13-5005-OP ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ______________________________________________________________ In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse and sui juris private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary agent of debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK AMENDED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS ______________________________________________________________ Petitioner’s Emergency Motion to reargue en banc the September 20, 2013 Per Curiam Order of Circuit Judges Garland, Chief Judge, and Henderson and Brown, in the Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus and equity relief from the State of New York and Congress. PETITIONER Christopher Earl: Strunk © in esse Agent American Freeman, in esse and sui juris Private Citizen of the United States of America Private Citizen of the state of New York Private Resident of the County of Kings All Rights Reserved 593 Vanderbilt Avenue -281 Brooklyn, New York 11238 RESPONDENTS R. Craig Lawrence U.S. Attorney's Office (USA) Civil Division 555 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20530 Hon. Irvin B. Nathan Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia 441 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Office of the NYS Attorney General Joshua Pepper NYS Assist. A.G. 120 Broadway 24th Floor New York, New York 10271 Hon. Eric M. Thorson Inspector General of the United States Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington D.C. 20220 Authorities State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.” U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2 states “Each United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” U.S. Constitution Article 4 Section 1 - full faith and credit provisions U.S. Constitution Article 4 Section. 2. - The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States. U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. USAC Amendment XII Clause 1: “The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate.” The USAC 20th, 25th amendments 13-5005-OP U.S. Const. Amendment 17 : “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. ..” legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United States and has been a resident of the state of New York for five years, and, except as hereinafter otherwise prescribed, of the assembly … district for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election; … or member of assembly at the such, must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembly district is contained for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election. …” CASES NYS Const. Art. 3 Sec. 7: “. No person shall serve as a member of the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or alteration of the … assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be eligible to serve as United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)……………………………..…….…12 Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875)………………………………………………….…………..….12 McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995). STATUTES The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 (40 Stat. 411, enacted 6 October 1917, codified at 12 U.S.C. § 95a et seq.) the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Title II of Pub.L. 95–223, 91 Stat. 1626, enacted October 28, 1977 The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 and PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011; UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. Election Law Article 12 N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 13-5005-OP Petitioner’s Declaration In Support Of Emergency Motion to reargue en banc the September 20, 2013 Per Curiam Order of Circuit Judges Garland, Chief Judge, and Henderson and Brown, in the Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus and equity relief from the State of New York and Congress. I, Christopher Earl Strunk © in esse and sui juris, the sole secured beneficiary and Agent of the Business Trust debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, (Petitioner) being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746 as follows: 1. That pursuant to the caption Petitioner Agent seeks to reargue en banc (under FACP Rule 35 and local rules) the September 20, 2013 Per Curiam ORDER of Circuit Judges Garland, Chief Judge, and Henderson and Brown, see Exhibit A, in the Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus among other relief including a declaratory judgment on the constitutional issues raised inter alia involving the Court’s plenary power to define the actual meaning for use of the 12th , 14th and 17th Amendments and Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 as to the meaning of “natural-born Citizen” under the United State Constitution as then would be used by the New York State Courts, and among other states / courts, and the Congress as to its plenary duties both as to the 25th Amendment and the current requirement to order the various governors of the respective states for the conduct of elections for National Offices in the Executive and US Senate per se under the respective provisions of the 12th and 17th Amendments, see Exhibit D; and 1 13-5005-OP 2. That relief also applies to the case Strunk v Obama et al DCD 10-cv00486 taken on appeal in this Court with appeal case number 12-5289, and also in the state of New York for the elections conducted in November 2012 and by December 15, 2012 denying Petitioner Agent his Section 1 Fourteenth Amendment unique right as a National US Citizen with sole secured beneficial interest in the profits and earnings of the debtor business trust in whose name a segregated private account is owned and controlled by the United States and the US Secretary of the Treasury; and 3. That Petitioner is not an enemy combatant on conquered territory of the fifty states or a Surety Indenture for the Debtor organization entity with its title to all its property and labor owned by the State of birth, in that on October 15, 2012 Petitioner released the trustee States nunc pro tunc. 4. On September 14, 2013, the New York State Supreme Court County of Kings with Index 2012-21948 dismissed his Petition, see Exhibit B, when Petitioner demanded his right to substantive due process and equal protection against the arbitrary State actions by mis- application and administration of law, and having been denied without Court permission to include the NYS Board of Elections as the necessary respondent. 5. That the State Court Justice issuing the Order, shown as Exhibit B, did so by having dutifully followed the dicta as subordinate to the April 11, 2012 2 13-5005-OP decision and order of his fellow misbehaving Judge who ran a star chamber against me in the case Strunk v NYS Board of Elections et al. with Kings County Index 2011-6500 to dismiss the complaint with prejudice and sanctions thereby took away my right to civil action in State Court against the NYS Board of Elections and named defendants; and therein, held plaintiff was somehow “ fanciful, delusional and frivolous” , because I dared challenge the constitutional eligibility of the obscene Usurper and his fraud. 6. That misbehaving Judge has yet to decide my motion for rehearing filed in May 2013 on his judgment of March 29, 2013, a judgment outrageously delayed for an entire year after his April 11, 2012 star chamber decision and order– there is no downside in New York State martial process. 7. That this Panel Decision erred with regard to this Petition in their failure to apply Petitioner’s non statutory status as Christopher Earl Strunk in esse and sui juris is the sole secured beneficiary and Agent of the Business Trust debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK filed with the Clerk of Kings county in Index 2012-21948, see Exhibit C; 8. The filing shown as Exhibit C changed my status from that of an enemy combatant on conquered territories as defined since the National Emergency martial process that replaced the civil process by the Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) Proclamations: 2038 of March 5, 1933 for an 3 13-5005-OP emergency session of Congress, 2039 of March 6, 1933 declaring a bank holiday and 2040 of March 9, 1933 for a continual national emergency then validated by Congress with the Amended Trading with the Enemy Act that put American citizens into perpetual servitude on March 9, 1933, and that until this day is renewed annually as an act of enormity that takes the debtor/surety tax payments along with collateral property and labor, for investments in the government influenced markets serving the Vatican, via the United Kingdom, Creditors to the 1933 United States Bankruptcy Debt Reorganization Plan. The same Creditors who prefund purchase all of the Debtors’ Federal tax cash flow paid annually through the Creditors’ Internal Revenue Service based upon the expectation of lifetime (65 years) income of every debtor / surety-indenture payment to the Creditors’ trustees for the ongoing U.S. bankruptcy debt reorganization plan implemented in 1933. 9. That Exhibit C includes my own: • AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Notice of Rescission of Signatures of Suretyship—NUNC PRO TUNC-- with 2 pages affirmed April 29, 2013 • Commercial Security Agreement – witnessed w/ 4 pages affirmed April 15, 2013 • UCC-1 Financial Statement registered with the Secretary of State of Kentucky with file 2012-2614943-04 on December 12, 2012 • NOTICE OF RELEASE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION filed and recorded in Clerk’s Office October 16, 2012 BPA BOOK 28 Pages 172 thru 175 10. That Petitioner’s secured sole beneficiary status history is germane affirmative judicial notice herein for the Em banc panel to consider: 4 13-5005-OP a) That American National citizens, Public citizens (artificial persons) and Private citizens (natural persons), are protected by the federal government via Section 1 of the 14th Amendment after 1868. b) The artificial person/Public U.S. citizen attached to every 14th Amendment natural person/Public U.S. citizen is a creation of each State government via a Birth Certificate on file in the State of the natural person’s birth. The name of this artificial person/Roman persona is in all capital letters and termed “Capitis Diminutio Maxima.” This all-caps name is a “nom de guerre” (name of war) for the Roman persona/Public U.S. citizen to be treated as an enemy of war by every Emergency War Powers court. Further, the name tag of every American soldier is in all capital letters, also indicating his name of war. Thus, the all-caps name is used for both soldiers and enemies captured in war publically residing in the states deemed mere conquered territories by the de facto Military Government in Washington, D.C. c) All income of the artificial person/Public U.S. citizen, for which the individual 14th Amendment Private U.S. Citizen is subordinate Surety, may be income/excise/privilege taxed. All income of the artificial person derived from any source whatsoever may be “war taxed” save those sources exempted by the Congress or “mandatorily excepted”---the “Church” and its 5 13-5005-OP “integrated auxiliaries.” d) That historically the de jure Federal US Citizen of the Republic of the United States status became a New Status in 1868 when the prior Federal US Citizenship became National US Citizenship. e) That Americans transitioned from being first citizens of our state and thereby citizens of these United States (Article IV, Section 2), with privileges and immunities that included common law rights on a Federal Level, including the First Eight Rights of the Bill of Rights, to being first Citizens of the United States and thereby Citizens of the State wherein they Privately resided at Common Law (14th Amendment, Section 1), with Privileges and Immunities with NO Common Law Rights on a Federal level; f) There was a loss of Common Law Rights in 1873 as Fundamental Rights/Common Law Rights, when the Supreme Court declares Fundamental Rights/Common Law Rights ARE NOT Privileges and Immunities of New National U.S. Citizenship ( 1 ); and g) Further, that the New Status went to Contract in 1906, when the National 14th Amendment US Citizen becomes Surety for the Artificial Person/Martial Persona, became Surety for an Artificial Public U.S. citizen 1 new 14th Amendment American citizenship do not include “fundamental rights,” do not include “common law rights” and later, do not include the first eight Bill of Rights, Maxwell v. Dow (1900); Twining v. New Jersey (1908). Slaughterhouse cases, 1873. Supreme Court rules privileges and immunities of the 6 13-5005-OP in Commerce created on the State level by Contract through Operation of Law, and the Individual Public U.S. citizens lie dormant until March 9, 1933 and the Individual Private U.S. Citizenship continues until March 9, 1933. h) Further, that the New Status in Contract was activated in 1933 with the above referenced Emergency War Powers Proclamation 2040 of March 9, 1933, thereby the Individual Public U.S. citizens created on State Level are NOW SEIZED as “Booty of the Federal Government; Individual Private U.S. Citizenship absorbed into Public U.S. citizenship; the Private U.S. Citizen is wedded and attached to Public U.S. citizen; and therefore, the Private U.S. Citizen is now Surety for Public U.S. citizen and that the altered Citizenship creates Altered U.S. Jurisdiction i) Further, the New Status in Contract in Commerce of 1935 as seized Booty: rendered the Artificial Person/Public U.S. citizen PLACED IN COMMERCE—Public U.S. citizens now Insured Surety - Private U.S. Citizen can Fight and Pay for Pope’s Crusades with endless war (reference War is Racket by Gen. Smedley Butler) and enrich the creditors so that the Natural Person/14th Amendment Private U.S. Citizen is Surety for 14th Amendment Public U.S. citizen in Commerce, and the Artificial Person/Roman Persona/Public U.S. citizen Given a Social Security Number/Tax Identification Number 7 13-5005-OP j) Further, that there was Loss of Federal Common Law Process and Federal Common Law Rights in 1938 when the Natural Person/14th Amendment Citizen loses all Common Law, Federal common law and Federal common law rights of natural persons previously protected by U.S. Supreme Court Decisions NOW OVERRULED by two “Roosevelt Court”, Decisions e.g. Erie Railroad case, 1938 overruled Swift v. Tyson (1842) and Caroline Products case, 1938 overruled Lochner v. New York (1905); k) Further, that the New Status in Contract at War in the 1950 Emergency War Powers Executive Order then activated the status that governs all In Personam Jurisdiction. Both Criminal and Civil Jurisdictions, of both Federal and State Courts are now Military in Process; Courts are Constitutional in FORM, but Military in SUBSTANCE. These Courts fly Federal and State Martial Flags with three sides bordered with gold fringe and or with gold cords and tassels. l) AFFIANT contends a child to be a “natural born Citizen” (s)he must be born in the country to parents who are both either “natural born Citizens” and or “citizens of the United States” by naturalization at birth or after birth. m) AFFIANT on January 23, 1947 was naturally born in the geographic United States of America, in the state of New York, in the city of New York, n) AFFIANT, a natural person, became a de jure, natural born Private 8 13-5005-OP United States Citizen on the day of his natural birth pursuant to Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; o) AFFIANT, by operation of law, was pledged as Property for, wedded to and made Surety for, a de facto, artificial person, statutory Public United States citizen by means of a “Certificate of Live Birth” filed with the County of New York, in the State of New York , on January 24, 1947; p) AFFIANT, by operation of law, was restored to his former status of being a Private United States Citizen upon the filing of a “Notice of Release Without Consideration” being NUNC PRO TUNC with the Clerk of Court, Lamar County, Georgia, on October 15, 2012; q) AFFIANT has eliminated any presumption of fact that Affiant is Property of, or Surety for, said statutory Public United States citizen by filing a “Notice of Rescission of Signatures of Suretyship—NUNC PRO TUNC” with a public office of the Court Clerk in Kings County, the State of New York, in which county Affiant makes his home, privately residing on the land at Common Law and not publically residing according to statute; r) AFFIANT, by virtue of his constitutionally protected status of being a Private United States Citizen, is as foreign to the present de facto Emergency War Powers jurisdiction of the United States, the former de jure Common Law jurisdiction of the United States (as per Section 1 of the 14th 9 13-5005-OP Amendment) having been altered and/or modified into the present de facto Civil Law jurisdiction of the United States by a congressionally-amended, World War I statute and a subsequent presidential proclamation, both events transpiring on March 9, 1933; THEREFORE: s) t) u) v) w) x) y) z) aa) bb) cc) AFFIANT is not a statutory public “United States citizen;” AFFIANT is not a statutory public “resident” of the United States; AFFIANT is not a statutory “United States person:” AFFIANT is not a statutory “non-citizen national;” AFFIANT is not a statutory public “citizen” of the State of New York; AFFIANT is not a statutory public “resident” of the State of New York; AFFIANT is not a statutory “resident alien;” AFFIANT is not a statutory “non-resident alien;” AFFIANT is not a statutory “taxpayer;” AFFIANT does not have a statutory “tax home within the U.S.;” AFFIANT is a “nontaxpayer” pursuant to Economy Heating and Plumbing v. United States, 470 F.2d 585, 589 (1972); dd) AFFIANT, as a matter of public record, is the Non-Surety Agent and Attorney-in-fact for the transmitting utility and Public U.S. citizen “CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK;” therefore Affiant is the beneficial owner of all income derived from his exclusive use of the NAME of “CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK,” presently under public commercial lien and copyrighted, copy-claimed and trademarked by Affiant. 10 13-5005-OP ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________________________________________________________ __ In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse and sui juris private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary agent of debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK AMENDED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS MOTION FOR EM BANC HEARING Exhibit A USCA Case #13-5005 Document #1457649 Filed: 09/20/2013 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 13-5005 September Term, 2013 Filed On: September 20, 2013 In re: Christopher Earl Strunk, Petitioner BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge, and Henderson and Brown, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the amended petition for writ of mandamus; the motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis; and the motion to waive fees, it is ORDERED that the motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis be granted and the motion to waive mandatory fee reduction be dismissed as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner suggests no jurisdictional basis for the relief requested. See Telecomms. Research & Action Ctr. v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 77 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (explaining that the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), “merely permits a court to issue writs in aid of jurisdiction acquired to grant some other form of relief”). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. Per Curiam 13-5005-OP ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________________________________________________________ __ In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse and sui juris private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary agent of debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK AMENDED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS MOTION FOR EM BANC HEARING Exhibit B 13-5005-OP ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________________________________________________________ __ In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse and sui juris private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary agent of debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK AMENDED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS MOTION FOR EM BANC HEARING Exhibit C AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH Notice of Rescission of Signatures of SuretyshieNUNC PRO TUNC Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl: Stmnk, i n esse and sui jurfs, being duly sworn, depose and declare under penalty of perjury that: I, Christopher Earl: Strunk, hereby rescind and revoke Nunc Pro Tunc every signature of suretyship, public and private, ever provided by Affiant on behalf of the New York business trusuartificial persodstatutory Public U.S. citizen "CFFRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK ," created on January 24, 1947; This AFFIDAVIT OF TRWH: Notice of Rescission of Signatures of SuretyshipNWNC PRO TUNC extends to every public government contract-federaI, state, county and city. This rescission and revocation of public signature of suretyship includes, but is not limited to, the initial application for a social security nurnber/taxpayw identification number;every individual andlor corpomte tax retm ever filed, be it federal, state, county and/or city; the initial application for selective service in the Armed Forces of the United States; every application for an individual driver" license. federal and/or state, as well as every driver" license, federal and/or state; everq. app tication for a United States passport as we1 l as every issued United States passport: every application for voter registration as well as every voter registration card; and every other public government contract, known and unknown, evidencing a signature of suretyship; This AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH: Notice of Rescission of Signatures of S u r e t y s h i v NUNC PRO TUNC extends to every private business contract. This rescission and revocation of private signatures of suretyship includes, but is not limited to, every application for a bank account, individual and business; every application for any form of insurance, including life insurance, motor vehicle insurance, business insurance, and home insurance; and every other application involved in any private business endeavor andlor private investment evidencing a signature of suretyship; This AFFR;)AV1T OF TRUTH: Notice of Rescission of Signatures of SuretyshipNUNC PRO TUNC is retroactive to the date of January 24, 1947, the date of the public filing and registration of affiant's Certificate of Live Birth in the State of New York, County of New York within the city of New York. This AFFlDAVIT OF TRUTH: Notice of Rescission of Signatures of Suretyship-NUNC PRO TUNC aIeng with a true copy of the CommerciaI Security Agreement amrmed April IS,20 13 (attached) on which it is based, will be kept by the Kings County Clerk on file as part of the Case 2 1948-2012 at the public office of Kings County Supreme Court 360 Adams Street Brooklyn 9.120I as of the I~ day of May, 20 1 3. Further Affiant Sayeth Not. Christopher Earl: Strlrnk, American Freeman, in esse and sui _juris Private Citizen of the United States of America Private Citizen of the state of New York Private Resident of the County of Kings All Rights Resewed STATE OF NEW YORK ) BEFORE ME, on this day personally appeared Christopher Earl: Strunk known to me to be the person described herein and who solemnly affirmed that every statement given above was the whole truth to the best of his knowledge. Subscribed and Affirmed before me on this of ,2013. NA\L a f day I-IP.RRV HELFENEALI?:7 C o v i r n ~ s ~ i o 0~ 4 e37nds r Clip of ~ F W YO'^ - N Q . ~ - Y R ~ Cert~l!c? F:lorl : ~ i~ 7icbwnr6 Conlrn,ss:on T - X D I ~ P S ::]me 30. 2 0 Notary Publi oc(&FfiL Commercial Securitv Agreement Parties The parties to this Commercial Security Agreemcnr, intending to be legally bound by ail the terms and conditions stated below, are within the standards and norms of the International Commercial Codc, and applies to the parties as follows: 1. Christopher Earl: Strun k (secured party/creditor of CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK), a de jure Private Citizen of the United States of America Prira tely Residing at his Common Law domicile located at 593 Vanderhilt Avenue of Brooklyn within thc city of New York and the county of Kinps subdivision of the State of New York. (See Exhibits I & 2 . ) 9 c And, 2. CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK (dcbtor to Christopher Earl: Strunk), a statutory plrhlic citizen of the United States, priblicly residing at 593 Vandcrbilt Avenue PMBos 28 I of Brooklyn, NY. 1 1238. (See Exhibit 2.) Terms 1 . Christopher Earl: Strunk, secured partylcrcditor of debtor CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, agrees to use the name of dcbtor "CH H ISTOPRE R EARL S T R U N K in all public and private contracts far the benefit of the sccured party/creditor. 2. CHRISTOPHEH EARL STRUNK. debtor to secured party/creditor Christopher Earl: Strank, agrees to appoint secured party/creditor to bc its Agent with a general power of aaomcy to execute all public and private commercial contracts using the name of debtor "CHRESTOPHER EARL STRUNK" as a transmitting utility for the benefit of the Agent/secured garty/creditor in the use and management of the Agent's personal and real property. Further, debtor CHRISTOPH.EHEARL STRUNK hereby conveys all right, title and interest to any and a\ l property, reaI or personal, held or registered in the name of dehtor "(71EIUSTOPWEREARL STRUNK,"to secured partylcrcdizor Christopher Earl: Strunk. This propcrty includes, but is not limited to. all assets, liabilities or accounts held in the debtor-s name or for the benefit of the debtor w-hich the debtor or partially owns, or in which the debtor has a security interest, as well as vehicle rcgistrat ion certificates, deeds or contracts regarding real property, stocks and bonds, accounts. notes and judgments receivable. all life or health Cornmercial Securitv Agreement insurance policies and any private trust account held by the United States Treasuty o r any other account held by an office of the United States. This conveyance is NUNC PRO TUNC, its effective date being January 24, 1947. the date of the fiIing of a Certificate of Live Birth in the name of "CW RCSTOPHER EARL STRUNK" hy the State of New York. (See Exhibit 1 .) 3. Christopher Earl: Strunk secured partylcreditor, shall not be personally liable for the public or private debts of debtor CWSTOPH'ER EARL STRUNK. since Christopher Earl: Strunk is not surety for CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK as a matter of public record. (See Exhibit 1.) Christopher Earl: Strunk shall he liablc for his own public and private debts incurred in the use o f the name of the debtor "CHRISTOPHER EARL STKUlrFK." 4. This Commercial Securip Agreement shall begin to be i n full force and effect upon its filing and keeping with a public office of the State ofNew York, and specifically witnessed by t h e below Notary Public. I f this Ayreement may not be considered to be a binding bilateral contract by a cowrt of record, then it shall be held to be a Unilateral Contract Under Seal meeting thc requirements of specific intent, being in writing, signed. sealed and filed with a puhlic ofice. Duration The life of this security asreemcnt shall continuc until the natural death of Christopher Earl: Sbmnk and or his successor in interest or the State of New York or its successor in interest terminates the leyal existence of business trust organization CHRISTOYFFER EARL STRUNK. #fgpDate enusecured Party Creditor . 9ot-9 W N t L I t s - 2-0 I CH"R.ISTOPHXREARL STRUNK DATE 3 Commercial Security k s e e m e n t STATE OF mw YQRK 1 ) ss. COUNTY OF KINGS 1 BEFORE ME, on this day personally appeared Christopher Earl: Strunk known to me to be the natural person described herein and who solemnly a f f m e d in quadruplicate that every statement given above was the whole truth to the best of his knowledge; and AFFIRMS this Commercial Secr~rity Agreement. as a matter of public record, that the ORIGINAL with certified copies of Exhibits annexed will bc kept on file under seal at the public office of the Clerk of the Kings County Swrroyate Court of the State of New York i n accordance with the State of New York C W E R 17B Estates Powers and Tmst law. as instructed by Affmant of the Clerk and as duly served upon the Clerk with the necessary filing lee by the United States Postal Service, evidenced by certified mail with return receipt no.: 70103090000192292993 as of this Subscribed and Affirmed before me on this day of M 'f - day of 1P @C3fim,c 20 13. U M A L P. $0N1, Notary Public 26 Court Street County of Kings Brooklyn, New York 1 1201 ..:/ -. . #- . . , -., ; , .- -: ,. ' '. f-. . , , : . , , _. I L - ; : , . ; . -! , - , : , . "/.,!'# rork . I . L l->{:l~qly re.; '.'r..-> : 21, 2015 M ' ~ - Commercial Securitv Agreement Eric .Ion: Phelps (secured partylcreditor of EM C JON PmLPS). a dej w e Private Citizen of the United States of' America Privately Residing at Common Law in his home located at 203 South. Fort Zellcrs Road. in the town of Newmanstown, on the lmd of Lebanon County, in thc Cntmonwealth of Pennsylvania. this Commercial Security Agreemeac as a matter of public record. with the undcrstandi ng that the OR1GINAL with certified copies of Exhi bits annexed will be kept on tiIc under seal at the public officeof the Clerk of the Kings County Surrogate Court of the Statc of New York in accordance with the S a t e of New Y ork CHAPTER 17B Estates Powers and Trust law as a required witness for Christopher Earl: Strunk and or his successor in interes~ nr the State s f New York or ib successor in interest terminates the legal existence of business trust and as if a last wil E and testament according to law BEFORE ME, on this day personally appeared Eric Jon: Phelps known to me to be the natural person described herein and who solemn1y al'fimed that every statement given abovc subiect to thc final execution and filing of this Commercial Security Agreement was the whole truth to the best of his knowledge. / ;/ & I Subscribed and Affirmed before me on this day of Ma~eh.2013. I , i bid: I dh I , , . ,- 8 Bill ~lertzo~;!,Notir~ ,public I 02 west Lincoln ALe. County of Lebanon Myerstown, Coinrnonwealth of Pennsylvania 1 7067 wdy# L. HemW, Nstary Public Revised Article 9 UCC Search UCC Search Results File amendment to this UCC _[ k t u m to search -1 'File number: Filing date: Lapse date: Status: 2012-2614943-04 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 12/12/2017 4:57:28 PM A - Active ACTIONS Actlon Initial financing Statement F i l e Date 12/12/20124r5f :28 PM Status -. Active - Filed online NAMES Debtor/Secuted Parw/Fller Debtor CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK OrgID: 03766 Type: BUSINESS TRUST ~ukisdiction:NEW YORK Dats Added Address 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 593 Vanderbllt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn NY 11238 593 Vanderbift Avenue Brooklyn NY 11238 593 Vanderbilt Avenue Brooklyn NY 11238 Secured Party Chsisto~her Earl StrunkFlier Christopher Earl Strunk 12/12/20124:57:28 PM - 281 - 281 12/12/2012 4:57:28 RM COtlLATERAL DESCRIPTION Date Filed Collateral Description 12/12/20124:57:28 PM THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE ENTERED INTO THE COMMERCIAL REGISTRY ACCEPTED FOR VALUE EXEMPT 'FROM LEVY ALL PROPERTY OF DEBTOR INCLUDING ORGANIZATION NAME, "CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK". -- IMAGES Document Type UCC Filing - Initial financing Statement PDF -- Tiff Image File Date Pages PDF w 8 am 3 *nm Q E P U R CLERK ---- 7-rn AT PfiGES I= NOTICE OF RELEASE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION TO : STATE OF NEW YOFX, Releasee -& I N RE : USWFRUCT 'CIWISTQPHER EAF& WRUNK," ' C H R J S T O ? ~ , s ? ; K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ # r i s t a E. p hSkunk" er 1 h~rrhy rertic the wi t $ i ~ and fowgaing to be FROM: Christopher Earl Strunk, in esse Releasor a trw. correct and cnmalete cow . . o " h e orirind that ap ea - f r~corrlIR this o f f i ~ ~ , STATE OF NEW PORK ) n i s -L&pr - - - - - r o -2012 COUNTY OF KINGS 1 =* 1 Deputy Cl~rk, L ~ r n Superior ~r Co~irt Accordingly, I, Christopher-EarI:Strunk in esse (Releasor)being duly snTom,depose and say under penalty of perjury: Re Ieasor until further notice i s located for service at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue -28 1 Brooklyn, New York 1 1238 within the State of New York subdivision of the city o f New York. I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, absolutely release all personal property interests, legal and/or equitable, i n the public United States Citizen aCHRESTOPHER EARL STRUNK* created on January 24, 1947, upon the filing of the trust instrument i n the State o f New York subdivision County of New York within the City of New York, the USUFRUCT Deed Certificate No.: 03766 with t h e CertiFication of Birth NO0232437 (see Exhibit A). I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk i n esse, reserve all personal propem sights. Legal and equitable. granted or secured by the Constitution of the United States. the Constitution of the State of New York and related law. I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, intend no longer to be the SureQ for the State-created public United States Citizen "CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK," 'CHRISTOPHER E. STRUNK," "ChristopherE. Strunk" or any derivative of the "nom de guesre" thereof, such as 'CHRISTOPHE R. STRUNK with ID NO. UX94571Am. I, Christopher-Earl:Stmnk i n esse, presently a resident of the State o f New York, intend to return to my former natural-born Citizen status conferred at my natural birth on January 23, 1947 of licensed Citizens, that status being a private individual United States Citizen conferred by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,and further de5ned i n Hale v HmkeI ,20 1 US 43,74. I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk i n esse, intend to be legally bound by this Release executed and delivered in accordance with Chapter 17-B o f the State o f New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Article 1 0 Section 9.2 Release of a power of appointment This Release renders null and void any previous Release filed with any third party record keeper of the State of New York and or subdivision(s). '-g/L': ' . I + 0- L ~hristi&er--~l: si&k f'.-'.>. A t. -;.Fc!-q !* , = >-- " . . ., ' .- .; , ' '.; /;-. ,1:;-'2 1 ":,Fl.a ;\!-",;; ? ; , ;< p,.-'." P Ir1 . '.. .= ,. + I . . ; . ... ... Sp.: . ..r .. . L " l ,,' >, <\,* .. + . I , ? !*. , : - I-:;.:]!y -1' -- M u " ~ / qa@kEbed ~ X* T l c r n ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ Whn badeoard nslble u d q z Ctvg(pne immPQta1sly above mapnltylngS'. ~ e w ~ ~ ~ i t y ~ ~ / 8 ~ ~ h t s w a m ~ h m t - . ~ w t b a ~ * r h o n ~ & ~ ~ : N O F - BIRTH . SEX.. UT -' -. + . ICK' 'B ' ~ h N T ' S Nfif NOTICE OF RELEASE WITHOUT CONSlDERATION Exhibit A MMAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR CQUF BPA BOOK PAGES I ' f 4 DEPUTY C STATE OF NEW YORK SUBDMSION COUNTY OF NEW Y C WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW Y O R TO : STATE OF NEW YORK, Releasee C / O THE CLEFX OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK with Chapter 1 7 I 3New York State Estates, Pou~ers and Tmsts m c l e 10 Section 9.2 Release ofa power o f appoinhent IN RE : USUFRUCT "CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK," 'CHRISTOPHER E. STRUNK," "ChristopherE. StrunK . FROM: Christopher Earl Strunk, in esse Releasor NOTICE OF RELEASE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION Exhibit A - USUFRUCI' Deed Certificate No.: 03766 with Certification of Birth NO0232437 Dated: New York, New York , 9 20x2 +, Christopher Earl S t r u n k i n esse Releasor 593 Vanderbilt Avenue -281 Brooklyn, New York 1 1238 STATE OF GEORGIA SUBDMSION COUNTY OF LAMAR TO : STATE OF NEW YORK,Releasee C / O THE CLEW OF THE COUNTY OF LAYAR STATE OF GEORGIA WITHIN TOWN OF RARNESVILLE,GEORGIA with Chapter 17-5of t h e New York State Estates, Powers and Tmsts Article I0 Section 9.2 Refewe ofapower of appointment Sub-Sem'on (c) Such release may be delivered to any of rhc following: (3) Any person, other than the donee. who might be adversely affected by an exercise of the power. M RE : USCTFRUCT "CHRISTOPHER EARL STaUNK," UCHRISTQPHER E.S'IRUNK," "Chiaopk E.Strunk" FROM: Christopher Earl Strunk, in esse Releasor NOTICE OF RELEASE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION Exhibit A USUFRUCT Deed Certificate N o . :63766 with Certificationof Birth NO0232437 - Back cover of the October 1,201 2 submission tendered in New York Caunly. Dated: Brooklyn, New York October 9 , 2 0 1 2 Christopher-EarI: Strunk i n esse Releasor 593 Vanderbilt A v ~ n u e-281 Brooklyn, New York 1 1238 Phone 845-90 1-6767 Fmail: chris@strunkws TO:The Honorable Dareen A. Quinn, Chief Clerk of the KWGS COWNTY SURROGATE COURT 2 Johnson Street Brooklyn, N Y 11201 Phone : 347-404-9708 Subject: Filing under seal of the Christopher Earl: Shvnk last will in tcstament for safekeeping under the State of New York Chapter 17-B of the Estates Powers and Trust Law. I Afirmed Corn mercial Security Agreement pages 1 through 4 with Ekhibit 1 : Christopher-Earl: Strunk UCC Jnitial Financing Statement 12112/20 12 4:57:28 PM :2012-2614943-04 Active - Filed online Exhibit 2: NOTICE OF RELEASE WITHOUT CONSIDERATION Exhibit A - USUFRUCT Deed Certificate No,: 03766 with Certification of Birth N00232437. Recorded by the Lamar county Georgia Superior court clerk 1 I on October 1 5,20 12 at 4:44 PM RPA book 28 Pages 172 through 175. I Dated: Brooklyn, New York April 15,2013 Christopher-Earl: Strunk i n esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue -28 1 Brooklyn, New York 11238 Phone 845-90 1-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws Christopher-Earl: Strunk, United States ex rel. V OBAMA ET AL Appeal Case No: 12-5289 EX RELATOR APPELLANT’S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT NOTICE OF MOTION TO RECONSIDER, STAY AND OR LIFT THE MANDATE OF AUGUST 1, 2013 AND RENEW TO CALENDAR Exhibit 7 Workspace Webmail :: Print https://email06.secureserver.net/view_print_multi.php?uidArray=22951|... Print | Close Window Subject: U.S. Postal Service Track & Confirm email Restoration - 70103090000192293013 From: US_Postal_Service@usps.com Date: Wed, Aug 07, 2013 2:00 pm To: chris@strunk.ws This is a post-only message. Please do not respond. Christopher Strunk has requested that you receive this restoration information for Track & Confirm as listed below. Current Track & Confirm e-mail information provided by the U.S. Postal Service. Label Number: 70103090000192293013 Service Type: Certified Mail™ Shipment Activity Location Date & Time May 28, 2013 4:11 am May 26, 2013 12:36 pm May 26, 2013 11:33 am May 24, 2013 12:30 am May 23, 2013 May 23, 2013 1:43 am May 22, 2013 5:42 pm May 22, 2013 3:36 pm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Delivered Available for Pickup Arrival at Unit Processed through USPS Sort Facility Depart USPS Sort Facility Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility Dispatched to Sort Facility Acceptance WASHINGTON DC 20220 WASHINGTON DC 20220 WASHINGTON DC 20018 WASHINGTON DC 20066 BETHPAGE NY 11714 BETHPAGE NY 11714 BROOKLYN NY 11201 BROOKLYN NY 11201 USPS has not verified the validity of any email addresses submitted via its online Track & Confirm tool. For more information, or if you have additional questions on Track & Confirm services and features, please visit the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) section of our Track & Confirm tool at http://www.usps.com/shipping /trackandconfirmfaqs.htm. Copyright © 2003-2013. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 8/7/2013 5:25 PM 13-5005-OP ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________________________________________________________ __ In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse and sui juris private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary agent of debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK AMENDED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS MOTION FOR EM BANC HEARING Exhibit D 13-5005-OP ________________________________________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ______________________________________________________________ In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse and sui juris private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary agent of debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK AMENDED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS ______________________________________________________________ Petitioner Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus with FRAP Rule 21 Order that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection and injured: A. under color of state law as to operation of the U.S. Constitution (USAC) Article 4 Section 2 (A4S2) as to the 12th and 14th Amendments for separate election of POTUS and VPOTUS without provision at the primary and general election equal with the electoral college by distinct ballot………………11 B. under color of state law and Congressional resolve as to the USAC 12th and 14th Amendments and USAC A4S2 by operation of USAC 20TH and 25TH Amendments ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………18 C. under color of state law and Congressional resolve as to operation of the USAC 12th , 14th , 20TH and 25TH Amendments and USAC A4S2 as to USAC Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) eligibility………………………………….20 D. declare the incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while holding an office of trust or profit under the USAC 14th Amendment United States (U.S.) and as to USAC A4S2 regarding USAC Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2S1C2)…………………………………………………………………..21 E. under color of state law as to operation of the USAC 17th and 14th Amendments in election of the U.S. Senator from New York without provision of the separate ballot for qualified electors at the primary and general election by distinct ballot according to the qualifications of electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature……………………………………….23 F. hold a trial to resolve that the suspected $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 be declared null and void under the USAC 14th Amendment Section 4……………………………………………………………………………………………………..25 G. And deserving for such other and different relief until this matter is resolved herein……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….30 13-5005-OP PETITIONER Christopher Earl: Strunk © in esse Agent American Freeman, in esse and sui juris Private Citizen of the United States of America Private Citizen of the state of New York Private Resident of the County of Kings All Rights Reserved 593 Vanderbilt Avenue -281 Brooklyn, New York 11238 Phone 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws RESPONDENTS Hon. Eric M. Thorson Inspector General of the United States Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington D.C. 20220 Hon. Irvin B. Nathan Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia 441 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Hon. Karen L. Haas Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Capitol, Room H154, Washington, DC 20515–6601 Hon. John A. Boehner Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives 1011 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 Senator Mitch McConnell United States Senate 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-1702 Senator Harry Reid United States Senate 522 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2803 Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 1 . 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 27. 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Steven C. Farkas, Esq. of COLLERAN, O’HARA & MILLS, L.L.P. Representing Mario Cilento 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 450 Garden City, New York 11530 Joshua Pepper NYS Assist. A.G. Office of the NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway 24th Floor New York, New York 10271 In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk O in esse and sui juris private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary agent of debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK AMENDED PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF KINGS ) I, Christopher-Earl :Strunk O in esse and sui juris, the secured beneficiary and agent of the straw man debtor organization CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK (Petitioner, Agent), being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury: 1. The Court's 18 April 2013 Order is an offer of contract received and accepted for value timely without dishonor and with consideration and returned due by May 18, 2013 redrafted of my choosing with exhibits in accordance with Court rules offered for contract under reserve without pr~judice without dishonor without recourse in good faith no dolus, in support of Petitioner's amended Petition for relief; and District 2. Petitioner Agent is a duly registered voter of the 6 4 ' ~ l e c t i o n of the 57thAssembly District (AD) and within the New York 8th U.S. House District at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 for ten years with email: chris@strunk.ws and cell phone 845-901-6767, and is an enrolled member of the Republican Party who participated at the November 6 , 2012 General Election (as in the previous 2008 election), there voted entirely for the Republican Party line of candidates and electors for Mitt Romney for POTUS on a combined ballot rather than distinct ballot for Paul Ryan the candidate for Vice President of the United States (VPOTUS) and W-endy Long for U.S. Senate from New York; devised under color of state law despite the mandate of both the lzthand 17thUSAC Amendments. 3. That the New York Republic on July 26, 1788 ratified the USAC and express Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2SlC5) (') mandate that a candidate for the ofice of President of the United States (POTUS) shall be a "natural born Citizen" (NBC). 4. Agent as a U.S. Constitution (USAC) 14" Amendment Section 1 national U.S. Citizen de jure of We the People who wishes relief in accordance with the Uniformed Commercial Code (UCC) and U.S. Constitution Article 4 equal protection by Congress and the state of New York as a State of the several States under the United States of America (USA) and related law as to the de facto President of the United States (POTUS) by this USAC Article Ill court with civil authority and jurisdiction in lieu of the martial rule administrative municipal law process existing since except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States." ' United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: "No Person 1933 when emergency powers were granted POTUS by amendment to The Trading with the E n e m yAct of 1917 (40 Stat. 4 11, enacted 6 October 19 17, codified at 12 U.S.C. § 95a et seq.) (TWEA) by Congress who along with the States' Governors act to empower the POTUS executive trustee and U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Receiver / Trustee to administer the bankruptcy of the USA for the foreign creditors and lnternattona/ Monetaly Fundstill ongoing with changes incorporated by Congress since 1977 with the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Title II of Pub.L. 95-223, 91 Stat. 1626, enacted October 28, 1977 authorizing POTUS to regulate commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States which has a foreign source with power enlarged now with 7-he USA P A T M T A c t o f 2001 and PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act o f 201I;and Agent is as the redeemed secured beneficiary of debtor trust superior to foreign creditors with liens against debtor(s). TWEA is a United States federal law to restrict trade with countries hostile to the United States. The law gives the President the power to oversee or restrict any and all trade between the U.S. and its enemies in times of war. In 1933 the U.S. Congress amended the act by the passage of the Emergency Banking Relief Act which extended its scope regarding the hoarding of gold to include any declared national emergency and not just those declared solely during times of war. President Franklin D. Roosevelt then used these new authorities to essentially outlaw gold ownership through the issuance of Executive Order 6102 and since the lnternational Emergency Economic Powers Act, Title II of Pub.L. 95-223, 91 Stat. 1626, enacted October 28, 1977. 2 5. Based upon information and belief, the only constitutional oath to be found is the oath the POTUS takes, which is word for word the same as the required text in the Constitution. POTUS does not take the oath of office in USC Title 5. As long as there is one officer with an oath required by the Constitution (not an oath of office required by the Congress), the people still have a trustee for the trust on which the de jure people are the beneficiaries. That beneficial interest is what gives people the right to accept for value instruments that are issued for value. They have an antecedent claim from a preexisting contract. Their claim is a right to enjoy freedom with liberty. It is based on constitutional guarantees. Since 1933, the people also have a right to a distribution from another trust created by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Since 1933, all property is held by each State of the several States for the creditors of the bankruptcy of the USA. That means the State has the legal title to all substance in the States but the people have equitable title through their beneficial interest in that trust as long as each person no longer is the surety of the debtor straw man. Taking control of the gold in 1933 would have been unconstitutional if the new trust had not been created. The President's oath is an offer to the people in the several States. It is prudent for people to accept his oath, IF the person is eligible for POTUS as it is not an oath that is issued for value made in good faith - BUT if ineli~ible for POTUS the oath is offered for value in bad faith. The principles of offer and acceptance apply to this very critical premise. If the people have not accepted that oath, how can they expect the man who made it to be working for their benefit? (emphasis by Petitioner) 6. Based upon information and belief, there are no Article VI oaths that can be found for any members of the legislatures (state or federal), or executive and judicial officers of the United States or of the several states. They all have United States Code Title 5 oaths. The POTUS cannot take the Title 5 oath of office. He already has another oath to the people. He and others are deemed to be qualified 'To hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States". Notice that only individuals who are "elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services", are required to have the Title 5 oath. They do not hold offices of trust. The President does. Only members of the legislatures of the States and the United States, and executive and judicial officers, who are bound by the Article VI oatt-i, can hold offices of trust. Those who take the Title 5 oath of office can hold offices of honor or profit under the United States. An oath is different than an oath of office. 7. Based upon information and belief, since none of the members of the legislatures or executive and judicial officers of the United States has the oath required by Article VI of the Constitution, the only way they would have a duty to you is through the oath of the POTUS, the executive trustee of the trust created by the Constitution and the trust created by President Roosevelt. His position as President (Article 2 Section 1) comes in the Constitution before his position as Commander in Chief (Article 2 Section 2). His oath is required in Section 1, not Section 2. 8. That based upon Barack Hussein Obama It in esse, doing business as debtor organization BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II (hereinafter known as the "Usurper" "OBAMA and or "SOEBARKAH"), by his own public admission against interest as an exception to the hearsay rule in his autobiographies and campaign statements that his legal father is a British subject, confirmed by his offer of purported Certificate of Live birth in 2008 and again in 2012 (notwithstanding the authenticity); and thereafter, also is confirmed by the Foreign Student INS records of his legal father and the March 20, 1964 divorce decree and thus, prove Barack Hussein Obama II in esse is not NBC - therefore ineligible for the office of POTUS; and 9. As such, Petitioner on January 23, 2009 duly fired OBAMA when he offered his contract to Agent on January 20, 2009, Mr. OBAMAYs every act is void in ab initio; and notwithstanding all OBAMA'S acts being void ab initio again usurps the office of POTUS to Petitioner Agent's detriment and injury, gave notice of a replevin action in November 2009 to Timothy Franz Geithner of the U.S. Treasury; 10. Therefore, Agent as a de jure private U.S. Citizen as well as a 14" Amendment national U.S. Citizen uses Petitioner's Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus with FRAP Rule 21 for an Order that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection and injured as a result of the 2008 and 2012 Election Cycle for office of POTUS, VPOTUS and U.S. Senator from New York, and caused as a result of the defacto POTUS executive trustee wasting of the Agent creditor's superior beneficial interest in the U.S. Treasury Trust accounts aided by VPOTUS acts that are all void ab initio including the null and void appointment of Timothy F. Geithner, Neal Steven Wolin, Jacob Joseph Lew, that renders Eric M. Thorson Inspector General of the United States Department of the Treasury fifth in line to POTUS after Patrick F. Kennedy Under Secretary of State for Management with Term of Appointment from 11/06/2007 to present fourth in line to POTUS behind John A. Boehner Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, lacking a 3rd line of succession from the Defense Department - requires remedy by this honorable panel. 11. That as background to this original proceeding petition for a writ of mandamus of the State and Federal respondents, in January 1999 Petitioner started a series of court cases challenging the obvious corruption of persons within the Democratic and Republican Party who colluded to among other things fix the 2008 election of POTUS and VPOTUS along with a very long list of persons and organizations, that constitute by formal definition "the enterprise" that now act with the Usurper to expand emergency powers in order to further limit individual freedom and liberty, and facilitate the theft of $43 Trillion Dollars, and among others I have filed: Petitioner NYS case Strunk v Paterson ef a/. 29642 (2008) State Complaint depending upon the law of the case from 29641-08 challenging their right to vote for an ineligible person for POTUS; Petitioner USDC DC Case Sfrunk v US DOS and DHS 08-cv-2234 (2008) FOlA request for the passport and travel records for Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama, Soetoro) and Barack Hussein Obama II ; Petitioner NYS case Sfrunk K NYSBoardofE/ecfions eta/.in Kings County with lndex No.: 2011-6500 based on common law fraud injury to he as a private national US citizen, that on April 11, 2012 was dismissed with sanctions and prejudice with a Judgment entered on April 10, 2013 with a motion to renew and reargue filed May 2, 2013 see sub Exhibit B Petitioner NYS case Sfrunk K Jefferies ef al. in Kings County with lndex No.: 21948-2012 Petition challenging the 2012 winning electors htt~://www.scribd.com/doc/l39483145/NOM-to-RENEW-Strunk-v-JeffriesEt-aI-w-Exhibit-NYS-SC-Kings-County-Index-No-21948-2012-ChaIlenc~e-toNew-York-Electoral-College slate compatibility and right to vote for an ineligible POTUS and VPOTUS, and election of U.S. Senator from New York under color of and 17'~ NYS Election Law Article 12 contrary to USAC 12'~ Amendments dismissed 04/03/13, with motion to renew 05/02/13, on 05107113 the Court ordered a 05130113 non-jury pre-trial conference. 12. That there has been steady growth of an "Enterprise" as defined by civil RlCO standards since the 1986 forced collapse of the savings and loan industry that has served as a vehicle to forward a huge theft of U.S. Taxpayer / debtor backed securities and obligations including the trust accounts associated with use of birth certificates and Social Security trust funds within the Federal Reserve Banking system for private use by the foreign creditors contrary to public policy, that is backed by public and private U.S. Citizen property as if a tacit moral obligation unilateral contract existed; however, the 1999 Clinton Administration elimination of the GlassSteagle Act protection to comingle risky investment and commercial banking activities; and 13. That in 1999 then HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo as the single fiduciary devised rules and policy to increase and conceal non performing loans for use by the Freddie Mac FDR era quasi public entity that has also assumed control over a huge number of real property mortgages as a result of the 1986 collapse of the Savings and Loan Industry then absorbed using the Resolution Trust Corporation and commercial banking industry that in short was devised among Pritzker, Dworman, Annenberg, Ayers, Geithner, and other powerful families associated with the Le Cercle ", 1UO1 Club Military Order of Malta ('j, Pilgrim Society (4) , Commercial Club of Chicago r/', Sovereign Council for National Policy (g) among other persons including Adnan Khashoggi and James Riady in coordination with JP Morgan Chase partner Monsanto Company (lo)to further Southeast Asia and Africa subprime investment and property acquisition efforts of the enterprise to convert property and launder the proceeds with questionable securities and general accounting practices coordinated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; and 14. The Enterprise's present pawn, Barack Obama (whose mentor is Fr. Gregory Galluzzo S.J. in Chicago), has Karl Marx's spiritual mentor http://www. bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol pilgrimsociety01.htm 5 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopoiitcalsociopo iecercle07.htm#-rhe Vat ican-Paneuropa network http://www.bibliotecapleyades.netlsociopolitica/sociopol1001 club01.htm http://commercialclubchicago.org/ ' http://www.orderofmaIta.intl?lang=en http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Council~for~National~Policy 'O http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto 10 Fr. Luigi Taparelli S.J. "Social Justice Doctrine" of 1832 as the Usurper's 1 ideology of Utopian Islamic dualism that underlies his sinister acts and A fakia methods since entering public office in Illinois; and of the acts, OBAMA is cleariy guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment, intimidation of witnesses and racketeering high crimes. 15. So what does Petitioner - Agent reasonably expect from this humble Court? A remedy for each of the following matters within the jurisdiction and authority of this Court to resolve by this Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus FRAP Rule 21 Order that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection and injured: A. 16. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation in this Petition paragraphs 1 through 15 with the same force and effect at length but for brevity omits same and wishes that the Court grant an opportunity that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection and injured: under color of state law and Congressional resolve as to operation of the USAC 12'~ ,I , 2oTH and 25TH Amendments, USAC A4S2 and UCC as to USAC Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) eligibility of the de facto POTUS. 17. That as a matter of Judicial Notice Petitioner contends that there is controlling history and law regarding construction of the Declaration of Independence of 1776 that was adopted as the foundation for the respective States' constitutions, including that of New York on April 20, i777, and that the Revolution expressly eliminated the feudal doctrine of perpetual allegiance, or that condition based upon a natural person's soil birthright subjugation as property of an absolute sovereign, and the People of New York; and that the repugnant feudal perpetual allegiance doctrine previously imposed by the monarchy and British Common Law before 1776 has been alleged re-established so that "natural born-subject" somehow equals "natural born citizen" with the ulterior motive of providing amnesty for 20 to 50 million illegal aliens in 2013 thereby to further collateralize the bankrupt USA debt being expanded by the Usurper for the Enterprise replacing the SCOTUS decision in United States v. Wow Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) by eliminating legal domicile status of alien parents as if under the longstanding English common-law principle of /;ws so//; and notwithstanding Minor v. Hamerseff88 U.S. 162 (1875). 18. That unfolding the amnesty plan is a bipartisan application of British Common law shows there is no difference between the Democrats or Republican party dicta, as the Californian of some repute Edwin Meese, Ronald Reagan's attorney general, in 2005 used his prestige and position at the American Heritage Foundation (some say because he anguishes about his own shenanigans gone array as Attorney General with the 1984 Amnesty of illegal aliens) to expressly roll back America to before the 1776 Declaration of Independence, uses the feudal doctrine of perpetual allegiance that defines an individual's status as if property subject to the ownership by a monarch and or sovereign oligarchy. Perhaps Mr. Meese is preparing for the new nation killing amnesty starting with the 2005 preparation during efforts rejected during the Bush Administration that remains the American Heritage Foundation use for a new amnesty with say 30 million illegal aliens put on a path to citizenship in 2013; and that Mr. Meese expressly conflates British Common Law "Natural-born subject" use as if it were synonymous with American Common Law use of "Natural-born Citizen", the American Heritage Foundation says the following: ""Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than chitdren of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) " 19. Petitioner contends that the Founders in the 1776 offering of the Declaration of Independence was to reassure the colonies the basis to leave the feudal perpetual allegiance to the Monarchy of British Common Law and as such the New York Republic on April 20, 1777, for the People of the New York Republic revoked perpetual allegiance use of British Common t a w as repugnant in use of the New York Constitution at Article 35 (in part) that: "X9WV. And this convention doth further, in the name and by the authority of the good people of this State, ordain, determine, and declare that such parts of the common law of England, and of the statute law of England and Great Britain, (...) That all such parts of the said common law, and all such of the said statutes and acts aforesaid, (...), or concern the allegiance heretofore yielded to, and the supremacy, sovereignty, government, or prerogatives claimed or exercised by, the King of Great Britain and his predecessors, over the colony of New York and its inhabitants, or are repugnant to this constitution, be, and they hereby are, abrogated and rejected. (...) (Emphasis added by Petitioner) 20. That the Framers and Founders to replace feudal perpetual allegiance with natural law doctrine Natural Born Citizen inheritance of allegiance from citizen parents and or that of the father used the Greek and oma an(") term of art "natural-born Citizen" first defined by Aristotle who gave us a definition of a "natural born Citizen." In "Politics, Book Three, Part 11, Aristotle, writing in 350 B.C.E., as translated by Benjamin Jowett see http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politi.html and Cicero in the "A Proposal Roman law provided: "Lex MENSIA, That a child should be held as a foreigner, if either of the parents was so. But if both parents were Romans and married, children always obtained the rank of the father, (patrem sequuntur liberi, Liv. iv. 4.) and if unmarried, of the mother, Uipian." Alexander Adam, Roman antiquities: or, An account of the manners and customs of the Romans 210 (6th ed. corrected 1807). " For Printing in English," The Select Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, According to the last Oxford Edition 17 (Henry Eefbeck trans. London 1720), says: "The Colophonians ciaim Homer as their own free Denizen, the Chians challenge him as theirs, the Salaminians demand him again for their own, but the Smyrneans assert him to be their natural born Citizen; and therefore have also dedicated a Temple to him in their Town of Smyrna. There are a great many besides at Daggersdrawing among themselves, and contend for him." 21. Then, as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a U.S. Passport to live with his grandmother who: (i) obtained foreign student funding, (ii) illegally obtained a stolen Social Security Number no later than 1980, (iii) forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and now after the death of the mischievous grandmother, inter alia SOEBARKAH in furtherance of usurpation of the office of POTUS no later than April 25, 2012, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii and is the simple matter before this court for a trial of facts. 22. That Petitioner further contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances maybe as many as five (5) British, Kenyan, Indonesian, Canadian, United States by oath of office, and despite taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, the Usurper levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GULEN Movement of Turkey and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through Morocco to replace the Ottoman Caliphate dismantled in 1921 by Winston Churchill and Thomas Edward Lawrence, CB, DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935); and the Usurper giving the enemies foreign and domestic of the Enterprise aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, thereby is guilty of treason, and that any candidate elector and or public officer who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason. 23. That based upon information and belief Barack Obama is the asset of the Pilgrim Society, Le Cercle, 1001 Club, Commercial Club of Chicago, Sovereign Military Order of Malta, Council for National Policy, whose powerful membership overlaps with the directorships in various think tanks, mainstream media, financial institutions, taw firms, corporations, and far more entities; that all covertly support the Usurper to complete the European Union -EU (Fourth Reich), as directed by Fr. Peter-Hans Kovenbach, S.J. to dissolve all Eurasian national secular borders, and form the Mediterranean Union, as King Juan Carlos of Jerusalem's crown jewel, at the hilt of the neo Babylonian Caliphate scimitar Arc of Crisis swath from Thailand to Morocco, hewn by their crown prince SOEBARKAH - Obama 7 3-5005-OP fealty "There is no other God than A//ah!' (I2) allegiance to the Opus Dei Muslim Brotherhood - GULEN 1 EU Utopian Islamic Fascist Alliance (UIFA) to transform United States national sovereignty by plundering our youth by war and burden We the Peop/e de jure Citizens and Public Debtor 1 U.S. Taxpayer $43 trillion Dollars wealth by theft. 24. Petitioner has suffered unreasonable denial of due process requiring a trial of the newly discovered facts in that the matter of civil fraud complained of inextricably intertwined with criminal matters under both state and the federal statute, that a legitimate effort of any prosecution or civil inquiry must prove the following elements to obtain a misprision of felony conviction: (1) another person actually committed a felony; (2) the defendant knew that the felony was committed; (3) the defendant did not notify any law enforcement or judicial officer; and (4) the defendant took affirmative steps to conceal the felony. 25. That Petitioner relies on the fifty year experience and judgment of law enforcement officer, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County Arizona, when on June 9,2012 he affirmed that a crime has been committed that requires to determine at a civil trial what precisely constitutes active concealment as a Quest& of Factwith circumstance essential for both civil and criminal cases quote: 7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama's long form birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number. 26. Further evidence that Petitioner relies on is that collected by Sheriff Arpaio's chief Investigator Michael Zullo affirmed by affidavit on November 12, 2012 in search of an actual perpetrator of crime affirms quote: 44. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computergenerated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website may have been imported from another unknown source document. The fact that the stamp cannot have been placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws is one of many indications that the document is a forgery and, therefore, that it cannot be relied upon as verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Mr. Obama's birth. 27.That the expert testimony by Paul Edward lrey is based upon the Affidavit with Exhibits A through D affirmed December 4, 2012, shown as Exhibit D-2 that is res ipsa loquitur in the above referenced State Petition 21948-2012; and that a trial of the facts in the matter of a felony forgery with expert testimony is an urgent matter of public interest with time of the essence and ongoing imminent irreparable harm; 28. That the Usurper under any standard practice or hiring circumstance in either State or Federal employment would absolutely not obtain a job!!. 29. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation in this Petition paragraphs 1 through 28 with the same force and effect at length but for brevity omits same and wishes that the Court grant an opportunity that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection and injured under ~ ~ color of state law as to operation of the USCA - A4S2 as to the 1 2 and 1 4 ' Amendments ~ for separate election of POTUS and VPOTUS without provision at the primary and general election equal with the electoral college by distinct ballot 30. The text of the USAC Amendment XI1 Clause 1 is as follows, quote: "The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and theyshal/makedistinct / , s of all~ersons voted for as President, and all persons voted for as Vice-President and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate." (emphasis by Petitioner) 31. That Petitioner contends that there shall be a distinct ballot for each political party committee candidate for POTUS and a distinct ballot of VPOTUS at the election and had there been the results would have been different on November 6,2012 General Election; that Joseph Biden was not as popular as Paul Ryan who would of won even though his running mate Mitt Romney would have lost; and similarly that in 2008 Sarah Palin would have been selected over Joseph Biden when on separate distinct ballot from the POTUS Candidate even though John McCain would have lost. 32. Further the 12'~ ~mendment express mandate enforcement is to guarantee by operation the full effectiveness of the 2othand 2sth Amendments to check an ineligible candidate for POTUS or VPOTUS that presently exists as one body, the NYS BOE, who together as the Democratic-Republican Party act to defeat the election process. 33. That Petitioner requires a mandamus of the NYS BOE and its subdivisions to effect compliance with the 12" Amendment for the primary, general election and electoral college selection process for the electorate as well as for the resultant winning elector slates to be thereafter given a distinct ballot for POTUS candidates and a distinct Ballot for VPOTUS candidates accordingly to repeat. C. 34. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation in this Petition paragraphs 1 through 33 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length but for brevity omits same and wishes that the Court grant an opportunity that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection under color of state law as to operation of the 12'~ and 14" amendments in provision of operation of the 2oTH and 25TH Amendments. 35. By operation of law John A. Boehner is next successor to POTUS. D. 36. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation in this Petition paragraphs 1 through 35 with the same force and effect but for brevity omits same and wishes that the Court grant an opportunity that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection and injured: declare the incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while holding an office of trust or profit under the USAC 14'~ ~mendrnent U.S. and as to USAC A4S2 regarding USAC A2SlC2. 37. Petitioner State Petition filed in New York State Court in Kings County with Index No: 21948-2012on November 14,2012 for a mandamus of the New York Electoral College as a state issue renders pendant jurisdiction of Federal matters to this Court Panel herein; and encompasses Petitioner request for a trial of the facts associated with the forged instrument issued by the Usurper on 27 April 2012 at a White House Press Conference with the intent that the forgery be used to again Usurp the office of POTUS for a second term as a matter that would each vote make the member an accessory after the fact to a felony sedition and treason with 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through 52390 and related law, "Article VI oath of office for honor trust or profit " versus Title 5 oath of office for honor or profit" ALL are under the United States 38. As judicial notice there are no Article VI oaths that can be found for any members of the legislatures (state or federal), or executive and judicial officers of the United States or of the several States. They all have United States Code Title 5 oaths. The President cannot take the Title 5 oath of office. He already has another oath to the people. He and others are deemed to be qualified ' To holdand enjoy any Office o f honor, Trust or Profit under fhe UnitedStat&. Notice that only individuals who are "elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services", are required to have the Title 5 oath. They do not hold offices of trust. The President does. Only members of the legislatures of the States and the United States, and executive and judicial officers, who are bound by the Article VI oath, can hold offices of trust. Those who take the Title 5 oath of office can hold offices of honor or profit under the United States. An oath is different than an oath of office. 39. FIRST The State Petition challenges all elected and or appointed State officers holding an ofice o f trust orprofifthat includes any member of the elected legislature or elected executive or elected judiciary and or any public officer holding anb Mice for profit for which the winning elector slate for new York at the 2008 and 2012 General Elections include such prohibited electors. 40. SECOND The State Petition, challenges all public officers holding an office of profit that includes any attorney, registered lobbyist, elected labor leader and or fiduciaries subject to public government oversight that the winning elector slate for New York at the 2008 and 2012 General Elections included such prohibited electors. 41. That Petitioner wishes a declaratory judgment barring any elected State officer holding an office of trust or profit, and or Public officer either appointed or licensed with fiduciary duties with responsibility to direct government oversight as holding an office for profit be barred in the state of New York and State(s) similarly situated and that U.S. House members Jeffries and Meng be declared as holding their office in conflict with their duties both as an elector 1 State Officer and then as a new House member also sitting in review of their own vote cast as elector in the congressional selection of POTUS and VPOTUS. E. 42. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation in this Petition paragraphs 1 through 41 with the same force and effect but for brevity omits same and wishes the court grant an opportunity that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection under color of state law as to operation of the 17'~ and 14'~ amendments in provision of election of the US Senator from New York without provision of the separate ballot for qualified electors at the primary and general election by distinct ballot according to the qualifications of electors of the State legislature most numerous branch 43. That the now certified U.S. Senate Election in New York as to the 17'~ Amendment challenge with jurisdiction afforded the Court by EL 16-100, in that the election held on November 6, 2012 is void ab initio and requires a new election by order of the Governor as to elector qualifications are not equal to that of the New York Assembly; and therefore, Petitioner seeks to overturn New York's U.S. Senate election with U.S. Const. Amendment 17 : "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The elecfors in each State sha// have the gua//icicaf/'ons requisite for electors of the most numerbus branch of the Sfate /egis/afures. .."(Emphasis added by Petitioner) as the November 6,2012 election for U.S. Senator from New York between Democrat Candidate Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Candidate Wendy Long among others was conducted for electors not meeting the qualifications of a member of the Assembly with NYS Const. Art. 3 Sec. 7: ". No person shall serve as a member of the legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United States and has been a resident of the state of New Yo& for five yean, and, except as hereinafter otherwise prescribed, of the assemb/Y . . . district for the twelve months immediate& preceding his or her election; ... or member of assembly at the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or alteration of the ... assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be e/igible to sewe as such, must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembh distn'cf is contained for the fwelve months immediate& preced/g his or her election. ..."(Emphasis by Petitioner) 44.That as for Elector Jeffries, Meng, Ortiz, Wright and Morelle in the Petition are prime examples of the electors of most numerous branch of the State Legislature that before the 17'~ ~mendmentwere to elect the respective U.S. Senator of two senators from the state of New York, as the Assembly had a margin of elector control over the State Senate with a ratio of 3 assemblymen to Isenator. 45.And as such Petitioner wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and afford the Governor the opportunity to set a special election, because a significant number of the electors casting their respective vote were domiciled in New York for less than fives years and had not lived in their respective county of domicile for at least twelve months and there is no way to determine from the votes cast on November 6, 2012 of those qualified what candidate was voted for. F. 46. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation in this Petition paragraphs I through 45 with the same force and effect but for brevity omits same and wishes the Court grant an opportunity that Congress and the state of New York show cause why the Court should not declare that Petitioner has been denied equal protection and injured: hold a trial to resolve that the suspected $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 be declared null and void under the USAC 14'~Amendment Section 4 quote: U.S. Constitution 1 4 Amendment ~ Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State sha//assume or pay any debt or objpation incurred the UMed States, or any claim in aid of insurrection or rebellion a~ainst for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obliqations and claims shall be held illeqal and void (Emphasis by Petitioner) 47. In June 2012, World Net Daily reported that Eric Holder's Justice Department has not investigated money-laundering charges in deference to bank clients of his Washington-based law firm, where Holder was a partner prior to joining the Obama administration; and then WND re~ortedin October HSBC was engaged in a systematic scheme to defraud citizens of India who live abroad out of billion of dollars in investment accounts, according to an Indian source who provided evidence. (http://www.wnd.com/2O12/12/ca tls-from-3-continents-to-criminally- prosecute-hsbc/#3dEiWszl1PQsEvHj.99 ) and despite conviction for money laundering by US Attorney Loretta Lynch of $1.92 Billion civil fines, the Justice department under Eric Holder has blocked criminal indictments. 48. That the trust accounts are deliberately wasting under the Usurper's control with his agents Eric Holder of the U.S. Department of Justice, Hillary Clinton and her successor of the U.S. State Department among others especially Timothy Franz Geithner and his successor at the U.S. Treasury as a key player of a racketeering enterprise, had previously assumed his position as the ninth president and chief executive officer of the New York Federal Reserve Bank on November 17'~,2003, also served as the vice chairman and permanent member of the Federal Open Market Committee, the group responsible for formulating the nation's monetary policy and determining the national interest rate and using his position from 2003 through the present facilitated the ongoing theft and money laundering of $43 Trillions of U.S. taxpayer dollars unauthorized by Congress with impunity according to the RlCO Statement of the class action / civil RlCO case 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML before EDNY Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein; see http://www.kcandassociates.org/pdfs/l11307429-Spire- Law-Federal-Complaint-in-New-York.pdf ). 49.That Usurper has signed 146 Executive Orders to date during the Usurper's Administration is to be compared as about the same as with other prior executives effecting trust funds. The Executive Orders are available in the Federal Registry listed starting January 25 2009 up to December 21, 2012 on http://1461da~s.blogs~ot.com/2009/01/current-listof-president-obamas.html#.UNtjg6D6rRQ ; and 50. Petitioner is alleging that there is sufficient evidence to suspect that the Usurper has invaded the trust accounts for operating capital otherwise to be safe guarded by the U.S. Treasury, bypassing Congress by executive order or otherwise, to gain access to the $43,000,000,000,000.00 for use by the Enterprise; and that as Congress, the Federal Courts, absolutely have an interest to fulfill the requirements of protection of Public and Private U.S. Citizens required under the 14thAmendment Section 4 of the USAC when there is sufficient evidence of insurrection, as herein exists, against the USAC and People of the United States- and as documented by the Levy Institute for $23 trillion directly. 51.That Usurper ineligibility and void ab initio acts as de facto POTUS Executive include those officers appointed by him since the wrongful elections under color of the 12th Amendment; and such officers effect the unauthorized use of $43 Trillion Dollars stolen from the trust accounts at the US Treasury for private use starting in 2003 from the New York Federal Reserve Bank without permission of Congress and or then Bush Executive reducing the use and surety status of the Public / Private US Citizen Taxpayers to moral obligation surety without their knowledge, and thereby improperly binding Petitioner as a Private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary back into a surety debtor status while wasting secured beneficiary organization accounts by the executive that conducted the theft. SUMMARY IN SUPPORT OF EQUITY RELIEF FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OF RESPONDENTS Constitutional Oaths are the foundational agreement behind every commercial and political event in the United States. It is primarily an offer made by the States to those who want to be part of the federal or national governments, and secondarily an offer made by the States to those who want to do business with the federal or national governments. This was a very dangerous document. It created a potentially huge commercial machine that had the power to do untold harm to the people. It had to provide a means to pay creditors so the States could be recognized internationally for commercial purposes. At the same time, it had to secure the people's rights, so the commercial machine would not eat the life out of the people. The only offers made back to the people to secure their rights are the two oaths required by the Constitution. These two oaths are the condition put in as ratified by the States, to assure the people who get to benefit from the Constitution by holding offices, keep their commercial machine away from the people in the several States. One is the oath required in Article VI of members of the legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers of the United States and of the several States. Even were Mr. OBAMA a private US citizen himself, he nevertheless when not NBC eligible may not be the POTUS bankruptcy trustee. That Mr. OBAMA with a legal father that is a British subject is not eligible for office of POTUS by his own admission against interest under American common law that shall not be conflated with British common law jus soli, and the Usurper is in dishonor with Agent private U.S. Citizen rights who is entitled declaratory relief. That even were Mr. OBAMA eligible for POTUS under American law, were born in the country of citizen parents, Petitioner I Agent would still be entitled to relief given the failure of any State with the 12'~ Amendment to provide a distinct ballot at the Primary and General Elections one for the set of POTUS candidates and one set for VPOTUS candidates as it had done for the winning electors - Both Mr. OBAMA and MR. BIDEN are improperly elected. and incapacitated to act requiring by operation of the 2othAnd 25th Amendments a finding of this court. Petitioner wishes relief barring any State or Public officer holding an office of trust or profit from an electoral college of any State similarly situated, and House members Jeffries and Meng with Kirsten Gillibrand are in conflict with their duties, see Powell v. McCormack 395 U.S. 486, 539, 550 (1 969) and Nkon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224,237 (1993). The Court must declare that neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. And that Petitioner deserves such other and different relief until this matter is resolved including the opportunity for sur-reply and oral argument. That this Petition has a total of 7573 words including footnotes, and uses Microsoft San Serif type in 14 pica for the brief and 14 pica in footnotes. The facts stated in the Petition are true to my own personal knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters 1 believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge, except as to those stated upon information and belief, which I believe to be true. Sworn to before me this the \, r * day of May 2013 NOTARY PUBLIC KAFJiAL P SON! Notary Pubitc, Siaie of New York No. 01 SO6039949 Oua11tit.dIn K~ngs Codi~ry Coinm~ss~on Expiles March 31, 2015 8 - ' - - - U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia IN RE Christopher Earl Strunk Petition for Mandamus CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On October 1, 2013, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC §1746, caused the service of a copy of the Petitioner’s Emergency Motion to reargue en banc the September 20, 2013 Per Curiam Order of Circuit Judges Garland, Chief Judge, and Henderson and Brown, in the Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus and equity relief from the State of New York and Congress with supporting declaration and exhibits affirmed September 30, 2013 as a complete set of which each placed in a sealed folder properly addressed with proper postage served by USPS mail upon : R. Craig Lawrence U.S. Attorney's Office (USA) Civil Division 555 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20530 Hon. Irvin B. Nathan Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia 441 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Office of the NYS Attorney General Joshua Pepper NYS Assist. A.G. 120 Broadway 24th Floor New York, New York 10271 Hon. Eric M. Thorson Inspector General of the United States Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington D.C. 20220 I do declare and certify under penalty of perjury: Dated: October 1, 2013 Brooklyn, New York _________________________ Christopher- Earl : Strunk © in esse Sui juris agent 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - #281 Brooklyn., New York 11238 (845) 901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws PETITIONER Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, New York 11238 Cell-845-901-6767; chris@strunk.ws RESPONDENTS The Honorable Irvin B. Nathan Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia 441 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 The Honorable Karen L. Haas Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Capitol, Room H154, Washington, DC 20515–6601 John A. Boehner Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives 1011 Longworth H.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 Senator Mitch McConnell United States Senate 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-1702 Senator Harry Reid United States Senate 522 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-2803 Senator Charles E. Schumer United States Senate 322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510-3201 Senator Kirsten Gillibrand United States Senate Washington, D.C. Office: 478 Russell Senate Office Building, District of Columbia 20510-3204 Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. President of the U.S. Senate c/o the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500; Barack Obama c/o the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500; Andrew Cuomo Governor of New York State The New York State Capitol Albany, New York 12224 Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 1 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 27. 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Steven C. Farkas, Esq. of COLLERAN, O’HARA & MILLS, L.L.P. Representing Mario Cilento 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 450 Garden City, New York 11530 Joshua Pepper NYS Assist. A.G. Office of the NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway 24th Floor New York, New York 10171 AFFIDAVIT: In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS A. Stay New York State Justices in the matter of their denial of Petitioner due process and equal treatment due under the 14th Amt. of the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- a Quo Warranto matter; B. The Governor of New York for a NEW U.S. Senate Election in New York to comply with the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution C. The Clerk and Speaker of the U.S. House with Majority / Minority Leaders and President of the U.S. Senate respond to the incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amt United States and Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2S1C2); D. Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th, 25th amendments and U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) Barack Hussein Obama II should be eligible to take the oath of office of POTUS January 20, 2013; E. Congress barring the New York Electoral College vote for Barack Obama. F. Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void under the 14th Amendment Section 4; Exhibit A: “Public” U.S. Citizen on January 23, 2009 duly fired Barack Hussein Obama II for being ineligible for POTUS under A2S1C5 Exhibit B: non-surety “Private” natural-born U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary filing with notice to US Treasury Exhibit C: Notice of Petition with Petition filied in NYS Supreme Court County of Kings with Index No.: 21948-2012 Exhibit D: Note of Issue with Certificate of Readiness for Trial Exhibit E: Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Petition - Index No.: 21948-2012 Exhibit F: Decision and Order to dismiss Complaint - Index No.: 6500-2011 Exhibit G: Proposed OSC for the Petition - Index No.: 21948-2012 Exhibit H: official Court docket for the Petition - Index No.: 21948-2012 Exhibit I: June 9, 2012 Affidavit of Sheriff Arpaio of Maricopa County AZ. Exhibit J: November 12, 2012 Affidavit of Michael Zullo Investigator Exhibit K: Decision and Orders in the USDC DC case no.: 2010-cv-00486 Exhibit L: February 2012 report by Jerome Corsi on HSBC $$ Laundering Exhibit M: December 2012 report by Reuters on HSBC $1.9 Bil. Fine Exhibit N: Press Release regarding Spire Group RICO case filing in EDNY Exhibit O: List of Obama Executive Orders PDF available at : http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ Table of Authorities (abbreviated) U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2 states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.” United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” U.S. Constitution Article 4 full faith and credit provisions U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. US Constitution Amendments; 12th, 20th, 25th as to POTUS the Declaration of Independence of 1776 that adopted as the foundation for the respective States’ constitutions, including that of New York on April 20, 1777, Federal Authorities FRAP Rule §21 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 92 S. Ct. 2646, 33 L. Ed. 2d 626 [1972], quoting WILLIAM BLACKSTONE McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995). Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162 (1875) U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 289 (1814) Inglis v. Sailors’ Snug Harbor, 28 U.S. 99 (1830) and Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242, 245 (1830) Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857). Ex parte Reynolds, 20 F.Cas. 582, 5 Dill. 394, No. 11,719 (C.C.W.D.Ark 1879) United States v. Ward, 42 F.320 (C.C.S.D.Cal. 1890). Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1872), Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884), Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939) Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163 (1964). New York State Authorities N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 Matter of Smith v Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39, 43 [1943]). People ex rel. Ryan v Green, 58 NY 295,304-05 [1874]; O’Malley v Macejka, 44 NY2d 530,535 [19781; Matter of Dupras v County of Clinton, 213 AD2d 952,953 [1995]; Matter of Dykeman v Symonds, 54 AD2d 159, 162 [1976]; Fauci v Lee, 38 Misc. 2d 564,567 [1963], affd. 19 AD2d 777 [1963]). AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF KINGS ) I, Christopher–Earl : Strunk © in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say: 1. Petitioner Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse self represented without an attorney, is a duly registered voter of the 64th Election District of the 57th Assembly District (AD) and within the New York 8th U.S. House District at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue – 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 for ten years with email: chris@strunk.ws and cell phone 845-901-6767, and is an enrolled member of the Republican Party who participated at the November 6, 2012 General Election there voted entirely for the Republican Party line of candidates, electors of Mitt Romney for President of the United States (POTUS) and Wendy Long for US Senate from New York.. 2. As a matter of Judicial Notice there is controlling history and law regarding construction of the Declaration of Independence of 1776 that was adopted as the foundation for the respective States’ constitutions, including that of New York on April 20, 1777, that the Revolution expressly eliminated the feudal doctrine of perpetual allegiance, or that condition based upon a person’s soil birthright subjugation as property of an absolute sovereign, and http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 1 of 50 3. That the Founders replaced perpetual allegiance with the human natural law doctrine of Natural Born Citizen inheritance of allegiance from his parents and or that of the father; and that the Usurper’s Courts in which Petitioner petitions revert to the prior perpetual allegiance as if the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution were to amend the A2S1C5 (1) “natural-born Citizen” clause by conflating the term person born on soil as if a U.S. Citizen without regard to the status of the parents, and as if “subject to the jurisdiction” were needless repetition- there is no “birthright citizenship” per se; and with this in mind, by admission Barack Hussein Obama II at the time of his birth, his father was a British subject married to Stanley Ann Dunham a minor aged U.S. Citizen in February 1961. 4. That Petitioner when as “Public” U.S. Citizen on January 23, 2009 duly fired Barack Hussein Obama II (hereinafter known as the “Usurper” and or “SOEBARKAH”) when Obama offered his oath on January 20, 2009 as if eligible under A2S1C5 for the office of the POTUS executive with power of attorney over accounts with the U.S. Treasury and other executive duties (see Exhibit A), when in fact Obama is ineligible and his every act is void in ab initio; and notwithstanding all his acts being void ab initio the office of POTUS is again about to be usurped to Petitioner’s detriment and injury; and 5. That Petitioner, by special appearance of Christopher- Earl: Strunk in 1 United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 2 of 50 esse, now is a non-surety “Private” natural-born U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary, who on October 15, 2012 duly filed a Notice of Release without Consideration that under U.S. Constitution Article 4 full faith and credit provisions is binding upon the State of New York and its New York County subdivision within the city of New York to relieve it of further obligation as the trustee-owner of the Usufruct debtor organized on January 24, 1947; and that as of December 12, 2012 Petitioner subsequent to filing his “Uniform Commercial Code” form UCC-1 Initial Financial Statement is the secured beneficiary of the Usufruct as had been previously noticed in November 2009 to Timothy Franz Geithner of the U.S. Treasury with pending filings to the Treasury and IRS (see Exhibit B); 6. That as background to this petition original proceeding petition for a writ of mandamus of the State and Federal respondents, in January 1999 Petitioner started a series of court cases challenging the obvious corruption of persons with the Democratic and Republican Party who colluded to among other things fixed the 2008 election of POTUS along with a very long list of persons and organizations, that constitute by formal definition “the enterprise” that now act with the Usurper to suspend the U.S. Constitution in order to limit individual freedom and liberty and coordinate a $43 Trillion Dollars theft. • Petitioner USDC EDNY case Strunk v Congress 99-cv-2168 (1999) Challenged the “Capping” of the numbers of seats in Congress that diminishes voter suffrage; Petitioner USDC EDNY case Strunk v US HUD 99-cv-6480 (1999) Challenged the taking of his property by conversion and . • http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 3 of 50 • Petitioner USDC EDNY case Strunk v Congress 00-cv-7177 (2000) Challenged the New York State Legislature arbitrary basis for the 2000 Electoral College under A2S1C2 Petitioner EDNY Case Thomas et al. v Federal Reserve Bank of NY et al. 07-cv-1171 (2007) Challenged the pump and dump conversion of real property in Bed Stuy. Brooklyn by HUD connected speculators using sub-prime instruments Petitioner USDC EDNY case Strunk v CIA 08-cv-1196 Challenge the CIA under FOIA to produce documents for deceased Jesuit, Fr. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin S.J.– father of the new age movement and the PRC; Petitioner case USDC EDNY Strunk v. NY SOS 08-cv-4289 Challenged the 2008 NY Electoral College as Public Officers holding two jobs for pay. Petitioner NYS case Strunk v Paterson 29641 (2008) Article 78 State Petition challenging the 2008 NYS Electoral College members holding two jobs for pay contrary to the State Constitution; Petitioner NYS case Strunk v Paterson 29642 (2008) State Complaint depending upon the law of the case from 29641-08 challenging their right to vote for an ineligible person for POTUS (active); Petitioner USDC DC Case Strunk v US DOS and DHS 08-cv-2234 (2008) FOIA request for the passport and travel records for Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama, Soetoro) and Barack Hussein Obama II – on appeal; Petitioner USDC EDNY Case Strunk (intervener) v ACORN 09-cv-4888 Intervener as a prior HUD contractor on the side of the US Government challenging the “friendly” nature of the suit as a fraud upon the court; • • • • • • • 7. That there has been steady growth of an “Enterprise” as defined by civil RICO standards since 1986 that has served as a vehicle to forward a huge theft of U.S. Taxpayer backed securities and obligations in use by the Federal Reserve Banking system that is backed by public and private U.S. Citizen property as if tacit moral obligation contract existed; however, the clueless US Citizen sureties were not afforded due process and equal protection when the enterprise began in earnest after the 1999 Clinton Administration elimination http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 4 of 50 of the 1999 Glass-Steagle Act protection to comingle risky investment and commercial banking activities; and 8. That in 1999 then HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo as the single fiduciary devised rules and policy to increase and conceal non performing loans for use by the Freddie Mac FDR era quasi public entity that has also assumed control over a huge number of real property mortgages as a result of the 1986 collapse of the Saving and Loan Industry then absorbed using the Resolution Trust Corporation and large commercial banking industry that in short was devised among Pritzker, Dworman, Annenberg, Ayers, Geithner, and other powerful families to further efforts of the enterprise to convert property and launder the proceeds with questionable securities and general accounting practices coordinated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York with members; and 9. In addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that the Enterprise’s present pawn, Barack Obama, when fully understood that Karl Marx’s spiritual mentor is Fr. Luigi Taparelli S.J. whose “Social Justice Doctrine” of 1832 is now the Usurper’s ideology of Utopian Islamic dualism, underlies his outrageously sinister acts since entering public office in Illinois; and of the acts, the Usurper is now clearly guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment, intimidation of witnesses and racketeering; and 10. That the controversy swirling around the Usurper’s eligibility for the office of POTUS since 2008 is the matter of his alleged Common Law citizen status as if a Native-born Citizen, somehow notwithstanding the allegiance status of his parents, rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 5 of 50 soil to married U.S. Citizen parents; and that nevertheless Barack Hussein Obama II is a British Subject with dual allegiance at birth alleged August 4, 1961 (we do not actually know the real date) wherever that birth happened, because in February 1961 according to Hawaii Court records the British Subject father was married to the minor U.S. Citizen mother in wedlock to a majority aged British subject foreign alien student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and 11. That then when in the mother’s custody during her 2nd marriage Barack Obama was adopted in Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen step-father, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name “SOEBARKAH” according to the U.S. State Department record affirmed August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and 12. Then thereafter, as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a U.S. Passport to live with his grandmother who: (i) obtained foreign student funding, (ii) illegally obtained a stolen Social Security Number no later than 1980, (iii) forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and now after the death of the mischievous grandmother, inter alia SOEBARKAH in furtherance of usurpation of the office of POTUS no later than April 25, 2011, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii and is the simple matter before this court for a trial of facts. 13. That inter alia Petitioner further contends based upon information and belief that notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances maybe as many as five (5) British, http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 6 of 50 Kenyan, Indonesian, Canadian, United States by oath of office, and despite taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, the Usurper levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies alQaida, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GÜLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through Morocco to replace the Ottoman Caliphate dismantled by Winston Churchill and T. E. Lawrence in 1921, and giving the enemies / Enterprise aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and that any candidate elector and or public officer who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason. 14. That based upon information and belief Barack Obama is the asset of the Pilgrim Society ( 2 ), Le Cercle ( 3 ), 1001 Club ( 6 ), ( 4 ), Commercial Club of Chicago ( 7 ), ( 5 ), Sovereign Military Order of Malta Council for National Policy whose powerful membership overlaps with the directorships in various think tanks, 2 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_pilgrimsociety01.htm 3 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_lecercle07.htm#The_Vatican -Paneuropa_network 4 5 6 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_1001club01.htm http://commercialclubchicago.org/ http://www.orderofmalta.int/?lang=en http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Council_for_National_Policy 7 http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 7 of 50 mainstream media, financial institutions, law firms, corporations, and far more secret societies hardly worth mentioning; that all covertly support the Usurper to complete the European Union -EU (Fourth Reich), as directed by Fr. Peter–Hans Kovenbach, S.J. to dissolve all Eurasian national secular borders, and form the Mediterranean Union, as King Juan Carlos of Jerusalem’s crown jewel, at the hilt of the neo Babylonian Caliphate scimitar Arc of Crisis swath from Thailand to Morocco, hewn by their crown prince SOEBARKAH - Obama fealty “There is no other God than Allah!” (8) allegiance to the Opus Dei - Muslim Brotherhood – GÜLEN / EU Utopian Islamic Fascist Alliance (UIFA) to transform United States national sovereignty by plundering our youth by war and U.S. Taxpayer $43 trillion Dollars wealth by theft. 15. Petitioner contends based upon information and belief, that the UIFA overthrow of the enemy of the Bedouin and al Qaeda, the U.S. ally was Berber Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi (June 1942 – 20 October 2011) since surrendering to George W. Bush in 2003, renders Libyan assets to UIFA with IMF control over the African Union by assassination of its financier-leader and now underlies the Crown Prince SOEBARKAH and Hapsburg / Pallavicini (9) family asset Hillary Clinton (like with the Rothschild – “Red Shield”) deal with UIFA Muslim Brotherhood associate President Mohamed Morsi and Mohamed al-Zawahiri of Egypt, sought with the younger brother of Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri to have Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, commonly 8 http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obamas-ring-there-is-no-god-but-allah/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pallavicini ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION 9 http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ Page 8 of 50 known in the United States as "The Blind Sheikh", released from Federal prison by using al Qaida to kidnap the "Ambassador" Christopher Stevens from the Benghazi CIA "mission" or CIA (Georgetown's Patraeus contracted) safe house (a residential rental property), where the Libyan munitions magic mystery tour still is underway for arms transfer to UIFA assets in Syria; and that the kidnapping scheme was easy to devise for the exchange of CIA agent Stevens for the Blind Sheikh, since the actual “U.S. Consulate” was safely guarded in Tripoli by the State Department Security Service far away from the CIA rouge arms deal mission agents protected by U.S. National secrecy in Benghazi; and 16. However on September 11, 2012, the best made plans for the attack / kidnapping by al Qaida went sideways due to the fact that two Navy Seals disobeyed CIA orders to stand-down and joined the defenders to kill more than 100 al Qaida attackers during the five hour fire fight that ended by their death, the Ambassador rape /death, the continued incarceration of The Blind Sheikh, the slaughter of Egyptian Coptics, Israelis blamed for the movie trailer, and the media coordinated support of the badly managed false flag cover-up by Ambassador Susan Rice, Secretary Clinton, Secretary Patraeus, Secretary Leon Panetta, and the Usurper UIFA Crown Prince speech at the United Nations. 17. That the Usurper on the September 19, 2012 appeared on the Letterman Show to reinforce the false flag Muslim protest of a supposed movie “Trailer” cover story, and that had somehow the unfortunate misunderstanding in Benghazi was merely a spontaneous reaction that got out of control by outraged Muslims to a anti-Muslim movie trailer produced in Hollywood that http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 9 of 50 had defamed Islam ( 10 ); a bold manufactured lie to cover the false flag attack / kidnapping on the “trailer” that in fact was produced by a Palestinian National, a Federal probationer from a 1999 bank fraud conviction, for the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas along with the Palestinian terrorist cousin of Walid Shoebat ( 11 ) that thereby involves Attorney General Eric Holder and the FBI in support of the false flag abduction of U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, gun running, deaths and treason, and perhaps World War III due to events spinning out of control in Syria! 18. That the Usurper’s actions with the enterprise are outrageously ignored by the State and Federal Courts, and that include the overthrown of legitimate allies of the U.S., the commission of illegal wars, assassinations of foreign and U.S. Citizens, and institutional tyrannical dictatorship by the executive by unconstitutional executive orders theft with impunity of the Executive, Congress, Courts and NGOs. 19. Undaunted by the enormity of ongoing crimes and obvious fix that is in, Petitioner after the General Election of November 6, 2012, filed a new Petition in New York State Court in Kings County with Index No: 21948-2012 on November 14, 2012 for a mandamus of the New York Electoral College before it would consider voting for the Usurper by December 17, 2012 (see Exhibit C) ; and therein Petitioner requests a trial of the facts associated with the forged http://www.washingtonpost.com/obama-us-consulate-attack-in-libya-notan-act-of-war/2012/09/19/8e5b47ba-021f-11e2-bbf0e33b4ee2f0e8_video.html?tid=pm_vid&reload=true%29. 10 11 http://shoebat.com/shoebat-foundation/innocence-of-muslims/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ Page 10 of 50 instrument issued by the Usurper on 27 April 2011 at a White House Press Conference with the intent that the forgery be used by the Usurper to again Usurp the office of POTUS for a second term as a matter that would each vote make the member an accessory after the fact to a felony sedition and treason as defined with 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 and related law, 20. That as shown in Exhibit C, Petitioner duly served a complaint upon 14 respective District Attorneys in New York, and therein each complaint Petitioner affirms that “there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25, 2011 forged public document is for the purpose of usurping the POTUS, and that were any New York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant would be an accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws…” 21. That on December 7, 2012. Petitioner filed a Note of Issue with Certificate of Readiness for Trial (see Exhibit D) after the Petition shown as Exhibit C was joined on November 19, 2012 before New York State Supreme Court Justice David I. Schmidt by application for order to show cause (OSC) that was there rejected; and 22. That inter alia Petitioner contends that by casting a vote for Barack Obama each such Respondent listed therein and herein may be charged with the crime of accessory after the fact of a felony committed on or about 25 April 2011 by persons as yet named, aided and abetted by White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, the President’s Director of Communications Dan Pfeiffer, http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 11 of 50 White House Counsel Bob Bauer, and Barack Obama who during the 27 April 2011 White House Press Conference, see the transcript evidence herein (see Exhibit D-1), all expressly presented a forged instrument to the People of the United States, a crime compounded by spoliation, concealment, perjury, tampering with the public record, intimidation of witnesses & other crimes; and 23. That a trial of the facts in the matter of a felony forgery with expert testimony of Paul Edward Irey is affirmed December 4, 2012 (see Exhibit D-2) as an urgent matter of public interest with time of the essence and imminent irreparable harm; and 24. That the Petition with Notice of Intent to file an application for OSC was served upon the members of the New York State legislature’s Electoral College body by certified mail with a return receipt request on November 14, 2012 and then by follow-up regular mail on November 30, 2012 (see Exhibit D3); and that the issues were joined by the purchase of an RJI on November 16, 2012 (see Exhibit D-4) and appearance of Petitioner and the New York state attorney general office’s Assistant Attorney General Joshua Pepper of the Litigation Bureau before the Hon. David I. Schmidt who for reasons explained in his order (see Exhibit D-5) thereafter declined to sign the order to show cause application, and that Petitioner then requested reconsideration by Justice Schmidt on November 30, 2012 with due notice also given to the Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. for reconsideration pending see http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771/. 25. The Petition affidavit in support of his note of issue and certificate http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 12 of 50 of readiness by CPLR §3402 shown as Exhibit D was filed in good faith for a trial of issues by December 14, 2012 with partial severance for the benefit of captioned Respondent electors of the New York State Legislature’s Electoral College and members of Congress before the deadline to vote by December 17, 2012 – now passed; and is now to be tallied in Congressional joint chamber after January 3, 2013 for candidates for the office of POTUS when the next Congress convenes. 26. So what does Petitioner reasonably expect from this humble Court? A remedy for each of the following matters within the jurisdiction and authority of this Court to resolve: for Christopher-Earl: Strunk© in esse, a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary with injury in re the criminal usurpation of the office of POTUS by Barack Obama’s ineligibility under U.S. Constitution A2S1C5 and related law, Petitions by this Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus FRAP Rule 21 Order of: A. Stay of New York State Justices in the matter of their denial of Petitioner due process and equal treatment due under the 14th Amt. of the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- a Quo Warranto matter; 27. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court Panel with paragraphs 1 through 26 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length. 28. That Petitioner wishes Stay equity relief of New York State Justices in the matter of their denial of Petitioner due process and equal treatment due http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 13 of 50 under the 14th Amendment. of the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- in what amounts to a Quo Warranto matter. 29. That on December 21, 2012 in response to service of the Petition shown as C and the Note of Issue shown as Exhibit D in the Petition Strunk v Jeffries et al. in New York State Supreme Court in the County Of Kings with Index No.: 21948-2012, Developer Andrew Farkas’ relative Steven C. Farkas, Esq. of COLLERAN, O’HARA & MILLS, L.L.P. representing Mario Cilento the New York Electoral College member from Nassau County made an appearance with memorandum and a motion to dismiss the Petition with sanctions with a January 22, 2013 return date (see Exhibit E annexed without sub-exhibits A & B: the Petition shown as Exhibit C, and order shown as exhibit F); and 30. That the return date for the Motion shown as Exhibit E is long after the beginning of the next Executive term of Office of POTUS when he is to take his oath January 20, 2013 begins, were Petitioner to not seek this forum for relief would render all Petitioners efforts moot; and would interfere as intertwined with Petitioner’s appeal in with Appeal case 12-5515 filing due by February 22, 2013 in the New York State Supreme Court Second Department Appellate Division in that Petitioner on March 22, 2011 had filed the complaint based on common law fraud injury case Strunk v. NYS Board of Elections et al. in Kings County with Index No.: 2011-6500 that subsequently on April 11 2012 was then dismissed with sanctions and prejudice (see Exhibit F); http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 14 of 50 31. The Order shown as Exhibit F bars Petitioner from further suing the named parties in the case with Index No.: 2011-6500 in their Official and or individual capacity without seeking permission of New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur M. Schack as follows: NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; JAMES A. WALSH / Co-Chair, DOUGLAS A. KELLNER / Co-Chair, EVELYN J. AQUILA / Commissioner, GREGORY P. PETERSON / Commissioner, Deputy Director TODD D. VALENTINE, Deputy Director STANLEY ZALEN; ANDREW CUOMO, ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN, THOMAS P. DINAPOLI, RUTH NOEMÍ COLÓN, Fr. JOSEPH A. O'HARE, S.J.; Fr. JOSEPH P. PARKES, S.J.; FREDERICK A.O. SCHWARZ, JR.; (the city of New York’s Campaign Finance Board) PETER G. PETERSEN, ZBIGNIEW KAIMIERZ BRZEZINSKI; MARK BRZEZINSKI; JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR.; SOEBARKAH (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Hussein Obama II, Steve Dunham); NANCY PELOSI; DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE COMMITTEE OF THE WORKING FAMILIES PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE; RÓGER CALERO; THE SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY; IAN J. BRZEZINSKI; JOHN SIDNEY MCCAIN III; JOHN A. BOEHNER; THE NEW YORK STATE REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE; THE NEW YORK STATE COMMITTEE OF THE INDEPENDENCE PARTY; STATE COMMITTEE OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY OF NEW YORK STATE; PENNY S. PRITZKER; GEORGE SOROS; OBAMA FOR AMERICA; OBAMA VICTORY FUND; MCCAIN VICTORY 2008; MCCAIN-PALIN VICTORY 2008; John and Jane Does; and XYZ Entities. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 15 of 50 32. That the Petition shown as Exhibit C does not name any of the above parties nor did Petitioner act in bad faith with the Order shown as Exhibit F. 33. That on November 30, 2012, Petitioner after Justice Schmidt issued the Order shown as Exhibit D-5 denying to sign the OSC application, submitted a Second Affidavit in support of reconsideration of signing the OSC application and delivered a copy to both Justices Schmidt and Schack (see Exhibit G), and for the information of this Court Panel Petitioner annexes the entire OSC application with the Exhibits 1 through 16, of which 14 thru 16 accompanied the 2nd Affidavit ; and 34. That Petitioner contends in the Petitioner’s 2nd Affidavit in support of an OSC that the Court erred in its Order shown as Exhibit D-5, quote: 6. That any person elected at the November 6, 2012 general election, including Respondents, are now certified as elected by the NYS BOE, and because Petitioner was unable to challenge the election in the precertification first stage that then would include the NYS BOE and not conform with the wishes of Judge Schack; but now during the post certification phase in which any congressman elect during the lame duck session of congress before those certified would appear to be sworn into office on or after January 3,. 2013 not only does not require the appearance of the NYS BOE, but as with any challenge of first impression regarding a Constitutional issue only requires Petitioner provide proper notification of the Office of the NYS Attorney General which Petitioner did by notifying Lisa Dell, Esq. by email on Friday November 16, 2012 (see Exhibit 15).; and 7. That when Joshua Pepper, Esq. NYS Assistant Attorney General from the litigation bureau, under the supervision of Lisa Dell of His Office, appeared voluntarily as an intervener at the preliminary intake hearing of this application before the Court at Courtroom 541; and thereat, Mr. Pepper disclosed that he represents the Executive including the Governor, Comptroller, Attorney General and Mr. Silver the Speaker of the Assembly; http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 16 of 50 8. Therefore how would Petitioner be held liable, and under what legal theory for another’s voluntary action applies, whether that be for an intervener as petitioner or respondent? 9. It is Petitioner’s understanding that he is unable to amend a petition per se, this is not a complaint, and even were a legal theory to require such duplication of effort, Petitioner doesn’t have sufficient funds to file a companion petition that for all intents is unnecessary, because Mr. Pepper did not appear by special appearance per se but announced to the Court he actually represents the Executive and the Speaker by name. 10. Why shouldn’t Mr. Pepper’s voluntary appearance representing those named be deemed as such without imposing further injury upon Petitioner for the acts of others whose job it is to appear without any further 14th amendment invidious deprivation of Petitioner fundamental rights too? 35. Furthermore, that by December 7, 2012, Petitioner received no response from either chambers and or the clerk’s office until Petitioner obtained an official copy of the Court docket whose caption has been modified to read Strunk v. “Board of Elections” rather than “Strunk v Jeffries” that Petitioner did not name the NYS BOE (see Exhibit H), and as such has already been established by Petitioner at paragraph 6 quote above from his 2nd Affidavit in Support of an OSC, that the Court erred in its Order shown as Exhibit D-5. 36. That the New York State Justices in the matter duly filed before them have without just cause denied Petitioner fundamental due process and equal treatment protections due, under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law, when they have unreasonably denied a trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- as a Quo Warranto matter; and 37. Petitioner contends that according to tradition that remains true, it was and is a citizen's duty to "raise the hue and cry" by reporting crimes, especially http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 17 of 50 felonies, to law enforcement authorities (Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 92 S. Ct. 2646, 33 L. Ed. 2d 626 [1972], quoting WILLIAM BLACKSTONE). 38. That Petitioner is an aggrieved private U.S. Citizen who has suffered property loss associated with injury to the Usufruct organization “CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK” that by grant of personal jurisdiction in the case 2011-6500 is affected by the enormity of Arthur M. Schack’s actions in the proceedings associated with the April 11, 2012 Order shown as Exhibit F; and as such Petitioner is entitled to seek redress of grievances expressly available under N.Y. Civil Practice Law Rules (CPLR) § 7202 entitled “Action by person aggrieved” Where a penalty or forfeiture is given by a statute to a person aggrieved by the act or omission of another, the person aggrieved may commence an action to recover it. 39. That Petitioner has suffered unreasonable denial of due process requiring a trial of the newly discovered facts proven as shown in Exhibit D-2 that would clear him of any wrong doing or bad faith in that the matter of common law civil fraud complained of as it is inextricably intertwined with criminal matters that under both state and the federal statute, a legitimate effort of any prosecution or civil inquiry must prove the following elements to obtain a misprision of felony conviction: (1) another person actually committed a felony; (2) the defendant knew that the felony was committed; (3) the defendant did not notify any law enforcement or judicial officer; and (4) the defendant took affirmative steps to conceal the felony. 40. That Petitioner relies on the fifty year experience and judgment of law http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 18 of 50 enforcement officer, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County Arizona, when on June 9, 2012 he affirmed (see Exhibit I) that a crime has been committed that requires to determine at a civil trial what precisely constitutes active concealment as a Question of Fact with circumstance essential for both civil and criminal cases quote: 7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama's long form birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number. 8. My investigators and I believe that President Obama's long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computer generated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website, may have been imported from another unknown source document. The effect of the stamp not being placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws means that there is probable cause that the document is a forgery, and therefore, it cannot be used as verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Barack Obama's birth. 41. Further evidence that Petitioner relies on is that collected by Sheriff Arpaio’s chief Investigator Michael Zullo affirmed by affidavit on November 12, 2012 (see Exhibit J) in search of an actual perpetrator of crime affirms quote: 44. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computer-generated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website may have been imported from another unknown source document. The fact that the stamp cannot have been placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws is one of many indications that the document is a forgery and, therefore, that it cannot be relied upon as verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Mr. Obama's birth. 45. The Registrar's date-stamp exhibited a similar grave anomaly, allowing it to be moved about electronically within the document - which would have been impossible if the document were the scanned and certified copy that official statements profess it to be. The Registrar's ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ Page 19 of 50 signature-stamp and date-stamp were computer-generated images that were imported into the document. They were not electronic images of actual rubber-stamp imprints inked by hand or machine on to a paper document. Accordingly, the document on the White House website is, at a minimum, misleading to the public in that it has no legal import and cannot be relied upon as a legal document carrying the full faith and credit of the State of Hawaii and verifying the date, place and other circumstances of Mr. Obama's birth. A photograph of the Registrar's date-stamp is exhibited and marked "MZa". 46. These and numerous other errors and anomalies observed after extensive forensic scrutiny of the electronic image downloaded from the White House website were inconsistent with features to be expected when a paper document is placed on the glass plate of a scanner so that it can be captured as an electrophotographic image, or when it is scanned and then processed either to enhance the clarity of the image by optical character recognition or to reduce file-size by file-compression or optimization. 47. Furthering the investigation, I returned to Hawaii for a second time. I met Mr. Duncan Sunahara, the brother of Virginia Sunahara, an infant born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961, the alleged date of Mr. Obama's birth there. Ms Sunahara died the following day, August 5, after breathing difficulties. When I met Mr. Sunahara he had recently applied to the Department of Health in Hawaii for a copy of his deceased sister's birth certificate. He told me the Department had gone to great lengths to deny him a copy of the original long-form birth certificate that a close relative is entitled by law to request and the Department is obliged by law to supply. The Cold Case Posse is compelled to consider the question why this little girl's 1961 long-form birth certificate was so disconcerting to the Hawaii Department of Health that it did not wish to issue a copy to Mr. Sunahara upon request. … 63. Notwithstanding this affidavit, it is plausible that an original birth record for Mr. Obama exists in Hawaii. Our investigation has discovered that at that time Hawaiian law contained a specific provision that permitted a Hawaiian parent of a child born anywhere in the world or any adult purporting to represent that parent, the right to register the child as Hawaiian-born. It is for this reason that two entries in the "Births" column of the local newspapers at the time do not constitute evidence that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii. They are merely evidence suggesting that a birth certificate was issued for him in Hawaii, and they tell us nothing about whether or not he was born there. In particular they do not - as the White House document purports to do - identify the hospital of birth. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 20 of 50 64. If Mr. Obama had not in fact been born in Hawaii, the long-form original birth certificate would not have stated that he had been born in a particular hospital at a particular time, and would not have borne the signatures of the attending physician and registrar. The newspaper entries would have been identical whether he had been born in Hawaii or elsewhere in the world; but the birth records would not have been identical. 65. The existence of this law permitting out-of-country births to be registered as though they were Hawaiian births is a further reason why the Sheriff wishes his forensic investigators to be given access to the original bound volumes of birth certificates for 1961, and to be permitted to carry out forensic scrutiny of the volumes and of certain individual certificates, including that of Mr. Obama. 66. For these reasons, it is necessary for the investigators to bear in mind the possibility that the intention of the Hawaii Department of Health in refusing to allow Mr. Sunahara to have a certified copy of the original birth certificate of his deceased sister is to conceal forgery and fraud within the Department itself. 42. That the expert testimony by Paul Edward Irey is based upon the Affidavit with Exhibits A through D affirmed December 4, 2012, shown as Exhibit D-2 that is res ipsa loquitur; and 43. That Petitioner contends in order to clear himself of any wrong doing as a 6th Amendment matter denied him by Judge Schack, that the body of the crime complained of has been brought to the attention of Respondents, the Courts and various district attorneys with authority and jurisdiction to further investigate to no avail, and that the testimony deals with the fact that in 1961, well before computers or such other technologies that may be in use today, that ANY birth certificate paperwork was done either by hand and or on forms designed for use with the mechanical typewriter technology that was then widely used, rendering a forgery detectible; and that testimony presents the proof of forgery in the context of then mechanical technology in use, and also http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 21 of 50 to prove the forged instrument is of current manufacturer, that the forgers use of the Unsharp Mask software by Adobe to create a Halo around lettering thus also sets the chain of custody of the forgery along with where it was manufactured. 44. That the urgency of a trial on the facts of a crime having been committed is essential to clear Petitioner, and is notwithstanding whether the actual perpetrator(s) or accessories before the fact of the forgery are before this Court as a criminal matter afforded jurisdiction elsewhere; and nevertheless Petitioner is entitled a forum under this petition for a trial of the fact of a forgery per se that the electoral college body as necessary public policy and law would become actual accessories by their vote, notwithstanding any matter related to the legal issues referenced above; and therefore, mandates that this trial must deal exclusively with the proof of the actual forgery now after December 17, 2012 and before January 7, 2013, and at which trial Petitioner will present expert testimony by Typographer Graphics Expert Paul Edward Irey who has his latest work published by the Washington Times on November 19, 2012 and then updated and published again on December 5, 2012 shown as Exhibit D-2A and therein Mr. Irey states quote: The important section of the Obama long form birth certificate is displayed below and enlarged to fit this page. We have found 24 proofs of forgery on this document so far and are showing 5 areas of our easiest to understand evidence here. We are 2 typographers with a combined experience of 70 years creating and examining our own documents along with expertise in scanning, graphic arts, photography, reproduction, printing, and also including the use of the old manual typewriters along with computer created documentation while starting and owning our own successful business’ employing over 70 people. Allegedly in 1961, a typewriter produced this document on a form, but http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 22 of 50 the evidence shows us this birth certificate was created last year on a Macintosh computer, sending two copies of that form to the White House. The White house then posted a copy online and gave zerox copies to the media that the source for our exam… We have found this birth certificate to be a badly done forgery. 1. Mismatched Typed Letters Compare these typewritten letters enlarged from the birth certificate. We have marked the ones chosen with a blue dot under the original letter. Of the 15 pair’s choices, one set is from the word “Student” that exhibits two different type styles of the “t” within the same word. These support our contention that the typed letters were copied and assembled from different documents. Note the size and shape differences. These letters could not have come from the same typewriter. This is proof of forgery. 2. The Bent Cap "H” in “Hussein” … 3. The Stolen Birth Certificate Number If someone decided last year to forge a birth certificate for a person, they would need a birth certificate number that was issued in the 1961 era. A baby born the same day in Hawaii as Barack Obama … died the next day. We believe that babies number was 61 10641. The family requested her birth certificate and got the short form with a number way out of sequence. They then requested the long form and were refused. They brought a lawsuit before the Hawaiian courts. Its was denied, with the court explaining that the Honolulu Dept. of Health could decide if they wanted to provide the birth certificate of the deceased baby or not. But that is not the law in the state of Hawaii. 4. The Start of Line Error The word “Kapiolani” should be exactly under the word “Male”, not a half space indented. This is proof of forgery. Also the fact that not all the lines are flush to the left is suspicious. No other birth certificate exhibits this peculiar style. 5. Irregular Line Spacing - This birth certificate form was designed for typewriters, so that every time the typist pulled a carriage return, it would advance down exactly 2 picas to match the form line for line. This was common for all forms made for typewriters. We were unable to find another birth certificate from Hawaii with uneven line spacing like this one. Typewriters do not do this. This is proof of forgery. 6. Irregular Letter Spacing - The original locations of the two-letter combinations below are marked with a blue outline. These are just some of the combinations that vary in the space between the letters. These spaces should be equal, not different, since the old mono-spaced typewriters always moved a specific amount after each letter was typed. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 23 of 50 We feel that the forger, assembling these letters manually on a computer could not replicate the exact spacing that the old style mechanical typewriters produced. This is proof of forgery. 7. The White Halo- The white halo, seen on the online White House release is a white outline around everything on the birth certificate. No other birth certificate has this. See it on Exhibit "A" below & Exhibit "B" showing how it should look. This was caused by the Adobe Photoshop filter used to sharpen edges. It does this by choking back the edge leaving a white halo. We show in Exhibit "C" how we did the same thing to our specimen example. The Hawaiian Dept. of Health is supposed to have put the original birth certificate on a copier and printed to a special green security paper instead of white paper. The only result possible from that is Exhibit "B", NOT exhibit "A". The halo proves that the forger combined a scan of the security paper on a computer ... flattened all of the elements in the file and then applied the Unsharp Mask. It is even on the birth certificate above ... see upper left corner. Since this is a direct copy of the birth certificate sent from Hawaii, that proves the white halo was on what they copied, so we must assume the Hawaiian original has it also. This is proof of forgery. 45. The Chain of custody of the documents from Hawaii to the White House is frozen with use of the Halo created by the Unsharp Mask program for Adobe . 46. That Respondent public officers as if Elector Public Officers and even when private U.S. Citizens act Publicly as the Electoral College from New York as an extension of State Legislative prerogative only, and have a duty as to matters of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 24 of 50 47. To allow a trial of the facts and issues herein is a matter of public interest is brought by the NYS CPLR Article 78 petition filed November 14, 2012, shown as Exhibit C, that was served upon the members of the New York State legislature’s Electoral College body by certified mail with a return receipt request on November 14, 2012 and then by follow-up regular mail on November 30, 2012; and that the issues were joined by the purchase of an RJI on November 16, 2012, shown as Exhibit D-4, and the beside a letter to the Clerk of the Court the New York state attorney general office shown as Exhibit G-2; and 48. Thereafter, the appearance of Petitioner and Assistant Attorney General Joshua Pepper of the Litigation Bureau before the Hon. David I. Schmidt who for reasons explains in his order, shown as Exhibit D-5, thereafter declined to sign the order to show cause application, and that Petitioner then requested reconsideration Arthur M. on November 30, 2012 with due notice given to the Hon. Schack J.S.C. for reconsideration pending see http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771/. B. The Governor of New York for a NEW U.S. Senate Election in New York to comply with the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 49. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the “A” Issues of this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court Panel with paragraphs 1 through 48 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 25 of 50 50. That Petitioner wishes an order of the Governor of New York for a NEW U.S. Senate Election in New York to comply with the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 51. That Justice Schmidt in his Order declining to sign the OSC annexed to Exhibit G sub-exhibit 5 requires both the New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, and NYS Board of Elections to be joined as necessary parties. 52. A declaratory judgment as to the now certified U.S. Senate Election in New York as to the 17th Amendment challenge with jurisdiction afforded the Court by EL 16-100, in that the election held on November 6, 2012 is void ab initio and requires a new election by order of the Governor as to elector qualifications are not equal to that of the New York Assembly; and therefore, Petitioner seeks to overturn New York’s U.S. Senate election with U.S. Const. Amendment 17 : “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. ..” (Emphasis added by Petitioner) as the November 6, 2012 election for U.S. Senator from New York between Democrat Candidate Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Candidate Wendy Long among others was conducted for electors not meeting the qualifications of a member of the Assembly with State Constitution Article 3 Section 7: “. No person shall serve as a member of the legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United States and has been a resident of the state of New York for five years, and, except as hereinafter otherwise prescribed, of the assembly … district for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election; … or member of assembly at the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or alteration of the http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 26 of 50 … assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be eligible to serve as such, must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembly district is contained for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election. …” (Emphasis added by Petitioner) 53. That as for Ellector Respondents Jeffries, Meng, Ortiz, Wright and Morelle in the Petition shown in Exhibit C are prime examples of the electors of most numerous branch of the State Legislature that before the 17th Amendment were to elect the respective U.S. Senator of two senators from the state of New York, as the Assembly had a margin of elector control over the State Senate with a ratio of 3 assemblymen to 1 senator. 54. And as such Petitioner wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and ask the Governor to set a special election, because a significant number of the electors casting their respective vote were domiciled in New York for less than fives years and had not lived in their respective county of domicile for at least twelve months and there is no way to determine from the votes cast on Novemebr 6, 2012 of those qualified what candidate was voted for. C. The Clerk and Speaker of the U.S. House with Majority / Minority Leaders and President of the U.S. Senate respond to the incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United States and Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2S1C2); 55. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the “A” through “B” Issues of this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court Panel with paragraphs 1 through 54 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 27 of 50 56. That Petitioner wishes The Clerk and Speaker of the U.S. House with Majority / Minority Leaders and President of the U.S. Senate respond to the incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United States and Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2S1C2) ( 12 ). 57. Petitioner has unsuccessfully expended efforts to obtained equity relief with Temporary Restraining Order of those State and local Officer electors with authority to act independent of the New York State electoral college who vote by December 17, 2012, and who are incompatible with the office held, be stayed from voting pending a trial on the facts of a forgery and permanent injunction with a declaratory judgment as to U.S. Constitution Article 2 §1 Clause. 2 by say January 7, 2013 now that the New York Electoral College Vote is transmitted to Congress. 58. Petitioner needs a declaratory judgment as to the incompatibility of any Person holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United States who are also electors that are to be barred from reviewing the elector votes as present in Congress after January 2, 2013 in keeping to law mandates 59. Petitioner as to the Petition shown as Exhibit C wishes a declaratory judgment as to the incompatibility of any Person holding an office of trust or U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2 states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.” 12 http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 28 of 50 profit under the 14th Amendment United States who are also electors that are to be barred from changing the eligibility of a person seeking the office of President of the United States qualifications are in conflict with A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 and are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the People of the State of New York according to the SCOTUS must be in keeping with the exclusive power, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), of the New York State Legislature in its plenary formation of the New York electoral college may not change A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995). 60. That an Elector as a Public US Citizen and or Public Officer has a duty to law and facts, and that when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty. 61. That it is a well-settled common law rule that a public officer cannot hold two incompatible offices simultaneously (Matter of Smith v Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39, 43 [1943]). This rule seeks to prevent offices of public trust from accumulating in a single individual. Two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the other or there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices (see People ex rel. Ryan v Green, 58 NY 295,304-05 [1874]; O’Malley v Macejka, 44 NY2d 530,535 [19781; Matter of Dupras v County of Clinton, 213 AD2d 952,953 [1995]; Matter of Dykeman v Symonds, 54 AD2d 159, 162 [1976]; Fauci v Lee, 38 Misc. 2d 564,567 [1963], affd. 19 AD2d 777 [1963]). http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 29 of 50 62. Those dual office holders that have an incompatibility "has been said to exist when there is a built-in right of the holder of one position to interfere with that of the other . . ." (O’Malley, 44 NY2d at 535). Where one person holds both such posts then "the design that one act as a check on the other would be frustrated" (id.).” 63. That upon a close examination by this Court Panel of each member of the New York State Executive branch acting also as an Elelctoral College Elector has a conflict of interest as each possesses the authority and power to prevent cronyism incompatibility of electors in the electoral college, but have failed to act; and apparently act along with the Bosses who hold the public and private U.S. Citizen enrolled party members or otherwise in distain, with the exception of two persons listed herein, refuse to allow private U.S. Citizens to take part in the mandates of the State Legislature delegated to the Electoral College responsibilities, 64. The New York Executive Branch Elelctors practice cronyism that grant political favors that are incompatable with the position of a member of the electoral college; and that Executive Branch Electors hold an office of trust or profit are barred from the body that has allowed lawyers, lobbyists, union leaders, licensed professionals, party leaders and other persons holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United States, and includes State and Local officers too. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 30 of 50 D. Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th, 25th amendments and U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) Barack Hussein Obama II should be eligible to take the oath of office of POTUS January 20, 2013; 65. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the “A” Issue through “C” of this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court Panel with paragraphs 1 through 64 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length. 66. That Petitioner wishes Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th, 25th amendments and U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) Barack Hussein Obama II should be eligible to take the oath of POTUS January 20, 2013; E. Congress barring the New York Electoral College votes for Barack Obama. 67. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the “A” through “D” Issues of this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court Panel with paragraphs 1 through 66 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length. 68. That Petitioner wishes Congress barring the New York Electoral College vote for Barack Obama. F. Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void under the 14th Amendment Section 4 . 69. That Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the “A” http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 31 of 50 through “E” Issues in this Original Proceeding for a Mandamus before the Court Panel with paragraphs 1 through 68 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length. 70. That Petitioner wishes Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void available under the 14th Amendment Section 4. U.S. Constitution 14th Amendment Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. (Emphasis by Petitioner) 71. That as further background amazing as it may seem for the Honorable Court Panel herein, Petitioner has provided Judicial Notice of fourteen years of Court Cases listed above that pertain herein that support a better understanding of the above allegations and controversy relief; and that here presented for 72. That Petitioner since October 2008 has filed three (3) State and no less than three (3) Federal cases seeking relief from the injuries caused by the Usurper, and each of which would have been sufficient to divert the Enterprise Argonauts to no avail, and that one such case USDC in the DC 10-cv-00486 was filed under seal before Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth who on January 11, 2011 dismissed the case without prejudice that since August 16, 2012 now unsealed dismissed with prejudice and as of December 12, 2012 deemed frivolous (see Exhibit K); and http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 32 of 50 73. As further judicial notice, on January 25, 2012 Petitioner as a historic bondholder of gold backed obligations ignored by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for repayment, filed a Petition to intervene in the case Kennan v Dal Bosco et al. SDNY 11-cv-8500 that involves the 2009 theft of $1.2 Trillion of New York Federal Reserve Bank and United States denominated securities (see: http://www.scribd.com/doc/79111728/); and that since, then the PRC has nevertheless been afforded membership in the New York Federal Reserve Bank for Red Army Banking investments by the Usurper and his agents, and alleged inter alia in the subject case the Usurper induced retirement of USDJ Richard J. Holwell and replaced him with newly appointed USDJ Jessie M. Furman, brother of the Usurper’s White House Council of Economic Advisors member Jason Furman; and 74. That Petitioner regarding the case Kennan v Dal Bosco et al. SDNY 11cv-8500 is directly acquainted with Leo Lyon Zagami, the documented facilitator in the 2009 theft of $1.2 Trillion of Federal Reserve and United States denominated securities, as well as his 2008 involvement in his role in facilitation of the usurpation of the office of POTUS with $16 Trillion transferred to Europe, Asia and Africa; and so done in conspiracy notwithstanding any resolution of eligibility questions posed to any court rendering the U.S. Constitution be damned. All of the Usurper’s cohort share in the largest theft in history as applies herein as a partial background to Petitioner’s involvement starting at page 518 of the record of the unsealed case 2010-cv-00486 posted at http://www.scribd.com/doc/101963433/DCD-RCL- http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 33 of 50 2010-cv-00486-EX-RELATOR-STRUNK-v-OBAMA-et-al-Quo-Warranto-QuiTam-Conspiracy-to-violate-civil-rights as follows: 8. In the spring of 2008 Declarant became directly involved with the multi-month trip to the USA by Leo Lyon Zagami, a high level Rex Templars member of the Ordo Illuminatorum Universalis (OTO) related to Queen Elizabeth’s Mother and the next King Prince William, then the acting Grand Master of Propaganda Due (P2) Monte Carlo Lodge serving after the death [sic banishment]of Licio Gelli and for the Jesuits (for whom Mr. Zagami had been trained in the Vatican Library from the age of 12 years) using esoteric Freemasonry to influence fund raising for the Barack Hussein Obama Campaign to ensure the vote for their asset in November 2008. 9. Mr. Zagami’s trip was in part financed by what he refers to on the Troy Space April 30, 2008 internet broadcast as “the Russian Broadcasting Corporation”, which is the unitary enterprise ( 13 ) All-Russian State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company (Russian: Всероссийская государственная телевизионная и радиовещательная компания, Vserossiyskaya gosudarstvennaya televizionnaya i radioveshchatelnaya kompaniya, abbr. VGTRK) is a state-owned Russian television and radio company which owns several television and radio stations. It was founded in 1990 in an effort to give the president of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, and its own voice, independent of the Soviet channels. 2 A Unitary enterprise is a form of a business in Russia and some other postSoviet states. Unitary enterprises are business entities that have no ownership rights to the assets they use in their operations. This form is only possible for state and municipal enterprises, which operate state or municipal property, respectively. The owners of the property of a unitary enterprise have no responsibility for its operation and vice versa. The legal status of unitary enterprises in Russia is defined in Federal Law No. 161-FZ "On State and Municipal Unitary Enterprises", which was approved by the State Duma on October 11, 2002 and signed by President Putin on November 14, 2002. The assets of unitary enterprises belong to the federal government, a Russian region, or a municipality. A unitary enterprise holds assets under economic management (for both state and municipal unitary enterprises) or operative management (for state unitary enterprises only), and such assets may not be distributed among the participants, nor otherwise divided. A unitary enterprise is independent in economic issues and obliged only to give its profits to the state. Unitary enterprises have no right to set up subsidiaries, but, with the owner's consent, can open branches and representation offices. 13 http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 34 of 50 10. That in June 2008 Declarant has spoken with Leslie A. Lewis the Grand Master of the Prince Hall Masons Lodge 459 in the USA through a former Cistercian Nun of St. Josephs Abbey in Massachusetts who introduced me in conjunction with the work she and I were doing with Mr. Zagami; and as to the chartering of a New Masonic Lodges, in which The Prince Hall Grand Master was willing to assist and did (see Exhibit D). 11. Mr. Zagami recorded his description on Troy Space in April and June 2008 regarding his attendance at Democratic Party events in his Grand Master capacity of the P-2 Lodge, OTO and VGTRK to influence attendees of various State level Democratic Party Conventions including that of Texas in preparation for the Democratic Party convention of BHO in August of 2008. 12. That Mr. Zagami stated on the Troy Space recordings ( 14 ) as done with Declarant in telephone conversations that his USA trip was protected and operating with full support of the Central Intelligence Agency, State Department and FBI for working with the militias at a high level, in which militias have given support meeting with commanders, that contacts at such high level were working with FBI; and that there are a large group of members, about 12000 militia members, in more than that 36 militias so far. That cooperation is coming into place in that the bunch of “corporates” and families not caring for the USA… The Plan is to establish a clear link to security contractors in various states and militias and deal with the gangs and especially those with weapons who now are following the wrong path to target the real enemies. 13. In June 2008 Declarant spoke by telephone with Clinton Torrez ( 15 ) who had provided security for Leo Lyon Zagami while in the USA and especially regarding Mr. Zagami’s security detail in the Midwest event that resulted in multiple casualties to the security staff including Mr. Torrez. 14. I spoke at length with Mr. Zagami in multiple telephone conversations including one exceeding three hours in length involving International freemasonry, the Jesuits and occult (hidden) matters involving the 2008 election. 3 http://leozagami.wordpress.com/category/leo-zagami-exclusive-interview-bytroy-2008-06-0507/ Clinton Torrez is formerly of the U.S. Army involved in securing nuclear weapons facilities and discharged with a service-connected disability. Mr. Torrez’s uncle is a very wealthy Mexican oligarch who owns a large Marina in Mexico on the Gulf of Mexico and involved in the Iran-Contra special operations of Oliver North. 15 14 http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 35 of 50 15. Mr. Zagami is involved with Fethullah GÜLEN ( 16 ) a Turkish expatriate in self- exile in Pennsylvania with an organization here in The Gülen movement is a transnational civic society movement inspired by the teachings of Turkish Islamic theologian Fethullah Gülen. His teachings about hizmet (altruistic service to the "common good") have attracted a large number of supporters in Turkey and Central Asia and increasingly in other parts of the world. The Nature and participation by exact number of supporters of the Gülen movement is not known, as there is no membership system, but estimates vary from hundreds of thousands to 4 million. The movement consists primarily of students, teachers, businessman, journalists and other educated professionals, arranged in a flexible organizational network. It has founded schools, universities, an employers' association, as well as charities, real estate trusts, lobby groups, student bodies, radio and television stations, and newspapers. The schools and businesses organize locally, and link into networks on an informal rather than legal basis. After an inquiry into the effects of movement's activities in Holland, Dutch Integration Minister Eberhard Van der Laan described it as "an alliance of loosely affiliated independent institutions rather than a movement." The Economist magazine described the Gülen movement as a Turkish based movement which sounds more reasonable than most of its rivals, and which is vying to be recognized as the world's leading Muslim network. It stated that Gülen has won praise from non-Muslim quarters with his belief in science, inter-faith dialog and multi-party democracy. Nilüfer Göle, professor of sociology at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes in Paris, who is known for her studies on modernization and conservatism, has described the Gülen movement as the world's most global movement. One of the main characteristics of the movement is that it is faith-based but not faith-limited. In several countries, there are Christians, even at the community leadership level, who feel close to or inspired by the movement. In London, October, 2007 a conference examining the nature and activities of the movement was sponsored by the University of Birmingham, the Dialogue Society, the Irish School of Ecumenics, Leeds Metropolitan University, the London Middle East Institute, the Middle East Institute and the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. There was a reception at the House of Lords. Mr. Zagami explains, "Abdullah Aymaz is the second in command of the Gulen movement worldwide and probably the second most powerful person in Turkey after Fethullah Gulen. He is the European editor of Zaman, the leading newspaper in Turkey, [which is] obviously in the hands of the Gulen movement." He then states, "Abdullah Aymaz is not just a journalist, or an editor or somebody important for his political role. He is a religious leader. People respect him very much in Turkey." Leo says that on behalf of Gulen (who resides in the US) Aymaz "controls basically the prime- minister of Turkey Erdogan and the president of Turkey [Abdullah Gül] who are these so-called moderate Muslims in the hands of the Gulen movement. This is the biggest threat that modern secular Turkey had since its establishment made possible by the great freemason called Kemal Ataturk." He says that, at the time of Ataturk, the Ottoman Empire was still quite strong and that "he [Ataturk] had to get rid of all those religious fundamentalists including the family of Fatma (Leo’s wife), the Suslu family [who are Sayyids] which was part of the Ottoman Empire Establishment. So Ataturk had to fight these people in order to secularize the state. Now after almost 16 http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 36 of 50 Brooklyn, and whose Jesuit handler of Fethullah GÜLEN is Fr. Thomas Michel S.J. who Mr. Zagami speaks of to Troy in the TroySpace internet interview recordings from April through September 2008 at length for about 100 plus hrs and manuscripts ( 17 ). 16. In one particular SKYPE transmission Declarant asked Mr. Zagami about the U.S. State Department’s journalist Christian Lovatelli Ravarino, a Member of the SMOM: [2/24/2010 2:33:22 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: Is Christian Lovatelli Ravarino the SMOM member who screwed you in Norway? [2/24/2010 3:40:48 PM] Leo Lyon Zagami: yep and also in Italy [2/24/2010 3:41:54 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: I am listening to your Late Night interview. It is very Good!! I like it. I never understood the snatch that put you in the hospital. [2/24/2010 4:03:38 PM] Leo Lyon Zagami: I hope you understand it now [2/24/2010 4:03:53 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: Yes [2/24/2010 4:03:59 PM] Leo Lyon Zagami: is quite clear in the last episode of the Night Watch a hundred years they have managed to regain power. The situation in Turkey is still under control because obviously the Military are still in control of people who know the danger of religious fanatics who hide themselves in the disguise of moderate Islam." Leo goes on to explain that the people of the Gulen movement, under the guise of interreligious dialogue, are in close but secret collaboration with the Vatican and the Jesuits. It is known that Abdullah Aymaz together with Fethullah Gulen was received by Pope John Paul II in 1998. The secret plan is for the Muslim system to stealthily substitute the faltering Roman Catholic Christian system as a means to keep subdued the people and maintain control over its lower level leadership. Leo states that "forty Cardinals have already secretly converted to Islam and have submitted to Fethullah Gulen." Gulen is the present head of the Illuminati Chain of Forty of Islam (also called the "Golden Chain"), "a chain that goes on since the time of Prophet Mohammed." A secret organization secretly in charge of people in the metaphysical realm and the geopolitical establishment. Leo explains that the planned secret takeover of the Roman Catholic power structure by the Muslim Illuminati, headed by the Gulen Movement while working hand-in-glove with the Jesuits will only apply to people in positions of power who are to secretly convert to Islam while outwardly still professing traditional Christian creeds. The masses of people will be allowed to carry on professing their traditional religious creeds all the while being impervious to the notion that their leaders are really cryptoMuslims doing the bidding of the all powerful Islamic-Jesuitical hierarchy. 17 http://leozagami.wordpress.com/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 37 of 50 [2/24/2010 4:04:28 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: You know I am fighting the State Department and CIA in my court suits in Washington now. [2/24/2010 4:06:00 PM] Christopher-Earl Strunk: I am rushing out to mail some court papers maybe we may speak on SKYPE sometime? [2/24/2010 4:10:33 PM] Leo Lyon Zagami: k 17. That the Court at this point must admit that Declarant has a unique view and experience in regards to the role of the Jesuits in the present chain of events ongoing in the world today, and that the history of the Jesuit Order’s ongoing and unbroken mission as militia to the Pope is to totally and forever eliminate remnants of the Protestant reformation to reinstall the Pope as the single infallible world absolute monarch over all matters spiritual and temporal bar none and are actively set to eliminate the USA that claims to have national sovereignty or alliance as a selfsubsisting singularity, similarly as with any sect, tribe or movement like the Shiite, Tibetans, Jews who believe in the coming of a single absolute monarch or messiah other than the Pope pose a threat to be suppressed. 18. That the history, hidden knowledge and occult matters of the Society of Jesus is a matter of national security for survival of the individual against the Jesuits’ communist collective here in New York and the several States and involvement in the FCA matter. 19. That in the context of what follows in regards to understanding As such Declarant asked Eric Jon Phelps to make the attached Affidavit regarding the Power of the Society of Jesus in Russia From Czar Alexander I to the Present to summarize the Jesuits’ manufacture of the USSR / Third Rome and Cold War now being revisited to destroy the USA today (see Exhibit E). 20. In the context of what is stated below in regards to Zbigniew Brzezinski and the campaign fund raising for BHO, the hoax of the Cold War is being replayed now with the BHO presidency, I subscribe to what Mr. Phelps states at paragraph 44 of Exhibit E: “That during the Cold War Hoax, Moscow served as a training base for the Jesuit Order’s world revolutionary socialist communists, including Fidel Castro, Michael (“Martin Luther”) King, Yasser Arafat, Jesuittrained Bill Clinton and indeed, president-elect Barry Davis Obama;” 21. Declarant also contends based upon my conversations with my friend Robert K. Dornan the list includes the KGB handling of John McCain while a prisoner of War in Hanoi, when He was sent inside the Soviet Union for medical treatment and programming is a KGB asset. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 38 of 50 22. That Zbigniew Brzezinski is both a blood member of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) on "the right" and of the Scottish Rite Freemason Grand Lodge of Philadelphia on "the left" working for the Jesuits against the sovereign interest of the USA; Mr. Brzezinski world outlook and agenda for the Jesuits that eclipses all other influences upon BHO. 23. In the context of the cooperation between the KGB/FSB, CIA, MI-6 and the Jesuits, Declarant in May 2010 attended the Obama / Columbia University Trial sponsored by Pastor James Manning’s Church in Harlem, and became more familiar with how Zbigniew Brzezinski used Columbia University as a cover while BHO was deployed from 1981 through 1983 to Pakistan and Afghanistan for the CIA accompanied by three CIA operatives. 24. While there in Pakistan and Afghanistan it is clear that as Zbigniew Brzezinski and his agents included both Tim Osman (a.k.a. Osama Bin Laden) and Muslim BHO who were all in contact with the KGB agents in the context of the Northern Alliance in relation to the Caspian Sea Oil pipeline development and other global intrigue. 25. That Zbigniew Brzezinski intentionally in February 1979 brought the Ayatollah Khomeini (Williamson) to power in Iran, in July 1979 entered into operations in Afghanistan prompting the Soviet invasion in October and is responsible for the deaths of 241 in Beirut Lebanon in 1983, now brings Islam to America through the Freemason Muslim BHO where here in Manhattan a 13 story mosque to be built at the site of the 9-11 World Trade Center by the sanctuary city mayor / usurper Michael Bloomberg. 26. Like Mr. Bloomberg, SMOM member Rudolf Giuliani worked with the Soviet / KGB / FSB mafia here in New York City that in one generation since leaving the Soviet Union jumped the line when Mr. Giuliani received a phone call after John Gotti went on TV and boasted he was “the Teflon Don” closed him down and gave the KGB full reign here to impose payback for Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1979 flanking operations. 27. That Declarant’s contention is that Russia, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Lebanon, Nigeria, Libya, Egypt, Dubai among other sovereign foreign entities and persons have illegally contributed to the campaign of BHO that spent $738,812,857 to get into the White House and 46% of the total money raised for all candidates in the 2008 Presidential Election that compares to three hundred and ten million spend by John McCain; and that the Vatican Bank was used as an intermediary for transfer of funds into its USA landing Banks that with the release of the banking records of the BHO campaign committee will show substantial illegal foreign involvement to buy the presidency as previously in the instance of James Riady of the Indonesian Lippo Group for Bill Clinton in 1992 was not convicted by the DOJ until January 11, 2001. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 39 of 50 75. As further judicial notice, in light of Petitioners discovery of the laundering activities of JP Morgan Bank as the landing bank for the Vatican Bank ( 18 )(now as of last spring assumed by Wells Fargo Bank), in February 2012 Petitioner called to warn Jerome Corsi in regards to an article he published in World Net Daily (WND) reporting money laundering activities of the New York Branch of the Hong Kong Shanghi Bank Corporation (HSBC) in which he exposed evidence (see Exhibit L); and in which a short time later he was injured when HSBC lodged a complaint that blocked Internet access to one of the WND stories, and as a senior reporter Jerome Corsi was fired by the New York City investment firm he had worked with for two years as a senior There are three direct Vatican Banking mechanisms used to channel money into the United States: 18 (i) The Vatican Bank number UID# 014780 BIC/SWIFT : IOPRVAVX a.k.a ISTITUTO PER LE OPERE DI RELIGIONE of VATICAN CITY in the VATICAN CITY STATE and for which there are seven (7) banking participants as the landing banks for international wire transfers into the USA and who directly benefited by putting Obama into office: 0001 THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON; 0002 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; 0008 CITIBANK, N.A.; 0103 DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST CO AMERICAS; 0108 HSBC BANK USA; 0256 STANDARD CHARTERED BANK; 0509 WELLS FARGO NY INTL FKA WACHOVIA; needless to say the Vatican Bank and the participating banks are generally owned by the Vatican through the Rothschild who have managed the Vatican asset since 1824 and keep that control tightly within the family circle even as far back as Alexander Hamilton who having married a Rothschild cousin setup the Bank of New York in 1784 that only after great effort became chartered after 1791 when he became the US Treasurer; and (ii) further, the International Catholic Union of the Press (UCIP) is used for the World Forum of Professionals and Institutions in Secular and Religious Media with the Address: UCIP, CP 197, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland and the Vatican name of the account holder: UCIP with the name of the Bank: IOR, Vatican Swiftcode: IOPRVAVX Account number in Europe: 16586001 http://www.ucip.ch/une/ib.htm and in which the Vatican Interbank clearing account in the US is with JPM CHASE MANHATTAN BANK NEW YORK Account no.: 001-1-97500; and (iii) further yet, The Vatican Bank: ISTITUTO PER LE OPERE DI RELIGIONE = INSTITUTE FOR THE RELIGION WORKS in which the Institute for Works of Religion (Italian: Istituto per le Opere di Religione - IOR) commonly known as Vatican Bank was formed during World War 2 and is located inside the Vatican City. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 40 of 50 managing director, Gilford Securities. (http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/callsfrom-3-continents-to-criminally-prosecute-hsbc/#3dEjWszI1PQsEvHj.99); and 76. Thereafter, In June, WND reported evidence Eric Holder’s Justice Department has not investigated money-laundering charges in deference to bank clients of his Washington-based law firm, where Holder was a partner prior to joining the Obama administration; and then WND reported in October HSBC was engaged in a systematic scheme to defraud citizens of India who live abroad out of billion of dollars in investment accounts, according to an Indian source who provided evidence. (http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/calls-from-3continents-to-criminally-prosecute-hsbc/#3dEjWszI1PQsEvHj.99 ); and despite a civil conviction for money laundering secured by US Attorney Loretta Lynch of $1.92 Billion in civil fines, the Justice department under Eric Holder has blocked criminal indictments (see Exhibit M). 77. That Petitioner warned on January 23, 2009 shown as Exhibit A of further civil action, Petitioner’s standing herein is established by his private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary status for accounts that are deliberately wasting under the Usurper’s control with his agents Eric Holder of the U.S. Department of Justice. Hillary Clinton of the U.S. State Department among others especially Timothy Franz Geithner of the U.S. Treasury as a key player of a racketeering enterprise, had previously assumed his position as the ninth president and chief executive officer of the New York Federal Reserve Bank on November 17th, 2003, also served as the vice chairman and permanent member of the Federal Open Market Committee, the group responsible for http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 41 of 50 formulating the nation's monetary policy and determining the national interest rate and using his position from 2003 through the present facilitated the ongoing theft and money laundering of $43 Trillions of U.S. taxpayer dollars unauthorized by Congress with impunity according to the RICO Statement of the class action / civil RICO case 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML in EDNY now before Senior Judge Jack B. Weinstein USDJ and his Magistrate Levy (see http://www.kcandassociates.org/pdfs/111307429-Spire-Law-FederalComplaint-in-New-York.pdf ), in re that complaint see the Press Release see Exhibit N; and that 78. What is remarkable is that Jack B. Weinstein upon assignment immediately recused himself because he has investments with several of the Defendant financial institutions, leaving pre-calendar phase matters in the hands of Magistrate Levy; and that I want to have this Court know that based upon my several personal conversations in the last 12 years I have had with Jack B. Weinstein over the years in EDNY when our paths crossed in the hallway, Judge Weinstein was never stuck-up, has always been friendly to me and initiates greetings - I have always considered Judge Weinstein an honest Judge, even though a big government Progressive – but then so was my father too, both are generous and thorough. 79. And were the Court to thoroughly review the incompatbility of Mr. DiNaopli as the Controller / Elector of the State of New York Pension fund system, who has sole signature power with fidicuary trust over the State pension funds and investment, he along with other Executives and Secretary of http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 42 of 50 State Perales, have power to investigate a felony for which each will be held liable as accessory after the fact; all refuse to respond to Petitioner’s concerns in light of the civil RICO case 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML in EDNY now before Judge Jack B. Weinstein USDJ as to the ongoing theft and money laundering of $43 Trillions US taxpayer dollars unauthorized by Congress (see http://www.kcandassociates.org/pdfs/111307429-Spire-Law-FederalComplaint-in-New-York.pdf ); and 80. That based upon Petitioner’s understanding and knowledge of the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and that GAAP follows an accounting convention that lies at the heart of the double-entry bookkeeping system called Matching Principle. This principle works as follows: • When a bank accepts bullion, coin, currency, checks, drafts, promissory notes, or any other similar instruments (hereinafter "instruments") from customers and deposits or records the instrument as assets, it must record offsetting liabilities that match the assets that it accepted from customers like the New York Pension Funds or United States Executive controlled Pension funds. • The liabilities represent the amounts that the bank owes the customers, funds accepted from customers. In a fractional reserve banking system like the United States banking system, most of the funds advanced to borrowers (assets of the banks) are created by the banks themselves and are not merely transferred from one set of depositors to another set of borrowers; and http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 43 of 50 81. As such in our New York system oversight of securities under the “Blue Sky Law” and shell companies registered in New York as done in association with the rules devised by then HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo who while NYS AG now involve his incompatibility with his present support of the Obama Administration with the other Executives use of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York with transaction that involve money of exchange not credit involving money of account that means that lawful money was and is or probably would be disbursed by either side in a covered transaction that in short involves Union and New York Pension Funds as part of the $43 Trillion dollar mix, just as Mr. McCall invested funds in ENRON; however, Petitioner is barred petition! 82. That Petitioner beyond the involvement of Eric Holder in the “Fast and Furious Project” gun running for which he still has not responded just like the Executive has refused to testify on the Benghazi attack, re-examining the events surrounding the January 8, 2011 shooting of Federal Judge John Roll killed during a shooting in Arizona that also involved an attack on U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. and U.S. Marshal for Arizona, appears more as a warning to Federal Judges from acting against the Executive actions involving the Theft of $43 Trillion US Taxpayer Dollars, and that according to a January 11, 2011 article by PAUL MILLER entitled “PERSPECTIVE ABOUT THE SHOOTING IN TUCSON ON SATURDAY WHICH IS OFF ALL RADAR AND WORTH LOOKING INTO …ONE … DID”, ( 19 ) Miller states: … Obama recently signed an executive order allowing the feds to confiscate 19 http://authenticallywired.com/2011/01/11/federal-judge-john-roll/ http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/10/14/proposed-government-401k-grab/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 44 of 50 all 401ks and retirement accounts. Our media forget to inform us of this fact. A single judge adjudicated that Obama did not have that authority and stopped the confiscation. Federal Judge John Roll … The judge, USDC court of Arizona Presiding Judge Roll, was shot and died on Saturday by a “crazed gunman.” The historical connotations are similar to Kennedy/Oswald in several ways. If I had a 401k and/or a retirement account I would convert such to an investment in a tangible asset made of metal. Either you get rid of it, or Obama will get rid of it for you. Either way I do not believe retirement accounts will exist in the near future. TWO … DID … I’d like to know why another question isn’t being asked re the Tucson massacre. Federal Judge John Roll –for Arizona–was killed. And yet he’s only mentioned anywhere as just another victim. Here’s the question: Why is there possibly no connection being made that about 72 hours before he was killed, on Friday, he issued a critical “preliminary ruling” against the Obama administration to prevent them from acting on an FDR Executive Order (6102), which allowed the government to seize personal savings when no proof of a crime was committed? (“USA v. $333,520.00 in US Currency et al”, Case number: 4:2010cv00703 Filed Nov 30, 2010). My first question was: Who was the actual target, Giffords or Roll? or both (conveniently at the same place)? While the possibility that Loughner was under mind control has been disparaged in the press, the knowledge of the existence of such a program, and known past CIA/FBI involvement in such incidents, why would there not be the possible question of a connection? 83. That Usurper has signed 146 Executive Orders to date during the Usurper’s Administration is to be compared as about the same as with other prior executives effecting pension funds. The Official Executive Orders as they become available in the Federal Registry and are listed starting on January 25 2009 up to date as of December 21, 2012 as published on http://1461days.blogspot.com/2009/01/current-list-of-president- http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 45 of 50 obamas.html#.UNtjg6D6rRQ (see Exhibit O); and 84. That inter alia Petitioner is alleging that there is sufficient evidence to suspect that the Usurper has invaded a pension & retirement fund for operating capital, bypassing Congress by executive order or otherwise, to gain access to $43,000,000,000,000; and that as Congress, the Federal Courts, absolutely have an interest to fulfill the requirements of protection of Public and Private U.S. Citizens required under the 14th Amendment Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution when there is sufficient evidence of insurrection, as herein exists, against the US Constitution and People of the United States– most certainly both the Congress and Courts are silent as to the Usurper’s records and lack of proof of birth that would otherwise for any government employee shall be provided wasn’t herein; 85. Petitioner also contends in regards to the mandatory requirements for any government official / employee and or contractor is to provide copious proof of all kinds that was not used to also vet the present Usurper in the Office of POTUS; and that as evidence of the most stringent requirements for vetting Intelligence Expert testimony by Pamela Barnett that Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background Check trial as shown in Exhibit G – 11; and 86. That the Usurper under any standard practice or hiring circumstance in either State or Federal employment would absolutely not obtain a job!!. 87. That if the above were not enough to consider, reflect on what is transpiring in regards to the United Nations Small Arms Ban Treaty signed by was offered at http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 46 of 50 the Usurper and pending an adoption vote of the U.S. Senate: Peter Lanza AND Robert Holmes both to testify Libor scandal. - The father of Newtown Connecticut school shooter Adam Lanza is Peter Lanza who is a VP and Tax Director at GE Financial. The father of Aurora Colorado movie theater shooter James Holmes is Robert Holmes, the lead scientist for the credit score company FICO. Both men were to testify before the US Senate in the ongoing LIBOR scandal. The London Interbank Offered Rate, known as Libor, is the average interest rate at which banks can borrow from each other. 16 international banks have been implicated in this ongoing scandal, accused of rigging contracts worth trillions of dollars. HSBC has already been fined $1.9 billion and three of their low level traders arrested. http://newsworldwide.wordpress.com/2012/...r-scandal/ and 88. Petitioner further was amazed to discover last year that in regards to his study of the CIA Operation Gladio and P-2 Monte Carlo Lodge involvement in that mess, the interim grandmaster of P-2 (Leo Lyon Zagami) had met and corresponded with Breivek in re : OSLO, Norway (AP) — A Norwegian court sentenced Anders Behring Breivik to prison on Friday, denying prosecutors the insanity ruling they hoped would show that his massacre of 77 people was the work of a madman, not part of an anti-Muslim crusade. Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/24/norway-shooter-anders-breiviksentenced-to-10-21-years/#ixzz2G6Re4T54 89. Petitioner contends that according to the RICO Statement of the class action / civil RICO case 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML in EDNY and as documented by the Levy Institute that Congress has not authorized the present use of the $43 Trillion Dollars stolen for private use starting in 2003 from the New York Federal Reserve Bank without the knowledge of the Congress and or then Bush Executive reducing the use and surety status of the Public / Private US Citizen Taxpayers to that of a moral obligation surety bond without their knowledge, http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 47 of 50 and thereby improperly binding Petitioner as a Private US Citizen secured beneficiary back into a surety debtor status while wasting his secured beneficiary Usufruct organization (shown in Exhibit B) accounts under the very same executive that has conducted the theft. SUMMARY IN SUPPORT OF EQUITY RELIEF FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OF RESPONDENTS That since 2008 much has transpired as a result of the cowardice and or corruption of judges and government officials, and all who refuse to enforce the minimum standard of law under the United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 mandate that every person seeking the office of POTUS shall be a “natural-born Citizen”. Why this is so? I believe it best explained above, as a well planned unfolding of a more than thirty year UIFA effort to transform individual ownership of real property under local State sub-division jurisdiction into instruments for conversion at a distance without judicial due process and equal protection, and with the intent that the fractional banking system would be strengthened by adding real property into the mix beyond the projected lifetime earnings of a Public U.S. Citizen who remains subservient with the surety to the State trustee of the Usufruct construct owner by the 1868 ratified 14th Amendment to conform to the authority of the United States of America forward; and as with Petitioner, any Public US Citizen may reclaim his/her Private US Citizen freedom and liberty guarantee status- known before the first World War in teaching trust law. This Court has an opportunity herein. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 48 of 50 As for a New Election for US Senator from New York, even Justice Schmidt in his order of November 19, 2012 shown as Exhibit D-5 found such issue of first impression tantalizing, but cloaked himself with the exigencies of Justice Schack. As for my request for a Stay of the State action with the Motion shown as Exhibit E by Mr. Farkas representing the AFL-CIO / New York Electoral client Union Boss elector as a fiduciary with close dealings with the Federal Government, Usurper and Enterprise, consider He and others named incompatible under A2S1C2 that warrants equity review for relief in Federal jurisdiction as even the Justices consider a Federal matter and whether they are right or wrong is irrelevant a stay and hearing on the merits is reasonable. As for the matter of New York State elector incompatibility after the vote by December 17, 2012 is finished, begs the fact that Mr. Jeffries and Ms. Meng are to appear on January 3, 2013 and review their own vote under the 12th, 20th and 25th Amendment process for office of POTUS on or after January 7, 2013 is a matter that properly belongs before this panel. for relief , time is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm and no other forum to seek relief Affiant respectfully wishes that there be an original proceeding trial herein with expert testimony as outlined in Exhibit D, that the State action be subject to a stay, that the Congress be ordered to show cause why the Usurper should be sworn in on January 20, 2013 that the $43 Trillion dollar obligation should not be deemed a nullity, and further and different relief as the Panel deems necessary for justice herein including Petitioner’s right to sur-reply. http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 49 of 50 That Affirmant has read the above and I know its contents as a n expert witness; the facts stated in the Petition are true to my own personal knowledge, except a s to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge, except as to those stated upon information and belief, which I believe to be true. Christopher -Earl: Strunk O in esse Sworn to before me this of December 2012 the &%ay - -- -.- - _ _- -- # __ x - :* .- . - ~ T A R PUBLIC ~ MARK FURMAN . _ . -.- -LNQTARYPUBLiC-STATE OF NEW VOK;. -. - . . . - - - NO> 01 ~ ~ 6 2 1 2 3 2 0 . , . Qualified in Kings County . -. My ~ommlsslonExpires October 1 3 . 201 2 http://www.scribd.com/doc/l17739292/ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING PETITION Page 50 of 50 AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit A AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit B https://app.sos.ky.gov/ftucc/(S(hxaufn55brzmmv450mfxdl45))/search.aspx Revised Article 9 UCC Search UCC Search Results File amendment to this UCC Return to search form File number: Filing date: Lapse date: Status: 2012-2614943-04 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 12/12/2017 4:57:28 PM A - Active ACTIONS Action Initial financing Statement File Date 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM Status Active - Filed online NAMES Debtor/Secured Party/Filer Debtor CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK OrgID: 03766 Type: BUSINESS TRUST Jurisdiction: NEW YORK Secured Party Christopher Earl Strunk Filer Christopher Earl Strunk Date Added Address 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn NY 11238 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn NY 11238 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn NY 11238 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM COLLATERAL DESCRIPTION Date Filed 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM Collateral Description THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE ENTERED INTO THE COMMERCIAL REGISTRY ACCEPTED FOR VALUE EXEMPT FROM LEVY -- ALL PROPERTY OF DEBTOR INCLUDING ORGANIZATION NAME, “CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK”. IMAGES Document Type UCC Filing - Initial financing Statement PDF PDF Tiff Image File Date Pages 12/12/2012 4:57:28 PM 1 1 of 1 12/12/2012 5:09 PM AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit C SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS aristopher-Earl :Strunk in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 1 1238 ? Index NO.: 1 LTL~%\\Z Petitioner, - -againstHakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 1 lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037 . Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street --New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY I0014 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 1 1 103 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road --Albany, NY 12208 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 , Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Ofice 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510 , Petitioner designate The County of Kings as the Place of trial. The basis of venue is the Petitioner's place to vote Respondent@). NOTICE OF PETITION To the above-named Respondent(s): YOU ARE HEREBY PETITIONED to answer the petition in this action and to serve a copy of your answer, or, if the petition is not served with this notice, to serve a notice of appearance, on the Petitioner within 20 days after the service of this Notice, exclusive of the day of service; and in case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the petition. Dated: Brooklyn, New York November 0 , 2 0 1 2 Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse, Petitioner self-represent without being a n attorney 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281, Brooklyn, New York 11238. (845) 901-6767 E-mail: chris@,strunk.ws To: Respondents as follows: Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 1 1th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 1 55 West 7 1st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 2051 0 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS IndexNo.: ....................................................................... Christo her-Earl : Strunk in esse 593 VanSerbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 2 L q 48 /20 1 2 X Petitioner, -against- VEFUFIED PETITION Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 FOR EQUITY RELIEF BY Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 I lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11214 WRIT OF PROHIBITION WITH Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G New York, NY 10025 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037 TRO STAY, INJUNCTION AND Christine C.Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY 10014 AS TO ELECTORAL COLLEGE Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11 103 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 PUBLIC OFFICERS WITH U.S. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 CONSTITUTION ART. 2 $1 C1.2 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 AND VOID US SENATE ELECTION Gerald D. Jennings of 1135New Scotland Road --Albany, NY 12208 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 205 10 -- -- -- Respondents. Petitioner, Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse, a non-surety private natural-born U.S. Citizen self represented without an attorney, as and for his Petition for a writ of prohibition with Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and permanent injunction with a declaratory judgment as to U.S. Constitution Article 2 $1 Clause 2 (A2S 1C2) exclusive power of the State legislature formation of the New York electoral college that under CPLR Article 78, the New York State Election Law Article $16-100 jurisdiction over Election Law Article 12 and related law as applies to twenty-nine (29) U.S. Citizens to serve as Public Officer members of the New York Electoral College afier the November 6,2012 General Election thru December 25,2012; and Christopher-Earl: Strunk's PETITION Page 1 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County that this Petition requests expedited emergency equity relief with a CPLR §7805 injunction with a stay of New York Electoral College vote due by December 15, 2012 until the Court renders a declaratory judgment on the issues of law under CPLR §7806 regarding U.S. Constitution: Article 2 in its entirety, especially Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 3 (A2S1C3) as amended by the Article 7 Amendments the 12th , the 14th especially sections 3 and 4, the 20th, and the 25th ; further, especially as to the U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 5 (A2S1C5) term of art “natural born Citizen” (NBC) natural law issue versus the idiom “born a citizen” positive law created by the New York State Board of Elections (NYS BOE); further, the U.S. Constitution: Article 3 Section 3; Article 4; Article 6; and furthermore, related New York State law and regulations as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation as applies with use of NYS Civil Service Law §105, and that Petitioner seeks equity relief on six (6) issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the misapplication and misadministration of Public Officer acts as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and Decision as a matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the Article 78 Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641, and Complaint with Index No.: 2008 29642; and also, Petitioner challenges the New York U.S. Senate Election as void ab initio with U.S. Constitution Amendment 17 and NYS Constitution Article 3 §7 grounds; and that based upon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, with imminent irreparable harm as time is of the essence and without another forum for relief, alleges of captioned Respondents and related persons as follows: 1. Petitioner Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse, is a duly registered voter of the 64th Election District of the 57th Assembly District (AD) and within the New York 8th U.S. House District at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue – 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 for ten years with email: chris@strunk.ws and cell phone 845-9016767, and an enrolled member of the Republican Party who participated at the November 6, 2012 General Election there voted entirely for the Republican Party line of candidates with Wendy Long for US Senate. 2. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served his COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A CRIME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST AN INJUNCTION IN KINGS COUNTY WITH DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter the “COMPLAINT”) upon the respective County District Attorney (DA) with jurisdiction over the domicile of residence of the Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 2 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College for a total of 29 members variously domiciled in Fourteen (14) Counties that are now duly elected without challenge on November 6, 2012, pending the NYS BOE final tally / canvassing by the end of November, all serve as public officer electors to cast their votes by December 15, 2012 and that then will be transmitted to the U.S. Senate President Joseph Biden in a joint seating of the new Congress on January 3, 2013 take their oath of office in the new Congress that there will select the next President / vice President of the United States (POTUS) according to the 12th and 20th Amendments of A2S1C3. 3. That the criminal COMPLAINT affirms of each Public Officer in each domicile therein quote: • [each] Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6, 2012 General Election for choosing New York’s candidate for the office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15, 2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995). That in addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack Obama is guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment intimidation of witnesses and racketeering in the matter of his alleged Common Law citizen status as if a Native-born Citizen notwithstanding the allegiance status of his parents rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on soil to married US citizen parents, nevertheless is a British Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majority aged British subject foreign alien student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother’s custody nd during her 2 marriage Barack Obama was adopted in Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name “SOEBARKAH” according to the U.S. State Department record affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a US Passport to live with his grandmother who obtained foreign student funding, illegally obtained a stolen Social Security Number no later than 1980, forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and inter alia in furtherance of usurpation of the office of POTUS no later than April 25, 2011, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii. That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GÜLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through Morocco, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and that any candidate elector and or public officer including … who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason. • • Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 3 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County • Based upon the foregoing subject there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25, 2011 forged public document is for the purpose of usurping the POTUS, and that were any New York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant would be an accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and rd belief are as follows: 3 parties, books and records, and personal knowledge. “ 4. That the respective County DA with jurisdiction over crimes of electors in each of fourteen counties are: P. David Soares Albany District Attorney; Robert T. Johnson The Bronx District Attorney; Frank A. Sedita, III Erie District Attorney; Charles J. Hynes District Attorney of Kings; Sandra Doorley District Attorney of Monroe; Kathleen M. Rice District Attorney of Nassau; Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York; William J. Fitzpatrick District Attorney of Onondaga; Francis D. Phillips District Attorney of Orange; Richard A. Brown District Attorney of Queens; Thomas J. Spota District Attorney of Suffolk; Gwen Wilkinson District Attorney of Tompkins; Kevin C. Kortright District Attorney of Washington; Janet DiFiore District Attorney of Westchester; and act independently of this civil action. 5. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78 PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter known as the “NOTICE”) upon the respective County District Attorney with jurisdiction over the domicile of residence of the respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties got Notice that stated quote: “Please take notice of Petitioner’s intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obama ineligibility able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?” Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 4 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 6. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner had a person not a party to this suit serve a copy of the COMPLAINT and NOTICE upon the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College Members for a total of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties individually as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 7. That Petitioner has been barred from filing any further suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYS BOE et al Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of contempt against Public Officers: • • • • Andrew M. Cuomo of 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 Tom DiNapoli of 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002 ; and therefore, such named Public officers are not included herein unless by leave to do so. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 5 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County AS AND FOR THE FIRST QUESTION THE NEW YORK ELECTION OF KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND TO US SENATE IS VOID AB INITIO AS THE ELECTOR QUALIFICATIONS ARE NOT EQUAL TO THAT OF THE NEW YORK ASSEMBLY 8. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 7 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that as and for the first question the New York election held November 6, 2012 of Kirsten Gillibrand to the U.S. Senate from New York is void ab initio as to elector qualifications are not equal to that of the New York Assembly . 9. Petitioner seeks to overturn New York’s U.S. Senate election with U.S. Const. Amendment 17 “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. ..” as the November 6, 2012 election for U.S. Senator from New York between Democrat Candidate Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Candidate Wendy Long was conducted for electors not meeting the qualifications of a member of the Assembly with State Constitution Article 3 Section 7: “. No person shall serve as a member of the legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United States and has been a resident of the state of New York for five years, and, except as hereinafter otherwise prescribed, of the assembly … district for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election; … or member of assembly at the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or alteration of the … assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be eligible to serve as such, must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembly district is contained for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election. …” (Emphasis added by Petitioner) 10. In addition to the above listed State Officers, Petitioner has also been barred from filing any further suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYSBOE et al Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of contempt against other Public Officers and State entities: • • • The New York State Board of Ellection and its agents The New York Secretary of State City of New York among many other persons; as such named Public officers and agencies are not included herein unless by leave to do so, Petitioner wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and ask the Governor set a special election, because a significant number of the electors casting their respective vote were domiciled in New York for less than Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 6 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County fives years and had not lived in their respective county of domicile for at least twelve months and there is no way to determine from the votes cast on Novemebr 6, 2012 of those qualified what candidate was voted for. 11. That Petitioner’s right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; are and would be infringed were the election of US Senator not held void ab initio and that a new special election held; and therefore, public officers yet name along with Respondent Kirsten Gillibrand of 15 West 26th Street, Suite 4R, New York, NY 10010 with her present place of business at Washington, DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510, as a public officer has infringed my rights and acted contrary to the law of the land with those yet named as each Respondent must either be sanctioned and barred from office and a new special elelction arranged for qualified elelctors as soon as possible. 12. In addition to the US Senate Election, regarding the POTUS Election there are five (5) categories of elector public officers who are the respondents herein that each of whom have separate and or combined issue questioned specifically as to each member of the respective categrory or jointly, and that based upon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Petitioner respectfully alleges a question of law issue as to the captioned Respondents within each category of those public or quasi public officers with fiduciary duty who were notified of an accessory crime in which each participates in, especially if their respective vote is cast as an elector are : a. The Electors who are Public Officers elected to Congress duty as to matter of law and facts. b. The Electors who are Public Union trustees have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts. c. The Electors who are Registered Lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts. d. All the Electors as Public Officers when notified of crime have duty as to the law and facts. e. The Elector private person as an Elector Public Officer duty as to matter of law and facts. 13. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7801 as to the nature of proceeding for relief by writ of mandamus or prohibition that shall be obtained in a proceeding under this article is made for a writ or order of prohibition, in which such reference shall, so far as applicable, be deemed to refer to the proceeding authorized by this article. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 7 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 14. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7802 as to captioned Parties of electors listed herein in part is in keeping with the definition of "body or officer", and the expression "body or officer" that includes every court, tribunal, board, corporation, officer, or other person, or aggregation of persons, whose action may be affected by a proceeding under this article; and that Petitioner contends that Respondent Electors have maliciously acted contrary to the prohibition in favor of another and where this proceeding is brought to restrain the Electors individually and as a body or officers from proceeding without or in excess of jurisdiction in favor of another, the latter shall be joined as a party; and that Petitioner understands that other interested persons in adequately represented by Petitioner actions herein by order of the court may direct that notice of the proceeding be given to any person, and may allow other interested persons to intervene were it not to prejudice the emergency nature of this action. 15. In addition to the above question Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7803 raises Questions that may be raised in a proceeding under this article that are as follows: AS AND FOR THE SECOND QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS HAKEEM JEFFRIES AND GRACE MENG AS TO NEW U.S. HOUSE MEMBERS AND ELECTORS WITH A DUTY AS TO A MATTER OF LAW AND FACTS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AS SUCH PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED ARE BARRED ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE REVIEW AFTER JANUARY 2, 2013. 16. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 15 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers Respondent Hakeem Jeffries and Respondent Grace Meng as to new U.S. House members and Electors with a duty as to matter of law and facts are in conflict with U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2 states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.” as such persons similarly situated are barred Electoral College vote review after January 2, 2013. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 8 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 17. Other than U.S. Constitution Article VI it does not specify the form of oath a Congressman is to take “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” and was a function of the respective state and federal law as in New York State Public Officer Law §10 requires every public officer to take and file an oath or affirmation prior to the discharge of any of their official duties and to be certified to the clerk of the respective body . The form of the oath or affirmation is set forth in Article XIII, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution ( 1 ) 18. That Petitioner’s understanding of the Decision and Order of Justice Schmidt referenced above is that a New York Electoral College Elector is merely a private person not required to take an oath in New York or elsewhere to uphold the State or Federal Constitution and as such may vote as a private person. 19. That Petitioner’s New York State Assembly Representative of the 57th AD is presently Respondent Hakeem Jeffries of 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 and pending the final tally and canvassing by the end of the month of November will also be the Elected member of the United States House of Representatives from the New York 8th House District 20. That Respondent Hakeem Jeffries intends as a House member to take his oath to uphold the State and US Constitution on Janaury 3, 2013, intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to review his own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 to do so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner. 1 NYSC ARTICLE XIII Public Officers [Oath of office; no other test for public office] Section 1. Members of the legislature, and all officers, executive and judicial, except such inferior officers as shall be by law exempted, shall, before they enter on the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of ......, according to the best of my ability;" no other oath, declaration or test shall be required as a qualification for any office of public trust, except that any committee of a political party may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any such committee, and a state convention of a political party, at which candidates for public office are nominated, may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any committee of such party. (Amended by Constitutional Convention of 1938 and approved by vote of the people November 8, 1938.) Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 9 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 21. Respondent Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 is a American lawyer holding an office of trust and profit and is a member of the New York State Assembly, representing the 22nd assembly district in Flushing, Queens, New York, and pending the final tally and canvassing by the end of November will also be the Elected member of the United States House of Representatives from the New York 6th House District. 22. That the Respondent Grace Meng as a House member takes her oath to uphold the State and U.S. Constitution before Janaury 3, 2013, and then intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to review her own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 to do so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner. 23. That arguendo re A2S1C2, “but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector“ use is still with the original meaning and intent despite the addition of the 12th , 14th , 16th and 20th Amendments notwithstanding; and that the original use before ratification of the 14th amendment considered each State of the several States was sovereign and not subservient to the USA in regards to the enforcement of the Bill of Rights applied to the Federal entity that was properly termed these United States not as now termed after ratification of the `14th Amendment (1868) became the singular United States, as each State of the several States became and now remain subservient along with every state citizen therein placed under USA jurisdiction per se; and 24. Further arguendo re original use of A2S1C2, “but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector“ includes any state officer and or public officer accordingly, and that the same meaning for “Senator” who was appointed by the respective State legislature before the 17th Amendment as the representative of the respective State is then and now intended to equate that relationship to every House member even though elected by State Citizens privileged to vote, and therefore also equates to every “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” too, and therefore includes every Public officer, in any state or federal jurisdiction, all except a private person per se; and. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 10 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 25. Furthermore arguendo re the issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the misapplication and misadministration of Public Officer acts in 2012 as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and Decision as a matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the Article 78 Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641 as a matter of the Federal Law of the Land A2S1C2 still un-amended is that the only interpretation of State law involved in the Order and Decision of December 5, 2008 by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. must be in keeping with the exclusive power, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), of the New York State Legislature in its plenary formation of the New York electoral college may not change the meaning of A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 at best would have to be a retiring public officer to serve as an elector but make any “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” after January 2, of the year following the general election of the POTUS ineligible and as such the member of the respective Electoral College is to be a private U.S. Citizen under Federal jurisdiction as an elector is a public officer per se who votes by no later than December 25, 2012 every four years and when the joint seating of Congress convenes on January 3, 2013 the next year and every four years thereafter until there is a amendment to the quasi Federal officer status of an elector means that without an amendment, no State and or Congress may change the eligibility requirements of a Federal officer includes the elector as well as that of POTUS with A2S1C5, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995). 26. A State Officer and local officer as public officers hold an office of trust, and that persons registered with a privilege from the State such as an attorney, union trustee, lobbyist hold an office of trust for profit. 27. That were Respondents Grace Meng, Hakeem Jeffries and or anyother person similarly situated according to A2S1C2 who are officers of the State while acting as electors and as persons holding an office of trust or profit to review their own vote in Congress after Janaury 2, 2013 and also be an elector would infringe Petitioner’s right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; and therefore, Respondents acts as public officers is and would be contrary to the law of the land as each Respondent must either be barred from voting or office and or if done be referred for criminal action. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 11 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County AS AND FOR THE THIRD QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE THE ELECTORS WHO ARE PUBLIC UNION TRUSTEES WHO HAVE A FIDUCIARY DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE POTUS ELIGIBILITY QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AND ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THEIR MEMBERSHIP AND PEOPLE OF NEW YORK 28. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 27 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who are the electors who are public union trustees have a fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to their membership and People of the State of New York. 29. That Respondent George Gresham is a incumbent elected President of 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college. 30. That Respondent George Gresham is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elelctor tovote by Decmber 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner. 31. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a incumbent elected President of the New York State AFL-CIO by the organization's Executive Council to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college. 32. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 12 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by December 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner. 33. That Respondent Scott Adams is a incumbent elected director of UAW Region 9 with Local 686 Local 774 Local 1069 Local 1097 Local 2300 Local 3303 to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 34. That Respondent Scott Adams is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a quasi Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by December 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner. 35. That were Public Union Fiduciary Respondents and any other similar representative similarly situated to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe Union member trust and similarly private US citizens like Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; and therefore, their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal from their office and or disbanning the respective union and return of alll union member funds. AS AND FOR THE FOURTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE THE ELECTORS WHO ARE REGISTERED LOBBYISTS HAVE FIDUCIARY DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ARE QUASI PUBLIC OFFICERS WITH A FIDUCIARY DUTY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE POTUS ELIGIBILITY QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AND ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 36. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 35 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who are the electors who are registered lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts are quasi public officers with a fiduciary duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 13 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the People of the State of New York 37. That Respondent Emily Giske is a incumbent government affairs specialist based in New York with extensive experience in Albany and New York City. She has lobbied for corporations, financial institutions, not-for-profit entities and local municipalities including Las Vegas gambling interests lobbyist to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college. 38. That Respondent Emily Giske is a lobbyist with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by Decmber 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner. 39. That were a Lobbyist registered in New York and any other similar representative similarly situated to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty. And therefore their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal of Respondents license, order fines levied under State Lobbying law, and crimnal investigation. AS AND FOR THE FIFTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO also are AN ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY NOT VOTE FOR WHOM THEY WISH BY CHANGING THE ELIGIBILITY OF POTUS. 40. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 39 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that all public officers holding more than one public officer job for pay excluding a commissioner of deeds or notary public with a fiduciary duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications are in conflict with A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 and are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the People of the State of New York; and Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 14 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 41. That each Elector is mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including that of office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995) as apply to each respondent below: 42. That Respondent Robert Duffy is the incumbent 76th Lieutenant Governor of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 43. That Respondent Keith L.T. Wright is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly from the 70th district to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 44. That Respondent Stephanie Miner is a incumbent 53rd Mayor of the city of Syracuse New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 45. That Respondent Sheila Comar is a incumbent elected Executive committee chair of the New York State Democratic Committee to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 46. That Respondent Joseph Morelle is a incumbent member of the New York State Assembly representing the 132nd Assembly District, which includes eastern portions of the City of Rochester and the Monroe County suburbs of Irondequoit and Brighton to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 47. That Respondent Christine C. Quinn is a incumbent Speaker of the New York City Council representing District 3 to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 48. That Respondent Ruben Diaz, Jr. is a incumbent President of the Borough of the Bronx in New York City to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 49. That Respondent Ken Jenkins is a incumbent Westchester County 16th District legislator, and was elected again Chairman of The Board of Legislators to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 50. That Respondent Steve Bellone is a incumbent Suffolk County Executive to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 15 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 51. That Respondent Felix Ortiz is a incumbent representing New York's 51st Assembly District to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 52. That Respondent Anne Marie Anzalone is a incumbent appointed Chief of staff to Representative Joe Crowley of the 7th New York Congressional District to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 53. That Respondent William Thompson is a incumbent selected by the NYS Governor to head NYC's Battery Park City Authority to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 54. That Respondent Scott Stringer is a incumbent 26th Borough President of Manhattan to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 55. That Respondent Bill DeBlasio is a incumbent New York City elected official, holding the citywide office of New York City Public Advocate to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 56. That Respondent Byron Brown is a incumbent mayor of Buffalo, New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 57. That Respondent Gerald D. Jennings is a incumbent mayor of Albany, New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 58. That Respondent Archie Spigner is a incumbent District Leader for the 29th A.D. - Part A, and Executive Member of the Guy R. Brewer United Democratic Club to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 59. That although the following public officers are being questionably protected by the enormity of Justice Schack invidious infringement of Petitioner basic rights otherwise protected by the US Constitution and 14th Amendment guarantees and related State law with an order and decision taken on appeal case 20125515 filing pending, the following public officers would be effected by a Court decision herein as follows: a. That Andrew M. Cuomo is a incumbent 56th Governor of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 16 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County b. That Tom DiNapoli is a incumbent 54th Comptroller of the state of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote. c. That Sheldon Silver is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly from the 64th district and speaker of the assembly to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded anyway to vote. d. That Eric Schneiderman is a incumbent 65th Attorney General of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 60. That all the above named Public Officer Respondents as the body and or its officers with the expressed exception of private US Citizens as electors that failed or are about to perform a duty enjoined upon it by the law of the land as to the requirement to conform to U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Paragraph 5 as to the eligibility requirements for any candidate for the office of the POTUS; and 61. That the named Respondents as the body and or its officers that proceeded, and is proceeding or is about to proceed without or in excess of jurisdiction to allow violation of NBC Eligibility ; and 62. That the named Respondents as the body and or its officers that proceeded, and is proceeding or is about to proceed despite the warning of the misprision of felony sedition and treason are to be referred for criminal investigation and removal from office under New York Civil Service Law Section 105; 63. That Respondent public officers as Elector Public Officers have duty as to matter of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 17 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County AS AND FOR THE SIXTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO AS THE ELECTOR PRIVATE PERSON WITHOUT ANOTHER PUBLIC OFFICE AS AN ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS BUT ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY VOTE FOR WHOM THEY WISH. 64. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 63 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who as the Elector private person without another public office as an Elector Public Officer also have duty as to matters of law and facts but when absent a violation of law may vote for whom they wish. 65. That Respondent Irene Stein is a candidate past super delegate in the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination and wife of Peter Stein the Tomkins County legislator for the 11th District to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 66. That Respondent Walter Cooper is a candidate in an individual capacity as a citizen of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 67. The Elector private person as a US Citizen without another public office as an Elector Public Officer also have duty as to matter of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty. WHEREFORE, Petitioner wishes a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction hearing, and Declaratory judgment under CPLR §7806 and permanent injunction against the Respondents of each category and such other relief as the Court deems just including a TRO Order: a. A hearing on the legal issues as to the void ab initio US Senate Election in New York.. b. A hearing on the issues of facts as to forgery, sedition and treason. c. A hearing on the issues of the actual historical meaning of Natural Born Citizen held by the State of New York from before and after the 1776 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 18 of 20 ' 4 ' L Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County d. That Public Officers elected to Congress and as a public officer electors be barred from reviewing the elector votes in keeping to the mandates of the law of the land e. That based upon a review of the facts associated with the forgery of public documents to facilitate usurpation of the office of POTUS that Electors be given notice of their being held as an accessory after the fact to a forgery crime that would be referred for criminal proceeding. f. That based upon a review of the facts associated with the allegation of misprision of felony sedition and treason that Electors be given notice of their being held as an accessory after the fact to a felony, sedition and warned of treason per se crime that would be referred for criminal proceeding. g. That electors be instructed as to the actual historical meaning of Natural Born Citizen held by the state' of New York from before and after the 1776 issuance of the Declaration of Independence and with the proviso that were a Public Officer other than an independent elector per se to attempt to change the eligibility of a federal offrcer would be held in civil contempt in breach of public officer duties. h. And for further and different relief as the Court may deem necessary herein. Dated: Brooklyn, New York November 2012 / + Christopher-Earl: Strunk, in esse, Petitioner self-represent without being an attorney 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #28 1, Brooklyn, New York 11238. (845)90 1-6767 E-mail: chris@strunk.ws Christopher-Earl: Strunk's PETITION Page 19 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ) ) ss. ) Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury: I have read the foregoing Petition with six (6) questions at issue against each category of Respondent Public Officers and ~lectors' in their official capacity and or individually as against the unlawful misadministration and misapplication of New York Public Officers in the conduct of the General Election of November 6,201 2 in the election of US Senator Kirsten Gillibrand that is void ab initio, and in which Petitioner wishes a writ of prohibition with Temporary Restraining Order and permanent injunction with a Declaratory Judgment equity relief under jurisdiction of the CPLR Article 78 in conjunction with the New York State Election Law Article $16-100 requires emergency equity relief with a CPLR $7805 injunction with stay of New York Electoral College vote due by December 15,2012, and a declaratory judgment under CPLR $7806 as time is of the essence with irreparable harm; the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge. 26% Christopher-Earl: Strunk - ' -- ,. -. ~ . ,- S w o r n t o before me - . : - 7 ARNOLD 1. TlSHFlELD '-Notary Public State Of New YO;~" N0.41-4611662 Qualified In Queens County Certified in Kings County Commission Expires March 30, 20 7 -. -_ _ I - .. - , - Christopher-Earl: Strunk's PETITION Page 20 of 20 SUPREME COURT OF TIIE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 9 Index No.: Petitioner, Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY 10014 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Sheet -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 . Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; and Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Oflice 478 Russell Washington, DC 205 10 NOTICE OF PETITION PETITION PETITION VERIFICATION AFFIDAVIT n self-represent without being an attorney 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281, Brooklyn, New York 11238. (845) 901-6767 E-mail: chris@,strunk.ws NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Petitioner 1. 2. 3. Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 e Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 1W73 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 9. Robert D u e 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 10. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 r c K Koaa -- wear 5. 6. 7. 8. N -n ar15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 2 1. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 13. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 -IV,K jo~ ( l h G ~I L p& I B ) Z ~ N DCQFRCG D q@ &rJaL Respondents w &S~/rvGm(3 PL Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue --New York, NY 10037 Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A --New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street --New York, NY 10014 Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 Ken Jenkins 108 Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 107 10 - ush he^ NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78 PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS Please take notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show cause application a t the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake a t 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obarna ineligibility able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012? For further information Contact : Www .= \ b a j~*~leo. i ~7977-7 r/ Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse 593 Yanderbilf Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 Cellphone: 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.; 21948 / 2012 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ULSTER Accordingly, a. b. c. ) ) ss. ) I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury: Am over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My place of business is located at 351 North Road Hurley New York 12243. On November 14, 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the NOTICE OF PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13,2012 along with a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY INJUNCTION ON ISSUE OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS, a Notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19,2012 placing a complete set in a properly addressed to each respondent listed below for delivery by USPS by certified mail with request for return receipt for proof of service. On November 14, 2012, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by certified mail on the listed Electors and where each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and "PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon: d. 1. Hakeem Jeffries 35 2. Grace Meng ofl47l4 3. Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 CM I RR No 7012101000068749741 CM I RR No 7012101000068749819 CM I RR No 7012101000068749758 CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM I RR No I RR No I RR No I RR No IRR No I RR No I RR I RR IRR I RR No No No No 7012101000068749765 7012101000068749956 7012101000068749826 7012101000068749833 7012101000068749840 7012101000068749857 7012101000068749864 7012101000068749901 7012101000068750242 7012101000068749963 7012101000068749949 7012101000068749895 7012101000068749970 7012101000068749802 7012101000068749772 7012101000068749789 7012101000068749871 7012101000068749888 7012101000068749918 7012101 000068749925 7012101000068749932 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 lith Street -- Brooklyn. NY 11215 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #[2G -- New York. NY 10025 6. Keith L.T. Wright of2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York. NY 10037 7. Christine C. Quinn of263 Ninth Avenue. #3A -- New York, NY 10001 8. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York. NY 10027 9. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street. #3A -- New York, NY 10023 10. Emily Giske 01'440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 11. Anne Marie Anzaloue 2827 48th Street -- Astoria. NY 11103 12. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, N'r' 11433 13. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 14. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of820 Boyton Avenue. #6D -- Bronx. NY 10473 15. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers. NY 10710 16. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 17. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany. NY 12208 18. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 19. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 20. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 21. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 22. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 23. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 24. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 25. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; 26. Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510 4. 5. CM I RR No 7012101000068749796 CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM IRR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No C"!Rl'N~':'00006R7499R7 /#~ /;l.v~2r;;/ Van Allen Sworn to before me This i day of November rlliam 2012 ~ ~<-Drl tary Pubhc Q ~k.o-~ NOTARYPUBUC, JUDITHS.MA YHON STAT£; OF NEW YORK NO.01MA60B5585 QUALIFIED IN ULSTER COUNTY/'(j COMMISSION EXPIRES JUt Y 14, 20__ AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit D Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS -----------------------------------------------------------------------x Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue – 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 Index No.: 21948 / 2012 Filed November 14, 2012 Petitioner, -againstHakeem Jeffries , Grace Meng, Felix Ortiz, Bill DeBlasio, Walter Cooper, Keith L.T. Wright, Christine C. Quinn, William Thompson, Scott Stringer, Emily Giske, Anne Marie Anzalone, Archie Spigner, George Gresham, Ruben Diaz, Jr.; Ken Jenkins; Mario Cilento; Gerald D. Jennings; Byron Brown ; Robert Duffy; Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams ; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone; Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and Kirsten Gillibrand Respondents. PETITIONER’S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF NOTE OF ISSUE WITH CERTIFICATE OF READINESS FOR TRIAL OF ISSUES AND -----------------------------------------------------------------------x STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ) ) ss. ) FOR PARTIAL SEVERANCE Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury: To: Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. Part 1, Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. Part 27, 1. This is Petitioner’s affidavit in support of his note of issue and certificate of readiness by CPLR §3402 for a trial of issues by December 14, 2012 with partial severance for the benefit of captioned Respondent electors of the New York State Legislature’s Electoral College and members of Congress before the deadline to vote by December 17, 2012, and after January 3, 2013 for candidates for the office of President of the United States, and that whether by casting a vote for Barack Obama each may be charged with the crime of accessory after the fact of a felony committed on or about 25 April 2011 by persons as yet named, aided and abetted by White House Counsel Bob Bauer, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and Barack Obama who during the 27 April 2012 White House Press Conference, see the transcript evidence herein (see Exhibit 1), expressly presented a forged instrument to the People of the United States, a crime compounded by spoliation, concealment, perjury, tampering with the public record, intimidation of witnesses and other crimes. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s Affidavit in support of Note of Issue Page 1 of 3 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 TRIAL OF THE FACTS 2. That Petitioner requires a trial of the facts of a crime before December 17, 2012 essential for the proper execution of the Electoral College vote, say on December 13, 2012, and at which Petitioner will bring only one expert witness for testimony by Typographer Graphics Expert Paul Edward Irey from Delray Beach Florida to testify solely as to the nature of the forgery referenced above without determination of who the perpetrators are per se, as that is a criminal matter for authorities with jurisdiction. 3. That expert testimony by Paul Edward Irey is based upon the Affidavit with Exhibits A through D affirmed December 4, 2012, and herewith (see Exhibit 2) that is res ipso loquitur. 4. Petitioner contends that the body of the crime complained of has been brought to the attention of Respondents and various district attorneys with authority and jurisdiction to further investigate, and that the testimony deals with the fact that in 1961, well before computers or such other technologies that may be in use today, that ANY birth certificate paperwork was done either by hand and or on forms designed for use with the mechanical typewriter technology that was then widely used, rendering a forgery detectible; and that testimony presents the proof of forgery in the context of then mechanical technology in use, and also to prove the forged instrument is of current manufacturer, that the forgers use of the Unsharp Mask software by Adobe to create a Halo around lettering thus also sets the chain of custody of the forgery along with where it was manufactured. 5. That Respondent public officers as if Elector Public Officers and private US Citizens have duty as to matters of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty, any elelctor who would commit a crimne by adiding and abbetting a felony is incompatibkle. as to New York State law as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation with use of NYS Civil Service Law §105A and is to be barred as a person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States. 6. That it is a well-settled common law rule that a public officer cannot hold two incompatible offices simultaneously (Matter of Smith v Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39, 43 [1943]). This rule seeks to prevent offices of public trust from accumulating in a single individual. Two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the other or there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices (see People ex rel. Ryan v Green, 58 NY Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s Affidavit in support of Note of Issue Page 2 of 3 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue Exhibit 1 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... What was really dominating a lot of discussion was this fake controversy, essentially, a sideshow, that was distracting from this real issue. And an example of that would be when major Democrats and Republicans went onto mainstream news organizations to talk about their budget plans -- including the President -- they were asked about this. They were asked about what they thought about the controversy. They were asked if they believed the President was born in the United States. And it was really a distraction. That really struck the President, led him to ask his counsel to look into whether we could ask the state of Hawaii to release the long-form certificate, which is not something they generally do. And he did that despite the fact that it probably was not in his long-term -- it would have been in his -- probably in his long-term political interests to allow this birther debate to dominate discussion in the Republican Party for months to come. But he thought even though it might have been good politics, he thought it was bad for the country. And so he asked counsel to look into this. And now I’ll have Bob explain that, and then we’ll take your questions. MR. CARNEY: I just want to -- sorry, I meant to mention at the top, as some of you may have seen, the President will be coming to the briefing room at 9:45 a.m., making a brief statement about this -- not taking questions, but just wanted to let you know. MR. PFEIFFER: And he will use this as an opportunity to make a larger point about what this debate says about our politics. Go ahead, Bob. MR. BAUER: Early last week the decision was made to review the legal basis for seeking a waiver from the longstanding prohibition in the state Department of Health on releasing the long-form birth certificate. And so we undertook a legal analysis and determined a waiver request could be made that we had the grounds upon which to make that request. And by Thursday of last week, I spoke to private counsel to the President and asked her to contact the State Department of Health and to have a conversation about any requirements, further requirements, that they thought we had to satisfy to lodge that waiver request. She had that conversation with the state Department of Health on Thursday -- counsel in question is Judy Corley at the law firm of Perkins Coie, and you have a copy of the letter she subsequently sent to the department with the President’s written request. The department outlined the requirements for the President to make this request. He signed a letter making that request on Friday afternoon upon returning from the West Coast. And private counsel forwarded his written request -- written, signed request -- along with a letter from counsel, to the state Department of Health on Friday. For Immediate Release Get Email Updates Contact Us Home • Briefing Room • Press Briefings Search WhiteHouse.gov The White House Office of the Press Secretary April 27, 2011 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 James S. Brady Press Briefing Room 8:48 A.M. EDT MR. CARNEY: Good morning, everybody. You can read the paperwork we just handed out in a minute. Let me just get started. Thank you for coming this morning. I have with me today Dan Pfeiffer, the President’s Director of Communications, as well as Bob Bauer, the President’s White House Counsel, who will have a few things to say about the documents we handed to you today. And then we'll take your questions. I remind you this is off camera and only pen and pad, not for audio. And I give you Dan Pfeiffer. MR. PFEIFFER: Thanks, Jay. What you have in front of you now is a packet of papers that includes the President’s long-form birth certificate from the state of Hawaii, the original birth certificate that the President requested and we posted online in 2008, and then the correspondence between the President’s counsel and the Hawaii State Department of Health that led to the release of those documents. If you would just give me a minute to -- indulge me a second to walk through a little of the history here, since all of you weren't around in 2008 when we originally released the President’s birth certificate, I will do that. And then Bob Bauer will walk through the timeline of how we acquired these documents. In 2008, in response to media inquiries, the President’s campaign requested his birth certificate from the state of B L O G PO ST S ON T H I S I SS UE March 11, 2012 8:04 PM EDT Call with President Karzai Following the Report of Afghan Civilian Casualties President Obama reached out to President Karzai Sunday following the reported killing and sounding of Afghan civilians. March 11, 2012 9:00 AM EDT From the Archives: Tsunami in Japan 3 of 15 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House 3/11/2012 11:00 PM http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... 1 of 15 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House 3/11/2012 11:00 PM http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... The department, as I understood it, after reviewing the law and reviewing the grounds asserted in the request, came to the conclusion that a waiver could be appropriately granted. We were advised that the long-form birth certificate could be copied and made available to us as early as Monday, April 25th -- the day before yesterday. And we made arrangements for counsel to travel to Honolulu to pick it up and it was returned to the White House yesterday afternoon. Let me emphasize again, there is a specific statute that governs access to and inspection of vital records in the state of Hawaii. The birth certificate that we posted online is, in fact, and always has been, and remains, the legal birth certificate of the President that would be used for all legal purposes that any resident of Hawaii would want to use a birth certificate for. However, there is legal authority in the department to make exceptions to the general policy on not releasing the long-form birth certificate. The policy in question, by the way, on non-release has been in effect since the mid-1980s, I understand. So while I cannot tell you what the entire history of exceptions has been, it is a limited one. This is one of very few that I understand have been granted for the reasons set out in private counsel’s letter. MR. PFEIFFER: We'll be happy to take some questions. Hawaii. We received that document; we posted it on the website. That document was then inspected by independent fact checkers, who came to the campaign headquarters and inspected the document -- independent fact checkers did, and declared that it was proof positive that the President was born in Hawaii. To be clear, the document we presented on the President’s website in 2008 is his birth certificate. It is the piece of paper that every Hawaiian receives when they contact the state to request a birth certificate. It is the birth certificate they take to the Department of Motor Vehicles to get their driver’s license and that they take to the federal government to get their passport. It is the legally recognized document. That essentially -- for those of you who followed the campaign closely know that solved the issue. We didn’t spend any time talking about this after that. There may have been some very fringe discussion out there, but as a campaign issue it was settled and it was -Q When you posted this did you post the other side of it where the signature is? A look back at the U.S. response to the devastating earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan in March of 2011. March 10, 2012 6:30 AM EDT Weekly Address: Investing in a Clean Energy Future Speaking from a factory in Virginia, President Obama talks about how companies are creating more jobs in the United States, making better products than ever before, and how many are developing new technologies that are reducing our dependence on foreign oil and saving families money at the pump. MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. Q Q I guess I just want to make sure that we’re clear on this. Even though this one says “certificate of live birth” on here, this is different than the other certificate of live birth that we’ve seen? MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. The second page there is the one that was posted on the Internet. Q Okay. That settled the issue. In recent weeks, the issue has risen again as some folks have begun raising a question about the original -- about the long-form birth certificate you now have in front of you. And Bob will explain why -the extraordinary steps we had to take to receive that and the legal restraints that are in place there. But it became an issue again. And it went to -- essentially the discussion transcended from the nether regions of the Internet into mainstream political debate in this country. It became something that when both Republicans and Democrats were talking to the media they were asked about. It was a constant discussion on mainstream news organizations. And the President believed that it was becoming a distraction from the major issues we're having in this country. And he was particularly struck by the fact that right after the Republicans released their budget framework and the President released his, we were prepared to have a very important, very vigorous debate in this country about the future of the country, the direction we’re going to take, how we’re doing to deal with very important issues like education, Medicare, how we’re going to deal with taxes in this country. And that should -- that’s the debate we should be having yet. Because it is not here and that's been an issue. VIEW ALL RELATED BLOG POSTS MR. PFEIFFER: We posted both sides and when it was looked at it was looked at by -- the fact checkers came to headquarters and actually examined the document we had. Facebook Twitter Flickr Google+ YouTube Vimeo iTunes LinkedIn MR. PFEIFFER: And that is a copy of the one that has been kept at the Hawaii Department of Health. Q Okay. And this is the one that would be referred to -- that people have been asking for that is the birth certificate? MR. PFEIFFER: They are both -- the second one is the birth certificate. The one on the top is what is referred to as the long-form birth certificate. As you can see -- and Bob can walk you through it -- it contains some additional information that is not on the second page, which was the birth certificate which was released during the campaign. If you could just explain the difference. 4 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM 2 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... MR. PFEIFFER: There will always be some selection of people who will believe something, and that's not the issue. The issue is that this is not a discussion that is just happening among conspiracy theorists. It’s happening here in this room; it’s happening on all of the networks. And it’s something that, as I said, every major political figure of both parties who’s actually out trying to talk about real issues is asked about this by the media. And so the President decided to release this. And I'll leave it to others to decide whether there’s still -- there will be some who still have a different -- have a conspiracy about this. Q You’ve got two certified copies, according to this study. You have these physical -- MR. BAUER: There’s a difference between a certificate and a certification. The certification is simply a verification of certain information that’s in the original birth certificate. The birth certificate, as you can see, has signatures at the bottom from the attending physician, the local registrar, who essentially oversees the maintenance of the records. It contains some additional information also -- that is to say, the original birth certificate -- it contains some additional information like the ages of the parents, birthplaces, residence, street address, the name of the hospital. The core information that’s required for legal purposes and that is put into the actual certification that’s a computer-generated document, which we posted in 2008, that information is abstracted, if you will, from the original birth certificate, put into the computerized short-form certification, and made available to Hawaiian residents at their request. So the long form, which is a certificate, has more information, but the short form has the information that’s legally sufficient for all the relevant purposes. Q This first one has never been released publicly, correct? MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. I showed you one. Just one. Q You showed us a photocopy of one. MR. PFEIFFER: No, I showed you -Q Does that have a stamp? MR. PFEIFFER: It has a seal on it. Q Why does this rise to the level of a presidential statement? MR. BAUER: That’s correct. It is in a bound volume in the records at the state Department of Health in Hawaii. Q Bob, can you explain why President Obama let this drag on for four years? Was it Donald Trump that prompted you to issue this? MR. BAUER: I’ll let Dan -MR. PFEIFFER: Sure. Q I know you expected that question, right? (Laughter.) MR. PFEIFFER: He even said you would be the one who would ask it. (Laughter.) I don’t think this dragged on for four years because this was a resolved -- for those of you who remember the campaign, this issue was resolved in 2008. And it has not been an issue, none of you have asked about it, called about it, reported on it until the last few weeks. And as I said earlier, it probably would have been -- a lot of the pundits out there have talked about the fact that this whole birther debate has been really bad for the Republican Party and would probably be good for the President politically. But despite that, the President, as I said, was struck by how this was crowding out the debate, MR. PFEIFFER: The President -- this in itself -- when you hear the President I think you’ll understand the point he’s making. That will be in not too long. Q Did the President change his own mind about this? In other words, was he advocating during the campaign let’s just put it out there and get it over with, or was this an internal shift in thinking based -- in other words, was it the President who steadfastly during the campaign said this is ridiculous, I don't want to give this any more ground, and has now changed his mind? Or is this the -MR. PFEIFFER: Let’s be very clear. You were there for the campaign. There was never a question about the original birth certificate during the campaign. It was a settled issue. I was there for the original decision to release the birth certificate. I was there when we posted it online. I'm not sure I even knew there was an original one that was different than the one we posted online because it wasn’t an issue. So it wasn’t like -- let’s be very clear. We were asked for the President’s birth certificate in 2008; we released the President’s birth certificate; and it was done. That was it. 7 of 15 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House 3/11/2012 11:00 PM http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... 5 of 15 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House 3/11/2012 11:00 PM http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... And so there hasn’t been a discussion about this other document for years. It’s only been in the last few weeks. And so to your second question, the President decided to do this and he'll talk about this when he gets here -decided to do it at the timeline that Bob laid out because it was a -- this was a sideshow that was distracting from the real challenges that we're facing. It’s not just a sideshow for him; it’s a sideshow for our entire politics that have become focused on this. Q Not to give Donald Trump more publicity than he has, but is he the person who sort of -- sort of that bridge between what you're calling a fringe and the mainstream? Do you think that he’s the reason why this tripped the switch to a level where you now have to deal with something you thought was dealt with? MR. PFEIFFER: It’s not for me to say why mainstream media organizations began to cover this debate. They’ll have to answer that for themselves. Q How concerned were you about running against Donald Trump in a general election? particularly around the budget, on important issues, and was an example of the sort of sideshows that our politics focuses on instead of the real challenges that we have to confront as a country. And so that’s why he made this decision now, because it became an issue that transcended sort of this -- it essentially was something that was talked about, as I said, from the nether regions of the Internet onto mainstream network newscasts. In fact, Jay has been asked about this just yesterday in this room. Q So I guess the implication is that you did get political advantage by having not released this until today, over the course of the last four years? MR. PFEIFFER: There has been -- no one that I can recall actually asked us to -- we were asked to release the President’s birth certificate in 2008. We did that. And then no one -- it never -- up until a few weeks ago, there was never an issue about that that wasn’t the birth certificate from any credible individual or media outlet. And it hasn’t been until -- I mean, Jay was asked about this yesterday -Q When you say that, you mean certification -- you released the certification? MR. PFEIFFER: I'd refer any questions on the election to the campaign. Q Can you address the reports of Petraeus to the CIA and DOD -MR. PFEIFFER: When any Hawaiian wants -- requests their birth certificate because they want to get a driver’s license, they want to get a passport, they do exactly what the President did in 2008. And that’s what that is. And we released that. And that’s what any Hawaiian would do to release their birth certificate. And that was good enough for everyone until very recently this became a question again. And so the President made this decision. He’ll talk to you more about his thinking on that. Q And this is going to sound -- I mean, you can just anticipate what people are going to -- remain unconvinced. They’re going to say that this is just a photocopy of a piece of paper, you could have typed anything in there. Will the actual certificate be on display or viewable at any -- (laughter.) Q MR. PFEIFFER: The point I'd make is that we weren't the ones who -- we're not the first ones to bring this up in this room. Jay has been asked questions about this; the President has been asked about it in media interviews. And so that wasn’t a decision that we made, and the President made the decision to do this and he made the decision to -- and when he comes down here this morning he'll talk to you about why he thinks there’s an important point to be made here. Q Getting back to the personnel announcements, does the President understand that these announcements have been made and sourced satisfactorily for most news organizations before he speaks up and he’s not letting his Will the President be holding it? MR. PFEIFFER: You get points for that, Carol. (Laughter.) MR. CARNEY: Yes. I don't have -- but you’ll be disappointed to learn that I don't have a personnel announcement for you. The President will be addressing this -- questions about personnel tomorrow. Q Dan, was there a debate about whether or not this deserved being discussed by the White House, whether or not -- and I'm going back to the birth certificate. I lose points, I understand. But was there debate about whether or not this was worthy of the White House? MR. PFEIFFER: He will not, and I will not leave it here for him to do so. But it will -- the State Department of Health in Hawaii will obviously attest that that is a -- what they have on file. As Bob said, it’s in a book in Hawaii. MR. BAUER: And you’ll see the letter from the director of the Health Department that states that she oversaw the copy and is attesting to -Q But do you understand that this could quiet the conspiracy theorists? 8 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM 6 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... MR. CARNEY: I don't have anything for you on that this morning. Q Just quickly, back on the birth certificate, yesterday you said this was a settled issue. So -- White House corroborate? MR. CARNEY: I don't have a comment on that for you, Bill. (Laughter.) Q I mean, this is such BS. It’s all out there and you guys are -- okay, the President is going to talk about this tomorrow so we can't say anything. MR. CARNEY: Bill, you're free to make phone calls everywhere you can. I'm just saying that we don't have a personnel announcement for you today. Q And he'll tomorrow, he'll cover all the aforementioned switches? MR. CARNEY: Well, as Dan said, again, it has been a settled issue. MR. PFEIFFER: From a factual point of view, it’s absolutely a settled issue. But the fact that it was a settled issue did not keep it from becoming a major part of the political discussion in this town for the last several weeks here. So there’s absolutely no question that what the President released in 2008 was his birth certificate and answered that question, and many of your organizations have done excellent reporting which proved that to be the case. But it continued; the President thought it was a sideshow and chose to take this step today for the reasons Bob laid out. Q Aside from the policy distractions that was presented, did you have some concern because it was sort of reaching back into the mainstream news coverage that this could become a factor in the 2012 election with centrist voters? MR. PFEIFFER: No. Q Just to clarify what this document is -- MR. CARNEY: We'll have a personnel announcement tomorrow. Q Jay, yesterday you talked about failsafe triggers as sort of a positive alternative to spending cuts. I'm wondering if the White House has any openness to including that, because it’s a White House proposal, including that in any legislation that would raise the debt ceiling limit. MR. CARNEY: Well, what we've said very clearly, and I think Secretary Geithner said it eloquently yesterday, it is a dangerous, risky idea to hold hostage any other -- hold hostage, rather, raising the debt ceiling, a vote on raising the debt ceiling, to any other piece of legislation. The commitment this President has to moving aggressively towards a comprehensive deficit reduction plan is clear. It will be clear again when the Vice President convenes a meeting, bipartisan, bicameral meeting, next week. And he hopes that progress will be made on that very quickly. In terms of negotiating what that would look like, I think the negotiators should do that, led by the Vice President, Republicans and Democrats together. But again, explicitly linking or holding hostage the absolute necessity of raising the debt ceiling to any other piece of legislation and declaring that we'll tank the U.S. economy and perhaps the global economy if we don't get this specific thing that we want, I think is a dangerous and unprecedented thing to do. And we're confident, remain confident, that the leaders of both parties in Congress, as well as the President, will agree with the President, as I have said many times, that we do not have an alternative to raising the debt ceiling because, as many have said, outside observers, economists and businessmen and women, the impact of that would be calamitous at best. Q So even though it’s your own proposal that you guys endorsed you don't want to see it as part of the final MR. PFEIFFER: This is the -- the letter first and the two certified copies -- this is one of those. This is the same thing you have a copy of as the first page of your packet. Q How did it get here? MR. PFEIFFER: As Bob said, it arrived by plane -- the President’s personal counsel went to Hawaii and brought it back and we got it last night. Q Last night? MR. PFEIFFER: Last night. Q What time? MR. PFEIFFER: Between 4:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. 11 of 15 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House 3/11/2012 11:00 PM http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... 9 of 15 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House 3/11/2012 11:00 PM http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... Q When did you decide to do this gaggle? package? MR. CARNEY: I'm not negotiating individual pieces of a package that we hope Republicans and Democrats can come together around from this podium. But again, we believe it’s essential to -- the President believes -- that's one of the reasons why we're doing this right now -- we believe that these are big debates that need to be had. They can be contentious, argumentative, serious, comprehensive, detailed, because they’re important; they’re all about America’s future. And they’re about visions of this country and where we're going that need to be debated. And this debate was being crowded out in many ways by a sideshow. And he looks forward to having a debate on the real issues that Americans want us to talk about -- long-term economic plans, deficit reduction, investments in the kinds of things that will help this economy grow and create jobs, dealing with our energy needs, a long-term energy plan. These are all issues that have been sidetracked at least in the public debate by some of the issues that we're talking about this morning. Q Is there a concern that more and more people were actually starting to believe its sideshow -- I mean, people have been asking about -MR. CARNEY: I will let the President speak for himself, but what Dan was saying and I think is important is that the issue here is that the President feels that this was bad for the country; that it’s not healthy for our political debate, when we have so many important issues that Americans care about, that affect their lives, to be drawn into sideshows about fallacies that have been disproven with the full weight of a legal document for several years. So, again, as Dan said, and a lot of political pundits have said, you could say that it would be good politics, smart politics, for the President to let this play out. He cares more about what’s good for the country. He wants the debate on the issues. He wants the focus on the issues that Americans care about. Q Jay, the President yesterday said that he had been talking to oil exporters about increasing output. Who specifically has he been talking -MR. CARNEY: Well, I said -- I want to clarify. I said several times I believe from this podium when asked questions about our overall handling of the issue of high gas prices that we've had conversations with oil-producing states and allies and those conversations continue. I don't have specific “the President spoke with this leader or other government officials spoke with others,” but those are ongoing conversations that, of course, we would be having in a situation like this. Q Do you guys have any comment on the NATO soldiers that were killed in Afghanistan and any confirmation on whether there were Americans? MR. PFEIFFER: What’s that? Q When was this gaggle put on -- when was this planned? MR. PFEIFFER: Whatever time you received your guidance suggesting that it would be “this time tomorrow morning.” Q Are these letters supposed to demonstrate the legal steps that were involved in releasing it to the White House counsel? MR. BAUER: The letters that you have, the personal request from the President, along with the accompanying letter from private counsel, is merely meant to document the legal path to getting the waiver of that policy so we could get the long-form certificate. Q The waiver of Hawaii state government policy? MR. BAUER: Right. The non-release of the long-form certificate, which has been in effect since the 1980s -- a natural question would have been, well, what did you do to obtain the waiver, and those letters represent the request. Q Well, isn’t it true that anybody who was born in Hawaii can write this letter? I mean, that's all there is to the waiver process? MR. BAUER: No. Let me just explain once again because I also noticed, by the way, in one report already the wrong certificate was actually posted on the website. The certificate with the signatures at the bottom -- and that's a key difference between the short form and the long form -- the long form has signatures at the bottom from the attending physician, the local registrar, and the mother, is the original birth certificate, which sits in a bound volume in the State Department of Health. The short from is a computerized abstract, and that's the legal birth certificate we requested in 2008 and that Hawaiians are entitled to. Since the mid-1980s, the State Department of Health, for administrative reasons, only provides to people who request their birth certificate the short form. They do not provide the long form. So in order for us to obtain the long form, we had to have a waiver. We had to actually determine that there was 12 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM 10 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... a legal basis for providing it, and then ask them to exercise their authority to provide us with the long form. The steps required to accomplish that were a letter from the person with the direct and vital interest -- the President -- so you have a letter from the President, and then there was an accompanying letter from counsel basically formalizing the request. So the reason we included that is that those were legal steps we took to obtain the long form by way of this waiver. Q Do we have the letter from the President -- MR. BAUER: It’s in the packet. Q And you went to Hawaii? MR. BAUER: I did not go to Hawaii. The counsel, Judy Corley, who signed the -- the President’s personal counsel at Perkins Coie, Judy Corley, whose letter -- signed letter of request is in your packet, traveled to Honolulu and picked up the birth certificate. Q A question on the situation regarding the Defense of Marriage Act. Yesterday Attorney General Eric Holder rejected attacks on Paul Clement, who is taking up defense of the statute on behalf of the U.S. House. Paul Clement has taken a lot of heat from the LGBT community for volunteering to take up defense of DOMA. Eric Holder said, “Paul Clement is a great lawyer and has done a lot of really great things for this nation. In taking on the representation -- representing Congress in connection with DOMA, I think he is doing that which lawyers do when we’re at our best. That criticism I think was very misplaced.” And Holder went on to compare the criticism of Clement to attacks on the Justice Department lawyers for their past for detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Does the President share Eric Holder’s views on this? MR. CARNEY: We do share Eric Holder’s views on this. We think -- as we said from the beginning when we talked about -- when I did from this podium -- about the decision no longer from the administration to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, that we would support efforts by Congress if they so chose to defend it. And so I have nothing to add to the Attorney General’s comments. Q Following Monday’s Af-Pak Situation Room meeting, what is the President’s assessment of the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan? And does he think that July drawdown is still on? MR. CARNEY: The President’s policy, which included the beginning of a transition -- beginning of a drawdown of American troops, is absolutely still on track. I don’t have anything additionally from the meeting yesterday beyond what we’ve said. But the policy remains as it was. 13 of 15 Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney, 4/27/2011 | The White House 3/11/2012 11:00 PM http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carne... MR. EARNEST: Jay, we should wrap it up here. MR. CARNEY: Yes. Last one, yes. Q Given the comments of the Pakistani official quoted in the Wall Street Journal, is Pakistan still a U.S. ally, and to what extent? MR. CARNEY: Pakistan is still a U.S. ally. Thanks. END 9:18 A.M. EDT 14 of 15 3/11/2012 11:00 PM Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue Exhibit 2 page 9 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Paul Edward Irey’s AFFIDAVIT Exhibit A Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Paul Edward Irey’s AFFIDAVIT Exhibit B Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Paul Edward Irey’s AFFIDAVIT Exhibit C Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Paul Edward Irey’s AFFIDAVIT Exhibit D Re: binder 11 ... - Yahoo! Mail http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=12&filterBy=&... Re: binder 11 ... From: "Henry Wayland Blake" To: "Paul Irey" , "Doug Vogt" , orly.taitz@gmail.com, cestrunck@yahoo.com, "Chito Papa" 3 Files (1688KB) Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:26 AM 1051324… 1051324… 1051324… Dear Paul,   I think you have proposed the most probable scenario based on the crea on and file dates of the associated court documents.   1.  The paper copy of the Tepper to Fuddy 3‐page le er was dated 05/26/2012.   2.  The electronic version of this 3‐page le er appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012   3.  The Tepper four‐page electronic document 10513240131.pdf (same as 35‐1.pdf) was created on 06/04/2012 and was last modified on 06/06/2012.  Pages 1‐3 of this document are the 3 electronic pages of the Tepper to Fuddy le er that appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012.  The 4th electronic page is the Tepper page 4, LFCOLB.  This four‐page document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012.   4.  We really don’t know when the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB was created.      5.  The paper copy of the one‐page Onaka to Tepper verifica on le er was dated 05/31/2012.   6.  The electronic version, which is court document 35‐2, was created on 06/04/2012 and was last modified on 06/06/2012.  This one‐page electronic document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012.   I believe that the most likely scenario is that Tepper created a paper copy of his three‐page le er to Fuddy on 05/26/2012.  He a ached a paper printout copy of the original WH LFCOLB and mailed this four‐page paper copy to Fuddy.   Tepper and Onaka then collaborated to alter the WH LFCOLB to create the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB.   On 06/04/2012, Tepper created the documents 10513240131.pdf (same as 35‐1) and 35‐2.   He then filed the two documents 35‐1 and 35‐2 in MS on 06/06/2012.   We really don’t know the individual ac ons of either Tepper or Onaka with regards the modifica ons of the WH LFCOLB PDF image file to create the altered LFCOLB PDF image file.  Onaka may have modified the WH LFCOLB and then sent the altered PDF image to Tepper as a one‐page PDF image file.  There is 1 of 3 12/4/2012 3:13 PM Re: binder 11 ... - Yahoo! Mail http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=12&filterBy=&... nothing in his verifica on le er that indicates that he a ached this altered LFCOLB to his verifica on le er.  However, his le er does refer to the LFCOLB copy that was purportedly a ached to the four‐page request le er from Tepper to Fuddy.   Alterna vely, Tepper might have had someone else modify the WH LFCOLB PDF image to create the altered PDF image.  That might explain why the METADATA was not en rely erased from his four‐page electronic document.  We know that a scanner was used so Tepper’s forger would have had to have some means of re‐sizing a scanned and altered image of the WH LFCOLB back to the correct size to match a real 1961 Cer ficate of Live Birth printed form.    I am now certain that the 21 added objects which are invisible in Adobe Reader pre‐existed before 06/04/2012 as a separate PDF image.  The 21 objects include 12 line segements, 2 broad‐line strikeouts and 7 Black redac on rectangles.  This “redac on” page is smaller than the LFCOLB image page size.  I have successfully separated this smaller “redac on” image from the fla ened and altered WH LFCOLB image in both Adobe Illustrator CS6 and Inkscape.  I have a ached my latest screenshots from Adobe Illustrator as proof.  The screenshot [105132401131_ss3.jpg] a ached shows the “redac on” page slid off the LFCOLB image page to the right.  The background of the “redac on” page is transparent.   So an alterna ve scenario would be that Tepper had his forger modify the WH LFCOLB and Onaka provided the “redac on” image to assist Tepper’s forger re‐size his scanned image.  This would lessen Onaka’s involvement with the crea on of the fraudulent LFCOLB Tepper page 4 LFCOLB.   So scenario A would be that Onaka did the deed and scenario B would be that they collaborated to do the deed.   Either way they both are guilty of a emp ng to pull off a bait and switch on Judge Wingate.  They subs tuted the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB for the WH LFCOLB and didn’t tell Judge Wingate about the switch.   I can provide a notarized copy of my sworn affidavit whenever you need it.  Also, I can provide any of my screen shots as required.  I would prefer not to tes fy because of personal reasons.  I also believe that. if I were to tes fy, then I would quickly become a “punching bag” for the defense because I don’t have an IT cer ficate and I have never tes fied as a forensic expert.     Sincerely,   Henry   From: Paul Irey Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 5:54 AM To: doug@vectorpub.com ; orly.taitz@gmail.com ; cestrunck@yahoo.com ; hwblake@bellsouth.net Subject: binder 11 ...     __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7763 (20121204) __________ 2 of 3 12/4/2012 3:13 PM Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue Exhibit 3 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.; 21948 / 2012 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ULSTER Accordingly, a. b. c. ) ) ss. ) I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury: Am over 18 years of age and not a party to this action. My place of business is located at 351 North Road Hurley New York 12243. On November 14, 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the NOTICE OF PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13,2012 along with a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY INJUNCTION ON ISSUE OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS, a Notice of Petitioner's intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19,2012 placing a complete set in a properly addressed to each respondent listed below for delivery by USPS by certified mail with request for return receipt for proof of service. On November 14, 2012, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by certified mail on the listed Electors and where each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and "PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon: d. 1. Hakeem Jeffries 35 2. Grace Meng ofl47l4 3. Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 CM I RR No 7012101000068749741 CM I RR No 7012101000068749819 CM I RR No 7012101000068749758 CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM I RR No I RR No I RR No I RR No IRR No I RR No I RR I RR IRR I RR No No No No 7012101000068749765 7012101000068749956 7012101000068749826 7012101000068749833 7012101000068749840 7012101000068749857 7012101000068749864 7012101000068749901 7012101000068750242 7012101000068749963 7012101000068749949 7012101000068749895 7012101000068749970 7012101000068749802 7012101000068749772 7012101000068749789 7012101000068749871 7012101000068749888 7012101000068749918 7012101 000068749925 7012101000068749932 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Bill DeBlasio of 442 lith Street -- Brooklyn. NY 11215 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #[2G -- New York. NY 10025 6. Keith L.T. Wright of2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York. NY 10037 7. Christine C. Quinn of263 Ninth Avenue. #3A -- New York, NY 10001 8. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York. NY 10027 9. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street. #3A -- New York, NY 10023 10. Emily Giske 01'440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 11. Anne Marie Anzaloue 2827 48th Street -- Astoria. NY 11103 12. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, N'r' 11433 13. George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 14. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of820 Boyton Avenue. #6D -- Bronx. NY 10473 15. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers. NY 10710 16. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 17. Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany. NY 12208 18. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 19. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 20. Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 21. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 22. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 23. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 24. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 25. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849; 26. Kirsten Gillibrand with DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510 4. 5. CM I RR No 7012101000068749796 CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM IRR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No CM I RR No C"!Rl'N~':'00006R7499R7 /#~ /;l.v~2r;;/ Van Allen Sworn to before me This i day of November rlliam 2012 ~ ~<-Drl tary Pubhc Q ~k.o-~ NOTARYPUBUC, JUDITHS.MA YHON STAT£; OF NEW YORK NO.01MA60B5585 QUALIFIED IN ULSTER COUNTY/'(j COMMISSION EXPIRES JUt Y 14, 20__ Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 W S S C for Kings county Index No.; 21 948 / 2012 , - 0 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ) ss. ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) TY OF KINGS Aecordingly, I, I Rou&e efi ALL being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of pejury: over 18 y e a r s of age a n d n o t a party t o t h i s action. K 11 place of b u s i n e s s i s located at November 3 0 , 2 0 1 2 , Christopher S t r u n k instructed m e t o serve a true conformed copy of t h e PETITIONER'S -- >OND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF OSC with EXHIBITS a n n e x e d AFFIRMED November 30,2012 along with a copy of t h e NOTICE OF PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 1 3 , 2 0 1 2 placing a complete s e t i n a properly addressed envelope to e a c h respondent listed below for delivery by USPS regular 6J5 f/& ZoG mail. d. O n November 3 0 , 2 0 1 2 , I c a u s e d e a c h copy with proper postage for service b y first class mail o n t h e listed Electors And where e a c h envelope w a s properly addressed with t h e Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" a n d PERSONAL 8a CONFIDENTJAL" i n t h e lower left h a n d c o m e r of the envelop t h a t w a s then deposited with the USPS for service upon: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Hakeern Jeffi-ies 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Bill DeBlasio of442 1lth Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 12. Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 13. Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 14. Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York,,NY 10002 15. Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 16. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 17. William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 18. Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A --New York, NY 10023 19. Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 20. Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 21. Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 22. Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 23. Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 24. Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 25. Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 26. Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 27. Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 28. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 29. Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 30. Joshua Pepper NYSAssiatant Attorney General Office of Attorney General 120 Broadway NY NY 10171 31 K L Q ~ T V CrfCtVrc/@(l VtWQ $ f = f = I C @ r L E q B E ~ ~ S ~ L Wmy18 ~ W H : ., KAMAL P. SON1 Notary Public, State of New York No. 01SO6089949 Qualified in Kings C0unly Commission Expires March 31.2015 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of Note of Issue Exhibit 4 -QUEST Supreme Index No: FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION" UCS-840 (312011) For Court Clerk Use Only: IAS tntry Uate COURT, COUNTY OF Kings 2 1 ?* Zo(a Date Index Issued: &V. rc/ 2012 -JuageAssigned KJI Uate CAPTION: Enter the complete case caption. Do notuse et a 1or e t am. If mae space is required, attach a caption nder sheet. I againstH~,.e Unrtea S t a : e s cne same amount of vaney :hat was previously ~ a l d ln the 60's. Now I worked as a soda lerk for one collar an hour, mlnlmurr ?ay, and certainly Sl5 an hoLr 16 rwice m : n l m u m : r paj- so that's pore d ~ n l n ~ m a ~ s a r . d thry'ra gerring pa;a by aler shall be appnlr~edan terms of 1960, '62. The questlon of belng a federal officer Stare $ : 5 per elector. T5ey are a - - b,is 1s a11 carried over fror. tne 60's on : h e dlmlnrnois q-estlon ,aten c?ey rewrote rhe lau there are a s e r : e I 1 1 - urder the Federal Zo-atltutlon, rrhlch 1s In Frticlf tko, secr-an one, clause two, whlcn can be found In the xernoranda 05 law on paze ihree, on page tcree of - - four of fLoe o? tne bacc, all the way ~n t t . e back on rhe nemorandum cf lati, a11 the way Ir the back, four of floe, f o ~ r of i ~ v e , states tnz; : h e rhe 713's and zhar cases of c o n s t : t ; t : o n a _ regarding tne relstl-nshlp of party ~ r v o l v e ~ e n t to State, publlc lrterest and Sraie acrron. Tnat belrg s h n r r e d 1444 In whlch the Jaynlrd Democra~lc ?zrry as a select rnsider's gcouc .*ere flxlng : h e process cf ~ h o ende3 up h e prlnary so they were to be candidates In : excl~dlngothers. In 1953, again tce Jaybirc Democratic Parry was, -,ha;'s exhibit number 11, <.,as held lr. Crzted States Corszltutlon, Ertlcle zuo, section sne, clause rwo, each state 572-1 aspoirt I n such - THE COURT: K-ere are you? m . STRUNK: E-ght here. IIndlcatlng.) MR. STRLNK: Xzcn Stare shall apao;li E-ac r l e y ~ m l c not, =hey .cad to haire en open prlmary, they had : o not have the lnner clrcle of the party control that whlch t r . e people themselves were belrg excl~ded from In terrs of cornpe:lng for the xternal pcs~trons. has oeen carrred forward asscclatlon. There 1s two ;lasses = : c h i n SirCCture. ? r i a chat so, : i z : ' s the parry tbe corsldera~lo-wrlch I thlnZ 1s ex:remely rnporran: ro brlry us u3 l n : o rhe 21s: k d char's wka: In SLaLe Law In thar the Inner clrcles have h e Elec~3raL Cc__ege. controlled : It's change"? the prlnary. The century and : n r ? . e same way as the per alem woula be D r o ~ g r t~ p . 1 m a n z luror, you askea me to ansder, 1 people, the com.on nan iyrc are party memers, run on 2 : h e ]ur3r a ?ubllc offlcerl ccequrvoca-ly aoso-~cel) nor. I say C3 by C3 oasis, delegates at the convention and : h e party 1-slders take over to control che voie. Btcause they The -hole process of a lury, of c ' e c k ~ n y excesses of goverment, 1s : 3 cltrrec ; s the chezk are, lt's to thelr oeneflt to control ~t because they have rhz most LO make sure rbat e ' t galr by against excesses ana overreaching by publrc officers. ur the point tnat a liror becomes a publlc offlcer, we're In deep trouole. So ;ertarnly lury nu1l;iica:lon serlcus o : . g o l z g : s 1 patracage, by bei?a cn the lnslder to vote whoever they've agreed to vote for no matter whai a r . a r h a r :nose who are on the outslde wco car'= gci on the l n s l d e who problem, b ~ r you asked me has 1 were In t - e prlrnarles, who wen: to the ccnventlor, wno d ; d cast thelr votes, they are not allowed co parzlclpate. So if I r h o ~ q h ta ILror I say absolutely n o : . p u a l ~ cofflser, It's agalrst the fnndarnenrils of the Ccnstitjrlcn :u ever: Jaybird It's ccnslcer a lurcr as a pub:-c off:-er. I'n c 3 1 ~ , p z : i ? g l? -1 1 0 rhe Dernocratlc Party Lhis case ln 1453. Turthsrnore, Justice Caujlas 'xho, iltko-gh I don't a7ree wlth nany of the things he d ~ d as a very klgh level mason exclusionary. prote3:lon It's a vlolatlon of equal for parry me~rbersas an *no sorked wlrh 2 % who was the SEC boss rfcer Jasepn Kenredy, cerrainly u-derstood 2nd sroflred ln pcl?p into chat wrole prozess l r . 1933 -hen : h e structure whlch as an autocncy and plutocracy and controls publ-c ?o-icy from - THE COURT: WhaE statuze deals wlth ? . o w Securlty Xxchange Comlss~or the electors are elec~edl was set up. He, In a concxrrence rn Barer v. Carr made a very, mporraxi presentation w h ~ c h 3r1n2s the 1ssLes t h a : 1'7 reffrrlny ro lrto !a. STRjNK: Ir, : h e conventlcn or In cne - - this 1s elecrion law, speclfrcally. In che prlnary procsss? T3SCOURT: I*. Zorqe: : h e prlmary. sons~derzrlono r . tna qest-on 0 5 po11c~ca1 quesrlons and wksrcer or noc rhe Cour: can Inceruene. a d , rn other words, li the Court can't .nternene on s~meL!llnq 2s importart as eleccron law, rhls LS STRUNK: Thzz's artrcle 12. THE COURT: president. I? rhe rote for : h e lm. STRUNK: Article 12. T h ~ y are candidates. like -- e-ezt~o. _ad ; bus THE COURT: F . r : l c l e ER. STRUNK: THE COURT: 12 of7 1s diiierexr tnzli s-rrlrc In the 3 a c k of and zerca~nlyt h ; : The Elecrlal Lad. 3 1 g ? : . 1s the 'undarnercal thai we are mcvlnj ahead on. Znd certa~rlynotwltrstazdlng w h ; : Church-ll had : o say ,when ke sald you ELR. STRUNK: That they are seated under h e ; 12 - - 12-100, : THE COURT: ; r e g e t : : n j certlf~ed. ho* are they p~cked? Tney are prcked by che - - meashre daaocracy based Leon z ten n : : ~ J t e ccnversat~anwirh an .%ner~can, zrzt's our ec-~catlon system. You can't blb-e the fact that we have ar. ed~cat;cn systen! W~LCP. 'woulir almost p r o x ~ t Pa. S T 3 J N K : at large. Thls 1 s a State - - we go from a primary, whlch 1s a CD oy CD basis, and at large basls wnlcn 31 electors are cnosen ac Large so yo2 have no cholce : o say I don't rre lnner clrcle, the Jayblrd sorr of ?arty want that eleccor, cur I'll rake that elector. It's w l n : . e r take all and we cave ro z k o ~ z e -- THE COU3T: Ii was - - tne Jayblrd case whatsoever w w r ite ?HE C O I T : 1.m. bas regardlng what, the p r x a r y or regardlng the general elecrron? Eow do y o P ~IC~ : r e e-eciorsl on ST3.34K: Ac tne general elez:lon FIR. STRrJ4X: Regarding ine generaelection. They cortrolled the prlyary. They controlled uto appeared on tre ballot -n the general slectlon. T ' e r e was no process a general - - o r . a ballot by party tka: tne carty has tnelr eleccors slats. We aoce ' o r that and rkey nay vaze - - once they're elected che ma]or~:y vote cones fro3 : h e e1ec:or. a - d gei I? Once they Fer cerzl'led CF tha; roan that would allow camset;tlon and chat rhe common party rrenoers were not allcweo to conpete because 1 : December 15tk, they can v o : e So ihai there : s So, ~ r : o : h e r for i l n o T n e : , e r they h k e . no bargzils. r~ofds,rhe wzs all done on the THE COURT: ? o : e r s rnslde and then 3y rne tire, ln other words, there was n o ~ o d yon the ballor i.>hlchwas, from a party standpoint, which was or. electicn dsy vcce for che elecrors. 13R. SIRii:<: For the elecior's slare, representatLve of rhe v a s : common parry memers. rna~orltyof the yes. THE COURT: 13R. STAWNK: Okay. B2t they h a e 7 . 0 cho~ce. T%E COURT: Jaybird is the o7.e w.0 the surt Has bro~ght a ; a r C s : ? In o i k r uords, rnose who ran In rhe ?rlnzry, In a ~ h e rwards, :-sy're m, ST3m6: Terry v . Adams rr! Texas. exclrded ena he Texas' a 3epurl-c and s ~ l l l n l s the aalll~y to secede. It's a Resublic const1;utlon a - d party lnslders tave 1 t ovfr a ; d c;!rp,rlsor i am mzkrng to : h e chat's the Jayalrd it was, next to Georgia, the nost -THE COURT: Jayblrd. What was the la-dsu-r tnere, who brought Dfmocratx P a r : y by =hi %creme 15th 'menanent . s : r u z : u r s wnrch was found JUST a rnlnute. I ' m stlll at Courr co be a vlolarior of ihe . - Jai~blrd? -., 14R. GT-ER: Thznk you, Your Honor. >a. STR'JTIK: 1 : $was bro~gh: by s - - Nothlng I4r. Sirunl; has s a ~ d so far ras anythlqg to 30 wlrh =he specla1 reftrr~nc c n a n e g r o 'later wlo wss of the some party a - d trat 2% %as -- he uas saylng proceedings, wltk cie roilon :hat Your Honor. ' r The Fremlse of e -ot:an 1s rs ~ e i o r e that he was ~ r a b l it, put somebody or, ;he ballcr otk,er tha?. rh? ins-ders who were ;cld Ir '4: 1 0 that 5~3p doxg ~ t . electors are publlc officers and that for those elecIors wic are p s l ~ c offlcers 1n some other capacity. there 1s a conflrct of interest as beiween rhelr rwo roles. The problen wl;n thls premise 1 s rhls 1s the same party zomlng b;ck nlne years later o : :ontime on ~ h l s sort of inner sanz'.m of the pll;tocrazy whlch contrcued ro pacK ;he ger-erai eLertran b~l10~~. Whether or n3r 1rc1,:ded tt.ey &re LO 3 that ~t's false. ZlecIors are not publlc offlcers. Black man can be Sectlon two of the ?u!ollc O i f ~ c e r ' s Law deflnes who 1s a prblrc offrcer. THE CC-mT: Z; vote In z prlrary, ihzr's '41, prevecied from votlng even ;hob;h Zgfeec to :hat. He sald they were Deaocracs. THE COURT: Tke ouestlo: was whetner a chat Ir excludes elecrors. xowever, he : s polntlng Lo the Federal Constrtutlon rr f o u r of flre of his mot103. Black mar can %ate : c '43. STRUKX: the prirary. In the prriary to wr.lch MR. G m i ? : or thls rnotlon or Thaz's not the contentron 1 - k . e rs a rrenber a ? . @ chat tzere was an inner qrouplng wltnln tre party that were ccntro1lp.q the overall d~rec:loc 3f the party rl gexsral. rh~s ~roceedlcgsas a wt.ole as to wherher ihey're Federal Publlc Officers. lt We haven't bzleied that because papers. isn't rn the r . o r . n g THE COURT: I neard eFo;gh. m. STRINK: four iionor, I have it ln my affidavit In s~ppor:. Nhat do ycu -aae to say? PiOCET3INGS Nay I r e a d THE COURT: It. ) : 1 can vcce f o r whomever t h e y l ~ k e ,some >air a mlnure b e f o r e you r e a d e l e c t o r s a r e unoer o n t r a c t t o v o t e spec~f~ca1:y a s under s a n t r a c c wrth t h e Has any c a s e d e a l t wrth what 1 s considered an o f f l c e o r t r ; s r mean, an o f f l c e 3C M R . STRWK: Stare per s e . P.s t h e S i a i e of Yew 'fork, t h e y ' r e not ucder contract. There r z an e A e r e n t of t r ~ s t or p r a f l t ? EYEST What does i t or proflt? S o ~ e b o d ywho 1 s rn a because t h e y a r e o a i l c a l l y p a r t y members. k-~d alchough t h e y z r e S r a r e officers a s d e l l p o s l t l o n r o speak f o r r h e l n t e r e s t of i h e S z a t e o r f o r -THE COURT: Wry d l d q ' t l t l u s t s a y zs a p a r t y rnenber, Yrrs ;s a system run ~ y t h e i ~ malo= o partles. h o l d l n g an office, 2ald:ng a publlc o f f l c e ? What THE COURT: I Lmcerstand t h a t . =hat' So binat w h a t ' s an o f f ~ c eC ? t r u s t o r p z o f l t ? does l t mean? N o one has de:-ned t h e r e an; I : ? cormnen:ar:es t h a t ever? a t r h e t;me do you have t o s a y abou: !fR. GRRBER: Was they wrcie : r T s not a posrtlon of c h t p e o p l e a s a dn3le t r u s t wlth respect : c because t h e e l e c t o r s a r e d e s ~ g n a t e d ~y candldates. B. STRLKX: T3E COUXT: 1 c a n ' t speak t o t n a t . m d l n comecilor w-tt the prlnary t h a t was h e l d r?. Sepzember. =he var-ous p r e s l d e n t l a l caz3ldares deslgnated s l a t e s of e l e c t o r s who wire gcing t o r e p r e s e n t tnem i I doc': e-en know b a s i c a l l y what l t neans p e r s e . Y o u ' r e say;cc of'icer r n a r r c a t means any of t h e S t a t e ,who z e t s F a l o , bu: ~ t neans t h a t . I n t h e New York i l e c r o r a l 1 5 t h a r c a n d l d a r e should prevail I n t h e prlrnary. T h a t ' s t h e source of ~ h d ee-egates. Tne d e s l g n a i e d e l e c t o r s i n r h e c a s e of :he Dercocrats, S f n i i o r Obama, r t ' s 32 d o n ' t know tha: T h a t ' s i h e n ~ u b e rone. MR. STRWfi: 3 u : i t ' s certainly i n a p o s ~ t r o no f t r ~ s t ,tn-y a r e - - a l t t o u g h t h e y ?RCCZSDINCS p e r s o n s , me-mbers of :,e deslgnated a s e-eciors. TXE CCUXT: p'ubllc t h a c he prevailed r n :heir r e s p e c t r v e p a r t y prlmarles. The 31 e ~ e c t c r sd e s l g n a t e d by 31 e l e c r o r s t h a t we Iie. S e r a r o r 1 4 c C a m h a s S e n a t o r Oham3 + r e :he different elez:ors. MR. G : i B E R : a r e t a l k l n g about t h r s mornrng. Yss, acd Zhz o r h e r S e n a t o r Obarna's cr.o.ce They were and Obama *as t h e c a n d r d a t e s th;: s r e gs;ng r o oe on t n e D e m o c r a ~ r cv o t e r ' s i n o l c e l n Sep-,err$er. MR. STRmTK: Yoir Xocor, t h e p a r t y b a l l o t t o n a r r o s hcne c h t l r awn d e s l g n a t e d electors. MR. STRLNK: \1j r u l e s r e a l l y a r e - - j-ou czn w r l t e and s t a t e rebr::al to that, law based upor r h e a c r u a l r u l e s of t h e p a r t ; of ~ k parLy e a r e inconsistent and t h e r ~ l e s wlth t h e - - u1:h t h a t SwltCh from hhoe'J€r certalniy l f yo^ can f ~ n c anybody who was l c t h e o r l g l n i l p r l n a r y s l a i e on tb.e a a l l o t . I would a g r e e u ~ t k rhe g e n r l e n a n except f o r t h e f a c t t h e s e a r e ~ ? s i d e r swho have t a k e n over tne process. They're not lancer taken They a r e a :r's a b a r t and g e t s e l e c t e d r n r7.e prlrnary a.id dhc ends up I n t o t h e f m a l sl;:e T H E COURT: 3f c a n d i d a t e s . ~ a s i z a l l yt h e r e a r e okay. I :hLnk forward from t h e prrmary. d l f f e r e n r s e t of z e c p l e . swltch. T H E COURT: people? I 3 1 : B t h r e e p o l n r s y o u ' r e ms<:ng, % : One p e n t 1 s 1 t h e r e 1 s a conflict. different s e t 0' o r r l c e r s azd t t e r s 5 o r s t h e y c a r . ' t nave tiio off l c e s .- The o t h e r p o x : rs r h a r t h e y ' r e p l b l l c . rs a MR. C?ABl?: h c , r t ' s xo:, Your Eonor. .nmd rre t r l r d p o l z r 1 s t h a t :t.ere b a l t and s * r l t c n . I s t h a t c,rrect? i t ' s f o r t n e c a n d l a ~ r i z , t - e prlmary, presldentlal primary candldates desrgnsze t h e r r e l e c t o r s and rrhat rh-y have b e f o r e YOLT Honor t h l s n o r r r n g a r e t h e e l e c t o r s who PR. STRUNK: T3E COURT: M R . STRW: Yes, Your Honor. Jusr a m n ~ t e . Sc -- were d e s l g n a t e 3 by i5.e can31dates who PROCEEDINGS TIE COLRT: a confilc:. r c a t c3nfl:ct Eoes L e y ' s a s s u r e t h i r tt.ere 1 s 1 : swrtzh I n ;he se?.se t h a t r h e ~ e o p l e who were e l e c r e d c r l q l c a l l y a r e c o r 7r.e same ~ 0 0 ~ 1 an 53 1 t 1,lola:es t n e Sunrene C o , ~ r t T-a;'s t'he s a y anywhere ~ h - c p r o h ~ o ~ hl? t s from v o i l - g ? persjn Pnere does .t say char : ? i r u l t h a c o n e l i c t c;?': ~ o f U F l t e d SLates J a y b i r d c a s e . e n l r ? one. vote? n o t e chat r n e r e a r e o t h e r c a s e s 3 1 t I ' m s u r e t h a r :t deals l e u p o s ; ~ b l > - have a f o c r r h oce, cnac e l e c i o r s c a n ' t be, according co ir.2 Fcaer-1 C o n s t l t ~ t l o n , czn c e somecre #ha r-olds an oiille. T h a r ' s czs.cally -- i l t t . cunfl-cts, wlrh some s o r t of l a k . w t e r e does l t jay r t a t a person w l r t a c c n f l l c t c a n ' t - ~ e t e ? I*, .r. ~ r ' srm;-ar s to STam: :ne problem c o l t s r : tnac T n a r ' s proozbly wia a r e t h e y voclng f o r . I n o:her tt.e a r g ~ m e - r t F a r rh? S t a z r Law doisn'r allow. :.Ie words, acr,ebouy becomes a T - a t ' s w e r e I see y o ~ r argument. Denocrat p e r sf s o ~ h z tt h e y can d o t i l n -.rlmary. ;nd Who s a y s t h e r e r s a c o n f l ~ c : , , r can't be done? L e t ' s assume, I s e e rzlnisrerlal. 11 r h a t l e ' s t h e malor-ty p a r r y as e S t a t e f u n c ~ l c ns i n c e t ? e y ' r e con:rol.ng - n ? r e zi t ? e Gs-,.errment t h a t put f o r w a r d tire s l a t e . T H E COURT: agalr. l o l ' r e 3lx.ng :he argune-rs L e t ' s say ~ t ' a s Republican dho has t o cer::iy 2 Jemocrar. he e i e c c ; m r e s c l c s of for a a ~ ~ - . ~ c e . Tnere 1 s t h r e e , may32 f a ~ ~ r osslble L e r ' s a55um2 :hat argmenEi. m e , ;here ;s z c o n f l l c t . c r che c o n f l l c t . The o r n e r cne 1 s tha: s t a t e s you c a n ' t r.a.Je -- Tners rs s confllz:. I p r s s s e a you ox. K R . ST3IJNK: k r ' s s a y t n e r e was Xe i r e o r t h e second :ns Staye L a w q - e s c l o n , iie a r e on r 3 t h e q ~ e s t i o ? .of wtecher o r n o t somebody whc r s an e l e c c e r zan csrtlfy hmself. h o l d tllo p r S l l c offices. The e h ~ r d one 1s IC was a b a l t an0 T H E COURT: Wco s a y s ne can t ? L2:'s a s s m e t h e r e 1 s z c o n f l l c t a2 you s a y . :GI. STRWvA: policy, 11 you can 3 l c k h i r , l f t h e p a r t y l e a d e r can plck r t 'directly, :hen why c a n ' t t h e y make t h e e l e c t l o n I n a r~d5 0 chis f e d e r a l r h l n g b : o ' . l C 15, P o : o ~ t l a wlt 30 the questLon here y m steied tleri 1 s lr : n e TriE COURT: I Icn't knou wcat you're -- S : a t e referring to. Nelther the salary Yes. Co35t:cut:o~ cfflces. thi: yo2 can't hold : w o pdblic a. STRWL: i?ausi.I In the leglilarlve secrlo? I . a . STRUNK: As a federal, z s a federal l a . ST3UWK: c : artlcle t-ree of cne State Co:.stltatlor, an2 then uncer artrcle 13 offlcer, : h e elecror ; s pala, the Coverment would be -- the qovernor would be pald and ~t's in yrolatron of that specri;cally spec~!i=ally, hklCh -- 7dE COmT: YOU iant to show ir : o mi. zes. because he's recelvlng money that he houldn'c nornally be gettlcg as part of h ~ governor's s lob, whetner it be 2 tm. x x n m : .1.i. I Pas?. ) is : h e leg~slGtrve dollar, dlmrlmous, or S7R-JqK: 7 h : s 2008 per dlern. Y H T portlo?. On tte follo.%~nq page ~ n d e rartlcle 13, sever in regards ro shall have been elesred r.or shall he cr ske oe peld 3r COURT: Okay. Thz electors are not :n. C - m E R : recelvlng the 515 as publlc offrcers beta-se the Publlc Off~cersLaw srates that r e c e i v e , or the third l ~ n e , any ozher extra cornpensailon w h ~ c hgoes to what T3i COURT: ?%. -- they're not publlc oiilcers. Trey are rece:vlnq the money solely as eleclors. Where 1s : h s next or;? So ~t can't lrnpllcate any provision of the S : a t e Carst-t~tlorpertarnrng to plbllc YPRmT<: Naxt page over. iilghr kere. i1nd:catlng.l THZ CCURT: Selirer -- okay. officers. When article i5.ree. sectlcn seven, article three bexng ice 1eg;slaturs article iihlcr. of rhe Scate Ccnst-r~tion,that -e!rberz of tte leg-slaturt can': ?R,STRCnlK: Tne pub:-c would cover rhe governor. 3 flcer be appoir~edto any ocher office which 2-tall% compe-sation, lt doesrt concern the scatus of electors because elector 15 not a public office. . : n . d , of course, the second zolr:, the $15 declslon sefore the electlon or can tnis be rnade afLer tne elrcrlcn? YR. STSlmK: Well, certainly the questlon as to whet5er cr n o : rhe governor -- ~t goes to the Jayblrd p a r : ! z.;uarron. doesn'c ionstltute legally cognizable compensation. It's i~minrmous. General pubilc, I rr-ed ro get che legislator Ilsr. m. STR-UXK: Wtzre artlcle 12 of che Electlon Law ceals 'dleh afLer -- Defore and afrer they've been certrfled, so 1 : ' s deallcg wzrh the quesrron of the oehavror and tne jab 05 =he cer:~f;ed offlcel aL thi: pox: elector as a federal They nave tnfse lnslcers rome addressel, publlrh adcresses, 'relr t:?ey aldn'r .da-t : o ?u311si- ~t and make : t avarlable to rce gsreral publlc, we d o z t know who we're oorrng - - whlch the THE COURT: My questlon ls, d3es it have to be done before the electlon? That's the questron. %, c o ~ ~ p t r o l lsays e ~ ho.~ ~ u c hihey'ri to be pald anc ihe Secrerary Of State cerclfles ihac. Trat's 110. So thls 1s t P . e State paylng the elector who 1s covere3 as a federal ofiicer a : polnc, rhe payment ci zoney. 1 : ' s thai STR-UbM: Trere shculd have been -- aosolutely, the electicn's halfway over. o r It's absenyee aa-lo: : : w o weeks. dlgitaied. THE COURT: CEn : ? i s be decrdec before It's a pass off from ihe Siate ro the offlclal pcsltlon ' a the federal the elector's voce or coes xt have to ae done today? - as the assem3lage of the Electoral College which 1s CIP. STRmJK: : c T2E COURT: Xhy? s r o u i be ceclded row. przsected to ibc 1suse. TdE COURT: Whzr else? m. are. STImJK: Because tne general Is ic Lmparzzn: char tnrs rnz7.g be done popu-at~onshould know who rne electors aefore the electlo?. : h a c I have : o rake 2 I I n p r e v m u s e l e c t l o r s . t h e y vcted f o r t h e s l a t e of = . l e c t o r s . n o t t h e c a s e tha: absol-tely. ~t k.d 1 t 15 IS L e t ' s assume rhaL you c l a m t h a t l t s a b a l t and s w l r c h . KR. G-ER: :iA:r a l l due r e s p e c t , absolutely a salt and s w ~ t c h i h e y ' r e vatlng -t's To r h h k :hat December -THE CC-URT: f o r KcCaln o r Elasn, L h e y ' r e n o t , 1r. f a c t I t 1 s absoluril-: mls:rforratlx t?.e g e n e r a l po~-lzr.o: positlon to Yes, I made an e r r o r . So now I a g r e e wltP. y o l , i L ' s b a l t and s u l t c t , t y p o t h e t ~ c e l l y ,Jayb:rd S'lpreae Court and p r m o t e s t n e of t i e Jaybird 3ernocrarlc P a r t y d e c l s l o n 1 s or. a l l i o ; ~ ' s n)ipothetlcall!i. No= iihat? % r e you ~rslders. T h a t ' s w h a ~t h l s 1 s r e a l l y a l l a b o u t . Rnd t h e f a c t t h a r t".y d~dc't publlsh the go-rq i o chaxge t h e e l e c t ~ o n T h e y ' r e g o r g t o -- :hey They d o n ' t have tlrne t o p c l l , the p o l l s . n a r e s s e p a r a t e from r t e a d d r e s s e s , i t a k e - T H E COURT: hick l€:'s have t l n e t o do t'at? do t h a t . contrast l t . A s s w , ~ r . gI cez-de ~t today anc b e f o r e November 1 5 t h wnere w o u ~ a:he t h e d i f f e r e n c e be? what would hap?ec? I: - - where would today, s e a l l y iihatever I do I n essence, ~ t ' r d o e s n ' t make a d - f f e r e c c e t o d a y . MR. STR-W: Yodr Hacor, t h e elgh: I cec:dea aays : d e c ~ c e df o r you, ago o r elch: days f r o 7 tomorrow was t h e l a s t -- l e t ' s s a y , h y p r h e r r c a l l y , what wobld happen? I t wodld be t o c l a r e zo change anything. c a t e whlch you can f 1 1 l v a c a n c i e s and T H E COURT: acymore. MR. STRUNK: Y O J Z a n ' t 5111 vacancies You c l d halt m t l l t h e l a s t T n a t ' s nor t r u e . seccnd s o n a t h r r g wculJ change. Rnc lf Accardlng t o t h e f e d e r a l law t h e f l l l l n g of a r y vacancy up t o r h s p o l n r t h a t t t e y ' r e t o I wcul3 decrde ~ t s e f o r e Noireher l E t h , yo^ know, wrarever happened, ~ t ' tso o l a t e vote -T H E COURT: Y o u can f r l l a vacancy PZOCSEDINZS c.-.tll Decenber 15zh? 1.R. STRUNK: g r v e a J u s r l c e cf t h e Suprame Court i u r l s d l c t r 3 n o v e r t h e matcer and I z r l n k - T X E COURT: So I have ] u r l s d : c t ~ o n . Yes, sir. Yes. You zan? ies, s l r . I f y o u c a r f r l l rr ;111 7FE COURT: : R '. T R m K : T3E COURT: m. STRUNK: T X E COURT: 7 r e q ~ e s t l o n1 s :>her. Lne Uecerroer l j r h , yo.. l u s t arswerea 7 y q u e s z i c n . So t h e ? , 1 1 d e c i s l a n h + s t o oe made. Does l r have t o be made 1 : . a rush Kanner l u s t o f f t t e c u f f , s e a t of t h e pants? So ~t can h e made l n 2 TOTE essence, there IS no u r g e r c y you're t-. t h l s because, z s s x n l r g :hat r l q h t , t h e n r h e rzcancy c a r be f i l l e d airerwards. Zm. STXWK: accoralng -- I t ' s up r o t h e l e g l s l a t d r e c e l l b e r a t e Tanner sc tr.at 1 5 t n e r e 1 s no difference a s t o whezher 1:'s ZssuT~lng r n a t D i ; t made rodzy THE COURT: 15 found -- acd si.irtch o r not b e l n g t h a t Ehe e l e c r o r s c a r be changed a f t e r w a r d s -- MR. SrRUNK: I d l d ~ ? . I S , I was bm. s;PuNK: correci. n..- I agree. That's absolutely + s s e n ~ i a l l y~ h r a w n 13 t h e b a r r e l e r g h r y e a r s ago o? a r o t a l l y u n r e l a t e d m a t t e r . _?3 I ?rr COLXT: Whcz ao yo1 have t 3 say? Certainly t h e r a c h l n e s was t o l d t r a t I i a c r o c o r e back b e f o r e rhe cLecclan f o r ~r r o 'ce p r o p e r l y c o n s r c e r e d . T I E COURT: MR. GRUER: have a l r e a d y been d e l i v e r e d zo t h e pc1llr.g places. T H E COURT: s o r t does:..'t aaKe a dec:slon I :USE L e t ' s assune t C a t y0.l had t o come back ~ e i o r e :he e l e c t l l c . The decrs;or r h e elsc::on d z e s n ' t have t o be b e f o r e Yod c a n ' t change anything, i lmay nor make a d l f f e r e - c e . b f s a u s t ~ t ' nsc s golnq t o make today, a l t h o u g h I may. IS any a ~ f t e r e r c e . 1G. Sr.2m.JK: @act -- ; x r e a l r z t l i more I ~ t l - k1 ~ ' essen:lal s ro argmenE cn w n a r ' s c o n s i d e r e d . I s a C o m ~ s s i o n e rof Deeds a p u o l l c off,cer? I43. ana vr-e p r e s l d e n r a r e specifically r e n t r o n e d STRUNT<: Yes, a c c o r d ~ n g:o A Comlss:oner -Dte5s .s a ana excluded. M . STRr>L<: LTnder a r i l c l e rwo. s?ct1o: T H E COU?T: ~ubllc off-cer? o: cwc, w h l c . 1 s e x c l b l t ilunnez e r q h t o r tt.e I d o n ' t know i f ~t does o r declarakior.. '.m. sWBE3: *. GFS3ER: I4R. STRLWX: d o e s n ' t , You; Honor. The S i a t e a r t l c i e 13 2 :n sect:cn two of t n f Nei York P U D ~ O ~ fC f l c e r ' s Law, Conmlsslorers of Deeds a r e n o t rnentloned a s p u b l l c ?f::csrs o r n o t , b i t e1;c:ors of p r e s ~ d e n tand o;ce i e g ~ s - a r r v e~ a c vo n s r d e r s (Fause. M R . STRWK: -- Ezc4 under a r t l c l e c t r e e , 1eg:slature p r e s l x n t a r e s p e c - : ~ c a i l y excluded by i h e leg~slacure. s e c t l o n sene?, no relnber of :he s h a l l , and 1 c s;ys 1eg:sLaiure Eeeds b-oveaer i h e ~iernher of of TH? COLRT: That's the polnt. maybe appolnLed Comlss:oner >.ssumlng t h e y a r e e x c i i d e a , you i o u l d rb.ick t h a r t n e Cor.xss;oner of Deeds, a e l n g . Nod C o ~ m s s ~ o n e of r Deeds 1 s a p u b l l c t h a c 1 c ' s 7 . o ~rnentlonea, 1 s a l s o excluded a n c t h e n t-.e q J e s t l o c 1 s wk.y does t h e Com.mssroner o 1 ; afircer ~oslcron because t h e y a c t u a l l y :dke r e s t s under rhe p u b l r c o f f i c e r law, p e r i e . So t h a t C o ~ ~ ~ s s l c of n e Deeds r an0 Notary, ,which a r e two different p o s l z l o n s , a r e ~ d c l : c offlzers. of f z c t . r n e y ' r e S i a t e Offlcers as a marter mentlo. Deeds h e r e , ~ h l c hi s , ; r e s s e n c e , noi a p u b l i c o f f l e e . I f 11's not a ~ , k l l c o f i l c e , t h e n :nac sor: o f c u t s l n t c ycur argllrnent t h a t ~ t ' s n o t a pub112 o f f l e e . One r h l n g 1 s c l e a r from Lhe MR. GWdER: t h a r ca? suorrac: Tyere r s n ' : any argument 3f Im. G m T R : d e f l n ~ t l o ns e c t l o n of t n e P u b l l c O f f l c e r ' s frcn section tso the I Law, t h a t C o m r s s i o n e r of Dteus a r e n 3 t P u b l l c O f f l c e r ' s Law, che e x c l ~ s L o nc f S:ectors. lio arqa-ent c a . . Ee IS no =omper.satloc. That's ihe q u e s l l o r . ~ s , T X E COURT: say-ng t h a t t h e h set~ ~ on m d e r r h e there He 1s s z y l n g , I n e s s e n c e , t h a t :c LS Sonstlt~tlon trumps i P l b l l c Offleer Law. I*. a 1eg:sla:cr. I z 1s a c l v l l o f i l c e p a i d m d e r :re s r a t e of and r n e y ' r e ?e;ilng New York. MR. T M E R : GFSBER: There ~ s n ' -i 50:. constlturlans. m. STR-mi(: I*. G'dBER: F:rst of a l l , c h l s a r g m e n t There 1 s " ' ~ a n y ~ h l r gI n that would 0:-y a p p l y t o =he members of t h e Second, t x s - Hang on, b ~ tth e r e a r e 11. tt-e Ne7b York S c a r e Cans:A:otlon prot.lDlts -- legislature. T H : I $ i l l 1 t e l l you h l s COU3T: ThE COURT: menters of t h e l e g i s l a t ~ r eon MR. a r g m e n t because I w a : . t SO -0 32: 1 : clezr STRLNK: Yes. There a r e ? Yes. JUS; h a r e on. I don1: know I h e a r ,your a r g m e r t , t h a r ' s 1-hy I ' m argument. 1eglslat:re be MR. GRmER: r4R. a e b a r r n g h's Sr3LINX: I f a -enber of :he T H E COUFT: elec~ec t o Congress o r apFcrnred t o any sfirce, C L V L ~ 1 , guess t t . 2 ~L S a C - v l l offlee, c r r n ~ l ~ r a u?der q :he Government of t h e dnr:ea S t a t e of 1;ei.j So, I h e a r h l s zrgurnent. u h l c h e l e c t o r s you a r e t a l k l n g a b o u t . L e t ' s t a l k akou: governor -5 the governor. 'he Stat-s, i n i c r l z ' s no:, or the ncz a member of t h e l e g r i l a t u r e . 3 s !was :he ?r;sldenof r h e York, so we nzve t a l k e d about MR. STRLTliX: l e g i s l a t o r appoi:.ted t h e 3ra:e ro a c ~ u - 1o f f ~ c ei n Senace. THE COURT: of Neh Yorh., o r n d s r acy C l r y that shall He was, b u t he l s n ' t . Rho governnent, r r s o r her acce?t:ng e l s e 1 s z member of r - e 1 e g ; s l a i u r e l v a c a t e cls o r s e a t ~r t h e l e q l s l e t c r e and thdy s p e c i f l z - l l y exclude Z o ~ n . l s s 1 o n e rOf Deeds o r any o f f r c e t h a t he o r she r e c c l v e m . STRIJNK: Assemoly, Tedesco 0:i t h e t o p of my "ead, t h e Y ~ n o r l T yLeaner o i t h e Speaker of t h e ;.sserrioly, ?iOCLXDINGS THE COURT: You ha-~e rt trere. Wrat are ZROCEEDINGS cocs-dered compensatlon, ro a e f n e coapensatlon? y3u shcwlnq ne there? YX. SUZBER: ? . close reading of t5e m.. S T i m a : accorclng to Bloomerg, he had to tzie z dollar In lleu ci the zctual salary thaz he hzs t3 be paid. If he wore 5-ct:on seven, article three, talks abou; members of the leg~slarare' CFkTX m Y ~ ~ s ~ I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, presen* a r e s i & m o F ; t h e ~ d b former natural-born Citizen status coniferred at n a t m d l&tk cnJ Z& I F - I that status being a private idkidpal United -C ? L& ? k Amendment to the United States C o n sir& ck5& mF 3 i k z - E h i W XlBI ZS q = - -- Rdstmz f ' barnna &BSb a I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk i n esse,i n r t e n d l to be accordance with Chapter 17-B of the State d W Y d k g d? h Release o f a power o f This Release renders null a d Poid any-E State of New York and or s u b f r k k h d @ . d ! % qf --\ - : q 4 -.,-..-.. ..... v I \. . I . .- . ...; .- I ' F k b b. --. ~bdrlarm~ww*--bJr. : Blus -raved harder and scale M h raised intagCb printing M u l r i q o b d *-,*t d d 4 ~lcr(,~rl~hdthewwds~ew~~~ityDspe;bnentd~ea~had~ Hygiene immedhtely above the boltom @y/ard W b k using rn mwitylng glass I \ + , \ . a * . __ S . -- - I , I COPY DEPUTY CU STATE OF NEW YO= SUBDIVISION COUNTY OF NEW YO& WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YO= / , .. - . - TO : STATE OF NEW YORK, Releasee 1 C/O THE CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK with Chapter 17-B New York State Estates, Powers and Ttusts Article 10 Section 9.2 Release o f a power o fa p w IN RE : USUFRUCT "CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK,' 'CI-DUSIOPHER E SIRUMLf Tfm51 FROM: Christopher Earl Strunk, in esse Releasor NOTICE OF m E molu:-r O C b B S I D ~ 0 9 Exhibit A - usvrp~v~rll)eed - x ~ - - ~ ~ ~ " r i h e Dated: --A ~ Y o 4 ~ Y t a c k r 1 - - \/' - E 3 k c 2 z m 3 a t 3?TF?+et%* - COPY LAMAR C ~ ~ ~ K ' G A - C ~ U R T DEPUTY CLlE STATE OF GEORGIA SUBDIVISION COUNTY OF LAMAR --. TO : STATE OF NEW YORK, Releasee C / OTHE CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF LM$AR STATE OF GEORGIA W W B 5 TOWN OF BARNESVILLE, GEORGIA with Chapter 17-B a f t b c b P d State Estates, Powers and Trusts Anticle 1 0 Section 9.2 R e k n s e ~ a ~ a f appointment Sub-Section (c) Such release may be delivered to any oft l w person, other than the donee, who might be advmsely af5ected by an exuc IN RE : USUFRUCT "CHRISTOPHER EARL S I R U h K ""CEIRZSTOPHER E SlMMK FROM: Christopher Earl Strunk, i n esse Releasor NOTICE OF RELEASE WR'HOWT C IO - Dated: Brooklyn, Hew Y o & October 2012 +* Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of OSC Exhibit 6 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County that this Petition requests expedited emergency equity relief with a CPLR §7805 injunction with a stay of New York Electoral College vote due by December 15, 2012 until the Court renders a declaratory judgment on the issues of law under CPLR §7806 regarding U.S. Constitution: Article 2 in its entirety, especially Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 3 (A2S1C3) as amended by the Article 7 Amendments the 12th , the 14th especially sections 3 and 4, the 20th, and the 25th ; further, especially as to the U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 5 (A2S1C5) term of art “natural born Citizen” (NBC) natural law issue versus the idiom “born a citizen” positive law created by the New York State Board of Elections (NYS BOE); further, the U.S. Constitution: Article 3 Section 3; Article 4; Article 6; and furthermore, related New York State law and regulations as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation as applies with use of NYS Civil Service Law §105, and that Petitioner seeks equity relief on six (6) issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the misapplication and misadministration of Public Officer acts as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and Decision as a matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the Article 78 Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641, and Complaint with Index No.: 2008 29642; and also, Petitioner challenges the New York U.S. Senate Election as void ab initio with U.S. Constitution Amendment 17 and NYS Constitution Article 3 §7 grounds; and that based upon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, with imminent irreparable harm as time is of the essence and without another forum for relief, alleges of captioned Respondents and related persons as follows: 1. Petitioner Christopher Earl: Strunk in esse, is a duly registered voter of the 64th Election District of the 57th Assembly District (AD) and within the New York 8th U.S. House District at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue – 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 for ten years with email: chris@strunk.ws and cell phone 845-9016767, and an enrolled member of the Republican Party who participated at the November 6, 2012 General Election there voted entirely for the Republican Party line of candidates with Wendy Long for US Senate. 2. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served his COMPLAINT OF ATTEMPT TO COMMIT A CRIME BY A PUBLIC OFFICER WITH NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST AN INJUNCTION IN KINGS COUNTY WITH DECLARATORY RELIEF AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter the “COMPLAINT”) upon the respective County District Attorney (DA) with jurisdiction over the domicile of residence of the Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 2 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College for a total of 29 members variously domiciled in Fourteen (14) Counties that are now duly elected without challenge on November 6, 2012, pending the NYS BOE final tally / canvassing by the end of November, all serve as public officer electors to cast their votes by December 15, 2012 and that then will be transmitted to the U.S. Senate President Joseph Biden in a joint seating of the new Congress on January 3, 2013 take their oath of office in the new Congress that there will select the next President / vice President of the United States (POTUS) according to the 12th and 20th Amendments of A2S1C3. 3. That the criminal COMPLAINT affirms of each Public Officer in each domicile therein quote: x [each] Elector as part of the slate for Barack Obama and Joe Biden at the State of New York November 6, 2012 General Election for choosing New York’s candidate for the office of President and Vice President of the United States (POTUS) by their vote cast by December 15, 2012; and that such Public Officers are to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college intending to vote for Barack Obama as if mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded by Article 2 Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995). That in addition to the foregoing, Affirmant based upon information and belief contends that Barack Obama is guilty of forgery, spoliation, concealment intimidation of witnesses and racketeering in the matter of his alleged Common Law citizen status as if a Native-born Citizen notwithstanding the allegiance status of his parents rather than a Natural Law Natural-born Citizen born on soil to married US citizen parents, nevertheless is a British Subject with dual allegiance at birth wherever that was to the minor US Citizen mother in wedlock to a majority aged British subject foreign alien student who then were duly divorced on March 20, 1964; and then when in the mother’s custody nd during her 2 marriage Barack Obama was adopted in Indonesia by his Indonesian Citizen stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, who gave the name “SOEBARKAH” according to the U.S. State Department record affirmed on the August 13, 1968 by Stanley Ann Soetoro; and thereafter as an Indonesian Citizen SOEBARKAH (aka Barry Soetoro) reentered the USA in 1971 alone without a US Passport to live with his grandmother who obtained foreign student funding, illegally obtained a stolen Social Security Number no later than 1980, forged a Selective Service filing dated 1980, and inter alia in furtherance of usurpation of the office of POTUS no later than April 25, 2011, according to more than three experts, forged a Long Form Certificate of Birth as if of Hawaii. That notwithstanding the citizenship status of Barack Obama, Affirmant contends that Barack Obama has multiple allegiances despite taking an oath owing exclusive allegiance to the United States, levies war against the People of the United States, adheres to their enemies al-Qaida, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, GÜLEN Movement and Iran against the People of the United States to establish the Caliphate from Thailand through Morocco, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason; and that any candidate elector and or public officer including … who would aid and abet Barack Obama in usurpation of office of POTUS is no less than guilty of misprision of felony, sedition and treason. x Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Based upon the foregoing subject there is a preponderance of evidence proving that the April 25, 2011 forged public document is for the purpose of usurping the POTUS, and that were any New York State Public Officer Electors to cast a vote aiding abetting each crime the civil servant would be an accessory after the fact to a felony under New York Penal Law; and as such Affirmant provides due notice hereby as a matter of standing guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, NYS Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2381 through §2390 and related law, including but not limited to N.Y.S. Election Law § 16-100, N.Y.S. CPLR § 7202 and N.Y.S. Civil Service Law § 105 as applies to any public officer misapplication and administration of laws; the same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and rd belief are as follows: 3 parties, books and records, and personal knowledge. “ 4. That the respective County DA with jurisdiction over crimes of electors in each of fourteen counties are: P. David Soares Albany District Attorney; Robert T. Johnson The Bronx District Attorney; Frank A. Sedita, III Erie District Attorney; Charles J. Hynes District Attorney of Kings; Sandra Doorley District Attorney of Monroe; Kathleen M. Rice District Attorney of Nassau; Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. District Attorney of New York; William J. Fitzpatrick District Attorney of Onondaga; Francis D. Phillips District Attorney of Orange; Richard A. Brown District Attorney of Queens; Thomas J. Spota District Attorney of Suffolk; Gwen Wilkinson District Attorney of Tompkins; Kevin C. Kortright District Attorney of Washington; Janet DiFiore District Attorney of Westchester; and act independently of this civil action. 5. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner duly served a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE AN ARTICLE 78 PETITION WITH AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING A DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ON ISSUES OF LAW AS TO ELECTORS (hereinafter known as the “NOTICE”) upon the respective County District Attorney with jurisdiction over the domicile of residence of the respective Public Officer member of the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties got Notice that stated quote: “Please take notice of Petitioner’s intent to file an order to show cause application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on Monday November 19, 2012 for a preliminary injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment on issues of law; e.g., Are public officers to be held liable as accessories to felonies in usurpation of Office of POTUS and Ballot access? Are public officers presented with the facts of Barack Obama ineligibility able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?” x x Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 3 of 20 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 4 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 6. On November 9, 2012, Petitioner had a person not a party to this suit serve a copy of the COMPLAINT and NOTICE upon the New York 2012 Presidential Election Cycle Electoral College Members for a total of 29 members in Fourteen (14) Counties individually as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 Gerald D. Jennings of 1135 New Scotland Road -- Albany, NY 12208 George Gresham 1313 East 233rd Street -- Bronx, NY 10466 Ruben Diaz, Jr. of 820 Boyton Avenue, #6D -- Bronx, NY 10473 Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street -- Buffalo, NY 14208 Felix Ortiz 189 B 33rd Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11232 Hakeem Jeffries 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 Bill DeBlasio of 442 11th Street -- Brooklyn, NY 11215 Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road -- Rochester, NY 14610 Joseph Morelle of 133 Deerfield Drive -- Rochester, NY 14609 Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 Walter Cooper 150 West 96th Street, #I2G -- New York, NY 10025 Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002 Keith L.T. Wright of 2225 Fifth Avenue -- New York, NY 10037 Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A -- New York, NY 10001 William Thompson of 106 West 121st Street -- New York, NY 10027 Scott Stringer of 155 West 71st Street, #3A -- New York, NY 10023 Emily Giske of 440 West 24th Street -- New York, NY 10014 Scott Adams of 11 Poplar Avenue -- Orchard Park, NY 14127 Stephanie Miner 102 Woodside Drive -- Syracuse, NY 13224 Mario Cilento 3 Isabel Road -- Orangeburg, NY 10962 Anne Marie Anzalone 2827 48th Street -- Astoria, NY 11103 Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 Archie Spigner of 11210 175th Street -- Jamaica, NY 11433 Steve Bellone 107 Vanderbilt Avenue -- West Babylon, NY 11704 Irene Stein 101 Brandywine Drive -- Ithaca, NY 14850 Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street -- Middle Granville, NY 12849 Ken Jenkins 108 Bushey Avenue -- Yonkers, NY 10710 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County AS AND FOR THE FIRST QUESTION THE NEW YORK ELECTION OF KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND TO US SENATE IS VOID AB INITIO AS THE ELECTOR QUALIFICATIONS ARE NOT EQUAL TO THAT OF THE NEW YORK ASSEMBLY 8. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 7 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that as and for the first question the New York election held November 6, 2012 of Kirsten Gillibrand to the U.S. Senate from New York is void ab initio as to elector qualifications are not equal to that of the New York Assembly . 9. Petitioner seeks to overturn New York’s U.S. Senate election with U.S. Const. Amendment 17 “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures. ..” as the November 6, 2012 election for U.S. Senator from New York between Democrat Candidate Kirsten Gillibrand and Republican Candidate Wendy Long was conducted for electors not meeting the qualifications of a member of the Assembly with State Constitution Article 3 Section 7: “. No person shall serve as a member of the legislature unless he or she is a citizen of the United States and has been a resident of the state of New York for five years, and, except as hereinafter otherwise prescribed, of the assembly … district for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election; … or member of assembly at the first election next ensuing after a readjustment or alteration of the … assembly districts becomes effective, a person, to be eligible to serve as such, must have been a resident of the county in which the senate or assembly district is contained for the twelve months immediately preceding his or her election. …” (Emphasis added by Petitioner) 10. In addition to the above listed State Officers, Petitioner has also been barred from filing any further 7. That Petitioner has been barred from filing any further suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M. suit without leave by the Order of Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYSBOE et al Schack J.S.C. in the fraud complaint Strunk v NYS BOE et al Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of Index No.: 2011-6500 under penalty of contempt against other Public Officers and State entities: contempt against Public Officers: x x x x Andrew M. Cuomo of 138 Eagle Street -- Albany, NY 12202 Tom DiNapoli of 100 Great Neck Road -- Great Neck, NY 11201 Eric Schneiderman 645 West End Avenue, #8F -- New York, NY 10025 Sheldon Silver of 550 Grand Street, #5A -- New York, NY 10002 x x x The New York State Board of Ellection and its agents The New York Secretary of State City of New York among many other persons; as such named Public officers and agencies are not included herein unless by leave to do so, Petitioner wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and ask the Governor set a special election, because a significant number of the electors casting their respective vote were domiciled in New York for less than ; and therefore, such named Public officers are not included herein unless by leave to do so. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 5 of 20 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 6 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County fives years and had not lived in their respective county of domicile for at least twelve months and there is no way to determine from the votes cast on Novemebr 6, 2012 of those qualified what candidate was voted for. 11. That Petitioner’s right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; are and would be infringed were the election of US Senator not held void ab initio and that a new special election held; and therefore, public officers yet name along with Respondent Kirsten Gillibrand of 15 West 26th Street, Suite 4R, New York, NY 10010 with her present place of business at Washington, DC Office 478 Russell Washington, DC 20510, as a public officer has infringed my rights and acted contrary to the law of the land with those yet named as each Respondent must either be sanctioned and barred from office and a new special elelction arranged for qualified elelctors as soon as possible. 12. In addition to the US Senate Election, regarding the POTUS Election there are five (5) categories of elector public officers who are the respondents herein that each of whom have separate and or combined issue questioned specifically as to each member of the respective categrory or jointly, and that based upon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Petitioner respectfully alleges a question of law issue as to the captioned Respondents within each category of those public or quasi public officers with fiduciary duty who were notified of an accessory crime in which each participates in, especially if their respective vote is cast as an elector are : a. The Electors who are Public Officers elected to Congress duty as to matter of law and facts. b. The Electors who are Public Union trustees have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts. c. The Electors who are Registered Lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matter of law and facts. d. All the Electors as Public Officers when notified of crime have duty as to the law and facts. e. The Elector private person as an Elector Public Officer duty as to matter of law and facts. Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 14. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7802 as to captioned Parties of electors listed herein in part is in keeping with the definition of "body or officer", and the expression "body or officer" that includes every court, tribunal, board, corporation, officer, or other person, or aggregation of persons, whose action may be affected by a proceeding under this article; and that Petitioner contends that Respondent Electors have maliciously acted contrary to the prohibition in favor of another and where this proceeding is brought to restrain the Electors individually and as a body or officers from proceeding without or in excess of jurisdiction in favor of another, the latter shall be joined as a party; and that Petitioner understands that other interested persons in adequately represented by Petitioner actions herein by order of the court may direct that notice of the proceeding be given to any person, and may allow other interested persons to intervene were it not to prejudice the emergency nature of this action. 15. In addition to the above question Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7803 raises Questions that may be raised in a proceeding under this article that are as follows: AS AND FOR THE SECOND QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS HAKEEM JEFFRIES AND GRACE MENG AS TO NEW U.S. HOUSE MEMBERS AND ELECTORS WITH A DUTY AS TO A MATTER OF LAW AND FACTS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AS SUCH PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED ARE BARRED ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE REVIEW AFTER JANUARY 2, 2013. 16. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 15 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers Respondent Hakeem Jeffries and Respondent Grace Meng as to new U.S. House members and Electors with a duty as to matter of law and facts are in conflict with U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 paragraph 2, i.e. A2S1C2 states “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of 13. That Petitioner pursuant to the requirements of CPLR §7801 as to the nature of proceeding for relief Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be by writ of mandamus or prohibition that shall be obtained in a proceeding under this article is made for a writ or order of prohibition, in which such reference shall, so far as applicable, be deemed to refer to the proceeding authorized by this article. entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.” as such persons similarly situated are barred Electoral College vote review after January 2, 2013. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 7 of 20 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 8 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 17. Other than U.S. Constitution Article VI it does not specify the form of oath a Congressman is to take Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 21. Respondent Grace Meng of 14714 34th Avenue -- Flushing, NY 11354 is a American lawyer holding an office of trust and profit and is a member of the New York State Assembly, representing the 22nd assembly district in Flushing, Queens, New York, and pending the final tally and canvassing by the end of November will also be the Elected member of the United States House of Representatives from the New York 6th House District. 22. That the Respondent Grace Meng as a House member takes her oath to uphold the State and U.S. Constitution before Janaury 3, 2013, and then intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to review her own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 to do so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner. 23. That arguendo re A2S1C2, “but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector“ use is still with the original meaning and intent despite the addition of the 12th , 14th , 16th and 20th Amendments notwithstanding; and that the original use before ratification of the 14th amendment considered each State of the several States was sovereign and not subservient to the USA in regards to the enforcement of the Bill of Rights applied to the Federal entity that was properly termed these United States not as now termed after ratification of the `14th Amendment (1868) became the singular United States, as each State of the several States became and now remain subservient along with every state citizen therein placed under USA jurisdiction per se; and 24. Further arguendo re original use of A2S1C2, “but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector“ includes any state officer and or public officer accordingly, and that the same meaning for “Senator” who was appointed by the “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” and was a function of the respective state and federal law as in New York State Public Officer Law §10 requires every public officer to take and file an oath or affirmation prior to the discharge of any of their official duties and to be certified to the clerk of the respective body . The form of the oath or affirmation is set forth in Article XIII, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution ( 1 ) 18. That Petitioner’s understanding of the Decision and Order of Justice Schmidt referenced above is that a New York Electoral College Elector is merely a private person not required to take an oath in New York or elsewhere to uphold the State or Federal Constitution and as such may vote as a private person. 19. That Petitioner’s New York State Assembly Representative of the 57th AD is presently Respondent Hakeem Jeffries of 35 Underhill Avenue, #2A -- Brooklyn, NY 11238 and pending the final tally and canvassing by the end of the month of November will also be the Elected member of the United States House of Representatives from the New York 8th House District 20. That Respondent Hakeem Jeffries intends as a House member to take his oath to uphold the State and US Constitution on Janaury 3, 2013, intends to sit in the joint session of Congress thereafter to review his own and other votes as an elector as a second bite of the apple despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 to do so; and intends so despite that Respondent has been given notice by Petitioner. 1 NYSC ARTICLE XIII Public Officers [Oath of office; no other test for public office] Section 1. Members of the legislature, and all officers, executive and judicial, except such inferior officers as shall be by law exempted, shall, before they enter on the duties of their respective offices, take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of ......, according to the best of my ability;" no other oath, declaration or test shall be required as a qualification for any office of public trust, except that any committee of a political party may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any such committee, and a state convention of a political party, at which candidates for public office are nominated, may, by rule, provide for equal representation of the sexes on any committee of such party. (Amended by Constitutional Convention of 1938 and approved by vote of the people November 8, 1938.) respective State legislature before the 17th Amendment as the representative of the respective State is then and now intended to equate that relationship to every House member even though elected by State Citizens privileged to vote, and therefore also equates to every “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” too, and therefore includes every Public officer, in any state or federal jurisdiction, all except a private person per se; and. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 9 of 20 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 10 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 25. Furthermore arguendo re the issues of Law with Facts pertaining to the misapplication and misadministration of Public Officer acts in 2012 as relate to the December 5, 2008 Order and Decision as a matter of State Law heard by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. at I.A.S. Part 1 in the Article 78 Petition with Kings County Index No.: 2008-29641 as a matter of the Federal Law of the Land A2S1C2 still un-amended is that the only interpretation of State law involved in the Order and Decision of December 5, 2008 by the Honorable David I. Schmidt J.S.C. must be in keeping with the exclusive power, McPherson v. Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County AS AND FOR THE THIRD QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE THE ELECTORS WHO ARE PUBLIC UNION TRUSTEES WHO HAVE A FIDUCIARY DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE POTUS ELIGIBILITY QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AND ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THEIR MEMBERSHIP AND PEOPLE OF NEW YORK Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), of the New York State Legislature in its plenary formation of the New York 28. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 27 electoral college may not change the meaning of A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 at best would have to be a retiring with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who are the public officer to serve as an elector but make any “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” after January 2, of the year following the general election of the POTUS ineligible and as such the member of the respective Electoral College is to be a private U.S. Citizen under Federal jurisdiction as an elector is a public officer per se who votes by no later than December 25, 2012 every four years and when the joint seating of Congress convenes on January 3, 2013 the next year and every four years thereafter until there is a amendment to the quasi Federal officer status of an elector means that without an amendment, no State and or Congress may change the eligibility requirements of a Federal officer includes the elector as well as that of POTUS with A2S1C5, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995). 26. A State Officer and local officer as public officers hold an office of trust, and that persons registered with a privilege from the State such as an attorney, union trustee, lobbyist hold an office of trust for profit. 27. That were Respondents Grace Meng, Hakeem Jeffries and or anyother person similarly situated according to A2S1C2 who are officers of the State while acting as electors and as persons holding an office of trust or profit to review their own vote in Congress after Janaury 2, 2013 and also be an elector would infringe Petitioner’s right to suffrage, a republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; and therefore, Respondents acts as public officers is and would be contrary to the law of the land as each Respondent must either be barred from voting or office and or if done be referred for criminal action. electors who are public union trustees have a fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to their membership and People of the State of New York. 29. That Respondent George Gresham is a incumbent elected President of 1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college. 30. That Respondent George Gresham is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elelctor tovote by Decmber 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner. 31. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a incumbent elected President of the New York State AFL-CIO by the organization's Executive Council to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college. 32. That Respondent Mario Cilento is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 11 of 20 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 12 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by December 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner. 33. That Respondent Scott Adams is a incumbent elected director of UAW Region 9 with Local 686 Local 774 Local 1069 Local 1097 Local 2300 Local 3303 to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 34. That Respondent Scott Adams is a registered fiduciary operating with the state of New York as a quasi Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by December 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner. 35. That were Public Union Fiduciary Respondents and any other similar representative similarly situated to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe Union member trust and similarly private US citizens like Petitioner’s right to suffrage, republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty; and therefore, their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal from their office and or disbanning the respective union and return of alll union member funds. Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County A2S1C5 and are in conflict with A2S1C2, are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the People of the State of New York 37. That Respondent Emily Giske is a incumbent government affairs specialist based in New York with extensive experience in Albany and New York City. She has lobbied for corporations, financial institutions, not-for-profit entities and local municipalities including Las Vegas gambling interests lobbyist to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college. 38. That Respondent Emily Giske is a lobbyist with the state of New York as a qusai Public Officer as a “Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit” who has a conflict of interest as an elector despite the prohibitition by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 to do so; and intends to proceed as an elector to vote by Decmber 15, 2012 despite Notice to Respondent by Petitioner. 39. That were a Lobbyist registered in New York and any other similar representative similarly situated to cast a vote a POTUS candidate that is not eligible for POTUS would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty. And therefore their action as public officers is contrary and should lead to removal of Respondents license, order fines levied under State Lobbying law, and crimnal investigation. AS AND FOR THE FOURTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO ARE THE ELECTORS WHO ARE REGISTERED LOBBYISTS HAVE FIDUCIARY DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ARE QUASI PUBLIC OFFICERS WITH A FIDUCIARY DUTY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE POTUS ELIGIBILITY QUALIFICATIONS OF A2S1C5 AND ARE IN CONFLICT WITH A2S1C2 AND ARE BARRED FROM SUCH VOTE AS A BREACH OF A FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 36. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 35 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who are the AS AND FOR THE FIFTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO also are AN ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY NOT VOTE FOR WHOM THEY WISH BY CHANGING THE ELIGIBILITY OF POTUS. 40. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 39 with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that all public officers holding more than one public officer job for pay excluding a commissioner of deeds or notary public with a fiduciary duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications are in conflict with A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 and are barred from such vote as a breach of a fiduciary duty to the People of the State of New York; and Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 14 of 20 electors who are registered lobbyists have fiduciary duty as to matters of law and facts are quasi public officers with a fiduciary duty attempt to change the POTUS eligibility qualifications of Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 13 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 41. That each Elector is mandated by the State of New York legislature with exclusive power afforded by A2S1C2 and A2S1C5 with use of New York State Election Law and related rules, McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), with the proviso that no Public Official may change the eligibility and or qualification requirements of a federal officer including that of office of POTUS, U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995) as apply to each respondent below: 42. That Respondent Robert Duffy is the incumbent 76th Lieutenant Governor of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 43. That Respondent Keith L.T. Wright is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly from the 70th district to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 44. That Respondent Stephanie Miner is a incumbent 53rd Mayor of the city of Syracuse New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 45. That Respondent Sheila Comar is a incumbent elected Executive committee chair of the New York State Democratic Committee to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 46. That Respondent Joseph Morelle is a incumbent member of the New York State Assembly representing the 132nd Assembly District, which includes eastern portions of the City of Rochester and the Monroe County suburbs of Irondequoit and Brighton to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 47. That Respondent Christine C. Quinn is a incumbent Speaker of the New York City Council representing District 3 to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 48. That Respondent Ruben Diaz, Jr. is a incumbent President of the Borough of the Bronx in New York City to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 49. That Respondent Ken Jenkins is a incumbent Westchester County 16th District legislator, and was elected again Chairman of The Board of Legislators to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 50. That Respondent Steve Bellone is a incumbent Suffolk County Executive to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County 51. That Respondent Felix Ortiz is a incumbent representing New York's 51st Assembly District to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 52. That Respondent Anne Marie Anzalone is a incumbent appointed Chief of staff to Representative Joe Crowley of the 7th New York Congressional District to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 53. That Respondent William Thompson is a incumbent selected by the NYS Governor to head NYC's Battery Park City Authority to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 54. That Respondent Scott Stringer is a incumbent 26th Borough President of Manhattan to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 55. That Respondent Bill DeBlasio is a incumbent New York City elected official, holding the citywide office of New York City Public Advocate to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 56. That Respondent Byron Brown is a incumbent mayor of Buffalo, New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 57. That Respondent Gerald D. Jennings is a incumbent mayor of Albany, New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 58. That Respondent Archie Spigner is a incumbent District Leader for the 29th A.D. - Part A, and Executive Member of the Guy R. Brewer United Democratic Club to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 59. That although the following public officers are being questionably protected by the enormity of Justice Schack invidious infringement of Petitioner basic rights otherwise protected by the US Constitution and 14th Amendment guarantees and related State law with an order and decision taken on appeal case 20125515 filing pending, the following public officers would be effected by a Court decision herein as follows: a. That Andrew M. Cuomo is a incumbent 56th Governor of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote. Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 15 of 20 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 16 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County b. That Tom DiNapoli is a incumbent 54th Comptroller of the state of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded to vote. c. That Sheldon Silver is a incumbent Member of the New York State Assembly from the 64th district and speaker of the assembly to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college and was notified of POTUS ineligibility as the NYS Attorney General and an Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County AS AND FOR THE SIXTH QUESTION AS TO PUBLIC OFFICERS WHO AS THE ELECTOR PRIVATE PERSON WITHOUT ANOTHER PUBLIC OFFICE AS AN ELECTOR PUBLIC OFFICER ALSO HAVE DUTY AS TO MATTERS OF LAW AND FACTS BUT ABSENT A VIOLATION OF LAW MAY VOTE FOR WHOM THEY WISH. 64. Petitioner repeats each and every allegation contained in the Introduction and paragraphs 1 thru 63 elector in the 2008 Electoral College proceeded anyway to vote. with the same force and effect as though herein set forth at length; and that public officers who as the d. That Eric Schneiderman is a incumbent 65th Attorney General of New York to participate as a Elector private person without another public office as an Elector Public Officer also have duty as to matters member of the State of New York electoral college of law and facts but when absent a violation of law may vote for whom they wish. 60. That all the above named Public Officer Respondents as the body and or its officers with 65. That Respondent Irene Stein is a candidate past super delegate in the 2008 Democratic presidential the expressed exception of private US Citizens as electors that failed or are about to perform a duty enjoined upon it by the law of the land as to the requirement to conform to U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Paragraph 5 as to the eligibility requirements for any candidate for the office of the POTUS; and 61. That the named Respondents as the body and or its officers that proceeded, and is nomination and wife of Peter Stein the Tomkins County legislator for the 11th District to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 66. That Respondent Walter Cooper is a candidate in an individual capacity as a citizen of New York to participate as a member of the State of New York electoral college 67. The Elector private person as a US Citizen without another public office as an Elector Public Officer also have duty as to matter of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of governement, Freedom and Liberty. proceeding or is about to proceed without or in excess of jurisdiction to allow violation of NBC Eligibility ; and 62. That the named Respondents as the body and or its officers that proceeded, and is proceeding or is about to proceed despite the warning of the misprision of felony sedition and treason are to be referred for criminal investigation and removal from office under New York Civil Service Law Section 105; 63. That Respondent public officers as Elector Public Officers have duty as to matter of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due the People of New York as similarly to Petitioners right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom and Liberty. WHEREFORE, Petitioner wishes a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction hearing, and Declaratory judgment under CPLR §7806 and permanent injunction against the Respondents of each category and such other relief as the Court deems just including a TRO Order: a. A hearing on the legal issues as to the void ab initio US Senate Election in New York.. b. A hearing on the issues of facts as to forgery, sedition and treason. c. A hearing on the issues of the actual historical meaning of Natural Born Citizen held by the State of New York from before and after the 1776 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 17 of 20 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s PETITION Page 18 of 20 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of OSC Exhibit 7 Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of OSC Exhibit 8 (88) Timeline Photos https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152222524855725&set=a.... Search for people, places and things Chr Timeline Photos Back to Album · Donald J. Trump's Photos · Donald J. Trump's Page Previous · Next Donald J. Trump Press release. Video response to follow. Like · Comment · Share · November 1 Pamela Barnett, Linda Bentley and 16,445 others like this. 2,955 shares Album: Timeline Photos Shared with: View Larger Download Report/Remove Tag Public 1 of 2 11/14/2012 9:25 PM (88) Timeline Photos https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152222524855725&set=a.... Chr Donna Tryon And there is another explanation, the truth, for this: he did produce the documents, they are real, and Mr. Trump just hasn't followed through on his offer and never will because he refuses to let go of his delusions about Pres. Obama. 23 hours ago · Edited · Like · 3 Brett Abrams no 22 hours ago · Like William Chapman We Stand Behind you...This is the Most Nefarious Individual in the U.S. Today Donald...Yes, the Majority needs to march on D.C. Soon! 10 hours ago · Like Rj Parsons wanted to let you know about a new petition I created on We the People, a new feature on WhiteHouse.gov, and ask for your support. Will you add your name to mine? If this petition gets 25,000 signatures by December 14, 2012, the White House wil... See More 8 hours ago · Like Michelle Matherne You are an idiot, Mr. Trump, You rail about China stealing the US manufacturing jobs, yet your Macy's line of ties are all made in China! You come off as an ignorant buffoon. YOU LOST, get over it. 5 hours ago · Like Yolita Mogollon de Ripoll Trump is such an idiot that he doesn't know that if you are a foreigner it is harder to get financial aid for college, it is almost imposible you have to find a scholarship because you cannot get it via the government. 9 minutes ago · Edited · Like Christopher Strunk http://www.scribd.com/doc/112747771 /NOTICE-of-PETITION-INDEX-No-21948-2012-in-re-Complaintof-attempt-to-commit-a-crime-by-NY-Public-Officers-in-the2012-Electoral-College-and-to-VOID a few seconds ago · Like Write a comment... Facebook © 2012 · English (US) About · Create an Ad · Create a Page · Deve 2 of 2 11/14/2012 9:25 PM Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of OSC Exhibit 9 State of Arizona County of Maricopa ) ) ss. 1 AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned, being first duly sworn, do hereby state under oath and under penalty of perjury that the facts are true: 1. I am over the age of 18 and am a resident of Arizona. The information contained in this affidavit is based upon my own personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, could testify competently thereto. I am the duly elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, and I have been a law enforcement officer and official, in both state and federal government, for 5 1 years. 2. In August of last year, a group of citizens from the Surprise Arizona Tea Party organization met with me in my office and presented a petition signed by approximately 250 residents of Maricopa County, asking if I would investigate the controversy surrounding President Barrack Obama's birth certificate authenticity and his eligibility to serve as the President of the United States. 3. This group expressed its concern that, up until that point, no law enforcement agency in the country had ever gone on record indicating that they had either looked into this or that they were willing to do so, citing lack of resources and jurisdictional challenges. 4. The Maricopa County Sheriffs Office is in a rather unique position. Under the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes, as the elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, I have the authority to request the aid of the volunteer posse, located in the county, to assist me in the execution of my duties. Having organized a volunteer posse of approximately 3,000 members, I, as the Sheriff of the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, can authorize an investigation go forward to answer these questions at virtually no expense to the tax payer. 5. The Cold Case posse agreed to undertake the investigation requested by the 250 citizens of Maricopa County. This posse consists of former police officers and attorneys who have worked investigating the controversy surrounding Barack Obama. The investigation mainly focused on the electronic document that was presented as President Obama's long form birth certificate to the American people and to citizens of Maricopa County by the White House on April 27,201 1. 6. The investigation led to a closer examination of the procedures regarding the registration of births at the Hawaii Department of Health and various statements made by Hawaii government officials regarding the Obama birth controversy over the last five years. 7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama's longform birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number. 8. My investigators and I believe that President Obama's long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computer generated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website, may have been imported from another unknown source document. The effect of the stamp not being placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws means that there is probable cause that the document is a forgery, and therefore, it cannot be used as a verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Barack Obama's birth. 9. The Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into Barack Obarna's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president is on-going. The on-going nature of the investigation is due to additional information that has come to light since we held the press conference in March, 2012. As soon as that information has been properly verified by the Cold Case Posse, I will release that information to the public. Executed this Ld_ day of June, 20 1 Maricopa County, Arizona. Joseph M. Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff Sworn to and subsc ibed before me this \%?dayof $-lx\e ,2012. Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of OSC Exhibit 10 THIS DOCUMENT AND THIS PRESIDENT ARE NOT LEGITIMATE The important section of the Obama long form birth certificate is displayed below and enlarged to fit this page. We have found 24 proofs of forgery on this document so far and are showing 5 areas of our easiest to understand evidence here. We are 2 typographers with a combined experience of 70 years creating and examining our own documents along with expertise in scanning, graphic arts, photography, reproduction, printing, and also including the use of the old manual typewriters along with computer created documentation while starting and owning our own succesfull business' employing over 70 people. Alledgedly in 1961, a typewriter produced this document on a form, but the evidence shows us this birth certificate was created last year on a Macintosh computer, sending two copies of that form to the White House. The White house then posted a copy online and gave zerox copies to the media that the source for our exam. Concern's about the :sident's izenship have peaked between Sept. 15&17,2012, You.Gov ask 1000 Americans whether "Barack Obama was born in the US". The poll says 73 percent of Republicans and 40 percent overall either don't believe Obama was born in the U.S. or are not sure. For both Republicans and Americans, belief is that Obama is foreign-born. We have found this birth certificate to be a badly done forgery. I 1. Mismatched Typed Letters Compare these typewriten letters enlarged from the birth certificate. We have marked the ones chosen with a blue dot under the original letter. Of the 15 pairs chosen, one set is from the word "Student" that exhibits two different t v ~ stvles e , of the "t" within the same word. These support our contention that the typed letters were copied and assembled from different documents. Note the size , I 2.The Stolen --- differences. These letters couldnot come have from the same typewriter. aa ee EE 66 AA I1 nnSS - - - - % F g g & ~ ? ~ W W * ~ : ~ : ~ . ?, y f r ' y.-->.--. ~ .i, A . ,',. Birth Certificate Number of forgery. a > - If someone decided last year to forge a birth certificate for a person, they would need a birth certificate number that was issued in the 1961 era. A baby born the same day in Hawaii as Barack Obama ... died the next day. We believe that babies number was 61 10641. The family requested her birth certificate and got the short form with a number way out of sequence. They then requested the long form and were refused. They brought a lawsuit before the Hawaiian courts. It was denied, with the court explaining that the Honolulu Dept. of Health could decide if they wanted to provide the birth certificate of the deceased baby or not. But that is not the law in the state of Hawaii. ., .T :c-. 5 , OF . HAWAII %l+i3ERTIFIC,ATE .,..,: A*:.: r 2;. -I ,!,.,s ; ' * + . I LIVE BIRTH . ~, -A- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH v a ."',' ened & elarged to show the White Halo,i:;;ii. !z.sL:. pe or ~g,n&l .. . . , , . ':L. ' - ' , , ., I '. L ,2 A - .. ~ . . - . ~- ~ . . : 2 L ?A, . ~- FILE NUMBER 151 lc. Day 61 10641 L~et Name ; ..?!$iddle . . . ,v.,,;: "*&! BARAC~$~ ~~ k*q % , .; t ~iq$~~ . ., .. Ti . ~ . , ~@&,~~~$~?!,,l .-@ @ > : ;': { x ; i .,;'*, : " .; . w+, HUSSZIN .? OBAMA, I1 Year t : ! ~ $ ; e ,? . ,% : ; L i> i h %jj ; j ; ; ; ; , ; ; --. I.AW&.-, s t. . . - 36*sJ'hia ,. , .Birth -~~~ G $ @ Y L p : % h y % + ,. * rn Y4.v . 4 ; 4 , 1 h , . 2 *& ,,. .<...., -- I c.- i,~ ; ~-+ : . ;:~ 2 g l;gzA ~ I ~ g+t :~; ;~ ~ . + .p +,%p ." ~ -~ .? I.. ;.Ok ' .<~&b < . Single Twin U City, Top Rm.--l tce of Birth: a. ..u.aa V. Mj !a * = d u a( . . I~a-n:m- 7 L N I . o & a V I I 'j: I \ 4. If Twin or Triplet, Was Child Born - Birth TripletU ( let 2 n d d 3rd U Date < -"$J < , .;. - ..>. . . ; 58. Month Sb, Hour August &;SEE THE DIFFERENCES IN THE SPACE FROM ,THE WORD TO THE BASELINE OF THE FORM I I I LL "IJ' b h ~ County and State or Foreip G u n ty / 7, &.Kapiolani r - Maternity , ? * , 9 mme of Hospital or Institution (If trot in hoebital or institution, give etreet address) Gym ecolog?fial Hospital, J7b. Island % - 6d. Is Place of Birth Inside City or Town Lirnib? If no, give judicial dietrict yeam NO qua1 Residence of Mother: City, Town or Rural Lpcation 1 - . vJb-d . 9 y: 17c. 7e. z.IStreet . Address <,G> -- - i .L< 3 ,a?: ' e Y : .-5q A , -: ~ o n ~ ' . u $ u < ---- O . . c . -. .' - - Oat..~ Honolulu Is Reeidence Ineide City or Town Limits? ,give judicial district :efb 7g. Is Reddeuce on a Farm or Plantation? YCS NO@ i , , vi&pc: :.,, ,~2881~.::j 6085 Kala,l.anaoLe Highway '. ,I%, 7f. Mother's Mailing Address ,I, > . * . , . r L. - '-- i z : t & + OBATU ..': a , , , .,3.,~y .- 2 PICAS .. . : 8. lFull Name of Father: :. Age of Father .L . ,:. .. 9. Race of Father 10. BARACK 25 . . ' L a . . . Birthplace (Islarid, HCTSSEIN < Sore or Foreign k u n q y ) , Africa 12b. Kind of Businees or Industry 11. 12az Usual Occupation Kenya, East Africa. ANN, Birthplace (Island, State or Foreign Country)( Studen DlmlAM 17s. 13. Full Maiden Name of Mother 14. Race of Mother -iversity Caucasian STMJLEY 15. Age of Mother 16. - Type of Occupation Outside Home During Pregnancy l7b. I Date Lut Worked 4. Irregular Line Spacing 3.The Start of Line Error The word "Kapiolani" should be exactly under the word "Male", not a half space indented. This is proof of forgery. Also the fact that not all the lines are flush to the left is suspicious. No other birth certificate exhibits this peculiar style. This birth certificate form was designed for typewriters, SO that every time the typist pulled a carriage return, it would advance down exactly 2 picas to match the form line for line. This was commom for all forms made for typewriters. We were unable to find another birth certificate from Hawaii with uneven line spacing like this one. Typewriters do not do this. This is proof of forgery. 5. The W hite HaI0 The white halo, seen on the online White House release is a white outline around everthing on the birth certificate. NO other birth certificate has this. See it on Exhibit "A" below & Exhibit "B" showing how it should look. This was caused by the Adobe Photoshop filter used to sharpen edges. It does this by choking back the edge leaving a white halo. We show in Exhibit "C" how we did the same thing to our specimen example. The Hawaiian Dept. of Health is supposed to have put the original birth certificate on a copier and printed to a special green security paper instead of white paper. The only result possible from that is Exhibit "B", NOT exhibit "A". The halo proves that the forger combined a scan of the security paper on a computer ... flattened all of the elements in the file and then applied the Unsharp Mask. It is even on the birth certificate above ... see upper left corner. Since this is a direct copy of the birth certificate sent from Hawaii, that proves the white halo was on what they copied, so we must assume the Hawaiian original has it also. This is proof of forgery. Donald Trump's gift to the American people - was that - it forced Obama . . - to rush out a torgery . In a sane world Congress would hold hearings and nullify everythine he did in office. As an usurper Obama can't be impeached, but should be pressed for the crimes of forgery & treason. Obamats legitimacy is empty of integrity. Now Congress has a "Duty to investigate" . O r may Soon become an Accessory After the Fact to felony and high treason. 4 hibi bit hat A c Exhibit B with . t U ; + a r o Mask aoi - With purpose of evasion , Against the Constitution . This can not be ignored, All parties have a " Duty to Object " Lady Liberty and the American people have a right to know the Truth about Their President. Paul lrey & Douglas Vogt 2012 Congress failing to investigate this forgery is neglecting their constitutional "Duty to Object'! Paul Irey Statement on Indiana Ballot Challenge Trial http://obamaballotchallenge.com/paul-irey-statement-on-indiana-ballot-ch... Paul Irey Statement on Indiana Ballot Challenge Trial http://obamaballotchallenge.com/paul-irey-statement-on-indiana-ballot-ch... Videos Ballot News Blog FILING A COMPLAINT Search here I might add that the judge had experience using typewriters … as I understand from local people. This is very good for us as I am sure she understood my evidence that was mostly about the impossible typewriter errors on the Obama birth certificate. There was an audience … and many of them congratulated me after the testimony. One witness was with Army Intelligence and had good testimony also but was unable to testify as she was last just after me. At the conclusion of my testimony … judge Reid had to end the trial because of an appointment. This judge was fair and overruled countless objections from the two government attorneys representing Obama. In fact when I began to testify … they both got out of their seats and came over to stand about 5 feet away from me seeming concerned … as did Orly and Greg. Fortunately I had previously explained my testimony to Greg when we first met at a federal express office just before he drove Orly and I to the court building. Greg Black did an excellent job by the way … and was exactly what Orly needed to assist her in this very tough environment. There appeared to be about 20 to 25 audience members and there were actually 4 … not 2 witness’s who had attended to present their testimony and did so in my presence at the 3 hour mock trial we had … just off the main lobby of the University Plaza hotel the night before. My four 30Ǝ wide by 20Ǝ deep exhibits were entered into evidence and remained with the court. I am going to attach them here. I was not given enough time to present all of my evidence. The time was a problem because of the constant objections and long dissertations by the government lawyers which took one and a quater hours … so Judge Reid allowed the following hour for evidence to be presented … extending the trial 15 minutes until 12:15. It had started at 10 am. There was no easel available to put my exhibits on. At first I held the first two exhibits in my hand and after that … Orly held the other 4. All my testimony was a direct answer to Orly’s questions. The only significant questions from the government attorneys was if I knew the make and model typewriter used to type the birth certificate and did I have “personal” knowledge of the methods used in 1961 at the Health Dept. in Honolulu … to which I had to answer no. I made my testimony in a clear direct assertive manner … confident that I was correct and I think the judge was impressed. When the government attorneys objected that I was not an expert witness … the 65 year old lady judge answered that objection instead of Orly … “He said he had 57 years experience.” At the beginning when asked by Orly what my qualifications were … I had replied that I had … in the U.S. Air Force … from 1955 to 1958 … almost four years experience typing forms … two of which were at the National Security Agency for which I was given a Top Secret security clearance followed by 9 years after my discharge … being employed by Hearst Corp. and three advertising agencies before I formed my own company in 1968. Not testified to because of the time constrains … but I intended to mention … was that my company … Bergen Graphics Inc. was incorporated in the spring of 1968 and in its peak by the late 80ƍs … employed 60 people. Orly had forgotten to leave three of the exhibits with the judge. One was the blow-up of the important part of the Obama birth certificate that I had used to point out the line over line spacing irregularities and another page with the pic of my typewriter showing a bent “H” key … seen on the mismatched letters proof … a blow up of many “a”s typed on my own Olivetti – Underwood 5 … demonstrating how a typewriter was a precision instrument that typed letters always perfectly aligned vertically and horizontally and another pic showing how two keys could get stuck together and require being pulled apart manually causing the bent letters that have been proven in court in the past to positively identify any particular typewriter due to its unique assortment of bent letters. Also undelivered to the judge on that page … was a pic of my own Underwood 5 typewriter … and a pic of the same typewriter from the internet claiming that this was a “long-time standard of gov. agencies, newsrooms, and offices. Posted by By GeorgeM at 24 October, at 01 : 49 AM Print Like 5 Send 3 Paul was a trial witness and an early exposer of the Obama (long form) birth certificate forgery Via David LaRocque: I just returned to Florida last night from testifying at the trial against Obama’s elligibility as the presidential debate was going on in Boca Raton. You have reported the trial accurately. What was your source? 1 of 4 11/14/2012 9:10 PM 2 of 4 11/14/2012 9:10 PM Paul Irey Statement on Indiana Ballot Challenge Trial http://obamaballotchallenge.com/paul-irey-statement-on-indiana-ballot-ch... Paul Irey Statement on Indiana Ballot Challenge Trial http://obamaballotchallenge.com/paul-irey-statement-on-indiana-ballot-ch... Most of my testimony was similar to the newspaper page we had published in the Washington Times a week before … and Orly should have entered that in evidence also but forgot … but I don’t blame her as she had her hands full responding to what seemed to me to be the overbearing best lawyers the government could provide. The “Baseline Errors” evidence is new and not in the Wash. Times page because I had just discovered it this past Sat. before I flew to Indianapolis. What I did first was type a test of the particular way the old manual typewriters shifted from lower case to caps. The entire mechanism holding the keys moves down when the shift key is held down … causing the cap letter to strike in place of the lower case letter because both characters are on the same key. It was considered a great innovation when this method was first employed on a typewriter because it allowed for cheaper manufacturing. However if the typist did not press the shift key completely down before the letter was struck … the result would be a cap typed letter a bit higher than the baseline of the word. Also less common would be when a letter was typed before the shift key was fully released that would cause the following lower case letter to be lower than the baseline. Once I had established that rule … I decided to check the baselines of everything on the certificate to see if any cap letter was below the baseline of a word and if any lower case letter was above the baseline of a word … which was impossible. I found 4 lower-case letters … marked with red arrows … that were above the baselines of the word they were included in … and this all by itself proved forgery because that is absolutely impossible for any manual typewriter since the mechanism does not allow that. I found no caps that were lower than the baseline. Then along in addition that evidence … I found seven of the nine lines on the Obama birth certificate had words that were on the same line … but contained whole words or parts of words that did not align with the rest. Also impossible for a typewriter unless the typist were to release the roller and adjust the position up or down manually … and why would any typist do that for no good reason in the middle of typing a single line on a form? This proves forgery in two individual ways and shows us that no typewriter did it … but that it most likely was all a result of the letter being positioned by eye … probably on a computer monitor using Adobe Photoshop. This was new evidence no one had found before … and I was elated that I had discovered another separate proof of my contention that it was a computer created document. The last three documents attached here are the two mistakenly not given to the judge. Except for a completely controlled major media … I could absolutely prove this to the American voter right now with my testimony and my cards … a pointer … and camera zooms. And remember that this evidence was accepted in a Superior court in the state of Indiana … from me as a person now recognized as an expert witness … for the purpose of not allowing Obama votes to be counted because he has not proven his citizenship. I have a bad feeling that if judge Reid rules in favor of Orly … the media will not report it … as they have not reported this important trial … and also not reporting that Obama was served a subpoena to produce his original birth certificate and come to Indiana to answer these serious charges of forgery … a contention if true … also amounts to treason. And if for some technical reason the Judge declines to rule against Obama … then the media WILL fully report it with the expected usual headline: PROOF OBAMA BORN IN HAWAII … JUDGE THROWS OUT CASE! A Headline I found on FOX NEWS in 2008 when a judge ruled against a plaintiff because of his not having “STANDING” … meaning that Obama had not harmed him personally. So FOX lied … giving the impression that the judge had heard evidence but he actually had not … and I would know the word “standing” should have been mentioned as part of that story. Paul Irey More on Indiana Post to Facebook Post to dd k d News, Uncategorized Ballot News Blog, iIndiana Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE 3 of 4 11/14/2012 9:10 PM 4 of 4 11/14/2012 9:10 PM Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of OSC Exhibit 11 Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s... Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s... Videos Ballot News Blog FILING A COMPLAINT Search here Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 6 November, at 07 : 19 AM Print Loopholes and Ensuing Conspiracy. I have had many years of experience working with the security clearance process as an officer in the Army. One of my job positions was as the battalion intelligence staff officer where I was in charge of security clearances and physical security for a unit of 400 people. I became unnerved at all of the suspect relationships of Obama in the 2008 campaign. When Obama was sworn in, I knew that there could not be a security check requirement because Obama wouldn’t pass. I began my research into the presidential vetting process only to find that there are no requirements of even vetting the minimum qualifications to become President, only a couple times where vetting is optional: with Congress when certifying the election results and with the states as a matter of ballot access. No federal agency is required to check into a Presidential candidate or President Elects’ background. This CIA page snap shot, clearly states that President, Senator and Representatives do not have to qualify for a security clearance. They are just given one because they were elected… Unfortunately for the security of the U.S. voters are not privy to a candidates’ critical background information so they cannot fully evaluate a candidate’s trustworthiness . From the Central Intelligence Agency’s report How Intelligence-Sharing Works at Present (2007); https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs /sharing-secrets-with-lawmakers-congress-as-a-user-of-intelligence/3.htm Barack Obama Did Not Have to Undergo Any Background Checks to Become President or Gain Access To Top Secret Information Because It was Not Required Adjudication of Publicly Available Information Proves Obama Would Never Be Granted A Security Clearance If He Had To Qualify For One By CPT Pamela Barnett, U.S. Army Retired (Use of rank does not imply endorsement or approval of the Department of Defense or U.S. Army) Obama never had to prove his ability to legally work in the United States or had to submit to a security clearance background investigation…. Ever!!! Shockingly the reason is that it is not required. This statement is proven in the recently released book Obama Never Vetted: The Unlawful President, The National Security From the CIA website link above – In General All Members of Congress have access to intelligence by virtue of their elected positions. They do not receive security clearances per se. The Office of Personnel Management for the federal government also states that the federal government does not do a background check into Presidents, yet they do a background check for everyone else working in the White House. See OPM letter below. 1 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM 2 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s... Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s... Because Obama’s background was not vetted by any federal agency, I adjudicated his background using publicly available information and the federal guidelines for adjudicating an applicant for access to classified information. My conclusion is that Obama would be denied a clearance if he had to qualify for one. Here’s the Obama Adjudication report from Obama Never Vetted: The Unlawful President…. Obama Security Clearance Adjudication Preliminary Analysis Begins Here Obama did not contribute to this analysis. Information was obtained from sources linked within analysis. (Appendix Contains Federal Forms that All other Federal Employees Except The Constitutionally Elected Employees Have to Complete at End of Chapter) (1) Guideline A: Allegiance to the United States Concern 1 – Obama born with British/Kenyan Allegiance through legal father Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. Concern 2 – Obama became Indonesian and developed Indonesian allegiance through adopted father while living overseas in Indonesia. (according to Indonesian School records from AP.) Concern 3 – No proof that Obama has renounced citizenship to either country. (President of the U.S. only position that requires sole allegiance to the United States (ie: Natural Born Citizen requirement in Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5) Concern 4 – Obama supports actions of Islamic caliphate in Arab world instead of promoting secular democracies run by the people of the country in an effort to continue Middle Eastern allies. Obama was raised in the Islamic religion and shows a preference to Islamic rule in the middle east which compromises the security of the United States. Obama’s adviser Dalia Mogahed is a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer. It is the express goal of the Muslim Brotherhood to bring the entire world under Islamic government and Sharia law – including the United States. Muslim Brotherhood and Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL6JK55ql1E Obama’s Pro Muslim Brotherhood Advisor Dalia Mogahed: http://frontpagemag.com/2010/nonie-darwish /appeasing-the-muslim-brotherhood/ Obama gives billions of tax payer money to Muslim Brotherhood to Buy Weapons: http://www.youtube.com /watch?v=l2S1mJAxMzA Obama spends $770 million to help foreign mosques http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHwPrXsw0Ag& playnext=1&list=PLCCEBB0C000B35B07&feature=results_main Concern 5 - Regarding 4(C )(1)(2)(4) Long- time friend of Bill Ayers, Member of the Weather Underground, which wanted to overthrow the United States, The Weather Underground was responsible for multiple murders and bombings of federal government buildings. Ayers has been quoted as saying he wishes he could have done more. Recently an affidavit was signed by the mailman for the Bill Ayer’s family house which stated that the Ayers family paid for Obama’s college and said that Obama was a foreign student. So Obama has been closely associated with Bill Ayers for about 30 years. He wasn’t just a man in the neighborhood as Obama has repeatedly espoused to the electorate of the U.S.: http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/postman-ayers-familyput-foreigner-obama-through-school/#ooid=E0ZGg2NDqsd2ZwNHinIhhgXegZkT00X1 Concern 6 – Obama associates William Ayers Bernadine Dohrn, Tom Hayden and Carl Davidson were involved in espionage against the United States on behalf of communist Cuba according to FBI files. http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5860 http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2322 From DiscoverTheNetworksCarl Davidson and Tom Hayden take credit for having launched in 1969 the “Venceremos Brigades,” which covertly transported hundreds of young Americans to Cuba to help harvest sugar cane and interact with Havana’s communist revolutionary leadership. (The Brigades were organized by Fidel Castro’s Cuban intelligence agency, which trained “brigadistas” in guerrilla warfare techniques including the use of arms and explosives.) from Canada Free Press storyUnrepentant terrorist former leading Weather Underground Organization (WUO) member William Ayers was aided by Fidel Castro’s Cuba in the 1970s, according to a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) report. The 400-page report, a copy of which was obtained by the New York Times, revealed that Cuban intelligence officers in the General Directorate of Intelligence (known by its initials in Spanish as the DGI, Cuba’s equivalent of the CIA) set up the Venceremos Brigades in which WUO members participated. “The ultimate objective of the DGI’s participation in the setting up of the Venceremos Brigades was “the recruitment of individuals who are politically oriented and who someday may obtain a position, elective or appointive, somewhere in the U.S. Government, which would provide the Cuban Government with access to political, economic and military intelligence.”(Italics CFP’s). bold underlines by author. Obama is linked to Ayers by working with him directly in multiple progressive foundations and Obama is linked to Carl Davidson from his involvement in The New Party in Illinois. Obama is closely linked with Tom Hayden ( http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/05/14/obamas-connections-to-the-violent-sds-tom-hayden/) who also has an FBI file for his subversive activities against the United States. Hayden has a 22,000 page FBI file. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/books/review/subversives-by-seth-rosenfeld.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 In the mid-1990s Davidson was a major player in the Chicago branch of the New Party, a socialist political coalition whose members hailed largely from the Committees of Correspondence, the Democratic Socialists of America, and ACORN. Davidson first met Barack Obama through the New Party, which endorsed Obama’s campaign for the Illinois state senate in 1996. Concern 7 – Regarding 4(a)Raised money and campaigned for Ralia Odinga who sought to be elected in Kenya, a fellow member of the Luo Tribe member. Odinga is an avowed communist and signed an agreement with a Muslim group in his country to not assist America and other nations with the apprehension and extradition of terrorists while under the counsel of Obama. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnfsF-9h4LI&feature=channel&list=UL 4 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM 3 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s... Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tHUbtrpFeU&list=UUY8sdsGPYCgy8XrVT-mPX4g&index=7& feature=plcp Obama’s actions could be strongly construed to be a payoff for possibly hiding or destroying something in Kenya- like a birth certificate perhaps. Note: Why else would Obama be travelling to another continent and advising him unless he was getting something in return? Concern 6 – Regarding section 4(a), Obama in his own autobiography admits that he was mentored by Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis who was working directly for the Soviet Union to overthrow the Republican system of government. Frank Marshall Davis has a large FBI surveillance file and would have been arrested for espionage if the U.S. went to open war with the Soviet Union. The following are some links that contain parts of the FBI file on Sources: Autobiography, http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/hawaii-obama.pdf, http://www.usasurvival.org /marshall.fbi.files.html Concern 7 – Obama wants a new system of government fascism instead of the freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution, the Constitution which is his job to defend and uphold. http://www.youtube.com /watch?v=ge3aGJfDSg4&feature=player_embedded Mitigating Factors – None. No mitigation has been done by Obama, in fact he has spent $10 million in U.S. tax payer dollars to pass a new Kenyan Constitution to instill Muslim Sharia law and legalize abortions in Kenya. He continues relationships and courses of action which are of great concern. (http://www.youtube.com /watch?v=RlboSRT5kYo&feature=player_embedded#!) (2) Guideline B: Foreign Influence Kenya Concern 1 – Obama states he was born in Kenya until 2007 while stating also he was born in Hawaii. Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeYUwlLrl3w Concern 2 – Regarding section 7(a)(b), Obama took U.S. tax payer money to help write and pass a pro-Sharia, pro-abortion Constitution that would also allow him to become President in Kenya. Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlboSRT5kYo Concern 3 -Obama is influenced by his Kenyan fellow citizens. He also has substantial profit from foreign companies in his 2011 tax return. Members of the Kenyan government have stated on the record that Obama was born in Kenya, found it amazing that a non-native of America could become President of the United States. Sources; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_8PC3oKAvA Concern 4 – Regarding section 7(a)(b), Obama has very close ties to Ralia Odinga who promoted violence when he lost his election and signed agreement to not cooperate with the U.S. regarding terrorism. Obama acts as if he owes something personally to Ralia Odinga by raising $1 million dollars and campaigning for him even though it is against the Logan Act. Indonesia A retired postal worked signed affidavit that Obama was a Indonesian student in college. Question – Obama hides his college records most likely to hide his Indonesian citizenship as an adult and/or hide who paid for his college? This must be further investigated and all college records examined. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwoNpP35pXI http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_162767&feature=iv&src_vid=IwoNpP35pXI& v=ql20v23KnIY? Obama allowed by Executive Order billionaire James Riyadi a fellow Indonesian convicted of breaking U.S. campaign finance laws by funneling millions of dollars illegally to President Bill Clinton to enter the country after Congress had banned him from entry. Regarding 7(i), a trip to Pakistan with a Pakistani national at time when Pakistan was at war with the Soviet Union in 1981. Mitigating Conditions: None. None of these relationships could be construed as casual or unsubstantial because large amounts of money were raised on Obama’s behalf to help Odinga, funneled millions of dollars to Kenya, and special treatment for a criminally convicted billionaire who owns the largest coal mining business in Indonesia by signing an Executive Order to allow him in the country. Regarding the Pakistan trip, Obama would have to have been interviewed to know length of stay, all foreign contacts and what he was doing there at a time of turmoil. Some questions – Why would Obama not instead be campaigning to raise money for himself instead of Odinga? What possible benefit would Odinga be to Obama? Could it be the purported missing birth record of Obama in Kenya (by Kenyan government)? Why is Obama allowing a convicted felon banned by Congress to enter the U.S. to come right in? Is it his special feeling of allegiance to Indonesia? Why have Kenyan official stated in their legislative sessions that Obama was born in Kenya? (3) Guideline C: Foreign Preference 9. The Concern. When an individual acts in such a way as to indicate a preference for a foreign country over the United States… Regarding section 10(a)(1), Possession of a current foreign passport. The following link has excellent additional information on dual citizenship and foreign passports. http://www.clearancejobs.com/clearednews/91/dual-citizenship-and-security-clearances Obama’s passport records were compromised by an employee of his now head of Terrorism John Brennan. The Office of Inspector General did a lengthy report on the breach but only released about half of the report to the public. Then Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice said that she could not guarantee that anything was added to or taken from the passport databases regarding Obama’s file. The Pakistani equivalent to the U.S. Civil Service exam had Obama being born in Kenya, this could be because Obama may have used a Kenyan passport when he traveled to Pakistan. Obama was also taken off his mother’s (Stanley Ann Dunham) passport as a child while living in Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen according to Indonesian grade school records obtained from the Associated Press. Regarding section 10(5), using Foreign citizenship to protect financial or business interests in another country – Obama has never produced any school records (AP News produced Indonesian grade school record) Occidental has said that Obama had been on scholarship there. Normally that would mean decent grades, but Obama has hidden his records for Occidental, Columbia and Harvard. Khalid al Mansour, a radical Muslim who is anti-Christian and anti-Jew, and an agent for a Saudi Prince who owns a large percentage of Fox News (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIVO8MZYXo8) raised money for and helped Obama to get into Harvard. Mitigating Conditions – None, Obama continues to hide his college and middle and high school records. All of these school records need to be examined. President of the United States is to have no other citizenships to best try to ensure sole allegiance to the United States. (4) Guideline D: Sexual Behavior 13. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying: Obama has been accused of being a “member” of the Down Low Club and of having sexual relationships with men by Larry Sinclair in his book , the mother of a murdered gay man Donald Young, a fellow Trinity Church member, and now others from Trinity church in Chicago. There is more than once accusation from more than 3 people. Whether or not Obama is gay, he could be subject to coercion, exploitation or duress which could be a disqualifying condition of its own. http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/another-boost-for-obamas-gay-accuser/ http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/jesse-jackson-wright-arranged-obama-marriage/ http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/trinity-church-members-reveal-obama-shocker/ Mitigating Conditions – Further investigation would need to be done of the people making the accusations and of Obama. (5) Guideline E: Personal Conduct Regarding Section 16(d)(3), Obama lied on his Attorney application for the state of Illinois. He stated under penalty of perjury that he had not been known by any other names when he was known by at least 4 other 5 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM 6 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s... Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background ... http://obamaballotchallenge.com/unvetted-obama-never-had-to-undergo-s... names: Soebarkah, Barry Soetoro, Barack Hussein Obama II and Junior. Obama is a serial liar, which shows he cannot be trusted. Here are only some of the many lies told by Obama.: http://obamalies.net/list-of-lies Regarding Section (g), Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, Tony Rezko, Frank Marshall Davis, Khalid al Mansour, and Ralia Odinga are/were associates of Obama. All are either criminals or have advocated for the overthrow of the U.S. government. Mitigating Conditions: None. Behaviors continue. (6) Guidline F: Financial Considerations 18. The Concern. Affluence that cannot be explained by known sources of income is also a security concern. It may indicate proceeds from financially profitable criminal acts. (h)unexplained affluence , as shown by lifestyle or standard of living , increase of net worth , or money transfers that cannot be explained by subject’s known legal sources of income. Convicted felon Tony Rezko who was a fundraiser for Obama, had secured a property and home purchase for the Obama’s far below the market value. Rezko’s attorney is listed as the owner of the property. This is very indicative of bribery, tax fraud and Senate ethics violations. (http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2008/12 /obamas-house-is-owned-by-rezkos-lawyer.html) The financing of Obama’s education would also need to be further investigated to determine the nature of the deal between Al Mansour and Saudi Arabian citizens. Mitigating Conditions: None (7) Guideline G: Alcohol Consumption Not rated/Unknown By Adjudicator (8) Guideline H: Drug Involvement Obama has admitted to using several illegal drugs in his books and another allegation of his using drugs was made by Larry Sinclair (See also Guideline G: Sexual Behavior for more on Sinclair).: http://www.amazon.com /Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair-Cocaine/dp/0578013878 Mitigating Conditions: Further investigation required and polygraph test. (9) Guideline I: Psychological Conditions Not rated, but recommend mental evaluation due to serial lying. (10) Guideline J: Criminal Conduct Regarding section 31(c), allegation or admission of criminal conduct, regardless of whether the person was formally charged, formally prosecuted or convicted. Forged BC, Selective Service Registration(Draft Card), and Use Of Not Assigned SSN A background check of publicly released “documents” by Obama reveal non-authentic, altered otherwise forged documents. Forged birth certificate and Selective Service Forgery – see Hawaii Chapter in Sheriff Arpaio’s report. A background check of Obama’s Social Security Numbers and addresses would have revealed extremely likely criminal behavior that should be turned over to a special prosecutor as the DOJ has proven to be a political animal not concerned with the rule of law and not trustworthy in matters of national security. Mitigating Condition: None. Crime is ongoing as Obama continues to use a SSN not assigned to him, a Selective Service Registration made fraudulently after the deadline, and continues to have a birth certificate forgery posted at whitehouse.gov. A full inestigation would have to be done to sort out all of the signs of criminal fraud encompassing Obama. (11) Guideline K: Handling Protected Information Obama’s White House has leaked a vast amount of information that endangers the U.S. and our allies according to Congresmen and Senator Diane Feinstein.: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VPd0YpN8E8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNh9O_2fyp8 Mitigating Conditions: None as Obama has not taken responsibility or taken action to stop leaks. (12) Guideline L: Outside Activities Not rated by Adjudicator because other criteria regarding applicant more than enough to deny clearance to applicant Obama. (13) Guideline M: Use of Information Technology Systems 7 of 8 11/16/2012 7:36 PM 8 of 8 Concern 1 -Obama used the federal government website whitehouse.gov to post a forged birth certificate document Concern 2 – Has used federal government computers to spy on Americans that do not agree with his policies with flag@whitehouse.gov These actions prove that Obama has no respect for rules and regulations regarding government computer access; cannot use computers for personal use or to commit a crime. Mitigating Conditions: None. Birth certificate forgery remains at www.whitehouse.gov CONCLUSION Security clearance denied to applicant Barack Obama for massive complex unresolved issues that present a great potential threat to national security. Forwarding file to special prosecutor for investigation of criminal activity. ************************************************End of Report*********************************************** Author: Pamela Barnett’s book Obama Never Vetted: The Unlawful President, The National Security Loopholes and Ensuing Conspiracy That Endanger America is available at Amazon.com. Ballot News Blog background check, birth certificate, forged, forgery, never vetted, obama, security clearance Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE 11/16/2012 7:36 PM Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s AFFIDAVIT in support of OSC Exhibit 12 Thursday, 8 November 201270th Anniversary OPERATION TORCH - World War II Northwest Africa - Casablanca From: Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III United States Navy Retired To: • Robert Swan Mueller, III, Director - Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington D.C. (ORIGINAL) The Foreman of the two sitting Federal Grand Juries sitting in Knoxville, Tennessee via William C. Killian, U.S. Attorney for Tennessee's Easter District died. 5 men of a Navy support force died. OBAMA and his gang of outlaws lie to the America people about that. 6. In commission of TREASON OBAMA is engaged in purchasing and supplying guns, heavy weapons, high-powered munitions and explosives to foreign aggressors-AMERICA'S ENEMIES-around the globe. OBAMA has and continues to ship weapons from Libya to Syria through Turkey. Some weapons may be being directly shipped to Syria. Christopher Stevens was OBAMA's point man of this operation when Stevens was murdered in Benghazi during the attack of 11-12 September 2012. In this TREASON OBAMA is arming America's enemies: Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood connected Syrian rebels. 7. As an Act of TREASON OBAMA provides safe-haven and sanctuary to those bent on the destruction of the United States, its people, and its form of government. OBAMA encourages, facilitates and arms our enemies to carry out a WAR on the United States from enemy bases set up in the homeland and around the globe. OBAMA aids and abets these known enemy forces to establish and strike from strongholds OBAMA allows established on American soil. 8. OBAMA refuses to pledge his allegiance to the United States. OBAMA conspires with leaders of countries, groups and organizations bent upon the destruction of America. By so doing OBAMA engages in TREASON against the United States in every aspect of TREASON. 9. As an Act of TREASON OBAMA broke into and occupies the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling and deceit. OBAMA is an undocumented illegal alien and spy. Posing as an imposter president and commander-in-chief OBAMA strips civilian command and control over the military establishment. Known military criminal actorscommand racketeers such as Martin Dempsey-are free in the exercise of an extra-military government intent upon the destruction of our Republican, constitutional form of governance. There are dozens of senior military commanders no more obedient to the United States Constitution than is OBAMA. 10. OBAMA is joined in his TREASON by a raft of civilian criminal assistants too numerous to name in this submission. I leave it to the Grand Jury, in the conduct of an independent, autonomous, and unfettered investigation, to assign specificity and particularity to the list of OBAMA'S co-conspiring outlaws. 11. OBAMA is a FOREIGN BORN DOMESTIC ENEMY, an infiltrator, a • SUBJECT: FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS NAMING BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMAIN COMMISSION OF TREASON! 1. OBAMA represents a clear and present danger to U.S. national security, to the U.S. Constitution and to our Republican form of government. OBAMA IS A FOREIGN BORN DOMESTIC ENEMY! OBAMA is working assiduously to destroy America! No document record exists showing Barack Hussein OBAMA to be a United States citizen. 2. OBAMA paid money and aided and abetted Al-Qaeda members and groups that attacked Americans on U.S. territory in Benghazi, Libya on 11 and 12 September 2012. Al-Qaeda is the jihadist terrorist organization that attacked the United States on 11 September 2001. 3. Pro-jihadist and Islamist OBAMA personally denied frantic cries for help from Americans in mortal danger throughout a 7-hour attack by approximately 150 heavily armed known jihadists. OBAMA watched four Americans die in real time. OBAMA is allowing our enemies to slaughter our servicemen piecemeal at the same time ordering our troops to disarm. 4. OBAMA lies to the American people about his TREASON with every opportunity. OBAMA is lying to the American people about the 11-12 September attack in Benghazi, Libya in a cover story intended to protect OBAMA from facing a criminal prosecution and conviction. 5. OBAMA is personally responsible for the 6 August 2011 shoot-down of an Army CH-47D Chinook helicopter in Afghanistan. 17 Navy SEALS died. All 5 men of the Chinook crew died. 3 Air Force special tactics airmen 2 -----~---------- ~----------- - -- ------ traitor and a spy. OBAMA installed and operates a government that rivals and competes with our U.S. Constitution. OBAMA operates government not found in our United States Constitution. If not arrested OBAMA will continue to commit TREASON. OBAMA is emboldened now and more dangerous to this country's survival as a constitutional Republic than any other threat the United States faces in the world. 12. We come now to this reckoning: I accuse Barack Hussein OBAMA of TREASON. I accuse OBAMA'S military-political criminal assistants of TREASO N. Their criminal mischief is recognized as TREASON in pure form. I expose and identify OBAMA and his criminal associates as TRAITORS (Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Leon Panetta, Susan Rice, David Petraeus and Martin Dempsey but a few). 13. It needs be said out loud and relentlessly: OBAMA is aiding and abetting America's enemies. OBAMA is lying to the American people in every regard going to OBAMA'S TREASONOUNS escapades. OBAMA IS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! 14. This submission renews and extends all previous filings naming OBAMA in commission of TREASON dating from 17 March 2009. The list of ACTS of OBAMA'S TREASON found in this formal criminal complaint is not exhaustive. Far from it. 15. My sworn duty is to stand against everything OBAMA stands for. The FOREIGN BORN DOMESTIC ENEMY OBAMA IS NOT MY PRESIDENT! HE IS NOT MY COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF! Obedient to my oath to the United States Constitution in submission of this criminal complaint for TREASON I remain stead fast and, BORN FIGHTING, ~1!:!~:lf!~'~~ [}// United States Navy Retired Distribution wide Sworn and issued before me this 8th day of November 2012 "This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is perhaps, the end of the beginning." at /(/X/J3 hours local ( 14: ¢>Ja.m. EST) 3 4 . Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk’s MEMORANDUM in support of OSC Exhibit 13 Private Report to Elias Aoun - Yahoo! Mail Page 1 of 1 Private Report to Elias Aoun From: "Eric Phelps" To: "Christopher Strunk" 1 File (747KB) Sunday, August 15, 2010 9:34 PM Private R... Here it is. If you need it in PDF let me know. http://us.mc576.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=21&filt... 8/16/2010 Private Report to Elias Aoun Attempted Answers to Specific Questions And the Fate of Lebanon as per the Design of the Society of Jesus Warning: The conclusions of this report are private and the personal property of Elias Aoun. No part of this report will be released by the author to any third party without a specific directive from Elias Aoun. Before commencing the body of this text, the author recommends the reading of his book, Vatican Assassins: “Wounded In The House Of My Friends.” Therein, the reader will be informed, fact-by-fact, as to the origin and perfection of the Jesuit Superior General’s International Intelligence Community. That Community is overseen by the pope’s Sovereign Military Order of Malta headquartered in Rome and directed by its Grand Master, Andrew Bertie. Thus, the Jesuit General, also known as “the Black Pope,” controls the entirety of the American Intelligence Community, including but not limited to, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Office of Naval Intelligence as well as the intelligence arms of the Army and the Air Force. An accurate understanding of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 overseen by Knight of Malta Francis Cardinal Spellman further confirms the reality of a unified American Intelligence Community, which is the foundation for the pope’s International Intelligence Community, including Nazi-founded INTERPOL and Soviet KGB/FSB. This Unified International Intelligence Community was built during Rome’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945) and perfected during Rome’s subsequent Cold War (1945-1990). A brief chronology will be now provided as a summary of events of the Twentieth Century as covered in detail in Vatican Assassins: “Wounded In The House Of My Friends,” third edition, enclosed herein as a gift to Elias Aoun. 1 1. During the Black Pope’s World War I, called “The Great War,” the Protestant German Empire (the Second Reich) was destroyed. On its ruins, the Roman Catholic German Third Reich would be erected, fully prepared to fulfill the Order’s Council of Trent in killing accursed “heretics and liberals” throughout Europe and Jesuit-ruled Russia (alias, “U.S.S.R.”), the Order having been formally readmitted into Russia by Lenin after its legal expulsion by Tzar Alexander I in 1820. During this time Jesuit Nazi fascism, overseen by a separate Jesuit entity called the SS, would be united with Islam in that calculated destruction. It was for this reason that Hitler and Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Haj Amin al-Husseini worked together from 1941 to 1945 while based in the once Protestant, then apostate, Masonically-ruled city of Berlin. The collusion between Jesuit Nazi Fascism, Jesuit Soviet Communism, Islam and Labor Zionism is undeniable, all four factions being ruled by the Black Pope via high-level, illuminized Freemasonry and financed by the Knights of Malta directing the pope’s International Banking Cartel based in the Old City of London and New York City. Therefore, we should not be surprised to see the pope’s Lebanese Intelligence Service (overseen by the Jesuit Provincial in Beirut) secretly working with Islamic intelligence commanders of several factions, including Saudi Arabia, for the ultimate destruction of both papal and non-papal Christians in Lebanon. As the majority of Bible-reading Christians have been purged from Iraq under the guise of the Order’s “War on Terror,” even so will it be in Lebanon. 2. During the Black Pope’s World War I, the Masonically-ruled, Islamic Ottoman Empire would be defeated and dismembered after Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors Sultan Abdul Hamid II and Kaiser Wilhelm II (who had fired anti-Jesuit, Masonic Prince Bismarck) carried out the pope’s Armenian Genocide, murdering nearly two million non-papal Christians via the Grand Orient Lodge’s Masonic “Young Turks.” The tool of the Society of Jesus to bring this massacre to pass was its Masonically-directed, apostate Protestant 2 British Empire (ruled by Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and Knight of Malta King George V), which Empire had also been slated for ultimate destruction. Jerusalem would now be taken from the Moslems, or rather given away by the Order’s Masonic Sultan in 1917 (the Sultan’s “defenders” of Jerusalem surrendering the city to Masonic British General Allenby without firing a shot!), to be under the military power of Britain until Israel’s War of Independence (conveniently aided through a military “mistake” by Haj Amin al-Husseini, Masonic commander of Palestine’s Arab Moslems) in 1948. According to James A. Wylie’s The History of Protestantism, Volume II, Book 15, page 386, Loyola’s first quest was to take Jerusalem from the Moslems: “The war in which Loyola and his nine companions enrolled themselves, when on the 15th of August, 1534, they made their vow in the Church of Montmartre, was to be waged against the Saracens of the East.” [Emphasis added] Clearly, Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus, fully intended to reclaim Jerusalem for the pope as did every Crusade during the Dark Ages, save the First Crusade. In fact, the two cities preeminent in the mind of every Jesuit professed of the Fourth Vow are Jerusalem and Babylon. Rome is merely the base of operations until the Order can move its commercial capital from London to a rebuilt Babylon (Revelation 18), and its religious capital from Rome (Revelation 17) to Jerusalem (II Thessalonians 2:3-4) hosting a rebuilt Hebrew Temple in its midst (Daniel 9:27; Matthew 24:15). At the time of World War I, both cities were within the jurisdiction of Islam’s Ottoman Empire. Therefore, it had to be broken up if Solomon’s Hebrew Temple and Babylon were to be rebuilt. The 33rd Degree Freemason and Royal Institute of International Affairs member, which the Black Pope used to divide up the Ottoman Empire, was the arch conspirator in the deliberate sinking of the Lusitania (1915) and the murder of 100,000 White Protestant British soldiers at Gallipoli (1915), Winston Churchill. 3 After the infamous Treaty of Versailles concluded in 1919, the nations of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Turkey, and Palestine (Israel) were created out of the former Ottoman Empire. The Jesuits, via their high Freemasons directing the Versailles conference in Paris, carefully laid the foundations for the future creation of these new nations. Britain would rule Iraq (Babylon), Jordan and Palestine/Israel (Jerusalem). France would rule Lebanon (Beirut) and Syria (Damascus). Thus, we see that the Black Pope used the British Empire (his creature since the tyrannical reign of King George III) to oversee the world’s two most important cities in the eyes of the Order: Jerusalem and Babylon. The building of Jerusalem would commence; but the building of Babylon would have to wait until after this present, American-led Crusade and war of Moslem/Shiite annihilation in Iraq and Iran. Then Babylon could be rebuilt with its precursor in Dubai. Apparently, the Masonic Sunni and Wahhabi leaders subject to Rome (including the Black Pope’s Masonic House of Saud) have united for the destruction of the Shiites (formerly, the greatest Moslem enemies of the Jesuits, their past leaders having expelled the Order from Iraq in 1969), while Shiite leaders of today aid in that murder, betraying their own people into the hands of American crusaders, including the pope’s Knight of Malta-owned, “turkey-shooting,” U.S.-based, Blackwater Group mercenaries. The French Mandate issued at Versailles, based upon the pre-arranged Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916), enabled France to begin occupying Lebanon and Syria. Lebanon became a republic in 1926 and achieved independence in 1943, during World War II. Its first president was a “heretic” Greek Orthodox lawyer and former journalist, Charles Dabbas. He in turn governed the republic that was filled with “accursed heretics,” including nonRoman Catholic Christians slated for “extirpation” pursuant to the Black Pope’s Counter Reformation Council of Trent. They included Maronites and Greek Orthodox; their future murderers would be Sunni and Shiite Moslems 4 acting as the “Sword of the Church.” For that murder to transpire, the French would have to go, as they had been the protectors of all “Christians” within the Ottoman Empire. Since 1943 Lebanon has been an independent republic secretly ruled by the Jesuit Order from their military fortress, St. Joseph’s University in Beirut. The Jesuit Provincial for the Order’s Near East Vice-Province resides in Beirut and is pictured below; the province is composed of Egypt, Lebanon and Syria. Thus, Beirut is the heart of all Jesuit military activity within the nation and region. http://www.companysj.com/v143/meetingpix.html Fr. Jan Bronsveld, 2007 Jesuit Provincial for the Near East Vice-Province Local Master of Hezbollah and Government of Lebanon Secret Master of Lebanon’s Intelligence Services 5 The most important Jesuit of all, the Provincial for the Near East ViceProvince for eighteen years, was none other than today’s Jesuit General: Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, 1990s Jesuit Superior General, 1983-Present Provincial, Near East Vice-Province, 1974-1981 Incited Lebanese Civil War in 1975 Ordered to Rome by Jesuit Superior General Pedro Arrupe, 1981 http://www.30giorni.it/us/articolo.asp?id=554 We now shall be able to understand the mass-murder of Lebanon’s resident, non-papal Christians at the hands of Rome’s Moslem “warriors for the Church.” This will ultimately bring us to the Black Pope’s creation and temporary backing of Shiite Hezbollah as well as the Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists (ruling the pope’s revived “Kingdom of Jerusalem”—Israel) and 6 thus the Mossad and military commanders of the Israeli Defense Forces. Between these two military powers were the “heretic and liberal,” nonRoman Catholic Christians who were being annihilated in the most recent Israeli-Hezbollah War (2006). Tortured and murdered by Shiite Hezbollah and bombed by the Israeli Defense Forces, the Christians of Southern Lebanon were just more victims of Jesuit military maneuvers, the Black Pope directing both sides of every conflict and thus the resultant diplomatic resolutions. (We see this scenario repeated in Israel over and over again.) The “extirpation” was merely the Council of Trent enforced once again amidst the confusion of Shiite Hezbollah’s rocket attacks into Israel killing another group of “accursed infidels,” the racial Jews within the borders of the land promised to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (Genesis 15:16-21). Body of Questions In light of the above background, the following questions will be addressed with additional supporting facts: Question 1: “The public impression has been that Iran finances Hezbollah, and that Saudi Arabia financed Saad Hariri and Fath al-Islam. Can you offer convincing, specific evidence that CIA/Saudi Arabia finances Hezbollah?” Response 1: There is no question that CIA/Al Qaeda/Saudi Arabia finances Shiite Hezbollah. The leaders of Hezbollah must follow orders or they will be terminated as was President Kennedy in 1963, as was Hezbollah’s Abbas alMusawi in 1992, as was King Faisal of Saudi Arabia in 1975. (It is most intriguing that Faisal was murdered by a close relative who had just returned from the United States. No doubt, Georgetown University was involved as per the Hollywood American movie/video titled Syriana.) 7 The open but false policy of the CIA is to oppose Shiite Hezbollah (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/01/10/wleb10.xml) in support of Lebanon’s Sunni Moslem Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. (Siniora was trained by Jesuit Coadjutors in Beirut at the American University—once the Syrian Protestant College (1866-1920) but now manned by Knight of Malta-directed CIA assets—and was employed at Citibank in New York City, said bank being ruled by the Knights of Malta. (A past head of Citicorp, the holding company for Citibank, was U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and JFK assassin, Knight of Malta William Simon.) Yet the secret but true policy of the Jesuit/Nazi/SMOM-ruled CIA is to back Shiite Hezbollah through Saudi Arabia for the annihilation of all “Christians” (including “liberal” Roman Catholics) in Lebanon. It is most telling to observe that there are no more Jewish communities in Lebanon or Iraq, the poverty-stricken majority Jews having been forced to flee to the pope’s intended Jewish graveyard, Israel. Lebanon is to be a complete and total, political Islamic state, as are Turkey, Egypt, and Syria. No Christian of any stripe is to ever be seated in government if Wahhabi Saudi-financed Shiite Hezbollah and Syria (ruled by Jesuits in Damascus) succeed in fulfilling its mission. Lebanon’s old, antiJesuit, French protectors are gone (the Order being re-admitted into France in 1942 after which, in 1943, Jesuit Coadjutors Henri Petain and Pierre Laval cut loose Lebanon for the future annihilation of Lebanon’s Christians by the Black Pope’s Masonically-led Moslem hordes as was the case in Orthodox Armenia). The Jesuits rule the region via their Provincial in Beirut. With his help, nearby Orthodox Southern Cyprus, now in the European Community, is to be taken back by Turkey as a consolation prize for not being allowed into the pope’s Roman Catholic European Union, thereby evacuating and/or destroying the Greek Orthodox people of Cyprus which destruction began in 1974 at the direction of the pope’s CFR/Knight of Malta “Court Jew,” Henry Kissinger (“Henry Killinger,” as the Cypriots call him). This means the 8 expulsion of the British military and British ex-patriots from Cyprus, and the Islamic-block nations are to be united under the all-seeing eye of the Black Pope’s Jesuit Assistant ruling that Moslem-populated Jesuit Assistancy. (Presently there are ten Jesuit Assistancies in the world.) This united Moslem block will then enter into an alliance with Russia for the purposed invasion of North America at the close of Rome’s Twenty-first Century Crusade. Presently, the Jesuits are “extirpating” the Christians in Lebanon in the same, exact manner as they are “extirpating” the Orthodox Christians in Serbia. Roman Catholic Croats and Moslem Albanians, backed by America’s Jesuit/CFR-directed military and CIA, murdered tens of thousands of Orthodox Serbs in the 1990s. At this moment the Order is using NATO to back the same two factions, the Croats and Albanians, continuing the killing of those most “accursed and obstinate Serbian heretics.” Jesuit Roman Fascism (its greatest military champion being the CFR-ruled U.S. government with two huge fasces on display in the House of Representatives) and Islam work together today to “extirpate all heretics from the face of the earth.” That combination was used to put down the Spanish Republic from 1936 to 1939 via Francisco Franco directed by Cardinal Segura; to murder the Serbs during World War II via Himmler’s SS-directed, Franciscan-led, Croatian Ustashi overseen by Archbishop Stepinac from 1941 to 1945; and to attack the anti-Roman Catholic, Coptic Christian nation of Ethiopia via Mussolini directed by Cardinal Secretary of State Eugenio Pacelli, killing 700,000 Black Ethiopians. That extirpation now extends to Lebanon. We now must focus on Wahhabi Saudi Arabia. The Jesuits instituted Wahhabi Islam in the mid-1700s via the British Empire. One of its key operatives within the British Secret Intelligence Service was 33rd Degree Freemason Sir Richard Burton who made a pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina in 1853. By 1932 the British working with Mussolini (whose advisor was the 9 Secretary to the Society of Jesus, Pietro Tacchi-Venturi) established the Order’s oil bonanza within the heart of Islam, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Mussolini, hailed as the “Protector of Islam” in 1937, gave arms and supplies to Saudi Arabia’s first King, Ibn Saud. Il Duce Benito Mussolini, 1937 Roman Catholic Fascist “Protector of Islam” Advised by Jesuit Pietro Tacchi-Venturi Saud’s personal advisor was British Intelligence agent and English Knight of Malta Sir John Philby who was himself a Wahhabi Moslem. In 1933, the Saudis gave their oil concession to Standard Oil of California (SOCAL), controlled by the Knights of Malta through Rockefeller 10 ownership. Years later, one of those Knights active in SOCAL would be JFK assassin and CIA Director, John McCone. The 1930s commenced the Order’s quest of hording the world’s gold and oil. The wealth of the once mighty, White Protestant nations of Western Civilization would be redirected into the coffers of Saudi Arabia after the Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945). Simultaneously, America’s oil wells would be capped, its Alaskan pipeline would be used for the oil needs of Japan and Americans would pay more at the pumps, further indebting the American Empire to Saudi Arabia, which hates the Lord’s Abrahamic covenant-bound, racial Hebrew/Jewish/Israelites. (Not a single synagogue or Bible-reading church is allowed in the pope’s Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.) The massive wealth directed into Saudi Arabia would then be used to build the commercial powerhouse of Wahhabi-Islamic, Jew-hating Dubai while secretly building an international Masonic Islamic Terrorist Network. That Network would be overseen by the Black Pope’s International Intelligence Community and its money would be laundered through the Order’s International Banking Community. The Black Pope’s International Drug Trade worked by the Sicilian Mafia (overseen by the Archbishop of Palermo) and orchestrated by the Jesuit General’s CIA-led, International, Intelligence Community (including Al Qaeda) and International Crime Syndicate would also be used to finance his Terrorist Network. All the while, those historic White Anglo-Saxon Protestant nations outside of continental Europe (England, Scotland, America, Canada, South Africa, Rhodesia, and Australia)—having abandoned the public honoring of the Reformation English Bible, The Authorized King James Version of 1611—would continue to descend into the status of mere third world nations with huge national debts, no middle class, no individual liberty and treasonous political leaders in the employ of the Vatican thereby returning the Modern Era back to the Dark Ages when the pope was the universal monarch of the world. 11 Saudi Arabia is the bank for Rome’s International Islamic Terrorist Network. (In the 1800s it was the Order’s International Anarchist Terrorist Network, which assassinated at least fifty heads of state, including Tzar Alexander II (1881) and President William McKinley (1901)). If the Jesuits have ruled Saudi Arabia since its inception in 1932; if the Jesuits have directed the CIA since its inception since 1947; and if the Order dictates policy to the Saudi monarchs as it has since King Ibn Saud; if the Company is building its Masonic Islamic International Terrorist Network for the purpose serving as a common enemy to unite Europe under Rome (via the European Community) while using this same CIA-directed Islamic Terrorist Network to financially and culturally destroy apostate Protestant Western Civilization; if the Black Pope’s “oil bonanza” of Saudi Arabia finances Al Qaeda; WHY WOULD THE BLACK POPE NOT SUPPORT SHIITE HEZBOLLAH???? As the covert master of Saudi Arabia, the Black Pope uses his Wahhabi Kingdom to finance his international, Islamic jihadist Crusaders—as secretly intended from the very day of the Kingdom’s creation. Hezbollah is one of the jihadist groups according to Rome’s CFR-controlled U.S. News and World Report. Published on Dec. 15, 2003, we read from “The Saudi Connection,” page 28: “The high-flying Carlyle Group has made fortunes doing deals with the Saudis. Among Carlyle’s top advisers have been former [SMOM] President George H. W. Bush; James Baker, his secretary of state; and [SMOM] Frank Carlucci, a former secretary of defense. If that wasn’t enough, there was the staggering amount of Saudi investment in America—as much as $600 billion in U.S. banks and stock markets.” “That kind of clout may help explain why the House of Saud could be so dismissive of American concerns on terrorism. Official inquiries about bin Laden went unanswered by Riyadh. When Hezbollah terrorists killed 19 U.S. troops with a massive truck bomb at Khobar Towers in Dharhan [Saudi Arabia] in 1996, Saudi officials stonewalled, then shut the FBI out of the investigation.” 12 Thus, CIA/Saudi Arabia finances Hezbollah as it does Al Qaeda. Further, both jihadist factions are controlled by the Moslem Brotherhood which is directed by high, Islamic Freemasons from the Grand Lodges of Cairo and Istanbul. This is never spoken of in any alternative circles. Question 2: “What is the purpose behind the emergence of Fath a-Islam in Lebanon?” Response 2: Fatah al-Islam (“Conquest of Islam”) is a radical Sunni Islamist terrorist group with links to CIA/Al Qaeda. Formed in November of 2006 and led by Palestinian refugee Shaker al-Abssi, it gained notoriety by open combat with Lebanese forces at the Nahr al-Bared Palestinian refugee camp in May/June of 2007. The pope’s CFR-controlled U.S. government openly classified the group as a terrorist organization, while at this moment there are sixty-two (62) Islamic terrorist training camps on American soil under the covert direction of the CIA/FBI. (This fact was provided to the author by a former Arab Palestinian who was a member of the Moslem Brotherhood and a Palestinian street-fighter in Israel. He is now a Bible-believing Christian and his ministry is to Arab Moslems in America, leading them to the true Lord Jesus Christ of the Reformation Bible.) Al-Abssi was backed by the Syrian government as well as the Lebanese government for the ridiculous reason of “fighting Hezbollah.” Secretly, both Sunni Fatah al-Islam and Shiite Hezbollah work together for the complete Islamic conversion of Lebanon while making incursions into Israel for the killing of racial Jews—as intended by the Jesuit General. The same policy will be used here in the U.S. It is most intriguing to know that U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, a CFR member and 33rd Degree Freemason, and Saudi National Security Advisor Prince Bandar (“Bush”) bin Sultan have provided funding to Fatah al-Islam “to counter” Shiite Hezbollah. The truth is both factions work 13 together at the top via their leaders beholden to the Jesuit Provincial in Beirut as did the leaders of Nicaragua’s Contras and Sandinistas who served the Archbishop of New York City, John Cardinal O’Connor. The Jesuits have used their CFR-controlled U.S. government to openly finance a faction that is intended to lose after its purpose is accomplished. This was done with the anti-communist Hungarian patriots in 1956, the anti-communist Cuban patriots in 1961 at the Bay of Pigs, and the anti-communist Nicaraguan Contras in the 1980s. This may also be the case with Fatah al-Islam, built to be betrayed in the future—but this author doubts it. The group is backed by CIA/Al Qaeda, is financed by both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Thus it appears that Fatah al-Islam will be used to continue to draw to the forefront the real, uncontrollable enemies of Rome’s Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists ruling Israel for execution by the CIA/Mossad or IDF, while destabilizing the Lebanese government to the end that Lebanon will not protect its “Christians” of whatever stripe. Question 3: “What is the hierarchy in Beirut?” Response 3: The Jesuit Provincial in Beirut is the man of total power in the region. That man is Jan Bronsveld as previously given. He has the complete support of the Black Pope’s International Intelligence Community, including the CIA, the Mossad and both Lebanese and Syrian Intelligence. Question 4: “Who are the assassins among the Jesuits in Beirut?” Response 4: The assassins in the area can be drawn upon from many factions controlled by the Jesuits. Assassins could be used from any one of the Masonic Islamic terrorist groups, any one of the national intelligence agencies overseen by the Knights of Malta, a member of the Order’s Masonic/SMOM International Crime Syndicate, or “lone nuts” at the disposal of the 14 Company. In any event, no high-level assassination is carried out without a direct order from the Jesuit General advised by his Assistants in Rome. The murders are planned after extensive reports from the General’s Provincials in the region and under the advisement of his Assistants after pointed deliberation. The “Father General’s” Assistant for the region is fully apprised as to every significant event in the Near East Vice-Province by meticulous reports from Jesuit Provincial Bronsveld. Question 5: “What Lebanese politicians work for them (& in what capacity)?” Response 5: The most prominent Lebanese politicians working for the Jesuit Provincial in Beirut are none other than your own Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora (19 July 2005-Present) and President Emile Lahoud (24 November 1998-Present). Siniora is a Sunni Moslem, Lahoud is a Maronite Roman Catholic whose mother was an Armenian from Syria. (According to the Constitution, the President is to be a Maronite Catholic and the Prime Minister is to be a Sunni Moslem.) Lahoud was commander-in-chief of the army and, thus in fact, a military dictator from 1989 to 1998. In 1998 he was elected president and is the only “Christian” head of state in an Arab country. Any opposition to him is eliminated, thanks to Jesuit intrigue via Rome’s intelligence agencies in the region. Former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri was assassinated by the chiefs of Lebanon’s security forces because he opposed an additional presidential term for Lahoud as backed by the Order’s Masonic President Bashar Assad of Syria, the Jesuits controlling Damascus via Syrian Intelligence. It was reported by the New YorkTimes that Lahoud went swimming on the day of Hariri’s murder. Lahoud is clearly a pawn for Jesuit Provincial Jan Bronsveld and must be removed if Lebanon is to ever be normalized. 15 Siniora is also Jesuit-controlled, he being tied to international finance via the Knights of Malta at Citibank/Citicorp for which reason he has the backing of Skull and Bonesman President George W. Bush (whose father and uncle are both Knights of Malta), the pope’s United Nations and the surrounding Arab countries. He has included the criminal Hezbollah in his government (as per the desires of the Jesuit Provincial) but refuses to have any dealings with General Michael Aoun’s “Free Patriotic Movement.” Aoun is a true Lebanese patriot and is in great danger of being assassinated by an agent of Rome as was ex-Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. General Aoun’s late enemy was the Jesuit-trained President, Elias Hrawi. (As mentioned, Hariri was murdered by Jesuit Coadjutors within Lebanon’s intelligence services, which killing was then blamed on Syria with the secret collusion of the Syrian President. Both Siniora and Lahoud were parties to the assassination and will never be prosecuted for the crime. Meanwhile, the Lebanese people are kept agitated against Syria when their greatest enemies are in Beirut. This same tactic is being used on the American people, they believing that the Moslem world is their enemy when the greatest threat to their personal security and happiness is in Washington, D.C., i.e., Jesuit Georgetown University ruling the CFR/Bush Crime Family in the White House.) Question 6: “Can you outline what is actually taking place in Lebanon and what is the objective for the country.” Response 6: There are several objectives regarding Lebanon. First, it must be a staging base for continued attacks into Israel. Jesuit Coadjutor Shimon Peres is a co-conspirator against the Lord’s beloved Hebrew/Jewish people in Israel, along with Omert, Assad, Lahoud, Siniora, the Saud Dynasty, Abbas (who wrote his doctoral dissertation on the collusion between the Labor Zionists and the Nazis in carrying out the Eurasian Jewish Holocaust—which thesis is true!), not to mention Bush, Blair and Putin and their infamous 16 “Roadmap Policy” designed to purposely bring war into Israel for the destruction of the Moslem Mosques on the pope’s Temple Mount and the killing of thousands of “accursed” Moslems and Jews in Israel. (The author is convinced this is one of the paramount purposes for the pope’s Americanled Crusade against Islam, called a “Crusade” by Bush himself!) For it was the infamous Jesuit Francis Xavier who cried: “Put me in a place where there are no Jews or Moslems.” {1} The Second objective to be achieved in Lebanon is the elimination of any true, Bible-based, Christian influence in the land. This will be effected by the Jesuits using their “Sword of the Church,” fanatical Islam. Islam is nothing more than Roman Catholicism for the Arab peoples of color, the half-brothers of racial Jews who also have Biblical promises to inherit. The parallels are striking and once analyzed it becomes evident that the Papacy created Islam to annihilate “heretic” non-papal Christians, “liberal” Roman Catholics and “perfidious” racial Jews. This continues to be Rome’s design and use of Islam (especially with the Black Pope’s CIA-led Masonic Islamic International Terrorist Network), while simultaneously killing millions of Moslems in clearing the way for the building of the third Hebrew Temple for the last and final pope turned “Antichrist” to be worshipped therein sometime after this Crusade is terminated. Therefore, we will continue to see the betrayal of Lebanese Christians by the government of Lebanon (as we presently observe with the Serbian Orthodox Christians) culminating in their murder by the fanatical forces of a Jesuit-ruled, Nazi/CIA/Al Qaeda/Wahhabi Islam which is the secret master of both Sunni and Shiite Moslem leadership. Once enough Shiites have been __________________________________________________________________ 1. Dr. E. Boyd Barrett, Ex-Irish Jesuit, Rome Stoops to Conquer, (New York: Julian Messner, Inc., 1935) p. 180. 17 murdered, Islam will be united under a common banner after the mosques in Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem are brought down by the secret forces of the Jesuit General. (This scenario is portrayed in the movie/video The Order featuring Roman Catholic Jean-Claude van Damme.) Rome will blame her American Empire she fully intends to destroy, just as she destroyed the Third Reich after she had used Hitler to mass-murder the “accursed,” antiCommunist, Russian Orthodox peoples, the “heretic” German Lutheran people, the “heretic and liberal” Protestant peoples of Britain and Europe (especially Czechoslovakia) and the “perfidious” Jews of Eurasia. Question 7: “Who is financing Lebanon?” Response 7: The sponsors of Lebanon are the pope’s international bankers financially controlling America, Britain, Europe and Saudi Arabia. Those bankers include the Chairman of the pope’s Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Ben Bernanke, one of the pope’s “Court Jews.” The Fed extends credit to the U.S. Congress which then gives U.S. foreign aid to Lebanon. This makes Lebanon the servant of the Black Pope’s American Empire. Question 8: “At the end of this email, there is a list of some assassinated Lebanese political figures. Can you offer specific details on who killed any or all of them and why each was killed?” Response 8: I do not have any specific details, but once the reader becomes acquainted with the apparatus of power controlled by the Society of Jesus and its aims, it is relatively easy to deduct why each and every one of the victims listed was assassinated. I shall attempt to add details and the reasons why two leaders were assassinated in addition to former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. This will help the reader establish a formula for finding the answer as to “Who benefits” and “Why.” 18 Bachir Gemayel: former President-Elect, founder of Lebanese Forces, son of Pierre Gemayel, assassinated on September 14, 1982. The author’s “gut feeling” is that he was assassinated for truly opposing the rising power of fanatical Islam in the country, including the PLO. This is true. Gemayel was a Roman Catholic Maronite “Christian” trained by the Jesuits at their St. Joseph University in Beirut. He led a right-wing fascist group of patriots, called the Kataeb Party, which the Jesuit Order, over time, betrayed into the hands of its Moslems. This includes the murder of Elie Hobeika who participated with the Israelis in the massacre of Palestinians in Nahr al-Bared refugee camp in Lebanon (mentioned above on page 13) after the murder of Gemayel in 1982. The same betrayal was done with the leaders of the rightwing Contras in Nicaragua, the right-wing Cubans at the Bay of Pigs, and the right-wing Chinese led by Chiang Kai-shek in 1949. Right-wing Jesuit fascism always loses in the end to its enemies after those fascists kill the peoples targeted by the Order. In this case it was unarmed Palestinian men, women and children in a refugee camp surrounded by the pope’s Israeli Defense Forces. The lesson we learn from Jesuit-trained Bachir Gamayel is that the Jesuit Brotherhood will set up one of their own students who, after graduation, was then placed in a key position of power, only to sacrifice him in the end after his usefulness has been fulfilled. His execution may be the result of disobedience as in the case of Benito Mussolini (who refused to deport the Jews of Rome to Auschwitz due to the influence of his Jewish mistress) and Yitzak Rabin (who refused to consent to making Jerusalem an international city to be shared with Arab Moslems, i.e., “Palestinians”) or merely to placate another enemy faction also under Jesuit domination. Renè Moawad: President for seventeen (17) days (1989). Also trained by Jesuits at St. Joseph University in Beirut, he brought hope seeking to end the civil war that raged from 1975 to 1990. Seemingly a virtuous leader and loved by his people, he said: 19 “There can be no country or dignity without unity of the people, and there can be no unity without agreement, and there can be no agreement without conciliation, and there can be no conciliation without forgiveness and compromise." This, the Jesuit Order would never allow. Hatred must be festered on the side of the Moslems against all “Christians” if Lebanon is to be conquered by Jesuit-directed Islam. He truly could have brought a real peace to Lebanon. Therefore, he was assassinated with a car-bomb killing an additional twenty-three (23) people. His murder was never investigated. The common enemy of Syria was blamed, but it was the Order’s Lebanese Intelligence Services who were at the bottom of the execution. Again, the Order sacrificed one of their own students “for the greater glory of God,” the god who sits in St. Peter’s Chair! As in the case of every political assassination, the intelligence community of that nation carries out the termination order issued by the Black Pope. In this way no truly representative, liberal government ruling for the benefit of the people can ever rise to popular power. So it is in Lebanon today; so it is in the United States of America. This is the conclusion of the author’s analysis and responses to the questions posed by Elias Aoun. The author thanks Mr. Aoun for the opportunity of providing this service and looks forward to many other opportunities of being of aid in resolving the international disorder caused by the Order, the Society of Jesus. 20 Affidavit Power of the Society of Jesus in Russia From Czar Alexander I to the Present I, Eric Jon Phelps, Author of Vatican Assassins: “Wounded In The House Of My Friends”, Third Edition, concerning the history of the ubiquitous, Counter Reformation Society of Jesus in Russia, do solemnly state: 1. That in 1723 AD Czar Peter the Great expelled the Society of Jesus from Orthodox Russia for attempting to usurp the Romanov throne and reduce its citizens to the absolute Temporal Power of the Pope of Rome; 2. That by the mid-Eighteenth Century the power of the Society of Jesus had grown so great, that nearly every monarch in Europe was under the power of a Jesuit confessor or adviser directing affairs of state; 3. That due to this vast Jesuit power employed by the Jesuit Superior General to create commercial monopolies as well as assassinate selected enemies of the Society, be they popes or kings, the Order was expelled from Roman Catholic Portugal in 1759, from Roman Catholic France in 1764, from Roman Catholic Spain in 1767, and from Roman Catholic Malta in 1768; 4. That due to the most powerful European Roman Catholic monarchs, including the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, expelling the Company of Jesus from their nations and empires, Franciscan Pope Clement XIV, after a four-year investigation, promulgated the lengthy Bull, Dominus ac Redemptor Noster, forever suppressing and extinguishing the Society of Jesus in 1773; 5. That because of the papacy’s suppression of the Society of Jesus, Pope Clement XIV was poisoned with a measured dose of “aquetta,” subjecting the “Vicar of Christ” to excruciating pain and prolonged suffering before he died in 1774; 6. That because of the Order’s suppression throughout the Holy Roman Empire as well as the entire Roman Catholic world, the Society sought and received protection from non-Roman Catholic monarchs. Three of those monarchs (all of whom were racial Germans) were Frederick II “the Great” of Prussia, Protector of the German Lutheran Church; Catherine II “the Great” of Russia, Protector of the Russian Orthodox Church; and King George III, Protector of the English Anglican Church and Protestant Faith of Great Britain; 7. That as a result of the Order’s protection from both Frederick and Catherine, Roman Catholic Poland was partitioned by those monarchs, eliminating the rule of Poland’s Roman Catholic monarch, thereby rendering the pope’s Bull of none effect in that nation, saving the Order’s massive property holdings and treasure from confiscation; 8. That as a result of the Order’s admittance into Russia, the Company established its headquarters therein, and began to plot the neutralization of all anti-papal priests and nuns within the Russian Orthodox Church; 9. That as a result of the Order’s admittance into Russia, the Company sought to usurp and control the power of the Romanov monarchy, proposing to submit both Czar and Orthodox Patriarch to the Temporal Power of a future pope of Rome within the control of the Order; 10. That as a result of the Order’s admittance into Russia, Empress Catherine created the “Pale of Settlement” for Russian Jews, forcing them into a specific geographical region, later to be exterminated by Masonic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin whose Gestapo and NKVD worked together during World War II; 11. That as a result of the Order’s suppression by Pope Clement XIV, the Company founded a host of other secret societies including the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776; 12. That having founded the Bavarian Illuminati from Ingolstadt College near Munich, Bavaria, the Company used its new occult secret society to consolidate all Masonic power into its hands, thereby creating Illuminized Freemasonry, directed at its apex by the Jesuit General; 2 of 9 13. That having established its invisible power in Russia, Prussia, Poland and England, the Company then launched the Masonic French Revolution and subsequent Napoleonic Wars, taking vengeance on all enemies daring to curtail the power of the Order; 14. That during the Napoleonic Wars, Masonic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor Napoleon Bonaparte I drove the Knights of Malta from Malta, the Order finding refuge in Russia via the power of Czar Paul I, later murdered by the Company for refusing to wage war on Lutheran Germany; 15. That during the time of the Napoleonic Wars, the acting Jesuit General in Russia reduced the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta to his service in anticipation of the Order’s formal restoration by the pope, which restoration would come in 1814; 16. That as a result of Napoleon’s Jesuit War on the Vatican, on the Roman Catholic monarchs of Europe, and on the Protestant nations of Europe, including Germany and the Calvinist Republic of the United Netherlands, Pope Pius VII restored the Society of Jesus to its former power in August of 1814, one month prior to the commencement of the Congress of Vienna that restored the Papal States to the rule of the Pope; 17. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna (1814-1815), the Company of Jesus set out to destroy all constitutional republics, especially the Constitutional Republic of these United States of America, considered to be the font of all anti-divine right and anti-papal movements in Europe; 18. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna and the Order’s quest to control the Romanov monarchy in Russia, Czar Alexander I issued his famous “ukase” in 1820 expelling the Society of Jesus from all the Russias. Knowing the Order would then seek to secretly overthrow his imperial power via Grand Orient Freemasonry, in 1822 Bible-friendly Alexander closed every Masonic lodge in the empire; 19. That as a result of the expulsion of the Society of Jesus from Russia and the closing of all Masonic lodges within the empire, Czar Alexander I was given “the poison cup” in 1825 in accordance with the bloody Fourth Vow taken by the highest of the Professed Jesuits within the Order; 3 of 9 20. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna, the Secret Treaty of Verona was convened by Prussia, Austria and Russia (1822), plotting the overthrow of the Protestant-Calvinist, constitutionally limited, antiabsolute monarchy, government of these United States of America; 21. That as a result of the Secret Treaty of Verona, James Monroe issued his beloved Monroe Doctrine (1823), warning all European Powers to stay out of the Western Hemisphere to the chagrin of the Jesuit Order; 22. That as a result of the Order’s past expulsion from Orthodox Russia by Czars Peter the Great and Alexander I, the Jesuits contrived another means by which it would be able to reduce the Russian Orthodox monarchy and peoples, to the Temporal Power of the Pope now governed by the Jesuit General: that means would be Marxian SocialistCommunism. For the Company had perfected the socialist tenets of Sir Thomas More’s Utopia while the Order had operated its 59 socialistcommunist “Reductions” in Paraguay (1609-1759). These tenets were codified into The Communist Manifesto, its penholder being Masonic Jew Karl Marx, its authors being the Jesuits resident in England; 23. That as a result of the practical effects of Napoleon’s war on papal political tyranny coupled with the preaching of the Reformation Bible throughout Europe and America during the 19th Century, the Jesuit Order was suppressed once again throughout Europe, so much so, the Company has called it “the Century of Disaster;” 24. That during the “Century of Disaster,” the Jesuit Order remained formally expelled from Russia since 1820. Beginning with the reign of the great Alexander II, Russia was beginning to experience political liberty at the hand if her greatest of Czars. But on the day he was to sign a written Constitution limiting the power of the monarchy and abolishing the secret police (the Okhrana), he was assassinated by the Anarchists, hired assassins of the Jesuits, later to murder President McKinley; 25. That as a result of Alexander II’s brutal murder, the assassination having succeeded on the fifth attempt, the only Jew involved in the murder was blamed by successor Alexander III who then launched a bloody pogrom killing tens of thousands of Jews throughout Russia; 4 of 9 26. That as a result of Alexander III’s pogroms, the Order instilled a hatred for the Romanov dynasty in the hearts of Russian Jews. This was necessary as the Order was to use its obedient Masonic Jews to lead the Bolshevik Revolution giving the appearance to the world that Bolshevik Communism was in fact “Jewish Bolshevik Communism;” 27. That as a result of Alexander III’s pogroms, his son and successor, Czar Nicholas II, would launch the bloodiest pogroms in Russian history, further driving the Jews of Russia into the Order’s Bolshevik Communist revolutionary camp; 28. That in preparation for the Order’s overthrow of Orthodox Russia pursuant to the Council of Trent, Moscow being “the Third Rome,” the Jesuits trained their prize student for the task, Josef Stalin. Educated by Roman Catholic Capuchin priests in Gori, Georgia, Stalin was given a scholarship by those priests to attend the Orthodox Tiflis Seminary in Tiflis, Georgia. There, under the tutorship of secret Jesuit, Orthodox Father Demetrius, Stalin was taught the doctrines of Marxian Communism in preparation for the Bolshevik Revolution (1917); 29. That as a result of the Order’s control of Czars Alexander III and Nicolas II, while exciting anti-Czarist fury among the Jews of Russia, the Bolshevik Revolution was a success. From 1920 to 1922 the Order conducted a Bolshevik Civil War throughout Russia, killing off all nationalist resistance led by Orthodox patriots. The Jesuit-led Bolsheviks totally decapitated all leaders within the Russian Orthodox Church who were against the Papacy, over 5,000 priests and nuns losing their lives; 30. That as a result of the successful Red Bolshevik Civil War against the White Russian Orthodox, Masonic President Warren G. Harding gave over 60 million dollars to the Reds in 1922---the same year Stalin readmitted the Jesuits into Russia---further entrenching their rule; 31. That as a result of the successful Red Bolshevik Revolution, Edmund A. Walsh, an American Jesuit priest from Georgetown University, was dispatched to Moscow to negotiate for the Vatican with the Bolsheviks. From 1922 to 1924 Walsh resided in the new, Jesuit slave state of the “USSR” naming Josef Stalin Secretary of the Communist Party; 5 of 9 32. That as a result of the elimination of the Romanov Dynasty and the subordination of the Russian Orthodox clergy, Edmund Walsh, in his Total Empire: The Roots and Progress of World Communism (Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, 1951), page 28, wrote about the Russian Revolution of 1917, that it was, “. . . the most significant single political event in the history of Western civilization since the decline and disappearance of the Roman Empire.”; 33. That the reason Jesuit Edmund Walsh put such tremendous weight upon the success of the Bolshevik Revolution lay in the fact the Order had used its Marxist Socialist-Communism to submit its old enemy, Orthodox Moscow, “the Third Rome,” to the Roman Papal Caesar. Constantinople, “the Second Rome,” had fallen to Rome’s apparent enemy of Islam in 1453 AD, thereby conveniently benefitting the papacy; Moscow, had fallen to Rome’s apparent enemy of Communism in 1917 AD, also conveniently benefitting the papacy, the world in fact to be deprived of the truth that both Islam and Communism are creations of the Vatican; 34. That the Jesuits were now in total control of the Bolshevik Communists ruling the USSR with deadly cruelty, the Julian calendar was replaced with the Gregorian calendar (1917) composed by the Jesuit Christopher Clavius; that every Jewish leader during the Revolution was slowly and systematically executed or murdered save one, Lazar M. Kaganovitch; that Jesuit Coadjutor Josef Stalin launched a murderous inquisition against the Orthodox peoples of the Ukraine, starving from 7 to 10 million people in one year; that the inquisition extended to Protestant Mennonites, Lutherans and Baptists throughout the USSR in accordance with the Black Pope’s Counter Reformation Council of Trent; 35. That the Jesuits were now in control of the USSR, Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh sat in the White House next to his servant, Masonic American President Franklin D. Roosevelt, when the president formally recognized the USSR as a sovereign nation in 1933; 36. That as a result of FDR recognizing the USSR, massive projects were begun by American cartel-capitalists, including Masonic Henry Ford furnishing the Gorky auto plant mechanizing the Soviet War Machine; 6 of 9 37. That because the Jesuit Order plotted to use the White Protestant, Baptist and Roman Catholic Middle Class of its American Empire to build Rome’s Red Communist monster in Moscow, the USSR was made a partner of the Allies during World War II, FDR giving 11.3 billion dollars in Lend Lease funds and materials to Stalin, never to be repaid to the American people; 38. That as a result of the Jesuit Order being in total control of its CFRdirected American government since no later than 1865 with Rome’s assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, FDR gave all of Eastern Europe into the hands of the USSR at the Yalta Conference at the command of Jesuits Harry Hopkins and Averell Harriman, in preparation for the ensuing Cold War Hoax during which the Society of Jesus would use its CIA and KGB to destroy all genuine, Eastern European /Russian Bible-believers as well as all true nationalists, furthering the Order’s quest for world government under a Jesuit-directed Pope of Rome; 39. That during the Pope’s Cold War Hoax (premised upon the hoax of mutual airborne nuclear war as explained in VAIII) the Order’s CFRcontrolled American government provided the financing and technology for the building of the Black Pope’s Soviet War Machine, erecting the Kama River truck factory during the 1970s facilitated by Jesuit Fordham University-trained Knight of Malta William J. Casey before becoming the Director of Rome’s pro-Nazi, Central Intelligence Agency; 40. That upon the conclusion of the Jesuit General’s Second Thirty Years’ War (1914-1945), the American OSS/CIA continued to work together with the Soviet NKVD/KGB throughout the entirety of the Cold War Hoax; that this secret alliance is referred to in the Jesuit Order’s Hollywood Theater release, The Good Shepherd (2006); 41. That during this time of secret, mutual collaboration between the American, Soviet and British intelligence agencies, stupendous acts of treason were committed against the American people, including CIA Counterintelligence Chief James Angleton giving many of the Agency’s top secrets over to Anatoli Golitsin, a Soviet KGB officer in the US. Anthony Cave Brown makes this clear in his Treason in the Blood (New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1994), page 555: 7 of 9 “Angleton . . . demonstrated his confidence in Golitsin [a supposed defector] by making available to him the CIA files on the personnel of the main operating section of the CIA in the Cold War with Russia, the thousand-odd men and women of the Soviet Division.”; 42. That during the Cold War Hoax, both the American and Soviet intelligence agencies were manned with ex-Nazis, the papacy saving its Nazi Gestapo/SS/SD inquisitional mass-murderers from justice under the guise of fighting either “Communism” in the East or “Capitalism” in the West as proven by author John Loftus in his Unholy Trinity: How the Vatican’s Nazi Networks Betrayed Western Intelligence to the Soviets (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1991); 43. That during the Cold War Hoax, former Nazi intelligence chief Reinhard Gehlen ran the West German BND in conjunction with the East German SSD, Stasi. For ex-SS Nazi Hans Felfe, Gehlen’s right-hand man in the BND, also worked for the East German SSD/Stasi for over twenty years; thus, BND Chief Reinhard Gehlen and SSD Chief Marcus Wolf worked together for over twenty years perfecting the East-West united intelligence community subject to the Jesuit Papacy, partitioned Berlin serving as a foremost rendezvous for East-West agencies: 44. That during the Cold War Hoax, Moscow served as a training base for the Jesuit Order’s world revolutionary socialist communists, including Fidel Castro, Michael (“Martin Luther”) King, Yasser Arafat, Jesuittrained Bill Clinton and indeed, president-elect Barry Davis Obama; 45. That during the Pope’s Cold War Hoax the Jesuit Papacy in control of both East and West, was perfecting its internationalist/anti-nationalist socialist-communist revolution; its Unified International Intelligence Community; its International Banking Cartel; its International Mafia Organized Crime Syndicate; its International Drug Trade; its plot to assemble a military coalition of nations to one day attack and subjugate the “heretic and liberal” American peoples, said coalition having been built and financed by the Pope’s CFR-controlled American government; that the culmination of this plot will be a Sino-Soviet-Muslim invasion into North America ending what is left of the Grand and Glorious White Northern European Protestant Reformation; 8 of 9 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK For the COUNTY OF KINGS Index No.: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------x 21948-2012 Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, -against- Petitioner, HAKEEM JEFFRIES ET AL.,, Respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------------------x • • • ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR A FOR TRO, PRELIMINARY, INJUNCTION, PROTECTION, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PROHIBITION ORDER Memorandum in support of Order to Show Cause Affidavit in support of Order to Show Cause Ex 1 – November 9, 2012 duly notified the respondents of COMPLAINT and NOTICE Ex 2 - November 16, 2016 response to NOTICE Joshua Pepper NYS Assistant Attorney General Ex 3 – December 4, 2008 Order and Decision Article 78 Petition Index No.: 2008-29641 Ex 4 – Index No.: 2008-29641 November 3, 2008 proceeding Transcript Ex 5 - October 15, 2012 duly filed a Notice of Release without Consideration Ex 6 – November 14, 2012 Notice of Petition and Verified Petition Ex 7 - November 16, 2012 Affidavit of service of Notice of Petition, Verified Petition and Notice Ex 8 – Donald Trump’s latest November 1, 2012 Press release Ex 9 – Sheriff Arpaio of Maricopa County Arizona with June 12, 2012 Affidavit Ex 10 – Graphics Expert Paul E. Irey work published by the Washington Times on November 19, 2012 Ex 11 – Intelligence Expert testimony by Pamela Barnett that Unvetted Obama Never Had To Undergo Security Clearance Background Check Ex 12 – November 8, 2012 Affidavit of Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III United States Navy Retired Ex 13 – 2005 Private Report to Elias Aoun on those responsible for the assassination of Rafic Baha El Deen Al-Hariri, and June 29, 2010 Affidavit of Eric Jon Phelps entitled Power of the Society of Jesus in Russia From Czar Alexander I to the Present; Dated: Brooklyn, New York November ___, 2012 ____________________________________ Christopher Earl Strunk in esse, petitioner 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281, Brooklyn, New York 11238. (845) 901-6767 E-mail: chris@strunk.ws 6 AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit H Workspace Webmail :: Print https://email06.secureserver.net/view_print_multi.php?uidArray=20444|... Print | Close Window Subject: Case Name: STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. BOARD OF ELECTIONS Index Number: 021948/2012 From: "Bill Van Allen" Date: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 5:46 pm To: Cc: "\"PAMELA BARNETT" , "Dr. Orly Taitz Esq" , WebCivil Supreme - Case Detail Court: Index Number: Case Name: Case Type: Track: RJI Filed: Date NOI Due: NOI Filed: Disposition Date: Calendar Number: Jury Status: Justice Name: DAVID SCHMIDT (PT. 47) Kings Civil Supreme 021948/2012 STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. BOARD OF ELECTIONS Special Proceedings Standard 11/16/2012 Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff: CHRISTOPER-EARL STRUNK - Prose Attorney/Firm For Defendant: HAKEEM JEFFRIES - Prose Attorney Type: Pro se Atty. Status: Active Attorney Type: Pro se Atty. Status: Active   Copyright © 2003-2012. All rights reserved. 1 of 1 12/11/2012 4:44 PM AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit I State of Arizona County of Maricopa ) ) ss. 1 AFFIDAVIT I, the undersigned, being first duly sworn, do hereby state under oath and under penalty of perjury that the facts are true: 1. I am over the age of 18 and am a resident of Arizona. The information contained in this affidavit is based upon my own personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, could testify competently thereto. I am the duly elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, and I have been a law enforcement officer and official, in both state and federal government, for 5 1 years. 2. In August of last year, a group of citizens from the Surprise Arizona Tea Party organization met with me in my office and presented a petition signed by approximately 250 residents of Maricopa County, asking if I would investigate the controversy surrounding President Barrack Obama's birth certificate authenticity and his eligibility to serve as the President of the United States. 3. This group expressed its concern that, up until that point, no law enforcement agency in the country had ever gone on record indicating that they had either looked into this or that they were willing to do so, citing lack of resources and jurisdictional challenges. 4. The Maricopa County Sheriffs Office is in a rather unique position. Under the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes, as the elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, I have the authority to request the aid of the volunteer posse, located in the county, to assist me in the execution of my duties. Having organized a volunteer posse of approximately 3,000 members, I, as the Sheriff of the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office, can authorize an investigation go forward to answer these questions at virtually no expense to the tax payer. 5. The Cold Case posse agreed to undertake the investigation requested by the 250 citizens of Maricopa County. This posse consists of former police officers and attorneys who have worked investigating the controversy surrounding Barack Obama. The investigation mainly focused on the electronic document that was presented as President Obama's long form birth certificate to the American people and to citizens of Maricopa County by the White House on April 27,201 1. 6. The investigation led to a closer examination of the procedures regarding the registration of births at the Hawaii Department of Health and various statements made by Hawaii government officials regarding the Obama birth controversy over the last five years. 7. Upon close examination of the evidence, it is my belief that forgery and fraud was likely committed in key identity documents including President Obama's longform birth certificate, his Selective Service Registration card, and his Social Security number. 8. My investigators and I believe that President Obama's long-form birth certificate is a computer-generated document, was manufactured electronically, and that it did not originate in a paper format, as claimed by the White House. Most importantly, the "registrar's stamp" in the computer generated document released by the White House and posted on the White House website, may have been imported from another unknown source document. The effect of the stamp not being placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws means that there is probable cause that the document is a forgery, and therefore, it cannot be used as a verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Barack Obama's birth. 9. The Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into Barack Obarna's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president is on-going. The on-going nature of the investigation is due to additional information that has come to light since we held the press conference in March, 2012. As soon as that information has been properly verified by the Cold Case Posse, I will release that information to the public. Executed this Ld_ day of June, 20 1 Maricopa County, Arizona. Joseph M. Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff Sworn to and subsc ibed before me this \%?dayof $-lx\e ,2012. AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit J AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit K AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit L WND » Banking giant accused of laundering billions » Print http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/banking-giant-accused-of-laundering-billio... This is WND printer-friendly version of the article which follows. To view this item online, visit http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/banking-giant-accused-of-laundering-billions/ WND EXCLUSIVE Ex-employee in New York has 1,000 pages of customer account records Published: 02/01/2012 at 8:39 PM by JEROME R. CORSI Email | Archive Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "W Birth Certificate?" NEW YORK – A former employee of HSBC in New York has 1,000 pages of customer account records he claims are evidence of an international money-laundering scheme involving hundreds of billions of dollars by the global banking giant, which reportedly is under investigation by a U.S. Senate committee. John Cruz has delivered to WND customer account records he says he pulled from the HSBC computer system before he was fired. Cruz was terminated Feb. 17, 2010, after two years at HSBC for “poor performance,” but he contends he was let go because senior management didn’t want to him to pursue his personal investigation. Asked for comment, HSBC spokesman Rob Sherman issued a statement to WND. “We support efforts to protect the integrity of the financial system, and our commitment to AML (anti-money laundering) includes rigorous internal processes and a close working partnership with regulators and law enforcement,” the statement said. One of the largest banks in the world, London-based HSBC has about 7,500 offices in more than 80 countries and territories in Europe, North and South America, the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East and Africa. In his position as an account relationship manager, Cruz worked in the HSBC southern New York region, which accounts for about 50 percent of HSBC’s North American revenue. He was assigned to work with several branch managers to identify accounts in which HSBC might introduce additional banking services. Cruz told WND he has “firsthand knowledge and proof of how HSBC transferred billions of dollars through accounts linked to companies that did not exist.” “I had poor job performance because the portfolio of HSBC accounts I was given to work ended up being 90 percent fictitious and fraudulent accounts,” he said. “How could I expand HSBC bank relations with fraudulent accounts that were created to be used for illegal money laundering?” Meanwhile, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has begun probing money-laundering activity at HSBC, according to a Reuters report last week, with the intention of scheduling hearings in the spring. Elise Bean, chief legal counsel and majority staff director for the Senate subcommittee, told WND the panel has “no comment” on any possible HSBC investigation. 1 of 3 12/22/2012 6:44 PM WND » Banking giant accused of laundering billions » Print http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/banking-giant-accused-of-laundering-billio... Cruz came to WND with the 1,000 pages of evidence before the committee’s investigation of HSBC was reported. He previously brought his complaint to Jeremy Scileppi, bureau chief of the Suffolk County District Attorney’s office on Long Island. “Scileppi was no more interested in hearing what I had to say than was the HSBC senior bank management,” Cruz said. “I got stonewalled. That’s when I decided to write a book.” Titled “World Banking World Fraud: Using Your Identity,” the book was published Oct. 7, 2011. Scileppi and the Suffolk County District Attorney’s office did not respond to a WND request to confirm Cruz’s claim. Cruz said that in the two years he worked for HSBC, he eventually discovered that money laundering was being carried out not only by branch managers but also by senior officers of the bank, both within the U.S. and internationally. “From what I saw, I came to suspect HSBC had become the Mexican drug cartels’ bank of choice,” he said. The customer account records suggest identity theft was used to capture legitimate Social Security numbers and create bogus retail and commercial bank accounts through which HSBC employees could deposit and withdraw hundreds of millions of dollars on a daily basis, apparently without the knowledge of the identity-theft victims. Cruz said he ultimately was fired after his supervisors made numerous attempts to discourage him from pursuing his personal investigation. “When I began bringing to the attention of my supervisors suspicious activity in accounts that needed to be reported to legal authorities, including the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, I was told to shut up,” he said. His job required him to access the HSBC computer system to find accounts to contact and visit in person. “I was shocked to find accounts through which millions of dollars were being deposited and withdrawn without any apparent business activity being conducted,” he said. “Then when I went to visit the business, I found nothing – shell companies, vacant offices with no furniture, or no such business whatsoever at the address listed on the account records.” Cruz said he never imagined that keeping his job at HSBC would mean turning a blind eye to criminal behavior. “I always thought that if you ran a bank, you would keep away from customers with fake names,” he said. “Instead, what I found at HSBC were thousands of accounts established for phantom businesses that had apparently only thousands of dollars of claimed business each year, but millions of dollars flowing into and out of the accounts every month.” One of Cruz’s first calls on an HSBC customer required a drive east on the Long Island Expressway to visit a small insurance company. But the phone number turned out to be disconnected, and the tax ID number corresponded with another HSBC customer from Yonkers who had recently closed his account with the bank. Another business Cruz visited, near the Brentwood Station on the Long Island Rail Way off Suffolk Avenue, turned out to be an abandoned building that evidently had not been occupied in some time. It had broken windows, and weeds pushed up through the cracked cement in the parking lot. 2 of 3 12/22/2012 6:44 PM WND » Banking giant accused of laundering billions » Print http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/banking-giant-accused-of-laundering-billio... WND has contacted HSBC customers identified in the account records. They appeared to fall into several distinct categories, including former customers of the bank who claim to have closed their accounts and people with no HSBC account history who were independently victims of identity theft related to credit card use. In all cases WND investigated, the Social Security numbers used to open the HSBC accounts were legitimate and connected to the person in whose name the retail or commercial bank account was opened. In most cases, WND found the phone numbers listed with the HSBC accounts to be disconnected or assigned to new users who claimed no knowledge of the accounts. 3 of 3 12/22/2012 6:44 PM AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit M Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE8BA05M20121211 » Print This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, use the Reprints tool at the top of any article or visit: www.reutersreprints.com. 6:15pm EST By Aruna Viswanatha and Brett Wolf (Reuters) - HSBC Holdings Plc agreed to pay a record $1.92 billion in fines to U.S. authorities for allowing itself to be used to launder a river of drug money flowing out of Mexico and other banking lapses. Mexico's Sinaloa cartel and Colombia's Norte del Valle cartel between them laundered $881 million through HSBC and a Mexican unit, the U.S. Justice Department said on Tuesday. In a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department, the bank acknowledged it failed to maintain an effective program against money laundering and failed to conduct basic due diligence on some of its account holders. Under the agreement, which was reported by Reuters last week, the bank agreed to take steps to fix the problems, forfeit $1.256 billion, and retain a compliance monitor. The bank also agreed to pay $665 million in civil penalties to regulators including to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve, and the Treasury Department. "We accept responsibility for our past mistakes. We have said we are profoundly sorry for them, and we do so again. The HSBC of today is a fundamentally different organization from the one that made those mistakes," HSBC Chief Executive Stuart Gulliver said. THE PLACE TO LAUNDER MONEY HSBC's money-laundering lapses in Mexico and elsewhere were cited in an extensive Senate report earlier this year, but the documents filed in court on Tuesday provided new details. Despite the known risks of doing business in Mexico, the bank put the country in its lowest risk category, which excluded $670 billion in transactions from the monitoring systems, according to the documents. Bank officials repeatedly ignored internal warnings that HSBC's monitoring systems were inadequate, the Justice Department said. In 2008, for example, the CEO of HSBC Mexico was told that Mexican law enforcement had a recording of a Mexican drug lord saying that HSBC Mexico was the place to launder money. Mexican traffickers used boxes specifically designed to the dimensions of an HSBC Mexico teller's window to deposit cash on a daily basis. The agreement also described a vastly understaffed compliance department. At times, only one to four employees were responsible for reviewing alerts identifying suspicious wire transactions. When HSBC processed bulk cash, a business it calls Banknotes, only one or two compliance officials oversaw transactions for 500 to 600 customers, the Justice Department said. Compliance was "woefully inadequate," Loretta Lynch, the U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn, said at a press conference. SANCTIONS VIOLATIONS In documents filed in federal court in Brooklyn, the Justice Department also charged the bank with violating sanctions laws by doing business with customers in Iran, Libya, Sudan, Burma and Cuba. HSBC separately reached a settlement with British watchdog the Financial Services Authority. "The HSBC settlement sends a powerful wakeup call to multinational banks about the consequences of disregarding their anti-money laundering obligations," said Senator Carl Levin, who led the Senate inquiry. U.S. and European banks have now agreed to settlements with U.S. regulators totaling some $5 billion in recent years on charges they violated U.S. sanctions and failed to police potentially illicit transactions. No bank or bank executives have been indicted. Instead, prosecutors have used deferred prosecutions, under which criminal charges against a firm are set aside if it agrees to conditions such as paying fines and changing its behavior. "In trying to reach a result that's fair and just and powerful, you also have to look at the collateral consequences," DOJ criminal chief Lanny Breuer said at the Brooklyn press conference. The settlement is the third time in a decade that HSBC has been penalized for lax controls and ordered by U.S. authorities to improve its monitoring of suspicious transactions. Previous directives by regulators to improve oversight came in 2003 and in 2010. 1 of 2 12/11/2012 7:16 PM Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE8BA05M20121211 Last month, HSBC told investors it had set aside $1.5 billion to cover fines or penalties stemming from the inquiry and warned that costs could be significantly higher. Analyst Jim Antos of Mizuho Securities said that while the fine was huge in cash terms, the settlement costs were "trivial" in terms of the company's book value. HSBC shares closed up 0.56 percent at 644.8 pence in London. ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROLS HSBC said it had increased spending on anti-money laundering systems by around nine times between 2009 and 2011, exited business relationships and clawed back bonuses for senior executives. As evidence of its determination to change, it cited the hiring last January of Stuart Levey, a former top U.S. Treasury Department official, as chief legal officer. Under a five-year agreement with the Justice Department, HSBC agreed to have an independent monitor evaluate its progress in improving its compliance. It also said that as part of the overhaul of its controls, it has launched a global review of its "Know Your Customer" files, which will cost an estimated $700 million over five years. The files are designed to ensure that banks do not unwittingly act as conduits for criminal funds. HSBC's settlement comes a day after rival British bank Standard Chartered Plc agreed to a $327 million settlement with U.S. law enforcement agencies for sanctions violations, a pact that follows a $340 million settlement the bank reached with the New York bank regulator in August. Such settlements have become commonplace. In what had been the largest settlement until this week, ING Bank NV in June agreed to pay $619 million to settle U.S. government allegations that it violated sanctions against countries including Cuba and Iran. In the United States, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co, Wachovia Corp and Citigroup Inc have been cited for anti-money laundering lapses or sanctions violations. HSBC's failings date to 2003, when the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and New York state regulators ordered it to better monitor suspicious money flows. In 2010, a consent order from the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) ordered HSBC to review suspicious transactions. At the time, the OCC called HSBC's compliance program "ineffective." In 2008, the federal prosecutor in Wheeling, West Virginia, began investigating allegations that a local doctor used the bank to launder money from Medicare fraud. Ultimately, the prosecutor's office came to believe the case was "the tip of the iceberg" in terms of suspicious transactions conducted through HSBC, according to documents reviewed by Reuters and reported earlier this year. (Additional reporting by Lawrence White and Michael Flaherty in Hong Kong, Steve Slater in London, Jessica Dye in Brooklyn; Editing by Peter Graff, John Wallace and Alden Bentley) © Thomson Reuters 2011. All rights reserved. Users may download and print extracts of content from this website for their own personal and non-commercial use only. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters and its logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of the Thomson Reuters group of companies around the world. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests. This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, use the Reprints tool at the top of any article or visit: www.reutersreprints.com. 2 of 2 12/11/2012 7:16 PM AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit N Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targ... http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-a... SEARCH Latest News View All The Trading Deck December 11, 2012 New York After London Closed Tokyo Open 7:29 PM EST DOW +78.56 NASDAQ +35.34 S&P 500 13,248.44 +0.60% 3,022.30 +1.18% 1,427.84 +9.29 +0.65% 1 of 3 12/11/2012 7:30 PM Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targ... http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-a... 2 of 3 12/11/2012 7:30 PM Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targ... http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-a... Copyright © 2012 MarketWatch, Inc. All rights reserved. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy - UPDATED 10/18/2011. Intraday Data provided by SIX Financial Information and subject to terms of use. Historical and current end-of-day data provided by SIX Financial Information. Intraday data delayed per exchange requirements. S&P/Dow Jones Indices (SM) from Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All quotes are in local exchange time. Real time last sale data provided by NASDAQ. More information on NASDAQ traded symbols and their current financial status. Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges. S&P/Dow Jones Indices (SM) from Dow Jones & Company, Inc. SEHK intraday data is provided by SIX Financial Information and is at least 60-minutes delayed. All quotes are in local exchange time. 3 of 3 12/11/2012 7:30 PM AFFIDAVIT In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Exhibit O http://1461days.blogspot.com/2009/01/current-list-of-presidentobamas.html#.UNtjg6D6rRQ Current List of President Obama's Executive Orders Posted by 1461 Days For ease of navigating the full list, the most recent orders are listed below here on the main page along with the rest of the Executive Orders. You can also view the list broken out by year by clicking on the following links: (Scroll down for the 2012 Executive Orders) President Obama's Executive Orders issued in 2011 President Obama's Executive Orders issued in 2010 President Obama's Executive Orders issued in 2009 Learn more about the Constitutional right to use the Presidential Executive Order and what other Presidents have written Executive Orders and how they have used the Power of the Executive Order by clicking here. Some of you have asked about former President George W Bush's Executive Orders. I am assembling the EO list for President George W Bush now. You can view and download the Executive Orders from the first years of the George W Bush Administration here. Executive Orders become law if unchallenged by the Congress 30 days after they are submitted. They must also be published in the Federal Register. The Listing of Executive orders in the Congressional Library runs in a numeric order starting with the first Executive orders passed until the most current. When President Barack Obama took office his EO list started from #EO-13489 Do you know which President issued the most Executive Orders? Click here to find out who. Updates and edits to this page are made as soon as new Executive orders are released and published to the Internet for review. 1461 Days of Executive Power - the book will be available soon. You can request your copy by sending an email to 1461Days@Gmail.com Currently we have nearly 1,000 copies on request! Sales are not open yet, please do not send money for the book. Each item below has a link to the Executive Order or a PDF of the signed document for your review as they are made available. All links open in a new window. The List of President Obama's Executive Orders runs in descending order from the most recent. December 21, 2012 Executive Order: Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies of the Federal Government Executive Order: Reestablishment of Advisory Commission This list is complete and current to December 21, 2012 President Obama has signed 146 Executive Orders to date during his Administration. The 1461 has included a Free Download of the Official Executive Orders as they become available in the Federal Registry. The list was originally started here on the 1461 on January 25 2009. I get emails from time to time asking why other blogs and websites list President Obama's Executive Orders in the hundreds even thousands and I show only the true count of the current number of Executive Orders. The answer is simple - We don't need to lie or embellish the total number of Executive Orders the Truth will Set you Free. Read my open response to the emails questioning the Executive Order count here. Page 1 of 22 Page 2 of 22 December 7, 2012 Executive Order: Establishing the Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force July 31, 2012 Executive Order 13622: Authorizing Additional Sanctions With Respect To Iran July 26, 2012 Executive Order: Reestablishment of Advisory Group December 6, 2012 Executive Order 13621: White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans July 20, 2012 Executive Order: Establishment of an Interagency Task Force on Commercial Advocacy October 26, 2012 Executive Order13629: Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council October 9, 2012 Executive Order 13628: Authorizing the Implementation of Certain Sanctions Set Forth in the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 and Additional Sanctions with respect to Iran September 25, 2012 Executive Order 13627: Strengthening Protections Against Trafficking In Persons In Federal Contracts September 10, 2012 June 14, 2012 Executive Order 13626: Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Executive Order 13616: Accelerating Broadband Infrastructure Deployment August 31, 2012 Executive Order 13625: Improving Access to Mental Health Services for Veterans, Service Members, and Military Families August 30, 2012 Executive Order 13624: Accelerating Investment in Industrial Energy Efficiency Executive Order 13613: Providing an Order of Succession within the Department of Commerce August 10, 2012 Executive Order 13612: Providing an Order of Succession within the Department of Agriculture Executive Order 13623: Preventing and Responding to Violence Against Women and Girls Globally May 16, 2012 May 21, 2012 Executive Order 13615: Providing an Order of Succession within the Office of Management and Budget Executive Order 13614: Providing an Order of Succession within the Environmental Protection Agency Executive Order 13620: Taking Additional Steps to Address the National Emergency with Respect to Somalia July 11, 2012 Executive Order 13619: Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Burma July 6, 2012 Executive Order 13618: Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions June 25, 2012 Executive Order 13617: Russian Highly Enriched Uranium Page 3 of 22 Page 4 of 22 Executive Order: Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen May 10, 2012 Executive Order - Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens May 1 2012 Executive Order - Prohibiting Certain Transactions with and Suspending Entry into the United States of Foreign Sanctions Evaders with Respect to Iran and Syria Executive Order - Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation February 28, 2012 Executive Order - Establishment of the Interagency Trade Enforcement Center February 9, 2012 Executive Order - Establishing the President's Global Development Council February 6, 2012 Executive Order - Blocking Property of the Government of Iran and Iranian Financial Institutions January 27, 2012 Executive Order 13598 - Assignment of Functions Relating to Certain Promotion and Appointment Actions in the Armed Forces January 19, 2012 Executive Order 13597 - Establishing Visa and Foreign Visitor Processing Goals and the Task Force on Travel and Competitiveness December 19, 2011 April 27, 2012 Executive Order - Establishing Principles of Excellence for Educational Institutions Serving Service Members, Veterans, Spouses, and Other Family Members April 23, 2012 Executive Order - Blocking the Property and Suspending Entry into the United States of Certain Persons with Respect to Grave Human Rights Abuses by the Governments of Iran and Syria via Information Technology April 13, 2012 Executive Order 13596 - Amendments to Executive Orders 12131 and 13539 Executive Order - Supporting Safe and Responsible Development of Unconventional Domestic Natural Gas Resources Executive Order 13594 - Instituting a National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security March 22, 2012 Executive Order - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects March 16, 2012 December 13, 2011 Executive Order - Improving Performance of Federal Permitting and Review of Infrastructure Projects Executive Order - National Defense Resources Preparedness December 2, 2011 March 15, 2012 Executive Order - Establishing a White House Council on Strong Cities, Strong Communities Executive Order 13592 - Improving American Indian and Alaska Native Educational Opportunities and Strengthening Tribal Colleges and Universities Executive Order 13593 - 2011 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States Executive Order 13595 - Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay Page 5 of 22 Page 6 of 22 November 23, 2011 Executive Order 13591 - Continuance of Certain Federal Advisory Committees July 25, 2011 Executive Order 13581 - Blocking Property of Transnational Criminal Organizations November 21, 2011 Executive Order 13590 - Iran Sanctions July 12, 2011 Executive Order 13580 - Inter-agency Working Group on Coordination of Domestic Energy Development and Permitting in Alaska November 9, 2011 July 11, 2011 Executive Order 13589 - Promoting Efficient Spending Executive Order 13579 - Regulation and Independent Regulatory Agencies October 31, 2011 July 6, 2011 Executive Order 13588 - Reducing Prescription Drug Shortages Executive Order 13578 - Coordinating Policies on Automotive Communities and Workers October 7, 2011 Executive Order 13587 - Structural Reforms to Improve the Security of Classified Networks and the Responsible Sharing and Safeguarding of Classified Information October 6, 2011 June 13, 2011 Executive Order 13586 - Emergency Board to Investigate Disputes Between Certain Railroads Executive Order 13576 - Delivering an Efficient, Effective, and Accountable Government September 30, 2011 June 9, 2011 Executive Order 13585 - Continuance of Certain Federal Advisory Committees Executive Order 13575: Establishment of the White House Rural Council September 9, 2011 Executive Order 13584 - Developing an Integrated Strategic Counterterrorism Communications Initiative May 23, 2011 Executive Order 13574: AUTHORIZING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN SANCTIONS SET FORTH IN THE IRAN SANCTIONS ACT OF 1996, AS AMENDED August 18, 2011 Executive Order 13583 - Establishing a Coordinated Government-wide Initiative to Promote Diversity and Inclusion in the Federal Workforce Executive Order 13582 - Blocking Property of the Government of Syria and Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to Syria May 18, 2011 Executive Order 13573: Blocking Property of Senior Officials of the Government of Syria June 15, 2011 Executive Order 13577 - Select USA Initiative Page 7 of 22 Page 8 of 22 April 29, 2011 Executive Order 13572: Blocking Property of Certain Persons with Respect to Human Rights Abuses in Syria January 18, 2011 Executive Order 13563 Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review December 27, 2010 April 27, 2011 Executive Order 13562 Recruiting and Hiring Students and Recent Graduates Executive Order 13571: Streamlining Service Delivery and Improving Customer Service December 22, 2010 April 18, 2011 Executive Order 13561 Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay Executive Order 13570: Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to North Korea December 14, 2010 April 5, 2011 Executive Order 13560 White House Council for Community Solutions Executive Order 13569: Amendments to Executive Orders 12824, 12835, 12859, and 13532, Reestablishment Pursuant to Executive Order 13498, and Revocation of Executive Order 13507 November 17, 2010 March 8, 2011 Executive Order 13568: Extending Provisions of the International Organization Immunities Act March 7, 2011 November 9, 2010 Executive Order 13567: Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force Executive Order 13558 Export Coordination Enforcement Center Executive Order 13559 Fundamental Principles and Policy-making Criteria for Partnerships with Faith-Based and Other Neighborhood Organizations February 25, 2011 Executive Order 13566: BLOCKING PROPERTY AND PROHIBITING CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS RELATED TO LIBYA November 4, 2010 Executive Order 13557 Controlled Unclassified Information Executive Order 13556 Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice February 8, 2011 Executive Order 13565: Establishment of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Advisory Committees October 19, 2010 Executive Order 13555 White House Initiative On Educational Excellence For Hispanics January 31, 2011 Executive Order 13564: Establishment of the President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness October 5, 2010 Executive Order 13554 Establishing the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Task Force Page 9 of 22 Page 10 of 22 September 29, 2010 Executive Order 13553 Designating Iranian Officials Responsible for or Complicit in Serious Human Rights Abuses June 10, 2010 Executive Order 13544: Establishing the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council August 31, 2010 Executive Order 13552 2010 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial May 22, 2010 Executive Order 13543: Establishing the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling August 30, 2010 May 13, 2010 Executive Order 13551 Blocking Property of Certain Persons with Respect to North Korea Executive Order 13542: Establishing an Order of Succession Within the Department of Agriculture August 18, 2010 Executive Order 13550 Establishment of Pakistan and Afghanistan Support Office May 10, 2010 Executive Order 13541 - Temporary Organization to Facilitate a Strategic Partnership with the Republic of Iraq This Executive Order establishes a temporary organization to be known as the Iraq Strategic Partnership Office within the Department of State, in accordance with section 3161 of title 5 of United States Code. The organization main directive is to support executive departments and agencies in transitioning to a strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq in economic, diplomatic, cultural, and security fields based on the Strategic Framework Agreement. Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Establishing the Temporary Organization to Facilitate a Strategic Partnership with the Republic of Iraq Executive Order 13549 Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Entities July 26, 2010 Executive Order 13548 Increasing Federal Employment of Individuals With Disabilities July 19, 2010 Executive Order 13547 Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes July 2, 2010 April 26, 2010 Executive Order 13546 Optimizing the Security of Biological Select Agents and Toxins in the United States Executive Order 13540 - Inter-agency Task Force on Veterans Small Business Development This Executive Order calls for the establishment of a inter-agency task force within the Small Business Administration to promote Veterans Small Business Development initiatives. The task force will be made up of eleven members with four of those members being representatives from a veterans' service or military organization or association, who shall be appointed by the Administrator. June 23, 2010 Executive Order 13545 the President's Council on Fitness, Sports, and Nutrition Page 11 of 22 Page 12 of 22 April 13, 2010 Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Establishing the Inter-agency Task Force on Veterans Small Business Development April 21, 2010 Executive Order 13539 - President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology This Executive Order establishes a 21 member advisory council on science, technology, and innovation that will report to the President. One member of the PCAST will be the the Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and will be designated as the Science Advisor. The remaining 20 members will be made up of individuals and representatives from sectors outside of the Federal Government appointed by the President. Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Establishing the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology This executive order invokes the use of previously established laws and international guidelines to block and remove available monetary influence of certain individuals in Somalia. The executive order is comprised of 9 sections. To review the executive order in full use the link at the bottom of this section. Section one of the executive order states that All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person, including any overseas branch, of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: (i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order; and (ii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State: to have engaged in acts that directly or indirectly threaten the peace, security, or stability of Somalia. Review the Executive Order Annex by clicking on the following link: Annex to the Executive Order Regarding Persons with Direct Interest in Somalia Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Regarding Somalia March 24, 2010 Executive Order 13535 - Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Consistency with Longstanding Restrictions on the Use of Federal Funds for Abortion This executive order establishes an adequate enforcement mechanism to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services, except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered, consistent with a longstanding Federal statutory restriction that is commonly known as the Hyde Amendment. The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly created health insurance exchanges. Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. 300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, section 508(d)(1) of Public Law 111-8) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions. Executive Order 13536 - Regarding Blocking Properties of Persons Tied to the Conflict in Somalia April 19, 2010 Executive Order 13538 - Establishing the President's Management Advisory Board This Executive Order establishes within the General Services Administration (GSA) the President's Management Advisory Board (PMAB). The PMAB will provide the President and the President's Management Council advice and recommendations on effective strategies for the implementation of best business practices on matters related to Federal Government management and operation, with a particular focus on productivity, the application of technology, and customer service. The PMAB shall be advisory in function only. Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Establishing the President's Management Advisory Board April 14, 2010 Executive Order 13537 - Inter-agency Group on Insular Areas This Executive Order establishes the Inter-agency Group on Insular Areas (IGIA) to address policies concerning Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (Insular Areas). This group will be formed within the Department of the Interior for administrative purposes. Review the Executive Order by clicking on the following link: Executive Order Creating the Inter-agency Group on Insular Areas Page 13 of 22 Page 14 of 22 The Act establishes a new Community Health Center (CHC) Fund within HHS, which provides additional Federal funds for the community health center program. Review the EO by clicking on the following link: Restrictions on the Use of Federal Funds for Abortion Universities. The department to be formed by this EO will be housed in the Department of Education. The initiative shall work with other executive departments, agencies, and offices, the private sector, educational associations, philanthropic organizations, and other partners to increase the capacity of HBCUs ("historically black colleges and universities" shall mean those institutions listed in 34 C.F.R. 602.8) to provide the highest-quality education to a greater number of students, and to take advantage of these institutions' capabilities in serving the Nation's needs through five core tasks. Executive Order 13256 of February 12, 2002, as enacted by former President George W. Bush is revoked by mandate of this EO. EO 13256 revoked Executive Order 12876 of November 1, 1993 enacted by former President Bill Clinton. Review the EO by clicking on the following link: Executive Order creating HBCU Initiative. February 18, 2010 the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility & Reform. Executive order to form a bipartisan "fiscal responsibility commission" that will act as a think tank and advise the President and administration on ways to cut the deficit. The Commission shall be composed of 18 members, 6 members are appointed by the President, no more than 4 of whom shall be from the same political party, 3 members are to be selected by the Majority Leader of the Senate from current Senate members, 3 members are to be selected by the Speaker of the House of Representatives from current House members, 3 members selected by the Minority Leader of the Senate from current Senate members and 3 members selected by the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives from current House members. Review the EO by clicking on the following link: Executive Order creating the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility & Reform. January 17, 2010 Executive Order calling Selected Reserve and Certain Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty The Executive Order allows the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security to add personal in support of targeted functions associated with the humanitarian relief effort in Haiti. For instance, it will allow the activation of reserve medical personnel to replace those deployed on the hospital ship Comfort and allow for the deployment of a Coast Guard unit that will help provide port security. See the full executive order as well as a PDF of the EO by clicking the following link: Executive Order Ordering the Selected Reserve and Certain Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty March 11, 2010 Executive Order - National Export Initiative The National Export Initiative (NEI) shall be an Administration initiative to improve conditions that directly affect the private sector's ability to export. The NEI will help meet my Administration's goal of doubling exports over the next 5 years by working to remove trade barriers abroad, by helping firms -- especially small businesses -- overcome the hurdles to entering new export markets, by assisting with financing, and in general by pursuing a Government-wide approach to export advocacy abroad, among other steps. This EO also creates an NEI Cabinet to be known as the Export Promotion Cabinet. The Export Promotion Cabinet shall meet periodically and report to the President on the progress of the NEI. Review the EO by clicking on the following link: National Export Initiative March 1, 2010 Executive Order establishing an Order of Succession within the Department of Defense Department of Defense, in the EO's listed order shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of the Secretary of Defense during any period in which the Secretary has died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of the Secretary, until such time as the Secretary is able to perform the functions and duties of that office. This EO revokes Executive Order 13394 of December 22, 2005 (Providing An Order of Succession Within the Department of Defense - enacted by former President George W. Bush), is hereby revoked. Review the EO by clicking on the following link: Order of Succession within the Department of Defense February 26, 2010 Promoting Excellence, Innovation, and Sustainability at Historically Black Colleges and Universities Executive order to establish a White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Page 15 of 22 Page 16 of 22 January 11, 2010 Executive Order Establishing Council of Governors See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Classified National Security Information December 23, 2009 An Executive Order establishing a Council of Governors to strengthen further the partnership between the Federal Government and State Governments to protect our Nation against all types of hazards. When appointed, the Council will be reviewing such matters as involving the National Guard of the various States; homeland defense; civil support; synchronization and integration of State and Federal military activities in the United States; and other matters of mutual interest pertaining to National Guard, homeland defense, and civil support activities. See the full executive order as well as a PDF of the EO by clicking the following link: Executive Order Establishing Council of Governors December 30, 2009 Executive Order: Medical Countermeasures Following a Biological Attack Establishing Federal capability for the timely provision of medical countermeasures following a biological attack. See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Medical Countermeasures Following a Biological Attack December 29, 2009 Executive Order - Original Classification Authority Executive Order -- Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay Modifications to Government pay scales. See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay December 17, 2009 Executive Order -- Amending Executive Order 12425 International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by The Original EO by Ronald Reagan: EO 12425 The original EO was amended once before by : EO 12971 on September 15, 1995 See the full executive order by clicking the following link: EO 13524 Amending Executive Order 12425 December 11, 2009 Designating the Authority to place Classifications See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Original Classification Authority December 29, 2009 Executive Order - Classified National Security Information This order prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism. Our democratic principles require that the American people be informed of the activities of their Government. Also, our Nation's progress depends on the free flow of information both within the Government and to the American people. Nevertheless, throughout our history, the national defense has required that certain information be maintained in confidence in order to protect our citizens, our democratic institutions, our homeland security, and our interactions with foreign nations. Protecting information critical to our Nation's security and demonstrating our commitment to open Government through accurate and accountable application of classification standards and routine, secure, and effective declassification are equally important priorities. Executive Order: Half-Day Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies on Thursday, December 24, 2009 All executive branch departments and agencies of the Federal Government shall be closed and their employees excused from duty for the last half of the scheduled workday on Thursday, December 24, 2009, the day before Christmas Day, except as provided in section 2 of this order. See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Half-Day Closing December 09, 2009 Executive Order: Creating Labor-Management Forums To Improve Delivery of Government Services The Council shall advise the President on matters involving labor-management relations in the executive branch. Page 17 of 22 Page 18 of 22 See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Labor-Management Forums November 23, 2009 Executive Order-- Reducing Improper Payments and Eliminating Waste in Federal Programs The purpose of this order is to reduce improper payments by intensifying efforts to eliminate payment error, waste, fraud, and abuse in the major programs administered by the Federal Government, while continuing to ensure that Federal programs serve and provide access to their intended beneficiaries. See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Reducing Improper Payments November 17, 2009 Executive Order - Establishment of the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force This EO is to establish an interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force (Task Force) led by the Department of Justice. The Task Force shall be chaired by the Attorney General. See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force November 09, 2009 Executive Order - Veterans Employment Initiative This Executive order calls for the Employment of Veterans in the Federal Government. See the full executive order by clicking the following link: Veterans Employment Initiative October 30, 2009 Amendments to Executive Orders 13183 and 13494. See the current full executive order by clicking the following link: Executive order to Amend Executive Orders 13183 and 13494 October 29, 2009 Order to Amend Executive Order 13462 An amendment to the privious executive order # 13462 signed on February 29, 2008 by then President George W. Bush Click on the link to view the original executive order 13462 See the current full executive order by clicking the following link: Executive order to Amend Executive Order 13462 October 14, 2009 INCREASING PARTICIPATION OF ASIAN AMERICANS AND PACIFIC ISLANDERS IN FEDERAL PROGRAMS The purpose of this order is to establish an Advisory Commission on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and a White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Each will work to improve the quality of life and opportunities for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders through increased access to, and participation in, Federal programs in which they may be underserved. In addition, each will work to advance relevant evidence-based research, data collection, and analysis for AAPI populations and subpopulations. See the full 5 page executive order by clicking the following link: Executive order for Increasing Participation of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Federal Programs October 05, 2009 Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance This executive order sets sustainability goals for Federal agencies and focuses on making improvements in their environmental, energy and economic performance. The Executive Order requires Federal agencies to set a 2020 greenhouse gas emissions reduction target within 90 days; increase energy efficiency; reduce fleet petroleum consumption; conserve water; reduce waste; support sustainable communities; and leverage Federal purchasing power to promote environmentally-responsible products and technologies. See the full 15 page executive order by clicking the following link: Executive order for the Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance October 1, 2009 Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging while Driving Section two of this executive order states "Text Messaging While Driving by Federal Employees. Federal employees shall not engage in text messaging (a) when driving GOV, or when driving POV while on official Government business, or (b) when using electronic equipment supplied by the Government while driving." Page 19 of 22 Page 20 of 22 The order is to go into effect 90 days from date of issue according to section 4. See the full executive order including sections 1 thru 7 here by clicking the following link: Executive order for the Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging while Driving September 29, 2009 The Continuance of Certain Advisory Committees Per Section 1 of this Executive Order the following advisory committees are to be continued until September 30, 2011. (a) Committee for the Preservation of the White House (b) National Infrastructure Advisory Council (c) Federal Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health (d) President's Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (e) President's Board of Advisors on Tribal Colleges and Universities (f) President's Commission on White House Fellowships (g) President's Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities (h) President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities (i) President's Committee on the International Labor Organization (j) President's Committee on the National Medal of Science (k) President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports (l) President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (m) President's Export Council (n) President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (o) Trade and Environment Policy Advisory Committee See the full executive order including sections 2, 3 and 4 here by clicking the following link: Executive order for the Continuance of Certain Federal Advisory Committees June 23, 2009 Establishment of a White House Council on automotive communities and workers May 12, 2009 Executive Order Chesapeake Bay Protection and Restoration April 8, 2009 Executive Order Establishing The White House Office Of Health Reform March 11, 2009 Executive Order Creating the White House Council on Women and Girls February 19, 2009 Executive Order: Establishment of the White House Office of Urban Affairs February 6, 2009 Presidential Executive Order Establishing the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board USE OF PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS FOR FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS February 5, 2009 Executive Order - Further Amendments To Executive Order 12859, Establishment Of The Domestic Policy Council Executive Order: Further Amendments to Executive Order 12835, Establishment of the National Economic Council Amendments to Executive Order 13199 and Establishment of the President's Advisory Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships January 30, 2009 Executive Order 13497: Revocation Of Certain Executive Orders Concerning Regulatory Planning And Review Executive Order 13496: Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws Executive Order 13495: Non-displacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts Executive Order 13494: Economy in Government Contracting January 22, 2009 Executive Order 13493: Review of Detention Policy Options Executive Order 13492: Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and Close of Detention Facilities Executive Order 13491: Ensuring Lawful Interrogations March 9, 2009 January 21, 2009 Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving Human Stem Cells February 20, 2009 Amending Executive Order 13390 EO 13490: Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel EO 13489: Presidential Records Page 21 of 22 Page 22 of 22 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-2866 Phone: 202-216-70001 Facsimile: 202-279-8530 PIease tlms stamp below. AFTER-HOURS DEPOSITORY Please compfetethe followfng infomation, dafeltime stamp this form and affix to each package. Case Number Contents: r Briefs r AppendicesJRecord Material Motions Other (Please identify) Mandamus Petition Original Proceeding Ngte; - Emergency matters andlor sealed materials may not be placed In the filings depository. USCA Form 1 AUGUST 2009 (REVISED) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-2866 Phone: 202-216-7000 1 Facsimile: 202-219-8530 --. I r - + . y' N , , : , L- :-, m - <': '0 ,? J -' (' 4 -.. " - 1 i- & CIVIL DOCKETING STATEMENT AN Cases Qther than Administrative Agency Cases (Tobe completed by appellant) ---. W .' ' I 2 . DATE DOCKETED: 2-31-2& 3. CASE NAME (lead parties only)l N RE CE STRUNK PETITION v. Respondents see lrst 4, WPE OF CASE: 5. 1, CASE NO. If YES, cite statute FRAP Rule 21ion matter of Januaw 20,2013 oath ofoffice of POTUS 6, CASE INFORMATION: Bankruptcy Court Docket No. a. District Court Docket No. Tax Court Docket No. Civil Action Banksuptcy Tax Criminal Adversary Miscellaneous Electoral colleae Ancillary b. Review is sought of: Interlocutory Order certified for appeal r Final Order r Interlocutory Order appealable as of right c. Name of judge who entered order being appealed: Judge Magistrate Judge e. Date notice of appeal filed: d. Date of order($) appealed (use date docketed): r District Ct - r US Civil Private Civil fC;rjminal r Bankruptcy r Bankruptcy - if direct from Bankruptcy Court K Original proceeding IS THIS CASE REQUIRED BY STATUTE TO BE EXPEDITED? G Yes r No r No ~fYES, date filed: 12-31-2012 g. Are any motions currently pending in trial court? I;: Yes r No If YES, date filed: 12-21-2012 If YES, identify motion Motion to Dismiss w sanctions in a NYS SC Kings Petition w Index no.: 21948-2012 Yes G No h. Has a transcript of proceedings been ordered pursuant to FRAP 1O(b)? If NO, why not? There has not been a hearing, only an order declining to sign OSC for hearing schedule i. Has this case been before the Court under another appeal number? ( ; : Yes Appeal # G No j. Are any cases involving the same underlying order or, to counsel's knowledge, involving substantially the same issue, currently pending before the District Court, this Court, another Circuit Court, or the Supreme Courl? 6 Yes f No If YES. sive each case's court and case name, and docket number: NYS SC Kings County petlion with Index 21948-12, USDC DCD 10-00486 (RCL) k. Does this case turn on validity or correct interpretation or application of a statute? @ Yes No If YES, give popular name and citation of statute 18 USC 2381 to 2390; WSC A2SIC2, A2SlC5, 14th B17th Am$ 7.Have the parties attempted to resolve issues in this case through arbitration, mediation, or another alternative for dispute resolution? Yes F No If so, provide program name and participation dates f. Has any other notice of appeal been filed in this case? li Yes r r r r Signature Name of Party Name of Counsel for AppellanVPetitioner Address Date Phone (- ) Fax AlTACH k CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Note: If counsel for any other party believes that the information svbrnitted is inaccurate or incomplete, counser may so advise the Clerk within 7 calendar days by letter, Mth oopies to all other parties, specifiwlly referring to the challenged statement. Attach a certificate of service to this form. I -1 USAC Form 42 August 2009 (REVISED) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 333 Constitution Avenue. NW Washington, DC 20001-2866 Phone: 202-21 6-7000 1 Facsimile: 202-219-8530 Case Caption: In RE Christopher Earl Strunk & Case Number: Petitioner v. See attached list Respondent PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN AGENCY, BOARD, COMMISSION, OR OFFICER Notice is hereby given this the 28 day of December 20 -that petioner(s) entered n RE Christopher Earl Strunk - hereby petitions the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of the order of the tespondent(s) See attached list the 70 dayof&Ew&3L 2 0) 5 5 Attorney for Petitioner(s)/Pro Se Party, Christopher Earl Strunk 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Telephone: ( 845 ) 901-6767 USCA Form 12 AUGUST 2009 (Revised) PETITIONER Christopher-Earl: Strunk Q i n esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, New York 1 1238 CelI-845-90 1-6767; chrls2strun k.ws RESPONDENTS The Honorable Irvin B. Nathan Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia 44 1 4th Street, NW Joseph Robinette Biden, Js. President of the U.S.Senate c / o the White House I600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 2QOQ 1 Washington, DC 20500; Barack Obarna c / o the White Mouse 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500; Andrew Cuorno Governor of New York State The Honorable Karen L. Haas Clark of the W.S. House of Representatives U S ,Capitol, Room H154, Washington, DC 205 15-660 I John A. Boehner Speaker of the U.S. House of Repre sen tatives 1 011 Longworth M.O.B. Washington, DC 20515 Senator Mi tch McConnell United States Senate 3 17 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C.205 101702 Senator Marry Reid United States Senate 522 H a r t Senate Ofice Buitding Washington, D.C. 205 10-2803 The New York State Capitol Albany, New York 12224 Hon. David I. Schmidt J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S, Part 1 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings I.A.S. Part 27. 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11207 Senator Charles E.Schumer United States Senate 322 H a r t Senate Office Building Washington, D.C.205 10-320 1 Senator Kirsten GilIibrand United States Senate Washington, D.C. Ofice: 478 Russell Senate Office Building, District of Columbia 205 10-3204 Steven C.Farkas, Esq. of COLLERAN, O'HARA & MILLS, L.L.P, Representing Mario Cilento 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 450 Garden City, New York 11530 Joshua Pepper NYS Assist. A.G. Office of the W S Attorney General 120 Broadway 24" Floor New Yotk, New York 101 71 I In re Christnpher-Earl: Strunk t In csrc a private US. Cjtiren m u d baefldw P m O S FORAWUT OF MAiDMLS STATE OFNEWYORK 1 ) ss. ATF1DAWT OF SERVICE COUNTY OF KINGS 1 Accordingly*1, -ROYHEEN HALL,being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of Am over 18 years of age and not a perty tn this actioll. b . My plan of k~siness 1s located at 655 PARK 1 1206. c. On 3ECEMBEX 28 2012, Christophrr Smr-k invrructed to senT a ' m e mnromed copy 02 t!e FamQN W C E FOR THE In re Chriatapher-Earl: Stfunk Q i n csse a pfivate U . S . Citizen secured beneficiary PBTTTlOIY FOR A WRIT OF M i W D m S WITH PETITIONER'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT WITFf EXHTBITS ANTEXED A F P I K ! DECEMBER 26, 201 2 with each FILmG NOTICE stdcc! in a properly a.3c~ssed emelope :o tach res?on',enr 1n:ed bclcru !or d e I k e by ~ LISPS re&!ar mail. d. On DECEMBER 28,20 12.1 wcsed each copy x i & proper Posta~e ffr setJice -3yr ~ r 5 : class meil on the listed Electors and where each envelope was pmper:y ~ddrcsscd ~5r32 tSle h'oiificatiar. 'U3GEYT L2O.G 3ERlT1CZ"and " PERSOYAL 8 CONFTDE?mALa L-I the !owr !eft h a ~ d comer of the zenve!op *..at was th~:: deposited nSth the USPS b r stn.lct npon: a. Omct RTAItmy M t + i Altmney 5 M $ c Sired. Rw3431.Albany. NY I207 1. P. DBvid 1 . R0MT.ksm~TheOffmoflbcBmC0~~~Rn~l4lt~1~SfEsr16~~l5trrctB~~.SYIW51 3. F m n l . A . k d i k I t l ~ c C o ~ D i ~ ~ ~ C s O f f i c c L ~ k l ? ~ i r ~ : A v ~ ~ r S u ~ ~ l ~ , N ~ Y n r k I ~ 2 D ~ 4. Charkr J. H w kin^ Cnlmly bstricr Altancy3 PjEcc 3 0 Jay 5*b Bmklvr.. Yrw York NY 11201 Smdra m l t y Warme Corny Emkt A!lomc\'r OF=. t7 Scu'h F v b @ Sm: Xwiiccttr, PIY 1.46 14 5. 6. 7. 8. Q. 10. 11. 12. IS. 14. I T6. 17, Lnrhlm U, b c e OficeoiYasrm Colnry Dim+ Arturnq 262 OI~CFL%Tl a d h1inml.a. h'Y 1 150 1 R Vmce, Jr 'Ihc X w Yurk Cwmy B m Am-#* Ofiw Dnc E w P l ~ Ye% c Y ~ r k NY . I00I3 U'illram I. F~hptrick O n e C m ~ DA's y OKcc CnmhF CW suird~ns -*:IT Fltrr 505 b u t 3 S ~ r SVRT c Sp:me, NV 112112 Fmnciq D .Phrllip~ OPRct of rhc O m q e m r y D i dA m WMarzhnvs Stroer Gwhm N?' LOX4 Rrchard A. Brown Q ~ e t m C o whsmct i~ .4tu*rrcy'r O n e 13M1 Cwcm h l c \ j r r l KnvGcrdens. F ; mYo:k Z Irl5 fholn~s J, Spra SuKnk&ty llisha ~ n r w ' OlFice l Kcwth Cnonry ~vITt$cx hiklinp 77 V e r m Irlmnrh! Hiphwr). bppaugc.NY 1 1789 Gtum \Vilkln~rm OFim ottomlrins Chmy D i a r i a Attorry 320 Nnrlh T i ~ Smrt a I h a . K w Ycrk 1 4 V 3 Kwm C,Kor~ripTvO T m Or7he u &iqm County Udria A m m q Municml Cm~n & M i * C - 3113 Rr&y Fm Edwvd. N w Yark 12628 J a m DiFrore O i i s c ~ T U ' c a c h m a Distnc~ A m m y 1 I I [k. Msnin Lvrhn Ym& IT. 014 ~ ~ X PI lo Ch %ns Ibrk 10501 Jod~uhuaPcpptrvY$ Aks~qarn Armmcy Ccnaal 0Two~Arimnc). C M ~ t2fl &wrlwy kY SY 181.71 Andrm M.C b o m 13%E@c S : m AThny. KY ln2 GcAd D.Jmning d 1 i ?! Sew % ~ l a r r dRend - Alhw)'. NY 1 1 X 8 QTUS - - IS. G~cG~ham:313F~n;3frdS~fi-Rmar~Y10.166 J 9. R U ~ D:ar I I . .OF $20 Bc?ra A crnne. * I 3 - ~ R Xh . Y 104'13 2 0 . B y m Bmm 1 4 Blzlnc Sired RuITalv, h ? ' 1 4 M R 21. FcIlv m i x IS9 8 5.W Smcr B m ~ k l m NY 111232 T. H a k m J ~ a 3 5 U n d e r h 1 l l A 1 ~ ~ . u c , s 2 A - B r n o ~ f il. l N 3Y$ 23. B:ll IkB1ss:o o f M 2 1 I th SM-Bmokly~.NY 1 2 1 4 24. Rohc17 Do!? 164Croydun Road-Rmbm~cr.KY 18610 ?. Iortlph M o ~ l l o e f 132 W ~ c l Drirt d R x M t r , S.Y 14K9 26 Turn DiNapli I M G m t Nmk ?cad -- Gra[ Z ' K ~UV 1 1f01 17, Frickhneidmen645 WntE!ndfi.\~me.*SF-NmY~lfk.~~r325 28. A'nltcr Cooyr I50 \ I " c * . C l h Strrst, a ! Z t h*Cw ? mk KY Im1S - - 2'). Sheldon Silvcrnl 530 G r a d S w . 659 Ym Y~ork,h'Y 1Mk2 30. Knlh L,T. Wnflfl of 2225 Fifh i\vm4ae NP, Y0rk.W IN37 3 1. Clm.rlincC Q u m d ? 6 ; Yn.h Amu; U3k h e x York. XY 1 m l 32 \ V I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ F ! ~ I ~ : S V C C I : - - K W Y O T ~ L , N Y ~ O O ~ ~ 33, 5wr.Slringer ar 155. rckl?!sr Smcr PSA New Ymk NY 10022 34. F.m)w Gislc rr4rfl W m 2 4 h SYS Stw l'ork, NY lOOl4 35. k x A 6 m 0: 11 Pc;l:ar A%mut C r c W P~rk NY 1 4 2 7 36, Stcpbm~ : K kcr ICZ 1VmLvdr MI*. 5 y m c ~ ~NY e . 13221 37. Mwcl C.tm:a3 Irabel Road Omgcbu~i$ Nl' :OM2 % ;. A n w K i r n e Antalonc l P ? ' 4Rh Sam As!& BY I110s 39. Gmc.U,%g or I471 4 34th At,mue - fluSh:s$. h y 112% 4 0 . hmhc b>b3?%: . . r , , * Oual:!.e :n %nos Countv FILING NOTICE: PDF available at : http:/ / ~ . s e r i b d , c o m / d o c / 1 177392921 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT In re Christopher-Earl: Stnxnk O i n esse a private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS Christopher-Earl: StrunkO in esse private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary with injury in re the criminal usurpation of the ofice of POTUS by Barack Obama's ineligibility under U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 and reIated law in Petitioner's Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus FRAP Rule 2 1 Order of: A. Stay New York State Justices i n the matter of their denial of Petitioner due process and equal treatment due under the 141h Amt. of the U.S.Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trlaI of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- a Quo Warranto matter; B. The Governor of New York for a NEW U.S. Senate Election in Mew York to comply with the 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution C.The Clerk and Speaker of the U.S.House with Majority J Minority Leaders and President of the W.S. Senate respond to the incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while holding a n office of trust or profit under the 1 4 t h Amt United States and Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2SlC2); D. Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th, 25th amendments and U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S 1C5) Barack Hussein Obama 11 shsuId be eligible to take the oath of office of POTUS January 20, 20 13; E. Congress baning the New York Electoral College vote for Barack Obama. F. Congress to show cause why it should not hold t h e $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack O b m a et al. since 2003 null and void under the 14th Amendment Section 4; 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #28 1 Brooklyn, New York 11238 Cell-845-90 1-6767; chri@stmnk.ws I n r e ClristopRcr-Emrl?Sirmnk Q in- a *arc U.S. C1ttna recured b c n d c i a p PEllllm FOR -4 WRIT OF MAbm.m~us STATE OF NEW YORK 1 ) FS, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE COUNTY OFIUNGS According1y, I, -RON H EEN 1 HALL*being duly sjvom; dwe and say undcr penaIfy of pmjtlry: Am Ever i P yeam of age and not a part). to fiis action. h4y p l ~ c e ofbusinme is located at 6 6 5 5 PARK 11206. On DECEMBER 29 2012,Christopher Shunk insmcted n t to wive a m e wnFomed bound copy of:P-e In re Chistopher-Earl: Strunk 8 in tsse a &WiVateY.S, Citizen secared beneflchry PETITION fOR A WRIT OF M3HfJAMUS WITH PETITrONER'SAFFIDAVIT SUPPORT W I T H EXHIBITS ANKEXED AFFYR3fED DECEMBER 26, 2012 scaicd in a sroperky e d d m s t d envelope to each r e s ~ o n d e n 11s:ed t '3eld'a- for d t ' ~ u e pby - dSK On DECEMBER 2 8 , 2032, I causcd each copy with proper posrage far service bp PRIORITY MAIL on the Listed Electors ar.d r.d)1cre cglch envelope was p ~ p c d addressed y u ? t h the Notificakon "UaQEFlf LEGAL SERVICE' and ' PERSONAL & CONYDEh'TlAL' in the hner left haad comer sent with of the mvtlop that ~ . e thcn s deposited with the US?S for service upon: The nonorable Irvin B . Fathan, Anomry Genera: for the nr~hiapon Dimkt of Columbia 441 4th Street, N W Wsshkgon. DC 20001 01: 701222 1COO0146343026 77tc Hirnorubfe K a m L ?Iw& Clerk of the U.S.Emge 2fRepmatntiws US,Cqi?ol, R ~ o m H 154, TVnsl~jngto~, DC 105 T 5 d % E f34: 701222103001463:P25 .*o':ln A. Bmhtr Speaker of the U.S. House of Reprtsenraf~cs101 ! Lon@ H.O.B. IVsshingron, DC 205 15 DC:03G403700000424 7452 Smaror hrl~ichMcConmell Enired States %ate 317 Russell Sezalc Ofice Buildinp i a s h g l o n , D.C.10510.1702 DC:031 I2550030244262131 Senafar Aarv R-d V n i r d States Senate 572 I!!att Senate Office Building l'ashingtcn, D . C .20510-2803 TX1: 03 1 1250C1M14162 125 Senator Charlm E. Sckumm Unirtd States Senate 322 Had Smart ORice Building Waskicgton, 3.C. 295 10.3201 DC:031 12550000I44262118 Senator W e n Gillibrend Caitd STEM Senate Washington+D.C. Office: 475 Russell Senate OEct B~i!din& District of Columbia 20510-32M DC:03 1 12550030144262101 Joseph R o b i t t c Biden, Jr. President c?f&c U.S. Se3ate C/O the White Wmsc 1600 Penn~yivIvaniaAvenue %PJ Rrasl~hgtaq IK:Z05MI; DC: 03 11ESW30144262064 Barack Ojema d o rhe White H o w I600 Pennsylwnia Amme NUr Wauhinpton, X 20500; DC: 03 1 1255060014326207i Andrew Cuono Governor of W m Yo& Stnte The New York Stare Capitol Abany. New York 12226 DC: 031 12550000144262032 for the Cocmy of Kings ].AS. Pm 1 360 Adarns Hon. David I. Schmidt 1.S.C.Knv York State Snyrcmc Street BrmWp New York 11207 DC:03 120R600001725545j5 Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. New York Sbate S u p m e Cowl for the C@unty of Kings 1A.S. Part 27.360 Adams Smet RmkIyn New York ] 1 207 DC: 03 12550000 144262057 Stcvm C.Farkas, Fsq. of COLLERAH. O'It4a4 A MLLS, L.L.P. 1225 Ffz1&1in Avenue, Suite 450 Garden C i t y ,Nem York It530 DC:031 12550000 142530S8 Joshua Pepper NYS A&st -4.G. Ofice of the NY S Attorney General 126 Rrmdwy 24': RoorbNew Y ~ r k NCW , Y O Y ~~ D I T DC: P MI ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ I u x ~ o P . c Srvorn to before me This d r ; * dey of Dcccmbcr 2012 ROhmEN HALL ITED STATES COURT OF ApPEALS ISlRiCr OF COLUMBIA C~RCUlr i ! I UNITED STIITFS coum OF APPEALS ~OR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT \ \ ~M~ -22013 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-2866 hone: 202-216-7000 I Facsimile: 202-219-8530 I FILED ~CEJ\lEO CIVIL DOCKETING STATEMENT All Cases Other than Administrative c=r-'"' ,.. :} f":r Agency Cases (To be completed by appellant) '" .... ::::i.'i1: 1. CASE NO. 2. DATE DOCKETED: 12-31-~12 v. Respondents see list =(: 3. CASE NAME (lead parties onlY)IN RE CE STRUNK PETITION 4. TYPE OF CASE: ::s .~~: W (:?;~?C" Bankruptcy proceeding 5. IS THIS CASE REQUIRED BY STATUTE TO BE EXPEDITED? (ii) Yes C No If YES, cite statute FRAP Rule 21 ion matter of January 20, 2013 oath of office of POTUS [J District Ct - C US Civil ~) Private Civil CCriminal C [J Bankruptcy - if direct from Bankruptcy Court 15( Original 6. CASE INFORMATION: a. District Court Docket No. Civil Action Criminal --------Bankruptcy Court Docket No. Bankruptcy _ Adversary -------------Ancillary _ Tax Court Docket No. Tax Miscellaneous Electoral colleae b. Review is sought of: L Final Order Interlocutory Order appealable as of right C Interlocutory Order certified for appeal c. Name of judge who entered order being appealed: Judge Magistrate Judge r d. Date of order(s) appealed (use date docketed): f. Has any other notice of appeal been filed in this case? g. Are any motions currently pending in trial court? If YES, identify motion Motion to Dismiss ~; Yes e. Date notice of appeal flled: C No If YES, date filed: --------------------------------------12-31-2012 If YES, date filed: 12-21-2012 C!> Yes C No w sanctions in a NYS SC Kings Petition w Index no.: 21948-2012 h. Has a transcript of proceedings been ordered pursuant to FRAP 10(b)? 0 Yes @ No If NO, why not? There has not been a hearing, only an order declining to sign OSC for hearing schedule i. Has this case been before the Court under another appeal number? ~.' Yes Appeal # @ No j, Are any cases involving the same underlying order or, to counsel's knowledge, involving substantially the same issue, currently pending before the District Court, this Court, another Circuit Court, or the Supreme Court? @ Yes C No If YES, !~ive each case's court and case name, and docket number: NYS SC Kings County Petition with Index 21948-12, USDC DCD 10-00486 (RCL) k. Does this case turn on validity or correct interpretation or application of a statute? ~'Yes 0 No If YES, give popular name and citation of statute '18 USC 2381 to 2390; USC A2S1C2, A2S1C5, 14th &17th Am, 7. Have the parties attempted to resolve issues in this case through arbitration, mediation, or another alternative for dispute resolution? () Yes (i~ No If so, provide program name and participation dates Date Signature :--;----------Name of Party ~~~~~"~~~-------------------------------Name of Counsel for Appellant/Petitioner Address Phone ( Note: ---------------------------------"-----)---- Fax ( ATTACH A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE If counsel for any other party believes that the information submitted is inaccurate or incomplete, counsel may so advise the Clerk within 7 calendar days by letter, with copies to all other parties, specifically referring to the challenged statement. Attach a certificate of service to this form. USAC Form 42 August 2009 (REVISED) .- SlATES COURT OF A~apEALS uNii·G\),;~~·~:~,/;:)~\,\~~\~P:-CU1T DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT -U-N-ITE-D-ST-A-TE-S-:CO::-:-:U=RT:-::O~F-;;:AP~PEA::·.;-;:LS_~FOR O\~ J NITED ." .. ·:··· .. ··----l-S'~I Q 1.'11" ~~_2 I \ ~. '. 'Q 333 Constitution Washington, Avenue, NW FOR OISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ~ FILED CtRUJl1 20\3 DC 20001·2866 Phone' 202-216-7000 I Facsimile: 202-21.-0530 JAN 0 2 201~~ RECEh/EO Case Caption: In RE Christopher Earl Strunklt Petitioner v. Case Number: CLERK See attached list Respondent PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN AGENCY, BOARD, COMMISSION, OR OFFICER Notice is hereby given this the 28 day of __ D_e_c_e_m_b_e_r __ 20 12 that petioner(s) ---------------the n RE Christopher Earl Strunk hereby petitions the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of the order of the respondent(s) see attached list k ------------ entered day ofMc£l4te~ 20 } ~ Attorney for Petitioner(s)/Pro Se Party, Christopher Earl Strunk 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Telephone: (845) 901-6767 USCA Form 12 AUGUST 2009 (Revised) .~HJHOj n ':j/\f?3HnO:J 'S'O -_-0- 0 _ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-2866 Phone: 202-216-7000 1 Facsimile: 202-219-8530 In re Christopher Earl Strunk 13-5005-OP FRAP Rule 27(e) MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT with Rules 27(h) and 32 I, Christopher Earl Strunk in esse, Petitioner, self represented without being an attorney who on December 31,2012 submitted his Original Proceeding petition, one Original with three copies with necessary docketing and supporting procedural applications, that thereafter on January 2,2013 was received by the Clerk of the Court and with notice docketed on January 7, 2013 with motions pending for fee relief; and That Petitioner wishes the court to allow this FRAP Rule 27(e) MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT with Rules 2 7 0 and 32 to grant Petitioner Petition 15,436 word count including footnotes without jurat or 15,628 words with jurat. Dated: January 2013 Brooklyn New York Christopher-Earl: Strunk 0 in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, New York 11238 Cell-845-901-6767;chris@strunk.ws Cc: Respondents" Counsels - 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-2866 Phone: 202-216-7000 | Facsimile: 202-219-8530 In re Christopher Earl Strunk 13-5005-OP Declaration in Support of FRAP Rule 27(e) MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT with Rules 27(h) and 32 I, Christopher Earl Strunk in esse, does state and declare under penalty of perjury with 18 USC §1746: (1) That Petitioner is self represented without being an attorney who on December 31, 2012 submitted his Original Proceeding petition, one Original with three copies with necessary docketing and supporting procedural applications, that thereafter on January 2, 2013 was received by the Clerk of the Court and with notice docketed on January 7, 2013 with motions pending for fee relief. (2) That Petitioner wishes the court to allow this FRAP Rule 27(e) MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT with Rules 27(h) and 32 to grant Petitioner Petition 15,436 word count including footnotes without jurat or 15,628 words with jurat. (3) that Petitioner contends he had submitted his petition in good faith with his error in reading Rule 32(a)(7)(B) (ii) as to petition contents exempt from word count the petition of 50 pages has 13869 words without the jurat and footnotes; however upon rereading understands that the footnotes ARE included for a total of 15,436 words that exceeds the 14000 limit by 1436 words. (4) That a s such Petitioner requests as assistance to the Court, that it allow for the extraordinary added footnote 1436 words, the bulk of which are connected with Petition Paragraph 74; as they are a result of a more than a two year effort to unseal the case Seal v Seal 10-cv-00486 before Judge Lamberth as shown in Exhibit K, and who as a result of my efforts to renew and reargue unsealed the matters allowing me to use my knowledge and direct experience to help exonerate myself; and (5) that the matters referenced in Petition paragraph 74 are matters assisting any decision that the Court herein would make regarding Petitioner's request for relief. (6) That Petitioner on January 7,2013 notified Respondents" counsels Craig Lawrence US AAG at crai~.lawrenc@,usdoi.~ov, Joshua Pepper a t Joshua.Pepper@aa.nv.~ov(see attached email confirmation) and Steven C. Farkas, Esq. on his office contact email and all are copied with this motion by regular mail too. Dated: January% 2013 Brooklyn New York 593 ~ a n d e r b i lAvenue t #281 Brooklyn, New York 11238 Cell-845-901-6767;chris@strunk.ws [FWD: In re: Christopher Strunk US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Docket ... http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=65&filterBy=&... [FWD: In re: Christopher Strunk US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Docket #: 13-5005-OP] Monday, January 7, 2013 9:17 PM From: "chris@strunk.ws" To: "Christopher Strunk" FYI -------- Original Message -------Subject: In re: Christopher Strunk US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Docket #: 13-5005-OP From: Date: Mon, January 07, 2013 7:00 pm To: craig.lawrence@usdoj.gov Cc: "Joshua Pepper" Mr. Craig Lawrence Esq. USDOJ I received this docket entry today for 2013-5005-OP that is safely loaded to SCRIBD at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/CONFORMED-USCA-DC-Circuit-Petition-for-Writof-Mandamus-for-Relief-12-PENDING-OP-with-Application-for-fee-relief Be notified that I intend to file a motion for over-sized petition tomorrow. Respectfully Chris Strunk 845-901-6767 ps a copy of this notice has also been sent to Steven C. Farkas, Esq. -------- Original Message -------Subject: In re: Christopher Strunk Court of Appeals Docket #: 13-5005 From: "Bill Van Allen" Date: Mon, January 07, 2013 4:46 pm To: "Christopher Strunk" Cc: General Docket United States Court  of Appeals for  District  of Columbia Circuit Court  of Appeals Docket  #: 13 ‐5005 In re: Christopher  Strunk Appeal From:  United States  District Court for  the District of Columbia Fee  Status: IFP Pending USCA Case  Type  Informati on: 1) Orig. Proceeding US 2) Mandamus 3) Originati ng Court  Information: District:  0090 ‐1  : Docketed:  01/07/2013 1 of 3 1/9/2013 8:00 PM [FWD: In re: Christopher Strunk US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Docket ... http://us.mc1257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=65&filterBy=&... Prior Cases: None Current  Cases: None Panel Assignment:  Not available In re: Christopher  Earl  Strunk In re ‐ Petitioner Christopher  Earl  Strunk Direct: 845‐901‐6767 [NTC Pro Se] Firm: 212 ‐307‐4444 593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 Brooklyn, NY 11238 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ R. Craig Lawrence Email: craig.lawrence@usdoj.gov [NTC Gvt Atty USAO/AUSA] U.S. Attorney's  O ffi ce (USA) Civil  Division Firm: 202 ‐514‐7159 555 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20530 In re: Christopher  Earl  Strunk, In re ‐ Petitioner 01/07/2013 01/07/2013 US CIVIL ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [13 ‐5005] PETITION filed [1413882] by Petitioner  Christopher  Earl  Strunk for  writ of mandamus. [Service Date: 01/07/2013  by CM/ECF NDA] Pages: Exceeds  Limits. [13‐5005] MOTION filed [1413883] by Christopher  Earl  Strunk to proceed on appeal  in forma  pauperis  [Case Number  13‐5005: IFP Pending USCA] [Service Date: 01/07/2013  ] Pages: 1‐10. [13‐5005] 314 pg, 31.69 MB 01/07/2013 7 pg, 307.87 KB 01/07/2013 3 pg, 189.39 KB     Case  Selecti on Page Case  Number Title Opening Date Party Last  Docket Originating Case  Number Entry Origin 0090‐1  : ‐ 06/24/2009 United States  District Court for  the District of 12:09:48 Columbia 0090‐1  : 1:08 ‐cv‐2234 11/25/2009 United States  District Court for  the District of 14:52:03 Columbia 0090‐1  : 1:09 ‐cv‐01295 ‐RJL 04/22/2010 United States  District Court for  the District of 14:46:29 Columbia 0090‐1  : 1:09 ‐cv‐01295 ‐RJL 12/02/2010 United States  District Court for  the District of 16:49:16 Columbia 0090‐1  : 1:09 ‐cv‐01249 ‐RJL 12/02/2010 United States  District Court for  the District of 16:50:24 Columbia 0090‐1  : 1:08 ‐cv‐02234 ‐RJL 01/14/2011 United States  District Court for  the District of 17:41:13 Columbia 0090‐1  : 1:10 ‐cv‐00486 ‐RCL 01/03/2013 United States  District Court for  the District of 13:23:38 Columbia 0090‐1  : 1:08 ‐cv‐02234 ‐RJL 01/07/2013 United States  District Court for  the District of 10:48:17 Columbia 01/07/2013 United States  District Court for  the District of 15:22:23 Columbia 08 ‐5503 In re: Christopher  Earl  Strunk 09 ‐5322 In re: Christopher  Strunk 10 ‐5077 In re: Christopher  Strunk 10 ‐5082 Christopher  Strunk v. Department of Commerce, et al 12/03/2008 Christopher  Earl Strunk Christopher  Earl Strunk Christopher  Earl Strunk Christopher  Earl Strunk Christopher  Earl Strunk Christopher  Earl Strunk Christopher  Earl Strunk Christopher  Earl Strunk Christopher  Earl Strunk 09/17/2009 03/24/2010 03/26/2010 10 ‐5091 Christopher  Strunk v. NY Prov. of the Soc. of Jesus, 03/31/2010 et al 10 ‐5092 Christopher  Strunk v. Department of State, et al 12 ‐5289 Christopher  Strunk v. Barack Obama, et al 12 ‐5414 Christopher  Strunk v. DOS, et al 13 ‐5005 In re: Christopher  Strunk 03/31/2010 09/13/2012 12/28/2012 01/07/2013   2 of 3 1/9/2013 8:00 PM UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-2866 Phone: 202-216-7000 1 Facsimile: 202-219-8530 In re Christopher Earl Strunk CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 13-5005-OP On January 10, 2013, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 USC 81746, caused the service of a copy of the Petitioner's Notice with Declaration in Support of FRAP Rule 27(e) MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT with Rules 27(h) and 32 with Exhibit annexed affirmed January 9,2013 a s a complete set of which each placed i n a sealed folder properly addressed with proper postage served by USPS mail upon: The Honorable Irvin B. Nathan, Attorney General for the Washington District of Columbia 441 4th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 The Honorable Karen L. Haas, Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Capitol, Room H154, Washington, DC 20515-6601 R. Craig Lawrence USAOIAUSA] U.S. Attorney's Office (USA) Civil Division 555 4th Street, N W Washington, DC 20530 Steven C. Farkas, Esq. of COLLERAN, O'HARA & MILLS, L.L.P. 1225 Franklin Avenue, Suite 450 Garden City, New York 11530 Joshua Pepper NYS Assist. A.G. Office of the NYS Attorney General 120 Broadway 24th FloorbNew York, New York 10271 I do declare and certify under penalty of perjury. Dated: ~ a n a u/ r 0~ ,2013 Brooklyn, New York ~8- Christopher- Earl :Strunk in esse 593 Vanderbilt Avenue- #281 Brooklyn., New York 11238 (845) 901-6767 Email: chris@,strunk.ws DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 333 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-2866 Phone: 202-216-7000 1 Facsimile: 202-219-8530 USCA NO. 13-5005-OP MOTION FOR WAIVER OF FEES I Christopher Earl Strunk declare that because of my poverty I am unable to prepay the costs of retrieval and photocopying the requested documents in the above case. My affidavit is attached. I I believe I am entitled to these documents because: (Provide a statement of the reasons you wish to present to the Court.) IFP application filed 12-31 -12 and stamped received by Iam requesting relief of filling Fee based upo the Clerk 1-2-1 3 as my sole source of income is my Social Security payment received every month on the fourth Wednesday. However, that were the Clerk of the court to issue an order for payment of the entire amount of fee that I would be able to show to a third person to pay I would seek that payment method. 9 Signature Name of Requester Christopher Earl Strunk - Address 593 Vanderbilt Avenue 281 Brooklyn New York 1 1 238 - Submit original to: Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit U.S. Courthouse, Room 5523 Washington, D.C. 20001 USCA Form 32 August 2009 (REVISED) I UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO WAIVE FEES I swear (afftnn) that the responses which 1 make below to the questions concerning my ability to pay the costs as stated in the motion are true. 1. Are you presently employed? a. 0 Yes @ No If the answer is "yes", state the amount of your salary or wages per month and give the name and address of your employer. (List both gross and net salary.) Gross salary and wages per month: $ Net salary and wages per month: $ Employer Name: Address: b. If the answer is "no", state the date of your last employment and the amount of the salary and wages per-conth which you received. $ ado pa b Date of last employment:pp04-2009 Salary and wages per month: $0 ''3 ud iN MG P ,e ,r ,r~ 2. Have your received within the past twelve months any income or property from any of the following sources? a. Business, profession or other form of self-employment? b. Rent payments, interest, or dividends? c yes C Yes C Yes C Yes @ NO @ No @ No @ No c. Pensions, annuities or life insurance policies? d. Gifts or inheritances? e. Any other sources? ( 3 : Yes (5! No If the answer to any of the above is "yes", describe each source of money and state the amount received from each during the past 12 months. Source:Social Security payment monthly Source: Source: Source: Source: USCA Form 32 August 2009 (REVISED) Amount: $1, I 00 Amount: $ Amount: $ Amount: $ Amount: $ 3. Do you own any cash or checking or savings accounts (includingjoint accounts)? (2 Yes a. If the answer is "yes," state the total value of the items owned: $200 r NO 4. Do you own any real estate, stocks, bonds, notes, automobiles, or other valuable property (excluding ordinary household furnishings and clothing)? (2 Yes C No a. If the answer is "yes," describe the property and state its approximate value. Approximate value: $600 (1) f20 Bond - Chinese Government 5% Reorg. Gold Loan Of 1913 SN: 411339 (1) $20 Bond -National ROC Government - US $ Loan of 1942 Ser. No.: 0064833 Misc. Computer equipment and hand tools 5. List any persons who are dependent upon you for support, state your relationship to those persons, and indicate how much you contribute toward their support. Dependent: DR - 18 years of age Amount: Relationship: Son Dependent: Relationship: Dependent: Relationship: Dependent: Relationship: Dependent: Relationship: $f 20 Amount: $ Amount: $ Amount: $ Amount: $ rgoing is true and correct. Signature of applicant Name of Requester christopher Earl Strunk Address 593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 281 Brooklyn New York 11238 Executed on:JR q ? 7 USCA Form 53b August 2009 (REVISED) 49 s m *-u t o sz * % * * * * * * Z 4 Z
Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful