## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Fluke PM 6681 Timer / Counter / Analyzer

Accurate phase calibration Application Note

The PM 6681 Timer/Counter Analyzer is a multifunction instrument that is ideal for calibrating a wide variety of time and frequency related parameters - including frequency, period and time intervals, and phase. The very high single-shot resolution of 50 ps (1 ps averaged) combined with a wide variety of time base options including a super highstability atomic rubidium timebase oscillator. Together, these provide fast calibration of time and frequency parameters channel B, and the following with very high accuracy, both conditions should be considered in the field and in the for maximum accuracy. calibration lab. a) Perform internal hysteresis calibration before making the The built-in statistics functions simplify calibration by instantly (single-key) phase calibration b) Combine single-shot calculating the mean value, measurements with statistical standard deviation and maxcalculation of the mean value to min peaks over any selected improve resolution. sample size up to 4 billion c) Use DC- instead of AC-coupling samples. The TimeView™ PC for frequencies below 500 Hz to analysis software enables eliminate phase errors caused by visual feedback and tolerances in AC coupling documentation of the components. measurement process. d) The optimum input voltage Measurement vs. time graphs, smoothing (digital filtering) and range for highest accuracy is between 0.3 and 3 Vrms (3 and distribution histograms are all 30 Vrms with 10× input possible. attenuation). Higher input voltages than 30 Vrms need external Phase calibration The PM 6681 can calibrate phases attenuation; lower input voltages very accurately, particularly when than 0.3 Vrms lead to increased uncertainty. the procedures on the next page e) Use two external matched loware followed. Several factors may pass filters for signals that may influence the uncertainty when contain noise. calibrating the phase angle between signals on channel A and f) Externally swap the start and

stop signals and take the average value of these measurements to reduce the uncertainty caused by trigger level offsets and inequality of external filters. Calibration procedure for Phase calibrating a generator Before calibrating, be sure that both generator and PM 6681 are in a controlled climatic environment, and that both instruments are warmed up according to the manufacturers’ specifications. A. Set up the PM 6681 Timer/Counter/Analyzer 1. Select function PHASE A-B 2. Set input channels A and B to: DC coupling (for freq. < 500 Hz) 1 MΩ input termination Positive Slope Trigger level 0 V AUTO trigger Off 3. Select MEASUREMENT – SINGLE: on

10W channels in the same order of magnitude. For minimum uncertainty.® 4.3 Ω. D. E. See Figure 1.5W 2A 0. Disconnect any signal cables from the A and B input channels on the PM 6681 2. a shunt resistor with suitable resistance and power rating. select CAL HYST and press ENTER. This procedure will compensate for systematic uncertainties due to trigger level errors. Select STAT – ON – MEAN – 100 samples to reduce jitter and improve resolution B. Figure 2 Figure 1 calibrator as an example. calculate the average value of the results ϕ1-2 and 360°-ϕ2-1. If the output signals contain HFnoise and spurious signals. Reconnect signal cables. resulting in the mean value ϕ1-2. 10W 5A 0. 3. Press button AUX MENU. 3. Connect the Generator to be calibrated Connect the two phase-shifted outputs from the generator to Channel A and B of the PM 6681. Set-up for Voltage to Current Phase measurements Some generators produce a phase shift between a voltage output and a separate current output. C. The current output of the generator must therefore be converted to a voltage using. Set MEASUREMENT – TIME – 100 µs to speed up the readings 5. Next connect signal 1 to input B and signal 2 to input A. 1. Make an internal hysteresis calibration 1. keep input levels for both input . 0.5° require two series of measurements: first with normal connections and then with the input signals swapped. in which case LP-filters are recommended. Procedure for high-accuracy measurements Uncertainty levels below 0. and requires two input voltage signals.3 Ω. which shows a Fluke 5500A Example suitable for the Fluke 5500 Calibrator: Aux output: Shunt resistor Ri: 300 mA 3 Ω. signal frequency) to reduce any trigger error caused by noise from the generator. as shown in Figure 2 below. for example. First connect signal 1 to input A and signal 2 to input B. Finally. 2. Note: Do not use the internal SWAP A-B button. use two identical LP-filters (3 dB bandwidth at least 25 times above max. The PM 6681 has no current input. giving ϕ2-1.

multiply uc by 2 to get the total uncertainty (U). For small values of ∆UA the signal slew rate is approx. If all factors are uncorrelated. UB = 1 Vrms. is A / √3 for a rectangular distribution. To obtain higher confidence level (‘2 σ’). Stop trigger point uncertainty due to noise: General 1. BIPM) 3. Combined uncertainty uT for period: (This is reduced to 8 x 10-6 after statistical averaging with 100 samples.value) 2. Start trigger point uncertainty due to noise: The combined uncertainty of the phase is called uΦ and the standard uncertainties in the period and time interval measurements are called uT and uTI respectively. The standard deviation of a systematic uncertainty given as limit values ±A. For a sine-wave signal . equal to the slew rate at the zero crossing. frequency = 1 kHz and UA = 2 Vrms. Resolution (single-shot): u1 = 50 ps (rms . Start trigger point uncertainty due to noise: Combined random uncertainty uTI(R) for time interval: (reduced to 12 ns after statistical averaging with 100 samples. express Combined Uncertainty (uc) as the root of the sum of the squares.® Appendix Uncertainty calculations according to recommendation INC-1 (ISO. For a sine-wave signal . 4. The relative uncertainty of the measurement can be expressed as: For small values of ∆UA the signal slew rate is about equal to the slew rate at the zero crossing. Phase measurements The phase (A-B) between the input signals that are connected to inputs A and B is measured in two consecutive measurements: . Stop trigger point uncertainty due to noise: Example Phase between zero crossings of two sine-wave signals with Signal/Noise-ratio (SNR) = 60 dB. 3. the slew rate (du) dt equals 3. A – The uncertainty of the period measurement Random uncertainty factors 1.Period (T) of signal on input A . which is completely negligible.) B – The uncertainty of the time interval measurement Random uncertainty factors: 1. which is totally negligible). Identify all contributing uncertainty factors 2.value) 2. Express the influence of all factors (whether random or systematic) on the measured value as one standard deviation. the slew rate (du) equals dt . Resolution (single-shot): u1=50 ps (rms .Time interval (TI) from set trigger levels (normally zero crossings) of input A to input B The phase is then calculated as: 4.

uncertainties well below 0.® Systematic uncertainty factors: 4.L.009° uncertainty) Combined systematic uncertainty for time interval meas. This means that the correlation coefficient ρ=1. the overall dominant source for uncertainty is the systematic uncertainty of the time interval measurement. Setting Error) C – Reducing the systematic uncertainty by swapping the inputs As found in the previous calculations. the period can be regarded as constant and invariable and all uncertainty is associated with the time interval measurement.Φ1. Channel asymmetry uncertainty (500 ps ) u6=500 ps (limit value) Combined systematic uncertainty uTI(S) for time interval: Figure 3 above shows the input signals with amplitudes U1 and U2 respectively with a fixed phase relation of Φ1 (U2 -U1). where the result is obtained from two consecutive measurements with the signal swapped in the second measurement. first measure and obtain the reading ϕ1 (U2 -U1). the uncertainty in the 0 V trigger level setting ∆UA is 2. the actual trigger levels have some offset associated with each input channel. equal to the slew rate at the zero crossing. Setting Error) t Figure 3 6. due to a small zero-level offset: Combined uncertainty for period measurement: 8 ns (rms) (⇒ 0. A two-step procedure.5 mV or less.13° uncertainty) For a given phase measurement. For small values of ∆UA the signal slew rate is approx.003° uncertainty) Combined random uncertainty for time interval meas. We have ignored all other uncertainties except those due to systematic trigger level offsets.: 12 ns (rms) (⇒ 0. ∆UA and ∆UB (V) causing a systematic difference between Φ1 and ϕ1 and Φ2 and ϕ2 respectively. Finally. The timing uncertainties in the trigger points (1…4) caused by the trigger level uncertainties can be expressed as follows: After a hysteresis calibration. We have also assumed that these offsets (∆UA and ∆UB) were fixed and stable for the PM 6681 during the complete measurement sequence. The actual measured values are ϕ1 between trigger point 1 and 3 for Φ1 and ϕ2 between trigger points 2 and 4 for Φ2. For a sine-wave signal . The influence of the systematic trigger level setting uncertainty can be significantly reduced if the measurement is made in two steps. We have identical systematic uncertainty uϕ in both measurements ϕ1 and ϕ2. Thus ∆Φ can be expressed as: This leads to a total uncertainty U (2 σ) in this example of: .: 180 ns (rms) (⇒ 0. As illustrated (greatly exaggerated). and thereafter ϕ2 (U1.U2).U2) (the “true” values). and Φ2 (U1. calculate the average value as described previously. According to uncertainty calculation theory. Stop trigger point uncertainty due to trigger level offset (T. will significantly improve the uncertainty. the slew rate (du) dt equals 5. where Φ2 = 360° . the combined uncertainty of the expression (Can NOT be reduced by statistical averaging) Total uncertainty (2σ) The analysis above shows that when making a phase A-B measurement and averaging the result (N = 100).1° are difficult to reach without special precautions.L. Start trigger point uncertainty due to trigger level offset (T. The trigger level was set to 0 V and a hysteresis calibration made.

WA 98206 Fluke Europe B. Everett.com ©Copyright 1998 Fluke Corporation. the relation between the ‘true’ phase. P. we recommend making a complete uncertainty calculation. and systematic channel delay mismatch).® is then . 5602 BD Eindhoven.: (800) 443-5853 or Fax: (425) 356-5116 In Europe/M-East: +31 (0)40 2 678 200 or Fax: +31 (0)40 2 678 222 In Canada: (905) 890-7600 or Fax: (905) 890-6866 From other countries: +1(425) 356-5500 or Fax: +1 (425) 356-5116 Web access: http://www.O.and not as would be the case with uncorrelated variables (ρ=0).S. the measured phase and its residual error is: This leads to: Although the trigger level setting is the major source of (systematic) uncertainty. also based on other sources of uncertainty (like random variations due to the SNR and resolution. Please remember that uncertainties caused by external and internal noise can be reduced by statistical averaging to a level far below the uncertainty caused by the trigger level offset. .A. The Netherlands For more information call: In the U. All rights reserved. With reference to Figure 3. Box 9090. Box 1186.V.fluke.O. Fluke Corporation P. See the Operator’s Manual for the PM 6681.

- Calculating Measurement Uncertainty for Mobile Phones
- ctia-test-plan-for-mobile-station-over-the-air-performance-revision-3-1.pdf
- Determining the uncertainty associated with an integrated quantity calculated from correlated spectral data
- Abstract
- fisika
- Met Tam 1992
- 04_UncertaintyI.pdf
- dkd_5_e
- Detailed Learning Objectives Fundamentals Apr2013
- Proceedings of the First International Conference on Neutrosophics, UNM-G, ed. F.Smarandache
- PLN08 BO3 Hubbard How to Measure Anything
- Smart Decisions eBook 2.3.10
- TOK Essay 2
- Crystal v1
- Guidance for the A2 Practical Assessment
- Making Better Decisions Makers
- Introduction VoIP
- EHCO 9 Brochure
- Decision+Making
- Living with Uncertainty
- 1930.pdf
- B 244-09 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Thickness of Anodic Coatings on Aluminum and of Other Nonconductive Coatings on Nonmagnetic Basis Metals With Eddy-Current Instruments
- 81W 27244 0 Calbration
- Cognitive Radios Close to Major Advance
- Ambiguity and Coordination in a Global Game Model of Financial Crises
- Sea Trials and Monitoring
- Fundamentals of Test Measurement Instrumentation
- 204189241 Guide for the Validation ISO 11095
- South Sudan - Immunization_2015
- 212 Dcct Flyer

- Fiscal Uncertainty and Economic Activity
- Decentralized Cooperation and the Future of Regulatory Reform (PGSE 1.1) Pepper Culpepper.
- Apollo Navigation Ground and Onboard Capabilities
- frbsf_let_19950203.pdf
- Self-Defense and the Limits of WMD Intelligence, by Matthew C. Waxman
- Fs Paper28
- Risk Management in Different Construction Phases
- tmpD252.tmp
- As 3778.2.4-2007 Measurement of Water Flow in Open Channels General - Estimation of Uncertainty of a Flow Rat
- Unification Of Randomized Anomaly In Deception Detection Using Fuzzy Logic Under Uncertainty
- tmp955C.tmp
- tmp83ED.tmp
- tmp439
- tmp2228.tmp
- FOMC20100428SEPmaterial.pdf
- Responsive Documents - CREW v. CEQ
- Reforming Regulatory Analysis, Review, and Oversight
- tmpE477.tmp
- The Economic Costs of Tax Policy Uncertainty
- Speech Given by Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England 6.30.16
- CREW
- ifdp1093
- Fomc 20081029 Sep Material
- FOMC20100623SEPcompilation.pdf
- WFC Holdings Corp. v. United States
- maisel_19700914.pdf
- wp1405
- HOUSE HEARING, 112TH CONGRESS - IS UNCERTAINTY CONTRIBUTING TO THE JOBS CRISIS
- econcomm_19920115.pdf
- Uncertainty about Federal Reserve Policy and Its Transmission to Emerging Economies

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading