15 views

Uploaded by jackychen101

save

- Week8.pdf
- SuLiz
- barrios ramirez 3daylesson 1
- Log_web
- Algebra Cat
- Maths Em
- practice_book_math.pdf
- 1948257
- Aquaculture Planning Workshop
- Scientific Calculator 111
- 7-3 Laws of Logarithms
- DefiningLn
- 1%2E4812069
- Third Test
- Chap 05 Solns-6E.doc
- Additional Mathematics Project Work 2
- Fuzzy Finite element method
- Transformations of Variables
- bland altman measuring comparison studies
- Números de Bernoulli
- SQL PLSQL Material Ramanjanayalu
- Zeta Function Regularization
- exponential and logarithmic functions
- Mater
- 0005185
- Derivation of Shilding Formulas for X and Gamma Rays
- SPE-102730-PA
- Science-Sp Notes for May 11 Program for Pravir (Autosaved)(1)
- USPBacterialEndotoxinsTest
- Mastriani
- 微波工程導論 HW1
- PEexp11 Solar Cell
- 1-40
- 微波工程導論 HW3
- 97BET-公告
- Syllabus
- 微波工程導論 HW2
- m 10102148
- PEexp07_optocoupler
- 微波工程導論 HW4
- PEexp08 Dc Inductor
- PEexp09 Buck
- PEexp06 Pwm Ic
- PEexp12_flyback
- PEexp10 Boost
- OD_HW#1_03122012
- PEexp01 Comp I
- Polar Iza
- Fabry Perot Resonator
- OD GroupPhaseVelocity1
- Fabry Perot
- PEexp02 Comp II
- Vector Wave Equation
- PEexp04 Voltage Reg
- OD_HW#4_05142012
- confocal_resonator5
- PEexp05 Hall Sensor
- OD_HW#5_05282012
- Kasap_Example2.2.1
- PEexp03_voltage ref.pdf

You are on page 1of 5

You are not responsible for the mathematics presented here, but you should know what the terms Weber’s law and Fechner’s law refer to. Discrimination Thresholds Weber’s law expresses a general relationship between a quantity or intensity of something and how much more needs to be added for us to be able to tell that something has been added. Experiments designed to find out such things are called discrimination threshold experiments, because the observer is asked to tell apart, or discriminate, two things that differ by only a slight increment. The discrimination threshold, then, is the smallest detectable increment above whatever the initial intensity was. You might imagine that this increment is not the same for the entire range of initial intensities that are possible— generally speaking, you’re right. The smallest detectable increment typically changes depending on what the starting intensity is. For instance, if we are trying to discriminate which of two flashes of light lasts longer, we may be able to tell the difference between a short flash and a slightly longer one. But if the same slight difference in duration is added to a very long flash, we are less able to tell the difference between the slightly-longer long flash from the long flash by itself. Similarly, for a particular combination of target and masker sounds, our ability to detect a tone in the presence of a masker depends on how intense the masker is. If the masker is not very intense, we don’t have to increase the intensity of the tone very much to be able to detect it. If the masker is more intense, the same small increase in intensity will not make the tone audible anymore. We won’t be able to detect it unless we make it considerably more intense. Weber’s law This general relationship between the initial intensity of something and the smallest detectable increment is exactly what Weber noticed and formalized into “Weber’s Law”. The discrimination threshold, or the threshold for detecting an increment in the quantity or intensity of something, changes depending on how much there is before we add the increment. Weber’s law is a hypothesis about how this threshold change happens. Let’s call the initial intensity (the intensity before adding the increment) I, and let’s call the amount needed to detect a difference ∆I. (Often, the specific letter that researchers choose bears some relation to the stimulus dimension being discriminated—if we are interested in duration discrimination, we might have D and ∆D.) In a discrimination experiment, then, we are interested in measuring ∆I as a function of I. That is, we want to find the discrimination threshold ∆I such that a stimulus with an intensity I+∆I is just discriminable from a stimulus of intensity I. Weber’s law characterizes how the ∆I we measure depends on I. It states that

∆I = K w I

for some constant Kw. The constant Kw is called the Weber Fraction. You may notice the similarity between this equation and the equation for a straight line, y = m * x + b. Weber’s law expresses the equation for a straight line, with the slope m being the Weber Fraction, Kw and the y-intercept b being zero. Likewise, I plays the part of x and ∆I plays the part of y. Thus, if Weber’s law holds, we expect the data to graph as a straight line through the origin, as shown in Figure 1.

Thus. the fraction ∆I/I is a constant (Kw. The second one requires you to convert the discrimination thresholds and the base intensity into logarithms: ∆I = Kw .05 0. This formula is useful when I can take on a large range of values. In Figure 2 above. Another way of saying this is that no matter what intensity I we present to the observer. Thus. the Weber Fraction) which does not change for different values of I.15 30 Log (²I) 0 200 400 600 800 1000 ²I 0.Psychology 0044 Weber’s Law Page 2 Figure 1 50 0. this relation holds true for many . Why Weber’s law is useful As we have already seen. we should measure a discrimination threshold ∆I that always results in the same number when we divide it by I. If Weber’s law holds. log( ∆I ) = log( I ) + log( K w ) .2 Figure 2 0. You can see that the data still fall along a straight line.25 40 0.8 1 1.4 1. I In this formulation of Weber’s law. if Weber’s law holds.8 Intensity (I) Log (I) Other ways of expressing Weber’s law There are other ways of expressing Weber’s law which might allow a more convenient visual analysis of whether or not Weber’s law holds for a set of data. The first one described below requires you to divide the measured difference thresholds ∆I by the intensity I. log(∆I) should plot as a straight-line function of log(I).2 1.6 1.05 10 0 0 -0.1 20 0. the data plotted in Figure 1 were transformed to logs and replotted. with slope 1 and intercept Kw. if ∆I/I is plotted on the y-axis and I is plotted on the x-axis. Weber’s law is a useful way to summarize the relation between the discrimination threshold ∆I and the base intensity I. In general. you should see a horizontal straight line with intercept Kw if Weber’s law holds.

the difference threshold ∆I is more influenced by the absolute threshold (which is approximately constant. Weber’s law starts to break down. Suppose we call the change in response necessary for discrimination “one”. The discrimination threshold ∆I is given by the distance on the x-axis between I and I+∆I. If it does. Then by Fechner’s law the two intensities indicated by arrows will be just discriminable. The second part is that the visual response R to an intensity I is given by the equation R = log( I ). When performing discrimination threshold experiments.Psychology 0044 Weber’s Law Page 3 different physical dimensions (but not always—see below). This means that when I takes on values near threshold. How general is Weber’s law? You may have already suspected that Weber’s law might not hold for absolutely all values of I. You can see that when I is large. the difference threshold ∆I approaches Kw * I. If we know that Weber’s law holds for two dimensions. we can predict what the discrimination threshold should be—it’s just the Weber fraction times the base intensity. Fechner’s law Fechner’s law provides an explanation for Weber’s law. This relation is plotted in the next graph. we can compare our sensitivity to changes along those dimensions by comparing the Weber fractions. ∆I approaches Kw * Io. you can probably see that if we know Weber’s law holds and we know what the Weber fraction is. The Weber fraction is often expressed as a percentage. Kw Io is the absolute threshold—the smallest intensity of a given physical dimension we can reliably detect. The first part is that two stimuli will be discriminable if they generate a visual response that exceeds some threshold. however. A Weber fraction of 1% indicates a fairly high sensitivity to increments. By now. while a Weber fraction of 15% is rather poor and indicates lower sensitivity to increments. Here is a generalized formulation of Weber’s law that can accommodate the most common deviation from the simple form of the law: ∆I = K w ( I + I 0 ). we then want to find out what the Weber fraction is. ignoring a bit of noise) than it is by the changing value of I. it’s often the case that for very small values of I. . the first analysis is often aimed at finding out whether or not Weber’s law holds for that set of discriminations. In fact. which is the usual formulation for Weber’s law. Fechner’s explanation has two parts. When I is near threshold.

Now subtract I from both sides: KI − I = ∆I . Using the rules for logarithms. we can re-write this as ∆R = log ( ( I + ∆I ) / I ) . Mathematical relation between Fechner’s law and Weber’s law (You are not responsible for this math. Let us call this amount ∆R. which predicts that the discrimination threshold grows as we increase the base intensity I. we can re-write our equation as K = ( I + ∆I ) / I . So Fechner’s law says that when ∆I represents discrimination threshold.Psychology 0044 Weber’s Law Page 4 If you use Fechner’s law and the graph to find the discrimination threshold for a stimulus more intense than the I shown. .) Fechner’s law predicts that two lights will be just discriminable if the responses they generate differ by a constant amount. Now multiply both sides by I: KI = I + ∆I . you will you will discover that the discrimination threshold is larger. Now raise the constant e to both sides of this equation: e ∆R = elog ( ( I +∆I ) / I ) . This is consistent with Weber’s law. Since elog( x ) = x for any x (by the definition of a logarithm). Now regroup the terms on the left: ( K − 1) I = ∆I . ∆R = log( I + ∆I ) − log( I ). we can simply define a new constant K = e ∆R . Since ∆R is a constant. I provide it for the curious.

. then we can predict Weber’s law.Psychology 0044 Weber’s Law Page 5 Now define K w = K − 1 = e ∆R − 1. Then we have Weber’s law: ∆I = K w I . stop by during office hours and we can chat about the relation in more detail. for some constant Kw.) The visual response that plays a role in Fechner’s law is closely related to the perceptual response that played a role in our discussion of the theory of signal detection. if you are curious please come ask me to tell you more. If you are curious. Final notes for the brave of heart (You are not responsible for this next paragraph. (And we have even shown how Kw depends on ∆R. I also note that there are conditions under which Weber’s law does not hold. Again.) The result of this math is that if Fechner’s law holds.

- Week8.pdfUploaded byosmanfırat
- SuLizUploaded bysfofoby
- barrios ramirez 3daylesson 1Uploaded byapi-246444495
- Log_webUploaded bykee4292
- Algebra CatUploaded byAmlandeep Nandi
- Maths EmUploaded byRaju Raju
- practice_book_math.pdfUploaded byAustin Fritzke
- 1948257Uploaded bySara Salehi
- Aquaculture Planning WorkshopUploaded byapi-3748765
- Scientific Calculator 111Uploaded byRitesh Ratnesh
- 7-3 Laws of LogarithmsUploaded byjsarmientodc
- DefiningLnUploaded bycyspace
- 1%2E4812069Uploaded byمهندس حامد
- Third TestUploaded byAnthony Miguel Rafanan
- Chap 05 Solns-6E.docUploaded bySaby Hellen Florecin
- Additional Mathematics Project Work 2Uploaded byAshrul Aizam Apendi
- Fuzzy Finite element methodUploaded byamitu2bmine
- Transformations of VariablesUploaded byFranco Imperial
- bland altman measuring comparison studiesUploaded byirdinamarchsya
- Números de BernoulliUploaded byRodrigo Díaz Gambini
- SQL PLSQL Material RamanjanayaluUploaded bypradeep.bojanala6973
- Zeta Function RegularizationUploaded bynicolasrobles
- exponential and logarithmic functionsUploaded byapi-240329960
- MaterUploaded byDavid Turner
- 0005185Uploaded byHafijur Rahman
- Derivation of Shilding Formulas for X and Gamma RaysUploaded byM J Rhoades
- SPE-102730-PAUploaded byDiego Amador
- Science-Sp Notes for May 11 Program for Pravir (Autosaved)(1)Uploaded byVenkataraman Ramachandran
- USPBacterialEndotoxinsTestUploaded byAq Ifah
- MastrianiUploaded byKiran Kharade

- 微波工程導論 HW1Uploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp11 Solar CellUploaded byjackychen101
- 1-40Uploaded byjackychen101
- 微波工程導論 HW3Uploaded byjackychen101
- 97BET-公告Uploaded byjackychen101
- SyllabusUploaded byjackychen101
- 微波工程導論 HW2Uploaded byjackychen101
- m 10102148Uploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp07_optocouplerUploaded byjackychen101
- 微波工程導論 HW4Uploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp08 Dc InductorUploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp09 BuckUploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp06 Pwm IcUploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp12_flybackUploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp10 BoostUploaded byjackychen101
- OD_HW#1_03122012Uploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp01 Comp IUploaded byjackychen101
- Polar IzaUploaded byjackychen101
- Fabry Perot ResonatorUploaded byjackychen101
- OD GroupPhaseVelocity1Uploaded byjackychen101
- Fabry PerotUploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp02 Comp IIUploaded byjackychen101
- Vector Wave EquationUploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp04 Voltage RegUploaded byjackychen101
- OD_HW#4_05142012Uploaded byjackychen101
- confocal_resonator5Uploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp05 Hall SensorUploaded byjackychen101
- OD_HW#5_05282012Uploaded byjackychen101
- Kasap_Example2.2.1Uploaded byjackychen101
- PEexp03_voltage ref.pdfUploaded byjackychen101