0 Up votes0 Down votes

83 views17 pagesA comparison between the Navier-Cauchy equation for an elastic continuum of infinite extension and Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic fields.

Jan 27, 2009

© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

PDF or read online from Scribd

A comparison between the Navier-Cauchy equation for an elastic continuum of infinite extension and Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic fields.

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

83 views

A comparison between the Navier-Cauchy equation for an elastic continuum of infinite extension and Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic fields.

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Solution 8
- Gate Design Procedure
- Report torsion new
- AWS CWEngPart1&2Brochure
- ANSYS and Cable Stayed Bridge
- artigo
- 0604-03R
- ME 2254
- Tsaiwu Failure Theory
- h 05744352
- Guided Tour
- 3D FEM Simulations of a Shape Rolling Process
- Syllabus
- me422 final report
- Strength of Materials - 2Marks
- GL_8.pdf
- AER103A Course Specifications
- Lecture 2 [Stresses] (1).pdf
- Vib Paster Dq
- Q Course for PERU PPT 2

You are on page 1of 17

OF

INFINITE EXTENTION

To Elizabeth

(1824–1907) pointed out the resemblance between elastodynamic and electro-

dynamic equations [2, page 279-280]. In this paper I will follow up some of his

thoughts in order to see exactly how far this resemblance stretches.

I will start by recapitulating some topics from the Linear Theory of Elas-

ticity in an elastic continuum of infinite extension – which I will call a spatial

continuum – and show that they can be reformulated to terms that exactly

match those applied in Electrodynamics. With the additional assumption that

there may be free moving sinks and sources in the spatial continuum, I will

show that they will behave exactly like electric charges do. Finally I will show

that if disturbance energy can be confined in small areas of the spatial con-

tinuum, the energy packets will behave in the same way as matter except for

gravitation, which goes beyond the scope of this paper.

The Linear Theory of Elasticity is a discipline in its own right, and this section

is only meant as an introduction to the topic. The theory was probably originally

intended to describe ordinary elastic bodies consisting of particles bound together

by molecular forces, but it is through the centuries refined to be a theory that can

describe deformations in a true elastic continuum. Here, I will focus on the part of

the theory that describes deformations of an elastic continuum of infinite extension

or nearly so. In its undeformed state it is supposed to be homogeneous and isotropic

if anything else isn’t stated explicitly. For a more thorough investigation I refer

to [1]. Only a couple of the equations, namely (1.7), (1.16), and (1.18) are used in

later developments so if those equations are familiar, this section may be skipped.

1.1. Displacement fields. The space B under consideration, also called a Kelvin

space, is all filled up with an elastic continuum which in its undeformed state is

homogeneous and isotropic with mass density ρs that obeys the deformation laws

of The Linear Theory of Elasticity. Notice that I already now put the index s on the

mass density in order to distinguish it from the charge density ρ of electrodynamics.

Date: 20:08:08.

Thanks to a friend who wants to be anonymous, because he has supplied me with important

books, and given me the term ”The spatial continuum”.

1

2 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN

The displacement in this space is described by the displacement field ; its value

u(x) at a point x is the infinitesimal displacement of x. The symmetric part

¡ ¢

(1.1) ² = 12 ∇u + ∇uT ,

1

²ij = 2 (u i, j + uj, i ),

of the displacement gradient, ∇u, is the infinitesimal strain field, and the above

equation, relating ² to u, is called the strain-displacement relation. In this context

the (local) space is to be understood as the whole of the deformed area, or at least

an area through which border no significant forces due to the inside deformation

are conveyed. In addition u has got to be continuous and sufficiently smooth.

We call

div u = tr ²,

the dilatation. The infinitesimal volume change δv(P ) of a part P of space due to

a continuous displacement of the field u is defined by

I

δv (P ) = u · n da,

P

where n is the unit vector normal to the surface element da of the surface of P , and

we say that u is solenoidal if δv(P ) = 0 for every P . By the divergence theorem

we have

Z Z

δv (P ) = div u dv = tr ² dv.

P P

tr ² ≡ 0, or equivalently, div u ≡ 0,

all over space. Then there exist a vector field Ψ such that

u = curl Ψ.

A deformation field is said to be irrotational if it satisfies the condition

curl u ≡ 0,

all over the field. Then there exist a scalar field φ in space such that

u = ∇φ.

Let u be a vector field where [u]∞ = 0, then Helmholtz’s theorem states that

there exist a smooth scalar field φ and a vector field Ψ on B such that

u = ∇φ + curl Ψ, where div Ψ = 0,

(see e.g. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HelmholtzsTheorem.html). In plain words

this theorem states that an arbitrary deformation field, u, can be decomposed into

two fields; an irrotational field u1 = ∇φ and an solenoidal field u2 = curl Ψ, such

that

½

u1 = grad φ, curl u1 = 0

(1.2) u = u1 + u2 , where

u2 = curl Ψ, div u2 = 0.

which implies that the superposition of u1 and u2 gives a complete description of

any local deformation field in the spatial continuum.

3

acting on a part, S, of space basically consisting of a surface force sn and a body

force b. By the same right as u can be divided in an irrotational and an solenoidal

component, so can also the body force b, making b = b1 + b2 with b1 and b2

belonging to the irrotational and solenoidal field respectively.

½

b1 = grad ϕ

(1.3) b = b1 + b2

b2 = curl A, div A = 0.

Since ϕ initially can be set to any level, it might as well be associated with a

possible uniform pressure in the continuum, so an initial uniform pressure will not

alter the equations in the least.

We assume that there all over space is a strictly positive function ρs called the

density such that the mass of any part P of space is given by

Z

ρs dv

P

u(x, t) such that

∂u ∂2u

u̇ = and ü = 2

∂t ∂ t

are the velocity and acceleration respectively. The linear momentum l of P is

Z

l(P ) = ρs u̇ dv,

P

0

and the body counterforce b caused by acceleration is

Z

0

b (P ) = −l̇(P ) = − ρs ü dv.

P

In addition to this initial body force, I will keep the possibility open that there

might be another hypothetical body force b caused by the external world, just in

order to see how such a force would change the spatial continuum. The total force

f (P ) on a part P of space is the total surface force from the stress vector sn exerted

across the surface ∂P plus the total body force exerted on P by the external world

Z Z

f (P ) = sn da + b dv.

∂P P

The Cauchy-Poisson theorem [1, page 44] states that if u is an admissible motion

and f is a system of forces, then [u, f ] is a dynamic process if and only if the

following two conditions are satisfied:

(1) there exists a symmetric tensor field σ called the stress field, such that for

each unit vector n,

σn = σ n;

(2) u, σ, and b satisfy the equation of motion

(1.4) div σ + b = ρs ü.

This theorem is one of the major results of continuum mechanics.

4 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN

relation between strain and the stress it causes, which can be expressed by the

relation

£ ¤

σ(x) = C ²(x) ,

where C is a fourth-order symmetric tensor that maps the space of strain onto the

space of stress according to

σij = Cijkl ²kl .

C is called the elasticity tensor, and since the continuum under consideration

is assumed to be homogeneous over the actual space, the 36 components of C

is independent of the position vector x. Since ² is the symmetric part of the

deformation gradient, ∇u, it may look like this relation rules out the possibility

that there might be a residual pressure in the continuum, but that is not so if ² is

interpreted as the actual stress minus the residual stress, provided that we interpret

the corresponding surface trajectory accordingly [1, footnote 1 on page 68].

The spatial continuum under consideration is not only homogeneous, but also

isotropic. This property immediately reduces the 36 components of C such that C

may be described by only two different scalar constants. The stress-strain relation

in a homogeneous and isotropic continuum thus takes the relatively simple form

(1.5) σ = 2µs ² + λs (tr²)I,

σij = 2µs ²ij + λs ²kk δij

= µs (u i, j + uj, i ) + λs uk, k δij ,

where µs and λs are Lamé’s elastic moduli 1, which are constants in a homogeneous

elastic continuum, and δij is the Kronecker delta

½

1 if i = j ,

δij =

0 if i 6= j .

1.4. The Navier-Cauchy equation. From the strain field (1.1), the Stress-strain

relation (1.5) and the Equation of motion (1.4) one can derive the Navier-Cauchy

equation [1, page 213]

µs ui, jj + µs uj,ij + (λs uk,k δij ), j + bi = ρs üi

µs ui, jj + µs uj, ji + λs uk,ki + bi = ρs üi ,

(1.6) µs ∇2 u + (λs + µs )∇divu + b = ρs ü,

or equivalently by the mathematical identity curl curl u = ∇ div u − ∇2 u

(1.7) (λs + 2µs )∇divu − µs curl curl u + b = ρs ü.

At this point it may be appropriate to stress the point that the Navier-Cauchy

equation only treats the limit where deformations can be considered infinitesimal,

and it must not be mixed up with Navier-Stokes equation, which also incorporates

viscosity and takes into account the hydrodynamic property that v̇ may be different

from ∂v/∂t [i.e. v̇ = ∂v/∂t + (v · ∇)v].

1Note that I have put on the indices s to avoid mixing them up with other properties in

electrodynamics.

5

[∇ · v]∞ = 0,

[∇ × v]∞ = 0,

(no velocities at infinite distance from considered area) may be written as the sum

of an irrotational part and a solenoidal part,

v = −∇φ + ∇ × A,

where

Z

∇·v

φ=− 0 − r|

d3 r0 ,

4π|r

ZV

∇×v 3 0

A= 0

d r,

V 4π|r − r|

(see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HelmholtzsTheorem.html).

As the spatial continuum is of infinite extension, or nearly so, any deformations

have to be confined to a finite part of space, so this theorem will be applicable on all

deformations. Hence the displacement field can be decomposed into two properties

u = u1 + u2 ,

where

u1 = −∇φ = − grad φ,

u2 = ∇ × Ψ = curl Ψ.

Since curl grad φ ≡ 0, and div curl Ψ ≡ 0, the Navier-Cauchy equation (1.7) can

be divided into two independent equations, one for an irrotational field

ρs b1

(1.8) ∇divu1 = ü1 − ,

(λs + 2µs ) λs + 2µs

and the other for a solenoidal field

ρs b2

(1.9) −curl curl u2 = ü2 − .

µs µs

By defining two new constants

s r

λs + 2µs µs

(1.10) c1 = , c2 = ,

ρs ρs

the N-C equation takes the form

b

(1.11) c12 ∇divu − c22 curl curl u + = ü.

ρs

Operating on Equation (1.7) with the div operator and on Equation (1.6) with

the curl operator yields respectively

1 ∂ 2 (div u) div b

(1.12) ∇2 (div u) − 2 2

=−

c1 ∂t λs + 2µs

1 ∂ 2 (curl u) curl b

(1.13) ∇2 (curl u) − =−

c22 ∂t2 µs

With b = 0 we have two wave equations where the dilatation, divu, satisfies

a wave moving with the speed c1 , while the rotational component curlu, satisfies

6 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN

a wave moving with the speed c2 . In fact the Propagation theorem for isotropic

bodies states that if a body is isotropic, then a wave is either longitudinal, in which

case c = c1 , or transversal, in which case c = c2 [1, page 256]. This diversion of

the Navier-Cauchy equation into one irrotational and one solenoidal part, allows

us to examine these two parts separately and thereby simplifies the strain-stress

relation immensely by reducing the elastic constants to only one single constant

(the wave speed) in each equation (c1 6= c2 ). We see from Equation (1.10) that

the two wave p speeds are related to each other with a fixed constant given by the

relation c1 = 2 + λs /µs · c2 . We notice that c1 is about the double of c2 .

Finally we notice that all information of curlu is lost in (1.12) and all information

of divu in (1.13).

1.5. Field energy and energy transport. From the Navier-Cauchy equation

one can find the internal field energy in an admissible field in B by performing the

following thought experiment: Introduce a hypothetical body force, −b (negative

because b is a breaking force), from the outside world such that it eradicates the

entire field in B; i.e. u and all functions of u become constant like zero all over

B. In addition I will assume that the entire field is confined inside B such that u

is zero on the surface of B and beyond. The energy released by this operation, E,

would then be like the total field energy in B.

Z Z0

E=− dv bdu

B f (u)

Z fZ(u)

h ¡ ¢ i

= dv ρs ü − (λs + 2µ)grad divu + µcurl curlu du

B 0

integrals is simply the kinetic energy of the system

Z ³ Zu̇

du̇ ´

E1 = dv ρs du

dt

B 0

Z ³ Zu̇ ´

= dv ρs du̇ · u̇ ,

B 0

Z

1 2

E1 = 2 ρs u̇ dv.

B

The next part can be integrated by using the mathematical identity (1.17) and

inserting φ = div u and A = du

7

Z Z u

div

h i

E2 = (λs + 2µ) dv div u · div(du) − div(du · div u)

B 0

Z Z u

div

£ ¤

= (λs + 2µ) dv div u · d(divu) −

B 0

Z Z u

div

¡ ¢

(λs + 2µ) dv · div du · divu .

B 0

The first part of the integral can readily be integrated, and the last part can

be transformed into a surface integral over ∂B by the Divergence theorem2 and

disappear because u is constant like zero on the border of B and beyond. Thus

Z

1 2

E2 = 2 (λs + 2µ)(div u) dv.

B

We can find E3 in much the same way by using the identity

(1.14) div (A × B) = curl A · B − curl B · A,

and inserting B = curl u and A = du

Z Z u

curl

h i

E3 = −µ dv div(du × curl u) − curl u · curl(du)

B 0

Z Z u

curl

B 0

Z Z u

³ curl ´

µ dv · div du × curl u .

B 0

Again the first part can be integrated and the last part disappear by the same

reason as above, and we get

Z

1 2

E3 = 2 µ(curl u) dv.

B

Finally we can write the total energy in the deformed area

Z h i

1 2 1 2 1 2

(1.15) E= ρ

2 s u̇ + 2 (λ s + 2µ)(div u) + 2 µ(curl u) dv.

B

The development may be a bit unorthodox, but the result is already known as

Kelvin’s theorem [1, page 208], and is a proven theorem in the Linear Theory of

Elasticity. The result can be interpreted as the local energy density even if this

development does not prove where in the field the energy is to be found; only

that there to a curl u and a div u always corresponds an energy given by the

2 H (A · n) df = R div A dv

∂B B

8 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN

equation above, and no other energy is present as long as we deal with infinitesimal

deformations restricted to a limited area of a homogeneous and isotropic continuum

covered by the Linear Theory of Elasticity.3 With this restriction in mind the local

energy density, e, in the spatial continuum is given by

(1.16) e= 1

2 ρs u̇2 + 1

2 (λs + 2µs )( div u)2 + 1

2 µs ( curl u)2

leaving the possibility open that there may be a residual pressure and a corre-

sponding homogeneous residual energy density in addition to this field energy. It

is noteworthy that the energy density in any field of strain and motion is nonneg-

ative even if the space itself should happen to contain a huge amount of uniformly

distributed energy due to an initial pressure.

The energy transport in the deformation field can be found by deriving the

equation above with respect on time. We acquire

∂e

= ρs u̇ü + (λs + 2µs ) div u div u̇ + µs curl u curl u̇.

∂t

We substitute ρs ü from Equation (1.7) and get

∂e £ ¤

=u̇ (λs + 2µs ) grad div u − µs curl curl u + b

∂t

+ (λs + 2µs ) div u div u̇ + µs curl u curl u̇,

∂e £ ¤

bu̇ = + µs curl ( curl u) · u̇ − curl u̇( curl u)

∂t £ ¤

− (λs + 2µs ) ( div u) div u̇ + u̇ grad ( div u) .

By the mathematical identity (1.14) and the identity

(1.17) div (φA) = φ div A + A grad φ,

this equation develops into

∂e £ ¤

+ div (µs curl u × u̇) − div (λs + 2µs ) div u · u̇ = bu̇.

∂t

We define a new vector

(1.18) S = µs curl u × u̇ − (λs + 2µs ) div u · u̇,

and in the absence of external forces we acquire the compact equation:

∂e

+ div S = 0.

∂t

Since the increase in energy density has got to be equal to the inflow of energy per

unit volume, S can be interpreted as the energy flow vector.

In this section I will redefine some of the terms used in elastodynamics to terms

that can be directly compared to those in electrodynamics. I will stress that these

redefinitions only are intended to make the comparison simpler and will not change

the physics behind the original terms in any way. With the additional assumption

that there might be true sinks and sources in the elastic continuum, I will also

show that they will influence the elastodynamic fields in exactly the same way as

electric charges influence the electromagnetic fields. How sinks and sources can be

3The corresponding expression for the energy density in an electromagnetic field has the same

limitation, but nonetheless it is usually interpreted as the local energy density.

9

more than pure mathematical entities will be discussed in another paper4. Some

terms are used quite differently in mechanics and electrodynamics. For example

the Greek letter ρ is used for mass density in mechanics, but as charge density

in electrodynamics. To avoid confusion I will use an index s on the mechanical

terms whenever necessary. Hence ρs means spatial mass density while ρ means the

density of sinks – the spatial counterpart to charge density.

new properties

def 1

(2.1) µ0 = , [L2 F −1 ] = [LT 2 M −1 ],

µs

def

(2.2) ε0 = ρs , [F T 2 L−4 ] = [M L−3 ],

def ∂u2

(2.3) E = − , [LT −1 ],

∂t

def

(2.4) B = curl u2 , [ ],

def

(2.5) j = b, [F L−3 ] = [M L−2 T −2 ],

1

(2.6) c2 = , [L2 T −2 ].

ε0 µ0

Note that in this section all the defined properties refer exclusively to elastic

properties. The notations inside the square brackets are the dimensions of the

properties in front, but in this context I have found it convenient to alternatively

replace mass with force as a fundamental unit. Hence the mass unit is converted

to the force unit by the relation

[F ] = [M LT −2 ].

By the identities curl (∂(·)/∂t) = ∂ curl (·)/∂t and div curl (·) = 0 we immedi-

ately get the relation between B and E

(2.7) curl E + Ḃ = 0,

and by the mathematical identity div curl a = 0 we have

(2.8) div B = 0.

Navier’s Equation (1.9) takes the form

1

(2.9) curl B − Ė = µ0 j.

c2

Now I will make the assumption that there may be real sinks and sources in the

spatial continuum. How this is possible will be discussed elsewhere, but here I take

entities like that for granted. I will take sinks as positive entities and sources as

negative sinks, and assume that they can only be created by pair production; one

sink for for one equally strong source. If there are more sinks than sources in an

area, the sink density is positive, and if there are more sources than sinks, then the

Puzzle.

10 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN

sink density is negative. The strength of a spatial sink, Qs , can be defined as the

inflow of spatial mass through a closed surface around the sink

I

def

Q = −ρs u̇ndf, [F T L−1 ] = [M T −1 ],

V

Now let sinks and sources with strength Q1 , Q2 , Q3 , · · · , Qn be sufficiently smoothly

distributed in space. Then the density of sinks is given by

m

def 1 X

ρ = lim Qsn

V →² V

n=1

I

1

= −ρs lim u̇ndf

V →² V V

= −ρs div u̇,

where m is the number of sinks in a volume V of space, and ² is a small volume, but

still great enough to contain many sinks. (Note the difference between the spatial

mass density ρs and the density of sinks ρ.)

There is a hidden dependency between the sink density ρ and and the volume

force j. By taking the divergence of Equation (2.9):

³ Ė ´

div curl B − div 2 = div µ0 j,

c

1

(I) − div Ė = div j,

ε0

and the partial derivative with respect on time of Equation (??):

∂ 1 ∂ρ

div E =

∂t ε0 ∂t

1 ∂ρ

(II) div Ė = ,

ε0 ∂t

and evaluating the combination I + II, we acquire

(2.10) ρ̇ + div j = 0.

Since sinks and sources by definition can only be created or disappear in pairs, the

only way the density can change in a volume is by out- or inflow, hence the vector

j can be interpreted as a flow of sinks or sources, i.e. a flow of sinks or sources will

create a force field (a drag) in the spatial continuum.

2.2. The stress energy tensor. According to (1.16) and the newly defined prop-

erties the elastodynamic field energy in a divergence-free field is

ε0 2 1 2

(2.11) e= E + B , [F L−2 ] = [M L−1 T −2 ].

2 2µ0

Since this field may contain energy, we must also expect that it can move around

in space as the field changes. To examine this property we can start by deriving

11

∂e 1

= ε0 E · Ė + B · Ḃ.

∂t µ0

From this expression we can eliminate the time derivatives of E and B by applying

(2.9) and (2.7)

∂e ³ 1 ´ 1

= ε0 E · c2 curl B − j − B · curl E,

∂t ε0 µ0

∂e 1¡ ¢

= curl B · E − curl E · B − j · E,

∂t µ0

and further by the mathematical identity (1.14) it develops into

∂e 1 ³ ´

(2.12) + div E × B = −j · E, {= u̇ · b}.

∂t µ0

The right side of this equation is the rate of work done by external forces per unit

volume on the continuum, and the left side can be interpreted as the rate of increase

in energy density plus the rate at which the energy is leaving per unit volume. Thus

the energy flow vector is

def 1

(2.13) S = (E × B), [F L−1 T −1 ] = [M T −3 ].

µ0

With this property inserted, Equation (2.12) takes the form

1 ∂e 1 1

(2.14) + div S = − j · E.

c ∂t c c

To examine the forces involved by a change of momentum, we can derive the mo-

mentum vector with respect on t and again eliminate the time derivatives of E and

B by applying (2.9) and (2.7)

Ṡ 1 ¡ ¢

= 2 E × Ḃ + Ė × B ,

c2 c µ0

Ṡ £ ¤

2

= ε0 E × (− curl E) + (c2 curl B − c2 µ0 j) × B ,

c

Ṡ 1

= −ε0 E × curl E + curl B × B + B × j.

c2 µ0

By applying the mathematical identity

we obtain

Ṡ ¡ ε0 ¢ ¡ 1 ¢

2

+ grad E · E − ε0 (E · ∇)E + grad B·B

c 2 2µ0

1

(2.16) − (B · ∇)B = (B × j).

µ0

12 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN

Ṡi ε0 1 1

2

+( E·E+ B · B),i − ε0 Ej Ei, j − Bj Bi, j

c 2 2µ0 µ0

= ²ijk Bj jk ,

and expand it by adding ±ε0 Ej,j Ei and ± µ10 Bj,j Bi

Ṡi ¡ ε0 2 1 2¢

2

+ E + B , i − ε0 Ej Ei, j − ε0 Ej, j Ei + ε0 Ej, j Ei

c 2 2µ0

1 1 1

− Bj Bi, j − Bj, j Bi + Bj, j Bi = ²ijk Bj jk .

µ0 µ0 µ0

The term Bj, j is like zero by (2.8), Ej,j = ρ/ε0 by Equation (??), and the rest

can be manipulated into

∂Si

(2.17) − + σij,j = ρEi − ²ijk Bj jk .

c2 ∂t

where the new tensor σij is given by

def 1 1¡ 1 2¢

(2.18) σij = ε0 Ei Ej + Bi Bj − ε 0 E2 + B δij .

µ0 2 µ0

Now we write out (2.14) and (2.17) in component form and obtain the set of

equations (the zeroes are inserted for clarity)

∂e ∂Sx ∂Sy ∂Sz Ex jx Ey jy Ez jz

+ + + =0 − − − ,

c∂t c∂x c∂y c∂z c c c

∂Sx ∂σxx ∂σxy ∂σxz

− − − =Ex ρ + 0 − Bz jy + By jz ,

c2 ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z

∂Sy ∂σyx ∂σyy ∂σyz

− − − =Ey ρ + Bz jx + 0 − Bx jz ,

c2 ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z

∂Sz ∂σzx ∂σxy ∂σzz

− − − =Ez ρ − By jx + Bx jy + 0.

c2 ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z

The four differential equations can be written as one matrix equation

∂

c∂t e Sx /c Sy /c Sz /c

∂ Sx /c −σxx −σxy −σxz

∂x

∂ · Sy /c −σyx −σyy −σyz

∂y

∂

∂z

Sz /c −σzx −σzy −σzz

0 −Ex /c −Ey /c −Ez /c cρ

Ex /c 0 −Bz By

(2.19) = · jx

Ey /c Bz 0 −Bx jy

Ez /c −By Bx 0 jz

which formally can be written

Tαβ ,β = Fαβ Jβ ,

or in frame independent notation

∇ · T = F · J.

13

Here the second order tensor T, the stress energy tensor, is given by

e Sx /c Sy /c Sz /c

αβ def Sx /c −σxx −σxy −σxz

(2.20) T = ,

Sy /c −σyx −σyy −σyz

Sz /c −σzx −σzy −σzz

the second order tensor F by

0 −Ex /c −Ey /c −Ez /c

def Ex /c 0 −Bz By

(2.21) Fαβ = Ey /c

,

Bz 0 −Bx

Ez /c −By Bx 0

and finally J by

def

(2.22) Jα = (cρ, jx , jy , jz ).

In four-space we need some definitions:

First the Minkowski metric

−1 0 0 0

0 1 0 0

ηαβ = 0

.

0 1 0

0 0 0 1

Coordinates in 4-space

xα =(x0 , x1 , x2 , x3 ) = (ct, x, y, z),

xβ =xα ηαβ = (−ct, x, y, z).

The del operator in four space

³1 ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ´

∇α = ∂α = , , , ,

c ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z

³ 1 ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ´

∇α = ∂ α = − , , , ,

c ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z

³ 1 ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 ∂2 ´

∇ 2 = ∂ α ∂α = − 2 2 , 2 , 2 , 2 .

c ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z

2.3. The vector potential in the elastic continuum. Equation (2.8) means

that the field B can be derived from some vector potential A

(2.23) B = curl A,

where div A is temporarily arbitrary, but can be given a fixed meaning later without

changing the term curl A.

By inserting (2.23) into (2.7) we get

curl (E + A,t ) = 0.

Therefore E + A,t may be represented as some gradient

E + A,t = −c grad φ,

hence

(2.24) E = −(c grad φ + A,t ).

Thus both E and B can be represented by some potentials A and φ. For the choice

of A and φ the Equations (2.7) and (2.8) are fulfilled.

14 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN

By adding and subtracting the same term c grad ψ,t into (2.24), we acquire

E = −[c grad (φ − ψ,t ) + (A + c grad ψ),t ].

We also have that adding c grad ψ to A leaves B unchanged. Hence the substitutions

(2.25) φ → φ0 = φ + ψ,t , A → A0 = A + c grad ψ

leave the properties E, B, j, and ρ unchanged for arbitrary functions ψ. The substi-

tutions (2.25) are called Gauge transformations (see http://www.mathematik.tu-

darmstadt.de/ bruhn/Maxwell-Theory.html).

The most obvious gauge is to set div A = div u which means to infer that the

spatial continuum is uncompressed. It would work equally well to set div u = const.

This picture is complicated by the assumption that there are true point-like sinks

and sources around, hence − div u̇ = ρ/ε0 (see Equation (??)), so we can introduce

a potential φ such that

ρ

−∇2 φ = .

ε0

This leads to the Coulomb gauge which works well if we consider a fixed frame in

the spatial continuum. What we need, however, is a gauge that works equally well

in a moving frame. This requirement leads to the Lorenz gauge after the Danish

physicist Ludvig Valentin Lorenz (1829-1891):

1

(2.26) div A + φ, t = 0.

c

Inserting (2.23) and (2.24) into (2.9) yields

1

curl curl A + 2 (A,tt + c grad φ) = µ0 j,

c

and by applying the mathematical identity

(2.27) curl curl A = grad div A − ∇2 A,

we obtain

1 1

A,tt − ∇2 A + grad ( div A + φ, t ) = µ0 j.

c2 c

Analogously by inserting the same properties into (??) we obtain

ρ

−(c∇2 φ + div A,t ) = ,

ε0

or by adding and subtracting 1/cφ,tt we acquire

1 1 ρ

φ,tt − c∇2 φ − ( div A + φ, t ),t = ,

c c ε0

1 2 1 1 cρ

φ,tt − ∇ φ − ( div A + φ, t ),t = µ0 · 2 .

c2 c c c ε0 µ0

By the Lorenz gauge and (2.6) the two potentials reduce to

1

(2.28) − 2 φ,tt + ∇2 φ = −µ0 · cρ,

c

1

(2.29) − 2 A,tt + ∇2 A = −µ0 · j.

c

These two equations can be expressed as one vector potential in four-space

∂α ∂ α Aβ = −µ0 · Jβ ,

15

where

Aβ = (φ, Ax , Ay , Az ),

Jβ = (cρ, jx , jy , jz ),

or in frame independent notation

(2.30) ∇2 A = −µ0 · J.

that flows through space with velocity c. Then the energy flow vector alternatively

can be expressed as

S = e · c,

and the energy density as

|S|

e= .

c

Next if we only consider disturbance energy without the presence of any sinks or

sources, Equation (2.17) reduces to

∂Si

= σij,j ,

c2 ∂t

∂ ³S´

= ∇ · σ.

∂t c2

Now, if σ is a stress tensor, then the divergence of it represents a force, hence

∂ ³S´

= f,

∂t c2

and we can define a new vector

def

(2.31) p = S/c2 ,

to obtain

∂p

= f.

∂t

Let us imagine some elastodynamic radiation trapped inside an imaginary box

with reflecting walls, and let the box be subdivided into m small cells containing

small parts of the radiation energy En . At a given time the sum of the energy flow

is given by

m

X

(2.32) E·v = Sn ,

n=1

hence the box is moving with some velocity v in the direction of S and it contains

an amount of energy given by

m

X

E= En .

n=1

16 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN

We divide Equation (2.32) by c2 and take the time derivative of it. We obtain

∂ ³ Ev ´ X ∂ ³ Sn ´

m

= ,

∂t c2 n=1

∂t c2

∂ ³ Ev ´ X

m

= fn ,

∂t c2 n=1

∂ ³ Ev ´

= f.

∂t c2

Finally we define a new property m given by

def E

m = ,

c2

or

(2.33) E = mc2 ,

and acquire

∂

(2.34) (mv) = f .

∂t

We can interpret this equation such that if we have a box containing a distur-

bance energy similar to m, then a force f is needed to give it an acceleration a = v̇,

provided that the property m, which we could call the mass of radiation, is kept

constant.

When the box is accelerated from zero velocity6, however, we have got to add

energy to it given by

dE = f · ds,

= f ds,

further into

d(mv)

dE = ds

dt

d E ´

³

= v ds

dt c2

1¡ ¢

= 2 v · dE + E · dv dv,

c

dE 1 v · dv

= 2 ,

E c 1 − v 2 /c2

6The situation is considerably more complicated if the box and the observer have an initial

velocity, say v0 . To address that question, one first has got to assume that the phenomenon

is observed in a Lorentz frame that makes the equations above invariant for the change of the

observer’s coordinate system, as Lorentz showed already in the fall of the nineteenth century.

That would make the observation fully relativistic, and v0 could be set to zero from where the

deduction could proceed as shown.

17

1

ln E = ln p + ln C

1 − v 2 /c2

C

= ln p ,

1 − v 2 /c2

E0

E=p ,

1 − v 2 /c2

m0

(2.35) m= p .

1 − v 2 /c2

Equations (2.34) and (2.35) bring the dynamics of confined disturbance energy in

line with Newton’s second law of motion and the relativistic mass increases with

velocity. Equation (2.33) is of course like the famous Einstein energy/mass relation.

3. Summing up

In this paper we have seen that the four equations (2.7) through (??) correspond

to James Clerk Maxwell’s (1831–1879) electrodynamic equations. Provided that

there are free moving sinks and sources in the spatial continuum, Equation (2.10)

demonstrates that they will generate a ”drag” just like Lord Kelvin postulated

for moving electrons in 1890 [2, page 247]. The energy flow vector in Equation

(2.13) is formally like Poynting’s vector after John Henry Poynting (1852-1914).

In a notation introduced by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), the field tensor

Fαβ in Equation (2.21) is like the Electromagnetic tensor, and the Elastodynamic

stress-energy tensor, Tαβ , corresponds exactly to the Electromagnetic stress-energy

tensor. Note also that the spatial stresses, σxy , correspond exactly to Maxwell’s

stress tensor that represent the mechanical stresses caused by electromagnetic fields

in space. Finally it is possible to describe deformation fields as a vector potential

in the spatial continuum. In this notation the fields, like electromagnetic fields,

are invariant by transformations between different Lorentz frames, after Hendrik

Antoon Lorentz (1853–1928), in rectilinear motion relative to each other. A moving

weightless box containing an amount of disturbance energy will have a momentum

corresponding to the energy in a material body with the same energy content. The

force needed to change its velocity corresponds to Newton’s second Law of motion,

and moreover, to increase the velocity of such a box towards the propagating speed

c of transversal waves will increase its energy towards infinity.

References

1. S. Flűgge (ed.), Mechanics of solids ii, Encyclopedia of Physics, vol. VIa/2, Springer, 1972.

2. Sir Edmund Whittaker, A history of the theories of aether and electricity, vol. I and II, Philo-

sophical Library, 1951.

E-mail address: ukarlsen@online.no

- Solution 8Uploaded byArthur Ding
- Gate Design ProcedureUploaded byNoppadol Ariyakrua
- Report torsion newUploaded byHepi_Reenzxs_4735
- AWS CWEngPart1&2BrochureUploaded byJoseph Peter
- ANSYS and Cable Stayed BridgeUploaded byZain Oo
- artigoUploaded byoscavier
- 0604-03RUploaded byMădălina Ștefan
- ME 2254Uploaded byShane Travis
- Tsaiwu Failure TheoryUploaded byricardo
- h 05744352Uploaded byIOSRJEN : hard copy, certificates, Call for Papers 2013, publishing of journal
- Guided TourUploaded byJenny Price
- 3D FEM Simulations of a Shape Rolling ProcessUploaded byJoseLuisBruzual
- SyllabusUploaded byNaga Abhishek Bollapragada
- me422 final reportUploaded byapi-319002611
- Strength of Materials - 2MarksUploaded byTrigger Dinesh
- GL_8.pdfUploaded byHaseeb Ahmed Janjua
- AER103A Course SpecificationsUploaded byMohamed Khairy
- Lecture 2 [Stresses] (1).pdfUploaded byJunhong Bap
- Vib Paster DqUploaded bysaeed shirvani
- Q Course for PERU PPT 2Uploaded byjhonaroni
- Pressure-Drop-Air-Compress.xlsUploaded byjgfingenieria
- Module_2_Lecture_2.pdfUploaded byRahul Sehgal
- Tugas Beton PrategangUploaded byHendri Hermawan
- MA3G2_title.pdfUploaded byHoracio Gutierrez
- CST.pdfUploaded byMarvinEbora
- Electricity and Ohms Law Lesson Plan (1)Uploaded byakhil
- CIVL311_Module 1_One_Dimensinal_Consolidation_September 8_Lecture_2.pdfUploaded byCedricChan
- ECG Vol 1 - 2002Uploaded byBrhane W Ygzaw
- Plane and axisymmetric models in Mentat & MARC.pdfUploaded byhalimsevim
- 194209497-Steam-Condensate-Pot-Sizing.pdfUploaded byjittshong8072

- The Great PuzzleUploaded byBjørn Ursin Karlsen
- Matter as Strings of Oscillating Nodes in a Spatial Continuum.The Schrodinger Wave Equation.Uploaded byBjørn Ursin Karlsen
- Property of InertiaUploaded byBjørn Ursin Karlsen
- Confined Energy in an Expanding Space Compared With GravityUploaded byBjørn Ursin Karlsen
- Standing Waves Between Singularities in an Elastic Continuum of Infinite ExtensionUploaded byBjørn Ursin Karlsen

- Ch1 Lorentz Group & Lorentz InvariantUploaded byKhalid Patmawijaya
- Lorentz Transformations Bernard r DurneyUploaded byAngela Castillejo
- [Tamas I. Gombosi] Physics of the Space Environmen(BookSee.org)Uploaded bybrky
- Brainwashed by Newton?Uploaded bysilagadze
- 0010055.pdfUploaded bySteven Scott
- Proceedings of the First International Conference on Superluminal Physics and Instantaneous Physics as New Fields as ResearchUploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- M Sc Syllabus Applied Mathematics PhysicsUploaded byComrade
- QFT Lecture NotesUploaded bynikhilm92
- General RelativityUploaded byArias
- lecture490_ch4Uploaded byprince_1986
- Theo-Phys-V-General-Relativity-2018.pdfUploaded byFagner Costa
- The Galactic Black Hole Lectures on General Relativity and Astrophysics - Falcke, HehlUploaded byHarsha Suranjith Amarasiri
- Albert Einstein - Nobel Prize Lecture July11,1923Uploaded bycatalass
- RG - Aldrovandi - Course on Classical FieldsUploaded byRaimundo Costa
- A Review of GAGUTUploaded byalkhwarizmi1968
- (Lecture Notes in Physics 839) Luis Alvarez-Gaumé, Miguel a. Vázquez-Mozo (Auth.)-An Invitation to Quantum Field Theory -Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (2012)Uploaded byZsolt Gyongyosi
- ClassiFields.pdfUploaded byCassiano
- 10-spinorsUploaded byandysitobello
- 2011-QFTUploaded byjoachin
- On the Vacuum Propagation of Gravitational Waves (WWW.OLOSCIENCE.COM)Uploaded byFausto Intilla
- Vol_59_Num_2_Spring_2000Uploaded byOvidiu Sso Sso
- Electromagnetic Field Theory. - Thide B. - 2002 - Upsilon Books - ElectrodynamicsUploaded bycristian1961
- Advances in Quantum Field TheoryUploaded byEd_afv
- 9781498722315_previewUploaded byPedroVázquezPeña
- Cp 3630 General RelativityUploaded byucaptd3
- 1401.5262.pdfUploaded byreimoro
- s EquationsUploaded bysiege
- DE0046DCDF6DAB6E40D7DC125798F0045E073 (1)Uploaded byJoel Curtis
- Relativity on Rotated Graph PaperUploaded bypankaj_mbm
- Einstein's Equations and Clifford Algebra_-_Patrick R. GirardUploaded byAndres Granados

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.