Island Universe in the Invisible Ocean

29/01/2009 09:40

| | | |

| | | |

Home Glossary Credits Contact Us

Island Universe in the Invisible Ocean
| Posted on 18th of May, 2007 | I. The Night Sky This is Ambleside, Lake District in the evening. Please join me in this wonderful time you will remember for the rest of your life. Instead of the Cosmos, you may be thinking, why are we visiting the countryside? If you are a skilled astronomer, you already know what we are doing here. Keep your Binoculars handy. Let’s climb a little mountain just next to the beautiful Lake Windermere near the exotic village of Ambleside. While on the top of the hill, you can see the surroundings appear to be sleeping in the mist of darkness. Great Atlantic Ocean is not far from this location, you can smell its existence in the air, though invisible. Our topic of this episode is somewhat like the Invisible Ocean. Keep yourself warm and have some coffee. Away from the cities, in the darkness of night, here’s the Grand Natural Observatory. Don’t look for any building; it’s not the one you are thinking about, just look up in the Sky. You notice that there are at least 100,000 stars and fuzzy objects right in front of you. Look thru binoculars, another billion stars, fuzzy galaxies, colorful clouds, and possibly some planets i.e., Saturn will show up after a random survey. In the normal city you don’t see that much stars in the night sky. Further the well-developed and larger the city, fewer the stars you will see. This is the problem of Light Pollution as famously referred to. What do you know about what you are observing? The stars you see are sometimes hundreds of times larger than the Sun. And the Sun is a million times larger than the Earth. These stars look so small because they are located at the incredible distances. To give you the sense of distance, the normal stars visible by naked eye are normally located between 8 to 50 light-years. A light year is the distance in kilometers traveled by light (300,000 km/s) in one whole year; about 9.5 Trillion kilometers. Or, in other words, whatever happens to the star located at 50 light-years, we come to know after 50 years when its light reaches at Earth. Astronomers directly experience the past of the Universe depending upon how much farther they look. Likewise, the width of a normal galaxy is 100,000 to 300,000 light-years. The nearest and slightly larger than our own Milky Way galaxy, Andromeda, is located at 2.9 Million light-years from us. II. The Space from Atom to Universe But the most wondrous thing in the Universe is the one which is the most mysterious and we even don’t consider it a thing. That’s the Space. The 99% emptiness found everywhere; between the galaxies, stars, and planets. It even continues to dominate in every atom of the Universe, including yours and mine. After studying the structure of atom, we come to know that even atom’s contents are also 99% empty space and the rest of mass of atom does not show up to be a tangible thing. That makes the Space 100% of everything found in the atom and throughout the Universe. An intelligent mind cannot ignore this fact though it takes time to realize the Emptiness as a thing. This realization is the key to all of the locks of scientific and philosophical questions. III. The Creation of Spacetime Albert Einstein, the most brilliant mind of all times, realized this fact and formulated the Space and Time into a single entity called 4-dimentional Spacetime where the fabric of Spacetime can be curved and behaves differently in different situations and to the observers relative to their motion and location in the Universe. The Global Positioning Satellite system is the experiment of time dilation most of us do regularly as the evidence of curved Spacetime. Laws of Spacetime can be summarized as following: Speed of light is constant ‘through’ the space no matter how you measure it. An astronaut traveling at 150,000 km/s will still measure the speed of light at 300,000 km/s either traveling into the incoming light beam or getting away from it. Time slows down if you accelerate or you are in the strong gravity. Time will speed up if you are away from source of gravity i.e., Earth. Light bends near the source of gravity due to the curvature of Spacetime. Because these relativistic effects have been proven again and again since
file:///Users/ahsan119/Sites/Subspace/xSpace.html Page 1 of 6

Island Universe in the Invisible Ocean

29/01/2009 09:40

they were predicted, Theories of Relativity are the basis of major scientific developments and technologies. However, according to Einstein, Spacetime was created with the creation of Universe, the Big Bang. The Space we experience is just the collective gravitational field of the whole Universe. IV. Before the Big Bang: Theories of Relativity Due to the validity of Theories of Relativity, most of us are trained not to imagine any time and space before the Big Bang, though interestingly the Theories themselves do not impose this restriction. This is purely a matter of perspective. Theories of Relativity break down even at the nanosecond before the Big Bang. Asking what was before the Big Bang is like asking what lies north of the North Pole? There is a reason why Theories of Relativity break down at this level. These theories are designed to illustrate the dynamics of Spacetime, not what exists outside it. Its something like the game of basket ball. Though the stadium may be very big, the basket ball and the players are not allowed to cross the court's boundary line which is considered as a foul. All rules apply in this boundary line, not outside. If a player says that because all rules seem to apply in the court so there cannot be a whole stadium existing outside the court and because we are playing basket, there cannot be any other game existing outside the court whose rules are different than ours, is that right approach? This statement is made by the player, rules actually imply the existence of something large, in which the court is situated i.e., whole Universe of which the court is also a tiny part. In this example, the court's boundary line is the Spacetime. Thus the Theories do not actually deny the extra-Universal space, they just do not talk about and work there and it is not correct from any angle that the Theories deny the existence of different Spatial Dimension outside or beneath the Spacetime. The Theories just explain how does the Spacetime behave in certain situations and that it had a beginning. In other words, the Theories are the dynamics of whatever was created out of Big Bang's primordial nucleus, independent of where was it located, what rules applied in that Dimension, and furthermore, who made it? In contrast, most of the the later explanations of the Theories deny the existense of any Existence outside or beneath the Universe. It is thus not appropriate when many physicists deny the existence of something which they do not understand according to the current understanding and try to demote relatively counter-intuitive phenomena. History is the evidence, the definition of counter-intuition has been rewritten many times i.e., people were not ready to imagine a moving Earth because it was counter-intuitive. In contrast, many physicists those are not comfortable with absolute nothingness, which even should not make sense according to the originally supposed general relativity, proposed various models in which they consider the Big Bang as the 'local' Zero Time of our Universe. According to these models, there is a limitless chain of bangs and crunches, that is one universe at one time; the Big Bang was a result of previous universe's Big Crunch, and that our Universe may cause another Big Bang after collapsing on itself in the future. In other models, there are many universes existing, perhaps with their own physical laws, side by side as bubbles. These models predict the existence of underlying parent space on which other universes are floating. In relation to all objects in a given universe, this parent space is the only limitless entity. Unfortunately these models have been always targeted by science-fiction writers, who found 'valuable' concepts for the success of their plays. If a spaceship cannot achieve the speed of light or even greater, it loses the market demand. This is achieved by using the parent space of all universes, which is not bound by the speed of light. Another obvious integral part for the success of the plays is the 'intergalactic alien civilizations', which for unknown reason are always uglier than humans. Thus this sort of pseudo science normally harms the rational predictions of prospective hypotheses of existence and causes skepticism against them. Instead of applying fully consistent equations derived from actual Universe, which is indeed near-impossible task currently, we normally want the Universe to behave according to our equations. “We are used to the idea that events are caused by earlier events, which in turn are caused by still earlier events. There is a chain of causality stretching back into the past. But suppose this chain has a beginning. Suppose there was a first event. What caused it? This was not a question that many scientists wanted to address. They tried to avoid it, either by claiming, like the Russians, that the universe didn’t have a beginning or by maintaining that the origin of the universe did not lie within the realm of science but belonged to metaphysics or religion. In my opinion, this is not a position any true scientist should take. If the laws of science are suspended at the beginning of the universe might not they fail at other times also? A law is not a law when it only holds sometimes. We must try to understand the beginning of the universe on the basis of science. It may be a task beyond our powers, but we should at least make the attempt.” – The Universe in a Nutshell, Stephen Hawking. V. The Biased Perception If you happen to visit the 16th century when Copernicus introduced the Heliocentric System (planets orbiting the Sun) opposed to what usually people used to think was true, Geocentric System (planets orbiting the stationary Earth explained by earlier philosophers, Aristotle and Ptolemy), you could see the scientific and religious communities were not only skeptical but charged him with life-long imprisonment. They thought it silly to even consider Earth as a planet and moreover not in the central place. Galileo who later proved that the Sun has really the central place by observing the planets through the telescope, specially Jupiter along with its moons orbiting it, and the phases of Venus clearly indicating the Sun to be at center, was also put under threat by the authorities who thought its illogical to think what these gentlemen said. Not too far, Sir Fred Hoyle, English mathematician and astronomer in the late 20th century, commented on the Big Bang model of Universe: 'On philosophical grounds too I cannot see any good reason for preferring the Big Bang idea. Indeed it seems to me in the philosophical sense to be a distinctly unsatisfactory notion, since it puts the basic assumption out of sight where it can never be challenged by a direct appeal to observation.' - Measuring the Universe, Kitty Ferguson.
file:///Users/ahsan119/Sites/Subspace/xSpace.html Page 2 of 6

Island Universe in the Invisible Ocean

29/01/2009 09:40

Every age brings its own challenges so we must be able to investigate them without any biased knowledge and background. Only the unconditional approach reveals the nuts and bolts of the Universe. VI. Current Theories about Invisible and Limitlessness Though, the Theories of Relativity have provided many answers to historic questions, we must understand that the theories are never complete rather they manipulate the dynamics of particular domain, they always leave many questions unanswered. Albert Einstein himself was later working on to develop a more comprehensive theory of the Universe and Existence which could explain all questions including philosophical. But his dream was left incomplete and he transmigrated into ‘another dimension’. If he could have completed his Theory of Everything, we would have known the basic scientific idea where did he transmigrate, though we have indicative results from other scientific theories such as Quantum Mechanics and Superstring Theory. They talk about the Extra Dimensions and the Space & Time before Big Bang but mostly in a different manner, not solving the wider range of questions. For example, our universe may not be the only one; there are other parallel universes or outside ours (if it is so, then what is the parent Space on which these universes are floating?). Or, one universe collapses on itself triggering another ‘Bang’ for a new universe, creating the unlimited chain of universes (in this case, what happens to the already expanded Spacetime? Will the ‘New Bang’ create its own Spacetime overlapping the previous one or will the previous Spacetime also collapse along with other objects? Fact is that we don’t have any explanation for the former Spacetime to collapse in so-called the Big Crunch). You cannot rule out these possibilities, but many questions are not solved. There should be a comprehensive explanation to those questions which are not yet explained. VII. The Phenomenon of Life In the episode of Mysterious Universe, Life in the Universe, we tried to analyze the current theories about the phenomenon in which life could have started at various places in the Universe. We came know that the predictions of co-incidental theory are not in line with observation. Contrary to co-incidental theory, life is not spread beyond Earth. It is not a common phenomenon, rather it is not even rare; it’s the only one which happened on Earth, though ingredients of life are scattered everywhere in the Space. Combination of a few elements doesn’t animate itself and gradually becomes Einstein. VIII. The Unanswered Questions Out of many unanswered questions, these are on top: A) Source of Big Bang: When there was no 4-dimentional Spacetime existed in the beginning, where the super-dense nucleus of Big Bang was located? And, from where did the nucleus come from? And, why? B) Expansion of the Universe: Why did it expand faster than the speed of light where nothing can exceed the light limit inside it? If there is no Spacetime outside the Universe, then the Universe is expanding into what?. C) Voids and Extra-Universal Regions: In astrophysics, the Spacetime is considered as the gravitational field of the Universe. We know that the gravity follows the 'inverse squared law', as the distance from source of gravity increases, the force of gravity dramatically decreases; furthermore, the underlying gravity takes over. If a spacecraft leaves the Earth's gravitational field, Sun's gravity takes it over. Earth has no known influence on farther celestial objects nor they have upon Earth except the closer ones i.e., Sun, Moon, nearby Planets, asteroids and commets. Following the same line, What happens beyond the external regions where Universe’s gravitation field ends? And, what are those 'voids', the vast empty regions of space where the clusters of galaxies do not seem to have the influence upon each other? If they are not part of Universe's gravity then what's that? Recent theories predict the staggering 96% of Universe possessing unknown Dark Matter (invisible matter which has the same gravitational attraction as visible matter) and the Dark Energy (which works as anti-Gravity in the space). Even if this is the built-in property of the space, theoretically it is existing where the Universe is prevailing. Same issue comes again: Whats beyond the edge of this Universal gravity field? Lets imagine a famous example against the idea that it is non-sense to think whats outside, beneath, and before the Universe. According to 'Inflation Theory of Big Bang', an ant is sitting on one of the small colorful dots which you have painted on a black balloon. Now blow it up, an ant will see that every other dot is receding from her. Farther the dot is, faster it will recede. Now ant starts crawling on the balloon's surface. Given enough time, ant will return to its original dot after navigating the whole balloon. So for an ant there is no edge of the balloon, though it had a beginning and it is expanding, and every dot is receding from her. In this scenario, the ant is us, her dot is our Milky Way Galaxy, and other dots are other galaxies those are receding from us according to the Hubble's Law. The black balloon is the Spacetime. So, for us Universe has no edge, and it is non-sense to imagine any edge of Universe. Now, the question is, does this analogy proves that this is non-sense to consider anything outside the Universe? The no-edge system is the limitation of traveling in this example, not the structure of a balloon. Is any round object limitless in nature? Against this analogy, lets consider Earth. You start walking from your city westwards. Given enough time, you will come to the same point after travelling about 40,000 km. Now this doesn't mean that Earth has no edge, what about other directions which we are ignoring? upwards and downwards. If Earth has no edge, then we could never lift the spacecraft off into Space and reach the
file:///Users/ahsan119/Sites/Subspace/xSpace.html Page 3 of 6

Island Universe in the Invisible Ocean

29/01/2009 09:40

Moon. The fact is both analogies resemble the real Universe. The problem with ant analogy is what Inflation scientists are trying to predict has nothing to do with analogy, even if we increase the dimensions of analogy. D) Source of Life: When everything throughout the Universe is made from the same elements, why a combination of a few elements starts self animation in contrast to a combination of same elements which doesn't self animate at all. It is also worth noticing that all atoms possess motion of some sort inside them or being as molecules i.e., temperature. What is then the difference between 'living' and 'non-living' basically? The question is not how the life behaves or what are the characteristics of the living things, but the question is, what is life? E) The Particles of Matter and Anti-matter pop-up in pairs seemingly out of nothing, cancel each other, and go back to nothing. What’s their origin and destination? F) Where do the Black Holes connect in the end of their Singularities? G) Imagine Universe has some boundary and there is nothing outside it. What that nothingness is like? If thats not the Space or Vaccum, then the Universe must be confined by some gigantic walls of solid, liquid, gaseous, or plasmatic elements. Don't you think the Space or vacuum also dominates the atoms and particles? So, if those walls are not these traditional states of matter, then whatsoever that matter is, it must be occupying some space. Again space! So can you imagine something else other than the Space? Of course, this question has always been avoided because it forces one to conclude what cannot be proven currently, something like Sir Fred Hoyle's argument against Big Bang mentioned earlier. H) As we know we look back in time further we look deep in the space, why do the earliest galaxies (i.e., quasars) and protogalaxies we observe still seem to be encompassed by the same limitless space, the space which we see encompassing the modern galaxies as well (Milky Way and Andromeda), and the space we theorize as created with the Big Bang? As mentioned earlier, it’s not right approach to avoid the questions. These questions are basically the valid arguments in themselves. If one factor is true in philosophy, it cannot be false in science too. If one is true in science, it cannot be false in any discipline of knowledge. If one factor is true in one discipline, and false in another, it requires the investigation because the Truth is always independent beyond any artificially engineered disciplines i.e., science, philosophy, and religion in which we normally categorize everything. IX. The Subspace: Background of Universe The property of knowledge is that it predicts the existence of some other phenomenon which was not observed or realized previously. One of the predictions of astrophysics and astronomy is the invisible Dark Matter, which has to be present in the galaxy to be able to observe what is being observed i.e., rotation rate and formation of a galaxy. Another prediction is the invisible Dark Energy which works as anti-gravity to cause the expansion and acceleration of the Universe. Scientists claim the staggering 96% of the total volume of Universe to be the Dark. Though, We don't have any clear evidence of any of them, we know these are the natural consequences of the observation and the knowledge we have. On the largest scales possible, the dynamics of our Universe predict the existence of even something larger, the existence of the background Space, the Subspace, which has to be eternal in nature, and upon which every other dimension of space and time must be layered. The questions mentioned in the previous segment clearly indicate the required properties of the background Space. The laws of physics which work in our Spacetime bind our Universe to behave in a certain way i.e., elapse of time and difference of locality. The laws appear different in the Subspace altogether, though our Universe's laws are dependent on those underlying laws of Subspace. This can be perfectly underdood if we know that the dynamics of Solar System are different than the dynamics of Milky Way Galaxy, though, Solar System requires the dynamics of our galaxy beneath it to exist. It is though possible to limit our theories to strictly within our Spacetime, we would need extended formulation to unify our limited Universe with the underlying timeless and limitless dimension. This Subpsace must be dynamic otherwise it will not be consistant with observation, logic, and reasoning. While this Subspace exists independently, the other dimensions cannot exist independently because limited structures always have to be contained by something else. Therefore, it contains, and not contained by any other space. The following examples will shed light on the nature of hypothesized Subspace: The Cosmic Drawingboard: Draw a diagram of the Big Bang expanding as classical theories define. The paper on which you drew the diagram is the Subspace. See any diagram of Big Bang in any book in the library or on any website, you would always see the Black or a White background on which the Nucleus of Big Big or the curved Spacetime is printed. Even if you create the holographic image of Big Bang or Universe in the air or a Vacuum, you cannot avoid the 'medium', it may be air or a mere Vacuum. This would be a biggest mistake to say that Vacuum is nothing, if the Theories of Relativity are correct which do not allow even the Vacuum to exist outside the Universe or before the Big Bang. This limitation is not imposed because there is actually nothing outside the Universe or there is an evidence of non-existence before the Big Bang, it is simply because the mathematics involved in the Theories of Relativity break down even a nanosecond before the Big Bang. In reality, when involved deeply in the Big Bang, you cannot avoid that Vacuum, on which the Universe has been holographed including its Spacetime. That holographic 'medium' is the Subspace. Imagine something like 'non-existence', you would understand why there should be some Existence. Or try to draw the Big Bang without any medium on which normally you draw the diagrams. So simple to understand through the symbolic examples,
file:///Users/ahsan119/Sites/Subspace/xSpace.html Page 4 of 6

Island Universe in the Invisible Ocean

29/01/2009 09:40

though hard to understand its real dimensions. Eletromagnetic Radiation: Consider our Spacetime as visible portion of electromagnetic radiation (optical light), thus the Subspace is the whole spectrum of electromagnetic radiation. Other quantum dimensions are curled up in the invisible wavelengths of the spectrum. Iceberg: Think Spacetime as the tip of an iceberg, other quantum dimensions form the submarine part of an iceberg, and Subspace is the Earth itself. In this example, iceberg is also Earth because it is in it. This Subspace is independtly limitless, timeless, and free of any other forces which mark our Spacetime, thus accommodating faster than light travels i.e., expansion of the Universe; whereas, our Universe had a beginning, finite structure, Spacetime full of radiation, gravitation and electromagnetic fields, and limited by speed of light inside it, and is floating on this Subspace. This Subspace is the Source of primordial nucleus of the Big Bang and caused it to trigger. While the location of the Big Bang is everywhere in the Universe because source of everything in the Universe started from the Big Bang, there is a finite location in the Subspace where it banged. Possibly Universe has left that location far behind because Universe has moved away from that location at higher velocity than the expansion rate, though, relativistically it is not possible to determine the velocity of Universe because there cannot be any reference point in the omnipresent Subspace. The Universe is expanding into the Subspace where it started in the first place. Because it is timeless and dynamic in nature, it created and destroyed everything and events simultaneously but tagged everything with time dimension so that everything would seem to us happening on its specified time. This is not the constant time. One event may happen at different times for different observers. If you can observe the timings of a Photon, you will get different timings than if the Photon itself tried to observe your timings (please see the paper 'In the Light of Time' for more information). If our whole Universe is scaled down to a grain of sand (as it was at the Big Bang), the Subspace would still be the Sahara Desert stretched limitlessly in every direction in the Space. X. The Life in the Subspace Dimension (It is recommended that you read the article 'Life in the Universe' to understand the comprehensive definition of Life). There is no doubt that Life exists, as far as we know. We ourselves are the Life and the observers of Life so first evidence comes from our ownselves. Before stating how the Life is based on DNA, we have to analyse the 'spark force' behind DNA. Can a mixture of elements starts animating by itself? Is there any reliable experiment which proves it? Though, in the phenomena of life, DNA plays a vital role, there must be some unknown Force which propels the DNA. This Force is the source of Life as well as the root of the Universe. Unifying Life to Subspace makes the Life the timeless in nature due to its source. The different combinations of mixture of few elements serve as the difference among the outlook of various life forms. According to this explanation, there is no difference between the human and a dolphin at Subspace level, but there is definite difference between them further you look their outer layers i.e., apparent evolution of consciousness and way they live. Death of a life-form therefore means its true awareness of timeless nature by transitioning into the invisible but not absent quantum dimension. Because we do not see our nose though it is closest to our eyes, we also ignore the timeless nature of our life. In any experiment, combining the elements would not cause the mixture to start animation and gradually evolve to become the Physicist of the Century. It would not even animate the fly. In the most worst situation, you would expect the elements to combine themselves and get evolved to be the one like you. XI. Travelling Unconsciously Let’s demonstrate our 'awareness' this way. You are probably sitting on a chair, thinking that you are not in a motion. Fact is that the Earth is spinning at 1667 km/h, at the same time it is in orbit around the Sun at 108,000 km/h. Sun is in orbit around Milky Way galaxy at about 1 million km/h. Milky Way galaxy is one of the members of gravitationally bound galaxies called Local Group of Galaxies which is also on move at tremendous speeds. This whole Universe is expanding in different directions. You will end up approaching the Speed of Light, just by sitting on your chair. Likewise you are not aware of this background dimension of Space residing in the every atom of your existence. The grandeur the reference point, higher the velocity thus predicting that you are in fact floating in the Subspace faster than light which is not the limit outside our Universe. If the laws of physics are different outside the Universe, then experiments must also be different to detect the orbit or spin of the whole Universe from inside. If laws are the same, then the expansion of the Universe can be acounted as the result of Universal Centrifugal Force acting on the Superclusters of the galaxies without even requiring the staggering amount of repulsive Dark Energy in the case of Universal Spin, though current redshifts of the receding galaxies may not completely be caused by this Centrifugal Force. According to this explanation, even if there is an axis of the Universe somewhere, it is not possible to locate it precisely without the exact reference of Subspace. Hopefully with the launch of James Web Space Telescope and the Planck Orbiting Laboratory we will be able to detect the Centrifugal Force or any other phenomenon which will provide the evidence of Subspace. From the relativistic point of view, it is however important to note that there cannot be a specific reference point in Universe which can be used as a background to determine the velocities of objects relative to each other, for instance, both situations are correct: a fast train left the station behind or the station which travelled backwards from the train. Or in other words, a chicken crossed the road or a road was slipped backwards beneath the chicken. Likewise, being in the Subspace it doesn't make sense where your location is in the Subspace. A velocity of a limited Universe in the limitless Subspace cannot be determined by any means because there are no limited reference marks in Subspace i.e., time, when used as a reference frame. This lack of limited reference marks makes it possible for the Subspace to be present all the time in the every location, from the atom to Universe and beyond.
file:///Users/ahsan119/Sites/Subspace/xSpace.html Page 5 of 6

Island Universe in the Invisible Ocean

29/01/2009 09:40

XII. The Conclusion 'Does the Universe as a whole move? Of course the Universe is expanding, but what about the other types of motion? For instance, does the Universe rotate? Is it moving through some larger environment? The reply comes in the form of another question: In relation to what could the Universe as a whole be said to rotate or not to rotate, or to move or not to move? We have come almost full circle to questions that date back to antiquity. Some of them have become meaningless. Others seem likely to remain forever unanswered. But some of the questions that our ancestors, even those with minds like Kepler and Newton, probably didn't think could ever be known by human beings, are now, according to modern astronomers, astrophysicists and theoretical physicists, almost within our reach.' - Measuring the Universe, Kitty Ferguson. One day we may learn to interact systematically with this background Space which has to be the environment in which not only the Universe rotates and orbits, but it is the same environment which was before the Big Big, and currently serving as underlying Space, something like the underlying gravity fields of Sun, Milky Way Galaxy, and Local Group of Galaxies those for all general purposes we are not likely to detect most of them while sitting on Earth. If we are successful to comprehend this parent environment, all mysterious locks of Universe will be opened with one grand key: Unification of Quantum world with Relativistic phenomena, formulation of Theory of Everything, explanation for Faster-than-Light Travel and Time Travel, Creation out of Nothing, and similar tasks which we may encounter in the future. "Our yearning for a unified theory could not have evolved outside a religious culture deeply influenced by Monotheism. This claim may cause some atheistic high-energy physicists to cringe, since they view the pursuit of knowledge as completely devoid of theological influences. In response, I ask them to consider the notion that we live within time and yearn to transcend it. The pursuit of an all-encompassing theory, rational and technical as it is, is also the passionate pursuit of something much larger than ourselves, something timeless, universal, all-determining." - The Prophet and the Astronomer, Marcelo Gleiser. This is an invitation for anyone who wants to research scientifically on this hidden and theological environment. To imply that we don't know something, generally we do one of the following: We link many unknown phenomena to this environment theologically, or we express the same feeling on scientific grounds by referring to Uncertainty Principle of Quantum Mechanics. Both are partially right and partially wrong. We actually need to investigate this Theological Environment itself which is indeed the Ultimate Reality about which almost all cultures, religions, and empirical scientific theories indicate though indirectly. Though this investigation may prove to be extremely difficult, it is not likely that we can formulate the theory of everything without it. Instead of direct observations, which seem beyond our reach, the indirect evidences shall shed light on it; something like the dark matter and energy which are always detected indirectly. It is not impossible; there are some people who access this background Space without their conscious knowledge, the Invisible Ocean of Creation, the Subspace. Questions: ahsan119@hotmail.com

2007 © SubSpace Research, Manchester, England

file:///Users/ahsan119/Sites/Subspace/xSpace.html

Page 6 of 6

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful