This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

the flow nature and residence time. The advantage of having baffles is that it dissociates flow and imposes turbulence in it thus enhanced mixing which is necessary for many chemical reactions. So the position of the baffles affects the flow pattern, mixing, dead zones etc. For this purpose, a chemical species is injected in the baffled reactor with a concentration c and with a concentration burst. Observations were made to understand the above mentioned properties in both 2D and 3D model. The turbulent flow is solved with a stationary model and the transport of the chemical species is done in a time-dependent manner. Governing equations The flow takes place is turbulence. The governing equation is RANS equation.

The model is k-ε, it requires two additional equations to be solved along with the RANS equation. The k represents the total kinetic energy of the flow and the ε denotes the rate of dissipation of velocity fluctuation [the turbulent energy].

There are lot of models are in use to govern turbulence, but the choice is depend on the desired accuracy and available computation time. The species transport is governed by the mass transport equation and based on Euler’s approach the random component is included in the equation and the molecular diffusion is neglected.

The boundary region is solved by assuming wall function. Tl =0. the flow nature changed drastically between the 3rd and 4th baffle.028m. For flow through pipes.The random components are. it can be altered by replacing the term 3 with desired time in (a). The eddies formed inside the domain will enhance the mixing so it is desirable for most of the reactors to work efficiently but the eddy that formed in the exit affects the flow rate at the output and is undesirable. C = co * exp (-(t-3) ^2) (a) The exponential term controls the concentration burst. So. it increases the mesh refinement near the wall where maximum dissipation of turbulent energy takes place.e. i. while designing a reactor. c0 = 1 mol/m^3 is injected in the flow. For our choice of layout.07 * Dh = 0. with a concentration burst at the 3rd second. So. increases as the disturbance in the flow field increases. these kinds of facts should be given more importance to choose baffles layout. The inlet velocity is 0. as you can see that the stream lines got intensified. the turbulence nature of the flow increased whenever it crosses baffles.8% . The turbulence length scale is a quantity used to describe the size of large energy.7% of the hydraulic diameter. The dead zones were created in corners near the entrance and near the 1st and 2nd baffle. A chemical species of concentration. [Is equation (a) is a time varying boundary condition?] Turbulent flow profile: The stationery velocity profile obtained by solving the turbulence flow is displayed below. Because of random component solving becomes impossible. Closure approximation using eddy diffusivity is introduced.1 m/s and at the outlet the pressure is zero.containing in a turbulent flow. it is chosen between is 3. Here it is chosen as. . The figure shows that. Results in.

The figure also shows that. Analysis of concentration after different time of burst: The analysis of concentration was carried out with different burst timing and it was observed that the maximum concentration at the outlet as the time of burst increases and also affects the average residence time of the injected species. a small change in the turbulent kinematic viscosity can bring a considerable change in the turbulent energy dissipation and in the diffusion of species.Turbulent viscosity The turbulent kinematic viscosity plays important role in the flow. The graph obtained for varies burst time is shown below. the velocity collapses in the smaller length scales. The line averaged concentration at the outlet is computed by . The surface plot for turbulent kinematic viscosity is shown in above figure. Because.

happens in a rapid way and becomes more complex to predict specifically at the corners. In 3D. The plot obtained by solving a 3D model is shown below. It is computed by the using. ] The average surface concentration at the outlet is shown in the above graph. i. The notable change in the 3D model is Increase in residence time Increased mixing Increase in size and number of dead zones. where the three walls intersect. the rate of change in turbulent energy dissipation. [Doubt: Is there any chance of formation of non-coplanar concurrent eddies eddies in 3D model? Because the eddy b/t 3rd and 4th baffle resemble like that. D=0. The graph shows that the maximum concentration at the outlet is decreased and the residence time also shown a considerable change when comparing to 2D.8 m is added to existing 2D model.[I cannot understand the behavior as maximum concentration values fluctuates with increase burst time. The parameters such as inlet velocity Uin.e it does not showed constant drop or rise. . U guys also observed the same?] Comparison of 2D with a 3D model: For 3D analysis. This demands extremely refined mesh for the wall function. memory and cost. The 3D model gives a relatively accurate result than a 2D model at a price of increased computational time. the modification done is nothing but a depth. It seems that the most possible region for dead zones to take place is the front and back depth. baffle layout and Dh/W ratio brings up a noticeable change in size of dead zone.

[I am not clear with this queation] Line Average Concentration = \frac{ \int C * U_o_u_t dy}{\int U_o_u_t dy} \frac{\partial c}{\partial t} + {u}' \frac{\partial c}{\partial x}= \nu_t \frac{\partial^2 c}{\partial x^2} .Redesigning of reactor for improved efficiency: My opinion on this is. the efficiency might get increase when we decrease the distance between the baffles and also by increasing the length of the baffle.

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot useful- My Observation
- 1-s2.0-S111001681630028X-main
- Adv Turb v62 01 Overview
- Handout Turbulence
- day2
- chap8
- An Introduction to Turbulence Models
- An Introduction to Turbulesdfnce Chalmers Lars Davidson
- Turbulance Model Chalmers
- Models
- dam_Lecture2
- 118
- fluent _D
- LectureNotes-TurbulenceModeling
- Turbulence Nutshell Slides
- Compound Wall Treatment for RANS Computation of Complex Turbulent Flows and Heat Transfer
- [O_M_Belotserkovskii,_A_M_Oparin,_V_M_Chechetkin]_(Bokos-Z1).pdf
- Turbulence 2
- Turbulent Phenomenon
- Cds 13 Instruct 2
- Turbulence Model for Recirculating
- NUMERCAL
- AAABDA
- Ency Turb
- Turbulence Primer
- Fluent.5.Turbulence Imp
- cfd notes
- TURBULENCE MODEL ANALYSIS OF FLOW INSIDE A HYDROCYCLONE
- out3
- 6819900 Turbulent Flows Case Studies FLUENT
- My Observation Ragu

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd