0 Up votes0 Down votes

15 views13 pagesJan 23, 2013

© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

15 views

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future
- The Day the World Came to Town: 9/11 in Gander, Newfoundland
- Seveneves: A Novel
- Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't
- Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race
- Hidden Figures Young Readers' Edition
- Hidden Figures Young Readers' Edition
- The Right Stuff
- The Path Between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal, 1870-1914
- The Wright Brothers
- The Wright Brothers
- The Last Second
- Life in a Medieval Castle
- Fault Lines
- State of Fear
- State of Fear
- Elevator Pitch: A Novel
- The Power of Discipline: 7 Ways it Can Change Your Life
- The Great Bridge: The Epic Story of the Building of the Brooklyn Bridge

You are on page 1of 13

Pipe#3

Covered in this lecture: 1. 2. 3. 4. Minor losses Equivalent Lengths Noncircular pipes Multiple pipe systems - series

Minor Losses S Losses due to entrances, expansions, bends, valves, fittings, etc. S

can be significant

S Caused by turbulence, flow separation S Denoted by h m or h lm = K V 2g where K (or Ke, Kc, Kb, KE, etc.) is determined experimentally for each fitting. Sudden Expansion V2 he = K 1 = 1 2g

2

D1 2 (D ) 2

V2 1 2g

in which D K = 1 - ( 1) 2 D2

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

Sudden Contraction S The process of converting pressure to velocity (shown 1 to 0) is very efficient, the vena contracta is point 0 S The process of converting velocity back to pressure to is not as efficient (shown 0 to 2) 1 V1 0 2 V2

S Head loss is expressed in terms of V2 V2 hc = Kc 2 2g S Values are available in Tables S Entrance loss Ke from reservoir varies (0.78 reentrant, 0.5 for square- edged, to 0.04 for well rounded) S Exit loss to a reservoir is always KE = 1.0

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

Equivalent Length The head loss through a component is expressed in terms of a length of pipe Le needed for the same head loss, so Le V2 hm = f D 2g Now if K = S? is in the section, and we know f and D, we can write L e = KD f Example: If all the minor loss add up to K = 20 in 5000 ft of line of 12 inch diameter line, and if f = 0.020, the equivalent length of the minor losses 20 (12 in 1 ft/12 in ) = 1000 ft L e = KD = 0.02 f So 5000 ft + 1000 ft = 6000 ft of pipe without the minor losses would have the same amount of head loss as the pipe section with the minor losses. Noncircular Pipes The D used in our equations is actually the hydraulic diameter, D h = 4A P where A is the area of the flow, and P is the wetted perimeter of the pipe section. For a circular pipe

D 4A = 4p 4 = D Dh = P 2p D/2

2

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

Example: What are the Reynolds number, relative roughness, and head loss for 1000 ft for a 8 in by 1 ft rectangular cast iron pipe (e = 0.00085 ft carrying water (? = 1 x 10- 5 ft2/s) at 9 ft/s?

4(8/12 ft) 1 ft = 0.80 ft D h = 4A = P 2 (8/12 ft) + 2(1 ft) Using Dh as D VD = (9 ft/s)(0.80 ft) = 720, 000 Re = ? 1 10 - 5 ft 2/s Also use Dh for D in the calculation of relative roughness = 0.00085 ft = 0.001063 D 0.80 ft From Moody, f = 0.022, so 2 hf = f L V D 2g 1000 ft (9 ft/s) 2 h f = 0.022 = 34.6 ft 0.80 ft 2 32.2 ft/s 2

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

Example: If steel pipe with D=15 cm, Find i) the discharge through the pipe in the flowing figure for H = 10 m , and ii) determine the head loss H for Q = 60 l/s.

1

H=? Water at 20 deg C Square- edged entrance 12 m Standard Elbows Globe Valve

Q=?

30 m

60 m

Part i) Writing the energy equation between points 1 and 2, using 2 as the datum (z = 0) and including all losses

H+0+0 =

velocity head at 1 pressure head at 1 V 2 2 pressure head at 2

2g

+0+0+

elevation head at 2

2 1 V2

2 2g

+f

entrance loss

0.15 m 2g

friction loss

L = 30 + 12 + 60 m 102 m V 2 2

+ 2 0.9

V2 2 2g

+ 10

V2 2 2g

+ 1.0

V2 2 2g

elbow loss

valve loss

exit loss

5

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

So for ? = 1.01 m2/s, e/D = 0.0017, then Moody gives (2.63 m/s )(0.15m) = 391, 000 Re = 1.01 m 2/s For which f = 0.023. Repeating the procedure gives V2 = 2.60 m/s, Re = 380,000 and f = 0.023. The discharge is Q = V 2A 2 = (2.60 m/s)(p )(0.15 m) 2 = 0.0459 m 3/s = 45.9 l/s 4 Part ii) Q is known, solution is straightforward 0.06 m 3/s Q V2 = = = 3.40 m/s Re = 505, 000 f = 0.023 A (p /4)(0.15 m) 2 and V2 H = 2 (13.3 + 680 f ) 2g (3.4 m/s) 2 H= (13.3 + 680 0.023 ) = 17.06 m 2 9.8 m/s 2 Using equivalent lengths Using the technique of equivalent lengths, the value of f is approximated, say f = 0.022. The sum of minor losses is 13.3, and the kinetic energy at point 2 is considered a minor loss, so L e = KD = 13.3 0.15 = 90.7 m f 0.022 So the total pipe length is 30 m + 12 m + 60 m +90.7 m = 192.7 m. Solving for Part i) of the problem 2 192.7 m (V 2 m/s) 2 L + Le V2 10 m = f =f D 2g 0.15 m 2g m/s 2 If f = 0.022, V2 = 2.63 m/s, Re = 391,000, so from Moody new f = 0.023.

6

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

If f = 0.023, V2 = 2.58, so Q = 45.6 l/s. S Normally it is not necessary to use the new f to improve Le, unless your first guess if f is very poor.

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

Multiple pipe systems When fluid flows from one pipe to another of a different diameter, it is considered as connected in series. A

H 2 1 Ke

Not to scale

In general two type of problems S H is desired for a Q, or S Q is desired for a given H Writing the energy equation from A to B including all minor losses

pressure head at A pressure head at B

H+ 0 + 0 =

velocity head at A

elevation head at B

+0

velocity head at B

V2 + Ke 1 2g

entrance loss

L1 V2 1 + f1 + D 1 2g

friction loss Pipe 1

V2 + K Exp 1 2g

Sudden Expansion

L2 V2 2 f2 D 2 2g

friction loss Pipe 2

V2 + K Exit 2 2g

Expansion

loss Pipe 1- 2

8

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

Using the continuity equation V1D1 = V2D2 to eliminate V2 from the above equation, along with our diameter calculation for Kexp = [1 - (D1/D2) 2 ]2 and setting Kexit = 1, we get V2 f L D f L D D H = 1 K e + 1 1 + [1 - ( 1) 2] 2 + 2 2 ( 1) 4 + ( 1) 4 D1 D2 D2 D2 D2 2g

For pipes of known lengths and sizes, we can reduce this to V2 H = 1 (C 1 + C 2 f 1 + C 3 f 2) 2g Where C1, C2, C3 are known. S With Q given, Re is computed and f read from Moody S With H given, V1, f1, f2 are unknown. Assume values, solve for V, compute estimate of Re, solve for f s, etc. Example: Suppose for our Figure, Ke = 0.5 L1 = 1000 ft D1 = 2 ft e1 = 0.005 ft L2 = 800 ft D2 = 3 ft e2 = 0.001 ft ? = 0.00001 ft2/s, H = 20 ft We get V2 H = 1 0.5 + f 1(1000) + (1 - (2) 2) 2 + f 2(800)(2) 4 + (2) 4 2g 2 3 3 3 3

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

S Now for e1/D1 = 0.0025, and e2/D2 = 0.00033, From the Flat part (complete turbulent) of Moody .f1 = 0.025 f2 = 0.015

Solving for V1, V1 = 9.49 ft/s, and so V2 = 4.21 ft/s, for which 9.49 ft/s 2 ft Re 1 = = 1, 898, 000 0.00001 ft 4.21 ft/s 3 ft Re 2 = = 1, 263, 000 0.00001 ft S With these values, from Moody .f1 = 0.025 So, V1 = 9.46 ft/s, so f2 = 0.016

Q = 9.46 ft/s p (2 ft) 2 = 29.8 cfs 4 Using Equivalent Pipes S Equivalent lengths can be used since two pipe systems are said to be equivalent when the same head loss produces the same discharge in both systems

Writing the head loss for the first pipe Q2 L1 f 1L 1 8Q 2 1 1 hf 1 = f1 = D 1 (D 2p /4) 22g D 5 p 2g 1 1

10

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

Writing the head loss for the second pipe f 2L 2 8Q 2 2 hf 2 = D 5 p 2g 2 S For equvilent pipe, flow is equal, an the head loss is the same then: For the two to be equivalent pipes hf 1 = hf 2 Q1 = Q2

Setting hf1 = hf2, and simplifying f 2L 2 f 1L 1 = 5 D2 D5 1 Solving for L2 gives f D L 2 = L 1 1 ( 2) 5 f 2 D1 S This is the length of a second pipe to be equivalent to that of the first pipe Example: Replace 300 m of 25 cm pipe with an equivalent length of 15 cm pipe S Approximate values of f1 and f2, assuming complete turbulence If for this example f1 = 0.020 and f2 = 0.018, then 15 cm 5 L 2 = 300 m 0.020 = 25.9 m 0.018 25 cm S For the assumed conditions, 25.9 m of 15 cm pipe has the same head loss as 300 m of 25 cm pipe.

11

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

Example: Solve the previous reservoir example using equivalent pipes S First express minor losses in terms of equivalent lengths, using f1 and f2 as fully turbulent For pipe 1

entrance expansion (2/3) 2] 2

= 0.809

1000 ft + 65 ft = 1065 ft of 2 ft diam. pipe 800 ft + 200 ft = 1000 ft of 3 ft diam. pipe Expressing the 3 ft diam. pipe in terms of 2 ft diam. pipe f D L e = L 2 = L 1 1 ( 2) 5 f2 D1 0.015 2 ft 5 = 79 ft Le = 1000 ft 0.025 3 ft By adding this to the 2 ft pipe, the problem is now equivalent to 1065 ft + 79 ft = 1144 ft of 2 ft diam. pipe So if e = 0.05 ft, and H = 20 ft, With f = 0.025, V = 9.5 ft/s, Re = 1,900,000. Converges, so Q =9.5p = 29.9 ft3/s

12

( )

Pipeflow

Pipe#3

H=f

1144 ft V 2 2 ft 2g

13

- foundation design sampleUploaded byArun Kumar
- energy equation.pdfUploaded bysatya
- Flow in Pipes CompleteUploaded bySYaz WAni
- Pressure Loss From Fittings – 2K Method – NeutriumUploaded byGindiMan
- Flownet SeepageUploaded byJohn William Horasia
- Hydraulic Ram PumpUploaded byDHVSU
- Air Lift PumpUploaded byChukwuebuka Anene
- Open Channel Laboratory ExperimentUploaded byJohn Ceasar Pasco
- Wanda 4 Liquid (en)Uploaded byMamoon Riaz
- D 5610Uploaded byshegarpositron
- Fluid Mechanics 1Uploaded bySasiKumar
- exp1Uploaded byAnusha Anu
- Engg Services Civil Engineering Subjective Paper 2 2011Uploaded bySudharsananPRS
- Hydraulic Ram SlideshowUploaded bysaharui
- R Cooke Paste07Uploaded bycjbalderrama
- Fitting Quantity - QTYUploaded byjeffy
- venturi meter.docxUploaded byFatimah Badruddin
- 115325841 Design of Syphon AqueductUploaded byGuru Murthy
- Capacity of Vertical Drainage StackUploaded byMiroslav Aleksic
- Aspecte hidrauliceUploaded byFlorentina Sudu
- NotesLab2Uploaded byJohn Paul Cristobal
- Bomba de Pozo Upa 200bUploaded byHernan Rodrigo Castro
- Hydro Power Plants (1)Uploaded byZelalem Girma
- NPSHUploaded byrex tanong
- 02 - Radial Flow and Radius of InvestigationUploaded byroger
- Manual SWI2Uploaded byramondiazn
- Conduit Dynamics in Herand Power Plant NTNU ThesisUploaded byRodrigo Saraiva
- Chapter5_prob01Uploaded bylucas
- outcome3t2Uploaded byJohn Paulo Buzon
- Excess Flow ValveUploaded byKarenMahollyUrzagasteCondori

- Basics of Reverse OsmosisUploaded byNagarjuna Tadiparti
- InTech-Mass Transfer Phenomena and Biological MembranesUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- 8 Carbohydrate MetabolismUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- envdao98-50Uploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- Total Boiler SystemUploaded byAbdus Saboor Khalid
- Coal Moisture Analysis 2016Uploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- Adsorption by medina.pdfUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- ChemUploaded byLucianaAcosta
- Chapter 5 Clarification.docxUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- engg.500 notes.docxUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- BiochemistryUploaded byranjish_007
- Laboratory Tags (Jan. 28 2015)Uploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- Course outlineUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- Assignment Kay SalazarUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- ThermoUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- BPOCchapter2Uploaded byJosiah Johnson
- IPC Part 5Uploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- envdao98-49Uploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- Chemical NomenclatureUploaded bymail2quraishi3084
- General Principle of Professional ConductUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- Assignment for Plant Design and EconomicsUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- ethicsreport 2Uploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- Evaluation Sheet for on-Thejob TraineesUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- Carton MakingUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- heat exchangersUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro
- manometersUploaded byDionie Wilson Diestro

- Patel PresentationUploaded byAnonymous wt2BA7u
- dk1203_fmUploaded byahiguera
- Thermal Boundary Layer SolutionUploaded bymsnaghavi
- The Cibse NotesUploaded byMuniswamaiah Mohan
- Hydro CyclonesUploaded byBambang Hadinugroho
- Ran 2005 Preliminary Design of a 2D Supersonic Inlet to Maximize Total PressureUploaded byEben Joachim
- Unit 1 Variable Head Type FlowmetersUploaded byShivam Vishvakarma
- Fluid Flow Lecture Notes -9Uploaded byIsrael Lives
- Wax DepositionUploaded byArjit Kumar
- PERCOBAAN Filtrasi GranularUploaded byKevin Esmunaldo
- Chapter4 Flow Performance of Wellhead and Surface Gathering SystemsUploaded byสิทธิไชย อรุณวํฒนชัย
- Cve 240-Assignment 1_chapter 2Uploaded byEhab Wilson
- Fundamentals of Aerodynamics Chapter_5Uploaded byRamanujam Sankar
- Evaluation and Verification of CFD-Simulation Using OpenFOAM for Wind TurbinesUploaded byYogesh Hanwate
- CraneNuclear-A4-Apr2013-Section8.pdfUploaded byArianna Rios Da Cunhâ
- Design and Analytical Calculation for a Hydram using Individual Head LossesUploaded byIJSTE
- UT Dallas Syllabus for mech6310.501.10f taught by ()Uploaded byUT Dallas Provost's Technology Group
- Mentzos M Etal_2004_A Numerical Simulation of the Impeller-Volute Interaction in a Centrifugal PumpUploaded byAndronikos Filios
- measurementUploaded bymts1234
- Doze Alfabet Totaliz 3Uploaded byVadim Lazari
- Two Phase FlowUploaded bysindalvaleri
- Weisman.pdfUploaded byFrancisco Opps
- WettAbilityUploaded bysawan
- Introduction to Compressible Fluid Flows (Part II)Uploaded byLieu Dinh Phung
- Temperature Dependence of Density and Dynamic Surface Tension of Groundnut Oil and Palm OilUploaded bytheijes
- Fluid Mechanics Question BankUploaded byMazher sheikh
- Pascal WS (1)Uploaded byMochamad Yoga Windu Dharmawan
- 10.pdfUploaded byMayank Patel
- IES Civil Engineering Paper II 2013Uploaded byHarshal Bhoite
- GetTRDocUploaded bykrishnamoorthy_krish

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.