You are on page 1of 5

SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS FEU-Lasalle JD-MBA Program Course Outline Third Termn SY 2012-2013 Atty, Ronald C' Chua

PRELIMINARIEq
Define Action Define Special Proceeding

Action v. Special Proceeding capps: 1) Hagans v. Wislezenus, 42Pnil 880 (1920) 2) Natcher v. Court of Appeals, 366 SCRA 386 (2001) 3) Vda. De Manalo v. Court of Appeals, 349 SCRA 135 QAAI) 366 SCRA 752 (2001)

JURISDICTION
Extent of Jurisdiction

BP 129, as amended

Cages: 1) Mangaliman v, Gonzales, 36 SCRA 462 (1970) 2) Baybayan v. Aquino, 149 SCRA 185 (1987) 3) Fernandez v. Maravilla, 10 SCRA 589 (1964) 4) Manalo v. Paredes,4T Pnil 938 (1925)

RULE ?2 - SUB,JECJ MATTFR AIIID APPLIQABILLTY oF QENFBAL BULE$


Relate to other provisions of the ROC Casq:

1) Fernandezv. Maravilla, supra


RULE 7? - YENUEJTIID

Bp,cEss

Steps to determine which court has jurisdiction When doee the court acquire jurisdiction? Settlement of estate upon dissolution of maniage Presumption of Death - Article 390 to 392 of the CC

Cases:

1) Salazarv. CFlof Laguna, &1 Phil78 (1937) 2) Cayetano v. Leonidas, 129 SCRA 522 (1984\ 3) In re l(aw Singco, 74Pnil 239 (1943) 4) Garcia Fule v. Court of Appeals, 74 SCRA 189 (1976) 5) Cuenoo v. Court of Appeals, 53 SCRA 360 (1973) 6) Ongsingco v, Tan, 97 Phil 330 (1955) 7) Eusebio v. Eusebio, 100 Phil593 (1956) 8) Sandovalv. Santiago, 83 Pnil78r (1949) 9) Vda. De Manzanero v. CFI of Batangas, 61 Phil 850 (1935)
1O)Benedicto v. Javellana, 10 Phil 197 (1908) 11)Casiano v. Maloto, 70 SCRA 232 (1977) 12)Cuizon v. Ramolete,129 SCRA 495 (1984) 13)Bemardo v. Court of Appeals, 7 SCRA 367 (1963) 14)Uriarte v. CFI of Negros Occidental, 33 SCRA 252 (1970) l5)PCIB v. Esalin,56 SCRA 266 (1974) 16)Del Rosario v. Del Rosario, 67 Phil652 (1939) 17)Dolar v. Roman Catholic, 68 Phil727 (1939) 18)Alfonso v. Natividad, 6 Phil240 (1906) 19)Cruz v. De Jesus, 52 Phil 870 (1929) 20)De la Rama v. De la Rama, 7 Phil 745 (9A7) 21)Villacorte v. Mariano, 89 Phil342 (1951) 22)Calma v. Tanedo,66 Phil 594 (1938) 23)Ocampo v. Potenciano 89 Phil 160 (1951) 24)Prado v. Natividad,4T Phil776 (1925) 25)De la Rama v. De la Rama, 25 Phil 437 (19131 26)Fulgencio v. Gatchalian,2l Pnil252 (1912) 27)Lukban v. Republic, 98 Phil 574 (1956)

RULE 74 - SUL4MARY SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES


Different modes of intestate settlement Requisites of a valid extrajudicial settlement Nature of summary settlement Requisites for a valid summary settlement of an estate of small value

Extrajudicial Settlement v. Summary Settlement


Cases: 1) Utulo v. Vda. De Garcia, 66 Phil302 (1938) 2) Hernandez v. Andal, 78 Phil 196 (19471 3) Tonesv. Tones, 10 SCRA 185 (1964) 4) Areillas v. Montejo,26 SCRA 197 (1968) 5) Ermac v. Medelo, 64 SCRA 359 (1975)

6) Caneon v. Agcaoili, 1 SCRA 521 (1961) 7) McMicking v. $y Conbieng, 21 Phil 211 (1912) 8) Pereira v. Court of Appeals, 174 SCRA 154 (1939) 9) Jerez v. Nietes, 30 SCRA 905 (1969)

- PBgPgg,r|pN qF WLI-. ALLOWAFIGE 9F wlft nulE.,,g - *uLsmilsr Qn pmeulgwange pr wlur#


RULE 7fi

NEpFS$ARY

Nature of probate of a will Effect of allowanee or disallowance of a will Jurisdictional requirements for probate of a will Scope of inquiry on proceeding to probate will Proof required on probate hearing Binding force of trial court order allowing or disallowing a will When jurisdiction vest Cases: 1) Femandez v. Dimagiba, 21 SCRA 428 (1967) 2) Mercado v. Santos, 66 SCRA215 (1938) 3) Sumilang v. Ramagosa,2l SCRA 1369 (1967) 4) Balanay v. Martinez, 64 SCRA 452 (19751 5) PastorJr. v. Court of Appeals, 122 SCRA 885 (1983) 6) US v. Chiu Guimco,30 Phil 917 (1917) 7) Rodriguez v. Borja, 17 SCRA 418 (1966) 8) Teotico v. DelVal, 13 SCRA 406 (1965) 9) Femando v. Crisostomo, 90 SCRA 585 (1951) 10)Araujo v. Celis, 6 Phil459 (1906) 11)Lim Billian v. Suntay, 63 Phil 793 (1936) 12)Basa v. Mercado, 61 Phil632 (1935) 13)DeAranzv. Galing, 161 $CRA628 (1988) 14)ln rra EEtate of Johnson, 39 Phil 156 (1918) 15)Abut v. Abut, 45 SCRA 326 (1972t 16)Rodelas v. Aranza, 119 SCRA 16 (1982) 17)Gan v. YaP, 104 PhilsOg (1958) 18)Gago v. fMamuyac, 49 Phil 902 (1927) 19)Aldanase v. $alutillo,47 Phil 548 (1925) 20)Cabang v. Delfinado, 34 Phil 291 (1916) 21)Avara v. Garcia, 42Phil 145 (1921) 22)$olivio v. Court of Appeals, 182 SCRA 1 1 I (1990) 23)Manalo v. Paredes, suPra 24)Riera v. Palmaroli, 40 Phil 105 (1919) 25)Manahan v. Manahan, 58 Phil448 (1933)

Article 815 to 817 of the CC Requisites of probate of a will allowed in a foreign state
Caqeq; 1) $untay v. Suntay, 95 Phil 500 (1954) 2) Fluemer v. Hix, 54 Phil 610 (1930) 3) Miciano v. Brimo, 50 Phil 867 (1924) +i teon & Ghezzi v" Manufacturers Life lnsurance Co.,90 Phil459 (1951)

BU!-E 7s

RUIF $5 Ar{p RU!"EJ}?

Who may serye ae executors and administrators Executor v. Administrator Other ground for disqualification or incompetency When are letters of administration granted Kinds of administrators lnterest required to oppose issuance of letters testamentary Special Adminishator Bond of executor and administrator lnventory and APPraisal Powers and duties of executor and administrator Accountabitity and compensation of executor and administrator Action by and against executor and administrator
CaFeq:

13 Phil 212 (1909) 2) Navasv. Garcia,44Pnt711 (1923) 3) Mereado v. Vda. De Jaen, 64 Phil 75 (1937) 4) Qzaetav. Pecson and BPl, 93 Phit416 (1953) 5) De Guzman v. Limeolioc, 68 Phil673 (1939) 6) Gonzales v. Aguinaldo, 190 SCRA 112 (1990) 7) Johannes v. Haryey,43 Phil 175 (1922) 8) Gutierrez de Ocampo v. Valera Calderon, 59 Phil631 9) Trillana v. Crisostomo, 89 Phil710 10)Gutierrez v. Villegas, 5 SCRA 313 (1962) 11)Duran v. Duran, 20 SCRA 379 12)De Guzman v. Angeles, 162 SCRA347 (1988) 13)Garcia Fule v. Court of Appeals, supra 14)Roxasv. Pecson, 82 Phil 407 (1948) 1S)Pijuan v. Vda. De Gunea, 18 SCRA 898 (1966) 16)Tan v. Go Chiong Lee, 46 Phil200 (1924) 17)Ltzzarga Hermanos v. Abada, 4A Pnil 124 18)Wamer Bames v. Luzon Surety, 95 Phil 924 (1954)

1) Guenero v. Teran,

19)Wlson v. Rear, 55 Phil44 20)Luzon $urety v. Quebral,127 SCRA 295 (1984) 21)Cosme de Mendoza v. Pacheco,64 Phil 134 (1937) 22)Gustilo v. $ian, 53 Phil 155 (1929) Z3)Degala v, Oeniza and Umipig, 78 Phil 791 24)Chua Tan v Del Rosario, 57 Phil 411 (19321 25)Adapon v. Maralit, 69 Phil 383 (1940) 26)Moore & Sons Mercantile Co. v. Wagner, 50 Phil 128 {1927), 27)$antero v. CFI of Cavite, 153 SCRA 728 28)Concepcion Jocson de Hilado v. Nava, 69 Phil 1 (1939) 29)$an Diego v. Nombre, 11 SCRA 165 (1964) 30)Jaroda v. Cusi Jr", 28 SCRA 1008 (1969) 31)Garcia v. Escudero, 43 Phil 437 32)Nicolas v Nicolas,6S Phil 332 (1936) 33)Uy Tioco v. lmperial, 53 Phil 802 t1928) 34)Dacanay v. gemandez, 53 Phil 824 (1928) 35)Lacsonv. Reyes, 182 SCRA 729 (1990) 36)Rosenstock v. Elser, 48 Phil 708 (1925) 37)Joson v. Joson, 2 SCRA 83 38)Philippine Trust Co. v. Luzon Surety, 2 SCRA 122 (1951) 39)Dela Cruz v. Camon, 16 SCRA 886 (1966) 40)Quirino v, Gorospe, 169 SCRATOZ (1989) 41)Aguas v. Lllemos, 5 SCRA 959 (1962) 42)Melgar v Buenviaje,179 SCRA 196 (1989) 43)Pajarillo v. lAC, 176 SCRA 340 44)Bernado v. CA,7 SCRA 367 (1963) 45)Guanco v. National Bank, 54 Phil 244 $WA) 46)Alafriz v Mina, 28 Phil 137 (1914) 47)Heirs of Gregoire v. Baker, 51 Phil 75 {1927\ 48)Velasquez v. George, 125 SCRA 456 (1983)