GOSAI NILESH H. DIVISION – A SUB: CASE OF BHAVNATH TEMPLE SUBMITED TO: Dr. D.R.D.

L. It calculated 4700 million cu.S. the both central & state government want overall economic development.. In this 1 plan the F.Introduction: The case is all about an increasing irrigation facilities after independence but there was certain problems with the removing location of BHAVNATH TEMPLE which is between the dam and people don’t want to change place of temple with that there are some other issue also there.74 lacks. Do ultimate overall development Problems: • • • • Temple get submerged.L. ft. miles. was 596 and R. In undivided Bombay province a proposal given to build dam on river.L. if all of three levels rose so that ultimate capacity raise to 1000 million cu. To do that 8 villages are totally submerged and resettled at other place. After making 1 proposal government made 2 proposal. in that F. But in 2 plan temple could not be saved but people remained adamant in there demand. was 601. Ft. Opposition by villagers People get displaced. By doing this the agricultural production increasing and irrigation facilities provide to larger areas. In that. 606.83 lacks revenue per year. The reservoir was to have catchments area of 230 sq. Water to develop 92000 acre of land. Religious sentiments. In 3 district.S. Directed irrigable area was 19300 acres and the indirect irrigation flow to some 73600acre. . This all require to providing new livelihood to people. The problem is that what should do to become success of this plan.F. 595 &H. It was 147. was 592 H.L.F.L. IN 1960 state of Bombay bifurcated and now Gujarat PWD department began to think about reopened the plan again. The average rainfall was 34”. Objectives: • • • To build the dam. After independence in 1947. If plan 1 was accepted than temple was saved by using gates to save from flood. This project was fully feasible in the eyes of government. They find this scheme was good for development. It yields 15. Agricultural production increase as 30400 tons. To increase agricultural production.

Constraints: • • Location of dam Religious sentiment can’t be changed. problem. Contingency plan: If it is not possible to build temple by construction of piller then take help from the religious leader. THANK YOU . By doing so peoples are permit to build dam on river. and criteria we can suggest that to succeeding this scheme government should increasing level of temple by above than flood level with using good construction peeler so ultimately height of temple raised and they saved from flood. Criteria: • • • • Cost should be minimized Maximum returns Minimum people affected Minimum time in implementation Alternatives: • • • • • • Plan 1 if no plan 2 Resettlement of affected people Wall around the temple Help from religious leader Convincing people about benefit Raising the height of temple Suggestion: From all above alternative we compare it with objectives.