Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

848 views

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Investment Detective
- Final Case 2 Nike Inc.
- Analysis Slides-WACC Nike
- Nike, Inc Cheats Kimi Ford
- Nike Case Study
- The Investment Detective
- NIKE,INC COST OF CAPITAL
- Nike Assignment
- Nike Inc.ppt
- Investment Detective Case
- Case Study Nike, Inc. - Cost of Capital
- NIKE Inc Cost of Capital _ Financial Management
- Jetblue
- Nike Case Study-Response
- Nike, Inc Cost of Capital Case Study
- Nike Case - Team 5 Windsor - Final
- Nike Inc. Cost of Capital Case Analysis
- Nike Cost of Capital
- Nike Case Final Group 4 (1)
- Nike, Inc

You are on page 1of 7

CORPORATE FINANCE

1/4/2013

Submitted by

TWINKLE JAIN- 2012343 UDIT MITTAL-2012344 UJJAWAL ASHOK BAID-2012345 UMANG RITOLIA-2012346 UPENDRA.KS-2012347 UTKARSH SHRIVASTAVA-2012348

Submitted To

Dr.KULBIR SINGH

Group 5 Section F

Contents

SUMMARY OF CASE ................................................................................................................................ 2 NIKEs PLAN ......................................................................................................................................... 2 WACC CALCULATION........................................................................................................................... 2 MARKET VALUES OF DEBT AND EQUITY ......................................................................................... 2 Cost of DEBT and EQUITY using CAPM :.......................................................................................... 3 Cost of Equity using DIVIDED DISCOUNT MODEL ........................................................................... 4 Cost of Equity using EARNING CAPITALISATION MODEL: ............................................................... 4 LIQUIDITY RATIO: ................................................................................................................................ 4 CONCLUSION:.......................................................................................................................................... 6

Group 5 Section F

SUMMARY OF CASE

Portfolio manager Kimi Ford of NorthPoint group is very much confused whether to buy Nikes stock. Nike has experienced sales growth decline in income from almost $800 million to $580 million and market share had fallen from 48% in 1997 to 42% in 2000. In addition recent supply chain issues and adverse effect of a strong dollar had a negatively effect on revenue.

NIKEs PLAN

To boost revenue Nike wants to develop more athletic-shoe products in mid-priced segments. Nike also plans to push its apparel line. On cost side, Nike would exert more effort on expense control. Finally company reiterated their long term revenue growth targets of 8% to 10% and earnings growth targets of above 15%. Kimi Ford read all the reports of Nike and now is confused. Lehman Brothers report recommended a strong buy of shares while an USB Warburg and CSFB analyst recommends a hold of buying shares. Hence Kimi ford develops his own discounted cash flow forecast.

WACC CALCULATION

The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the rate (expressed as a percentage, like interest) that a company is expected to pay to debt holders (cost of debt) and shareholders (cost of equity) to finance its assets. It is the minimum return that a company must earn on existing asset base to satisfy its creditors, owners, and other providers of capital. Companies raise money from a number of sources: common equity, preferred equity, straight debt, convertible debt, exchangeable debt, warrants, and options, pension liabilities, executive stock options, governmental subsidies, and so on. WACC is calculated taking into account the relative weights of each component of the capital structure- debt and equity, and is used to see if the investment is worthwhile to undertake

WACC

=

WACC = (

Cost of DEBT

Cost of Equity

MARKET VALUES OF DEBT AND EQUITY Market value of equity (E) = current market price of share * current share outstanding = 42.09* 271.5 = 11427.435 Market value of Debt (D) = long term debt (discounted) + notes payable + current liability = x(408.337) + 432.0 + 5.4 = 1269.037 Weight of debt = 1269.037 / (11427.435 + 1269.037) = .09995 (9.995 %) Weight of equity = 11427.435 / (11427.435 + 1269.037) = .90005 (90.005%)

Group 5 Section F Cost of DEBT and EQUITY using CAPM : Using Capital asset pricing model we shall calculate the cost of equity.

The next issue at hand is finding the correct costs of debt and equity in order to find an accurate calculation of WACC. Because there is no other given yield that is comparable to a 25-year valuation period, our risk free rate used in calculations is 5.74%. Therefore = 5.74 %

There are two historical equity risk premiums given for a time period from 1926 to 1999: Geometric mean and arithmetic mean. The geometric mean is a better estimate for longer life valuation while the arithmetic mean is better for a one-year estimated expected return. Therefore, we chose to use the geometric mean to coincide with the choice to use the 20-year yield on U.S. Treasuries, which is 5.9%. Therefore market risk premium = 5.9 % Next we turn our attention to calculate . As it is given that average value of is 0.8 we take that value in our calculation. Therefore = 0.8

= 0.1046 (10.46%) Cost of debt was calculated by finding the yield to maturity on 20-year Nike Inc. debt with a 6.75% coupon semi-annually. We assumed Nike Inc. to have a single cost of capital since its multiple business segments (shoes, apparel, sports equipment, etc.) are not very different and would experience similar risks and betas. 956 = The value of can be calculated using the formula

( )

where

M = maturity amount P = current market price of the bond C = coupon amount (6.75 % of 1000 = 67.5) N = maturity period (for semi-annual bond its n*2 (40))

or Effective

7.137.

Group 5 Section F WACC = ( WACC = = 0.0948 or 9.483% Cost of Equity using DIVIDED DISCOUNT MODEL The assumption made with this model is that the company pays a substantial dividend, but Nike Inc. does not. Therefore, we rejected this model because it does not reflect the true cost of capital. The calculation is as follows: where D is the divided expected to be paid, is the current market price of share is 42.09 and is 0.48 . ) ( )

and g is the growth rate of divided. It is given that g is forecasted as 5.5% , Hence substituting in above equation we get

Cost of Equity using EARNING CAPITALISATION MODEL: The final model used to compute the cost of capital was the earning capitalization model. The problem with this model is that it does not take into consideration the growth of the company. Therefore we chose to reject this calculation. The earnings capitalization model calculations were found this way ECM = where is earning per share for next period and is current market price of share. Substituting the values ECM = = = 0.05511 or 5.511%

LIQUIDITY RATIO:

Current ratio is used to estimate the solvency of company in short term. The current ratio of 2:1 represents a highly solvent position. Current ratio = = = = 2.029 for the year 2001 = 1.68 for the year 2000

Liquidity ratio is good for the year 2001 since the Nike can able to meet is assets with its current liability.

Group 5 Section F ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES of various methods used in calculating Cost of Equity METHODS ADVANTAGES More realistic since it considers only systematic risk More theoretically derived relation between risk and market premium Good flexibility when estimating future dividend streams DISADVANTAGES Its difficult in calculating beta for all projects People sometimes focus on market risk to exclusion of corporate risk and make mistakes Subjective inputs can result in miss specified models and bad results COST OF EQUITY

CAPM

10.46%

6.64%

Provides value approximation even when the inputs are overly simplified Avoids force fit assumptions into the model Allows sensitivity testing and analysing market reactions to changing circumstances Very easy to calculate

Not good for growing firms but appropriate for no-growth firms.

5.51%

Following are the reasons to why it is important to estimate a firms cost:Capital Budgeting Decision: It is important to estimate a firms cost of capital to decide Capital Budgeting Decision. Cost of capital is used to decide whether an investment proposal should be undertaken or not. A wrong estimation of WACC would lead to selection of a wrong investment or rejecting a good investment proposal. Method of financing decision: The WACC can be observed constantly to see the market changes in interest rate on load and dividend rates on stocks to make a better choice of the source of financing when the firm needs financing. The idea here is to minimize the cost of capital based on market changes.

Group 5 Section F Firms Performance: This can also be used as a measure to evaluate the performance of the firm based on comparing the returns that it is getting from a selected project and the cost it is incurring in raising the finance for this project.

CONCLUSION:

When Joanna Cohen used the cost of capital as 8.4%, as per the sensitivity analysis the price of share becomes $63.50, but the current market price of the share is 42.09. Hence the share is undervalued for $21.41. As per our calculation by WACC (9.438%) using CAPM model the sensitivity analysis report points the price of share is $55.68 while the current market price of the share is 42.09. Hence it is under-valued by $13.59. By the above analysis we conclude the NIKE INC can be added to North Point group portfolio since the prices are under-valued. Management of NIKE INC is also planning for profit maximizing and cost reduction techniques. All of the plans laid out at the executive meeting display that the company is heading on the recovery path and there is potential for abnormal profits given the growth capacity that Nike has got as elaborated by ratio analysis.

- Investment DetectiveUploaded byforeverktm
- Final Case 2 Nike Inc.Uploaded byMichelle Maayo
- Analysis Slides-WACC NikeUploaded byOng Pei Chin
- Nike, Inc Cheats Kimi FordUploaded byamethyst_arr
- Nike Case StudyUploaded byjmatsanura1
- The Investment DetectiveUploaded byAnindita Listyaningrum
- NIKE,INC COST OF CAPITALUploaded bySilvia Regina
- Nike AssignmentUploaded bynazareth920
- Nike Inc.pptUploaded byRahul Sttud
- Investment Detective CaseUploaded byWidyawan Widarto 闘志
- Case Study Nike, Inc. - Cost of CapitalUploaded byabrown5_csustan
- NIKE Inc Cost of Capital _ Financial ManagementUploaded byAnung Triningrum
- JetblueUploaded bykatrina
- Nike Case Study-ResponseUploaded byAnurag Sukhija
- Nike, Inc Cost of Capital Case StudyUploaded byChristine Son
- Nike Case - Team 5 Windsor - FinalUploaded byalosada01
- Nike Inc. Cost of Capital Case AnalysisUploaded byrmdelmando
- Nike Cost of CapitalUploaded bySaahil Ledwani
- Nike Case Final Group 4 (1)Uploaded byMonika Maheshwari
- Nike, IncUploaded byRavi Prakash
- Nike Case AnalysisUploaded byUyen Thao Dang
- Case Nike Cost of Capital - FinalUploaded byNick Chongsanguan
- Nike, Inc. Cost of CapitalUploaded byYosua Taniasurya
- Nike Cost of CapitalUploaded byMashhood Ahmad
- Nike Cost of CapitalUploaded byYou Vee
- nike incUploaded byitsmandeepsethi
- Teletech Corporation 2005 Case SolutionUploaded byAmrita Sharma
- 2016-01-1720161144CasoUploaded byGiselli Castillo Gárate
- Case Solutions for Case Studies in Finance Managing for Corporate Value Creation 6th Edition by BrunerUploaded byGregory Wilson
- Duckworth Industries,Inc-Incentive Compensation ProgramsUploaded byMuhammad Faisal Hayat

- 2013 Annual Report (Financial Statements)Uploaded byDhel Lopez Evite
- legy107.pdfUploaded byDiwakar Dhillon
- Jitihada II Business Plan Competition _ Sponsorship Package 2011Uploaded byMahea
- Ch07_lecnote.docUploaded byAKINYEMI ADISA KAMORU
- Curriculum Vitae.[1][1]Uploaded byJohn Powell
- ICWAUploaded bySurinder Yadav
- Learning for Success (LfS): Sajeevta FoundationUploaded byGautam Patel
- Todaro1997_Urbanization, Unemployment, and Migration in Africa- Theory and Policy#urbanization in Africa#Uploaded byJulian Mueller-Schwefe
- Credit CardUploaded bysuryakantshrotriya
- GE273 Homework Week3Uploaded byMrDiaz
- Strategic Management Lecture 2009.pdfUploaded byIlham Sipala
- 12012017 Executive SummaryUploaded byHarold Huggins
- zara_caseUploaded byNeeraj Kumar Ravi
- Intrinsic Stock Value FCFF on JNJ stockUploaded byviettuan91
- Q1Uploaded byanjalikapoor
- BartelsUploaded byDanielMendez
- Case Study on GrameenPhoneUploaded byMohammad Raihanul Hasan
- bri59689_ch02_webUploaded byPhillip Ho
- Where Everyday is an April Fool's DayUploaded byBharat Sahni
- 0324180187_11Uploaded byVivek Thakur
- CEDA_Women in LeadershipUploaded bysmashed_zero353
- Titman, S., Dan B. Trueman. 1986. Information Quality and the Valuation of New Issues. Journal of Accounting and Economics.Uploaded byMira Eka Irianti
- Finance T1 answer.pdfUploaded bychoco
- wells fargo checkingUploaded byodizl
- Dufferin Construction Company Job Offer (2)Uploaded byHimani Pandey
- 31498694-SWOT-ANALYSIS-Between-Two-Great-competitors-LUX-vs-Dove.docUploaded byMuhammad Asim Hafeez Thind
- Friends and Family Rewards ProgramUploaded byNicole Andrzejewska
- Internal Audit and ERMUploaded byZuhair Naqvi
- Sales Supervisor Job DescriptionUploaded byDe Silva Shmapk
- Fall 2016 Macro 1Uploaded byctyre34