Nevada

Districts and schools
Number of districts
(CCD)

http://www.nde.state.nv.us
Students
2003-04
17 17

Staff
1993-94
Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) 1,179 173,083 60,878 233,961

1993-94

Public school enrollment (CCD)

2003-04
2,778 277,383 104,650 382,033

Number of FTE 1993-94 teachers (CCD) Elementary 6,992
Middle High Combined Other Total Instructional aides Instructional coordinators Administrators Other Total 2,113 2,764 111 174 12,154 1,257 87 919 7,576 9,839

2003-04
11,707 4,460 5,168 271 202 21,808 2,438 524 1,342 9,521 13,825

Number of public schools

(CCD)

261 57 71 8 7 404 334 86 99 21 5 545 14

Elementary Middle High Combined Other Total

Race/ethnicity (CCD)
American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Students with disabilities (OSEP) 2% 4 9 14 70 10% 6% 2% 7 11 30 51 10% 15%

Number of FTE non-teacher staff (CCD)

Number of charter schools (CCD)

Finances
Total current expenditures 1993-94
(CCD, in thousands of dollars, adjusted for inflation to 2002-03) $834,595 Instructional 47,633 Noninstructional 518,990 Support Total 1,401,218

2002-03
$1,408,570 73,834 768,641 2,251,045

Students with limited English proficiency (NCELA) Migrant students
(OME)

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000
English Mathematics Science Social studies 85% 74 88 86 70% 38 78 73

1%

*

Percentage of core courses taught by highly qualified teachers, 2003-04 (As defined and reported by states, collected by ED)

Per-pupil expenditures
(CCD, adjusted for inflation to 2002-03)

$5,943

$6,092

Eighth-grade students enrolled in 1996 - Algebra I for high school credit
(NAEP)

2003

32%

All schools High-poverty schools Low-poverty schools

64% 59% 75%
2000-01
5% 70 40

Sources of funding
(CCD, 2002-03)

Federal 7%

Local 63%

Students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced129,774 Price Lunch Program, 2003-04 (CCD) Number of schools, by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free or Reduced-Price Lunch Program, ^ 2003-04 (CCD)

Outcomes

State 30%

1993-94 High school dropout rate (NCES) 10% Avg. freshman graduation rate (NCES) 73 38 College-going rate (IPEDS/NCES) NAEP state results (NCES)
Reading, Grade 4 Proficient level or above Basic level or above Math, Grade 8 Proficient level or above Basic level or above

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 81 99
60

200

1994
- -

2005
21% 52

Title I allocation 2002-03
(ED; Includes Title I, Part A)

$53,216,311

75-100%
^

1996
- -

2005
21% 60

KEY:

70

K

— n/a # FTE

*

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = Full Time Equivalent

105 schools did not report.

Nevada
Statewide Accountability Information
See Appendix B for Nevada’s definitions of proficient for reading and mathematics for grades 3, 8, and high school. See http://www.nevadareportcard.com/ for more details on the statewide accountability system. State assessment for NCLB accountability: Nevada Criterion Reference Tests State student achievement levels: Approaches Standard, Developing/Emergent, Meets Standard, Exceeds Standard

St udent Achievement 2003-04
Nevada Criterion Reference Tests, used for NCLB accountability Reading Proficient level or above for: Grade 3 Grade 8 High school
All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic 45% 29 12 19 14 31 26 59 50% 32 22 11 9 30 30 64 77% 64 38 35 37 66 62 86

NCLB Accountability Goals
2001-02 Annual measurable objective starting point
Grade 3 Reading Mathematics Grade 8 Reading Mathematics High school eading R Mathematics 32.4% 37.3 37 38 91 58

Target (2003-04)
27.5% 34.5 37 32 73.5 42.8

Student achievement trend: Reading percent proficient level or above
100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Grade 3 n/a Grade 8 High School
45% 32 26 22 22 27 32 57

81 77 51 51 45 56 50 55

2004 2003 2002

2003-04 NCLB accountability results, applied to 2004-05 school year
AYP outcomes and consequences
Made AYP Identified for improvement: Year 1 Year 2 Corrective action Restructuring Exited Improvement status (made AYP twice after being identified for improvement)

Title I schools
70 (59%) 31 (26%) 16 (13%) 2 (2%) 0 0

All schools
357 (63%) 57 (10%) 81 (14%) 2 (*) 0 0

All districts
8 (47%) 6 (35%) 3 (18%) 0 0 0

Mathematics Proficient level or above for: Grade 3
All students Economically disadvantaged students Migrant students Students with disabilities Students with limited English proficiency Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic students White, non-Hispanic

Grade 8
48% 32 29 9 14 27 31 61

High school
58% 41 19 14 24 36 39 69

Other indicator, 2003-04
Elementary indicator: Attendance Middle school indicator: Attendance High school indicator: Graduation rate

State target

State outcome
Met Met Met

Meet or progress toward 90% Meet or progress toward 90% Meet or progress toward 50% 252 259 1% 10%

Student achievement trend: Mathematics percent proficient level or above 100% 2004
75% 50% 25% 0% Grade 3 n/a n/a Grade 8 High School 50 51 45 48 39 55 58 2003 2002

NCLB choice participation
Title I school choice: Supplemental educational services:

Number of Title I students Percent of eligible students

71