised by Sutton, and, indeed, Sutton goes further, suggesting that not only was the Soviet Union removed as a competitor, but that it was reserved as a captive market for the monopoly capitalists. (26) The Sutton revelations make this clear, indeed, this is the ugly fact that lies behind the myth of the Cold War. Forget all the talk about "We will bury you", forget the race to the Moon, forget the dirty tricks of the KGB and the CIA, forget the phony Cuba missile crisis and the arms race, forget all the dross about the communist menace, the reds under the bed and the "Evil Empire of the Soviet Union", this was all just window dressing. The true facts are very different: the Soviet Union would never even have existed, much less survived, without the explicit financial and technological assistance of the United States and the rest of the "Free World" from the Bolshevik seizure of power to the present day. Whatever the politicians say, whatever the intellectual prostitutes of the controlled media say or don't say, whatever the Socialist Workers' Party or the KGB itself believe, the Soviet Union was made in the USA and has existed by dint of handouts disguised as peaceful trade since its inception. (27) Early in his speech, Mullins made the statement: "Your greatest enemy - no matter what your nationality - is your own government." If you are an American, that is certainly true. It is only a pity that he did not say this forty years ago instead of attempting to lay all the blame on the Jews. What is one to make of Mullins' British conspiracy angle of the Bolshevik Revolution? Certainly the Americans, the British and the Germans aided the Bolsheviks. As Sutton has written, "Historians must never forget that Woodrow Wilson ...made it possible for Leon Trotsky to enter Russia with an American passport." (28) As well as the dubious activities of the Warburg brothers, Mullins claimed that Lenin was poisoned by Stalin, and later in his speech he likened the Democrats and the Republicans to the Trotskyite and Stalinist wings of the Bolsheviks. That's what Irangate was all about. It was the Washington equivalent of the Moscow show trial. This appears to have caused some confusion, to my fellow researcher at least, but he did not mean that the Democrats and the Republicans were literally communists. Mullins' claim that the Fed is run from London is not entirely convincing. 53% of the stock of the Federal Reserve is owned by banks chartered in London was what he actually said, but added that it is an hereditary monopoly that is controlled from London. Some of his claims in connection with the Second World War are extremely interesting, but if they are to be taken seriously, they will require a very high degree of proof, which in all likelihood will never be forthcoming. (29) Mullins claimed that Hitler never wanted war with Britain, which, in spite of the lies which still saturate the controlled media, is a fact that cannot reasonably be disputed by serious historians. (30) However, his claims that the Anglo-German Fellowship duped Hitler into war and that he attacked Stalin in 1941 because of this are highly speculative. And what are we to make of the claim that Charles Lindbergh was married off to one of the conspirators'

daughters to keep him out of the way and that the kidnap and murder of the Lindbergh baby was all part of the same plot? However plausible are these claims, the claims Mullins makes about himself are far less so; in many ways they are self-serving: His book, Secrets of the Federal Reserve was, he said, commissioned by Ezra Pound, who paid him ten dollars a week to write it, while still incarcerated. (31) This is undoubtedly true, and it may be true also that Mullins was under surveillance by the FBI for 33 years, but this needs some qualification. (32) He joined the staff of the Library of Congress, and, he claims he was sacked because he was writing for the Social Crediter. This does not ring true. (See interview). He also made the curious claim that Major Douglas did not understand that taxation is an instrument of social control. Anyone who reads Douglas will realise how absurd this claim really is. The suggestion that J. Edgar Hoover tried to have him, Mullins, "nutted off" because he wrote to the press accusing the FBI of being a tool of the communists may indeed be well-founded, but anyone who seriously believes the FBI to be a communist front probably deserves to be nutted off. Although many of his claims may sound outrageous (to the uninitiated), his speech was totally free from anti-Semitism. Before the recess, I caught up with Mullins and told him that I would like to interview him at length. I told him that I was covering the conference for a Jewish magazine but that I myself am not Jewish. I also told him that I was researching into conspiriology myself. He agreed willingly and we went in search of somewhere to conduct the interview. We ended up in his dressing room. Here then, with additional notes, is what he had to say: Question: May I ask how old you are, sir? Eustace Mullins: I'm seventy years old. Question: You don't look it. EM: Thank you. People tell me that. Question: You're the protegé of Ezra Pound? EM: I am, the last living protegé as a matter of fact, and of course you know four of his protegés got the Nobel Prize, but I haven't yet. [Laughing.] Question: I've only ever found one of your books in the British Library, that's your biography of Pound which I was looking through the other day. (33) EM: I don't have distribution in England, but I should have. I'm negotiating with a couple of publishers because I think there's quite a market here. Question: Which publishers? EM: Routledge Kegan and, I forget the other one; Routledge Kegan are quite interested. Question: Have you tried any of the other distributors: Historical Review Press or Bloomfield Books? (34) EM: No, I haven't, I won't be able to pursue those things but I hope to come back in a few weeks and get something going. I think my books are ready to be distributed here. Question: I haven't actually read any of your books, but I have read a fair amount of conspiracy theory: Gary Allen and people like that. EM: These are spin offs from me. Gary Allen ordered all my books before he wrote his

books, and frankly attributed his work to me [in early printings] but later he dropped it out. Question: Was that None Dare Call It Conspiracy? EM: Yes, in early editions he quoted extensively from my work, but later that was eliminated. I pretty much pioneered in the development of this World Order conspiracy after World War Two through Pound's work. Pound had already worked on it thirty years or so himself. Question: I haven't read much Pound but I have read a fair amount of Douglas and I am very sympathetic to his ideas. Have you come across Kitson at all? (35) EM: Oh yes, Pound put me onto Kitson, Douglas, all those people. Question: What about Mrs Emery in the United States? EM: Mrs Emery, that name does ring a bell. Question: The People's Party back in the 1890s. EM: I don't go back that far with the populists. Most of the people I work with in the States today call themselves populists. Clinton is calling himself a populist. [Laughing.] Question: I found a small book of hers called Seven Financial Conspiracies Which Have Enslaved The American People; it was published in 1892. (36) EM: I think I encountered that book at the Library of Congress quite a few years ago. It's quite an interesting book. I did most of my research at the Library of Congress. There I came into contact with a lot of sources that I would not have found elsewhere. Question: It's nearly as big as the British Library, the Library of Congress, isn't it? EM: Yes. Question: What university did you graduate from? EM: Washington Lee, which is called the Princeton of the South. It was founded by Washington and Lee, both of whom would have been hung for treason. Question: You've published about thirty-five books? EM: Yes, covering a multitude of subjects, pamphlets and so forth. There are actually fifteen books available now in bound form of which The Federal Reserve was one of the first, then The World Order, Curse of Canaan, Writ for Martyrs and Murder By Injection, each of these exposes a different conspiracy. I'll be talking tomorrow about the medical conspiracy. Question: I don't know if I'll be here tomorrow. Who publishes your books? EM: I self-publish, self-distribute because there's no publishing house in the United States which would publish these books. Question: Not even the Noontide Press? EM: I work with Noontide; Noontide is distributing my books but I still prefer to keep on publishing myself. Question: Who finances them? EM: I finance all my books out of my cash flow; they sell very well. Question: Are you a man of independent means? EM: No, actually I live on my books and on my income from speaking and so forth. (37) Question: Do you have any connection with Willis Carto and company? (38) EM: Yes, they're one of the main distributors of my books. I've know Willis since 1952. They do promote my books and have publicised me quite a bit over the last several years. Question: You have been called an anti-Semite. EM: Oh yes, regularly, Ezra Pound was also called an anti-Semite. And in fact Ezra, in his radio broadcasts, did become quite anti-Jewish in the late forties, because he felt that the Jews had played that role and had instigated the War. He probably over-emphasised that, but at the same time he never had any prejudice against working with Jewish poets

like [name unintelligible] and Stephen Spender and so forth. (39) Many Jews came to visit Pound during [unintelligible but probably a reference to Pound's incarceration after the War]. Question: Personally I don't believe Pound was an anti-Semite. EM: No, he wasn't an anti-Semite, and neither am I myself. Question: I would have to take issue with that. [If you're no longer an anti-Semite] you have been. Tell me about The Rabbi's Speech. [See Appendix C for the full text of The Rabbi's Speech and A Racial Program For The Twentieth Century.] EM: The Rabbi's Speech was brought to me, and I felt it was an important document which should be released, and it was released, and actually was translated in Europe by Einar Aberg of Sweden, and he flooded the continent with it, many thousands of copies. Actually, now that you mention it, I haven't heard of that in many years. It came out in '52. Question: It's been republished fairly recently. EM: Has it really? I haven't seen that. Question: It was published by Lady Birdwood. Have you heard of Lady Birdwood? (40) EM: Oh yes, I've heard of her. Has she republished it? Question: Yes. [And she believes every single word of it!] EM: I'll be damned. Question: A Racial Program For The Twentieth Century. EM: Yes, oh the Israel Cohen [book - which never existed!]. Well, that again was something that was done a long time ago, and it keeps popping up. And I have no connection with anybody who's reprinting or distributing any of these things at the present time. Question: Where did you obtain that from? EM: I got that at the Library of Congress, I think it's in the Congressional Record, I'm not sure. It goes back a long way. [Laughing.] Question: Let me put this to you as diplomatically as I can. The Rabbi's Speech and Israel Cohen's A Racial Program For The Twentieth Century are notorious anti-Semitic fabrications, the products of a sick, diseased mind. Yours. EM: Really. [Laughing.] That's a rather harsh decision. I couldn't agree with that. Question: Okay, let's try some other stuff: Jews Mass Poison American Children. EM: Gosh, I don't even remember that one. You're going back about forty years. At my age I don't remember things as well as I did. Question: This was published in June 1955. I'm taking this from page 215 of ANTISEMITIC PROPAGANDA: An Annotated Bibliography and Research Guide, by Robert Singerman, published by Garland, (1982). [See Appendix B for Mullins' entries in this bibliography.] EM: I've never seen that. Question: You've got a few entries in it. EM: Have I? A lot of things pop up...I will say that a lot of things have been circulated with my name on them. [Mullins laughed here and tried to make a joke out of it.] Question: Do you deny that you wrote an article on the Salk vaccine? EM: I wrote an article on what? Question: On the Salk polio vaccine?

EM: I may have. That again is going far back. As you see, my books over the last twenty-five years don't deal with anything [like that] because I went into deeper research on other subjects and I was no longer interested in those things. Question: The Biological Jew, which was published circa 1968, is another of your works, I believe. I haven't seen it but it's been described as a nasty little book. Perhaps you'd like to tell me why it isn't nasty. EM: Interestingly enough, that whole theory came to me from Joe McWilliams, who was also called an anti-Semite. He was a leader of a Christian front back in the forties in New York City. (41) He was an Irish Catholic and he had practically all of the Irish policemen in New York City as members of his group. And he developed this theory that Jewish people over the years had developed a parasitic method of life, [battening] on their host and so on. So I developed that, I did some work on parasitism at the Library of Congress, and it was a viable theory, and I published this book in 1968. It's never been republished, but it's still floating around. Question: You think Jews are parasites? EM: This was a study of Jews in European history as a parasitic organism, and Pound himself believed that, he thought that the ghettos were a sort of parasitic enclave in the cities of Europe, so it was certainly a theory worth pursuing, and I pursued it, though I've never done any more on it [sic] since 1968. (42) Question: I don't know about parasitic, though they're certainly paranoid, but with certain people [like you] around, they've every right to be. Your book, Mullins' New History of the Jews was described by no less a person than A.K. Chesterton as rabidly anti-Semitic in Candour magazine in an article entitled THIS MAN IS DANGEROUS. (43) EM: Oh yes, I saw that, and interestingly enough, not long after that, A.K. Chesterton wrote to me appealing for me to help me collect royalties from a publisher - we had the same publisher [Serpico?] of California - so after attacking me like this, a few weeks later Chesterton writes to me asking me to do anything I could [sic] to help him collect royalties from Serpico, which no one could collect royalties from Serpico [sic], there was nothing I could do. But I thought it was chutzpah on his part, first he denounces me, then he asks for my help. [The fact that Chesterton asked him for help (if he did) hardly mitigates the tone of the article, which was spot on. Incidentally, I personally believed the Israel Cohen quote was genuine for many years because it seemed just the sort of stupid, asinine thing a Jewish communist would say. Readers of Socialist Worker will understand why.] Question: Money talks the same language. Now, you said you were hounded by the FBI and that you were kicked out of the Library of Congress because of your researches. EM: I was under daily surveillance for thirty-three years, my file shows that. And I was fired by direct FBI intervention, but they were sent over by Senator Herbert Lehman who was at that time National Chairman of the Anti-Defamation League. I'm still battling the ADL by the way, I have a thirty million dollar lawsuit going against a newspaper in the States now on that same thing. Question: Leaving aside the fact that the ADL is a somewhat feisty organisation, it was reported in a book, They Never Said It, by a person whose name escapes me, that you were sacked by the Library of Congress for distributing anti-Semitica. (44) EM: No, that's totally false, the record shows that's totally false because I actually sued the Library of Congress for reinstatement, and in their denial of reinstatement, they did not mention that, which they certainly would have, if that had been the case. I've never

seen that claim anywhere in print. It's totally false. I have all the documents relating to my dismissal, which was as a probationary employee. And that was never mentioned as a cause; what they said was that I had been writing for the Social Crediter, but they did not say that it was anti-Semitic. The Social Crediter had articles which were critical of the Jews, but mainly it was not what you'd call an anti-Semitic newspaper. Question: I don't believe Douglas was an anti-Semite. EM: No, he was not, and the Social Crediter was not an anti-Semitic paper. I think it's out of print now, but I'm not sure. Question: In 1968 you published My Life in Christ, which is described by Singerman as "90 pages, explains how Marxist Jews and the Mafia control the FBI and the CIA". EM: Yes, in fact that theme is further developed in my book A Writ For Martyrs which is much longer, which contains 120 pages [reproduced from] my FBI file. Question: Impeach Eisenhower? EM: That was a pamphlet; I was a pamphleteer in those days, and this lady had published this little paper in Chicago, and I wrote some rather inflammatory things for her at that time. Question: Like: Eisenhower is a willing tool of his Jewish advisers, all of whom are international communist agents? EM: Well, that was the [headline] on this thing which was put on by this lady - the editor - she was very, openly anti-Semitic. She actually put some of these headlines on my articles, which were inflammatory. At that time I was working with her, and she was pretty much running it the way she wanted to. Question: Who was she? EM: Mrs Lyrl Clark Van Hyning, and the paper was called Women's Voice: We The Mothers United For America. These were the mothers' groups who went to Washington and picketed Roosevelt because he was trying to get us into the Second World War. In other words, these mothers did not want their sons killed in foreign wars. So they were approaching it from a very personal standpoint. [This lady's name was mistakenly given as Lyrl Park Van Hyning in the first edition. Her outfit appears to have been called "We the Mothers Mobilize for America", though this mistake was probably mine]. Question: You also wrote for Christian Vanguard? EM: Oh yes, I was [unclear] for Christian Vanguard for years; that paper's defunct now. Question: It is [or was] a grotesquely anti-Semitic paper; I've seen it. (45) EM: Christian Vanguard was actually a Christian identity newspaper which published most of the articles on Christian identity. It reprinted Dr Wesley Swift, Dr [unclear], but they did have, I guess you would say, anti-Jewish articles from time to time. That paper is defunct now. [Christian Vanguard may have been its name, but there was nothing Christian about it, although it was definitely in the vanguard of extreme anti-Semitism. Issue 50 was a Julius Streicher "Memorial Edition", February 1976, a 16 page translation of the repulsive May 1934 issue of Streicher's hate sheet Der Stürmer. (46)] Question: I read an article in it by Ben Klassen which made out a very strong case against the Federal Reserve, but it was all Jews, Jews, Jews. [This article was actually published by Klassen himself and is listed by Singerman, page 324 (op cit) as The Brutal Truth about Inflation and Financial Enslavement. The Federal Reserve Board, the most

Gigantic Counterfeiting Ring in the World, published by the Church of the Creator, Lighthouse Point, Fla, (1979), 16 pages.] EM: Ben Klassen was very violently anti-Semitic, I've never worked with him. Later, he started his own newspaper called Racial Identity. Question: Racial Loyalty. EM: Racial Loyalty - I've never [had anything to do with that]. Question: Harold Covington described it as Racial Toiletry. (47) EM: Harold Covington's an FBI agent, [that's been] known for many years. Question: He's living in East London at the moment. (48) EM: Is he really? He circulated some very violent smears against me. [Laughing.] Question: With respect, Mr Mullins, with respect to your earlier career, he wouldn't have had to try very hard. Do you deny that you wrote Jews Mass Poison American Children? EM: I don't recall that article at all. Question: On the Salk vaccine. EM: I think there again that was a headline which Mrs Van Hyning put on it, and that that was not what the body of the article was about. When you go back forty or so years it's difficult to remember. And these were very small circulation magazines which had about fifteen hundred circulation throughout the United States. [The fact that the circulation of such publications is very small gives the lie to the wilder claims of Organised Jewry that there are Nazis lurking behind every bush. But it in no way mitigates the content of the articles.] Question: You don't consider yourself an anti-Semite? EM: Not at all, in my latest book, Murder By Injection, I attribute practically all the directions of my research - not that I used any of their material - to Maurice Beal [sic?], Dr Robert Mendelsohn and Dr Emmanuel Josephson [sic?], and I knew the last two very well. These were three Jewish... Question: Robert Mendelsohn published a book called Dissent In Medicine. (49) EM: Yes, he died very suddenly of a heart attack. [He was] a lot younger than I am; a lot of people think he was done in. He was appearing on a lot of national TV shows. He was a licensed MD, [and] a member of the AMA, and he had begun to expose some of the abuses of the medical profession, and he really was an iconoclast, and my impression was that Robert Mendelsohn was a very brilliant, able fellow, and he began to do this out of a sort of snobbery...because he was contemptuous of the other doctors, Jews and non-Jews, that he had to work with. That's why he began to criticise them. (50) Question: Do you believe Jews are parasites? EM: Parasites? Uh, no, as I say, this was a theme that I developed in 1968 in that one book. I've never referred to it again and in fact there is nothing about Jews in my last five books in the past twenty years simply because I moved into larger spheres, the world order... Question: And you realised that the Jewish question is a red herring? EM: It's a red herring. The only mention of Jews as I say is that I mention that the direction of my research was guided by these three Jews, and they're the only people that I mention in the book. They were largely responsible for my writing that book. Question: Do you believe that communism is Jewish? EM: No, I covered that in my talk today. Communism had a sort of native Russian wing under Stalin and a more international Jewish wing under Trotsky, and the international Jewish wing under Trotsky pretty well took over the Republican party of the United

States in 1980 under the guise of neo-conservatism. Question: You don't believe that communism is a poison spread by Jews? EM: No indeed. Even though Karl Marx was Jewish, Trotsky was Jewish and so forth. They say Lenin was a Jew... [Marx may have been descended from the rabbinate, but his credentials as an anti-Semitic propagandist are a matter of record though largely (and pragmatically) forgotten today.] Question: No. (51) EM: But I don't consider that a particularly Jewish operation. Question: You do realise that the two outstanding intellectual opponents of communism this century were both Jews: Ayn Rand and Ludwig von Mises? (52) EM: Oh, well, I would say that Ayn Rand was not so much anti-communist as a native American conservative who believed in the free market system. [Ayn Rand was actually born in Russia.] Question: Do you believe in the Jewish world conspiracy or the world Zionist conspiracy? EM: Well, there definitely is a worldwide Zionist movement which is conspiratorial and which manifests itself in many ways through the depredations of Mossad and the AntiDefamation League, [the latter of] which I come into personal contact with quite frequently. Most of the attacks on me here in England have come through the AntiDefamation League; that is an international organisation, so that certainly would be an international Zionist conspiracy because I have never been in England, my books have never been circulated over here, and suddenly when I come here, there are these virulent articles that I am a sinister lunatic and so forth, which of course is prejudgment... (53) Question: Okay, I won't push you on the authorship of Israel Cohen's Program and The Rabbi's Speech, but do you believe they are genuine? EM: They were certainly brought to me under good auspices. Question: By whom? EM: By someone who came to me through the embassy... [He pretended that he couldn't remember.] Question: You do accept that there is a tremendous amount of anti-Jewish fabrication circulated by anti-Semitic groups? EM: Strangely enough I find that there's practically no anti-Semitic provocation in the United States at the present time. Almost all the old anti-Semitic newspapers have disappeared: Women's Voice, Common Sense and so forth. I don't consider Willis Carto's Spotlight an anti-Semitic publication. [Possibly he misheard fabrication for provocation.] Question: No, but the Protocols of Zion is still in circulation; surely you don't believe that to be true? EM: The Protocols of Zion were proven before a court in Berne, Switzerland, to be a forgery. And a forgery is an unauthorised copy of something which does exist. If you sign my name, that does not mean that my name doesn't exist, it means that you've forged my [signature]. So from that standpoint, that they've been officially, legally found as a forgery, I would have to say that there is some basis for them somewhere.

[This is the sort of specious argument which the more "sophisticated" anti-Semitic propagandists use. It is nothing more than a semantic fallacy because the word "forgery" when used in this sense clearly refers to a fabrication.] Question: Have you read Herman Bernstein's refutation? (54) EM: No, I haven't. Question: Bernstein traces the Protocols to Maurice Joly's Dialogues In Hell, and proves conclusively that they are a plagiarism of this work. EM: Joly, yes, I've heard of that, but I haven't gone into it that deeply. Question: Do you accept that the Protocols were used to incite hatred against the Jewish people? EM: By the secret police? Question: By organised Jew-haters. By the fellow travellers of Henry Ford, and by antiSemitic propagandists to this day. EM: Henry Ford believed them to be true, and Henry Ford was not a dummy by any means. Question: I don't doubt that, but we can all be wrong. We've just seen a university graduate in there telling us that the Nazis flew to Mars at the end of the War and that they had a secret military base on Antarctica. So you don't have to be a fool to believe rubbish. EM: No, that's true. I think too people always look for melodrama, and perhaps the Protocols were a bit of melodrama which excited Henry Ford's interest. Hitler had Ford's photograph on his desk. Question: By organised Jew-haters. By the fellow travellers of Henry Ford, and by antiSemitic propagandists to this day. EM: Henry Ford believed them to be true, and Henry Ford was not a dummy by any means. Question: I don't doubt that, but we can all be wrong. We've just seen a university graduate in there telling us that the Nazis flew to Mars at the end of the War and that they had a secret military base on Antarctica. So you don't have to be a fool to believe rubbish. EM: No, that's true. I think too people always look for melodrama, and perhaps the Protocols were a bit of melodrama which excited Henry Ford's interest. Hitler had Ford's photograph on his desk. Question: Yes, he did. Now can we talk a bit about the real conspiracy? EM: Sure. Question: The Federal Reserve conspiracy is a reality. The Fed is a private banking institution, it's run for profit for a small clique of international financiers, there's no doubt about that. How can we get rid of the Fed? EM: In my book The World Order, in the last chapter, I point out very decisively that all of these operations: pitting Christians against Jews, and various nationalities against each other, are manipulated by the World Order in order to maintain their control. Question: I'll tell you something: there are two factions of the so-called anti-fascist movement in this country. The pro-Zionist faction is led by a man named Gable, who claims to be Jewish. He is of Jewish origin, and he is a proven agent of MI5. It did occur to me sometime ago that anti-Semites aren't the only people who noticed that there are a lot of Jews involved in the communist movement, and people like Gable are deliberately selected, as a red herring. (55) EM: There again that's now ancient history, the number of Jews who were involved in communism. Of the first commissars in Soviet Russia, I think three hundred and twenty

were Jews or something like that. As I say, that has now become irrelevant, but I do think that people were acting on a valid premise. Congressman John Rankin of Mississippi stood up on the floor of Congress in 1940 and said that 96% of American communists are Jews. And no one challenged him, and no one's ever challenged him to this day. That's a pretty high figure but there again J. Edgar Hoover probably gave him that figure. J. Edgar Hoover was always in the background feeding information but never taking a stand himself. [This is the same J. Edgar Hoover whom Mullins would have us believe allowed Marxist Jews to run the FBI!] Question: When you talk about Jews here though you're talking about racial Jews as opposed to religious Jews. Have you ever seen a communist wearing a skull cap? EM: No, I haven't, but [regarding] the racial/religious division, you will find that quite often Jewish people will overlook that and ally themselves very quickly against any threat to Jewish people. They do generally overlook their differences to defend themselves against a common enemy. Anyone who they think is anti-Jewish. Question: Anyone they don't like, in other words? EM: Anyone they don't like, or consider as a threat. Question: Another "anti-Semitic myth" is that of Jewish media control, yet at one time, every studio in Hollywood was owned by Jews. That's a fact, isn't it? [It is indeed a well-documented, indisputable fact, one which is always met with specious charges of "anti-Semitism". See for example, The Jewish Image in American Film (Appendix A) or the embarrassingly titled: An Empire of their Own. (56)] EM: Very much so. Not only were they owned by Jews, but they were financed by Jewish bankers in New York, principally Kuhn Loeb and Lehman Brothers [who] up till 1940 pretty much controlled the purse strings of every movie produced in Hollywood. That's a matter of record. So, the Jewish producers in Hollywood were answerable to the Jewish bankers in New York. Question: There is though a fallacy here. [And one that is by no means obvious.] This is that because a lot of Jews work in the media, that they all control it, and that because a lot of Jews are rich, they all are. (10) EM: Most of the Jews that I've met are not rich. The rich Jews don't associate with me, but most of the Jewish people that I have met throughout my career have been of very modest means. Question: Antony Sutton, you're familiar with his work? EM: Very much so, yes. Question: He cited your work in Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, and appears to have come to the reluctant conclusion that there is a [world] conspiracy. [No, he didn't cite Mullins' work in this book; this was my mistake! What he does do in Chapter Twelve, Conclusions, is to pose the question: Is the United States Ruled by a Dictatorial Elite? He then compares the consistency of the theses of five Revisionist authors including Gary Allen, (None Dare Call It Conspiracy) and Carroll Quigley, (Tragedy and Hope). He does though list Mullins' The Federal Reserve Conspiracy in the bibliography to his own 1977 monograph, The War on Gold. (57)]

EM: A Jewish conspiracy? Question: A conspiracy. EM: I know Tony quite well, and Tony himself never touched the Jewish question with the tip of a pole, and in fact in none of his books or his lectures will he discuss this situation. Question: In Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution he makes it clear that it was Gentile interests that financed Trotsky and co. (58) EM: Yes, very much so. Euestion: And that the whole Jewish conspiracy thing was put up as a red herring. EM: Yes, you see, the first recognition of the Bolshevik regime by the rest of the world: England and America in particular, it was all Jewish, so it was quite easy to draw the inference that the communists were Jewish because they did not know who the backers were. Question: In other words it was raceless capital? EM: I make all this clear in The World Order, that they're constantly manipulating all the forces in the world against each other in any way that they can. If they can get Jews fighting each other or Jews fighting Christians, that's fine, that's what they want. Question: Conflict management? EM: Yes. Question: In The Most Secret Science, Archibald Roberts lists eight banks which own the Fed, seven of which have Jewish names. (59) What are they doing to get rid of the Fed? EM: Nothing. Absolutely nothing. There's no movement at all. Roberts got some of the legislatures to [table] resolutions, that's over a twenty year period, and he's pretty much inactive at the present time. As far as I know, nothing is being done. As far as I know, Carto is sponsoring bills in Congress to audit the Fed, which I don't see will have any effect one way or the other. It might even give them legitimacy, putting them under official government audit, which will make the people believe that they are indeed official government institutions. Question: How much is the US National Debt? EM: Four trillion dollars. Question: So who owns that debt? EM: Japan owns one third of it. Question: When you say Japan, what do you mean? EM: The Japanese bankers. Question: What would happen if this debt were to be annulled overnight? EM: I don't think this would have any effect at all. The repudiation of debt simply means that it continues to be rolled over or amortised by other means. There is never a total repudiation. Question: Why not? Surely that would be possible. EM: Total repudiation would mean that all of the paper would become worthless immediately, and this is never the case. It continues to be traded, it's scaled down, that's what happens. Question: The point is that we've been fed this idea by the enemies of freedom that money has to come into circulation as debt. EM: Yes, that's the old Babylonian system, five thousand years old. Question: If the debt were to be completed repudiated, you'd have debt-free dollars. EM: Definitely. Question: Under the current system, if the government wants say a billion dollars, it goes to the bankers who float a bond and the money is created as a debt to the bankers. EM: Yes, that's right.

Question: But all the government has to do is issue its own notes [or credit]. EM: Oh definitely, the Constitution Article 1, Section 8, provides for that - Congress shall have the right to issue money. The Founding Fathers thought they were giving us debt-free money, but the banks were issuing national bank notes, which were interestbearing notes. Then Lincoln issued the greenbacks, which were non-interest bearing notes. He was assassinated. John F. Kennedy issued non-interest bearing notes, and he was assassinated. Question: Kennedy actually did issue non-interest bearing bank notes? EM: Yes, I've seen them, they're all around. Kennedy issued US Treasury notes. Question: You believe this was the reason he was assassinated? EM: The movie JFK and L. Fletcher Prouty, whose book the movie is based on, Fletcher is very intimately connected with the military-industrial complex, and he felt that the trigger was Kennedy's resolve to pull out of Vietnam because there was no point in it, [the Vietnam War]. Outside of the military-industrial complex wanting it, nobody else wanted it. So they simply killed him. It's more likely that he was killed over Vietnam than over the Federal Reserve, but it certainly could have been both. Question: Who do you think killed him? EM: Definitely the CIA and the Mafia working together. Question: The CIA and the Mafia working together? EM: Mark Lane has been on national television many times in the States and has said baldly that the CIA killed Kennedy, and no one's ever really refuted that. (60) Question: Do you believe in the "Holocaust"? EM: I think the "Holocaust" probably was exaggerated, the number of casualties. In fact now they've scaled down the number of [Jews allegedly killed in Auschwitz] from four million to one [million]. Question: One and a half million? EM: One and a half. Question: Do you believe in the gas chambers? EM: All the evidence that I've seen and the new evidence that's coming out now [indicates] that the gas chambers were built after the War. The Simon Wiesenthal Centre of course continues to promote the old hard line....My brother actually went to Dachau concentration camp...two years ago; he brought back a photograph on the wall, a big photograph saying THESE GAS CHAMBERS WERE NEVER USED AS GAS CHAMBERS. That's what the tourists see when they go to Dachau, that there were no gas chambers used to exterminate people, and so when you have all these things, then I certainly think you have to take a hard look at all these claims which are quite fantastic and say let's look into it further. [Simon Wiesenthal is, of course, the famous "Nazi hunter". For a slightly more objective view of Wiesenthal, the reader is referred to pages 120-2 of The Journal of Historical Review, Volume Five, Number, One, 1984. (61)] Question: While we're still on the subject of the Jews, did you write a pamphlet called Jewish TV: Sick, Sick, Sick!? EM: I may have, I don't know, as I said, I was doing a lot of pamphleteering. I used to turn out those things in a few minutes, and it's quite possible I did, but then again you'll find that this was thirty or forty years old.

[Mullins adopted this apologetic attitude every time he was questioned about his antiSemitica. Does this signify remorse, perhaps?] Question: There was no orchestrated campaign to keep you out of the country. Mike Whine of the Board of Deputies of British Jews was quoted in Time Out magazine; he said your ideas are so mad they're laughable. Normally they try to keep people [like you] out. They kept Zündel out, for example. EM: Zündel they considered a more direct threat because he's a German, so he's going back and forth between Germany and Canada, but by my position in the States, having no affiliation with any political party or any large movement, I don't think they're [too concerned]. Question: How can we get rid of the Fed and the Bank of England? EM: The Bank of England is supposed to be nationalised, so it belongs to the people. You can't do anything about the Bank of England. Question: We've got a National Debt as well. EM: Of course, whenever you have a Central Bank you'll have a National Debt; that's what a Central Bank's created for. When the Bank of England started operation in 1694, you started to have a National Debt soon after that, and then there was war finance, they financed wars and built up a healthy debt to the Bank, and you've been [struggling] under that load ever since. Question: The point though is that the debt is owned by the bankers, isn't it? EM: Oh definitely, always, because people have no ownership of the debt. In the States, a widow can buy a T bill for ten thousand dollars, and you can say that she's a part owner of the debt, but actually what she has is a banking instrument, a negotiable instrument of the bankers themselves. It's worth ten thousand dollars only in law as the bankers agree that it can be paid. Question: Could we form pressure groups to get rid of the Fed? EM: That's a start, you want pressure groups. Question: We could get rid of the debt if we tried. Politicians don't seem to understand it, they don't even seem to realise it exists. You might just as well be talking about flying saucers on Mars. EM: The politicians are practical...All their funding comes from bankers. You have wealthy people who give ten thousand or a hundred thousand dollars to politicians, but by and large their funds come through the banks one way or another. As long as that situation exists, the politicians are not going to take up [this issue] in any serious way. Question: You didn't mention the role of the Bilderberg Group or the Trilateral Commission in your speech. EM: The Trilaterals are simply another instrument of the World Order of the bankers. You have the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs...these think tanks. These think tanks exist solely to present palatable programmes to the people of what the bankers want to accomplish. Naturally they can't say "We want to do this for ourselves", so they present them as programmes to improve the infrastructure, to improve education and to borrow more billions of dollars from the bankers to achieve these goals, and most people fall for it. Question: One last word on anti-Semitism. If we get rid of the anti-Semitic element, can we reform the financial system for everybody's benefit? EM: In the States there's actually very little anti-Semitism anywhere because it's been made totally unfashionable by the bankers themselves. Anyone who criticises Jews [they say] wants another "Holocaust". Question: The point is that anyone who criticises the bankers is implied to be criticising

Jews. EM: Not in the States. Eustace Mullins, thank you very much. This was the end of our interview. Later, I introduced Mr Mullins to Lady Birdwood. Lady Birdwood, this is Mr Eustace Mullins, the author of The Rabbi's Speech: I said. No, he discovered it, she said. It's a complete fraud, isn't it, Mr Mullins? There never was a Rabbi Rabinovich. At this point, a certain geriatric interjected that he'd always maintained that The Rabbi's Speech was a fraud. This was the person who had nearly been ejected from the meeting for standing up during Vladimir Terziski's presentation and lambasting him for calling the Nazis Satanic. You're a dirty liar! Why don't name the real culprits? The international Jews! And here he was in his Dalek-like staccato, denouncing The Rabbi's Speech. "The whole thing is absolute rubbish!" Is this the "selective anti-Semitism" that Henry Ford was supposed to have practised? "I'm absolutely against that; communism and Zionism are not identical forces...they might on certain levels cooperate, but they're aetiologically totally disparate." The reality is that a lot of people who are in no sense of the word anti-Semitic, believe in the world Jewish conspiracy or the Zionist world conspiracy, for there is good prima facie evidence for it. In the United States if not in Britain, Jews can in some sense be said to control the media, and they have certainly had pretty much their own way with regard to US foreign policy over the past four and a half decades. This though has been more of a partnership between the Israelis and the fascists who have hijacked the State Department, than overt Zionist manipulation. (62) Then there is the embarrassing plethora of Jewish names associated with banking, big business and the mysterious quasi-secret power elites which somehow never get a mention in the mainstream press, a press which is fiercely proud of its independence, remember? However, on closer examination, the Jewish/Zionist conspiracy does not hold water, although there is certainly dirty work afoot here. We conclude this section with the rest of the Mary Seal/Keith Mears interview. As already stated, Seal was less than happy with the Guardian. Had she been libelled? No, but "There wasn't one word they printed which was true." !!! Fabricated everything she said; so what's that if not libel? Question: Do you know about Mr Mullins' background? Mary Seal: Yes. Question: Do you know about the anti-Jewish publications he's done: Jews Mass Poison American Children? MS: Yes. Question: You know all about that? MS: Yes. Question: Are you happy with that? MS: No.

Question: Was pressure put on you to stop him coming? MS: No, no, there was no pressure at all put on me to stop him coming. Question: Do you think he's an anti-Semite, now? MS: No, he's not now...I'm not saying he definitely was, I think he took that road many years ago because obviously of his research [sic] he found out certain facts, but now if you read his book you'll realise he's not anti-Semitic. Question: He did fabricate The Rabbi's Speech and the Israel Cohen quote to start with. MS: I don't know about that; he's suing the people who said that: the Anti-Defamation League. [So he says.] Question: Back in the 1950s, that's well established, that was the [real] reason he was sacked by the Library of Congress. Keith Mears: I would like to say regarding Eustace Mullins, if he's gone down one road, and he's found that it's the wrong road, he's done the right thing...I was involved with religion for twelve years; you can't condemn me for my beliefs then, and the fact of the matter is now we're not working on beliefs, because everybody who works on a belief system is led up the wrong path. So the only way to identify which is right and which is to look at the evidence... Question: Dr Strecker's presentation was probably the most controversial; the line he took was that it [AIDS] has been deliberately manufactured. From what I've read recently I certainly think it's possible that AIDS was developed in the laboratory by accident... MS: Why is it that Third World nations have got the highest incidence of AIDS? Why is it that eighty percent of the black belt of Africa is involved? [Keith Mears claimed at this point that Strecker had in his possession documents that proved that AIDS had been made to order.] MS: The virus was requested, and there was money allocated to develop it. Question: A couple of months ago, the Libertarian Alliance held a conference on AIDS Dissenting Voices - in which it was claimed with fairly impressive medical evidence that the spread of AIDS in the West has been almost purely amongst homosexuals, and in Africa, places like Uganda, it has spread purely because of the war-like conditions. MS: You see the point in all of this is that nobody is saying: believe us. All we are saying to you is we are presenting facts which we have researched personally. It's up to you to make sense out of those facts. Check them out. There are lots of things that can't be proven...All we are doing is providing people's own research, documents to back certain of those contentions, point out certain anomalies which exist in the way our economy is, the way governments are manipulated by the international banking system, so on and so forth. Facts that anybody can check out.

Back To Cover Back To Update And Acknowledgments To Conclusion And Afterword To Appendix A: Bibliography To Appendix B

To Appendix C To Notes And References Back To Baron Pamphlets Index Back To Site Index

Conclusion, And Afterword On Eustace Mullins
I am inclined, albeit reluctantly, to agree with Seal's and Mears' comment on Mullins' having "gone down that road" in the past but having changed his mind. If only for the reason that I myself once nearly went down that road! The reason is not hard to find, as I've already pointed out, there is very strong prima facie evidence for the mendacity of Zion, but the idea that the Jew is the root of all evil or that communism is a Jewish movement for world domination or that there is a massive international Jewish conspiracy, is quite preposterous. (63) Mullins' claim that the ADL is an arm of the Zionist conspiracy is not supported by any facts. The ADL is not a secret organisation, although it is most definitely a powerful pressure group which does at times resort to dirty tricks to smear "anti-Semites", ie anyone some Jew somewhere doesn't like. (64) Whether or not it acts as an unregistered agent of the Israeli government in the United States remains to be seen. It cannot be claimed that either Organised Jewry or the New World Order are in any meaningful sense, conspiracies. A conspiracy is, by definition, secret, as are its aims, and neither of these entities are conspiracies. Indeed, they are not so much open as brazen about their real agendas, the only qualification being that they use a particular kind of newspeak. Thus, when Organised Jewry talk about fighting racism, anti-Semitism, fascism...what they really mean is taking away your civil liberties, passing stronger and stronger laws against "incitement", the promotion of multi-racialism, of coercion, of collectivism. When the Trilateral Commissioners talk about "sharing international responsibilities", what they really mean is world government. When they talk about global redistribution of wealth, what they mean is redistributing your wealth in order to prop up their corrupt system of debt servicing. Returning to Eustace Mullins, the question I first asked was: Is he an anti-Semitic propagandist or an iconoclast? I believe that question has now been satisfactorily answered. He is a bit of both. To be perfectly honest, one does not form the impression that he is an out and out Jew-hater, rather that, although he still can't quite get away from the fallacy of a uniquely Jewish evil, he has realised that the "Jewish conspiracy" like the "communist conspiracy", is a branch of a much bigger conspiracy. If indeed he is sincere, if he has "gone down that road" but treads it no longer, he should at least have the intestinal fortitude to admit that he was wrong, and that he fabricated antiSemitic poison, ie The Rabbi's Speech and A Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century, in order to bolster his sincere if erroneous beliefs.

One of the biggest obstacles to reforming the financial system is the Jewish world conspiracy and all the nonsense which accompanies it. This is something I've noticed particularly with regard to the conspiracy literature concerning the "International Bankers". Gary Allen makes this point in his runaway bestseller None Dare Call It Conspiracy, indeed, Allen's book has itself been smeared as anti-Semitica (see Appendix A), and this book is about as fawningly philo-Semitic as any book could be without churning one's stomach. An even more impressive example of smearmongering can be found in Patterns of Prejudice, the theoretical journal of the Institute of Jewish Affairs, for NovemberDecember 1978; the powers of darkness: conspiracy belief and political strategy, by Richard C. Thurlow, claims the secret world government of the Jews has been replaced by the Royal Institute for International Affairs [sic], the CFR and the Bilderbergers and that Antony Sutton "has developed a Protocols-style argument, complete with massive documentation..." The idea that massive documentation is evidence against an hypothesis is a novel idea to say the least. The same intellectual dishonesty (some would say prostitution) is regularly used against Holocaust Revisionists. No real attempt is made to refute the argument. By the same token, any reference to the mechanism of credit creation - ex nihilo as an interest-bearing debt - is routinely consigned to the realm of the lunatic anti-Semites by the simple technique of guilt by association. The same shoddy technique could be used to smear anti-vivisectionists by virtue of the fact that Adolf Hitler was vehemently opposed to cruelty to animals. Major Douglas, Arthur Kitson, and all those other would-be financial reformers whose writings have been consigned to the memory hole, are the hope of the world. Eustace Clarence Mullins is, in many ways, its tragedy. He has pioneered the investigation of the Federal Reserve, and has inspired a generation of conspiracy theorists, the likes of Gary Allen, W. Cleon Skousen, and, albeit reluctantly, Antony C. Sutton. If there is to be any end to the current financial chaos: cycles of boom and bust, wars, depressions, and the continued, progressive centralisation of power under the smokescreen of building a New World Order, it lies in the Social Credit philosophy of Major Douglas and the liberation of the banking system from the shackles of usury and debt-bondage. If Eustace Mullins has the courage to renounce and denounce his youthful folly, then he may yet inspire a future generation of financial reformers, and, instead of going down in history as an anti-Jewish fabricator and crank, he may instead be ranked alongside Douglas, and that other great financial reformer Abraham Lincoln, as a true friend of liberty.

Back To Cover Back To Update And Acknowledgments Back To Text To Appendix A: Bibliography To Appendix B To Appendix C To Notes And References

Back To Baron Pamphlets Index Back To Site Index

Appendix A: Selected Bibliography Of Conspiriology And Related Literature
The page counts of the publications given here may vary. Generally I go by the number at the bottom of the page, but many books have preliminary sections: Foreword, Preface, etc, which are numbered i, ii, iii, iv...before the pagination proper begins 1, 2, 3, 4...Some also have unnumbered pages at the back, or pages which, while numbered, do not form part of the book proper, advertisements, etc. I have taken some of the paginations from other bibliographical records, in particular from the British Library on-line catalogue. AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origins of the AIDS Epidemic, by Alan Cantwell Jr., M.D., published by Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, Third printing, (January 1992). 239 pages. Index. First printing January 1988. A book about AIDS which covers the conspiracy theory. It claims that the reason this disease is so prevalent in homosexuals is because it was deliberately injected into them. There are variations on this theory: some claim that a secret agency of the American government developed AIDS as a biological weapon to wipe out Afro-Americans by the year 2000! (See also Appendix B: Jews Mass Poison American Children). Naturally, one must feel sorry for all the innocent blacks, and others, who have contracted this terrible disease through normal sex, through sharing infected needles or, most tragically, through blood transfusions. But anyone who makes the most cursory study of homosexuality and its practitioners can't help but wonder why any conspiracy theory should be necessary to postulate the spread of a modern day plague through this reservoir of filth. ANTISEMITIC PROPAGANDA: An Annotated Bibliography and Research Guide, by Robert Singerman, published by Garland, New York, (1982). 448 pages. Index. Even bearing in mind that Organised Jewry uses a very broad definition of antiSemitism - anyone they don't like - this weighty tome contains a library of appalling anti-Semitica. Nevertheless, it is an excellent reference work for serious conspiriologists which may help them sort the wheat from the chaff. ARCHITECTS OF CONSPIRACY: An Intriguing History, by William P. Hoar, published by Western Islands, Boston, Mass, (1984). 361 pages. Index. This builds on other books by like-minded authors and presents a similar interpretation of world events. A very thorough book.

THE ASSASSINATION OF JOHN F. KENNEDY: A COMPREHENSIVE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL BIBLIOGRAPHY, 1963-79, Compiled by DeLloyd J. Guth and David R. Wrone, published by Greenwood Press, Westport, Ct, (1980). 442 pages. Index. This was certainly comprehensive when it was published, but this is a subject on which the literature is still growing year by year, quantitatively at any rate. Page viii "We wish to lift the subject out of a quagmire of often bizarre speculations, official disinformation, and exploitation by the likes of Mark Lane." And, "We agree with those who will see 'rubbish' in many entries, with some of it written by the crass or the crazy." Attempted Murder: The State Reactionary Plot Against The National Front, published by N.T. Press, Norwich, (1986). 69 pages. Author(s) uncredited, Introduction by Nick Griffin. This is a document written with bitterness and vituperation by one faction of the warring Front against the other. Ian Anderson is said to be in the pay of the British Secret State and Steve Brady to be leaking documents to Searchlight. THE BANKERS' CONSPIRACY! WHICH STARTED THE WORLD CRISIS, by Arthur Kitson, President of the "National Money Service", published by Elliot Stock, London, (1933). 102 pages. No index. Kitson was a contemporary of the great Major Douglas and had similar ideas about financial reform. He also did the world a great disservice by introducing Arnold Leese to the Britons Publishing Company. This is basically a book advocating financial reform. Unfortunately, it also authenticates the Protocols of Zion. The Best Enemy Money Can Buy, by Antony C. Sutton, Foreword by Gary North, Ph.D., published by Liberty House Press, Billings, Montana, (1986). 261 pages. Index. An update of National Suicide and the activities of the deaf mute blind men. Cheats At Work: An Anthropology of Workplace Crime, by Gerald Mars, Unwin Paperbacks, London, (1983). 242 pages. Index. "Once in a decade a book appears that transforms our view of the world and our place within it. This is such a book." * This is a bold claim to make of any book. For once, it is an understatement. This is a book which does not deal with conspiracy theories in the accepted sense, but its relevance to this publication and its importance in understanding how real, "open conspiracies" work, and how people think, can hardly be overstated. Gerald Mars is an anthropologist. In this seminal study he looks at the unspoken conspiracy of vested interests. Here you will learn how every businessman keeps two sets of books, how dockers like wolves hunt in packs, how salesmen con their "prospects", and how every worker rationalises every fiddle, theft and con as a "perk". This is the real conspiracy at work. Before you study the Trilateral Commission, the CFR or (Heaven forbid) the Protocols of Zion, read this book. * From the introduction to this edition, page unnumbered.

Committee to Restore the Constitution Bulletin, founded by the author of The Most Secret Science. Conspiracy Digest, American conspiracy magazine. No further information known. DANGER ON THE RIGHT: The Attitudes, Personnel and Influence of the Radical Right and Extreme Conservatives, by Arnold Z. Forster & Benjamin R. Epstein, published by Random House, New York, (1964). 294 pages. Index. This book is basically a professional smear job, funded by the ADL and written by two of its staffers. Nevertheless, it does contain some excellent information on extremist politics in the US, and also the story of the Israel Cohen nonsense and how it was read into the Congressional Record! Ten years later the same comic duo published an even more paranoid book, The New Anti-Semitism, which, among other things, branded the musical Jesus Christ Superstar anti-Semitic! The trouble with the Zionists is that they have been allowed to get away with this sort of chutzpah for so long that they now sincerely believe that anyone who takes exception to anything they do is a raving Nazi. THE DEATH LOBBY: How the West Armed Iraq, by Kenneth R. Timmerman, published by Fourth Estate, London, (1992). 443 pages. Index. Shows how the Iraqi military-industrial complex was manufactured lock, stock and barrel by Western business lobbies. Not a banker or "Zionist" in sight. Disinformation, Misinformation, and the "Conspiracy" to Kill JFK Exposed, by Armand Moss, published by Archon Books, Hamden, Connecticut, (1987). 219 pages. Index. Debunks the conspiracy theories on the assassination of the President: claims the Soviets were responsible for a massive disinformation campaign, and that Mark Lane makes "hundreds of false assertions" in his statements, written and oral. Chapters on disinformation in 1963 and 1964; misinformation on Oswald's background; Oswald is revealed as a Walter Mitty character with no political connections and no great interest in communist ideology. Also explains inconsistencies in the Warren Report and how conspiracy theories have been developed, the alleged mysterious murders of witnesses, etc. Before you read anything else about the alleged conspiracy to kill JFK, read this. It could save you hours or even years of wading through garbage. The Fearful Master: A Second Look At The United Nations, by G. Edward Griffin, published by Western Islands, Belmont, Mass, (1964). 244 pages. Index. Illustrated. Excellent study of this most perfidious of one-world organisations. Shows how it is staffed by collectivists, how it subverts Western ideals and what its real agenda is. Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith, by James H. Billington, published by Temple Smith, London, (1980). 677 pages. Index. In three parts, this book is a massive tour de force of communism, socialism, Zionism...covers the occult origins of the Illuminati and much more. A book for philosophers rather than cranks.

Foreign Affairs, the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations. Published five times a year. The CFR is not the conspiracy. The real "conspiracy" is the inner council of the CFR. In recent years, this publication has been available in selected newsagents. Global Manipulators: The Bilderberg Group, The Trilateral Commission, Covert Power Groups of the West, by Robert Eringer, published by Pentacle Books, Bristol, (1980). 95 pages. Illustrated. Eringer says he does not believe in the world conspiracy, but for a professed nonbeliever he makes out one hell of a strong case. "Once safely in the White House, Carter appears to have turned his back on the...Trilateralists..." (Page 66). Eringer is candid enough to admit that without them, Carter would never have made President in the first place. A well-researched little booklet. Illustrated. A "Goy" Pries Into The "Talmud", comprising an investigation into Talmudic forgeries and an examination of the true nature of the "Torah", by Alexander Baron in collaboration with Rabbi Cohen, published by InƒoText Manuscripts, London, (1992). 59 pages. A4 format. The definitive refutation of anti-Talmudic (as opposed to anti-Semitic) fabrication. The Rabbi's assessment of Zionism is also extremely interesting. Background information on the historical origins of Talmud-baiting. Great American Ripoff: An Indictment of the Federal Reserve Board, by F.W. Maisel, published by Condido Press, San Diego, California, (1983). 159 pages. Literally an indictment. Claims the Fed became the feifdom of David Rockefeller, (page 1). Interesting chapters on inflation and the history of interest rates. Why should blue chip American corporations pay 22% for a loan in the 1980s when a second century merchant paid 8-9%? And how about this gem from page 101: Mr Patman: "How did you get the money to buy these $2 billion of government bonds?" Mr Eccles: "We created it." Mr Patman: "Out of what?" Mr Eccles: "Out of the right to create credit money." (This quote appears to have been unearthed by Mullins, by the way). No index, but selected bibliography including old conspiracy favourites, and misspelled names: Anthony Simpson (Sampson) and Eustice Mullens. The Health Conspiracy: How Doctors, The Drug Industry And The Government Undermine Our Health, by Dr Joe Collier, published by Century Hutchinson, London, (1989). 175 pages.

Wherever vested interest rears its head, one has to examine very carefully the claims of all parties. You wouldn't knowingly put a convicted thief in charge of a bank, or a child molester in charge of a nursery. So who would put a drug company stooge in charge of medical research? The title of the book is perhaps slightly more worrying than the content, in spite of the vested interests which pervade the medical profession, most doctors aren't in it solely for the money. Henry Ford and the Jews, by Albert Lee, published by Stein and Day, New York, (1980). 200 pages. Index. An excellent book which gives some background information on how the Jewish world conspiracy really took off. THE INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT, by Dan Smoot, published by Western Islands, Boston, Mass, (1977). 245 pages. Index. First published 1962. "When The Invisible Government was first published, almost no one had heard of the Council on Foreign Relations...the situation has changed in the last fifteen years...this book deserves a great deal of the credit." (Page ix). One of the very first serious studies of this subject. Details the CFR, its satellite organisations and fellow travellers, their subversion of democracy, the vast network of foundations etc. Doesn't go over the top, and claims that the CFR is most definitely not a conspiracy. An excellent book, but, one wonders, is South Africa really "a nation of white people practically encircled by millions of black savages..." ? (Page 124). Comprehensive membership list of CFR and info on the Trilateral Commission as appendices. The Iron Curtain Over America, by John Beaty, published by Wilkinson, Dallas, (1951). 267 pages. Index. Background on how Jewish and other leftist immigrants spread communism in the USA. This book has been called anti-Semitic, but although the author writes from an aggressively pro-Christian, America-first context, there is nothing in here to offend an honest man. The Jewish Image in American Film, by Lester D . Friedman, published by Citadel Press and distributed in the UK by Virgin Books, (1992). 260 pages. Index. This book is so candid it's embarrassing. Explodes the Jews in the media "myth". Journal of Historical Review. Concerned mostly with Holocaust Revisionism but also covers other aspects of censored history. Has included contributions from Jewish academics giving the lie to the smears of Searchlight ad nauseum. Lobster.

British conspiracy magazine renowned for its long footnotes. Issue 24 was published in December 1992. There are now two Lobsters following an acrimonious split between Robin Ramsay and Steve Dorril. For my money, Ramsay's magazine is the real Lobster, and, I stress, I'm not saying that because Ramsay has defended my integrity while Dorrill has smeared me as an anti-Semite. THE LONGEST HATRED: An Examination of Anti-Gentilism, by Inter-City Researchers, published by Inter-City Research Centre, London, (July, 1991). 55 pages. This publication is pure anti-Jewish hate but its publisher, Lady Birdwood, is too gullible to realise it. Israel Cohen's fake quote from the book that never was appears on page 23. I wish I could find out who wrote this garbage but Lady Jane refused point blank to tell me. The thing that makes me angry is that when you take out all the antiSemitism it makes a great deal of sense. The author has obviously done a great deal of research. It's a great pity that as well as understanding the money rip-off he authenticates the Protocols of Zion and rejects Evolution in favour of Creationism. The MJ-12 Crashed-Saucer Documents, published in the Skeptical Inquirer, (Vol XII, No 2) and The MJ-12 Papers: Part 2, published in (Vol XII, No 3), 1987-8. A two part article by Philip Klass on the faked MJ-12 Saucer Crash Documents. The Money Trick, published by the Institute of Economic Democracy, Australia, (1982). 97 pages. Excellent introduction to the money rip-off, explains credit creation etc. Available in the UK from Bloomfield Books. The Monopoly of Credit, by Major C.H. Douglas, published by Bloomfield Books, 4th Edition, (1979). 189 pages. No index. This book contains the authoritative exposition of the A+B Theorem. Be warned! Douglas is not the easiest of authors to understand. Available in the UK from Bloomfield Books. THE MOST SECRET SCIENCE, by Archibald E. Roberts, LtCol, AUS, ret, published by Betsy Ross Press, Fort Collins, Colo, (1984). 200 pages. Index. A no-punches-pulled book which includes testimony before committees and details of who owns whom. Names the guilty parties and leads the way in abolishing the corrupt system, which we can do if only enough of us follow Roberts' example and exert enough pressure on those responsible for inflicting this tyranny on all of us. Mullins' New History Of The Jews, (see Appendix B for an in-depth review of this outrageous book). MULLINS ON THE FEDERAL RESERVE, (see A Study Of The Federal Reserve). The Naked Capitalist, by W. Cleon Skousen, published by the author, Salt Lake City, 11th Printing, (1974). 144 pages. Index. Illustrated.

This book is essentially a review of Professor Quigley's startling revelations. Like NDCC, it is an excellent introduction to this difficult subject. NATIONAL SUICIDE: Military Aid to the Soviet Union, by Antony C. Sutton, published by Arlington House, New Rochelle, New York, Fourth printing, (June 1974). 283 pages. Index. First published 1973. The New Unhappy Lords, by A.K. Chesterton, published by Candour Publishing Company, Fourth Revised Edition, 2nd Printing, Hampshire, (1975). 255 pages. First published 1965. This book has been called anti-Semitic, but they would say that, wouldn't they? As usual, if three Jews are involved in a racket along with fifty Gentiles, the Jews are interpreted as the prime manipulators. However, this is a very good book, and although it is not annotated, its central theme is not easily refuted. Chesterton makes a great deal of sense on the race issue. None Dare Call It Conspiracy, by Gary Allen with Larry Abraham, published by Concord Press, Seal Beach, California, Third printing, (April, 1972). 143 pages. No index. This book is slavishly philo-Semitic but presents overall a more accurate interpretation of world events. Has a strong American bias, but that doesn't stop it as being listed by the ADL and Singerman as anti-Semitic. Proofs of a Conspiracy, by John Robison, (first published in 1797), this (listed as the 4th Edition) published by Western Islands, Boston, Mass, (1967). Said by the British Library Catalogue to be the 4th Edition. 304 pages. Interesting background material but unfortunately not worth much as a research document, ditto all books by Nesta Webster. THE PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION, Translated by Victor E. Marsden, published by British Patriot Publications, Shotton, Clwyd, (1978). 128 pages. Some editions of the Protocols are indexed, but not this one. Too silly to comment on. Searchlight, edited by Gerry (MI5 grass among other things) Gable, calls itself The International Anti-Fascist Monthly. This magazine and its parent company is controlled by "Jews" who exploit their ethnic origins to ferment anti-Semitism. The reason the British news media presents such a distorted image of Britain's "Nazis" is because Searchlight has had a near monopoly on "researching" the British extreme right since the 60s. It also wages an unremitting war against individual rights under the pretext of fighting racism, orchestrates violence against the British National Party et al, and smears anyone its controllers don't like, including genuine anti-fascists like Larry O'Hara, Chris Tame and distinguished psychologist Hans Eysenck. Mark Taha and I have been through every issue of Searchlight since 1965 and have

found literally hundreds of errors and outright lies including fake photographs. It has also in the past, unquestionably been engaged in two-way traffic with the Secret State. All this notwithstanding, Searchlight does occasionally provide some useful background information on various nasties (provided you read between the lies). SEVEN FINANCIAL CONSPIRACIES Which Have Enslaved The American People, Revised Edition :- Three Hundred Thousandth by Mrs Sarah E.V. Emery, published by D.A. Reynolds, Lansing, (1892). 112 pages. An extremely enlightening little booklet, published in support of the People's Party. The first edition was published in 1887 and 50,000 copies were said to have been distributed in 1888, (page 72). Refers to money manipulation and the dirty dealings of "Shylock", documents the National Banking Act of 1863 as a scheme for robbing the people, Lincoln's famous issue of $60,000,000 treasury notes (pages 15-6) and claims that the bankers were in virtual control of the United States since 1861 and before. Incredibly, this book is listed in Singerman's ANTISEMITIC PROPAGANDA, presumably on the strength of its: "[r]epresent[ing] the Wall Street money brokers as Shylocks whose control of the country's finances has reduced the people to an abject and heartless wage-slavery." Social Credit, by Major C.H. Douglas, published by the Institute of Economic Democracy, (Douglas Centenary Edition 1979). 215 pages. No index. First published 1924. Available in the UK from Bloomfield Books, Sudbury, Suffolk. Spearhead is edited by John Tyndall, Führer of the British National Party and is its theoretical journal. Not a particularly pleasant read, but often republishes articles from more intelligent conspiracy-oriented magazines. Also, when he isn't attempting to authenticate the Protocols or justifying the brutalisation of Californian motorist Rodney King, Tyndall does occasionally say something worthwhile. The Spotlight. A weekly newspaper published in Washington D.C. by Willis Carto's Liberty Lobby. Fearlessly exposes attempts to subvert the US Constitution etc. Has made no friends among Organised Jewry who condemn it as "anti-Semitic". But they would say that, wouldn't they? Spotlight on the Bilderbergers, compiled and published by Liberty Lobby, Washington, (c1980). 64 pages. Large format. Illustrated This is a research document giving dates of meetings, lists of participants, and asking the still unanswered question: why so much secrecy if there is nothing to hide? A STUDY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE, by Eustace Mullins, (see Appendix B for full details and brief review). TRAGEDY AND HOPE: A History of THE WORLD in Our Time, by Carroll Quigley, published by Angriff Press, Hollywood, California, 2nd printing, (1974). 1,348 pages. Index. First published by Macmillan in 1966.

An "Insider" comes clean. This is a massive book; its major fault is that it is not referenced, nevertheless, it is an important contribution to conspiriology. Having read this book pretty much cover to cover, I have concluded that the author subscribed less to the conspiracy theory of history than to the cock-up theory, his revelations about the machinations of the "insiders" and the "International Bankers" notwithstanding. Trialogue, published by the Trilateral Commission. The public can subscribe to this. Read it and see for yourself. This magazine is kept in the Official Publications Library; perhaps they know something we don't. Trilateral Observer, newsletter edited by Antony Sutton. Subject - the Trilateral Commission. Believed ceased publication. No further information known. Trilaterals Over Washington, by Antony C. Sutton and Patrick M. Wood, published by August Corporation, Scottsdale, Arizona. Volume I, 9th printing, (April, 1981); Volume II, 1st printing, (March, 1981). Meticulous two volume study of the Trilateral Commission by an established scholar. Details suppression of information, the energy hoax etc. Appendices included the membership list at 20th November, 1979 and list of Trilateral publications. The Truth About "The Protocols of Zion": A Complete Exposure, by Herman Bernstein, published by Covici Friede, New York, (1935). 408 pages. No index. This is the definitive refutation of the Jewish world conspiracy nonsense. It should be read in conjunction with Norman Cohn's Warrant For Genocide, (also listed). Other excellent books on the Protocols are the studies by Benjamin Segel, (1934); and the 1942 study by the American (Gentile) historian John Shelton Curtiss. A new edition of this book was published in 1972 with an introduction by Norman Cohn. UFOs and the Extraterrestrial Contact Movement: a bibliography, by George M. Eberhart, published by Scarecrow Press, London, (1986). Comprehensive two volume study of UFO literature. Includes visions of the Virgin Mary and skeptical books, and, of course, books on the alleged government cover-up. Volume One: Unidentified Flying Objects Volume Two: The Extraterrestrial Contact Movement Uncomfortable Questions for Comfortable Jews, by Rabbi Meir Kahane, published by Lyle Stuart, Secaucus, New Jersey, (1987). 324 pages. No index. So you think the Jews are one big happy family? Read this and you'll change your mind. Kahane reveals how the same dirty tricks which are used by Organised Jewry against "anti-Semites" (65) were used against him. Wall Street and FDR, by Antony C. Sutton, published by Arlington House, New Rochelle, N.Y., (1975). 200 pages.

"Without question Franklin D. Roosevelt, his supporters, and biographers portray FDR as a knight in shining armor wielding the sword of righteous vengeance against the robber barons..." (page 14). Scratch the surface though, and FDR turns out to be a classic case of a managed opposition. "when you probe the facts, Roosevelt was a creation of Wall Street..." (page 17). Contains valuable background information on the activities of the Warburg brothers and their role in setting up the Federal Reserve. "The Federal Reserve System is a legal private monopoly of the money supply operated for the benefit of a few under the guise of protecting and promoting the public interest", (page 94). Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, by Antony C. Sutton, published by Arlington House, New Rochelle, N.Y., (1974). 228 pages. Index. (Erroneously credited to '76 Press in the first edition of ECM). This book presents a methodical analysis of the true facts of the bankrolling of the "Russian Revolution" by Wall Street. Exonerates Jacob Schiff and places the blame firmly on the shoulders of the Gentile (and anti-Semitic) Wall Street banking house of J.P. Morgan. The hidden hand of the conspiracy which does not exist has as good as suppressed this book, and the spineless academics who are funded by foundation and grant money to agonise over the evils of anti-Semitism try to smear it as yet another update of the Protocols. * * See for example, Patterns of Prejudice, Vol 12 No 6 Nov-Dec 1978, pages 1-12 and 33, in particular page 6. (See also comment at end of Mullins interview). The article concerned is called the powers of darkness: conspiracy belief and political strategy, by Richard C. Thurlow. Thurlow is also the author of a book on so-called "Fascism" in which he acknowledges Gerry Gable as one of his sources, which is probably why so much crap is written about the extreme right in Britain by "academics". Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, by Antony C. Sutton, published by '76 Press, Seal Beach, California, (1976). 220 pages. Index. Presents a methodical analysis of how the Wall Street insiders contributed to the building of the Third Reich, which proves that, whatever their ethnic origins, they are the enemies of the Jewish people as much as they are of the rest of mankind. WARRANT FOR GENOCIDE: The myth of the Jewish world-conspiracy and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, by Norman Cohn, published by Eyre and Spottiswoode, London, (1967). 303 pages. Index. Illustrated. Reprinted in Penguin paperback, (1970). An excellent book which covers the background to the Protocols. WHO FINANCED HITLER: The Secret Funding of Hitler's Rise to Power 1919-1933, by James Pool and Suzanne Pool, published by Raven Books, London, (1979). 535 pages. Index. Illustrated. Provides an excellent analysis of the bankrolling of the Nazi Party. Complementary material to Sutton's.

Who Makes Our Money? by F.J. Irsigler, published by the author, (1980), distributed in the USA by the Noontide Press and in the UK by Historical Review Press. No index. 165 pages. Irsigler's theme is that the love of money and the men who control it is the root of all evil. There is hardly an event on the world stage in the past three hundred years he does not blame on the usurers. Would that he were wrong! The Wise Men of Foreign Affairs: A History of the Council on Foreign Relations, by Robert D. Schulzinger, published by Columbia University Press, New York, (1984). 342 pages. Index. A book written by one of the compliant and spineless academics Antony Sutton knows so well, to whitewash the machinations of this "elitist" think tank. If these men of foreign affairs are so wise, how come they didn't stop America being dragged into the Second World War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War...? Nothing just happens in politics, everything is planned. Especially wars. World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17, by G. Edward Griffin, published by American Media, Tenth Printing, (1980). First published 1974. An unusual book by a by all accounts, unusual author. Griffin's central theme is that the big boys who control the tax exempt foundations have suppressed not only Laetrile but the entire science of preventive medicine. He goes much further than this however and demonstrates how cartels have subverted the whole fabric of free enterprise by intensive lobbying and other dirty tricks.

Back To Cover Back To Update And Acknowledgments Back To Text Back To Conclusion And Afterword To Appendix B To Appendix C To Notes And References Back To Baron Pamphlets Index Back To Site Index

Appendix B: Eustace Mullins' Entries in A " NTISEMITIC PROPAGANDA: An Annotated Bibliography and

Research Guide" , by Robert Singerman, published by Garland, New York, (1982).
On page 198, Singerman lists Mullins' Abominable, Yet True - the Rabbi's speech before the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, January 12, 1952. This first appeared in Women's Voice, May 1952, and has been widely reprinted since, eg in Plans of the Synagogue of Satan, by the National Federation of Christian Laymen in 1954. (I'll bet they were Christians!) Page 271 lists The Biological Jew, (c1968), 86 pages. Published at Staunton, Virginia by Faith and Service Books, The International Institute of Jewish Studies. This "organisation" is another of Mullins' fanciful inventions. "A nasty little book..." Page 209 lists The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, published by the Christian Educational Association, Union, N.J., 2nd edition, (1954). 144 pages. Said to be about the Jewish international banks' world dictator ship plan. (66) Page 215 lists Impeach Eisenhower!, from Women's Voice, (c1955). 4 pages. Singerman's comment: "Eisenhower is a willing tool of his Jewish advisers, all of whom are international communist agents." Also on page 215 appears Jews Mass Poison American Children, June 1955, page 11. "The polio vaccine, invented by Jonas Salk, a Jew, is a poison because it contains live polio germs." My Life in Christ, published by Faith and Service Books, Staunton, Virginia, (1968). 90 pages: explains how Marxist Jews and the Mafia control the FBI and the CIA. MULLINS' NEW HISTORY OF THE JEWS, by Eustace Mullins, published by the International Institute of Jewish Studies, Staunton, Virginia, (1968). This book is "DEDICATED TO MRS. LYRL CLARK VAN HYNING who has kept the light burning for so many of us" Between the first and second editions of ECM my colleague and I obtained two of Mr Mullins' works through the inter-library loan system. When I remarked to him that Mullins' A Study of the Federal Reserve contained not a word of anti-Semitism, he replied, "He saves it all for this one."

This is quite the most appalling work of anti-Semitica that I have ever read, and that's saying something. I propose here to examine this 151 pages of pure hate in some considerable depth. According to Mullins here, the Crucifixion was cooked up by the Elders of Zion meeting in the Synagogue of Satan, (page 8). He makes the bald claim that any Gentile who is found in possession of a copy of the Talmud must be instantly killed, (page 11). This is a well-worn anti-Semitic canard; it is also rubbish, of course, but it is doubtful if, unlike the current writer, Mr Mullins has ever pried into the Talmud. The entire book contains not a single footnote, and generally repeats the stock anti-Semitic claim that Jews are parasites. Chapter 6 JEWS AND RITUAL MURDER, is particularly appalling. He gives a ghastly, ghoulish description of ritual murder on page 51, wherein he claims that on page 173 of his History and Destiny of the Jews, Josef Kastein validates the ritual murder charge. I consulted the book and needless to say this author does no such thing. Page 173 - in this edition at any rate (67) - is actually about Saul of Tarsus. Page 413 does refer briefly to ritual murder trials, but only as a form of persecution. Kastein's book does not seem unduly concerned with anti-Semitism. Also on page 51 of his work, Mr Mullins says, "There are so many thousands of wellattested examples of Jewish murder of children that we need only cite a few." As "proof" of this, he claims on page 58 that "It has been estimated by a leading police official that four thousand children disappear in the United States each year. There is no question that the majority of them are victims of Jewish ritual murder. So prevalent has the custom become in this country that Jews are able to ship large quantities of the children's blood to Israel for use in their ceremonies there." This "leading police official" is not named for the obvious reason that he does not exist, and as for Jews sending blood to Israel, that claim is absurd. The Israelis have more than enough Palestinian blood of their own, and they have never been shy about spilling it. As if Mr Mullins hadn't libelled innocent Jews enough, he goes one better and says of Jewish doctors (page 58), "It therefore behooves American parents to avoid leaving their children unguarded in the presence of a Jewish physician or placing the child in a hospital run by Jews." This was a view obviously not shared by the Nazis; a study of the Jewish Chronicle for the Nazi era reveals that Nazi Party members, including officials, regularly consulted Jewish physicians in defiance of the ban against using them. High praise indeed! On page 63, Mullins says that anti-Jewish fanatic Arnold Leese died suddenly while he was writing a book on an alleged ritual murder case, and implies that he was murdered because of this. Mr Leese was actually 77 years old when he died on January 18, 1956. His death was reported in his anti-Jewish hate sheet Gothic Ripples, (68) which was edited after his death by his fellow traveller Anthony Gittens, who would certainly have made capital out of any mysterious circumstances surrounding his predecessor's death. (69) In 1936, Leese was jailed for six months for effecting a public mischief and

conspiring to effect a public mischief by accusing the Jews of ritual murder and mixing blood with their Passover bread. (70) In 1938, he published a pamphlet on Jewish ritual murder, (71) so his views on the subject were well known to Organised Jewry, and to the general public, the latter of whom doubtless treated them with the contempt they so rightly deserved. According to Mullins' the Puritan revolution was a Jewish revolution and Cromwell was an agent of the Jews, (page 70). Not the least remarkable claim in the book is that made on pages 84-5. Stalin is said to have allowed two million Jews to die on cattle trains in Siberia "for fear that they would betray his military positions to the Germans..." Of course, Jews everywhere were rooting for Hitler, and the very first thing they would have done had they the opportunity would have been to betray Stalin to their persecutor. Does Mr Mullins realise just how absurd his claims must sound to even the uninitiated? While if Stalin did murder two million Jews, that effectively disposes of Mullins' thesis of the uniqueness of Jewish evil. On pages 88-9, he cites Kastein again, (page 323), "The Russian government regarded the activities of the village Jews as exploiting the rural population." I couldn't find this quote; page 323 actually refers to the Kahal in Poland. On page 95 he says, "The First World War had broken out on schedule, carefully planned by [Basil] Zaharoff and the other Jewish munitions tycoons." Zaharoff is said to have died a multimillionaire in the 1930s on the Riviera planning World War II! On page 104, he points out, "In the entire Communist literature, one finds not a single criticism of the Rothschilds, but many pages of fulmination against gentile bankers such as J.P. Morgan." Yes and no. Communists and socialists are (wilfully?) blind to the financial system's defects, but claims that the Jews control it lock, stock and barrel are hardly conducive to financial reform. On page 105 he claims that Alexander Kerensky was a Jew. He is not the first person to make that claim, and not the last to be wrong. Also on page 105, "Only two gentile officials were known out of 312 leading Communists in Russia." This again is rubbish; Lucien Wolf effectively disposed of this Communismis-a-Jewish-monopoly poppycock as long ago as 1920. (72) In fact, it would be more accurate to say that no authentic (Torah) Jew has ever been a communist. "Jewish" communists, of which there have been many, are men and women of Jewish birth only, and no more Jews than the majority of Britain's population are Christians. As communism is atheistical, Jews, by definition, can never be communists. On page 130, the Rothschilds are said to control the London Times, but as the Jews own 84% of America (page 123), this should come as no surprise. On page 136, he lists Hollywood mogul Darryl Zanuck as a Jew. According to author Philip French in his book, The Movie Moguls, Darryl Francis Zanuck was "Born at Wahoo, Nebraska; his Methodist father was a hotel clerk of Swiss parentage from Iowa, his mother a Nebraskan of English stock." (73) Who do you believe: French or Mullins?

On pages 139-40, he quotes the Israel Cohen Racial Programme rubbish in full and describes Israel Cohen as a "prominent Jewish writer and Communist theoretician." Adding "the Jews denied that there was a writer named Israel Cohen [but] two [wellknown] writers named Israel Cohen were found listed in Who's Who in World Jewry." It is doubtful if any Jew who knew what he was talking about would deny the existence of such a prominent figure, who was still very much alive when Mullins first set this canard going the rounds. The Israel Cohen in question was actually a well-known Zionist. He was born in 1879, educated at Jews' College, was correspondent for a number of newspapers including the Manchester Guardian (now simply the Guardian), and published a number of books. He died in 1961. On page 145, as well as corrupting medicine and psychiatry, "The Jews have also developed dangerous new drugs which induce insanity in gentiles." For once he may right, certainly there is something terribly wrong with the state of American medicine; Mr Mullins is living proof of that. On pages 147-50 he quotes what is presumably the full text of The Rabbi's Speech. It is so absurd that it makes the Protocols sound plausible by comparison. Even arch Jewhater Arnold Leese was skeptical of it. (74) Mullins says it was written originally in Yiddish and translated by Henry H. Klein. Mr Klein, who died in 1955, (75) was an American-Jewish lawyer and a fellow traveller of Mullins, so it is just possible that he was an innocent (or guilty) party to this fabrication. (76) On page 150, Mr Mullins says, "In 1958, the London Times reported the death of Rabbi Rabinovich, but made no reference to the famous speech, although it had been translated into many languages and was known in every country in Europe." Certainly the "speech" was widely known, thanks to Mullins' fellow hatemonger, Einar Aberg, (see interview). Aberg was actually an anti-Semitic propagandist in his own right and was churning out his poison immediately after the Second World War, and quite possibly during and before the War for all I know. (77) However, the current writer could find no entry in the Times Index under Rabinovich for the whole of 1958. Earlier on page 147, this "speech" is referred to as "The unchallenged transcript of a speech by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich..." Not so. Many people have challenged it, as the Israel Cohen fabrication. (78) Mullins even goes so far as to claim that his exposure of The Rabbi's Speech forced the Jews to postpone World War III. A claim which is every bit as convincing as that made by arch-liars Gerry Gable and Ray Hill that their exposure of the equally non-existent Notting Hill Carnival bomb plot averted a neo-Nazi massacre of enormous proportions. The only thing that might possibly be said in defence of this book is that it is all one ultra-sick joke; one does get the impression that Mullins doesn't take the subject matter too seriously. Indeed, this was suggested by the authors of a study of literary fraud. (1) If this is all a joke, then it is an appalling joke in even more appalling taste.

My Struggle, published in Christian Vanguard, June, July and August 1978. Autobiographical reminiscences of an anti-Jewish agitator. MULLINS ON THE FEDERAL RESERVE (title on front cover) A STUDY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE, By Eustace Clarence Mullins, published by Kasper and Horton, New York, (1952). Listed by Singerman on pages 198-9. This is an excellent book which contains not a word of anti-Semitism. It is hard to see how anyone bar the paranoid fascists who make up the Jewish establishment could brand it as such. On page 15, Mullins reveals that "Louis Brandeis led the fight against the Aldrich Plan in the Harper's Weekly with a series of articles on the Great Money Trust." As Brandeis was regarded by the "Jew-wise" of the time as one of the inner council of the Elders of Zion in America, this effectively disposes of the Fed = Jewish conspiracy nonsense. Mullins' claim on page 100 about the stockmarket crash makes more sense. Ie, that its culmination in the tremendous selling orders from October 24 into November which wiped out a hundred and sixty billion dollars worth of security values was the greatest misfortune which the United States has ever suffered. Not quite true, though, money is after all only bits of paper, or bank-created credit while World War Two killed real people, but the point should be taken. Most of what Mullins says in this book can be verified from standard works, eg the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. One doesn't have to read very far to realise just how great an influence it had on Gary Allen. The book is not referenced as such but contains a short bibliography and many quotes from committee hearings and the like, which, unlike most of the "references" in Mr Mullins' anti-Semitica, appear to be genuine. This book is a total contrast to Mullins' appalling anti-Semitica and it is a wonder that he ever produced the latter, particularly as this was written before much of his "let's-hatethe-Jews" crap.

Back To Cover Back To Update And Acknowledgments Back To Text Back To Conclusion And Afterword Back To Appendix A: Bibliography To Appendix C To Notes And References Back To Baron Pamphlets Index Back To Site Index

Appendix C: " he Rabbi's Speech" T and A " Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century" , two anti-Semitic fabrications by Eustace Mullins The Rabbi's Speech, by " abbi Rabinovitch" R
This was published in Choice, edition 20, 1990, page 1, under the heading 'RACISM' RUN RIOT. Choice is published by Lady Birdwood; I have tried several times to convince her that this "speech" is both a total fabrication and absolute nonsense but she won't have it.
On 12 January 1952 RABBI RABINOVITCH, speaking to an assembly in Budapest, Hungary said: "We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa. I CAN STATE WITH ASSURANCE THAT THE LAST GENERATION OF WHITE CHILDREN IS NOW BEING BORN. OUR CONTROL COMMISSION will, in the interests of peace and wiping out of interacial [sic] tensions, forbid the whites to mate with whites. The white woman must co-habit with members of the dark races, the white man with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing dark with white means the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We shall embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the PAX JUDAICA, and OUR RACE (JEWS) will rule undisputed over the world. OUR SUPERIOR INTELLIGENCE WILL ENABLE US TO RETAIN MASTERY OVER A WORLD OF DARK PEOPLES."

The nonsense of Rabbi Rabinovitch has also appeared in the Canadian Intelligence Service, (September 1952). Like Israel Cohen's non-existent book (see below), and the Protocols itself, it will probably still be going the rounds in the next century, and for a good many after that.

A Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century, by "srael Cohen" I .
"We must realise that our Party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By pounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the Whites, we can mould them to our program. The terms 'colonialism' and 'imperialism' must be featured in our propaganda. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the Whites, we will endeavour to instil in the Whites a guilt complex for exploiting the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sport and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to intermarry with the Whites and begin a process which will deliver America [and Britain] to our cause." This piece of nonsense, the product of Eustace Mullins' fertile but warped imagination, has turned up in a number of places, including the Congressional Record! It is claimed that this appears in a book entitled A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century, published in 1912. The author, Israel Cohen, was said to have been an "English communist". Lincoln Rockwell believed it as well as the well-meaning but gullible Lady Birdwood. (79) [See Appendix A under The Longest Hatred Although Israel Cohen did exist, there was no communist party in England at the time. The real Mr Cohen was actually a leading Zionist, journalist and author. (See Appendix B]. This fabrication was thoroughly investigated at the time, and is included here as a warning against taking conspiracy (and anti-Semitic) propaganda at face value. For extensive documentation on both the non-existent Rabbi Rabinovich and the Israel Cohen fabrication, the reader is referred to THE HOAXERS: Plain Liars, Fancy Liars, and Damned Liars, by Morris Kominsky, published by Branden Press, Boston, (1970); and to the somewhat long-winded NOT THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION! Shining A Searchlight On Three Updates Of The Infamous Jewish Master Plan: The Zunder Letter, The Israel Cohen "Racial Program For The Twentieth Century" Hoax And The Speech Of The Non-Existent Rabbi Rabinovich, by Alexander Baron, published by Anglo-Hebrew Publishing, London, (July 1994).

Back To Cover Back To Update And Acknowledgments Back To Text Back To Conclusion And Afterword Back To Appendix B To Notes And References

Back To Baron Pamphlets Index Back To Site Index

Notes And References
(1) "Mullins, it is said, has a sense of humor and doesn't take his own fabrications too seriously." - THEY NEVER SAID IT: A Book of Fake Quotes, Misquotes, and Misleading Attributions, by Paul F. Boller, Jr. and John George, published by Oxford University Press, New York, (1989), page 107. It's a pity other people do, like poor Lady Birdwood, who is convinced the Jewish religion is nothing less than a sinister, centuries old conspiracy to destroy the white race. (2) Gary Allen in his book None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Concord Press, Third printing, (April, 1972), page 10. (3) I had looked over his biography of Ezra Pound, This Difficult Individual, a copy of which is in the British Library, but in spite of Mr Mullins' fame as one of the most notorious anti-Semites of our time, none of his books are to be found in the Wiener Library. * When I visited the Jewish Chronicle Library in 1992, I asked if they had a file on him. They hadn't. * This library specialises in anti-Semitica and related studies. (4) Conspiracy theorists suspect a plot, by John Ezard, published in the Guardian, Friday, January 8 1993, page 20. "Stand by for John Major to be exposed as an all-powerful controller of the planet," said Mrs Seal. Seal denied she had ever said any such thing. (5) The Islamic Party of Britain had a stall in the foyer. (6) Mosley's son, Nicholas, wrote "During 1933 there were several cases of individual and small groups of fascist paper-sellers being set upon by Jews...two Jews out of a mob of 'about a hundred' were sent to prison for five weeks for assaulting a Blackshirt in Shaftesbury Avenue. According to the police there was no evidence that the Blackshirts at this time were indulging in such attacks." [Beyond the Pale: Sir Oswald Mosley and family 1933-1980, by Nicholas Mosley, published by Secker and Warburg, London (1983), page 28.] Mosley's biographer, historian Robert Skidelsky, * made a similar claim: On October 28th 1934 at the Albert Hall, Mosley read out a list of 64 people convicted of attacks on fascists since June; 32 were Jewish. "Spontaneous rising of the British people against Fascism!" he remarked cynically, (page 386). * Oswald Mosley, by Robert Skidelsky, Third edition published by Papermac, London, (1990). Although one could hardly expect the Anglo-Jewish establishment to sympathise with Mosley and his fellow travellers, many of whom were indeed openly anti-Semitic, there is evidence that they too were aware of what was going on. In June 1937, Neville Laski, President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, "warned against 'Jewish mushroom organisations which had sprung up...ostensibly to fight anti-semitism, but which were in reality nothing but rackets.'" ** Skidelsky, (op cit), page 538. See also Chapter 20, Who Was then the Englishman? In spite of the oft' repeated claim that Mosley himself was anti-Jewish, he always maintained that he was not, and that he had only ever attacked Jews for what they did,

not on account of their religion or race. ** Eg, the Jewish People's Council against Fascism and Anti-Semitism. (7) Time Out, January 6-13, No 1168, page 11, see feature article Cabal Together, "His views are so stupid they're laughable." said Mike Whine. (8) Philip J. Klass, a technical writer and regular contributor to the American publication Aviation Week & Space Technology, has probably done more than any man past or present to provide rational explanations for irrational stories about little green men. His book, UFO Abductions: A Dangerous Game, published by Prometheus Books, does an excellent job of rationally debunking the nonsense of "abductees" like Betty and Barney Hill, and fantasists like Whitley Strieber. (I have read this book and can heartily recommend it). Klass has also written UFOs: The Public Deceived. (9) The Guide To Non-Kosher Food Shopping: Boycott The Kosher Tax. Also on the front cover are the words UNMASKING THE SECRET KOSHER TAX. All Food Products Marked with either a U or K have paid a tax to a Jewish Religious Organization in violation of the U.S. Constitution! This nonsense is published by The Truth At Last [sic], (formerly the Thunderbolt), the newspaper of the National States Rights Party. (10) I'd recently had several experiences of the supposed Jewish fiscal mendacity and monopolising of the economy myself including being over-changed for photocopying in the Wiener Library. (11) In spite of a massive campaign of disinformation by the powerful homosexual lobby, a dispassionate examination of the epidemiological evidence suggests that AIDS is a disease (or syndrome if you will) which is unlikely to make serious inroads into the heterosexual community except through bi-sexuals and intravenous drug users, although, heaven forbid, this is serious enough). * The small amount of literature I have read on this highly emotional subject seems to indicate that, whatever its genesis, AIDS is a disease of filth. Homosexual practices, which include anal sex, "fisting", fellatio, "watersports" and "scat", and anonymous sexual encounters in bathhouses and public toilets, are hardly conducive to a healthy lifestyle. The practice of anal sex appears to be particularly harmful. The simple fact is that the human anus was not designed as a receptacle for a penis, the rectum becomes torn and scabrous, while the presence of semen breaks down the body's defences. How could anyone ever call this gay? * The tragedy of the haemophiliacs is, hopefully, no longer an issue, at least not in the Western world. (12) A documentary of this was shown on British TV in late 1992. This "experiment" has been well-documented, see in particular, Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, by James H. Jones, published by The Free Press, New York, (1981). The story broke in July 1972; it concerned 399 rural black men in Macon County, Alabama, and 201 disease-free men who acted as "controls". (13) Indeed, I have participated in such trials myself, at the now defunct Common Cold Unit at Harvard Hospital, Salisbury. (14) See Eustace Mullins interview and Appendix B. (15) The Order of the Illuminati was established in Bavaria on May 1, 1776 by Adam Weishaupt, Professor of Canon Law at the University of Ingolstadt, and four other associates. (The claim is often made that Weishaupt was a Jew; this is yet more antiSemitic nonsense). The Order of the Illuminati was secret and hierarchical, and was modelled on the Jesuits. It is to this organisation that the present roots of the world government movement are usually traced. After some of its papers fell into the hands of the Bavarian authorities, it was exposed

and broken up. In 1797, John Robison published his Proofs of a Conspiracy (see Appendix A) in which he claimed that the Order had simply gone underground. Although the idea of world government is as old as government itself, and the Illuminati theory is at best unsubstantiated, the roots of the modern world government can be traced in an unbroken line to Cecil Rhodes and the semi-secret Round Table Group whose ideals are today reflected in the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) and the Council on Foreign Relations. This is not idle speculation but well-documented fact. (See Appendix A for further details). (16) Eduard Meier is indeed a latter day George Adamski. The following information was extracted from Light Years: An Investigation Into The Extraterrestrial Experiences of Eduard Meier, by Gary Kinder, published by Viking, (1987). * Meier is a Swiss. He lost his left arm in an accident in 1965. His "contacts" began in 1975, in particular he claimed to have been in telepathic contact with aliens from the Pleiades, (page 14). In other words, he is a contemporary and countryman of notorious con-man and fantasist Erich von Däniken. A book of Meier's outrageous photographs was published under the title UFO...Contact from the Pleiades, (page 200). The more attention that was paid to his ridiculous claims the more his neurosis (or chutzpah) seems to have grown. On page 189 it is said that he travelled back in time to see Jesus! Meier's case was investigated by, among others, UFOlogist Timothy Good, who appears to have nothing better to do with his time. It is widely regarded by mainstream UFOlogists as a hoax: Meier's photos are a shade too convincing, as is some of his "evidence", which extends to audio tapes as well as photographs. "One reporter from the London publication The Unexplained, wrote that Meier's story 'has now become so bizarre that even the most gullible devotee of the extraterrestrial hypothesis ought to be feeling just the teeniest twinges of doubt.'" (page 231). Finally, it should be noted that Meier rhymes with liar! * I am most grateful to UK Skeptic and Prometheus Books distributor Mike Hutchinson for drawing this book to my attention. (17) Although he was not the first to claim to have been contacted by extraterrestrials, George Adamski, (1891-1965), was a true pioneer. In 1953, he published Flying Saucers Have Landed, which was co-authored by Desmond Leslie, an electronics expert. He followed this with two other books and a fantasy-prone jaunt across the globe. Space does not permit a detailed critique of Adamski's arrant nonsense, but it will suffice to say that he claimed to have been taken on a flight to the Moon, (which is inhabited!) and to have a message for mankind. Thus: "I am George Adamski, philosopher, student, teacher, saucer researcher." In fact, Adamski worked in a burger bar near the Mount Palomar telescope. He also took many photographs of flying saucers which are transparent fakes. (18) UFO debunker Philip Klass refutes these conclusively in a two part article (The MJ12 Crashed-Saucer Documents, and The MJ-12 Papers: Part 2), published in the Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII No. 2, Winter 1987-8 and Vol. XII No. 3, Spring 1988, respectively. Klass also identifies their authors but is too diplomatic to name them outright. (19) Flying Saucers Have Landed, [with Desmond Leslie], (1953); Inside the Space Ships, (1955); and Flying Saucers Farewell, (1961). Adamski was not so much a nut as an out and out rogue. Unfortunately, the world is full of them. If such documents as Seal claims to have in her possession do in fact exist, I would politely suggest that she is the victim of a private rather than a US Government-inspired disinformation campaign. (20) From what I've heard, that wouldn't be difficult.

(21) Even as I write these words, 15th January 1993, a report is being pushed by the media of a supposedly horrendous case of child abuse. The parents of a child which was battered to death were suspected of murder, but the Crown Prosecution Service was unable to bring a prosecution because both parties elected to observe their right to remain silent. It was mooted on LBC Radio today that because of this, the right to silence should be revoked in cases of suspected child abuse. In other words, they care about your children so much that they are prepared to destroy your civil liberties in order to protect them. How touching. (22) Wild Card, by Raymond Hawkey & Roger Bingham, published by Jonathan Cape, London, (1974). In this book, the United States is on the brink of revolution - terrorist groups: the American Indian Movement, the Ku Klux Klan, the lot, all are trying to overthrow the state. The book opens with a small nuclear bomb being exploded under the Lincoln Memorial. How are America's rulers to deal with this? Somebody has a bright idea. "We have seen...that conflict creates, in the protagonists, a profound sense of group unity, a willingness to endure deprivation and discomfort, and most important of all, a willingness to submit to a common discipline." * So, it is decided to fabricate evidence that the planet in general and the United States in particular is under attack from a technologically advanced civilisation from outer space. A UFO crash is simulated; the craft is crewed, armed with a pathogen and "crashed" in Los Angeles. The idea is that once the people of the United States and the world realise they are under attack by an alien menace, they will forget their differences, bury their hatchets and unite for the "common good". * I am quoting here from the Panther Edition, (1976), pages 73-4. (23) Stealth is a generic term applied to several programs. (24) I do not mean for one moment to belittle the work of Edward Goldsmith and his fellow travellers in the ecology (as opposed to the environmentalist) movement. We have got serious problems, but, as explained in Trashing the Planet, due to a massive and at times hysterical disinformation campaign by the environmentalist lobby and the mass media, the nature of these problems is poorly understood, and the cure is often worse than the disease. * * Trashing The Planet, by Dixy Lee Ray with Lou Guzzo, published by Regnery Gateway, Washington, (1990). (25) Eg by Gary Allen in None Dare Call It Conspiracy, and by W. Cleon Skousen in The Naked Capitalist. (See Appendix A). (26) See in particular Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, by Antony C. Sutton, published by '76 Press. (27) Confirmation of this comes from an unexpected source, the ADL, and it is truly startling. In a little known book called Danger on the Right , * two ADL staffers reveal that "...the quantity of merchandise brought in from Communist countries was less that 1 percent of what this country exported to them." ! Eleven years later, co-author Forster, in an article on the ADL in the Wiener Library Bulletin, ** complained that a US Senator had been guilty of that most heinous of crimes, anti-Semitism. "In April 1973 Senator J. William Fulbright, then chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, declared on CBS television that 'Israel controls the Senate'." Six months later, the day after the Yom Kippur attack on Israel, an interviewer suggested that this was a 'fairly serious charge'. Fulbright replied, 'The charge is a fact of life'. Forster described this as an attack! Anyone who is inclined to think the idea that "Israel controls the Senate" is "anti-

Semitic" rather than a simple, everyday fact, should read Paul Findley's They Dare To Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby. The author, an exCongressman, is someone who is in a position to know the facts. Or was, until he fell foul of the Zionists by developing the curious idea that Arabs have rights. * Page 25, Danger on the Right, by Arnold Forster & Benjamin R. Epstein, published by Random House, (1964). Although a good source of information on the extreme right in America at the time, this book was primarily a smear job put out at the time of the Goldwater campaign. ** The Anti-Defamation League, by Arnold Forster, page 55, Wiener Library Bulletin, 1975 Vol. XXVIII new series Nos. 33/34. (28) Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, page 176, (op cit). Sutton is actually quoting another writer, but the point should be taken. (29) The trouble with conspiracies is that they are secret, and, because they are generally intended to remain hidden forever, because of the fallibility of human testimony etc, it is always difficult if not impossible to get at the truth. (30) Apart from his well-documented campaign of appeasement, his grovelling to the British, and his allowing the Allies to escape at Dunkirk - a so-called "miracle" - Hitler refused to sanction the use of poison gas, which, as late as 1944, could have won him the war. By the end of 1944, the Germans had 12,000 tons of tabun nerve gas stockpiled, but in spite of repeated requests from Bormann, Goebbels and Ley, the Führer declined to use it. See page 62 of A HIGHER FORM OF KILLING: The Secret Story of Gas and Germ Warfare, by Robert Harris and Jeremy Paxman, published by Triad/Granada, (1983). (31) The famous poet, Ezra Loomis Pound, (1885-1972), was a contemporary and admirer of C.H. Douglas, (1879-1952), the founding father of Social Credit. Pound was awarded a Fellowship in Romance Languages but his nascent teaching career was cut short when he was dismissed from Wabash College for suspected moral turpitude. On visiting Europe, he met Major Douglas (in 1918) through the journal, New Age. According to one of his other biographers, the poet went through four stages of antiSemitism which were reflected in his Cantos, his epic poem(s) which he began in 1917 and which remained unfinished at his death. The Cantos became increasingly antiSemitic over the years. * Pound became an ardent Social Crediter, and in 1933 published his ABC of Economics, which was heavily influenced by the ideas of Douglas. Later, Pound met and was extremely impressed with Mussolini. Although he was not a fascist, he broadcast from Italy throughout the War, including on the evening of Pearl Harbour. After the War he was put on trial by the Allies but found insane. Pound certainly held erroneous or even fanciful ideas about Jews, as do many anti-Semites, but that does not make him a Jew-hater. * The Genealogy of Demons: Anti-Semitism, Fascism, and the Myths of Ezra Pound, by Robert Casillo, published by Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Illinois, (1988). See page 6. (32) The FBI was notorious at this time for its dirty tricks against suspected communists; during the Fifties there was an almost hysterical campaign against the supposed red menace. There was also so-called "McCarthyism", so if he does have a genuine grievance, Mullins, as a fellow traveller of the Nazis, if not an outright Nazi or fascist himself, is only one of many. (33) The British Library Catalogue entry reads, This Difficult Individual, Ezra Pound, by Eustace Clarence Mullins, published by Fleet Publishing Corporation, (1961). (American) Books In Print, 1992-3, published by R.R. Bowker, New Providence, New

Jersey, (1992), lists only two of Mullins' books: his biography of Pound, and a 1984 book, War! War! War!, foreword by Eustace Mullins, the book was actually written by Cincinnatus, presumably a pseudonym, and published by Sons of Liberty. This publisher churns out some of the most appalling anti-Semitica on the face of this planet. (34) Historical Review Press is run by Anthony Hancock, the son of one of its founders, Alan Hancock. HRP is the main distributor of explicitly anti-Semitic material in Britain. Originally it had a "Nazi" ideology, but people who claim Anthony Hancock is a Nazi do an injustice to National Socialism. It also stocks material on conspiriology, Holocaust Revisionism - a supposedly anti-Semitic subject - and various aspects of race and history. HRP has a Brighton address, but Hancock is also the owner of a printing press based at Uckfield, Sussex. Although he prints for right wing groups, this press is a purely commercial undertaking. He also does a nice sideline in queer porn, foreign banknotes and faked passports. Bloomfield Books is based in Sudbury, Suffolk, and is run by Donald Martin of the British League of Rights. Both Martin and his organisation have been called antiSemitic and fascist. From my personal observation I am of the opinion that Martin is not an anti-Semite, although he certainly believes in a world conspiracy of which Zionism is an integral plank. He is most definitely not a fascist, and is both anti-Hitler, and antitotalitarian, as are all Social Crediters. (35) Major Clifford Hugh Douglas, (1879-1952), was an engineer by profession. He applied engineering principles to the financial system, which resulted in his founding the Social Credit Movement. His main thesis is that there is a shortage of purchasing power owing to the necessity for retaining capital for investment. The creation of money as an interest-bearing debt (to the banks) is responsible for this. To overcome this problem, Douglas advocated the payment of a National Dividend, one which, as technology advances, would progressively replace the wage as the main source of purchasing power. Although his A+B theorem has never been refuted, it has been consigned to the memory hole. Douglas published a number of monographs on the subject of finance, the most notable being The Monopoly of Credit and Social Credit. Both are still in print. Arthur Kitson was a fellow traveller. His published works include The Bankers' Conspiracy! and A Scientific Solution of the Money Question. He was President of the National Money Service, and, unfortunately, a wanderer in the realm of the "Jew-wise". (36) Seven Financial Conspiracies Which Have Enslaved The American People, Revised Edition :- Three Hundred Thousandth by Mrs Sarah E.V. Emery, published by Emery & Emery, Lansing, (1892). The author, who distributed 50,000 copies of her booklet in 1888, documents the National Banking Act of 1863 as "a scheme for robbing the people". She claims also that the bankers were in virtual control of the United States since 1861 and before. (37) Although it does not have the same sort of backing as the extreme left, the extreme right is certainly well-funded from a number of mysterious sources. One of these is, unquestionably, anti-Semitic Islamic elements. William Grimstad, author of The Six Million Reconsidered and Antizion, is a paid and accredited agent of Saudi Arabia, but Mr Mullins has rich friends at home. See next question. (38) Willis Carto is the man behind Liberty Lobby, a right wing organisation which campaigns against political Zionism and other "un-American" influences. It publishes a weekly newspaper, the Spotlight, which has a massive circulation, and has taken a leading role in exposing the activities of the Trilateral Commission. Liberty Lobby is pro-gun etc, and, naturally, both Carto himself and his organisation have been called anti-Semitic and even Nazi.

(39) Stephen Spender was born in London in 1909. (40) Lady Birdwood has been called a Jew-hater, but she is really a dear old thing who doesn't hate anyone; she simply believes sincerely and passionately in the Jewish conspiracy, the Protocols of Zion, the Blood Libels, that the Jews control the media, the banks...In July 1991, she published The Longest Hatred: an Examination of AntiGentilism, by Inter-City Researchers, under her imprint, Inter-City Research Centre. (41) Joe McWilliams is listed by Forster & Epstein, (Danger on the Right, page 27, op cit) as a "notorious bigot" and [leader of?] the Christian Mobilizers. (42) Disgusting as this "theory" sounds, it is no more disgusting than some of the poison our children are indoctrinated with today, in particular, anti-racism. (43) As well as founding the National Front, Chesterton was active in both the League of Empire Loyalists and the British Union of Fascists, so he was anything but a Jewish apologist! In CANDOUR: The British Views-Letter, Vol. XXI, No. 503, September, 1970, page 180 under the title THIS MAN IS DANGEROUS, Chesterton wrote that Mullins' New History of the Jews is at first sight scholarly but full of errors. These errors include claiming that Chaim Weizmann invented a deadly poison gas during the First World War which was horse-traded for Palestine. Weizmann was director of the Naval Laboratories which did no such thing. That the Duke of Marlborough became a loyal henchman of the Jews and that Rufus Isaacs was Minister of Finance at the time of the Marconi scandal. Isaacs was Attorney-General. Of Israel Cohen's Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century, Chesterton said that Israel Cohen did exist, but was a Zionist rather than a communist. The Rabbi Rabinovich speech was a sort of post-war sequel to the Protocols, and an obvious fake. Of Cohen's non-existent Racial Programme, Chesterton wrote, "Fifteen years ago, when this falsehood was going the rounds, I made extensive enquiries at the British Museum and elsewhere, only to discover that there was no such book." Subsequently he offered a hundred pounds reward to anyone who could produce a copy of the book, but found no takers. (44) Boller and George, page 15, (op cit). The word "discharged" is used, rather than sacked. (45) This is no exaggeration; Christian Vanguard was another Jew-is-the-root-of-all-evil type paper. (46) Singerman, page 305, (op cit). This was the notorious "Ritual Murder" issue; it was so obscene that it was suppressed by Hitler himself! (47) Harold A. Covington was a leading member of the National Socialist Party of America, a Hollywood stereotype Nazi group. Klassen, it appears, is Jewish! Following a smear campaign against the (possibly non-existent) "neo-Nazi" hit squad Combat 18, Covington distributed AN OPEN LETTER TO THE BRITISH LEFT in which he claimed that "In Britain and in South Africa, Klassen's groups have been exposed in the media as police black propaganda operations for the get-go, and a group of exKlassenites here in Alabama and Georgia turned out to be a similar police sting to frame people on bogus firearms violations "While I admit I have no proof, I firmly believe Klassen to be involved in at least three homicides..." (48) Searchlight, June 1992, No 204. An overweight, bearded Covington graces the cover of the magazine, which announces, "not WANTED IN BRITAIN" ! (49) Dissent in Medicine: Nine Doctors Speak Out, (copyright 1985 by The New Medical Foundation), was published by Contemporary Books in the USA and simultaneously by Beaverbooks on Canada. It is the proceedings of a symposium. Mendelsohn's

contribution was a lecture entitled How Much Science Is There In Modern Medicine? Robert S. Mendelsohn M.D. was Chairman of the New Medical Foundation. (50) Must the Jew must be condemned even for his idealism? (51) Yes, they do! The list of people the "Jew-wise" have falsely accused of being of Jewish origin includes Engels, Stalin, Alger Hiss and Adolf Hitler! (52) This is purely a matter of personal opinion, but there can have been few people who hated any form of collectivism more than Ayn Rand. Mises' outstanding achievement was his analysis of socialism, which demonstrates just what pie-in-the-sky claptrap this Cloud Cuckooland political philosophy really is. (53) Whatever dirty tricks and smears the ADL may use against Mullins or anyone else, it is hardly a conspiracy, and their assessment of him as a sinister lunatic is not that far off the mark in view of some of the anti-Jewish poison that has spewed from the tip of his pen over the years. (54) Herman Bernstein (1876-1935), was an American diplomat, author and journalist. He founded a Yiddish newspaper, Der Tog, and was also for a time, editor of the American Hebrew. In February 1921, he published The History of a Lie, in which he demonstrated the falsehood of the Protocols; the following August, the London Times published a series of articles by Robert Graves which traced them to Dialogue aux enfers, (Dialogues in Hell), published anonymously by Maurice Joly in Brussels, (1864). In 1935, Bernstein published the definitive exposure and refutation, The Truth About "The Protocols of Zion": A Complete Exposure, Covici Friede, New York, (1935). This book (an expanded and updated version of his original work), contains, among other things, a deposition from Philip Graves and comparisons of the text of the Protocols and Dialogue aux enfers. Bernstein's book was republished in 1971 with an introduction by Norman Cohn. (55) According to an article in the "Jewish events magazine", New Moon, May 1992, Gable has never been a member of a synagogue, (page 19). An excellent and thoroughly researched article on Gable and his error-prone magazine, Searchlight, can be found in Lobster, issue 24, Our Searchlight Problem. The same issue also reprints the notorious Gable Memorandum to the Security Services in which he attempted to smear a left wing journalist as a terrorist. (56) An Empire of their Own: HOW THE JEWS INVENTED HOLLYWOOD, by Neal Gabler is published by Crown, New York, (1988). (57) Page 230, The War on Gold, by Antony C. Sutton, 5th printing, published by '76 Press, Seal Beach, California, (1977). (58) Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, (op cit). See in particular Appendix 2: The Jewish-Conspiracy Theory of the Bolshevik Revolution. (59) They are as follows: 1 Rothschild of London and Berlin 2 Lazard Brothers, Paris 3 Israel Moses Seif, Italy 4 Warburg of Hamburg and Amsterdam 5 Lehman Brothers, New York 6 Kuhn, Loeb of New York 7 Chase Manhattan 8 Goldman Sachs, New York

From page 56 of The Most Secret Science, by Archibald E. Roberts, published by Betsy Ross Press, (1984). Chase Manhattan is (Gentile) Rockefeller, but, with the possible exception of Rothschild, it is not meaningful in these days of raceless capital to call any of these banks Jewish. In John L. Lewis v United States of America, the plaintiff, who was injured by a vehicle owned and operated by a federal reserve bank, brought an action for damages. The court ruled that federal reserve banks are "independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations." Submitted March 2, 1982 Decided April 19, 1982 As amended June 24, 1982 No 80-5905 The full implications of this are discussed in The Most Secret Science. (This is from page 43). Neither is this an isolated judgment. I should mention that I had a long on-line discussion about the ownership of the Fed with an employee of Rothschild of London. He dismissed all my arguments as fantasy; he claimed also that at the time this book was written, there was no branch of Rothschild in Berlin as per the footnote. However, it is notable that he was unable to refute anything I said about credit-creation, and in the end he gave up the argument. (60) Mark Lane is a lawyer who has represented, among others, Liberty Lobby. (61) In an article entitled The Sleight-of-Hand of Simon Wiesenthal, Mark Weber and Keith Stimely claim that Wiesenthal is a proven liar and a fabricator of "Holocaust" lore. The current writer has found at least one brazenly faked photograph employed by Wiesenthal, in his autobiography, Justice not Vengeance, (translated by Ewald Osers). Even more shocking than Wiesenthal's "sleight-of-hand" though is the claim made by the ENCYCLOPEDIA of the HOLOCAUST, "...when some witnesses let their imagination run free and incorrectly claim that the DACHAU concentration camp had working gas chambers, the revisionists pounce on this discrepancy..." * This is an extraordinary thing for any scholar to say. Did the same "witnesses" who saw the non-existent gas chambers of Dachau also see the gas chambers of Auschwitz, which of course did exist? * See page 685 of Holocaust, Denial of the, in ENCYCLOPEDIA of the HOLOCAUST, Editor in Chief, Israel Gutman, published by Macmillan, New York, (1990). (62) Anyone who has any doubts about this should read Dangerous Liaison: The inside story of the US-Israeli covert relationship and the international activities it has served to conceal, by Andrew and Leslie Cockburn. The Israelis have done the dirty work for the Americans not just in the Middle East, but in black Africa and all over Central and South America. (63) It should also be added that there is a plethora of organisations from the Socialist International and the race industry to various manifestations of Organised Jewry, who have been working overtime for decades in order to make all financial reformers, white nationalists, populists and genuine anti-communists go down that road. (64) Many authors have made this claim, eg Gary Allen. (Allen accuses the ADL of being a communist front). According to a reputable Jewish source, * the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith was founded in Chicago in 1913 to campaign against anti- Jewish libels and to "establish the falsity of the charges contained in scurrilous propaganda". * It has already been established in this monograph that spokesmen for Organised

Jewry have a strange definition of the word "falsity". The other charge which is often laid against the ADL is that it is an illegal organisation because it acts as the unregistered agent of a foreign power (Israel) in the United States. ** The current writer is not sufficiently qualified to comment on this claim, but as the ADL has now been in existence for some 80 years, that does seem highly unlikely. * The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Volume 1, page 336. ** This charge has been made by the Institute for Historical Review and the Spotlight newspaper, but it should be borne in mind that the ADL was founded thirty-five years before the establishment of the State of Israel. (65) Ie anyone they don't like. (66) The Wiener Library Bulletin, Vol. X, Nos. 3-4, 1956, page 22, claims that Mullins' publication, Federal Reserve Conspiracy, was described by a contemporary German newspaper as "insane ravings about a Jewish-Communist domination of the United States, with direct incitement to Jew massacres." (67) History and Destiny of the Jews, by Josef Kastein, Translated from the German by Huntley Paterson, published by Bodley Head, London, (1933). (68) In issue 135, dated 4th February, 1956, page 1, Mrs Winifred Leese reported that as the newsletter went to press, Mr Leese had died after a short illness. Issue 136, dated 10th April, 1956 again reported his death; this issue was edited by Anthony Git tens. (69) The tone of Gothic Ripples changed little if at all with the passing of its founder. An occasional (and far less anti-Semitic) report called Gothic Ripples is still published today, by Colin Jordan, Leese's spiritual heir. (70) In a signed article, INSTINCTIVE SADISM: THE HITHER ASIATIC RACE, published in The Fascist - The Organ Of Racial Fascism, page 5. The article, which ended with a call for ALL JEWS OUT! was typical of Leese's obsessive Jewmania. "It is well established, in spite of many shameless denials, that Jews practice a ritual murder of Christians in order to obtain fresh blood to mix in their ceremonial Passover bread." As a consequence he and his printer Walter Whitehead received summonses on six counts, including seditious libel. Leese defended himself, and secured his acquittal on four counts but was convicted on the public mischief charges and gaoled in lieu of paying a fine. Leese founded and edited The Fascist from 1929-39, save for his spell in gaol when it was edited by C.F. Trueman. It would have been better for all concerned if, rather than hound the poor man like this, they had left him to his own madness, but even in the thirties the leaders of Organised Jewry had got their own way for so long by wailing, gnashing their teeth and pulling wires behind the scenes that it was inevitable that they would pressurise the government, successfully, to clamp down on him hard at some point. (71) My Irrelevant Defence being Meditations Inside Gaol and Out on Jewish Ritual Murder, by Arnold S. Leese, published by the Imperial Fascist League, London, (1938). According to Richard Thurlow, (in Fascism In Britain A History, 1918-1985), this pamphlet was actually co-written by one of Leese's fellow travellers, Charles Gore. (72) See The Jewish Bogey and the Forged Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, by Lucien Wolf, published by the Press Committee of the Jewish Board of Deputies, London, (1920). This book deals with the Jewish Peril, the Jews and Bolshevism and the Protocols of Zion. (73) Page 155, THE MOVIE MOGULS: An Informal History of the Hollywood Tycoons, by Philip French, published by Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, (1969). (74) On page 3, issue 90 of his anti-Jewish hate sheet, Gothic Ripples, (8th July, 1952), under the heading THE ANNIHILATION OF THE WHITES, Leese republished part of

this bogus speech with the cautionary note, "We publish it, not because we can vouch for its authenticity as a speech, but because it seems to us accurately to sum up the racial policy of the Jews as recognised by us over many years..." Yes and no. Certainly it says nothing about the "policy" of Torah Jews, who for the most part are still living in seventeenth century Poland and are concerned only with living "a good Jewish life" until their time on this Earth is over. On the other hand, a reading of Patterns of Prejudice or the even more obnoxious, error-prone and lie-ridden Searchlight, does indeed provide prima facie evidence of a desire by Organised Jewry to rid this planet of the wicked "Aryan" goyim. But that's another story entirely. (75) Klein's death in New York at the age of 76, was reported in Gothic Ripples, No 133, 29th November, 1955, (page 3), under the heading An Unusual Jew. (76) Henry Klein has several listings in Robert Singerman's ANTISEMITIC PROPAGANDA... as the author of pamphlets purporting to expose the machinations of the Jewish Sanhedrin. (77) The Jewish Chronicle for October 12, 1945, (page 8), reported that a publishing firm called Aberg's was supplying schoolchildren with anti-Semitic poems, one urging the clergy to wage war against the Jews. (78) The Israel Cohen fabrication is mentioned in Danger on the Right, and as already stated, A.K. Chesterton denounced it as a fabrication, (see note 43). (79) White Power, by George Lincoln Rockwell, Second Edition, (September, 1977), pages 258-9. First Edition published August, 1967. No publisher given, but presumably published by the American Nazi Party. One should not be too uncharitable to the likes of Rockwell, and certainly not to the likes of Lady Birdwood, for taking this sort of trash at face value. I actually believed it myself the first time I read it, not because it confirmed any latent anti-Semitic prejudice, but because it sounded just the sort of asinine thing that a Jewish communist would say. Anyone who has ever read Searchlight will realise exactly what I mean.

Back To Cover Back To Update And Acknowledgments Back To Text Back Conclusion And Afterword Back To Appendix A: Bibliography Back To Appendix B Back To Appendix C Back To Baron Pamphlets Index Back To Site Index




Back To Site Index

Site Index


Alexander Baron may be contacted in writing via: InƒoText Manuscripts, 93c Venner Road, Sydenham, London SE26 5HU, England or via E-mail at a_baron[AT] This site was last updated on November 18, 2011 Donate to this site:
_s-xclick -----BEGIN PKCS7-

Please sign my guestbook

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful