You are on page 1of 5

A Project report on the article of DHAVAL MEHTA “Further exploitation of the poor countries are poor because of Globalization

, Globalization is insufficient because it does not determine.”

Submitted By:- Tarsaria Alpesh T. Roll No.:- 45 Section:- B Submitted To:- Prof. Dr. Vinod B. Patel

Further exploitation of the poor countries are poor because of Globalization, Globalization is insufficient because it does not determine. Management - Dhawal Mehta China adopted by the head Denge the concept of free market compition and because of this world have plenty of surprises. Synchronize the start of the Communist government and free competition both hungry tiger and goat industry people like synchronization was also successful in the synchronization. Globalization world over that the dispute has been ongoing for under globalization was originally going to be a dispute. Industrialization began in England in AD Then in 1750 the richest regions and poor regions of the world economic difference between the two and one proof. It is only in the last 60 years, China, India and some Southeast Asian countries could consider the economic development. Thus it happened that the two conflicting answers. Some believe that in the last 60 years, globalization has led to a lot of poor countries (China, India and other Southeast Asian countries) are back. His response to them is that in poor countries, so it was a lot less globalization. An example of industry, non-African countries. Both sides have strong arguments to support. It also says that many of the poorest countries in the world are behind many countries in the Western world that their colonization. These settlements worlds rich countries (including India), an enslaved man who knows it all, but today nearly 150 years of Latin American countries were already independent but relatively poor condition that it can be explained how ten? Across China Slavery in Western countries, China was never under the British rule in some parts of China until 1949, however. To counter the argument that the Western community that free markets created by international trade and colonial binoloniala poor countries and poor countries rich in mineral

substances and they were stolen commodities (eg, cotton, tea), which resulted in poor countries too importing cheaper prices very few indigenous people of the mine that some crops (tea, coffee, etc.) became a multimillionaire by the export sector. In short, the countries industrialize on the margin of poverty and they do not export commodities (some crops) and export of mineral substances that stick to the handful of people have received the benefit of their country. Before the Industrial Revolution really a lot of cottage industries in the powered home (domestic), but they destroyed their businesses in Latin America and Asian countries deindustrialization that were known for their cottage industries and millions of people were employed in the destruction of the class and many of them became farmers. In this special time. AD Industrial production in Europe six times increase during the 1750 to 1913 period, Asia and Latin American countries when it has only one-third. Europe's textile and other factory manufactured very large stocks in developing countries because they are currently prepared (manufactured) goods produced AD Since 1830 to 1900 During the 70 years done half. It is only in the last 250 years (AD 1950 after the Industrial Revolution), Asia and Latin American countries and in some African countries. Between Asia and African countries, African countries in this regard that the difference is not a cottage industry in the tradition of the strong tradition of cottage industries in Asian countries and the industrial revolution, the world 'Workshops' were considered. Plantation crops such as cocoa and minerals in the African countries that benefited from the western world.

Argentina the lack of industries, only economy
Here are Latin American countries; Argentina is interested in the case. fertile plains of Argentina (crops) is there because of the cattle industry (meat industry) there are plenty of large landholders, but there are other industries with relatively

low standing in the pose. The landlords dominated its politics and the economy suffered from a lack of other industries has been suspended. This is compared to America's southern states 'cattle industry' (Because of meat industry), some people become richer, they had a large 'cattle ranches' (thousands of acres for cattle breeding grounds), but ownership of major industries and debris America's northern states (particularly steel ) established and he's made America's southern states. Gentry broken their power and American businessmen are the fruits of development reached. AD America's decade of civil war in 1860 that it was also important to this issue. America lost landlords and businessmen won.

Japanese industries due to the prosperity
Japan also AD 1868 first exporter of raw materials and lined materials (Western countries base), but the importer had a reputation as AD Their economic and political industrialization the there’s Meiji government in 1868, mechanization and industrialization of intense agitation stirred running and running state industries and helped them a lot. As a result, Japan became more prosperous and regarded for many years (even though the Asian country) as a lot of the increased industrial and wealthy country. Japan for two things, a lot of emphasis on this. Infrastructural development and public education (public education), the industry's only against they need to study the history of Japan. Japan sent a lot of people and a lot of Western countries, a large number of technical studies in their home countries and invite foreign engineers and technician to work industries in their own country. AD World Class Textile industry development in Japan in 1914 and the British Textile imports from the country had almost zero. Japanese Textile goods is more good then the foreign goods in quality.

China
China has intensified the pace of industrialization. AD After 1978 its per capita income growth rate of 8.3 percent mean that China has adopted a strategy to grapple foreign markets. China adopted the concept of race head denge free market world plenty of surprises. Synchronize the start of the Communist government and free competition both hungry tiger and goat industry people like synchronization was successful in that the synchronization is also another big surprise. AD In 1978, China's economy was still rural in the urban economy. Today there are millions of units running successful. China than India has attracted foreign capital to encourage China exports a lot but does not import very encouraging. China joined the globalization process, but his condition did not controlled in some respects to the World Trade Organization.

Conclosion
There is a world of poverty and poor countries are still insufficient due to the more or less Globalization Globalization is excessive because it is not clear. Despite the enormous public opinion against globalization in the economic progress India has adopted a policy of liberalization. China also said that even if it is a not same. This world is all the poorer countries due to poverty, exploitation of the rich countries. It is not enough proof for where rich countries settlements (colonies) was also poor in those countries and nations in the colonies and fifty years later, the poor are free. Colonies in the Western world has been dominated by the economic collapse may not be true. Rather years after the last fifty or sixty years and advanced technology of the Western community's economic development, this is now in danger.