You are on page 1of 6

279 KNm

P F Frame Analysis

NP P 40 400 W P

P 30a C 400 =1.5x9. 1 High High P BedT Existin Existing Lateral b River Point

To check the effect from vertical and lateral loads, frame analysis was done using the computer package "ETAB". When considering the whole building, frames in "Y" direction are the critical frames. Hence a full frame analysis done for frame 7(A-K) is detailed here. To consider alternate span loading and lateral load effects in "Y" direction, eight static load cases were selected. Another two static load cases were selected to represent the loading in "X" direction. To reprent alternate span loading in "Y" direction, two static load cases for Dead loads as Dead 1 (D1) and Dead2 (D2); and two static load cases for Live loads as Live 1 (L1) and Live 2 (L2); were selected. Wind 1(W1) static case was taken for Wind flows from front side of building and Wind 2 static case was taken for the wind flows from rear side of building. Static load cases " N1" and "N2" was taken to consider notinal horizontal loads to the building. When notional load is critical than factored wind force, unfactored notional loads were taken instead to Wind force, as per Cl. 3.1.4.2 of BS 8110 To get the axial force which exerted from the "X" direction of the frame, two static cases called, Dead 3 (D3) and Live 3 (L3) were taken to consideration. Static Load Cases: Dead 1 (D1) To represent the alternate span loading Dead 2 (D2) in "Y" direction. Dead3 (D3) - To represent the loading exerted from "X " direction. Live 1 (L1) To represent the alternate span loading Live2 (L2) in "Y" direction. Live 3 (L3) - To represent the loading exerted from "X " direction. Wind 1 (W1) To represent the wind loading in front Wind 2 (W2) and rear in "Y" direction. Notinal Loads (N1) To represent the notinal loading Notinal Loads (N2) in front and rear in "Y" direction.

BS 8110 Cl. 3.1.4.2

Dead

Live

Lateral loads

From above static load cases, following seven load combinations were taken to consideration.

Project : Dahampaya
DESIGN UNIT D E C EPC DIVISION
CENTRAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY BUREAU

Feature Designed Checked Job Code

Frame Analysis Date Date D-676 Page 01 of 08

4 1 8

4 1 0 8 0 0 0 ( a ( p a p r p o r x o . x ) . )

Reference

Calculation

Output

279 KNm

P F

400 NP P 40 P W

P 30a C 400 =1.5x9. 1 High High P BedT Existin Existing Lateral b River Point

Load safety factors in Combinations:

Load Combinatio ns BS 8110 T-2.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Static load case in "Y" direction Dead load D1 D2 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 Live load L1 L2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.2 Wind load W1 W2 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.2

Static load case in "X" Notional Dead Live N1 N2 D3 L3 1.4 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.2

1.0 1.0 -

Calculation of Dead loads and Imposed loads: Design loads for supporting beams were calculated by using shear co-efficients of two way spaning slabs. Specimen calculation for frame on grid 7 (A-K) at First floor level: For Span K-J: Dead Load Load from slab (0.4x4x3.6)+(0.36x4x3.6) Load from beam (0.3x0.375x24) No wall load is present at this span Load from finishes (0.4x4x1)+(0.36x4x1) Total dead load = 3.0 kN/m = 16.6 kN/m = 10.9kN/m

= 2.7 kN/m

Project : Dahampaya
DESIGN UNIT D E C EPC DIVISION
CENTRAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY BUREAU

Feature Designed Checked Job Code

Frame Analysis Date Date D-676 Page 02 of 08

4 1 8

4 1 0 8 0 0 0 ( a ( p a p r p o r x o . x ) . )

Reference

Calculation

Output

279 KNm

P F

NP P 40 400 W P

P 30a C 400 =1.5x9. 1 High High P BedT Existin Existing Lateral b River Point

Imposed load Imposed load for general office area Imposed load for span K-J (0.4x4x3.5)+ (0.36x4x3.5) = 3.5 kN/m2 = 10.6kN/m

Simillary for other spans and other floors dead loads and imposed loads were calculated. Specimen calculations for beam 7(K-A) of Ground floor and First floor are attached here with in Figure 4-1 and Figure 4-2.. Wind loads were also calculated for frame on grid 7(A-K) according to the CP-3 Chapter V to evaluate horizontal loads.

Project : Dahampaya
DESIGN UNIT D E C EPC DIVISION
CENTRAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY BUREAU

Feature Designed Checked Job Code

Frame Analysis Date Date D-676 Page 03 of 08

4 1 8

4 1 0 8 0 0 0 ( a ( p a p r p o r x o . x ) . )

Reference

Calculation

Output

279 KNm

P F

400 NP P 40 P W

P 30a C 400 =1.5x9. 1 High High P BedT Existin Existing Lateral b River Point

4 1 8

4 1 0 8 0 0 0 ( a ( p a p r p o r x o . x ) . )

Reference

Calculation

Output

279 KNm

P F

400 NP P 40 P W

P 30a C 400 =1.5x9. 1 High High P BedT Existin Existing Lateral b River Point

4 1 8

4 1 0 8 0 0 0 ( a ( p a p r p o r x o . x ) . )

Reference

Calculation

Output

Reference

Calculation

Outputs

Project
D E C DESIGN UNIT EPC DIVISION CENTRAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANCY BUREAU (CECB)

279 KNm

P F

Feature Designed Date Checked Date of Job Code Page NP P P P 3 0a C 400 =1.5x9. 400x 400 13 High High P P P BedT Existin W Existing Lateral b River Point
4 1 8

4 1 0 8 0 0 0 ( a ( p a p r p o r x o . x ) . )