Obama a US Citizen? Never, no way! You are ABSOLUTELY wrong, 100% if you think Obama is an American! Sen.

Lyman Trumbull, a key figure in the adoption of the 14th Amendment, said that “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. included not owing allegiance to any other country.

It is just plain wrong to claim that the children born of parents temporarily in the country as students or tourists are automatically U.S. citizens: They do not meet the 14th Amendment’s jurisdictional allegiance obligations. They are, in fact, subject to the political jurisdiction (and allegiance) of the country of their parents. Obama, by definition of the LAWS and STATUTES of the State of Virginia is an ALIEN: <http://archive.org/stream/acompleteencycl00hursgoog#page/n79/mode/2up > (See Page 69, Alien, and, Page 330-332, Citizen, etc., A Complete Encyclopedia of Virginia Law. Published by Samuel Need Hurst) I contend that in order for a person to be a natural-born citizen within the meaning of Article II, Section 1, it is necessary that BOTH parents be U.S. citizens at the time of that person's birth. Those who subscribe to this theory argue that since Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen, Obama could not have been a natural-born citizen, and is therefore ineligible to be President of the United States. The Liberty Legal Foundation has cited language in an 1875 voting rights case—Minor v. Happersett—in support of its claim that the U.S. Supreme Court has defined natural-born citizens as "all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens". <http://libertylegalfoundation.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/10/Federal-DNC-Complaint.pdf> Regardless of Libertylegalfoundation.org the Congressional Record clearly states that 14th Amendment citizenship is dependent upon BOTH parents being subject to the jurisdiction of the US and BOTH parents being US Citizens! The legal theory behind this qualifier or condition precedent for American (14th Amendment Declaratory) Citizenship is that the child upon reaching majority cannot be forced to decide between the citizenship of one parent or the citizenship of the other parent to the destruction of the family unit (viz DIVORCE) and that the child upon reaching majority cannot have divided political loyalties or allegiances! Irregardless of all of the above, at the time that Obama was (allegedly, as I'm still not convinced) born in the State of Hawaii the law was clearly set forth as below - That being said, Obama is not an American: International Law, Cases and Materials, 2nd Ed., Bishop. Little Brown and Co. 1962, pp. 415-416 et. seq. (the rule of International Law is that the son takes on the nationality of the father.) I also contend the 14th Citizenship Amendment was never constitutionally ratified. I know this to be true because I was told this in Court by a Judge and can obtain the transcripts. Either way one looks at it, Obama can never constitutionally be an American! Just a case in point, why did we need the 14th citizenship amendment when the Civil Rights Act of 1866 already affirmed equal citizenship to former slaves and their children? Because the 14th Amendment was never ratified and has been foisted upon the US to cover up the intrigues of the British during the War of 1812 when the Library of Congress was burned and the majority of the records pertaining to the real 13th "Titles of Nobility" Amendment that passed in 1811 (which provided pains and penalties of loss of American Citizenship for accepting foreign titles of nobility, graft, corruption and the like) were destroyed! The actual 14th Amendment is the current 13th which conditionally prohibits slavery! The Congressional Record on the Titles of Nobility Amendment are on line for anyone to research.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful