This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Philosophical frameworks in the social sciences — understandingsociety.blogspot.com — Readability
Philosophical frameworks in the social sciences
by DANIEL LITTLE • MARCH 26, 2009
It is fairly evident that there were substantive ontological assumptions about how the social world worked that guided the founders of sociology: individuals create social outcomes (Mill), norms and values have a superordinate role in social action (Durkheim), the problem of social order is the fundamental problem for sociology (Durkheim), crises are common within capitalism (Marx), social events are meaningful and historically particular (Dilthey), modern society is marked by impersonal social institutions (Tönnies) .... Assumptions at this level guided the thinking of specific theorists as they developed conceptual schemes in terms of which to understand the social world and advanced theories about how the social world worked. We should therefore not imagine that the social sciences developed as an abstract, logical solution to a simple problem, as perhaps naive empiricism might have suggested: identify the domain of social phenomena that constitute the declared subject matter of a given discipline of social science; examine and classify the phenomena so as to discover whatever regularities are to be found among them; formulate theoretical hypotheses about the laws that govern these phenomena; and explain the patterns and events that are discovered as the consequences of these hypothetical laws. Instead, each of the founders of the social sciences came to his or her studies with fairly specific pre-scientific ideas about what the domain of the social world was and how it should be explained. These ideas are both ontological and methodological; and all of them are contestable. Perhaps we might describe this framework as a “folk philosophy of knowledge” that is to some extent unexamined but that guides the pursuit of knowledge, the form that it takes, and the ways in which it is evaluated.
the historically particular over the law-like generalization.readability.constituted a powerful folk philosophy of science that was shared by Durkheim. 5.com/articles/y03mojau 2/3 . and the thinker's own experiences play a deeply important role in the development of sociological frameworks. by the opposition between orthodoxy and heterodoxy. This is why it is appropriate to https://www. but they are also partly metaphysical and epistemic.com — Readability German intellectual historian Fritz Ringer tries to locate Max Weber's intellectual origins within what he calls an "intellectual field" -. and the idea that the goal of science is the discovery of empirically supported lawlike generalizations -. And this question is particularly crucial at the beginning. and by the role of the cultural preconscious. Max Weber's Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences. non-causalist starting point for the "human sciences".the idea that the social sciences ought to resemble the natural sciences. And it emphasized the singular over the general.as he puts it. it looked at history and human affairs as a body of meaningful signs that required interpretation. of tacit 'doxa' that are transmitted by inherited practices. I think that Ringer is raising a question quite similar to mine here: what are the substantive reference points and conceptual presuppositions that the theorist brings to his theory and inquiry as he sets out. (See an earlier posting on non-naturalistic models of social science for more on the shortcomings of naturalism as a framework for social inquiry. The hermeneutic tradition derived from literary and biblical interpretation. The key point here should not be lost. But it differed profoundly from the epistemology of empiricism and positivism. Mill. hunches. a constellation further characterized by differences of power or authority.blogspot. The hermeneutic tradition was a strikingly different starting point for the rigorous investigation and explanation of social realities. and Comte. and social relations". Dilthey's hermeneutic philosophy offered a non-positivist. Naturalism and positivism -. institutions. The intellectual tradition that Dilthey absorbed and re-deployed as a basis for the human sciences was philosophically rigorous and committed to careful argumentation and interpretation. naturalism is unsurprising—even though it is profoundly misleading when applied to the social world. "a constellation of positions that are meaningful only in relation to one another. It is that the various efforts to forge a scientific theory of society are partly empirical and theoretical. Metaphors. later theorists are in turn formed by their readings and reactions to the theories and systems of the prior generation. p. grounded in pre-scientific assumptions about the nature of the social world and the nature of empirical study of society that are only partially expressed and are inherently debatable. pictures.) But naturalism and positivism were not the only substantive philosophical frameworks that influenced the first generation of the social sciences. Given the power of the natural sciences in the nineteenth century.3/24/12 Philosophical frameworks in the social sciences — understandingsociety.
3/24/12 Philosophical frameworks in the social sciences — understandingsociety.blogspot. we would have arrived at different sociologies. Here is a posting on the roots of the philosophy of social science and a posting on continental philosophy of social science that are relevant as well.com/2009/03/philosophical-frameworks-in-social.blogspot. A prior posting on philosophy and the social sciences addresses this issue as well." There are other starting points.html https://www. So engaging with the philosophy of social science is a fruitful way of trying to rethink the presuppositions of existing approaches to a "science of society". Original URL: http://understandingsociety.com/articles/y03mojau 3/3 .com — Readability refer to the "sociological imagination. and if we had started with different philosophical frameworks and different metaphors.readability.