Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NOVEMBER 2012
Contents
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................1 The project team...........................................................................................................................1 SITE DESCRIPTION...............................................................................................................................2 Site and its surroundings ..............................................................................................................2 Site landform, watercourses, geology and soil ................................................................................2 Site cultural and archaeological heritage......................................................................................3 Existing noise and air quality ........................................................................................................3 CONSULTATION....................................................................................................................................6 Background to the development...................................................................................................6 Public consultation on the scheme ...............................................................................................6 NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT .........................................................................................................7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................................8 Project alternatives .......................................................................................................................8 APPROACH TO THE EIA ....................................................................................................................10 EIA ISSUES AND FINDINGS ...............................................................................................................12 Construction and environmental management...........................................................................12 Soils and geology .......................................................................................................................14 Hydrology and flood risk .............................................................................................................14 Archaeology................................................................................................................................14 Ecology..15 Landscape and visual aspects ...................................................................................................15 Air quality ..16 Noise and vibration .....................................................................................................................16 Socio-economics ........................................................................................................................17 Traffic.17 Sustainability...............................................................................................................................19 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? ....................................................................................................................21 CONTACT DETAILS ............................................................................................................................21
INTRODUCTION
This document is the non-technical summary (NTS) of the environmental statement (ES) for the Pennyfeathers Development, near Ryde on the Isle of Wight. It describes in non-technical language the proposed development and the potential impacts it may have on the physical and biological environment and on people. It also lists the measures that the developer will implement to avoid or reduce adverse impacts and to enhance potential social benefits, and describes how environmental issues will be managed during and after construction. The ES presents the complete findings of the environmental impact assessment (EIA), and is one of the documents accompanying the outline planning application submitted under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The primary purpose of the ES is to inform the planning and decision making process by reporting the results of the EIA, and in particular any significant environmental effects. The authority determining the application is the Isle of Wight (IoW) Council. They have confirmed that the development requires an ES to be submitted alongside the planning application. If you have any questions or would like to comment on the application then you can find out how to do so at the end of this NTS.
RSK was responsible for undertaking and managing the EIA studies, using their inhouse resources supplemented by the following specialist consultants: Glanville Consultants Ltd for the transport assessment Frankham Consultancy Group Ltd for all engineering and design issues associated with access and modifications to the railway, stations/platforms.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Site and its surroundings
Located on the southern edge of Ryde, Isle of Wight (Figure 1), the Pennyfeathers site comprises mainly fields in agricultural use (currently used for pasture/grazing or hay/silage) classified as mostly (~70%) grade 3b (moderate quality) agricultural land. The site also comprises hedgerows, woodlands, a permanent stream (Monktonmead Brook) and some ephemeral spring-fed streams. Also included in the site is a farm and associated agricultural buildings (Prestwood Grange), a pound store open to the public and a garage with car showroom. The cemetery and an adjacent existing electricity substation compound are not included within the scheme. For the purpose of the planning application, the site area is shown to include parts of Smallbrook Lane/Great Preston Road/Brading Road and the Westridge Cross junction (see Figure 2). This is to accommodate planned highways works (realignments and junction improvements) proposed to be implemented under the Pennyfeathers scheme as components to support the development. Similarly, the site area also spans across the existing Island Line Railway and steam railway at Smallbrook junction. This is to accommodate connection of a cyclepath and footbridge from the Pennyfeathers development, ultimately connecting to both of the railway stations, and further on towards the Smallbrook stadium. The southern extension of the site area down to Harding Shute merges into the western edge of Whitefield Wood and in this portion is mostly plantation woodland. A footpath and cycle track will be formed in this area together with habitat enhancements including native tree planting. Land uses adjoining the site include some commercial areas along Brading Road to the east and residential areas of Ryde to the north. Land to the west is mostly agricultural holdings whereas the southern boundary comprises small woodlands.
Top of site adjacent to Brading road (behind hedge on left of picture) looking south toward Busy Bee Garden Centre
There is a shallow aquifer in the River Terrace Deposits across the eastern flank of site, which seems to feed the local line of springs. There is a deeper confined but unproductive aquifer in the deeper Bembridge Limestone that lies underneath the negligibly permeable Bembridge Marls.
CONSULTATION
Background to the development
Parts of the site have been the subject of several previous smaller planning applications in relation to existing land uses. However, the consolidation of land holdings has allowed the formulation of a larger vision for the area. Conceptual plans were developed and two community consultation events were held in 2006 and 2007 to generate local interest and create input to the development process. A preliminary master plan was formulated in 2008 and this was subject to an environmental appraisal (September 2008) to identify important constraints and opportunities of the site for optimising the project design. A further public exhibition was held in 2009. The current scheme is of smaller scale than that promoted in 2008 (it no longer includes development to the north of Smallbrook Lane) and the scheme has been significantly modified to account for increased knowledge of the site, greater understanding of the extent of public interest and aspirations, and the evolving national/regional planning framework. with representatives of the developers team and the EIA team, and there was a large amount of informed and informative feedback received, which has been taken into account in further scheme development and the impact assessment process.
A request for an EIA screening and scoping opinion was sent to the IoW Council on 7th June 2011 and the accompanying scoping report was circulated to a range of consultees/organisations including Natural England and the Environment Agency. The screening and scoping opinion was received from the IoW Council on 14th July 2011. Copies of the EIA screening and scoping opinion are contained in the ES Volume 2, Annex 5.2 and Annex 5.3, respectively. As a result of this process, it was formally agreed that the EIA would consider environmental impacts of the development (both construction and post-construction) on a range of topics. In addition to the formal EIA process, other correspondence and discussions took place with a range of organisations including local landowners, utilities and transport companies, and local groups.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The area subject to the planning application (the site redline) is shown in Figure 2. This encloses an area of about 53 hectares, although only the central part of the site would be developed for housing. The overall site master plan, illustrated in Figure 3, sets out the main development areas and infrastructure such as roads and paths. The development will comprise mostly housing up to a maximum of three storeys high. The mix of housing types will be as in Table 1. The master plan comprises 121 assisted living units, included in the total of 904 units. The scheme will be a phased development, with construction occurring over several years between 2014 and 2027. proximity to the town centre via sustainable means of travel. Alternative layouts were developed as part of the scheme design and the most favourable alternative, which respects the constraints of the site, has been selected. For instance, internal roads have been aligned so as not bisect valued ecological habit. In addition, some variation in the development mix has been considered although the aim has always been to develop a residential scheme. The objective of the design put forward is to optimise site use whilst minimising environmental impacts. For instance, relatively low-rise structures have been selected that can be accommodated within the landscape setting. Other types of development such as extensive commercial or industrial were ruled out due to various factors such as constraints to development at this location, the abundant commercial areas to the east of Brading Road and the proposed industrial development to the north of Smallbrook Lane. The do-nothing alternative (to leave the site undeveloped) would mean that opportunities to improve sustainable transport and other linkages in the area, and the opportunity to meet increasing housing demand, would be foregone.
Project alternatives
There are limited areas on the Isle of Wight, and in or around Ryde in particular, of such a scale that can offer opportunities for a consolidated village style development, rather than piecemeal ad hoc developments such as are possible on smaller pockets of development land that may from time to time become available. The current location is favoured for its
Figure 4 shows the main stages of the EIA that were followed. Baseline environmental conditions were identified from a range of sources and field surveys as identified in Box 4. The scheme master plan was developed iteratively to allow incorporation of knowledge of site constraints gained from the baseline evaluations and to allow impact avoidance and mitigation measures to be designed-in from the outset as illustrated by the examples in Box 5.
Directive on the Assessment of the Effect of Certain Public and Private Projects on the Environment (85/337/EC), as amended by Directives 97/11/EC, 2003/35/EC and COM/2009/0378 Planning application submitted under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
3 The project falls under Schedule 2, Part 10b, of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 (S.I. No. 1824), as an urban development project of more than 0.5 hectare. 2
10
11
Project data gathering Data to describe the construction and operation of the development, including identification of the project activities, materials to be used, discharges and emissions that are likely to occur. Data gathering Environmental data gathering Collection of available information on the existing environment within a suitable area of search. Identification of environmental sensitivities Identification of receptors and their environmental sensitivity, which could be affected by the proposed development. Consultation with regulatory authorities to discuss aspects associated with the proposed project activities. Scoping Site survey work Surveys of the existing environmental conditions to fill gaps in data, to ensure sufficient and adequate data are available and form a suitable baseline for the determination of impacts. Environmental impact assessment Assessment Detailed assessment of the identified potential impacts associated with project activities. Evaluation of significance Evaluation of significance, including qualitative and where possible quantitative estimation of magnitude and severity of effects. Mitigation measures Identification of measures to be applied to eliminate, minimise or manage the potential significant environmental effects. Presentation of the findings of the EIA in a systematic way, including determining the significance of the residual effect on the environment; schedule of environmental commitments and monitoring requirements.
Management
12
for
the
district
creation of construction platforms and ground re-profiling comprising excavation and temporary storage of excavated material for later fill, in order to maintain a suitable cut & fill balance on site and minimising off-site removal drainage works to provide sustainable drainage systems (SUDS) highway and bridge works for roads, parking, cycle paths and footpaths railway works for upgrading Smallbrook Junction Railway Station of
Construction activities in the absence of mitigation measures and controls have the potential to generate temporary, short term adverse impacts. Examples of such mitigation measures include watering to control dust, and use of noise attenuation plant, which will be under the control of the main contractor. The EIA has recommended a range of measures designed to mitigate and control potential impacts, as summarised in the above sections. Prior to the start of construction, a construction method statement (CMS) will be agreed with the relevant authorities. The CMS will define responsibilities and procedures for the management of the potential impacts on the environment arising during demolition, site preparation, excavation and construction and will include, among other things, specific measures for the control of pollution. It is recommended that the main contractor be required to register the site under the considerate constructors scheme. A site waste management plan will also be prepared and submitted for approval as required by the Site Waste Management Plans Regulations 2008.
foundation works for buildings and other structures superstructure works and internal building fitting out and associated building services works hard and soft landscaping including planting. works
It is anticipated that standard construction working hours would be adopted, subject to agreement with the local authority, for instance Monday to Friday 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Saturday mornings 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. There would be no work on Sundays or Public Holidays and working is not expected to take place at night.
impact interactions that may arise from a combination of separate impacts on one or a small number of receptors due to the same proposed development. Information on possible future developments was gathered through discussions with IoW Council and research of relevant planning documentation. The possibility of cumulative impacts arising has been considered in each of the technical chapters of the ES. It was concluded there would be no risk of cumulative impacts arising.
13
Increased amounts of water will flow over hard, impermeable surfaces of the development, but this will not increase the overall discharge rate from the site because the extra surface water volume will be attenuated on site with the use of sustainable drainage systems (SuDS). These will be designed to cope with rainfall up to the 1 in 100 year storm event (plus an additional 30% allowance for climate change). The assessment concluded that the local watercourses and springs will not be affected in terms of volume and quality. Good working practices to be adopted during the construction phase guidance will provide sufficient mitigation against pollution risk (negligible or at most minor, nonsignificant effects are predicted).
Archaeology
A desk-based assessment and field survey confirmed that the site has a moderate potential for archaeological remains, particularly with respect to the Bronze Age, medieval and post-medieval periods. Ten non-designated heritage assets lie within the boundary of the proposed development. For these heritage assets, four will be preserved in situ, and for the other six, no significant physical effects are predicted. Further geophysical surveys also suggested the presence of some potential archaeological targets of limited importance within the site
Monktonmead Brook will be protected against potential pollution from the development
14
boundary but excavation of trial trenches confirmed there to be no finds of any merit. Two listed buildings (outside the site) could be visually affected by the proposals, but both are considered of low sensitivity to visual impact. It is anticipated that residual impact from the scheme will be negligible.
Best practice measures will be included in a construction method statement and the development will include targeted measures such as translocation of notable plants to safeguarded receptor sites, as well as the creation of diverse new habitats including green space, new ponds, landscaping and wildflower meadows. Various further surveys and monitoring will be undertaken, with a full specification included in an environmental management plan. Also, a five-year habitat management plan (HMP) will be produced for the site. These measures will result in an overall positive residual impact.
Ecology
A desk-based ecological background data search was undertaken to highlight conservation areas and records of internationally, nationally and locally important species. The following field surveys were carried out to identify ecological features and provide information to determine their value: phase 1 habitat survey; detailed botanical survey; hedgerow surveys; survey of grasslands and woodlands; invasive plant survey; and animal surveys for: amphibians; reptiles, wintering birds; breeding birds; bats, badgers; red squirrels; dormice; terrestrial invertebrates; otters, and water voles.
15
Air quality
Construction of the development has the potential to affect local air quality, principally in terms of nuisance dust. Impacts will be controlled and monitored by means of a construction environmental management plan or construction method statement, agreed with the local authority. As a consequence, construction phase impacts would be negligible. Detailed assessment of operational impacts used an atmospheric dispersion computer model, with assumptions that were designed to over-predict pollutant concentrations. Data input to the model included anticipated changes in traffic flows and design data for the energy centre. The primary pollutants assessed were carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and fine dust particles4. Predicted air pollutant concentrations (up to 2027), after adding background pollutant concentrations, were compared with relevant air quality objectives. Every modelled scenario predicted that the relevant short-term and long-term air quality objectives would be achieved. With reference to planning guidance provided by Environmental Protection UK, the results indicate that the overall air quality impact of the development would be negligible.
rooms) in proposed residential properties, would need suitable mitigation to be provided at some dwellings. This is subject to detailed design but may include double glazing and trickle ventilation on some building facades. As well, to achieve suitable noise levels at outdoor living areas, 1.8m high fences will be provided at properties close to Smallbrook Lane. Construction noise will be controlled using standard procedures that will reduce the noise to acceptable levels. The cumulative vibration values at proposed residential units for both day and night time are at levels indicating a low probability of adverse comment; therefore the impact of ground-borne vibration is considered to be not significant. Future increase in traffic flows will generally be less than 20% and on some roads traffic will decrease. However, traffic flows on Carters Road, Smallbrook Lane and Brading Road could increase more than 20%. The resultant increase in road traffic noise would be less than 1.5 dB, which is not significant. It is therefore concluded that, provided the recommended mitigation measures are implemented, the site is suitable for the proposed development and will not result in significant impact.
16
Socio-economics
The development will create employment opportunities during the construction phase, which will last for 13 years. There will also be some new jobs created during the operational phase. 904 new homes will be created by the development, which will contribute towards the IoW Councils target of 2,100 new dwellings in the Ryde area by 2027. Affordable housing units will be included to meet the 35% target. It is expected that around 167 primary school age children and 171 secondary school age children would live in the completed development. The primary school children will be accommodated by a new 2form entry junior mixed infant (JMI) school (ages 4 11) for 420 pupils, which will be built as part of the development. The secondary school age children would be accommodated by the Ryde Academy. As part of the proposed development, a polyclinic or doctors surgery will be provided with at least one GP, which will accommodate the anticipated 1,800 residents of the development. Two multi use sports pitches and changing facilities will be provided as well as a small community centre (to include corner/coffee shop location) and play equipment. The development will provide almost 6 ha of enhanced landscaping and public open space. In addition, enhanced transport linkages such as new bus routes and future access to the existing railway station(s) and to the local public right of way network of footpaths and cycleways would be provided throughout the development. The provision of new homes, employment opportunities, leisure and health facilities, new school and public open space on-site and transport linkages on- and off-site are assessed to be beneficial for the new residents and the existing neighbouring communities.
Traffic
The proposed development site has been designed so that it will be accessible by a range of non-car travel modes. This should encourage the use of existing public transport services in the area and reduce the impact of the development on existing road junctions. Footways will be provided alongside all roads within the site. This will ensure full inter-connectivity between all elements of the proposed development as well as between the proposed development and the surrounding areas. This should encourage residents to walk to places in the vicinity of the site and therefore reduce their dependence on the car. Controlled pedestrian crossing facilities will be installed at major road junctions in and adjacent to the development. Cycle routes and cycle parking provision will be provided within the site to encourage the use of bicycles rather than private cars. Brading Road currently presents an unattractive environment for cycling so improvements to this link in the form of a tree-lined boulevard with separate cycle lane will be made to better cater for this mode of transport. A new footbridge will be provided across the railway to link the development and Smallbrook Stadium. As part of a future upgrade to Smallbrook Junction, the rail station could also be connected. This would reduce private car use.
17
Vehicular access to the proposed development site will be provided from three points around the site connecting to the existing local road network. Smallbrook Lane will be re-directed, while a new junction (a 4-arm roundabout) will be provided on Brading Road. The re-directed Smallbrook Lane will be configured as an attractive boulevard with landscaped central reservation, forming the principal route through the site. It would divert most existing traffic on Smallbrook Lane away from its junction with Great Preston Road and through the proposed development site to the new roundabout on Brading Road. This is likely to cause a significant re-distribution of traffic towards junctions with better capacity and flow pattern. The transport assessment (TA) identified the baseline traffic conditions of the local road network of the site for 2011, using traffic counts at key junctions. It looked at the type of junctions that already exist in the vicinity of the proposed development site and their existing capacity (for 2011 traffic flows). The
TA then used this information to consider the potential impacts that the proposed development might have on the traffic flows and junction capacities subsequent to the completion and occupation of the whole development in 2027, compared to a situation that would occur in 2027 without the proposed development. It is expected that by 2027, six of the nine existing junctions would operate under capacity and with little queuing for both the morning and evening peak periods, an improvement compared to the situation predicted in 2027 without the development (see Table 2). The development proposes to make modifications to the road network and so reduce the level of congestion at significant junctions. With the development, the predicted changes to traffic volume at the three junctions that would be over capacity in 2027 will be small and will not be significant, and two of the three junctions would be over capacity even without the development.
Junctions studied Nicholson Road/Great Preston Road Smallbrook Lane/Great Preston Road / Great Preston Road/Marlborough Road/Bullen Road/ Brading Road (Westridge Cross) A3055 Brading Road/Cothey Way A3055 Brading Road/Tesco access Hornsey Road/A3055 New Road/B3395 Marshcombe Shute/A3055 Morton Road (Yar Cross) Stroudwood Road/Upton Road/Carters Road/ Gatehouse Road Argyll Street/West Street/Green Street Carters Road/Ashey Road/Smallbrook Lane
Over-capacity Over-capacity
Over-capacity
Over-capacity
Over-capacity
Over-capacity Over-capacity
18
At the junction - Carters Road / Ashey Road / Smallbrook Lane - the development would increase the volume of traffic by 13% in the morning peak hour and 20% in the evening peak hour, but the changes would have very little significance at the junction. The development would tip this junction just over capacity on only one arm of the roundabout with the other three arms remaining under capacity. To put this in context, this arm would be close to capacity in 2027 without development, with development traffic adding only a further two vehicles to the queuing.
species and habitats, such as those covered by biodiversity action plans (BAP). Clean and zero/low carbon energy technologies are proposed for the development, including district heating/ CHP and high efficiency gas boilers. Energy efficiency measures will ensure energy demand and associated carbon emissions are minimised. On-site renewable energy is also anticipated for phase 2 onwards in the form of roof-mounted photovoltaic (PV) panels in order to further reduce carbon emissions. The development will therefore make a substantial contribution to climate change mitigation, as well as to climate change adaptation in the form of flood protection, surface water runoff attenuation, rainwater harvesting and potable water use efficiency. A high quality internal environment is anticipated for residents, including noise insulation above minimum building regulations standards, good levels of daylighting and access to private and public outdoor space, including a range of amenity and leisure/ play uses for residents and other users. The creation of quality open spaces promotes healthy living through providing places to walk, cycle and exercise, bringing people together and nurturing community spirit through shared spaces. In addition to applying the waste hierarchy during construction, the development will incorporate convenient and accessible waste reception and sorting facilities for residents that promote the separation and recycling of relevant waste streams. The selection of construction and finishing materials will be informed by their environmental performance among other considerations, with reference made to the green guide for specification to optimise the specification of high scoring materials. All timber will be FSC certified. The use of innovative and low environmental impact construction materials will be explored and developed during detailed design.
Sustainability
Interaction between the master plan designers and the EIA team ensured that sustainability concerns were embedded in the design from the earliest stage. In addition, a detailed sustainability assessment was completed for the scheme, including code for sustainable homes and BREEAM pre-assessments, district heating/ CHP (combined heat and power) feasibility, and SAP modelling (energy and carbon performance of new buildings). Site construction activities will be managed and monitored to ensure the potential for nuisance impacts to local receptors such as dust, noise and construction traffic/ plant is minimised. A range of protection measures will also be implemented to safeguard local environmental conditions in respect of ecology, air, ground and water. The minimisation, sorting and recycling/ re-use of construction materials will form a key component of the developments construction-phase sustainability credentials, for which a site waste management plan with appropriate targets will be prepared. In addition to protecting local ecology during construction, the completed development will incorporate a range of ecological enhancement measures to benefit key
19
Pennyfeathers therefore fulfils the sustainable development expectations of the national planning policy framework and Isle of Wight Core Strategy by supporting sustainable economic development through the delivery of high quality homes and creating a thriving local place.
20
CONTACT DETAILS
The person to contact for further information on the project is: Mr Glen Hepburn Hepburns Planning Consultancy Ltd Cheeks Farm, Merstone Lane Merstone Isle of Wight, PO30 3DE Tel: (01983) 522100 Email: enquiries@hepburns.net If you would like to comment on any aspect of the ES or non-technical summary or you would like to make an appointment to view the documents, then please contact Ms Sarah Wilkinson, principal planning officer, at the following address: Planning Services Isle of Wight Council Seaclose Offices Fairlee Road Newport Isle of Wight, PO30 2QS Tel: (01983) 823552 Email: Sarah.Wilkinson@IOW.gov.uk
21