22 views

Uploaded by Ajit Kumar K

My work on perceptual mapping

- Consumer Perceived Value - The Development of a Multiple Item Scale
- Chinese Version of the St George Resp Questionnaire in COPD
- Aptitude Testing
- Exploring Consumer Status and Conspicuous Consumption
- METHODOLOGY.docx
- Add Note Bab3
- Effect of Caregiver-child Interactions on Play Occupations Among Young Children Institutionalized in Eastern Europe
- 081717
- Therapists as Patients - A National Survey of Psychologists' Experiences, Problems, and Beliefs
- Journal Spine 1
- mv
- Project report on customer satisfaction of flat buyers
- Chnoncog8
- 1741-7015-9-100
- Ronald Paper
- Factor Analysis
- med_mds
- 5_BrandIdentity&Positioning.pdf
- Entrepreneur
- Act It Ud Profesional

You are on page 1of 4

Perceptual mapping - Perceptual mapping is a diagrammatic technique used by asset marketers that attempts to visually display the perceptions of customers or potential customers. Typically the position of a product, product line, brand, or company is displayed relative to their competition. Perceptual maps can have any number of dimensions but the most common is two dimensions. The first perceptual map below shows consumer perceptions of various automobiles on the two dimensions of sportiness/conservative and classy/affordable. This sample of consumers felt Porsche was the sportiest and classiest of the cars in the study (top right corner). They felt Plymouth was most practical and conservative (bottom left corner).

Cars that are positioned close to each other are seen as similar on the relevant dimensions by the consumer. For example consumers see Buick, Chrysler, and Oldsmobile as similar. They are close competitors and form a competitive grouping. A company considering the introduction of a new model will look for an area on the map free from competitors. Some perceptual maps use different size circles to indicate the sales volume or market share of the various competing products. Perceptual maps need not come from a detailed study. There are also intuitive maps (also called judgmental maps or consensus maps) that are created by marketers based on their understanding of their industry. Management uses its best judgment. It is questionable how valuable this type of map is. Often they just give the appearance of credibility to managements preconceptions.

Multidimensional scaling

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is a set of related statistical techniques often used in information visualization for exploring similarities or dissimilarities in data. MDS is a special case of ordination. An MDS algorithm starts with a matrix of itemitem similarities, then assigns a location to each item in N-dimensional space, where N is specified a priori. For sufficiently small N, the resulting locations may be displayed in a graph or 3D visualisation.

Types Classical multidimensional scaling Also known as Principal Coordinates Analysis, Torgerson Scaling or TorgersonGower scaling. Takes an input matrix giving dissimilarities between pairs of items and outputs a coordinate matrix whose configuration minimizes a loss function called strain. Metric multidimensional scaling A superset of classical MDS that generalizes the optimization procedure to a variety of loss functions and input matrices of known distances with weights and other variables. A useful loss function in this context is called stress, which is often minimized using a procedure called stress majorization. Non-metric multidimensional scaling In contrast to metric MDS, non-metric MDS finds both a non-parametric monotonic relationship between the dissimilarities in the item-item matrix and the Euclidean distances between items, and the location of each item in the low-dimensional space. The relationship is typically found using isotonic regression. Generalized multidimensional scaling An extension of metric multidimensional scaling, in which the target space is an arbitrary smooth non-Euclidean space. In case when the dissimilarities are distances on a surface and the target space is another surface, GMDS allows finding the minimum-distortion embedding of one surface into another. Steps in conducting MDS research: 1) Formulating the problem What variables do you want to compare? How many variables do you want to compare? More than 20 is often considered cumbersome. Fewer than 8 (4 pairs) will not give valid results. What purpose is the study to be used for? 2) Obtaining input data Respondents are asked a series of questions. For each product pair, they are asked to rate similarity (usually on a 7 point Likert scale from very similar to very dissimilar). The first question could be for Coke/Pepsi for example, the next for Coke/Hires rootbeer, the next for Pepsi/Dr Pepper, the next for Dr Pepper/Hires rootbeer, etc. The number of questions is a function of the number of brands and can be calculated as Q = N (N - 1) / 2 where Q is the number of questions and N is the number of brands. This approach is referred to as the Perception data : direct approach. There are two other approaches. There is the Perception data : derived approach in which products are decomposed into attributes that are rated on a semantic differential scale. The other is the Preference data approach in which respondents are asked their preference rather than similarity. 3) Running the MDS statistical program Software for running the procedure is available in many software for statistics. Often there is a choice between Metric MDS (which deals with interval or ratio level data), and Nonmetric MDS (which deals with ordinal data). 4) Decide number of dimensions The researcher must decide on the number of dimensions they want the computer to create. The more dimensions, the better the statistical fit, but the more difficult it is to interpret the results. 5) Mapping the results and defining the dimensions The statistical program (or a related module) will map the results. The map will plot each product (usually in two dimensional space). The proximity of products to each other indicates either how similar they are or how preferred

they are, depending on which approach was used. The dimensions must be labelled by the researcher. This requires subjective judgment and is often very challenging. 6) Test the results for reliability and validity Compute R-squared to determine what proportion of variance of the scaled data can be accounted for by the MDS procedure. An R-square of 0.6 is considered the minimum acceptable level. An R-square of 0.8 is considered good for metric scaling and .9 is considered good for non-metric scaling. Other possible tests are Kruskals Stress, split data tests, data stability tests (i.e., eliminating one brand), and test-retest reliability. 7) Report the results comprehensively Along with the mapping, at least distance measure (e.g., Sorenson index, Jaccard index) and reliability (e.g., stress value) should be given. It is also very advisable to give the algorithm (e.g., Kruskal, Mather), which is often defined by the program used (sometimes replacing the algorithm report), if you have given a start configuration or had a random choice, the number of runs, the assessment of dimensionality, the Monte Carlo method results, the number of iterations, the assessment of stability, and the proportional variance of each axis (r-square).

1) Factor analysis Factor analysis is a statistical method used to describe variability among observed, correlated variables in terms of a potentially lower number of unobserved variables called factors. In other words, it is possible, for example, that variations in three or four observed variables mainly reflect the variations in fewer unobserved variables. Factor analysis searches for such joint variations in response to unobserved latent variables. The observed variables are modelled as linear combinations of the potential factors, plus "error" terms. The information gained about the interdependencies between observed variables can be used later to reduce the set of variables in a dataset. Computationally this technique is equivalent to low rank approximation of the matrix of observed variables. Factor analysis originated in psychometrics, and is used in behavioral sciences, social sciences, marketing, product management, operations research, and other applied sciences that deal with large quantities of data. 2) Conjoint analysis Conjoint analysis is a statistical technique used in market research to determine how people value different features that make up an individual product or service. The objective of conjoint analysis is to determine what combination of a limited number of attributes is most influential on respondent choice or decision making. A controlled set of potential products or services is shown to respondents and by analyzing how they make preferences between these products, the implicit valuation of the individual elements making up the product or service can be determined. These implicit valuations (utilities or part-worths) can be used to create market models that estimate market share, revenue and even profitability of new designs 3) Logit analysis Logit analysis is a statistical technique used by marketers to assess the scope of customer acceptance of a product, particularly a new product. It attempts to determine the intensity or magnitude of customers' purchase intentions and translates that into a measure of actual buying behaviour. Logit analysis assumes that an unmet need in the marketplace has already been detected, and that the product has been designed to meet that need. The purpose of logit analysis is to quantify the potential sales of that product. It takes survey data on consumers purchase intentions and converts it into actual purchase probabilities.

1) Customer perception on a product may not tested on quantitative measures. 2) Perceptual maps (also called judgmental maps or consensus maps) that are created by marketers based on their understanding of their industry. Management uses its best judgment. It is questionable how valuable this type of map is. Often they just give the appearance of credibility to managements preconceptions. 3) Similarity vs. Preference: Determine whether the brands will be compared on the basis of their similarity or of their preference. Similarity-based perceptual maps reflect brand similarities and dimensions of comparison, but dont provide any insights into why the brands are chosen. Preference-based perceptual maps, on the other hand, reflect preferred choices, but consumers may compare brands on different dimensions that dont match the similarity-based perceptual maps. Two brands can be perceived as different in a similarity-based perceptual map, but similar in a preference-based perceptual map (e.g. two brands of hair products perceived as different, but equally preferred). 4) Relevancy: All relevant brands in a product category should be included as the omission of key brands or inclusion of inappropriate brands will have an impact on the derived dimensions and the relative positioning of the brands in the perceptual space. 5) Comparability: Make sure that the brands or products are comparable in the eye of the consumer. Brands should have a common characteristic (objective or perceived) that consumers can use for comparison (e.g. clothing brands, snacks, alcoholic beverages, etc.). 6) Number of brands evaluated: It is important to strike a balance between the required number of brands to find a stable multidimensional map, an acceptable level of model fit and the effort required on the part of the respondent to evaluate a number of brands. It is recommended to have more than four times as many brands as dimensions to obtain a stable solution and avoid overfitting problems, so trade-offs are necessary regarding the number of desired dimensions and the burden put on respondents so that data quality doesnt degrade too quickly as it happens with long surveys.

- Consumer Perceived Value - The Development of a Multiple Item ScaleUploaded byHari Zainuddin Rasyid
- Chinese Version of the St George Resp Questionnaire in COPDUploaded byKenny Wong
- Aptitude TestingUploaded bytahminauos
- Exploring Consumer Status and Conspicuous ConsumptionUploaded bylieu_hyacinth
- METHODOLOGY.docxUploaded byHarka Mee
- Add Note Bab3Uploaded byMastura Hussin
- Effect of Caregiver-child Interactions on Play Occupations Among Young Children Institutionalized in Eastern EuropeUploaded byHardeep Singh Bali
- 081717Uploaded byGabriella Mae Magpayo Valentin
- Therapists as Patients - A National Survey of Psychologists' Experiences, Problems, and BeliefsUploaded byIwan Saputra
- Journal Spine 1Uploaded byLina Ukago
- mvUploaded bybarbarabento
- Project report on customer satisfaction of flat buyersUploaded byMithun Mohan
- Chnoncog8Uploaded byUsman Ahmed
- 1741-7015-9-100Uploaded bygabitzaujica
- Ronald PaperUploaded bySarah Frances Alambra
- Factor AnalysisUploaded byArshad Baig Mughal
- med_mdsUploaded byAman Gupta
- 5_BrandIdentity&Positioning.pdfUploaded bySergio Alejandro
- EntrepreneurUploaded bySyahrul Riza
- Act It Ud ProfesionalUploaded bySylvia Abigail Vargas Sanchez
- Proficiency Indicators for Philippine STEAMUploaded byRieza Escaño
- IMDS1 (1).pdfUploaded byAnil Kumar
- EFFECT OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE OF ANIMAL FEEDS MANUFACTURERS IN KIAMBU AND NAIROBI CITY COUNTIESUploaded byGeorge Muriuki
- Lecture 11 Factor AnalysisUploaded byKhurram Sheraz
- Types of Factor AnalysisUploaded byMohammed Bilal
- The Financial Management Behavior ScaleUploaded byFreddy Jr Perez
- AbstractUploaded byajinkya_patil_11
- Y Gen’s Online Buying Behavior: Indonesian CaseUploaded byinventionjournals
- CCAUploaded bydheeraj mathew
- Mark_et_al-2019-Journal_of_School_Health.pdfUploaded byR

- NSITUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Insurance Awareness techniquesUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- 10115Uploaded byTamal Bhattacharya
- Guidelines for Projcr ReportUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Toyota Car RecallUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Income Inequality and Elasticity of Personal Income Tax.pdf AggarwalUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Answers of Managerial Economics Homework1Uploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Snowbreeze 4Uploaded bynsitdce
- Brand ManagementUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Brand Positioning StrategiesUploaded bydeepaksahil
- IES OBJ Electrical Engineering 2008 Paper IIUploaded byjiten
- List of apliances.docxUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Livestock MarketingUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Every indianUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Article - Impact of Kids on Purchases.pdfUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- 4 Steps For Customer Focus.pdfUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Territory Manager JD.docUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Sale of goodsUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Product Positioning StrategiesUploaded byParas J. Anwer
- Mercedes India Competitive strategiesUploaded byRitika Sharma
- BIS Project 2Uploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Melvin CorpUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Mercedes BenzUploaded bySantosh Shirodkar
- Apple Inc.Uploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Wringing more value from advertising dollars: the customer satisfaction boostUploaded byAjit Kumar K
- Syllabus FMS, DelhiUploaded byAjit Kumar K

- Data Collection-Measurement and Scaling TechniquesUploaded byRavishankar Ulle
- [Joseph b. Kruskal, Myron Wish] Multidimensional ScalingUploaded bycorreage
- - Bajaj AutoUploaded bySunny Verma
- 29314342 Customer Preferences Specific Brands of Bikes TVS HONDA and BAJAJUploaded byParshant Garg
- A New Drug-Shelf Arrangement for Reducing MedicatiUploaded byEmmanuel Lawer
- Stata ExcelUploaded bychompoonoot
- FastMap- A Fast Algorithm for Indexing Data-mining and VisualizaUploaded byBartoszSowul
- proxscal-1Uploaded byapi-3765641
- Exploring explanatory models of women’s reproductiveUploaded by1032maj
- 06_MDSUploaded bySivi Almanaf Ali Shahab
- analisis MDSUploaded byBarnabas Djafar
- Multidimensional ScalingUploaded byPankaj2c
- Chapter 10Uploaded byDrNagunuri Srinivas
- Multidimensional ScalingUploaded byhsrinivas_7
- Past Part2Uploaded byesperancia
- Vegan TutorUploaded byddaltonico
- statistical_toolbox_manual.pdfUploaded byLyly Magnan
- Demo MdsUploaded byNovia Widya
- Comparison Between Principal Coordinate AnalysisUploaded byEmmclan Lau
- Consumer PreferenceUploaded bySaeed Muhammed
- Genuine-simulated Suicide Notes PaperUploaded byDiana Smith
- 123-dfadf-neilhtimm-860-1-applied_-l-540-581Uploaded byMira Bela Islami
- Audio Musical Timbre CAMO Final (1)Uploaded bySbsBrbno
- Multi Dimensional ScalingUploaded bydreamboi
- Carillo 2019Uploaded byMellya Rizki
- Multidimensional ScalingUploaded bySukhwinder Singh Baath
- Multidimensional scalingUploaded byJatinder Saini
- dissertation report of vikas sudanUploaded byapi-3759085
- Ronald PaperUploaded bySarah Frances Alambra
- St 3011 Slides 11Uploaded byNovia Widya