Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 901 Filed 03/01/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 22772

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION __________________________________________ ) ) I/P ENGINE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) AOL, INC. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________)

Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF I/P ENGINE, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY

Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. (“I/P Engine”), by counsel, for its Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority, states as follows: ARGUMENT Good cause exists for the Court to grant I/P Engine leave to file the Notice of Supplemental Authority. The Notice identifies new authority that is directly related to the Court’s determination of Defendants’ Renewed JMOL on Damages (D.I. 833). On February 26, 2013, after the close of briefing on Defendants’ Renewed JMOL on Damages, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an opinion in VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 6:10-cv-417, D.I. 732 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2013). In VirnetX, the Court denied a defendant’s JMOL on damages where the defendant, like the defendants here, argued that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence of a royalty base.

Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 901 Filed 03/01/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID# 22773

See Opinion, pp. 23-25. As in this case, the defendant in VirnetX “failed to advance a credible alternative” at trial. Id. at 25. For the foregoing reasons, I/P Engine respectfully requests that the Court grant it leave to file Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Notice of Supplemental Authority. Dated: March 1, 2013 I/P ENGINE, INC.

By:

/s/ W. Ryan Snow Of Counsel

Donald C. Schultz, VSB No. 30531 W. Ryan Snow, VSB No. 47423 CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 1500 Norfolk, Virginia 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 dschultz@cwm-law.com wrsnow@cwm-law.com Jeffrey K. Sherwood, VSB No. 19222 Frank C. Cimino, Jr. Kenneth W. Brothers Dawn Rudenko Albert Charles J. Monterio, Jr. DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 Counsel for I/P Engine, Inc.

2

Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 901 Filed 03/01/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID# 22774

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 1st day of March 2013 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to the following: Stephen Edward Noona Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. 150 W Main St, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 senoona@kaufcan.com David Bilsker David Perlson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Robert L. Burns Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 robert.burns@finnegan.com Cortney S. Alexander Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 3500 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 94111 cortney.alexander@finnegan.com

/s/ W. Ryan Snow

3

I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al, Docket No. 2:11-cv-00512 (E.D. Va. Sept 15, 2011), Court Docket

General Information

Case Name Docket Number Court Nature of Suit Related Opinion(s)

I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al 2:11-cv-00512 United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Property Rights: Patent 283 F.R.D. 322 874 F. Supp. 2d 510 2012 BL 329705

© 2013 Bloomberg Finance L.P. All rights reserved. For terms of service see bloomberglaw.com // PAGE 1 Document Link: http://www.bloomberglaw.com/ms/document/X1Q6M18OSAO2? documentName=956.pdf&fmt=pdf

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful