construction, civil engg, cost,

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

11 views

construction, civil engg, cost,

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- 16 Brochure
- Semester II Lab Practice 11-502211
- Steel+Construction+Manual+Design+Examples,+V14.0+part+4+of+4
- Ghali, Amin_ Neville, Adam - Structural Analysis _ a Unified Classical and Matrix Approach, Seventh Edition (2017, Taylor and Francis)
- PREZENTARE AEFA
- Calculation Note -Piperack No.5_Rev-B1
- Design and analysis of G+6 building report.docx
- Structural Design 00 Scot u of t
- Design of Beams
- LatPileB
- OlderCodes
- ANSYS LAB
- Nn 23271
- slabs slides.pdf
- Syllabus UG NIT Agartala
- Aerator Pipliya Narayan
- 9A21402 Aerospace Vechicle Structures I
- BPSC-AE-MAINS-2019-QUESTION-PAPER-CIVIL-ENGINEERING-PAPER-I.pdf
- Input Data Anchor2
- Analysis and Design Unit III

You are on page 1of 4

ROBERT F. LORENZ

To the discerning structural engineer, changes in specification rules always offer an economic opportunity to find new and better ways to implement savings in material or labor costs. In a subtle manner, a 1978 AISC Specification rule change for partial composite design of steel flexural members strongly improved the opportunity to make important economic savings in optimizing the floor system costs. The change was simply the introduction of a squareroot power instead of a linear relationship in Specification Eq. (1.11). The revised equation now reads: Seff = Ss + (V h/Vh)1/2(Str Ss) where Seff = effective section modulus of transformed composite section referred to its bottom flange, in.3 Ss = section modulus of steel beam referred to its bottom flange, in.3 Str = section modulus of transformed composite section referred to its bottom flange, based upon maximum permitted effective width of concrete flange (Sect. 1.11.1), in.3 Vh = horizontal shear to be resisted between the point of maximum positive moment and the point of zero moment for full composite action V'h = horizontal shear to be resisted between the point of maximum positive moment and the point of zero moment for partial composite action As shown in Fig. 1, the new rule permits partial composite action when the effective horizontal shear force between the beam and the concrete slab is between 25% to 100% of the full composite horizontal shear value. With the new formula, a broader selection of more economical design alternatives is now possible. There remains only the

Robert F. Lorenz is Regional Manager, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.

problem of examining those available beam shapes that, when combined with a given concrete slab, will render the least-cost selection. Because of the deterministic nature of the properties of available steel beams to be selected, the solution can best be described in a graphical manner. In order to develop a convenient investigative tool for examining partial composite design alternatives, advantage can be taken of selecting certain standard design conditions for the materials. The selected conditions are: 1. Structural steel: ASTM A36 2. Concrete: Normal weight f'c = 3.0 ksi 3. Headed stud shear connectors = in. dia. 4. Uniformly loaded simply supported beam 5. Assume steel stress controls horizontal shear, Vh

Figure 1

2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher.

Fig. 2. Partial composite beam economy chart;y = 36 ksi, fc = 3.0 ksi, 5-in. normal weight concrete F

2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher.

By manipulation of the above design criteria, it can be shown that for the full composite action, the above conditions yield: Ns = 0.928 Ws where Ns = number of stud shear connectors per beam Ws = weight of the beam in pounds per foot For a more conservative approach, which accounts for usual rounding-up design procedures, we can state: Ns = Ws From this we can set up the following cost relationship: Cost index = Ws(LCb + vCs) where L = Beam span (ft) Cb = Mill cost of steel ($/lb) Cs = Cost of installed headed stud shear connector ($/stud) v = V'h/Vh = percentage shear connection Armed with this relationship for the above mentioned standard conditions, realistic cost estimates of several beam selections can be made. These will vary from the heaviest beam (non-composite) through several intermediate selections (partial composite) down to the theoretical lightest beam (full composite). For a given external design condition of loading, beam spacing and span, it is obvious that there is a decreasing need for shear connectors as the beam weight increases. In other words, a trade-off between beam weight and shear connector requirements is created. From a cost point of view, only a knowledge of the mill price of the structural steel and the average price of an installed shear connector is required to develop convenient equations for accurate cost relationships. A nomogram can be developed to graphically illustrate how to select the low-cost choice for a series of beamconnector combinations. By inputting load and floor geometry, an array of design possibilities may be charted as shown in Fig. 2. In this case, it has been assumed that Cb = $0.30/lb and Cs = $2.00/stud are currently typical cost factors and that the normal weight plain concrete slab has a thickness of 5 in. The transformed section modulus Str has been taken directly from the Composite Beam Selection Table as found in the AISC Manual.1 By the utilization of such an economy chart, each partially composite beam that meets the design load and geometry conditions can be compared economically, and the beam with the lowest cost index should be chosen as the optimum selection. Variations from the assumed conditions can be developed in the same manner, although it would introduce slightly more complex relationships. Also, adjustments for variation in actual regional cost factors should be considered when applying the proposed procedure. 80

EXAMPLE PROBLEM Assume the following conditions for a composite floor beam system using ASTM A36 steel: Beam Span: Beam Spacing: Concrete Slab: 30ft 10ft 5 in. normal weight concrete; f'c = 3.0 ksi Shear Connectors: in. dia. Loads: Construction: 48 psf Superimposed: 112 psf Total 160 psf Required Section Modulus: 90 in.3 Selections that meet the design requirements are listed in Table 1. The obvious selection is indicated by the minimum cost index, and a W1835 with 22 shear connectors shows a savings of $21 compared to the W1636 selection. It is interesting to note that the most economical selection is not represented by the beam utilizing the most shear connectors. Using conventional composite design practices, a full composite design would suggest a W1636 using 34 shear beam connectors, which would have a cost index of $392. This would be a $33 premium cost per beam over the more optimum selection indicated above. The use of the nomogram offers an even more convenient and time-saving method, as well as providing the designer with a large-canvas approach to the problem. As shown in Fig. 2 (dotted lines), the preliminary selection can be quickly made without calculations. A study of the design alternatives indicates that the most economical selection usually is the fully composite lowest beam-weight with shear connector requirements reduced just enough to meet the design requirements. The basic reason that the W1835 was the optimum selection in the example was that it initially represented a more economical bare steel section over the W1636. This realization provides one with an easy short-cut approach. However, in some cases, it is possible that a heavier beam-weight with fewer studs may be even more economical, and this could be checked by means of the optimization procedure.

Table 1 Beam W2150 W1840 W1640 W1835 W1636 W1636 V'h/Vh 0 0.26 0.38 0.67 0.78 1.00 Vh 212 212 185 191 191 V'h 53 83 122 153 191 Ns 0 10 16 22 28 34 Cost Index $450 381 390 359 380 392

2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher.

Thus, a general rule that can be followed to minimize composite beam cost is to: 1. Select the most economical steel beam (least weight) which has a fully composite bending capacity greater than or equal to the design requirement; the AISC Manual Composite Beam Selection Table and Moment of Inertia Selection Table can help in this regard. 2. Reduce bending capacity to meet the actual design requirements by specifying partial composite action with less shear connectors. 3. Check several heavier beam-weights with even fewer shear connectors that may show further improved economy.

Once selected, the optimized beam then can be investigated for further secondary checks for shear, deflection, buckling, etc. Because economy in selection of members is always an important task for the structural designer of structural steel floor systems, the use of the alternatives offered by the partial composite concepts should be utilized with such economical objectives in mind. The method shown in this paper provides a simple and quick approach that offers a cost-conscious dimension to the designer.

REFERENCES

Steel Construction, Chicago, 1980

2003 by American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher.

- Semester II Lab Practice 11-502211Uploaded byAshif Iqubal
- Steel+Construction+Manual+Design+Examples,+V14.0+part+4+of+4Uploaded byremi1988
- 16 BrochureUploaded byFrank John
- Ghali, Amin_ Neville, Adam - Structural Analysis _ a Unified Classical and Matrix Approach, Seventh Edition (2017, Taylor and Francis)Uploaded bysunny
- PREZENTARE AEFAUploaded byIon Iovita
- Calculation Note -Piperack No.5_Rev-B1Uploaded byarun kumar c
- Design and analysis of G+6 building report.docxUploaded byArbaz Hussain
- Structural Design 00 Scot u of tUploaded byJeremy White
- Design of BeamsUploaded byNayan Fatania
- LatPileBUploaded bymr.xinbombay
- OlderCodesUploaded byAmoula Ahmed
- ANSYS LABUploaded byPraveen Kumar
- Nn 23271Uploaded byTasi Zafir
- slabs slides.pdfUploaded byoxana151
- Syllabus UG NIT AgartalaUploaded byDevil King
- Aerator Pipliya NarayanUploaded byankkeshmundra1
- 9A21402 Aerospace Vechicle Structures IUploaded bysivabharathamurthy
- BPSC-AE-MAINS-2019-QUESTION-PAPER-CIVIL-ENGINEERING-PAPER-I.pdfUploaded byIndian Indian
- Input Data Anchor2Uploaded bysonofalexander
- Analysis and Design Unit IIIUploaded byrat
- 1,9, 10,11Uploaded byUzair Maqbool Khan
- DesignUploaded byJose Miguel Ccoto
- Assaignment 3 of Highrise Building Asmeer 20161026Uploaded byVisuvaratnam Suseendran
- 3 2 4 a beamanalysisshortcutsUploaded byapi-300375532
- Test Question PoolUploaded byRonald Liaw
- 1Uploaded byكرم عمرو
- High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete - OverviewUploaded byhaoude9
- 105492-S0010Uploaded byHenriel Hao
- Estructuras de ContencionUploaded byAndrés Barragán
- Lecture 23Uploaded byKevin Robert

- Mahabharata VOL 1Uploaded byFernando Rossi
- Process Plant Piping OverviewUploaded byskdalalsin
- Human Sexuality - A Theosophical Analysis.pdfUploaded bykapurrrn
- beyond_good_and_evil_by_fredrich_nietzscheUploaded byAra Amouha
- Life Cycle Analysis for Heavy VehiclesUploaded bykapurrrn
- ANSI Vs API Pump Comparison.pdfUploaded bykapurrrn
- the substance of a dream.pdfUploaded bykapurrrn
- Software Cost EstimateUploaded bykapurrrn
- ft-pr-3Uploaded byvictorsondavis
- A Mathematicians Apology - CommentsUploaded bykapurrrn
- JugaadUploaded byAdityaDembla
- Currencies and EconomicsUploaded bykapurrrn
- Bali DaanUploaded bykapurrrn
- An Explanation of Low Energy Nuclear ReactionUploaded byAzhan Ahmed
- Unit ConversionUploaded byBauyrzhan Zhumabek
- Project FinanceUploaded byKunal Maheshwari
- 09-07PastRationalManUploaded bykapurrrn
- well to wheels - fossil fuelsUploaded bykapurrrn
- Aviation Fuel 2003 Report 7294712Uploaded bykapurrrn
- Ten Things About the LCFSUploaded bykapurrrn
- Cost of Capital BVU2011_12_CzaplinskiUploaded bykapurrrn
- Heavy Crude Processing 808157080Uploaded bykapurrrn
- LNG Master Sales Agreement & Their Value in a Destination Flexible LNG Market - Steven MilesUploaded bykapurrrn
- HitlerUploaded bykapurrrn
- Escalation on Major ProjectsUploaded bykapurrrn
- Punjabi AmritaUploaded bykapurrrn
- Punjabi PoetryUploaded bykapurrrn

- Chap.2Uploaded bydchy
- Numerical simulation of Novorossiysk bora and related wind waves using the WRF-ARW and SWAN modelsUploaded byBoško Janjušević
- PAUT - Mode ConversionUploaded byMohsin Iam
- Reinforced EarthUploaded byPradeepLokhande
- Wj_1990_01_s14 Microalloying Additions and Weld Fracture Toughness in Hsla SteelsUploaded byŞükrü_talaş
- Lecture9.HandoutsUploaded byfarhan danish
- STK1121_LabManual_2017.pdfUploaded bymirayeollie
- Heat transfer – a review of 2000 literatureUploaded byAdinath Shirsat
- RS AGGARWAL 10TH MATHS FORMULA Mw9bk78qq Doyouneedbook PartyUploaded bygrsruacl
- Analysis of Friction and Lubrication Conditions of Concrete/Formwork InterfacesUploaded byInternational Journal for Scientific Research and Development - IJSRD
- i2S EnglishUploaded bysystemcoding
- Summary _02.pdfUploaded byImran Mirza
- 3.2.1 - Instrumentation_ MeasurementUploaded byFnur Fatihah
- June 2013 (R) QP - Unit 2 Edexcel PhysicsUploaded bynaamashir
- ASTM B 221 - 05Uploaded byAnonymous rmbxeKnS
- A ThermodynA thermodynamic theory of solid viscoelasticity PART 1amic Theory of Solid Viscoelasticity PART 1Uploaded byLuis Carlos Rojas Torres
- Design and Development of a Pendulum Type Dynamic Vibration Absorber for a Sdof Vibrating System Subjected to Base ExcitationUploaded byIAEME Publication
- Soil PlasticityUploaded byrameshbabu_1979
- 5_6163526649582190624Uploaded byamit
- 10.1.1.454.9344.pdfUploaded byace7721
- gold1Uploaded by1051988
- Thetaprobe PrinciplesUploaded byMuhammad Arifin
- Martensite in SteelUploaded bycorsamaxx
- ZPE-MaximalEntropyPUploaded byheoca
- Prawitz, 2018 - The Fundamental Problem of General Proof TheoryUploaded byAnderson Luis Nakano
- Composite Strip Specimen With a Center HoleUploaded bymuhanned
- A Review of Niobium-Tantalum Separation in Hydro MetallurgyUploaded byduverney.gaviria
- vibration analysis of composite beamUploaded byAbhishek Mahto
- Scisor Jack PresentationUploaded bygemechu mengistu
- Hankel TransformUploaded byAndrei Ioan