You are on page 1of 5

# Page 1 of 5

Notes on the Golden Ratio & the Golden Rectangle
What is the golden ratio?
Imagine that we have cut a whole line randomly into a bigger and smaller piece.

We could express the ratio of the whole line to the bigger piece as a fraction:
wbolc
biggcr

And we could express the ratio of the bigger piece to the smaller piece as a fraction as well:
biggcr
smollcr

We could do this wherever we randomly cut the line. However, there is one special place where we
could cut the line that would create a unique situation:
wbolc
biggcr
=
biggcr
smollcr

When this special relationship happens—when the ratio of the whole to the bigger piece is equal to the
ratio of the bigger piece to the smaller piece—we call this ratio the golden ratio. Now, instead of using
words like "whole" and "bigger," let's express this as an algebraic equation with variables. Let's call the
whole "a," the bigger part "b," and the remaining smaller part "a‐b". So then, we have a golden ratio
when:
o
b
=
b
o - b

smaller bigger
whole
Page 2 of 5

What is the golden rectangle?
Let's take our a and b above, which are in the golden ratio, and construct a rectangle contained by them.

This is a golden rectangle. It has often been said that the golden rectangle was deliberately used in a lot
of our art from the Greeks on. (It is also debatable how much that is true.) Now let's look at an
interesting property of golden rectangles. Let's construct a square and a rectangle inside this rectangle:

Notice that the resulting rectangle has sides b and a‐b. But remember that we started with a golden
rectangle, which means that this relationship is true:
o
b
=
b
o - b

So the ratio of the sides of the new, smaller rectangle is the same ratio as the bigger ratio; in other
words, both rectangles are golden rectangles. This is always true; whenever you mark off a square on a
golden rectangle, the leftover rectangle is a new golden rectangle.

b
a
b
a-b b
b
a
Page 3 of 5

Let's imagine now that we mark off a square on the new rectangle:

Notice that we have a new golden rectangle in the top right. We can mark off a square in that, and on
and on…

If we put quarter‐circle arcs into the squares, we would have a sort of spiral:

Calculating the golden ratio
(This is some real math stuff; I want you to read it, but only some of you will remember this kind of
algebra, and I will not ask you to repeat it.) Consider the number we get when we take a circle and
b
a-b b
b
a
b
a-b b
b
a
b
a-b b
b
a
Page 4 of 5

calculate the fraction
cì¡cum]c¡cncc
dìumctc¡
. We call that number π, and when we calculate the number we find
it is approximately 3.1415… As it happens, π is an irrational number, and so we cannot write it out
exactly as a decimal. (How do we calculate π? Well, in the spring we will see how Archimedes did it.)
So what about the golden ratio?
o
b
=
b
o - b

In this situation, we also call the number we get when we calculate
u
b
by a Greek letter; we call it φ (phi).
How do we calculate the number? Well, we could make it easy on ourselves if we choose to make b in
that equation the number 1:
o
1
=
1
o -1

Since
u
1
= φ (the golden ratio) and
u
1
= o, if we solve for a, we will have found φ, the number that results
from the golden ratio. So that we remember that clearly, let’s not call the variable a; let’s call it φ.
φ
1
=
1
φ -1

So how do we solve the equation
φ
1
=
1
φ-1
? First of all we cross multiply:
φ(φ - 1) = 1
φ
2
-φ = 1
Uh‐oh, we have a squared term. That means we will need to use the quadratic formula to solve it. You
If ox
2
+ bx + c = u then x =
-b _√b
2
- 4oc
2o

So we need to take our equation and put it into the right form by subtracting 1 from each side:
φ
2
-φ -1 = u
Hmmm… What are a, b, and c? Well, since any number is equal to 1 times itself, therefore:
φ
2
= 1φ
2
, so o = 1,
-φ = -1φ, so b = -1,
c = -1
Putting that into the quadratic formula gives us:
Page 5 of 5

φ =
-(-1) _¸(-1)
2
-4(1)(-1)
2(1)

φ =
1 _ ¸1 - (-4)
2

φ =
1 _ √S
2

Because of the ±, this would give us two solutions. But one of the solutions is negative, which is
irrelevant to us, so we will only calculate with the +. On my calculator that comes out to 1.61803.