BIRTHER SCORECARD

CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

1.

Allen v. Soetoro
(FOIA)

D. Ariz. (Federal Court) 4:09-cv-00373 Justia - RECAP 1
H H H HF

DISMISSED as to Request for Obama documents2 Remaining Claims Voluntarily Dismissed

9th Circuit: 10-15290
Appeal as to Obama docs

--No
Gov. defended

APPEAL DISMISSED 9th Circuit: 11-15094
DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

Kenneth L. Allen Citation Arizona Pima County Super. Ct. C20121046 Citation Arizona Pima County Super. Ct. C20121317 Citation M.D. Tenn (Federal) 3:09mc00215 Justia - RECAP

Allen v. Soetoro, 4:09-cv-00373 (D. Ariz. Jan. 29, 2010) (dismissing FOIA action seeking documents related to Obama’s eligibility) aff’d, No, 11-15094 (9th Cir. Jul. 23, 2012); DISMISSED Amended Complaint Filed Feb. 24, 2012 No ----No appearance on behalf of Obama; AZ Democratic Party defended

2.

Allen v. Obama et al Kenneth L. Allen

Allen v. Obama et al, No. C20121046 (Ariz. Pima County Super. Ct. Feb. 24, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot); DISMISSED Notice of Appeal Filed – but appeal apparently abandoned thereafter No
No appearance on behalf of Obama; AZ Democratic Party defended

3.

Allen v. Barack Obama et al Kenneth L. Allen

Allen v. Obama et al, No. C20121317 (Ariz. Pima County Super. Ct., Mar. 7, 2012) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the 2012 ballot; finding that Obama is a “natural born citizen” under Wong Kim Ark; and expressly rejecting argument that Minor v. Happersett holds otherwise); No DISMISSED
H

4.

American Grand Jury Mack H. Ellis Donald McDougall

---

---

H

Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation

In re Am. Grand Jury, No. 3:09-mc-00215 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 6, 2009) (summarily rejecting grand jury “presentment” challenging President Obama’s eligibility to serve as President as having no force under U.S. Constitution or law);

1 2

Note: The Justia has easy-to-read explanations of all the various filings. The RECAP, while not as reader-friendly, has links to many of the pleadings filed in the case. Note: Allen’s FOIA claims regarding Stanley Obama are still pending.
Page 1 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

5.

American Grand Jury 3 Robert C. Laity, Robert J. Campbell
F

W.D.N.Y. (Federal) No Number Assigned
H

No REJECTED ----Court dismissed sua sponte

American Grand Jury, No Number Assigned (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2009) (letter from court staff attorney Citation explaining that court could not accept “presentment” prepared by public, seeking to indict Obama for ineligibility to hold office and related matters); U.S. Supreme Court (Issue not raised in D.Md. and 4th Cir.) 8:10-cv-00017-PJM (D. Md.) (No birther claims made) 10-1951 (4th Cir.) (No birther claims made) No. 10-612 Petition for Rehearing (to address birther issue) DENIED

6.

Anderson v. Obama
Daniel G. Anderson
William Colliton, M.D. Richard P. Delaney, M.D. Richard Loria, M.D. Lorenzo Marcolin, M.D. Gaetano Molinari, M.D. James Ronan, M.D. Edward Sheridan, M.D. Edward Soma, M.D. Ronald Uscinski, M.D.

No

Anderson v. Obama, No. 10-612, 2012 WL 1969419 (U.S. Jun. 4, 2012) (denying motion for leave to file petition for rehearing in case challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act, where petition sought an order compelling (a) the U.S. Marshalls to travel to Hawaii; (b) the Hawaii Department Citation of Health to release the “original” birth certificate of Obama to the U.S. Marshalls; (c) the U.S. Marshalls to bring the certificate to the Supreme Court; and (d) the U.S. Secret Service to examine and verify whether the document is a forgery);

3

Note: American Grand Jury has attempted to file multiple additional “presentments,” in at least the following courts: Alabama Federal Court – Southern District (Donald Gaines); California Federal Court – Central District (Armando Carranza); Connecticut Supreme Court (Unknown); Florida Federal Court – Northern District (Norman Caron); Kansas State Court (Wichita/18th Judicial District) (Bradley Kramer); New Hampshire State Court (Salem District) (Unknown); New Hampshire Federal District Court (Daniel Hunt); Tennessee Federal Court – Western District (Donald McDougall); Middle District Texas Federal Court – Western District (Lesley Lawson). To date, however, there is no indication that any of these courts have accepted the documents as filed and, therefore, they are not “pending.”
H H H H H H H H H H H H H

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 2 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

7.

Ankeny v. Daniels Steve Ankeny

Indiana State Court Marion Superior Court 49D10-0812-PL-55511

DISMISSED

Indiana Appellate Court DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Finding Obama is NBC
H

No --Obama not a defendant

Petition for Rehearing DENIED

Indiana Supreme Court
Transfer to Ind. Sup. Ct. DENIED

Citation D.D.C. (Federal) 1:11-cv-02028-RBW Justia | RECAP Citation

Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, No. 49D10-0812-PL-055511, 2009 WL 1632611 (Ind. Marion County Super. Ct. Mar. 16, 2009) (dismissing challenge to McCain’s and Obama’s eligibility), aff’d, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (holding that Obama, who was born in Hawaii, is a “natural born citizen” eligible to be president), transfer denied, 929 N.E.2d 789 (Ind. 2010); Pending No
Obama not a Defendant

8.

Archibald v. DOJ George H. Archibald

Archibald v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, No. 1:11-cv-02028-RBW (D.D.C., filed Nov. 16, 2011);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 3 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

C.D. Cal. (Federal) 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Justia - RECAP
H H H

9.

Barnett et al v Obama et al Pamela Barnett

DISMISSED Motion for Reconsideration DENIED Motion to Transfer DENIED Motion for Reconsideration (Aug 2012) DENIED
H H

9th Circuit: Kreep as Atty: 09-56827 No. 11-1225 Taitz as Atty: 10-55084 (Keyes et al v. Obama) AFFIRMED DENIED Reh’g and Reh’g En Banc DENIED
H H

No
Gov. defending

Writ of Mandamus filed in 10-55084 DENIED4

Citation

Barnett v. Obama, No. 8:09-cv-00082, 2009 WL 3861788 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility; criticizing conduct of plaintiff’s counsel in case filed on behalf of active and former military personnel, state representatives, taxpayers, relatives, and political candidates), order clarified, 2009 WL 8557250 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2009), aff’d sub nom. Drake v. Obama, 664 F.3d 774 (9th Cir., 2011), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, Nos. 09-56827, 10-55084 (Feb. 2, 2012), cert denied, 132 S. Ct. 2748 (U.S. Jun. 11, 2012); motion for recon, No. 8:09-cv-00082 (Aug 31, 2012) (denying petition for rehearing/reopening of case in district court);

10.

Begay v. Obama Arnold James Begay

D. Ariz. (Federal) No. 2:12-cv-01948-PGR— BSB Justia - RECAP
H H

Pending Begay v. Obama, No. 2:12-cv-01948 (D. Ariz., filed Sept. 13, 2012)

Citation

4

Note: On November 3, 2011, Taitz filed an Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, seeking order directing Hawaii officials to provide access to original birth certificate documents regarding Obama.
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 4 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

11.

Berg v. Obama et al Philip Berg

E.D. Pa. (Federal) 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Justia - RECAP
H H H H H

DISMISSED

3rd Circuit: 08-4340 Emgcy Motion: DENIED 2nd Emgcy Motion: DENIED
H H H

Application (08A391) DENIED5 Application (08A505) DENIED Rule 11 Writ (08570) DENIED6
H H H

Yes

Appeal DISMISSAL AFFIRMED
H

---

Citation D.D.C. (Federal) 1:08cv01933 Justia - RECAP

Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility; characterizing various plaintiff’s claims as frivolous), aff’d, 586 F.3d 234 (3d Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 1126, (2009); DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED
H H

12.

Berg v. Obama Philip Berg (False Claims Act)

H

H

H

DC Circuit: 09-5362 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED
H H

---

No
Gov. defending

Citation Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 186 MD 2012 Citation

Berg v. Obama, No. 1:08-cv-01933 (D.D.C. June 9, 2009) (dismissing qui tam case claiming Obama is not a U.S. citizen), recons. denied, 656 F. Supp. 2d 107 (D.D.C. 2009), aff’d, 383 F. App’x. 7 (D.C. Cir. 2010); DISMISSED ----Yes

13.

Berg v. Obama Philip Berg

Berg v. Obama, No. 186 MD 2012 (Pa. Commw. Ct., Mar. 16, 2012) (dismissing complaint filed to challenge Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot);

5 6

129 S.Ct. 1030, 173 L.Ed.2d 290, 77 USLW 3428. 129 S.Ct. 920, 173 L.Ed.2d 158, 77 USLW 3281, 77 USLW 3392, 77 USLW 3399.
Page 5 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

14.

Beverly v. FEC Arnold Dewalt Beverly

E.D. Cal. (Federal) 1:08-cv-01538-AWI-GSA Justia - RECAP
H H H H

DISMISSED

9th Circuit: 09-15562 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Reconsideration DENIED
H H

Writ 09-794 DENIED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation M.D. Ala. (Federal) 2:10cv00609 Justia - RECAP Citation Texas State Court Williamson County, (368th Judicial District) 08-1001-C365

Beverly v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 1:08-cv-01538-AWI-GSA, 2009 WL 196361 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2009) (dismissing case that included claims regarding Obama’s eligibility), aff’d, No. 09-15562 (9th Cir. July 1, 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1732 (2010); DISMISSED DISMISSAL AFFIRMED No --Court dismissed sua sponte

15.

Bowhall v. Obama William E. Bowhall

Bowhall v. Obama, No. 2:10-cv-0609, 2010 WL 4932747, (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2010) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is not a “natural born citizen,” as frivolous), aff’d, No. 10-15938-C (11th Cir. Apr. 4, 2011) (affirming order that complaint was frivolous); No
Obama not a Defendant

16.

Brockhausen v. Andrade Jody A. Brockhausen

DISMISSED
H

---

---

Citation Washington State Supreme Court 82473-8 Citation

Brockhausen v. Andrade, No. 08-1001-C368 (Tex. Williamson County Dist. Ct. (368th) Jan. 22, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility);
Action filed in Supreme Court

17.

Broe v. Reed James Broe

DISMISSED
H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Broe v. Reed, No. 82473-8 (Wash. Jan. 8, 2009) (dismissing writ of mandamus challenging Obama’s eligibility);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 6 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name The Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri et al v. Obama et al7 Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket W.D. Mo. (Federal) 6:08cv03405 Justia - RECAP
H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

DISMISSED

No. 11-3557 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

No --No appearance made on behalf of Obama

Citation D.D.C. (Federal) 1:08cv02150 Justia - RECAP

Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri et al v. Obama, No. 6:08cv03405, 2011 WL 4916569 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 17, 2011) (dismissing case brought on, among other bases, that, as non-white, Obama is not eligible to hold office), aff’d, No. 09-5012 (8th Cir. Jan. 31, 2012); No. 09-5012 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Rehearing Denied
H

No --Court dismissed sua sponte

DISMISSED
H

18.

Cohen v. Obama L. Charles Cohen

H

H

H

Citation Fla. Circuit Court (6th Cir) No. 512012CA2041WS Citation Florida State Court State Supreme Court SC08-2338
H H

Cohen v. Obama, No. 1:08-cv-02150, 2008 WL 5191864 (D.D.C. Dec. 11, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility), aff’d, 332 F. App’x. 640 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (per curiam), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, No. 09-5012 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 25, 2009); DISMISSED Yes

19.

Collette v. Obama et al Jerry Collette

Collette v Obama et al, No. 512012CA2041WS (Fla. 6th Cir. Ct., Sept. 9, 2012 (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from appearing on 2012 ballot));
Action filed in Supreme Court

20.

Connerat v. Browning William Spencer Connerat III

DISMISSED
H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

No --Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation

Connerat v. Browning, 999 So. 2d 644 (Table) 2008 WL 5378138 (Fla.2008) (dismissing petition for extraordinary emergency writ of mandamus challenging Obama’s eligibility);

7

Note: We previously counted this case as a “birther case.” We did so based on some secondary reporting on the case, which was the only information available at the time because the docket was “sealed” and not available to the public. However, it has since become available and our review indicates that although the plaintiffs clearly sought to prevent Obama from serving as President, they did not base their opposition on any birther theories; rather, the apparent basis was the fact that Obama is not white. Therefore, we have removed this case from the “count,” while keeping the RECAP/related information available for archival purposes.
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 7 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Florida State Court Pinellas County Small Claims Court No. 09003103SC
H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

21.

Connerat v. Obama William Spencer Connerat III

No DISMISSED ----Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation Florida State Court Pinellas County Small Claims Court No. 09005522SC

Connerat v. Obama, No. 09003103SC (Fla. Pinellas County Small Claims Ct. May 5, 2009) (dismissing claim brought against Obama on grounds that he is not “natural born citizen); No DISMISSED
H

22.

Connerat v. Obama William Spencer Connerat III

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

H

Citation M.D. Fla. (Federal) 8:11-cv-01359 Justia - RECAP Citation Hawaii Supreme Court No. 29743

Connerat v. Obama, No. 09005522SC (Fla. Pinellas County Small Claims Ct. Jul 28, 2009) (dismissing claim brought against Obama on grounds that he is not “natural born citizen); No DISMISSED ----Court dismissed sua sponte

23.

Connerat v. Obama William Spencer Connerat III

Connerat v. Obama, No. 8:11-cv-01359-SDM-TGW (M.D. Fla. Dec. 21, 2011) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility);
Action filed in Supreme Court

24.

Constitution Party v. Lingle Alan Keyes

DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED
H H H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation M.D. Ga. (Federal) 4:2009cv00082 Justia - RECAP

Constitution Party v. Lingle, No. 29473, 2008 WL 5125984 (Haw. Dec. 5, 2008) (dismissing complaint contesting 2008 Presidential election results and rejecting contention that defendant improperly failed to require proof that candidate Barack Obama was qualified to be a candidate for President of the United States), recons. denied (Dec. 12, 2008); TRO DENIED CASE DISMISSED
H H

25.

Cook v. Good et al Stefan Cook

11th Circuit: 09-14698C Appeal DISMISSED
H

---

No
Gov. defended

H

H

H

Citation

Cook v. Good, No. 4:09-cv-00082, 2009 WL 2163535 (M.D. Ga. July 16, 2009) (denying TRO seeking stay of military orders pending confirmation of Obama’s eligibility; dismissing case), appeal dismissed, No. 0914698-CC (11th Cir. Nov. 24, 2009);
Page 8 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket M.D. Fla. (Federal) 8:2009cv01382 Justia - RECAP
H H H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

26.

Cook v. Simtech, et al Stefan Cook

TRO DENIED; CASE DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED
H H H

No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation California Orange County Superior Court 30-2008-00114112-CU-FRCJC Citation

Cook v. Simtech, No. 8:2009cv01382 (M.D. Fla., July 27, 2009), recons. denied, (Aug. 6, 2009) (finding motion to reconsider “frivolous and wholly without merit); No DISMISSED ----Case dismissed before any defendants made an appearance

27.

Corbett v. Bowen Joan Corbett

Corbett v. Bowen, No. 30-2008-00114112-CU-FR- CJC, (Cal. Orange Cty. Super. Ct. June 8, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility); No DISMISSED --Court dismissed sua sponte

28.

Craig v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Sec., et al Steven Lee Craig

W.D. Okla. (Federal) 5:10-cv-00659-C Citation U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals.

Craig v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Sec. et al, No. 5:10-cv-00659-C (W.D. Okla. July 3, 2010) (dismissing case challenging various government publications defining term “natural born citizen” as unconstitutional); 10th Circuit: No. 11-9501 Decision AFFIRMED Petition for Reh’g DENIED No
Obama not a Defendant

29.

Craig v. Holder Steven Lee Craig

Relief DENIED

Citation W.D. Okla. (Federal) 5:09-cv-00343-F Justia - RECAP

Craig v. Holder, No. 11-9501 (10th Cir. Mar. 17, 2011) (affirming Board of Immigration denial of request to certify that Craig is “natural born citizen” eligible for presidency), reh’g denied (Apr. 29, 2011); DISMISSED Leave to Amend DENIED
H H

30.

Craig v. United States Steven Lee Craig

H

H

H

10th Circuit: No. 09-6082 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED
H

Rule 11 Writ DENIED (08-10817)8
H

No
Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation

Craig v. United States, No. 5:09-cv-00343-F (W.D. Okla. Apr. 3, 2009) (dismissing case seeking declaration regarding definition of natural born citizen as “incomprehensible and frivolous”), aff’d, No. 096082, 340 F. App’x. 471 (10th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 141 (2009);

8

130 S.Ct. 141, 78 USLW 3181.
Page 9 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket W.D. Okla. (Federal) 5:10-cv-01345-C Justia - RECAP
H H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

31.

Craig v. United States (FOIA) Steven Lee Craig

DISMISSED

10th Circuit: 11-6017 DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation Oklahoma Supreme Court No. MA-109808 Citation Oh. Common Pleas Ct Geauga County No. 12M000653 SCRIBD Docs Citation Oh. Common Pleas Ct Geauga County Misc. No. #223 Citation E.D. Cal. (Federal) 2:08cv02754 Justia - RECAP

Craig v. United States, No. 5:10-cv-01345-C (W.D. Okla., Jan. 4, 2011) (Dismissing VOIA action brought to obtain documents related to federal definition of “natural born citizen”), appeal voluntarily dismissed, No. 11-6017 (10th Cir. Feb. 10, 2011); DISMISSED (Application Denied; All Justices Concur)
N/A: Original filing in OK Supreme Court

32.

Craig v. Oklahoma Steven Lee Craig

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Craig v. Oklahoma, No. MA-109808 (Okla. Oct. 17, 2011) (dismissing application seeking determination of definition of “natural born citizen” for purposes of presidential eligibility); DISMISSED

33.

Daniels v. Husted (OH SOS) Susan Daniels

Daniels v. Husted, No. 12M000653 (Oh. Commn Pleas Ct, Sept. 7, 2012) (dismissing complaint filed seeking to prevent Obama from being on ballot in Ohio 2012 general election);

Daniels Susan Daniels

In re: Daniels, Misc. No. 223 (Oh. Commn Pleas Ct, filed Sept. 12, 2012) (affidavit filed pursuant to Oh. Rev. Code. § 2935.09).9 DISMISSED Recommendation & Order
H H H

No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

34.

Dawson v. Obama Kenneth D. Dawson

H

H

H

Citation

Dawson v. Obama, No. 2:08cv02754, 2009 WL 532617 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility);

9

Not “counted” because not a pending case. However, included in scorecard for links/tracking purposes.
Page 10 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket New York Board of Elections No number Assigned Citation New Jersey State Court
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Objection OVERRULED

---

---

Unknown

35.

Dean v. Obama Thomas Dean

In re Objection of Thomas Dean, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid);
Action filed in Appeals Court

36.

Donofrio v Wells Leo Donofrio

No. AN-0153-08T2 APPLICATION DENIED

NJ Supreme Court APPLICATION DENIED
H

Application DENIED (08A407)10

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation
37.

Donofrio v. Wells, No. AM-0153-08T2 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Oct. 30, 2008) (denying application for emergent relief challenging eligibility of McCain and Obama), aff’d, No. _____ (N.J. Oct. 31, 2008), application for stay denied, 129 S. Ct. 752 (2008); DISMISSED Dummett at al v. Bowen, No. 34-2012-80001091(Cal. Sacramento Cty. Sup. Ct., Oct. 26, 2012) (dismissing birther case seeking to prevent placement of Obama on 2012 general election ballot);
N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

Dummett et al v. Bowen
John Albert Dummett, r.; Markham Robinson; The Constitution Party; Gil Houston; Larry Lakamp; Milo L. Johnson; Joe Ott

California Superior Court Sacramento County No. 34-2012-80001091 Citation S.D. Tex. (Federal) 4:08-mc-00504 Justia - RECAP
H H H H

No --Obama not a Defendant; Court dismissed sua sponte

Ealey v. Sarah Obama James E. Ealey11

DISMISSED

Citation

Ealey v. Sarah Obama, No. 4:08-mc-00504 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2008) (dismissing case alleging that Obama’s grandmother cast spells on various people in the United States);

10 11

129 S.Ct. 752, 172 L.Ed.2d 724, 77 USLW 3344.

Note: We had originally classified this as a birther case; however upon further review, we’ve determined that the case alleges no birther factual or legal theories. Therefore, we’ve retained it on the chart, but did not count it as a “birther case.”
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 11 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Easterling v. Obama Scott Easterling
38.

Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

US Supreme Court Not Docketed12 Alaska Division of Elections No Number Assigned Citation Alaska Superior Court No. IJU-12-694-CI Citation D. Alaska Federal Court No. 1:12-cv-00011-TMB

No Not Docketed ----Never docketed/accepted by Court

Epperly v. Obama Gordon Warren Epperly

REJECTED

---

---

No

Epperly v. Obama, No Number Assigned (Alaska Div. of Elections (Gail Fenumiai, Director) Feb. 28, 2012) (dismissing petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the 2012 ballot); REMOVED to Federal Court See below Epperly v. Obama, No. IJU-12-694-CI (Alaska Superior Ct, filed June 25, 2012; removed to federal court July 27, 2012); DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS Motion for Reconsideration DENIED

39.

Epperly v. Obama Gordon Warren Epperly

Epperly v. Obama Gordon Warren Epperly

Epperly v. Obama et al, No. 1:12-cv-00011-TMB (D. Alaska, Aug. 24, 2012) (dismissing complaint Citation seeking, among other things, declaration that Obama is not eligible to serve as President), recon. Denied (Oct. 2, 2012). E.D. Ky. (Federal) 08-379-GFVT Justia - RECAP
H H H H

No DISMISSED ----Court dismissed sua sponte

40.

Essek v. Obama Daniel John Essek

Citation

Essek v. Obama, 08-379-GFVT (E.D. Ky., Jan. 15, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility);

12

Note: This case was apparently filed as an original action in the Supreme Court in June 2009. However, it was never docketed. It was subsequently included as an exhibit in document #69, filed in Barnett v. Obama (C.D. Cal.) on September 21, 2009. We treat this case in the same manner as the various “grand jury presentments” (see supra, Note 5) - i.e., given that it was never officially docketed and considered by the court, it does not “count” as a case for purposes of the Scorecard. However, we include it here, with a link to the filing for reference purposes.
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 12 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Maryland Carroll County Circuit Court 06-C-12-060692 Citation Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1215136-60-MALlHI Citation
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8 DISMISSED

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

41.

Fair v. Obama Tracey Fair

Finding Obama is NBC

Not Yet Determined

Fair v. Obama, No. 06C12060692 (Md. Carroll Cty. Cir. Ct., Aug. 27, 2012 (relying on Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark to hold that Obama is a “natural born citizen” eligible to serve as President); Objection DENIED - Obama Eligible (ALJ) Finding Obama is NBC Secretary of State Final Decision Finding Obama is NBC (Adopting ALJ Decision)

42.

Farrar v. Obama David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren, Laurie Roth

See below

See below

Farrar v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215136-60-MALlHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012); Georgia Supreme Court No. S12D1180 DENIED Appeal of SOS Decision DISMISSED Georgia Supreme Court No. S12D1584 Pending (Cody Judy only) Application Dismissed
Farrar App. for Stay No. 12A25 Denied by Justice Thomas Cert DENIED No. 12-5276

Farrar et al. v. Obama, Sec’y of State David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Robert Judy, Thomas Malaren, Laurie Roth

Georgia Fulton County Superior Ct 2012CV211398

Yes in Trial Court No in GA Sup. Ct

Yes in Trial Court No in GA Sup. Ct

Citation

Farrar v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215136-60-MALlHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012), appeal dismissed, Farrar et al v. Obama, No. 2012CV211398 (Ga. Fulton Cty. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2012), recons. denied (Mar. 14, 2012), appeal denied, No. S12D1180 (Ga. Apr. 11, 2012); application dismissed, Cody v. Obama, No. S12D1584 (Ga. Jun. 21, 2012), cert denied, No. 12-5276 (U.S. Sept. 24, 2012);.

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 13 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Fitzpatrick v. Obama 13 Walter Fitzpatrick III
F

Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
North Carolina State Court Tennessee State Court Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

43.

DISMISSED

---

---

No

Citation Illinois Board of Elections Objection ID: 1229| Election ID: 32 12 SOEB GP 103

Fitzpatrick v. Obama, No. 09R81 (N.C. Catawba Cty. Super. Ct. May 2009) (rejecting purported “indictment” issued against Obama on grounds that he was not a natural born citizen eligible to serve as President); Challenge OVERRULED Finding Obama is NBC (Hearing Officer Recommendation)

44.

Freeman v. Obama Benjamin C. Freeman

---

---

Unknown

Freeman v. Obama, 12 SOEB GP 103 (Ill. Bd. of Elections Hearing Officer Recommendation Jan. 27, 2012) (overruling objection to Obama’s placement on 2012 primary ballot; finding that Obama’s long form Citation birth certificate “clearly establishes” his eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen”), objection overruled (Ill. Bd. of Elections, Feb. 3, 2012); Ill. Bd. of Elections Objection ID: 1306 Election ID: 33 OVERRULED Freeman v. Obama, No. 12 SOEB GE 112 (Ill. Bd. Elections, Sept. 17, 2012) (overruling objection filed seeking to keep Obama off general election ballot in 2012 on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”; relying on prior decision (12 SOEB GP 103) which held that Obama’s long form birth certificate sufficiently established birth in the United States)

45.

Freeman v. Obama Benjamin C. Freeman

Citation

13

Note: According to some websites, Fitzpatrick has filed a few complaints against Obama, including, most recently, a “criminal complaint” reportedly filed with the Clerk of Court, Catawba County, NC, File #09R81 (see American Grand Jury (“AGJ”) Article); and an alleged grand jury presentment in Tennessee (see AGJ Article). To date, no official record (docket, etc.) has been located; and court personnel could not confirm the accuracy of these reports. Upon confirmation of the NC state court case, either or both of these cases, , , , we will update the chart accordingly to note such cases as pending and/or resolved. Jul 1, 2010 Update: While we did not find any official docket of this case, the subsequent prosecution of Fitzpatrick makes clear that he did, in fact, attempt to file a criminal complaint against Obama, but was rejected. See, e.g., Bill Poovey/AP, “Cases :involving attempted citizen’s arrest delayed,” as published online by the Washington Examiner (June 29, 2010).
H H H H

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 14 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket New Jersey Office of Secretary of State OAL No. STE 04588-12
46.

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Galasso v. Obama Patrick Galasso

Challenge DENIED Finding Obama is NBC Initial Decision Adopted

---

---

Unknown

Galasso v Obama, No. STE 04588-12 (N.J. Adm. Apr. 10, 2012) (initial decision rejecting challenge to Obama's 2012 nominating position and finding that, assuming Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a "natural Citation born citizen" eligible for the presidency per Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark), decision adopted as final (NJ Secy of State Apr. 12, 2012); New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Objection OVERRULED ----Unknown

47.

Garvey v. Obama Christopher Garvey

Citation New York Supreme Court – Nassau County No. 12-002764

In re Objection of Christopher Garvey, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid); petition for writ of mandamus denied, Garvey v. N.Y. Board of Elections, No. 12-002764 (N.Y. Supreme Ct., Nassau Cty, Mar. 6, 2012); Petition/Requested Order to Show Cause DENIED No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

48.

Garvey v. N.Y. Bd. of Elections Christopher Garvey

Garvey v. N.Y. Bd. of Elections, No. 12-002764 (N.Y. Supreme Ct., Nassau Cty. Mar. 6, 2012) (rejecting Citation petition for writ of mandamus and seeking show cause order, challenging New York Board of Elections rejection of plaintiff’s ballot challenge); Ohio State Court Wood Cty. Com. Pleas Ct 2008CV1024
H

DISMISSED
(SOS Report, p. 15; Docket)
H H H H

49.

Greenberg v. Brunner Carol L. Greenberg

Costs Assessed against Plaintiff
H

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation

Greenberg v. Brunner, No. 2008CV1024 (Ohio Wood County Ct. Com. Pl. Jan. 14, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility; assessing costs against plaintiff);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 15 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name
50.

Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket E.D. Cal. (Federal) 2:2012-cv-02997 Justia | RECAP Citation Alaska Division of Elections No Number Assigned Citation D. Ariz. (Federal) 2:09cv00410 Justia - RECAP
H H H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
James Grinols; Keith Judd; Thomas MacLeran; Edward Noonan; Robert Odden

Pending Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al, No. 2:2012-cv-02997 (E.D. Cal., filed Dec. 12, 2012) (complaint seeking, among other things, declaration that Obama is not eligible for Presidency and stay of various election-related events). REJECTED ----No

51.

Hackney v. Obama Patrick D. Hackney Hamblin v Obama, (Obama & McCain) Clark Hamblin

Hackney v. Obama, No Number Assigned (Alaska Div. of Elections (Gail Fenumiai, Director) May 29, 2012) (dismissing petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the 2012 ballot); DISMISSED
H

52.

9th Circuit: 09-17014 APPEAL DISMISSED

---

No
Gov. defended

Citation D. Haw. (Federal) 1:08-cv-00544-ACK-KSC Justia - RECAP Citation Alabama Jefferson CountyBirmingham Cir. Ct. No. 01-CV-2011002321.0014 Citation

Hamblin v. Obama, 2:09cv00410, 2009 WL 2513986 (D. Ariz. Aug. 14, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s and McCain’s eligibility), appeal dismissed, 09-17014 (9th Cir. Nov. 6, 2009); DISMISSED ----No
Obama not a Defendant

53.

Hamrick v. Fukino Don Hamrick

Hamrick v. Fukino, No. 1:08-cv-00544 ACK-KSC, 2009 WL 1404535 (D. Haw. May 20, 2009) (dismissing case seeking copy of Obama’s certified birth certificate to determine whether he is natural born citizen); No
Obama not a Defendant

54.

Hendershot v. Mark Kennedy Albert E. Hendershot

DISMISSED

---

---

Hendershot v. Kennedy, No. 01-CV-2011-002321.00 (Al. Jefferson Cty. Cir. Ct. Jan. 9, 2012) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot);

14

Payment required to access docket.
Page 16 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket M.D. Fla. (Federal) 3:08-cv-01164-HES-TEM Justia - RECAP
H H H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

55.

Herbert v. Obama et al Susan Herbert

DISMISSED Recommendation & Order
H H

No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation M.D. Fla. (Federal) 3:08-cv-00634-TJC-MCR Justia - RECAP

Herbert v. Obama, et al, No. 3:08-cv-01164 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 30, 2008) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is not natural born citizen); No DISMISSED
H

Herbert v. The United States et al15 Susan Herbert

---

---

H

H

H

Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation

Herbert v. US, No. 3:08-cv-00634-TJC-MCR (M.D. Fla. July 1, 2008) (dismissing case alleging, among other things, that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts violated the Constitution in refusing to accept plaintiff’s case); 11th Circuit: 0910661 APPEAL DISMISSED (sua sponte as frivolous and wholly without merit)
H H

56.

Herbert v. United States, et al Susan Herbert

M.D. Fla. (Federal) 3:08cv01201 Justia - RECAP
H H H H

DISMISSED Recommendation & Order
H H

Writ DENIED (09-6777)
H

No
Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation

Herbert v. United States, et al, No. 3:08cv01201 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2009) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is not natural born citizen), appeal dismissed, No. 09-10661 (11th Cir. Aug. 3, 2009) (dismissing appeal as frivolous and wholly without merit), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 562 (2009), reh’g denied, 130 S.Ct. 1169 (2010);

15

This case was initially listed as a birther case but upon review of the file, we have determined that it is not related to any birther claim.
Page 17 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Herbert v. James et al. Susan Herbert Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket M.D. Fla (Federal) 3:12-cv-00469-MMH-JBT Citation D.N.H. (Federal) 1:08cv00099 Justia - RECAP
H H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

57.

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Herbert v. James et al, No. 3:12-cv-00469-MMH-JBT (M.D. Fla. Apr. 30, 2012) (dismissing compliant with multiple claims, including Herbert’s “desire to vote and challenge the natural birth clause”); DISMISSED 566 F.Supp.2d 63
H

58.

Hollander v. McCain Fred Hollander

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation

Hollander v. McCain, 566 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.N.H. 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s eligibility); 09-5161 (Dismissal) DISMISSAL AFFIRMED 09-5080 (Sanctions) SANCTIONS AFFIRMED
H H H

59.

Hollister v. Soetoro Gregory S. Hollister

D.D.C. (Federal) 1:2008cv02254 Justia - RECAP
H H H H

DISMISSED Sanctions Imposed
H

Writ DENIED

Yes

(10-678)

Citation

Hollister v. Soetoro, 601 F. Supp. 2d 179 (D.D.C. 2009) (dismissing interpleader case challenging Obama’s eligibility), subsequent order, 258 F.R.D. 1 (Mar. 27, 2009) (imposing sanctions for filing claim that was not “warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law,” under Rule 11), aff’d, Nos. 09-5080 & 09-5161, 368 F. App’x. 154 (D.C. Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 1017 (2011), reh’g denied 131 S. Ct. 1627 (2011);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 18 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

60.

Kentucky Commnw. Court (Franklin County) House v. Obama et DISMISSED TBD No. 12-CI-01048 al Todd L. House House v. Obama, et al, No. 12-CI-01048 (Ky. Commonw. Ct., Oct. __, 2012) (dismissing case seeking to Citation prevent Obama from placement on 2012 general election ballot); 5th Circuit: No. 09-10246 APPEAL DISMISSED
H

61.

Hunter v. US Supreme Court, et al Darrel Reece Hunter

N.D. Tex. (Federal) 2:08cv00232 Justia - RECAP
H H H H

No --Court dismissed sua sponte

DISMISSED
H

No. 10-10009 APPEAL DISMISSED No. 10-10064 APPEAL DISMISSED
H

Citation
62.

Hunter v. U.S. Supreme Court, No. 2:08cv00232, 2009 WL 111683, (N.D. Tex., Jan. 16, 2009), (dismissing case alleging, among other things, that Obama is not eligible), appeal dismissed, No. 09-10246 (5th Cir. July 23, 2009), No. 10-10009 (Feb. 4, 2010), No. 10-100064 (Apr. 9, 2010); Disposition unknown

Irion v. Obama Van R. Irion

New Hampshire HAVA Complaint Citation Illinois Board of Elections Objection ID: 1230 | Election ID: 32 12 SOEB GP 104

63.

Jackson v. Obama Michael Jackson

Challenge OVERRULED Finding Obama is NBC (Hearing Officer Recommendation)

---

---

Unknown

Citation

Jackson v. Obama, 12 SOEB GP 104 (Ill. Bd. of Elections Hearing Officer Recommendation Jan. 27, 2012) (overruling objection to Obama’s placement on 2012 primary ballot; finding that Obama’s long form birth certificate “clearly establishes” his eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen”), objection overruled (Ill. Bd. of Elections, Feb. 3, 2012);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 19 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Ill. Bd. of Elections Objection ID: 1307 Election ID: 33
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

OVERRULED Jackson v. Obama, No. 12 SOEB GE 113 (Ill. Bd. Elections, Sept. 17, 2012) (overruling objection filed seeking to keep Obama off general election ballot in 2012 on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”; relying on prior decision (12 SOEB GP 104) which held that Obama’s long form birth certificate sufficiently established birth in the United States); DISMISSED
H

64.

Jackson v. Obama Michael D. Jackson

Citation Pennsylvania Commw. Court 184 MD 2008 Citation C.D. Cal. (Federal) 2:10-cv-01075 Justia - RECAP Citation Wash. Super. Ct. Thurston County No. 12-2-01763-5 Citation

65.

In re John McCain’s Ineligibility to be on Presidential Primary Ballot in Pa. Carmon Elliott

DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

In re McCain’s Ineligibility to Be on Presidential Primary Ballot in Pa., No. 184 MD 2008 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Mar. 13, 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s eligibility), aff’d, 944 A.2d 75 (Pa. 2008); No
Gov. defended

66.

Jones v. Obama Ruth Jones

DISMISSED

---

---

Jones v. Obama, No. 2:10-cv-01075 (C.D. Cal. July 20, 2010) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility); DISMISSED No. 878374 Motion for Accelerated Review DENIED (9/25) No
Obama not a Defendant

DISMISSED

67.

Jordan v. Reed Linda Jordan

Jordan v. Secretary of State Sam Reed, No. 12-2-01763-5, 2012 WL 4739216 (Wash. Super. Ct. Aug. 27, 2012) (dismissing as frivolous plaintiff’s complaint seeking to prevent state from including Obama on 2012 ballot);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 20 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket C.D. Cal. (Federal) No. 2:2011-cv-05440 RECAP | PACER Citation E.D. Kentucky (Federal) No. 3:11-cv-00027-DCR RECAP | PACER
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

68.

Judd v. State Sec’y of State of California et al16 Keith Russell Judd

RELIEF DENIED Judd v. Cal. Secy of State et al, No. 2:2011-cv-05440 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds; referring to arguments as “insubstantial or frivolous”); RELIEF DENIED No
Obama not a Defendant

69.

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Kentucky Keith Russell Judd

Citation E.D. Va. (Federal) No. 1:11-cv-00618 RECAP | PACER

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Kentucky, No. 3:11-cv-00027-DCR (E.D. Ky. Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds; stating that “[a] cursory review of this document indicates that it is yet another frivolous filing from the plaintiff); RELIEF DENIED No
Obama not a Defendant

70.

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al Keith Russell Judd

Citation

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al, No. 1:11-cv-00618 (E.D. Va. 2011 Aug. 8, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds; finding that “Plaintiff’s Motion to remove President Barack Obama from the 2012 ballot and to award all delegates to plaintiff, which is predicted on allegations that Obama was not born in the United States and is not a United States citizen, will be denied as frivolous”);

Judd has filed more than 50 election cases and, in August 2012, filed motions for relief from prior judgments in which he alleged that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” and sought to remove Obama from 2012 election ballot. We did not include all these cases in the scorecard because the vast majority of them were summarily dismissed given that Judd has been declared a vexatious litigant. For a complete listing of the Judd cases, however, see below.
16

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 21 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket C.D. Cal.
71.

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

No DISMISSED
H

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd Orly Taitz17

No. 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN

RECAP

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd et al v. Obama et al, No. 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2012) (dismissing lawsuit Citation purportedly removed by plaintiffs from state court case, Taitz v. Obama, No. 30-2012 00582135, to federal court); C.D. Cal.
No. 8:12-cv-01888-DOC-AN RECAP

72.

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd Orly Taitz18

DISMISSED

TBD

Judd et al v. Obama et al, No. 8:12-cv-01888-DOC-AN (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2012) (dismissing lawsuit Citation stating election fraud, RICO, and various other claims seeking to prevent Obama from being on 2012 general election ballot (among other things); D. Nev. (Federal) 2:08cv01162 Justia - RECAP
H H H H

73.

Judy v. McCain Cody Robert Judy

DISMISSED

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation Hawaii State Circuit Court 1CC09-1-000783 Citation

Judy v. McCain, No. 2:08cv01162 (D. Nev., Sept. 8, 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s eligibility); DISMISSED DISMISSAL AFFIRMED19 --No
Obama not a Defendant

74.

Justice v. Fuddy Dr. Robert V. Justice

Justice v. Fuddy, No. 1CC09-1-000783 (Haw. Cir. Ct. Oct. 9, 2009) (dismissing case seeking access to records allegedly relevant to Obama’s eligibility), aff’d 253 P.3d 665 (Haw. Ct. App. 2011), as corrected (Apr. 26, 2011);

17 18 19

Additional parties include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas G MacLeran, Larry Rappaport, Carol Vita, Lucien Vita. Additional parties include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas G MacLeran, Larry Rappaport, Carol Vita, Lucien Vita. Note: Corrections to April 7, 2011 Opinion, issued on April 26, 2011 found here.
Page 22 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

75.

Kerchner et al v. Obama et al Charles F. Kerchner

D.N.J. (Federal) 1:09-cv-00253-JBS-JS Justia - RECAP
H H H H

DISMISSED

3rd Circuit: 09-4209 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Costs taxed against Kerchner Show Cause (Sanctions) Order Issued
H

Writ DENIED (10-446)

No
Gov. defended

Citation
76.

Kerchner v. Obama, 669 F. Supp. 2d 477 (D.N.J. 2009) aff’d, 612 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 663 (2010); DISMISSED
H

Kerchner et al v. Obama et al Charles F. Kerchner Dale A. Laudenslager

Pennsylvania State Commonwealth Court No. 85 MD 2012 Citation Indiana Election Commission No. 2012-162 Citation

Yes

Kerchner v. Obama, No. 85 MD 2012 (Pa. Commw. Ct., Mar. 2, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot); --Challenge DENIED
But see Taitz v. Indiana Election Commission, below

77.

Kesler v. Obama Edward R. Kesler

---

Unknown

Kesler v. Obama, No. 2012-162 (Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”); CA Court of Appeals C06232 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED CA Supreme Court S188724 Petition for Review DENIED

78.

Keyes v. Bowen Alan Keyes

CA State Court Sacramento Cty Sup. Ct Court 34-2008-80000096CUWMGDS
H

DISMISSED Costs Assessed against Plaintiff
H

Writ DENIED (10-1351)

Yes

Citation
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Keyes v. Bowen, 189 Cal. App. 4th 647 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) (affirming dismissal of case challenging Obama’s eligibility), pet. for rev. denied, No. S188724 (Cal. Feb. 2, 2011), cert denied, 132 S. Ct. 99 (2011);
Page 23 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket US Army Administrative Law Division No Number Assigned Citation
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

79.

Lakin Article 138 Complaint Terrence Lakin

Article 138 Complaint REJECTED

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Lakin Complaint of Wrongs under Article 138, No Number Assigned (US Army Admin. Law Div. Dec 11, 2009); Not applicable (petition filed in appeals court) --No
Obama not a Defendant

80.

Lakin v. Lind Terrence Lakin

US Army Court of Criminal Petition for Writ of Mandamus Appeals DENIED No. ARMY MISC 20100778 Citation UCMJ Investigation MCAT-JA-SC Citation

Lakin v. Lind, No. ARMY MISC 20100778 (A. Ct. Crim. App. Oct. 12, 2010) (order) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to compel discovery factual matters allegedly relating to Obama’s eligibility in court martial proceedings); Court Martial: GUILTY ----No
Obama not a Defendant

81.

US v. LTC Terrence L. Lakin Terrence Lakin

United States v. Lakin, No. 20100995 (Mil. Dist. of Wash. DC Dec. 16, 2010) (court martial finding Lakin guilty of, among other things, failure to report to deploy; rejecting claim that his failure was based on legitimate questions as to Obama’s eligibility), appeal withdrawn, (A. Ct. Crim. App. July 28, 2011)

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 24 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket New York Court of Claims No. 2012-039-319 Claim No. 120982-81370 Citation Lamb v. Obama et al Thomas A. Lamb Alaska Superior Court No. 3AN-12-09961CI Citation
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

82.

Laity v. State of New York

DISMISSED Laity v. State of New York, No. 2012-039-319, Claim No. 120982-81370 (dismissing claim brought against Board of Elections for rejecting plaintiff’s objections to placement of Obama on 2012 ballot) Pending Lamb v. Obama et al, No. 3AN-12-09961CI (Alaska Super. Ct. filed Sept. 25, 2012) (complaint seeking, among other things, court order to release various records of Presidential candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney for purported purpose of proving eligibility to be President)
9th Circuit No. 12-16729 Voluntarily DISMISSED Motions for Injunction DENIED

83.

84.

Liberty Legal Found. v. Nat’l Democratic Party of USA, et al
John Dummett; Leonard Volodarsky; Creg Maroney

D. Ariz. (Federal) 2:11-cv-02089-SRB Justia - RECAP

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation

Liberty Legal Found. v. Nat’l Democratic Party of the USA, et al, No. 2:11-cv-02089-SRB (D Ariz. Jul. 11, 2011) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from being on 2012 ballot; warning plaintiff’s attorney that knowingly continuing to bring claims that have previously been dismissed may warrant sanctions in the future”);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 25 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket W.D. Tenn. Federal Court 2:12-cv-02143-STA-cgc
Justia - RECAP
85.

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

20

DISMISSED Sanctions GRANTED

6th Cir. Ct. of Appeals No. 12-6082 Appeal DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Liberty Legal Found. v. Nat’l Democratic Party of USA, et al
John Dummett; Leonard Volodarsky; Creg Maroney

Citation

Liberty Legal Found., v. Nat’l Democratic Party of the USA, et al, No. 2:12-cv-2143, 2012 WL 2368448 (W.D. Tenn. Jun. 21, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from being on 2012 ballot); see also --- F. Supp. 2d ---, 2012 WL 1252484 (W.D. Tenn. Apr. 13, 2012) (denying motion to remand because issue of “natural born citizen” interpretation is a federal issue); 2012 WL 3683492 (Aug. 24, 2012) (granting sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927: finding that “[C]ounsel for Plaintiff reasonably should have known that all Plaintiffs lacked standing to bring this suit, the Court holds that Plaintiffs' claims were frivolous and without any arguable basis in law. As such, counsel for Plaintiff has multiplied the proceedings in this case unreasonably and vexatiously and should therefore be required to satisfy personally the attorneys' fees reasonably incurred by Defendants because of such conduct.”), 2012 WL 6026856 (Dec. 4, 2012) (granting in part petition for attorneys fees); 2012 WL 6026496 (Dec. 4, 2012) (denying motion to reconsider order granting §1927 sanctions);
Action filed in Supreme Court

86.

Lightfoot v. Bowen Gail Lightfoot

CA Supreme Court No. 168690
H

DISMISSED

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

Application DENIED (08A524)
H

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation M.D. Tenn. Federal Court No. 3:12-mc-00048; 3:12cv-00910

Lightfoot v. Bowen, No. S168690 (Cal. Dec. 5, 2008) (dismissing petition for writ of mandate and stay), application for stay denied, 129 S. Ct. 1053 No. 08A524 (Jan. 26, 2009); DISMISSED

87.

Maathai v. Obama Wangari Muta Maathi

Maathai v. Obama, No. 3:12-cv-00910 (M.D. Tenn., Sept. 4, 2012) (dismissing purported whistleblower Citation case seeking ouster of President Obama on grounds that he does not qualify as “natural born citizen” due to alleged Kenyan birth and fact that he did not have two US citizen parents at birth);

20

Case removed from TN State Court - Chancery Court –Shelby - No. CH-11-1757 | Docket.
Page 26 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

88.

Mackay v. Obama Donald Francis Mackay, Jr.

E.D. Pa. (Federal Court) No. 2:11-cv-05458-JP Justia - RECAP

DISMISSED

3rd Circuit: No. 11-3862 Voluntarily DISMISSED 3rd Circuit: No. 11-3967 DISMISSED

---

No
Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation WA State Court
89.

Mackay v. Obama, No. 2:11-CV-05458-JP (E.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2011) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility), appeal voluntarily dismissed, No. 11- 3862 (3rd Cir. Nov. 2, 2011), appeal dismissed, No 113967 (Dec. 8, 2011); DISMISSED ----No
Obama not a Defendant

Marquis v. Reed Steven Marquis

King County Superior Ct.

08-2-34955-1 SEA Citation Hawaii Supreme Court 29414
H

Marquis v. Reed, No. 08-2-34955-1 SEA (Wash. King County Super. Ct. Oct. 27, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility);
Action filed in Supreme Court

90.

Martin v Lingle Andy Martin

APPLICATION DENIED

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation Hawaii State District Court 1CC08-1-002147

Martin v. Lingle, No. 29414, 2008 WL 4684786 (Haw. Oct. 22, 2008) (rejecting petition seeking disclosure of Obama’s birth records allegedly related to his eligibility); Haw. Ct. Appeals APPEAL DISMISSED (Docket) Haw. Sup. Ct. Writ DENIED
H H

DISMISSED (Docket)
H H

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

91.

Martin v Lingle Andy Martin

Citation

Martin v. Lingle, No. 1CC08-1-002147 (Haw. Cir. Ct. Jan. 12, 2009) (dismissing case seeking to compel disclosure of Obama’s birth records based on challenge to his eligibility), recons. denied, (Jan. 27, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. 29643, 2009 WL 1669050 (Haw. Ct. App. June 9, 2009), cert. denied, No. 29643, 2009 WL 2372096 (Haw. Aug. 3, 2009);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 27 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Hawaii State District Court 1CC10-1-00096921 Citation Ill. Bd. of Elections Objection ID: 1305 Election ID: 33
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

92.

Martin v. Bennett Andy Martin

DISMISSED (Docket)22

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Martin v. Bennett, No. 1CC10-1-000969 (Haw. Cir. Ct. Sept. 7, 2010) (dismissing case seeking to compel disclosure of Obama’s birth records based on challenge to his eligibility); OVERRULED ----No
Obama not a Defendant

93.

Martin v. Obama Amanda Martin

Citation

Martin v. Obama, No. 12 SOEB GE 111 (Ill. Bd. Elections, Sept. 17, 2012) (overruling objection filed seeking to keep Obama off general election ballot in 2012 on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”; relying on prior decision in Freeman and Jackson primary challenges (12 SOEB GP 103 and 12 SOEB GP 104), which held that Obama’s long form birth certificate sufficiently established birth in the United States); DENIED Not Applicable (Filed in State Supreme Court) -----

94.

McInnish v. Chapman Hugh McInnish

Alabama Supreme Court No. 1110664 Citation Alabama Superior Court (Montgomery County) No. 3-CV-2012-001053 Citation

Mcinnish v. Chapman, No. 1110665 (Ala. Mar. 27, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to require secretary of state to order Obama to produce original birth certificate); DISMISSED Mcinnish v. Chapman, No. 03-CV-2012-001053(Al. Cir. Ct. Dec. 7, 2012) (granting motion to dismiss complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot);

95.

McInnish v. Chapman Hugh McInnish

21 22

Actual case cannot be bookmarked, but can be located via search from this link. Actual order cannot be bookmarked, but can be located in “case info” after searching for case from this link.
Page 28 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket E.D. Wash. (Federal) 2:11-cv-00374-EFS Justia - RECAP Citation Illinois 22nd Judicial Dist. McHenry County, IL, Case No 09mr399 Citation Ill. Bd. of Elections Objection ID: 1242 | Election ID: 32 Citation Kansas. Bd. Elections No. ___________
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

No DISMISSED ----Court dismissed sua sponte

96.

McLanahan v. Obama Tim McLanahan

McLanahan v. Obama, No. 2:11-CV-00374-EFS (E.D. Wash. Oct. 13, 2011) (dismissing complaint challenging, among other things, Obama’s eligibility); No
Obama not a Defendant

97.

Meroni et al v. McHenry County Grand Jury Foreman et al. Sharon A. Meroni Meroni et al v. Obama Sharon Meroni, Chris Cleveland, and Stephen Boulton Montgomery v. Obama Joe Montgomery

DENIED

---

---

Meroni v. McHenry Cty. Grand Jury Foreman, No. 09mr339 (Ill. Cir. Ct. (22nd Dist.) Jan. 20, 2010) (dismissing case seeking to compel grand jury investigation into Obama’s eligibility); Voluntarily Withdrawn But still OVERRULED -----

98.

Meroni et al v. Obama, 12 SOEB GP 104 (Ill. Bd. of Elections Hearing Officer Recommendation Jan. 27, 2012) (Obama’s birth certificate “clearly establishes” his eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen”), objection overruled (Ill. State Bd. of Elections, Feb. 3, 2012); Voluntarily Withdrawn Yes

99.

Citation S.D. Fla. (Federal) 1:08-cv-22345 Justia - RECAP

Montgomery v. Obama, No. _______ (Kansas Bd. Of Elections, Sept __, 2012) (ballot challenge seeking to keep Obama of 2012 general election ballot on grounds he is not “natural born citizen”) DISMISSED
H

100.

Morrow v. Obama Susan A. Morrow

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

H

H

H

Citation

Morrow v. Barak Humane Obama, No. 1:08-cv-22345 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2009) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 29 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Ohio State Court Warren Cty. Com. Pleas Ct 2008CV72726
H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

101.

Neal v. Brunner David M. Neal

DISMISSED (SOS Report, p. 15; Docket)
H H H H

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation E.D. Mich. (Federal) 2:08-cv-15243 Justia - RECAP

Neal v. Brunner, No. 2008CV72726 (Ohio Ct. Com. Pl. Warren County Nov. 17, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility); DISMISSED Sua Sponte
H

No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

102.

Neely v. Obama Gerald Lee Neely

H

H

H

Citation
103.

Neely v. Obama, 2:08-cv-15243 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 4, 2009) (dismissing case challenging, among other things, Obama’s eligibility); Writ of Mandate DISMISSED
Yes

Noonan et al v. Bowen & Obama
Edward C. Noonan, Pamela Barnett, Sharon Chickering, George Miller, Tony Dolz, Neil Turner, Gary Wilmott

Superior Court of Ca. Sacramento County 2012-80001048 Citation

Noonan v. Bowen et al, No. 2012-80001048 (Cal. Sacramento Cty. Super. Ct., July 5, 2012) (dismissing case seeking to challenge Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot); N/A – originally filed in CA Supreme Court Application for Stay No. 12A606 DENIED by Justice Kennedy

104.

Noonan et al v. Bowen
Edward Noonan Thomas MacLeran Keith Judd Orly Taitz

California Supreme Court No. S207078

PETITION DENIED

Citation

Noonan et al v. Bowen, No. S207078 (Cal. Dec. 6, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandate/prohibition challenging 2012 election of Obama as President) ;

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 30 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Vermont Superior Court Washington County No. 611-8-12 Wncv Paige v. Obama H. Brooke Paige Citation

Pending Motion for TRO DENIED Finding Obama is NBC DISMISSED Finding Obama is NBC

Yes

105.

Paige v. Obama, No. 611-8-12 WNCV (Vt. Superior Ct., Nov. 14, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from being placed in 2012 general election ballot; relying in Ankeny ( 916 N.E.2d 678) to find that persons born in U.S. is “are 'natural born Citizens' for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents); see also Order Denying Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Sept. 21, 2012) (“[t]he common law of England, the American colonies, and later the United States, all support one interpretation only: "that persons born within the borders of the United States are 'natural born Citizens' for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents”) ( citing Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678, 688 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010). No
Obama not a Defendant

106.

Patriot’s Heart Media Network v. Illinois Board of Elections Sharon Meroni

Illinois State Court, McHenry County No. 10CH000605 Docket Citation D.D.C. (Federal) 1:09-mc-00442-RCL Justia - RECAP
H H H H

DISMISSED

---

---

Patriot’s Heart Media Network v. Ill. Bd. of Elections, No. 10CH000605 (Ill. McHenry Cty. Chancery. Ct. Mar. 8, 2010) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on ballot); No DISMISSED ----Court dismissed sua sponte

107.

Patriot’s Heart Network v Soetoro Sharon Meroni

Citation

Patriot’s Heart Media Network, Inc. v. Soetoro, No. 1:09-mc-00442-RCL (D.D.C. Sept. 10, 2009) (rejecting request to convene grand jury to investigate Obama’s eligibility; dismissing petition for lack of jurisdiction);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 31 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

3rd Circuit
108.

In re Paul Andrew Mitchell 23 Paul Andrew Mitchell
F

E.D. Pa. (Federal) 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Justia - RECAP
H H H

Writ of Mandamus (08-4443) (Original Proceeding)

Writ DENIED
H

Not applicable (original proceeding in 3rd Cir.)

No --Court dismissed sua sponte

304 Fed.Appx. 113, 2008 WL 5381436

Citation Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1216823-60-MALIHI Citation

In Re Paul Andrew Mitchell, 304 F. App’x. 113 (3rd Cir., Dec. 22, 2008) (denying petition for writ of mandamus regarding challenge to Obama’s eligibility); Objection DENIED - Obama Eligible (ALJ) Finding Obama is NBC Secretary of State Final Decision Finding Obama is NBC (Adopting ALJ Decision)

109.

Powell v. Obama Kevin Richard Powell

See below

See below

Powell v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1216823-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012); Ga. Supreme Court. No. S12D1077 DENIED Emergency Motion for Injunction DENIED

Powell v. Obama Kevin Richard Powell

Georgia Fulton County Superior Ct 2012CV211528

Appeal of SOS Decision DISMISSED

---

Yes in trial court No in GA. Sup. Ct

Citation

Powell v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1216823-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012), appeal dismissed, No. 2012CV211528 (Ga. Fulton Cty. Super. Ct., Mar. 2, 2012), motion for injunction denied, No. S12D1077 (Ga. Mar. 13, 2012), appeal denied (Ga. Apr. 4, 2012);

23

Note: Paul Andrew Mitchell has sought to intervene in multiple birther cases of which this is just one. Because he filed “substantive” briefs with this case/appeal, it is included as a separate case.
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 32 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

110.

Purpura v. Sebelius24 Nicholas E. Purpura, Donald R Laster Jr

D.N.J. (Federal) 3:10-cv-04814-FLW-DEA Justia - RECAP

DISMISSED

No. 11-2303 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Costs Taxed against Appellants

No. 11-7275 Writ DENIED Petition for Reh’g DENIED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation

Purpura v. Sebelius, No. 3:10-CV-04814, 2011 WL 1547768, (D. N.J. Apr. 21, 2011) (dismissing case challenging Patient Protection and Affordable Care on various grounds, including that was not signed into law by a person eligible to be President of the United States), aff’d, 446 F. App’x 496 (3d Cir. 2011) cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1037 (U.S. 2012) reh’g denied, No. 11-7275, 2012 WL 538800 (U.S. Feb. 21, 2012); Challenge DENIED Finding Obama is NBC Initial Decision Adopted

111.

Purpura et al v. Obama Nicholas E. Purpura Theodore T.Moran

New Jersey Office of Secretary of State OAL No. STE 04534-12

See below

---

Yes

Citation

Purpura v Obama, No. STE 04534-12, 2012 WL 1369003 (N.J. Adm. Apr. 10, 2012) (initial decision rejecting challenge to Obama's 2012 nominating position and finding that, assuming Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a "natural born citizen" eligible for the presidency per Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark), decision adopted as final (NJ Secy of State Apr. 12, 2012), aff’d, No. A-004478-11-T03, 2012 WL 1949041 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 31, 2012) (per curiam).

24

Note: This case challenges the Patients Affordable Health Care Act on multiple grounds, including the charge that because Obama is not a “natural born citizen” his signing of the bill into law violated the Constitution.
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 33 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Purpura et al v. Obama
Nicholas E. Purpura Theodore T. Moran

N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. No. A-004478-11-T03

AFFIRMED Finding Obama is NBC25

Petition for Cert DENIED N.J. Sup. Ct. No. 071052

---

TBD

Citation D. Mass (Federal) No. 1:12-cv-11492 Justia | RECAP

Purpura v Obama, No. A-004478-11-T03, 2012 WL 1949041 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 31, 2012) (per curiam) (affirming N.J. Secy of State decision rejecting ballot challenge to Obama's 2012 nominating position and finding that, assuming Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a "natural born citizen" eligible for the presidency per Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark), cert denied, No. 071052 (N.J. Sept. 7, 2012); DISMISSED 1st Cir. No. 12-2406 Pending No
Obama not a defendants

112.

Reade v. Galvin William F. Reade

Citation W.D. Tex. (Federal) 5:09-cv-00703-XR Justia - RECAP

Reade v. Galvin, No. 1:12-cv-11492, 2012 WL 5385683 (D. Mass. Oct. 30, 2012) (dismissing complaint filed against Massachusetts Secretary of State for allegedly refusing to consider plaintiff’s challenge to Obama’s eligibility to be included on 2012 primary ballot; finding that Reade does not have standing to challenge eligibility in court); TRO DENIED; DISMISSED
H H H

No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

113.

Rhodes v. Gates Connie Rhodes

H

H

H

Citation

Rhodes v. Gates, 5:09-cv-00703-XR (W.D.Tex., Aug. 28, 2009) (denying TRO seeking to stay military orders due to challenge to Obama’s eligibility);

25

The Appellate Court affirmed the Secretary of State’s Decision: “We affirm substantially for the reasons set forthin ALJ Jeff S. Masin's thorough and thoughtful written opinion of April 10, 2012, as adopted by the Secretary on April 12,2012.”
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 34 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

TRO DENIED & CASE DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED
H H

--11th Circuit Appeal of Sanctions Only Sanctions AFFIRMED Petition for Rehearing DENIED

--Application (10A56) DENIED Writ DENIED (10541) No
Gov. defended

M.D. Ga. (Federal) 4:09-cv-00106-CDL Justia - RECAP
H H H

114.

Rhodes v. MacDonald Connie Rhodes
H

Sanctions Imposed Final Sanctions Order 670 F.Supp.2d 1363
H

Citation

Rhodes v. MacDonald, No. 409-CV-106CDL, 2009 WL 2997605 (M.D. Ga. Sept. 16, 2009) (denying TRO seeking to stay military orders due to challenge to Obama’s eligibility; criticizing complaint as frivolous), recons. denied, 2009 WL 3111834 (Sept. 18, 2009), subsequent order, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (M.D. Ga. 2009) (imposing $20,000 sanction for violating Rule 11), aff’d, 368 Fed.Appx. 949, (11th Cir. 2010), reh’g denied, No. 09-15418-BB (11th Cir. May 14, 2010), app. for stay denied, 131 S.Ct. 44 (2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 918 (2011); DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

115.

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Alabama Annamarie Riethmiller26

M.D. Ala. (Federal Court) No. 2:12-cv-00823-SRW PACER| RECAP

Citation

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Alabama, 2012 WL 5042026 (M.D. Ala. Oct. 2, 2012) report and recommendation adopted, 2:12-CV-823-WKW, 2012 WL 5045219 (M.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2012) (dismissing claim seeking, among other things, injunction preventing defendants from placing candidate Obama on the ballot for the November 2012 election and declaration that Obama is ineligible to hold office of President as he is not a “natural born” citizen);

26

Multiple cases remain pending. For a complete list of the Riethmiller cases located to date, see below.
Page 35 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D. Ariz. (Federal Court) No. 2:2012-cv-02034 PACER | RECAP
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

116.

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Arizona Annamarie Riethmiller

Citation

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Arizona, No. 2:2012-cv-02034 (D. Ariz., Sept. 29, 2012) (order denying declaratory judgment and complaint “seeking to enjoin the electors for the state of Arizona from casting a vote for President Obama because he is not a natural born citizen” on grounds that complaint fails to meet FRCP Rule 8; granting plaintiff 30 days to file amended complaint); see also 2012 WL 5416603 (D.

Ariz. Nov. 6, 2012) (order dismissing amended complaint);
D. Del.
117.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Delaware Annamarie Riethmiller

No. 1:12cv1197-UNA RECAP | PACER

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v.. Electors for the State of Delaware, No.
Citation 1:12cv1197-UNA (D. Del., Oct. 9, 2012) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”).

118.

C.D. Ill. (Federal Court) Annamarie Last No No. 1:12-cv-01373-JES-JAG DISMISSED Name Uncertain Obama not a Defendant PACER | RECAP [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Reithmiller) v. Electors for State of Illinois, No. 1:12-cv-01373-JES-JAG Illinois (C.D. Ill. Oct. 1, 2012) (dismissing and finding that birther-related complaint “is frivolous, fails to state a Citation Annamarie legal claim over which this Court would have proper jurisdiction, and fails to even minimally comply with Riethmiller27 [FRCP 8]”);

27

For more information on the Riethmiller cases, see below.
Page 36 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket N.D. Ind. (Federal) No. 1:2012-cv-00335 PACER | RECAP
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

119.

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Indiana Annamarie Riethmiller

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation W.D. La (Federal) No. 3:12CV-602-H PACER | RECAP

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Indiana, No.1:2012-cv-00335 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 24, 2012) (order sua sponte dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), frivolous complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen” and imposing filing restrictions on plaintiff for filing frivolous actions); DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

120.

Annamarie [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Kentucky Annamarie Riethmiller

Citation M.D. La. (Federal) No. 1:2012-cv-601 PACER | RECAP Citation D. Me. (Federal Court) No. 1-12-cv-00293-DBH PACER | RECAP

Annamarie ? Last Name Uncertain v. Electors for Kentucky, 3:12-cv--602-H, 2012 WL 5398565 (W.D. La. Nov. 5, 2012) (relying on Berg v. Obama, 586 F.3d 234, 239 (3d Cir. 2009) to dismiss complaint on standing grounds, which sought (among other things) to prevent Obama’s placement on 2012 general election ballot); DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

121.

Annamarie [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Louisiana Annamarie Riethmiller Annamarie Last Name Uncertain [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Maine Annamarie Riethmiller

Annamarie v. Electors ex rel. Louisiana, 1:2012-cv-601-BAJ, 2012 WL 5878153 (M.D. La. Oct. 15, 2012) (recommending dismissal of complaint which included birther claims, as “both fanciful and delusional,” which “fail as a matter of law”) Order Adopting Recommendations and Dismissing Case (Nov. 21, 2012) DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

122.

Citation

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain v Electors for the State of Maine, No. 1-12-cv-00293-DBH (D. Me. Sep 27, 2012) (magistrate recommendation to dismiss case sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B) because the action is frivolous and fails to state a claim ) Sept. 27, 2012 (order adopting recommendation and dismissing case with prejudice).

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 37 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name
123.

Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D. Me. (Federal Court) No. 1-12-cv-00293-DBH RECAP | PACER
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Michigan Annamarie Riethmiller Annamarie Last Name Uncertain [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Mississippi Annamarie Riethmiller

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation S.D. Miss. (Federal Court) No. 3:12-cv-00671 RECAP | PACER Citation

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of Michigan No. 1:2012-cv-01043 (W.D. Mich., Oct. 12, 2012) ((Oct. 12, 2012) (magistrate report and recommendation that complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen” be dismissed), Order Dismissing Case (Nov. 1, 2012); DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

124.

[Reithmiller] Annamarie LNU v. Electors for State of Mississippi, No. 3:12-cv-00671-TSL-MTP (S.D. Miss. Oct. 10, 2012) (magistrate’s order recommending dismissal of birther compliant), Order (Oct. 30. 2012) adopting recommendation and dismissing case as frivolous);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 38 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name
125.

Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket E.D. Mo. (Federal Court) No. 4:12-cv-01739-CAS RECAP | PACER; Citation D. Mont. (Federal Court) No. 9:12-cv-00164
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Missouri Annamarie Riethmiller Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Montana Annamarie Riethmiller

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Missouri, No. 4:12-cv-01739-CAS (E.D. Mo. Sept. 27, 2012) (sua sponte and summarily dismissing, as frivolous, case seeking, among other things, declaration that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” and finding that appeal could not be taken in good faith) DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

126.

RECAP | PACER
Citation D. Neb. (Federal Court) No. 8:12-cv-00348 RECAP | PACER

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain v. Electors ex rel. Montana, No. 9:12-cv-00164-DLC-JCL, 2012 WL 5879607 (D. Mont. Oct. 17, 2012) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen,” as frivolous). DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

127.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Nebraska Annamarie Riethmiller

Citation

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of Nebraska , No. 8:12-cv-00348RGK-PRSE, 2012 WL 5874371 (D. Neb., docketed Sept. 27, 2012) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency; “The 52-page Complaint submitted by Plaintiff consists of, at best, nonsensical and rambling statements regarding President Barack Obama’s citizenship and his eligibility to be President of the United States on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”)

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 39 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket W.D.N.Y. No. 1:12cv906-RJA RECAP | PACER;
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

128.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of New York Annamarie Riethmiller

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation N.D. Ohio

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of New York, No. 1:12cv906-RJA (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2012) (order sua sponte and summarily dismissing, as frivolous, complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”; finding that appeal cannot be taken in good faith) ; No
Obama not a Defendant

129.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Ohio Annamarie Riethmiller

No. 5:2012-mc-00122 RECAP | PACER

DISMISSED

Citation E.D. Pa. (Federal Court)

Last Name Uncertain v. Electors for Ohio, No. 5:2012-mc-00122, 2012 WL 5304734 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 25, 2012) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”); DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

130.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Pennsylvania Annamarie Riethmiller

No. 2:12-cv-05767-ER
RECAP | PACER

Citation W.D. Va. (Federal Court)

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of Pennsylvania, No. 2:12-cv05767-ER (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2012) (“The complaint, which asserts that President Obama is not a suitable presidential candidate and seeks his removal from the ballot in the 2012 presidential election, is dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)”);

131.

Annamarie LNU No. 1:12-cv-00058-JPJ-PMS No DISMISSED [Riethmiller] v. Obama not a Defendant PACER | RECAP Electors for State of Virginia Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of Virginia, No. 1:12-cv-00058-JPJAnnamarie PMS, 2012 WL 4742363 (W.D. Va. Oct 4, 2012) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility for the Riethmiller Citation

presidency as frivolous and finding that plaintiff lacks standing);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 40 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name
132.

Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket E.D. Washington (Federal) No. 2:12-cv-00548-TOR RECAP | PACER. Citation W.D. Wis. (Federal Court) No. 1:12-cv-00977-WCG PACER | RECAP Citation Indiana Election Commission No. 2012-163
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Washington Annamarie Riethmiller Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Wisconsin Annamarie Riethmiller

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Riethmiller v Electors for the State of Washington, No. 2:12-cv-00548-TOR (E.D. Wash. Sept. 26, 2012) (sua sponte order dismissing birther complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)); No
Obama not a Defendant

133.

DISMISSED

Annamarie LNU v. Electors for the State of Wisconsin, No. 1:12-cv-00977-WCG (E.D. Wis. Sept. 27, 2012) (sua sponte dismissing, for failure to comply with FRCP 8, complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”); --Challenge DENIED
But see Taitz v. Indiana Election Commission, below

134.

Ripley v. Obama Valeria I. Ripley

---

No

Citation
135.

Ripley v. Obama, No. 2012-163 (Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”); DISMISSED
H

Robinson v. Bowen (McCain) Markham Robinson

N.D. Cal. (Federal) 3:08cv03836 Justia - RECAP
H H H

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation

Robinson v. Bowen, 567 F. Supp. 2d 1144 (N.D. Cal. 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s eligibility);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 41 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name
136.

Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket W.D. Wash. (Federal) 2:08cv01519 Justia - RECAP
H H H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Roy v. Fed. Election Comm., (Obama & McCain) Kamal K. Roy 28
F

DISMISSED
Recommendation & Order
H H

No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation South Dakota Board of Elections Citation Pennsylvania Supreme Court 199 MM 2008

Roy v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 2:08cv01519, 2008 WL 4921263 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 14, 2008) (dismissing case challenging eligibility of Obama and McCain);
OBJECTION DISMISSED

137.

Scheveck v. Obama Thomas Scheveck

---

---

Unknown

Scheveck v. Obama, No Number Assigned (S.D. Bd. of Elections May 11, 2011) (dismissing HAVA complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to appear on ballot);
N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

Action filed in Supreme Court

Application DENIED
H

138.

Schneller v. Cortes James D. Schneller

Application (08A592) DENIED No Writ (08-9797) Obama not a Defendant DISMISSED with comments
H H H

Citation

Schneller v. Cortes, No. 199 MM 2008 (Pa. Jan. 8, 2009) (denying emergency application challenging Obama’s eligibility), pet. for cert. dismissed, 129 S. Ct. 2830 (2009) (finding that Schneller has “repeatedly abused this Court's process” and directing Clerk to reject any further petitions in noncriminal matters from Schneller unless he docketing fee is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Court rules); DISMISSED DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED
See Note in 212 MD 2012

139.

Schneller v. Obama et al James D. Schneller

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 75 MD 2012

---

Yes

Schneller v. Obama, No. 75 MD 2012 (Pa. Commw. Ct., Mar. 2. 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Citation Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot), appeal dismissed, No. 24 MAP 2012 (Pa. Mar. 23, 2012), recons. denied (Pa. Apr. 26, 2012).

28

Note: Kamal Kama Roy has filed well over a dozen lawsuits, many naming Obama. Although the pleadings are utterly unintelligible, at least a few of his pleadings have included references to various birther claims. The courts always dismiss these cases, typically sua sponte, a frivolous and unintelligible, shortly after he files them.
H H

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 42 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 212 MD 2012
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

DISMISSED

140.

Schneller v. Corbett, et al James D. Schneller

Pending PA S. Ct. 55 MAP 2012

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation

Schneller v. Corbett et al, No. 212 MD 201 (Pa. Commw. Ct., May 25, 2012) (dismissing multiple claims relating to “natural born citizen” issue, including purported “quo warranto” action on grounds that Obama is ineligible to be President and action to compel state election board to hold hearing on Obama’s eligibility), appeal docketed , No. 55 MAP 2012 (Pa., filed June 4, 2012). Petition for Writ of Mandamus No. 12-5040 DENIED Dismissal AFFIRMED No. 12-5198 Petition for Writ of Certiorari No. 11-1185 DENIED No
Government Defended

D.D.C. (Federal) 1:12-cv-00001-JDB Justia - RECAP
141.

DISMISSED

ex rel Sibley v. Obama Montgomery Blair Sibley (Quo Warranto) Citation

Sibley v. Obama, 866 F.Supp.2d 17 (D.D.C. Jun. 6, 2012) (dismissing complaint containing, among other things, a “petition for writs “quo warranto” to remove President Obama from his current office and, also or alternatively, to bar him from running for the office of president again in the upcoming November election”), affirmed per curiam No. 12-5198 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 6, 2012) (granting summary affirmance and stating that Sibley’s claims are without merit). See also Sibley v. Obama, No. 12-5040 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 6, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to compel district court to rule on complaint and various motions), reh’g and reh’g en bank denied (May 4, 2012), cert denied No. 11-1185 (U.S. Jun. 4, 2012);

142.

Sibley v. DC Bd. of Elections Montgomery Sibley

D.C. Court of Appeals No. 12 AA 516 Citation

DISMISSED

n/a – case brought in Court of Appeals

No
Obama not a Defendant

Sibley v. D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics, No. 12 AA 516 (D.C. Ct. App. May 29, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from appearing on 2012 primary ballot).

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 43 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name
143.

Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D.C. Superior Court No. 2012 CA 004892 Citation D.C. Court of Appeals No. 12 AA 1498 Citation
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Sibley v. DC Bd. of Elections Montgomery Sibley Sibley v. DC Bd. of Elections Montgomery Sibley

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Sibley v. D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, No. 2012 CA 004892 B (D.C. Super. Ct., Sept. 7, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from appearing on 2012 general election ballot); DISMISSED
1. n/a – case brought in Court of Appeals 2. Petition for Writ of Certiorari No. 12-467

No
Obama not a Defendant

144.

Pending

Sibley v. D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics, No. 12 AA 1498 (D.C. Ct. App., Sept. 18, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 general election ballot); reh’g denied (Oct. 2, 2012)..

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 44 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D.C. Cir. (Federal) 1:12-cv-01832 Justia | RECAP Citation D.C. Cir. (Federal) 1:12-cv-01984-JDB29 Justia | RECAP Citation D.C. Court of Appeals No. 12-AA-1906B Citation Alabama State Court Montgomery County CV-2008-001906.00 30
H H HF

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

145.

Sibley v. Obama Montgomery Sibley

DISMISSED

Yes

Sibley v. Obama, No. 1:12-cv-01832 (D.D.C. Dec. 19, 2012) (dismissing purported quo warranto suit asking court to compel Obama to demonstrate that he is a “natural born citizen”). Pending No
Obama not a Defendant

146.

Sibley v. Alexander et al Montgomery Sibley Sibley v. DC Bd. of Elections Montgomery Sibley Sorensen v. Riley (Obama & McCain) Harold Sorenson

Sibley v. Obama, No. 2012-CA-008644 B (D.D.C. removed from DC Super. Ct. Dec. 12, 2012) (purported quo warranto suit asking court to compel Obama to demonstrate that he is a “natural born citizen”). Pending No
Obama not a Defendant

147.

Sibley v. D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics, 12-AA-1906B (D.C. Ct. App., Sept. 18, 2012) (complaint challenging Obama’s 2012 election); No DISMISSED ----State defended; No Obama atty appeared

148.

Citation Alabama State Court Jefferson-Birmingham County 01-CV-2011-0023.00 Citation

Sorenson v. Riley, No. CV-2008-001906.00 (Ala. Montgomery Cty. Cir. Ct. Jan. 1, 2009) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s and McCain’s eligibility); No
Obama not a Defendant

149.

Sorenson v. Kennedy Harold Sorenson

DISMISSED

---

---

Sorenson v. Kennedy, No. 01-CV-2011-0023.00 (Ala. Montgomery Cty. Cir. Ct. Jan. 19, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot);

29 30

Removed to federal court; case originally filed in D.C. Superior Court (No. 2012-CA-008644 B). Note: Requires paid subscription to access court documents: Complaint; Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Dismiss Granted.
H H H H H H

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 45 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Ohio State Court Erie County C.P. 2008CV1116 Citation N.D. Ohio (Federal) 1:08-cv-02593-JG Justia - RECAP
H H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

150.

Spuck v. Secretary of State

DISMISSED (SOS Report, p. 15)
H H

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Spuck v. Secretary of State, No. 2008CV1116 (Ohio Erie County Ct. Com. Pl. ____, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility); DISMISSED
H

No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

151.

Stamper v. US Gordon Allen Stamper

“Appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith”

Citation New York King County Supreme (Trial) Court 029641/2008
H

Stamper v. United States, No. 1:08 CV 2593, 2008 WL 4838073 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 4, 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s and Obama’s eligibility, finding that appeal could not be taken in good faith); ----No
Obama not a Defendant

152.

Strunk v. Patterson Christopher Earl Strunk

DISMISSED
H

H

Citation New York King County Supreme (Trial) Court 029642/2008
H H

Strunk v. Patterson, No. 029641/2008 (N.Y. King County Supr. Ct. Nov. 3, 2008) (dismissing case seeking to stay 2008 election on various grounds); MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER DENIED 31
F

153.

Strunk v. Patterson Christopher Earl Strunk

Consolidated app. for appeal (w/ 2011 case below) N.Y. App. Ct. (2nd Dept) Case No. 2011-11561

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

DISMISSED Strunk v. Patterson, No. 029642/2008 (N.Y. King County Supr. Ct. Nov. 24, 2009) (denying motion for subpoenas to multiple government agencies for documents allegedly relating to Obama’s eligibility and denying motion for protective order);

Citation

31

Note: On November 24, 2009, the Trial Court declined to enter a protective order requested by Strunk in this case. In 2010 and 2011, the docket reflects multiple orders denying Strunk motions. Defendants have never appeared in the case. Thus, while the docket does not indicate that the “case” is closed, all motions have been ruled upon and Strunk’s request for relief has been denied.
H H

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 46 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket E.D.N.Y. (Federal Court) 1:08cv04289 Justia - RECAP Citation
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

154.

Strunk v. NY State Board of Elections Christopher Earl Strunk

DISMISSED

2d Circuit: 08-5422 APPEAL DISMISSED

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Strunk v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections, No. 1:08-cv-04289-ARR-LB (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2008) (dismissing case challenging, among other things, Obama’s eligibility, as irrational and frivolous and finding that appeal could not be taken in good faith), appeal dismissed, No. 08-5422 (2d Cir. Nov. 14, 2008);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 47 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

PARTIALLY DISMISSED as to all Obama records
PARTIALLY DISMISSED

D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:08cv02234 Justia - RECAP
H H H

as to all requests to State Dept. (related to Dunham records only)

PARTIALLY DISMISSED
as to requests to Customs & Border Patrol (related to Dunham records only)

Pre-Trial Disposition DC Circuit: 08-5503 HWrit DISMISSED HReconsideration DENIED DC Circuit: 09-5322 Writ of Mandamus DENIED

No
Obama not a Defendant

DISMISSED as to all remaining claims
155.

D.C. Circuit: 10-5092 APPEAL DISMISSED Motion to Reconsider DENIED

Strunk v U.S. Dept. of State (FOIA) Christopher Earl Strunk 32
F

Citation

Strunk v. U.S. Dept. of State, 693 F. Supp. 2d 112 (D.D.C. Cir. 2010) (FOIA case seeking records from various agencies relating to Obama and his mother) (granting motion to dismiss to extent Strunk sought information relating to Obama; denying Strunk’s request for mandamus relief and for quo warranto action; granting stay of discovery) mandamus denied, No. 08-5503 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 8, 2009), mandamus denied, No. 09-5322 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 25, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. 10-5092, (D.C. Cir. Aug. 26, 2010); see also Strunk v. U.S. Dept. of State, 770 F.Supp.2d 10 (D.D.C. 2011) (granting summary judgment as to Department of State; finding that agency had “demonstrated full compliance with the FOIA”; determining that CBP had not yet demonstrated that its search for responsive records was adequate); 845 F. Supp. 2d 38, 47 (D.D.C. 2012) (finding that CBP demonstrated its search for responsive records was adequate and reasonable and that it properly withheld information under FOIA Exemption 6; however, CBP had not demonstrated that it properly withheld information under Exemption 7(E)); 2012 WL 577763 (D.D.C. Feb. 15, 2012) (ordering CPB to file renewed motion for summary judgment with respect to the information withheld under Exemption 7(E)); --- F. Supp. ----, 2012 WL 5875653 (D.D.C. Nov. 21, 2012) (finding that CBP properly has withheld information from the one-page document containing travel information about Stanley Ann Dunham and granting summary judgment on that issue; further finding that since all agencies had demonstrated compliance with the FOIA and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, final judgment in favor of defendants was proper);

32

Note: Strunk has filed multiple additional “nonbirther” cases against Obama and/or the Federal Government, including, but not limited to the following: 1:2008cv01196; 1:2009cv01249; and 1:2009cv01295.
H H H H H H

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 48 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D.D.C. Federal Court No. 1:10-cv-00486-RCL
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

156.

Strunk v. Obama Christopher Earl Strunk

DISMISSED

Held in Abeyance33 D.C. Cir. No. 12-5289

Strunk v. Obama, No. 1:10-cv-00486-RCL (Jan. 1, 2011) (dismissing purported quo warrranto and qui tam Citation action which alleged that Obama was not eligible to be President), 2012 WL 3113947 (D.D.C. Aug. 1, 2012) (denying as frivolous motion for leave to amend to reassert claims and supplement claims). N.Y. App. Ct. (2nd Dept) No. 2011-11561 Appeal as of Right DISMISSED New York Kings County Supreme (Trial) Court 006500/2011 DISMISSED Consolidated app. for appeal Rejecting Birther “2-Parent” (w/ 2008 case above) NBC Argument N.Y. App. Ct. (2nd Dept) Case No. 2011-11561 OSC re Sanctions Issued DISMISSED
Appeal Pending 2nd Division

Yes

157.

Strunk v. NY State Board of Elections Christopher Earl Strunk

No. M14547334 Strunk v. NY Bd. of Elections et al, 35 Misc. 3d 1208(A), 2012 WL 1205117, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 50614 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Apr. 11, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging, among other things, President Obama’s eligibility to his office; expressly rejecting the birther claim that Obama is ineligible on the basis of his father’s citizenship as frivolous, and issuing a show cause order as to why sanctions should not be imposed upon plaintiff); Objection OVERRULED ----No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation

158.

Strunk v. Obama Christopher-Earl: Strunk

New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation

In re Objection of Christopher-Earl: Strunk, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2012) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid);

33

D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued order on Sept. 13, 2012, holding appeal in “abeyance pending the district court's resolution of Appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.”
34

Per Oct. 26, 2012 order, Strunk has until February 13, 2012 to perfect his appeal/file briefs.
Page 49 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Michigan State Court
159.

Stumpo v. Gov. of Michigan Paul Joseph Stumpo, John Carlos Cruz

30th Dist. Court (Ingham County)

DISMISSED
H

No. 08-140-MM

Michigan App. Ct. No. 291681 Appeal DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED
H

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation North Carolina Superior Court 08-cv-1076 Citizen Wells
H

Stumpo v. Gov. of Michigan, No. 08-140-MM (Mich. Dist. Ct. (30th) Mar. 31, 2009) (granting summary disposition in case filed challenging Obama’s eligibility), appeal dismissed, No. 291681 (Mich. Ct. App. June 3, 2009), recons. denied (Oct. 1, 2009); DISMISSED (per Citizen Wells)
H H

160.

Sullivan v. Secretary of State Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation North Carolina Superior Court 08-cvs-021393 RSOL
H

Sullivan v. N.C. Sec’y of State, No. 08CV-1076 (N.C. Super. Ct. Oct. 29, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility); DISMISSED (per RSOL & NBC)
H H H H

161.

Sullivan v. Marshall 35 Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan
F

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation Hawaii State District Court 1st Circuit No. 1cc12-1-000006 Citation

Sullivan v. Marshall, No. 08CVS-021393 (N.C. Super. Ct. Mar. 16, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility); DISMISSED Pending Haw. Ct. App. No. CAAP-12-0000501 No
Not a defendant

162.

Sunahara v. Haw. Dept. of Health Duncan Sunahara36

---

Sunahara v. Haw. Dept. of Health, No. 1cc12-1-000006 (Haw. 1st Dist. Ct., Mar. 8, 2012) (complaint seeking access to birth/death records of Sunahara based on alleged connection to Obama’s eligibility);

35 36

Note: There appears to have been one other case filed by Sullivan, Sullivan v. Secretary of State for North Carolina (class action), No. #08CV1153.

This is classified as a “birther” case because plaintiffs believe that the birth certificate of Virginia Sunahara – who died shortly after birth – was used for Obama’s birth certificate.
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 50 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:09-mc-00346-RCL Justia - RECAP
H H H H

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

163.

Super American Grand Jury Carl Swensson

DISMISSED Motion for Reconsideration Order
H

No ----Court dismissed sua sponte

Citation Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1216218-60-MALIHI Citation

In re Super Am. Grand Jury, No. 1:09-mc-00346-RCL (D.D.C. July 2, 2009) (denying leave to file grand jury presentment challenging Obama’s eligibility); Objection DENIED - Obama Eligible (ALJ) Finding Obama is NBC Secretary of State Final Decision Finding Obama is NBC (Adopting ALJ Decision) Yes (in papers; not at hearing)

164.

Swensson v. Obama Carl Swensson

See below

Swensson v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1216218-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012); Ga. Supreme Court. No. S12D1076 DENIED Emergency Motion for Injunction DENIED No --Dismissed before Attorney entered appearance

Swensson v. Obama Carl Swensson

Georgia Fulton County Superior Ct 2012CV211527

Appeal of SOS Decision DISMISSED

Citation

Swensson v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1216218-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012)., appeal dismissed, Swensson v. Obama, No. 2012CV211527 (Ga. Fulton Cty. Super. Ct., Mar. 2, 2012), motion for injunction denied, No. S12D1076 (Ga. Mar. 13, 2012), appeal denied (Ga. Apr. 4, 2012); Challenge DENIED --But see Taitz v. Obama, below --No

165.

Swihart v. Obama Karl Swihart

Indiana Election Commission No. 2012-176 Citation

Swihart v. Obama, No. 2012-176 (Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 51 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

166.

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:10-cv-00151 Justia - RECAP

DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED Reconsideration (2nd) DENIED

---

---

No
Gov. defended

Citation D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:11-cv-00402 Justia - RECAP Citation

Taitz v. Obama, 707 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility), recons. denied, No. 1:10-cv-00151 (D.D.C. June 18, 2010), 2d mot. for recons. denied, 754 F.Supp.2d 57 (D.D.C. 2010); DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED
H

167.

Taitz v. Astrue
(FOIA)

D.C. Cir. No. 11-5304 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

Application for Stay Reportedly filed Sept 2012 but not on SCOTUS docket

No
Obama not a Defendant

Orly Taitz

Taitz v. Astrue, 806 F. Supp. 2d 214 (D.D.C. 2011) (dismissing FOIA complaint seeking documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility), recons. denied (Oct. 17, 2011), aff’d No. 11- 5304, 2012 WL 1930959 (D.C. Cir. May 25, 2012); D.C. Cir. No. 11-5306 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED DISMISSED D.C. Cir. No. 11-5329 Petition for Writ of Mandamus DISMISSED -----

168.

Taitz v. Ruemmler
(FOIA)

D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:11-cv-01421 Justia - RECAP

Orly Taitz Citation D. Haw. (Federal Court) 1:11-cv-00519-SOM -RLP37 Justia - RECAP Citation

Taitz v. Ruemmler, No. 1:11- CV-01421, 2011 WL 4916936 (D.D.C. Oct. 17, 2011) (dismissing FOIA complaint seeking documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility), mandamus dismissed, No. 11-5329 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 23, 2012), aff’d, No. 11-5306, 2012 WL 1922284 (D.C. Cir. May 25, 2012); DISMISSED
(Motion Denied)

169.

Taitz v. Astrue
(Companion to DC FOIA)

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Orly Taitz

Taitz v. Astrue, No. 1:11-cv-00519-SOM -RLP (D. Haw. Oct. 26, 2011) (rejecting ex parte application to compel discovery regarding Obama’s eligibility in related case pending in the District of Columbia);

37

Case originally filed as 1:11-mc-00158.
Page 52 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

170.

Taitz v. Fuddy (FOIA) Orly Taitz

Hawaii State District Court 1st Circuit 1CC11-1-001731

DISMISSED Rehearing DENIED Motion [for] Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement DENIED Ex Parte Amended Motion for Reconsideration DENIED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission Case No. BLC 2011-4 Citation Hawaii Office of Elections Citation New Hampshire Supreme Court Case No. 2011-0880 Citation

Taitz v. Fuddy, No. 1CC11-1-001731 (Haw. 1st Cir. Ct. Nov. 10, 2011) (dismissing appeal of agency refusal to grant access to documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility), recons. denied (Jan. 6, 2012), recons. denied (Feb. 7, 2012);
PETITION DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED

171.

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

--But see Taitz v. Gardner, below

Taitz v. Obama, No. BLC 2011-4 (N.H. Ballot Law Comm’n Nov. 18, 2011) (dismissing petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot), recons. denied (Nov. 28, 2011); appeal denied, Taitz v. Gardner, No. 2011-0880 (N.H. Dec. 27, 2011);
PETITION REJECTED

---

No
Petition Rejected

172.

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

Taitz v. Obama, No. Number Assigned (Haw. Office of Elections Dec. 2, 2011) (rejecting petition seeking to challenge Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and demand for emergency hearing re: same); Application DENIED
N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

173.

Taitz v. Gardner (NH Ballot Commission)38 Orly Taitz

No
Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Gardner, No. 2011-0880 (N.H. Dec. 27, 2011) (denying petition for original jurisdiction and/or appeal challenging order entered by N.H. Ballot Law Comm’n in Taitz v. Obama, No. BLC 2011-4 (N.H. Ballot Law Comm’n Nov. 18, 2011)).

38

This is a court challenge of the N.H. Ballot Decision referenced below.
Page 53 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Hawaii Supreme Court SPCW-12-000014 Citation Indiana Election Commission No Number Assigned Citation
176.

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+ N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

“Obama Defense” 1
F

DENIED

No
Obama not a Defendant

174.

Taitz v. Nishimura Orly Taitz

Taitz v. Nishimura, No. SPCW-12-000014, 2012 WL 120367 (Haw. Jan. 12, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to force circuit court judge to issue order forcing Dept. of Health to grant access to documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility); --Challenge DENIED
But see Taitz v. Indiana Election Commission, below

175.

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Obama, No Number Assigned (Ind. Election Div. Feb. 16, 2012) (notice to Taitz that her election challenge could not be accepted due to failure to follow appropriate procedures); No Pending
Removed to Fed Court 4/25/12

Taitz v. Democrat (sic) Party of Mississippi, Secretary of State, et al Orly Taitz

S.D. Miss (Federal Court)39 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA Justia | RECAP Citation Indiana Marion County Superior Court #49D141203MI012046

Obama named as Defendant but not (yet) served

Taitz v. Democrat Party of Miss. et al, No. 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss., pending case bringing RICO charges and challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot, removed to federal court Apr. 24, 2012); Motion for Injunction DENIED Case DISMISSED No
Obama not a Defendant

177.

Taitz et al v. Indiana Elections Comm’n et al
Orly Taitz Karl Swihart, Edward Kesler, Frank Weyl, Bob Kern

Citation

Taitz et al v. Ind. Elec. Commn. et al, No. 49D0103MI012046 (Ind. Marion County Super. Ct. June 12, 2012) (dismissing election contest bought by multiple plaintiffs challenging election board’s rejection of challenges seeking to exclude Obama from 2012 ballot and seeking to prohibit Indiana Secretary of State from including Obama on ballot; permitting Taitz to amend complaint to allege other causes of action); Order dismissing amended complaint in its entirety (Nov. 5, 2012) (dismissing amended complaint stating claims for declaratory and injunctive relief regarding Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot);

39

Originally filed Mississippi Circuit Court (1st Judicial District), No. 251-12-107CIV.
Page 54 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

178.

C.D. Cal. No. 8:12-cv-01092-DMG-JC DISMISSED Taitz v. Sebelius et RECAP al Taitz v. Sebelius, No. 12-cv-01092-DMG-JC (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2012) (dismissing, on lack of venue Orly Taitz Citation grounds, complaint seeking, among other things, to invalidate the Affordable Health Care Act’s validity, on grounds that Obama was not eligible to serve as President when he signed it); N.D. Tex. No. 3:12-cv-03251-P RECAP DISMISSED

179.

Taitz v. Sebelius et al Orly Taitz

Taitz v. Sebelius, No. 3:12-cv-03251-P (N.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2012) (complaint seeking, among other things, to invalidate the Affordable Health Care Act’s validity, on grounds that Obama was not eligible to serve as Citation President when he signed it), Judgment (Nov. 26, 2012) (dismissing case with prejudice and assessing costs against Plaintiff); Cal. Superior Court Orange County No. 30-2012 00582135

App for Emergency Stay DENIED40
Case DISMISSED

180.

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

Taitz v. Obama, No. 30-2012 00582135 (Cal. Super. Ct. July 13, 2012) (denying “emergency” motion to Citation stay certification of primary election results on grounds that Obama not eligible to serve as President (among others)); Order (Nov. 7, 2012) (dismissing case with prejudice); Kansas District Court Shawnee County No. 12C 001027 Citation DISMISSED Taitz et al v. Kobach, No. 12CI027 (Kan. Dist. Ct., Nov. 5, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking, among other things, to prevent placement of Obama on the 2012 general election ballot);

181.

Taitz et al v. Kobach et al

40

Taitz attempted to remove this case to federal court, apparently abandoning the state claims. See Judd v. Obama et al, supra. However, the federal court dismissed that lawsuit.
Page 55 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket J.P.M.L. No. 2417 Citation
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

In re Orley Taitz Litigation

DISMISSED In re Orley [sic] Taitz Litigation, No. 2417 (JPML Oct. 31, 2012) (order striking motion to transfer and closing case). GA Supreme Court No. S09D0284 DISMISSED; Reconsideration DENIED No. S09A1373 DISMISSED
H H H

182.

Terry v. Handel Bryan Thomas Terry, Sr

Georgia Fulton County Superior Ct # 2008CV158774

DISMISSED (Docket)
H H

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

Citation D. Haw. (Federal Court) 1:08mc00280 Justia - RECAP

Terry v. Handel, No. 2008cv158774 (Ga,. Super. Ct. (Fulton County), Oct. 24, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Dec. 3, 2008), recons. denied, (Ga. Jan. 12, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. S09A1373 (Ga. May 18, 2009); No DISMISSED
H

183.

Thomas v. Hosemann41 Daniel Scott Thomas Thomas v. Hosemann Daniel Scott Thomas

---

---

H

H

H

Voluntarily dismissed

Citation D. Miss. (Federal Court) 2:08-cv-00241-KS-MTP Justia - RECAP

Thomas v. Hosemann, No. 1:08-mc-00280 (D. Haw. Dec. 18, 2008) (dismissing action seeking to compel Hawaii Dept. of Health to provide access to documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility); Voluntarily DISMISSED
H

184.

---

---

No
Obama not a Defendant

H

H

H

Citation

Thomas v. Hosemann, No. 2:08-cv-00241-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Dec. 18, 2008) (voluntarily dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility; case dismissed with prejudice);

41

Note: This case was actually an ancillary case to the Mississippi case noted below. After filing the Mississippi case, Thomas filed a subpoena duces tecum seeking to compel discovery in Hawaii. When the Mississippi case was dismissed, the ancillary Hawaii case was likewise dismissed.
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 56 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Alabama St. Clair-Pell County Cir. Ct. 75-CV-2012-000003.00 Citation New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation E.D. Va. (Federal Court) 3:12-cv-00036-JAG
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

185.

Thompson v. Kennedy Tommy Thompson

DISMISSED

No
Obama not a Defendant

Thompson v. Kennedy, No. 75-CV-2012-000003.00 (Ala. St. Clair-Pell Cty. Cir. Ct. Jan. 13, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot); Objection OVERRULED In re Objection of Julianne Thompson, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid); DISMISSED Finding Obama is NBC AFFIRMED Finding Obama is NBC42 No. 12-1124 No
Court dismissed sua sponte

186.

Thompson v. Obama Julianne Thompson

187.

Tisdale v. Obama Charles Tisdale

Citation New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation

Tisdale v. Obama, No. 3:12-cv-00036-JAG (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility; finding that Obama is “natural born citizen” because he was born in Hawaii), aff’d, No. 12-1124 (4th Cir. Jun 5, 2012) (per curiam). Objection OVERRULED In re Objection of H. William Van Allen, No Number Assigned, (N.Y. Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid);

188.

Van Allen v. Obama H. William Van Allen

42

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision “for the reasons stated by the district court”).
Page 57 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket New York State Supreme Court, Albany County No. 1787–12
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

189.

Van Allen v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections H. William Van Allen

DISMISSED 36 Misc. 3d 1212(A)

Van Allen v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections, 36 Misc. 3d 1212(A) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jul. 9, 2012) (dismissing Citation petition for writ of mandamus, emergency injunctive relief and declaratory relief regarding definition of “natural born citizen); North Carolina Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation No Petition Rejected
Petition rejected sua sponte

190.

Vestal v. Obama

Vestal v. Obama, No Number Assigned (N.C. Bd. of Elections Dec. 13, 2011) (rejecting attempt to file election challenge petition and obtain emergency hearing to challenge Obama’s eligibity to be on the 2012 ballot).

191.

Florida Pending DISMISSED Yes Leon County Circuit Court Fla. 1st DCA Finding Obama is NBC 37 2012 CA 000467 No. 1D12-3489 Voeltz v. Obama et al Voeltz v. Obama, No. 37 2012 CA 000467, 2012 WL 2524874 (Fla. Cir. Ct. June 29, 2012) (dismissing Michael C. Voeltz complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot; finding that persons born in US are “natural Citation born citizens” per Wong Kim Ark and Ankeny, regardless of parentage and rejecting birther argument to the contrary);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 58 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Florida Leon County Circuit Court 37 2012 CA 002063
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22

“Obama Defense” 1
F

DISMISSED Finding Obama is NBC

Yes

192.

Voeltz v. Obama et al Michael C. Voeltz

Voeltz v. Obama, No. 37 2012 CA 002063, 2012 WL 4117478 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Sept. 6, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking declaration that Obama is not eligible for presidency because he was not born in US and Citation was not born to two US citizen parents; finding that persons born in US are “natural born citizens” per Wong Kim Ark and Ankeny, regardless of parentage and rejecting birther argument to the contrary; reserving for later ruling motion for sanctions);

193.

Florida Voeltz v. Obama et Leon County Circuit Court Pending 37 2012 CA 003857 al Michael C. Voeltz Voeltz v. Obama, 37 2012 CA 003857 (Fla. Cir. Ct. , filed Nov. 29, 2012) (third birther compliant filed b Citation Voeltz regarding Obama’s eligibility to the presidency); Volodarsky v. Obama Leonard Volodarsky New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1215137-60-MALIHI Citation Objection OVERRULED In re Objection of Leonard Volodarsky, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid); Objection DENIED - Obama Eligible (ALJ) Finding Obama is NBC Secretary of State Final Decision Finding Obama is NBC (Adopting ALJ Decision)

194.

-----

Yes

195.

Welden v. Obama David P. Welden

Welden v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215137-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012).

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 59 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

BIRTHER SCORECARD
CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE. Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name Original Decision Original Tribunal Case No. Docket
Total Actions: 198 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 190 Pending: 8

Appeal(s)
Total Appellate Court Rulings1: >70+ Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: >70+

US Supreme Court
Total Supreme Court Rulings1: 22 Birthers win: 0 Birthers lose: 22 Petition for Cert

“Obama Defense” 1
F

Georgia State Court Fulton County Superior Ct 2012CV211527 Welden v. Obama David P. Welden Citation

Appeal of SOS Decision DISMISSED

Ga. Supreme Court No. S12D1059 DENIED Emergency Motion for Injunction DENIED

DENIED No. 12-5

Yes in Trial Court No in GA Supreme Court

Welden v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215137-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012), appeal dismissed, No. 2012CV211527 (Ga. Fulton Cty. Super. Ct., Mar. 2, 2012), motion for injunction denied, No. S12D1059 (Ga. Mar. 13, 2012), appeal denied (Ga. Apr. 4, 2012) , cert denied, No. 12-5 (U.S. Sept. 24, 2012); --Challenge DENIED
But see Taitz v. Indiana Election Commission, above

196.

Weyl v. Obama Franklin D. Weyl

Indiana Election Commission No. 2012-161 Citation Hawaii State Court 1st Circuit 1CC11-1-002276 Citation Connecticut Supreme Court SC 18264 Citation

---

Weyl v. Obama, No. 2012-161(Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”) (written decision unavailable but video of hearing is available at http://www.in.gov/sos/022412_Video_3.html (last visited April 11, 2012)); DISMISSED Pending Haw. Ct. App. CAAP-12-0000499 No
Obama not a Defendant

197.

Wolf v. Fuddy William Wolf

Wolf v. Fuddy, No. 1CC11-1-002276 (Haw. 1st Cir. Ct. Sept. 30, 2011) (dismissing case seeking to compel disclosure of documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility);
Action filed in Supreme Court

198.

Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz Cort Wrotnowski

DISMISSED
H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

Application DENIE No D Obama not a Defendant (08A469)
H

Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz, 958 A.2d 709 (Conn. 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility), application for stay denied, 129 S.Ct. 775 (2008);

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 60 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Judd Cases
Case Citation / Status
1.

Jurisdiction Alabama RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion “It is ORDERED that the motion for relief from judgment, etc. (doc. no. 19) is denied.”

Judd v. Secy of State of Alabama, No 2:11-cv00437 (M.D. Ala. Aug 10, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds ); Judd v. Sec’y of State of Alabama, No. 2:11-cv00333 (M.D. Ala.)

RECAP | PACER RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. [Noting that Judd had previously been declared vexatious litigant] …”In this circumstance, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice on procedural grounds. His complaint would not have been dismissed if he had shown that he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury. He did not do so at that time and does not do so now. Instead, plaintiff raises arguments which may have been appropriate had his complaint been dismissed on the merits. Thus, he has failed to “demonstrate a justification for relief so compelling that the district court was required to grant [the] motion.” Id. at 806. Accordingly, his motion is DENIED.” The court dismissed this pro se § 1983 action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) on June 6, 2011. (Doc. The Eleventh Circuit dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal on October 18, 2011. (Doc. 10). The Court DENIES the motion. (Doc. 13). “Plaintiff Judd did not pay the filing fee required to proceed with a civil action in federal court. His application for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees was denied. Judd appealed that decision, but his appeal was dismissed as frivolous. This case is closed. The motions filed by Judd at dockets 14, 15, and 16 are therefore DENIED. The court will not entertain any further motions, letters or other documents from Judd. If Judd sends further papers relating to this case, the Clerk of Court shall not file them, but instead shall mail them back to Judd.”

2.

Judd v. State of Alabama, No. 1:11-cv-00282KD-M (S.D. Ala. Sept. 13, 2012 order)

3.

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Alabama, No. 2:11-cv01753-KOB-TMP (N.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2012) (denying motion); Judd v. Office of the Lieutenant Governor of Alaska, Elections Division et al, No. 3:11-cv00123-JWS (D. Alaska Aug. 24, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

RECAP | PACER

4.

Alaska RECAP | PACER

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 61 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
5.

Jurisdiction Arizona RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd, who is confined in the Federal Correctional InstitutionTexarkana in Texarkana, Texas, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On July 13, 2011, the Court dismissed this action under the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal. On October 24, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mandate dismissing the appeal and stating “because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed.” On August 2, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. 15). The Court has reviewed the pleadings, its orders, and the order of the Ninth Circuit and finds no reason to reconsider dismissal of this action. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s August 2, 2012 Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. 15) is denied. This case must remain closed. “Pending is Plaintiff’s pro se Motion for Relief from Judgment and Motion to Amend for Court Order to Register all Convicted and Incarcerated Felons to Vote in all Federal Elections and for Order to Remove Barack Obama from State’s 2012 Presidential Primary (Doc. No. 19). The Motion is DENIED.”

Judd v. Arizona Secy of State, No. 2:2011-cv01058 (D. Ariz. , motion filed Aug. 2, 2012 order)

6.

Judd v. Arkansas Sec’y of State, No. 4:11-cv00447-BRW (E.D. Ark. Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. Secretary of State of Arkansas et al, No. 4:2011-cv-04049 (W.D. Ark.)

Arkansas RECAP | PACER

Arkansas RECAP | PACER

TEXT ONLY ORDER denying 23 Motion for Leave to File, as the proposed motion does not allege that movant is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, is procedurally improper, and substantively without merit. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 31, 2012. (jlg) (Entered: 08/31/2012) Unclear – docket does not reflect an order addressing motion, but appeal – apparently re: pending motion – has been filed. “…Petitioner now moves for relief from judgment under the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, to amend the court order to register all convicted and incarcerated felons, and for an order to remove Barack Obama from the State’s 2012 presidential primary election ballot/caucus and award all delegated to himself, a Democratic presidential candidate. *** The Court finds nothing in Plaintiff’s allegations in his motion to reconsider that merits reconsideration. Plaintiff’s arguments regarding a convicted felon’s right to vote were previously addressed in the order of dismissal. Plaintiff’s request that the Court order that he be awarded presidential delegates is not the subject of this action and do not justify reconsideration of the Court’s Order of Dismissal. Similarly, President Obama’s citizenship status is not at issue in this case.”
Page 62 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

7.

Judd v. Cal. Secy of State et al, No. 2:2011-cv01557 (E.D. Cal., docketed Aug. 2, 2012) (pending) Judd v. Cal. Secy of State et al, No. 3:2011-cv02805 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27,. 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

California RECAP | PACER California RECAP | PACER

8.

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
9.

Jurisdiction California RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion "...The Court has reviewed its previous order, the Ninth Circuit’s order, Plaintiff’s present motion, and the other filings in this case. (Doc. Nos. 3, 6 & 9.) The Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that relief from judgment is warranted. For example, Plaintiff fails to articulate any mistake made by this Court, Plaintiff fails to provide any newly discovered evidence, Plaintiff fails to identify any fraud by an opposing party, and Plaintiff fails to provide any other reason that justifies relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Plaintiff’s motion does not address[] the Court’s previous basis for dismissing this action. Furthermore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in this matter without payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ..." “Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 17) is DENIED because Plaintiff fails to present any argument that addresses the basis for the order dismissing this action.”

Judd v. Cal. Secy of State et al, No. 3:2011-cv01287 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

10.

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Colorado, Civil Case No.1:11-cv-01399-LTB (D. Colo. Aug 7, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. Conn. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 3:11-cv00879-MRK (D. Conn. Aug. 6, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. Secretary of State of Delaware et al, No. 1:11-cv-00512-GMS (D. Del. Aug 6, 2012 order) (remark rejecting attempt to file motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds, because case closed and appeal terminated)
No case found

Colorado RECAP | PACER

11.

Connecticut RECAP | PACER

Docket Entry Only: “The Court dismissed Mr. Judd's suit because he did not pay the required filing fee, but Mr. Judd's motion does not address this issue, much less provide a valid reason for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b).”

12.

Delaware RECAP | [PACER

Docket Entry Only: “Not Accepted: ECF #13: “Document titled "Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment" - (docketed, but not set up as a pending Motion since case is closed and appeal has been terminated)”

D.C.

No case found

13.

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Florida, Civil Case No. 4:11-cv-00234-SPM-WCS (N.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);;

Florida RECAP | PACER

“Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (doc. 22) is denied. Plaintiff is not under imminent danger of serious physical injury and he is not entitled to proceed without payment of the filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Any appeal of this matter is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).”

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 63 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
14.

Jurisdiction Florida RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion Docket Entry only: “ORDER denying 17 Motion as frivolous. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 8/7/2012. (Conway, Anne) (Entered: 08/07/2012 order).”

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Florida, Civil Case No. 6:11-cv-00867-ACC-KRS (N.D. Fla. Aug. 7, 2012 order) (denying, as frivolous, motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds) Judd v. Ga. Sec’y of State. et al, No. 2:11-cv00089-LGW-JEG (S.D. Ga. Aug. 10, 2012 order) (dismissing motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds) Judd v. Ga. Sec’y of State. et al, No. 1:11-cv01797-WSD (N.D. Ga. Sept. 26, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

15.

Georgia RECAP | PACER

“By Order dated June 1, 2011, this case was transferred to [N.D. Ga.]. As this case is closed in this court, Plaintiff's motion(s) are dismissed.”

16.

Georgia RECAP | PACER

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is untimely and inappropriate. The Court entered its order on the Magistrate Judge’s Final R&R more than a year before Plaintiff filed his Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff does not present any coherent explanation or legal basis for reconsideration based on the existence of newly discovered evidence, an intervening development or change in controlling law, or a need to correct a clear error of law or fact. Justice does not here require granting Plaintiff relief from the Court’s Order, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is denied.” Docket Entry: “This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER denying as patently frivolous 18 Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment, etc. On June 16, 2011, this Court denied Plaintiff motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his case without prejudice. Should Plaintiff wish to proceed on his claims, he must submit a new complaint, together with the required filing fee. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 9/25/2012. (ssh) (Entered: 09/25/2012 order)” No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. “Plaintiff, a Texas inmate, has accumulated three strikes, and was ordered to pay the filing fee if he wished to proceed with his suit. (Dkt. 12.) Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee, and his case was dismissed. (Dkt. 15, 16.) Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Relief from Judgment. (Dkt. 19.) While Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 outlines several bases for relief from judgment, Plaintiff’s Motion fails to set forth any factual basis that would support relief from judgment in this instance. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment (Dkt. 19) is DENIED.”
No case found

17.

Judd v. Ga. Sec’y of State. et al, No. 5:11-cv00233-CAR-CHW (M.D. Ga. Sept. 25, 2012 order) (denying, as “patently frivolous,” motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. Office of Elections of Hawaii, No. 11-cv00365 (D. Hi.)

Georgia RECAP | PACER

Hawaii RECAP | PACER Idaho RECAP | PACER

18.

Judd v. Idaho, 1:11-cv-00277-EJL (D. Idaho Oct 1, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

No case found

Illinois

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 64 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
No case found
19.

Jurisdiction
Indiana

Court Decision on Motion
No case found

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Iowa, No. 5:11-cv04050-MWB (N.D. Iowa Aug. 27, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. State of Iowa, Civil Case No. 4:11-cv00253-JAJ (S.D. Iowa Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Iowa RECAP | PACER

“This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (docket no. 19). The plaintiff filed such motion on August 1, 2012. The court dismissed this case over a year ago. Moreover, given the fact that the plaintiff never properly commenced a civil action, there is no reason to address the plaintiff’s reasserted claims; the fact that the plaintiff is not entitled to the advantages of proceeding in forma pauperis has not changed. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (docket no. 19) is denied. “Plaintiff is an inmate of the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas. He brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, requesting injunctive relief to have his name added to the 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot as a Democratic Candidate for President of the United States of America. The Court determined Plaintiff had three or more civil actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, and as such, was barred from bringing a civil action without prepayment of fees “unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff did not show he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury, and the case was dismissed. His appeal was dismissed for failure to prosecute. . . . Plaintiff now moves for relief from judgment, requesting the restoration of the right to vote for felons (released or incarcerated) and to remove President Barack Obama from the 2012 Presidential ballot. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the court may relieve a party from a final judgment for mistake, inadvertence, newly discovered evidence, fraud, void judgment, satisfaction of judgment, or any other reason that justifies relief. Plaintiff does not specify the reason for seeking relief from judgment, and neither is the court able to identify any meritorious basis for granting relief from judgment. The motion [ECF No. 16] is denied.“

20.

Iowa RECAP | PACER

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 65 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
21.

Jurisdiction Kansas RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion “This action was dismissed and all relief was denied by order entered July 15, 2011, on account of plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. Mr. Judd is a three-strikes litigant and made no showing of imminent danger. Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal, and on October 4, 2011, his appeal was dismissed. This matter is currently before the court upon another post-judgment motion filed by plaintiff, which generally re-argues his claims and argues new claims. He has also filed a second notice of appeal purportedly to the Supreme Court with respect to the pending post-judgment motion. The court finds that the post-judgment motion contains no valid ground for relief from judgment or for any of the other orders sought therein. * * *”

Judd v. Kansas, State of et al, No. 5:2011-cv03104 (S.D. Kan. Sept. 18, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

22.

Judd v. Ky. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 3:11-cv-00346JGH (W.D. Ky. Aug. 20, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Kentucky RECAP | PACER

“…Plaintiff has now filed a motion for relief from judgment under the 24th Amendment (DN 22). He does not address his failure to pay the filing fee or comply with the Orders of this Court. He simply discusses the Democratic primary and posits his theory that President Obama is not a citizen of the United States. As such, Plaintiff offers no reason that he should be entitled to relief from the prior judgment of this Court…”

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 66 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
23.

Jurisdiction Louisiana
*Judd prohibited from filing here.43

Court Decision on Motion "It is ordered that Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment is denied as petitioner has presented no legal grounds for relief."

Judd v. La. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 2:11-cv-01501KDE-JCW (E.D. La Aug. 24, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. La. Secy’ of St. et al, No. 3:11-cv-00870RGJ-KLH (W.D. La. Aug. 10, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

RECAP | PACER

24.

Louisiana
*Judd prohibited from filing here.

RECAP | PACER

“IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd’s “Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment; And Motion to Amend for Court Order to Register All Convicted and Incarcerated Felons to Vote in All Federal Elections and Caucuses and Democratic National Convention; and For Order to Remove Barack Obama from State’s 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot/Caucus and Award All Delegates to Keith Judd, Democratic Presidential Candidate” [Doc. No. 21] is DENIED. As of this date, Judd has not provided the Court with evidence that he paid the sanctions ordered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Further, his case is now on appeal to that court.” No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Judd v. Secretary of State of Louisiana et al, No. 3:2011-cv-00393 (M.D. La.)

Louisiana *Judd prohibited from filing here. RECAP | PACER

43

See Judd v. Sec'y of State of Louisiana, No. 11–30920, 461 F. App'x 399, 401 (5th Cir. 2012) (“Judd is ORDERED to pay a sanction in the amount of $500 to the clerk of this court. Even after satisfaction of all sanction orders, Judd may not file any civil action in a district court of this circuit, or any pleading or notice of appeal with this court, without first obtaining leave of the court in which he seeks to file such action, pleading, or notice. When seeking leave of court, Judd must certify that the claim he wishes to present is a new one that has never before either been raised and disposed of on the merits or remains pending in any federal court. Upon failure thus to certify or upon false certification, Judd may be sanctioned and punished accordingly.”)
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 67 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
25.

Jurisdiction Maine RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion “On June 30, 2011, I adopted the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge and Ordered this lawsuit dismissed for lack of prosecution. Judgment entered against the plaintiff on July 1, 2011. On July 12, 2011, I denied his motion to reopen the case and his motion to stay. The plaintiff appealed and on January 10, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit dismissed his appeal as untimely. Now on August 2, 2012, he has filed a “Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment; and Motion to Amend for Court Order to Register All Convicted and Incarcerated Felons to Vote in All Federal Elections and Caucuses and Democratic National Convention; and for Order to Remove Barack Obama from State’s 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot/Caucus and Award All Delegates to Keith Judd, Democratic Presidential Candidate.” (ECF No. 23). The motion is DENIED. Final judgment has already been entered in the case and his appeal was dismissed. The Twenty-fourth Amendment provides no basis for opening a case that has already been closed.”

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Maine, No. 11-cv-00212 (D. Me. Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

26.

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Maryland, No. 11-cv-01447-RDB (D. Maryland Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. Sec’y of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, No. 11-mc-009407 (D. Mass.) (dismissed as frivolous)
No case found No case found

Maryland RECAP | PACER

Docket Text Only: “ORDER Denying 15 Motion for Relief From Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard D Bennett on 08/03/2012. (Entered: 08/03/2012)”

Massachusetts RECAP | PACER
Michigan Minnesota

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

No case found No case found

27.

Judd v. Missouri et al, No. 2:11-cv-04146-ODS (W.D. Mo. Aug 27, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Missouri RECAP | PACER

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Relief from Judgment and other various motions. Defendant has not responded and the time for doing so has passed. Plaintiff’s motions raise arguments that have been repeatedly rejected and offers no reason justifying a different outcome. Plaintiff’s motions are denied.

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 68 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
28.

Jurisdiction Mississippi *Judd prohibited from filing here.44 RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion “It is hereby ordered that plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment is denied as patently frivolous.”

Judd v. Secretary of State of Mississippi et al, No. 3:2011-cv-00351 (S.D. Miss. Aug.23, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. Secretary of State of Mississippi et al, No. 1:2011-cv-00138 (N.D. Miss., Motion filed Aug. 6, 2012) Judd v. Secretary of State of Montana et al, No. 11-cv-00080 (D. Mont. Aug. 2, 2012 order) (striking motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

29.

Mississippi *Judd prohibited from filing here. RECAP | PACER Montana RECAP | PACER

Docket does not reflect an order addressing motion, but appeal – apparently re: pending motion – has been filed – and subsequently dismissed for want of prosecution. “On May 27, 2011, this Court issued an Order denying Mr. Judd's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis based upon the three strikes provision of28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This Order provided that no motions for reconsideration or rehearing would be entertained. Dkt.4. Judgment was entered on May 27, 2011. Dkt. 5. Mr. Judd filed a Notice of Appeal on September 21,2011. Dkt. 9. On October 18, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued an Order finding that the appeal was so insubstantial as to not warrant further review and no motions for reconsideration would be considered. Dkt. 10. This matter is has been closed for over a year and this Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals have indicated that no motions for reconsideration would be considered.”

30.

No case found
31.

Nebraska

No case found

Judd v. Nev. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00853JCM –PAL (D. Nev. Aug. 6, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Nevada RECAP | PACER

“Mr. Judd has failed to establish any of the three factors for reconsideration. Instead, approximately eight months after this court entered its order, Mr. Judd has filed a motion seeking to reinstate the lawsuit on the same grounds, and arguing the same theories45, that were previously dismissed as frivolous. The court conducted a de novo review of Mr. Judd’s contentions at the time it affirmed the magistrate’s report and recommendation, has done so again, and continues to find Mr. Judd’s contentions lacking ‘an arguable basis in law and fact.’”

44

See Judd v. Sec'y of State of Louisiana, No. 11–30920, 461 F. App'x 399, 401 (5th Cir. 2012) (“Judd is ORDERED to pay a sanction in the amount of $500 to the clerk of this court. Even after satisfaction of all sanction orders, Judd may not file any civil action in a district court of this circuit, or any pleading or notice of appeal with this court, without first obtaining leave of the court in which he seeks to file such action, pleading, or notice. When seeking leave of court, Judd must certify that the claim he wishes to present is a new one that has never before either been raised and disposed of on the merits or remains pending in any federal court. Upon failure thus to certify or upon false certification, Judd may be sanctioned and punished accordingly.”)
45

Note that prior order did not address any claim regarding Obama’s status as “natural born citizen,”
Page 69 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
32.

Jurisdiction New Hampshire RECAP | PACER
New Jersey

Court Decision on Motion Unclear – docket does not reflect an order addressing motion, but appeal – apparently re: pending motion – has been filed.
No case found

Judd v. N.H. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 1:11-fp-00259 (D.N.H., motion filed Aug. 6, 2012)
No case found

Judd v. Lappin et al, No. 1:2011-cv-00400 (D.N.M.) Judd v. Lappin et al, No. 1:2011-cv-00290 (D.N.M.)
33.

New Mexico RECAP | PACER New Mexico RECAP | PACER New York

Motion not reflected on docket. No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. Pending

Judd v. State Election Board of New York et al, No. 1:11-cv-00571-DNH-RFT (N.D.N.Y., motion filed Aug. 2, 2012) RECAP | PACER Judd v. State Election Board of New York et al, No. 1:2011-cv-04242 (S.D.N.Y.) Judd v. State Election Board of New York et al, No. 6:2011-cv-06286 (W.D.N.Y.) Judd v. State Bd. Of Elections of N. Carolina, No. 1:2011-cv-00488 (M.D.N.C.)

New York RECAP | PACER New York RECAP | PACER North Carolina RECAP | PACER North Dakota) RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. Recommendation: “…On August 6, 2012, Judd filed a document with the court captioned “Motion for Relief from Judgement or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment; and Motion to Amend for Court Order to Register All Convicted and Incarcerated Felons to Vote in All Federal Elections and Caucuses and Democratic National Convention; and for Order to Remove Barack Obama from State’s 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot/Caucus and Award All Delegates to Keith Judd, Democratic Presidential Candidate.” *** In his motion, Judd does not assert any of above enumerated grounds for granting him relief or otherwise show exceptional circumstances warranting such relief. Rather, he reasserts the claims set forth in his proposed complaint and further asserts a challenge to President Obama’s citizenship. Rule 60(b) is “not a vehicle for simple reargument on the merits.” Broadway v. Norris, 193 F.3d 987, 990 (8th Cir. 1999). Given Judd’s failure to demonstrate the existence of any exceptional circumstances, the undersigned finds no basis for granting Judd the relief he seeks. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that his motion (Docket No. 19) be DENIED.”

34.

Judd v. Secretary of State of North Dakota et al, No. 1:2011-cv-00053 (D.N.D. Aug. 13, 2012 recommendation and order) (recommendation to deny motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds), order adopting Recommendation (Sept. 4, 2012)

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 70 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
35.

Jurisdiction Ohio RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion Order summarized in docket: “Order Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. No. 14 ) is denied. Further, the Clerk is directed to return, unfiled, any additional filings tendered by Plaintiff in this case. Finally, Plaintiff is hereby forewarned that the filing of any new frivolous actions in this Court may, without further notice, result in an order enjoining him from filing cases here without obtaining leave of court.” The August 3, 2012 Motion [Doc. No. 32] is denied. The judgment [Doc. No. 33] from which Plaintiff purports to seek relief is a judgment dismissing this action without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s Order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directing payment of the filing fee required to proceed with this action. In the current motion, Plaintiff fails to address any of the bases for the Order and the subsequent Judgment. Instead, he asserts arguments having nothing to do with the requirements for in forma pauperis status or the findings set out in the July 30, 2012 Order and subsequent Judgment. The August 23, 2012 Motion [Doc. No. 38] is stricken, as it is merely a duplicate of the August 3, 2012 Motion. On August 8, 2012, or more than ten (10) months after dismissal of the appeal, Plaintiff filed a “motion for relief from judgment or order under Twenty Fourth Amendment” (Dkt. # 16). He requests the Court to order, inter alia, that all convicted and incarcerated felons be registered to vote, that President Barack Obama be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot, and that all delegates be award to Plaintiff. Plaintiff never paid the $350 filing fee for this action. This Court has determined, on numerous occasions, that Plaintiff is subject to the three-strikes rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). He has not provided any relevant legal authority to support a claim that the statute is unconstitutional or does not apply to him. For all the reasons discussed in prior Orders (Dkt. #s 3 and 7), the Court finds that Plaintiff’s arguments asserted in his motion for relief from judgment under the Twenty Fourth Amendment are frivolous and without merit. His motion shall be denied.” Docket Entry: “MINUTE ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White denying 17 Motion for Relief (dma, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/07/2012)”

Judd v. Secretary of State of Ohio et al, No. 1:11cv-01200-SL (D. Ohio Aug. 6, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. Oklahoma State Election Board et al, No. 5:11-cv-00624 (W.D. Okla, Oct. 1, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

36.

Oklahoma RECAP | PACER

37.

Judd v. Oklahoma State Election Board et al, No. 4:11-cv-00331-GKF-PJC (N.D. Okla. Aug. 29, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Oklahoma RECAP | PACER

38.

Judd v. Oklahoma State Election Board et al, No. 11-cv-00183 (E.D. Okla. Aug. 7, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Oklahoma RECAP | PACER

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 71 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
39.

Jurisdiction Oregon RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion “Plaintiff initiated this suit on May 25, 2011, seeking an injunction forcing his placement on Oregon's 2012 presidential primary election ballot and a declaration that convicted felons have a right to vote in the primary. Plaintiff also sought in forma pauperis (IFP) status which the court denied without prejudice due to a failure to provide the correct form. After the court provided plaintiff with the correct form, plaintiff refused to complete the application and the court dismissed the case on July 15, 2011. On September 16, 2011, plaintiff appealed. On October 18, 2011, the Ninth Circuit found the appeal "so insubstantial as to not warrant further review." On October 20, 2011, plaintiff sought leave to appeal IFP. The court denied the motion in light of the previous orders in the case. Plaintiff now seeks relief from the judgment and an order to register all convicted/incarcerated felons to vote in all 2012 elections and to remove Barack Obama from Oregon's presidential ballot. To date, plaintiff has not paid a filing fee or obtained IFP status. However, in anticipation of a denial of the motion, plaintiff has already filed a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. To the extent this court still has jurisdiction to rule on the motion, the motion is denied.”

Judd v. Secretary of State of Oregon et al, No. 6:11-cv-06176-HO (D. Or. Sept. 7, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

40.

Judd v. Pa. Dept. of St. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00773JFC-CRE (W.D. Pa. Sept. 10, 2012 Order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds); Judd v. Pa. Dept. of St. et al, No. 2:11-cv-03849CMR (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Pennsylvania RECAP | PACER

Text only entry in docket: “ORDER denying as moot 17 Motion to Amend/Correct for the reasons stated in this Court's Order of December 21, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on September 10, 2012. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (Eddy, Cynthia) (Entered: 09/10/2012)” “AND NOW, this 1st day of August 2012, upon receipt of Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under the Twenty-Fourth Amendment [Doc. No. 11], and upon review of the Docket in this case, the Court finds it is without jurisdiction to rule on Plaintiff’s Motion as Plaintiff has not filed a Complaint, and thus has not properly raised a case and controversy upon which the Court can grant relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.” [1] The case was closed on June 21, 2011, as Plaintiff had failed to pay the filing fee or properly request in forma pauperis status. On November 17, 2011, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen and Stay proceedings was also denied for failure to pay the filing fee or properly request in forma pauperis status. This deficiency was never corrected, and no complaint has ever been filed.”

41.

Pennsylvania RECAP | PACER

No case found

Puerto Rico

No case found

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 72 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
No case found No case found

Jurisdiction
Rhode Island South Carolina

Court Decision on Motion
No case found No case found

Judd v. Secretary of State of South Dakota et al, No. 4:2011-cv-04080 (D.S.D.)
42.

South Dakota RECAP | PACER Tennessee RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. “Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd is an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institute in Texarkana, Texas. After the court denied the plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the plaintiff failed to submit the $350 filing fee, this matter was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal for want of prosecution on January 20, 2012. Now before the court is a motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 25). The plaintiff does not specify under which rule of civil procedure the motion was filed, but the court construes the motion as filed pursuant to Rule 60(b). *** The present motion does not present any basis for reconsideration of the judgment previously entered against the plaintiff, and certainly does not address any of the grounds recognized by Rule 60 as providing a legitimate reason for relief from judgment. The plaintiff’s motion is utterly frivolous, and the court declines to consider it. The motion (ECF No. 25) is hereby DENIED. Further, the plaintiff is given notice that this case is CLOSED and he SHALL NOT submit any more filings in this action. The Clerk of Court is is DIRECTED not to accept any additional filings in this action.”

Judd v. Dept. of State of Tennessee et al, No. 3:2011-cv-00555 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 8, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

43.

Judd v. Dept. of State of Tennessee et al, No. 11cv-00244 (E.D. Tenn. Motion filed Aug. 6, 2012)

Tennessee RECAP | PACER

Docket does not reflect an order addressing motion, but appeal – apparently re: pending motion – has been filed – and dismissed; docket notation states “NOTICE OF APPEAL as to Order by Keith Russell Judd. (The order denying the motion for relief 12 [subject of appeal – birther motion for reconsideration] does not exist.) (AYB) (Entered: 09/05/2012)”. No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. But see:

Judd v. Secretary of State for the State of Texas, No. 3:2012-cv-01113 (N.D. Tex.)

Texas
*Judd prohibited from filing in TXt.46

RECAP | PACER
46

See Judd v. Sec'y of State of Louisiana, No. 11–30920, 461 F. App'x 399, 401 (5th Cir. 2012) (“Judd is ORDERED to pay a sanction in the amount of $500 to the clerk of this court. Even after satisfaction of all sanction orders, Judd may not file any civil action in a district court of this circuit, or any pleading or notice of appeal with this court, without
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 73 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
44.

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion In re Judd, No. 03-12-00617-CV, 2012 WL 6097294 (Tex. App. Dec. 7, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to appellate court which asserted same birther claims as presented in the various August 2012 “motions for reconsideration” filed in federal courts)

In re Judd, No. 03-12-00617-CV, 2012 WL 6097294 (Tex. App. Dec. 7, 2012)

No case found No case found

Utah Vermont

No case found No case found

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al, No. 1:2011-cv-01325 (E.D. Va.)
45.

Virginia RECAP | PACER Virginia RECAP | PACER Washington RECAP | PACER West Virginia RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. Pending

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al, Civil Case No. 7:11-cv-00258-JCT (W.D. Va., motion filed Aug. 2, 2012) Judd v. Secretary of State of Washington et al, 2:11-cv-00214-WFN (E.D. Wash., motion filed Aug. 1, 2012 ) Judd v. Secretary of State of West Virginia et al, No. 1:11-cv-00093-IMK –JES (N.D. W. Va., Oct. 5, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

46.

Pending

47.

On January 18, 2012, the Court entered an Order and Judgment adopting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert, and dismissing without prejudice the pro se petitioner Keith Russell Judd’s (“Judd”) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint (dkt. no. 14). More than six months later, on August 2, 2012, Judd filed the pending motion seeking, inter alia, relief from judgment. (Dkt. No. 18). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) provides that a court may, upon motion or upon such terms as are just, relieve a party from a final judgment, order, or proceeding … *** Here, Judd has failed to specify what provision of Rule 60(b), if any, he relies upon for his motion. Instead, he simply reiterates the same frivolous arguments the Court rejected over six months ago. Accordingly, the Court DENIES his motion (dkt. no. 18).”

48.

Judd v. Secretary of State of West Virginia et al, No. 2:2011-cv-00369 (S.D. W.Va. motion filed Aug. 2, 2012);
No case found

West Virginia RECAP | PACER
Wisconsin

Docket does not reflect an order addressing motion, but appeal – apparently re: pending motion – has been filed – but apparently disregarded as “premature.”
No case found

first obtaining leave of the court in which he seeks to file such action, pleading, or notice. When seeking leave of court, Judd must certify that the claim he wishes to present is a new one that has never before either been raised and disposed of on the merits or remains pending in any federal court. Upon failure thus to certify or upon false certification, Judd may be sanctioned and punished accordingly.”)
Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012 Page 74 of 75 WhatsYourEvidence.com

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE
Case Citation / Status
49.

Jurisdiction Wyoming RECAP | PACER Virgin Islands RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion

Judd v. Wyoming Sec’y of State, No. 11-cv-00202 (D. Wyo. Nov. 26, 2012) (denying motion as patently frivolous) Judd v. St. Bd. of Elections, No. 3:11-cv-00063CVG-RM (D. Virgin Islands, motion filed Aug. 6, 2012);

The motion by Plaintiff is, on it's face, patently frivolous. … The motion by Plaintiff is thus not only utterly frivolous, it is, after the November 6, 2012, general election, clearly moot.
Docket does not reflect an order addressing motion, but appeal – apparently re: pending motion – has been filed – and subsequently dismissed for failure to pay filing fee.

50.

Last Updated: Dec. 21, 2012

Page 75 of 75

WhatsYourEvidence.com