2.8K views

Original Title: Air Pollution Dispersion Modeling

Uploaded by Milton Beychok

- Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID)
- Gaussian Plume Model
- Good Practice for Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling
- Air Pollution Modelling
- 5 Toxic Release Dispersion Models
- Mechanical Design Project for Fluidized Bed Reactor
- Air Pollution
- Clean Air Act and Chimneys
- Flue Gas Dispersion Model Study
- Modelling Air Pollution Due to Road Traffic
- Air Pollution Dispersion Modeling Terminology
- Mathematics of Dispersion Modeling
- Dispersion Modelling Quetta
- MENG Thesis-A deterministic model for predicting air pollution concentration
- Atmospherical.modelling
- Plume Behaviour
- Distillation Column Design
- Mass and Energy Balance
- Air Pollution and Dispersion Models
- jinesh

You are on page 1of 6

mathematical simulation of how air pollutants disperse

in the ambient atmosphere. It is per-formed with

computer programs, called dispersion models, that solve

the mathematical equations and algorithms which

simulate the pollutant dispersion. The dispersion models

are used to estimate or to predict the downwind

concentration of air pollutants emitted from emission

sources such as industrial plants and vehicular traffic.

Such models are important to governmental agencies

tasked with protecting and managing ambient air

quality. The models are typically employed to determine

whether exist-ing or proposed new industrial facilities

are or will be in compliance with the National Ambient

Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the United States and

similar standards in other nations. The models also serve to assist in the design of

effective control strategies to reduce emissions of harmful air pollutants.

• Meteorological data such as wind speed and direction, atmospheric

turbulence (characterized by what is known as the stability class), the

ambient air temperature and the height to the bottom of any temperature

inversion that may be present aloft.

• Emissions parameters such as source location and height, source vent stack

diameter and exit velocity, exit temperature and mass flow rate.

• Terrain elevations at the source location and at the receptor location.

• The location, height and width of any obstructions (such as buildings or other

structures) in the path of the gaseous emission plume.

modules for the input of meteorological and other data, and many also include a

post-processor module for graphing the output data and/or plotting the area

impacted by the air pollutants on maps. Currently, the AERMOD air pollution

dispersion model is the preferred regulatory model of the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency.

The air pollution dispersion models are also known as atmospheric dispersion

models, atmospheric diffusion models, air dispersion models and air quality models.

The technical literature on air pollution dispersion is quite extensive and dates back

to the 1930's and earlier. One of the early air pollutant plume dispersion equations

was derived by Bosanquet and Pearson.[1] Their equation did not assume Gaussian

distribution nor did it include the effect of ground reflection of the pollutant plume.

Sir Graham Sutton derived an air pollutant plume dispersion equation in 1947[2]

which did include the assumption of Gaussian distribution for the vertical and

crosswind dispersion of the plume and also included the effect of ground reflection

of the plume.

There was an immense growth in the utilization of air pollutant plume dispersion

calculations between the late 1960s and today. Since personal computers also came

into existence during that period, a great many computer programs for calculating

the dispersion of air pollutant emissions were developed in that same period. The

basis for most of those models was the Complete Equation For Gaussian

Dispersion Modeling Of Continuous, Buoyant Air Pollution Plumes shown

below:[3][4]

The above equation includes upward reflection of the pollution plume from the

ground, as well as downward reflection from the bottom of any temperature

inversion lid present in the atmosphere.

The sum of the four exponential terms in g3 converges to a final value quite rapidly.

For most cases, the summation of the series with m = 1, m = 2 and m = 3 will

provide an adequate solution.

It should be noted that σ z and σ y are functions of the atmospheric stability class

(i.e., a measure of the turbulence in the ambient atmosphere) and of the downwind

distance to the receptor. The two most important variables affecting the degree of

pollutant emission dispersion obtained are the height of the emission source point

and the degree of atmospheric turbulence. The more turbulence, the better the

degree of dispersion.

The resulting calculations for air pollutant concentrations are often expressed as an

air pollutant concentration contour map in order to show the spatial variation in

pollutant levels over a wide area under study. In this way the contour lines can

overlay sensitive receptor locations and reveal the spatial relationship of air

pollutants to areas of interest.

The Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation (discussed above) requires the input

of H (also known as the effective plume height, He ) which is the pollutant plume's

centerline height above ground level. He at any distance from the pollutant plume's

source is the sum of Hs (the actual physical height of the pollutant plume's source

point) plus Δ H (the plume rise due the plume's buoyancy) at that distance.

To determine Δ H, most air dispersion models developed between the late 1960s

and the early 2000s used what are known as "the Briggs equations." G.A. Briggs

first published his plume rise observations and comparisons in 1965.[5] In 1968, at a

symposium sponsored by CONCAWE (a Dutch organization), he compared many of

the plume rise models then available in the literature[6] and also wrote a section of

the publication edited by Slade[7] dealing with the comparative analyses of plume

rise models. That was followed in 1969 by his classical critique of the entire plume

rise literature,[8] in which he proposed the plume rise equations which have became

widely known as "the Briggs equations”. Subsequently Briggs modified those plume

rise equations in 1971 and in 1972.[9][10]

Briggs divided air pollution plumes into these four general categories:

• Cold jet plumes in calm ambient air conditions

• Cold jet plumes in calm ambient air conditions

• Cold jet plumes in windy ambient air conditions

• Hot, buoyant plumes in calm ambient air conditions

• Hot, buoyant plumes in windy ambient air conditions

Briggs considered the trajectory of cold jet plumes to be dominated by their initial

velocity momentum, and the trajectory of hot, buoyant plumes to be dominated by

their buoyant momentum to the extent that their initial velocity momentum was

relatively unimportant. Although he proposed plume rise equations for each of the

above plume categories, the “Briggs equations" which become widely used

are those that he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes (as depicted

in the above diagram of a plume).

In general, Briggs's equations for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes are based on

observations and data involving plumes from typical combustion sources such as

the flue gas stacks from steam-generating boilers burning fossil fuels in large power

plants. Therefore, the stack exit velocities were probably in the range of 20 to 100

ft/s (6 to 30 m/s) with exit temperatures ranging from 250 to 500 °F (120 to 260 °C).

A logic diagram for using the Briggs equations[4] to obtain the plume rise trajectory

of bent-over buoyant plumes is presented below:

where:

Δ h = plume rise, in m

F = buoyancy factor, in m4/s3

x = downwind distance from plume source, in m

= downwind distance from plume source to point of maximum plume rise,

xf

in m

u = windspeed at actual stack height, in m/s

s = stability parameter, in s-2

The parameters shown in the above logic diagram of Briggs' equations are

discussed in much more detail by Beychok.[4]

use

These are some of the major air pollution dispersion models currently being used.

There are literally dozens of other models as well:

• ADMS 3: Developed in the United Kingdom

• AERMOD: Developed in the United States

• AUSPLUME: Developed in Australia

• CALPUFF: Developed in the United States

• DISPERSION2:Developed in Sweden

• ISC3: Developed in the United States

• LADM: Developed in Australia

• NAME: Developed in the United Kingdom

• MERCURE: Developed in France

• RIMPUFF: Developed in Denmark

The European Topic Centre on Air and Climate Change, which is part of the

European Environment Agency (EEA), maintains an online Model Documentation

System (MDS)that includes descriptions and other information for almost all of the

dispersion models developed by the countries of Europe. The MDS currently

contains 104 models developed in Europe (excluding the United Kingdom).[11]

References

1. Bosanquet, C.H. and Pearson, J.L., "The spread of smoke and gases from

chimneys", Trans. Faraday Soc., 32:1249, 1936

2. Sutton, O.G., "The problem of diffusion in the lower atmosphere", QJRMS,

73:257, 1947 and "The theoretical distribution of airborne pollution from

factory chimneys", QJRMS, 73:426, 1947

3. Turner, D.B. (1994). Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates, 2nd

Edition. CRC Press. ISBN 1-56670-023-X. http://www.crcpress.com

4. Beychok, Milton R. (2005). Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion, 4th Edition.

author-published. ISBN 0-9644588-0-2. www.air-dispersion.com

5. Briggs, G.A., "A plume rise model compared with observations", JAPCA,

15:433-438, 1965

6. Briggs, G.A., "CONCAWE meeting: discussion of the comparative

consequences of different plume rise formulas", Atmos. Envir., 2:228-232,

1968

7. Slade, D.H. (Editor) (1968). Meteorology and atomic energy, Air Resources

Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Commerce.

8. Briggs, G.A., "Plume Rise", USAEC Critical Review Series, 1969

9. Briggs, G.A., "Some recent analyses of plume rise observation", Proc. Second

Internat'l. Clean Air Congress, Academic Press, New York, 1971

10. Briggs, G.A., "Discussion: chimney plumes in neutral and stable

surroundings",

Atmos. Envir., 6:507-510, 1972

11. The Model Documentation System (MDS)

- Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID)Uploaded bymohamad ashaziq
- Gaussian Plume ModelUploaded byCameron Bracken
- Good Practice for Atmospheric Dispersion ModellingUploaded byMartin Delfin
- Air Pollution ModellingUploaded byRahul Deka
- 5 Toxic Release Dispersion ModelsUploaded byKaizer Sevenfold
- Mechanical Design Project for Fluidized Bed ReactorUploaded bylily
- Air PollutionUploaded byGhaash Baba
- Clean Air Act and ChimneysUploaded byGv Reddy
- Flue Gas Dispersion Model StudyUploaded bybagusjagir
- Modelling Air Pollution Due to Road TrafficUploaded byShreedhar
- Air Pollution Dispersion Modeling TerminologyUploaded byMilton Beychok
- Mathematics of Dispersion ModelingUploaded bysscoston
- Dispersion Modelling QuettaUploaded byEnviro_Pak
- MENG Thesis-A deterministic model for predicting air pollution concentrationUploaded byBenjamin Aregbesola
- Atmospherical.modellingUploaded byAyman Elshahat
- Plume BehaviourUploaded byfaridkhan
- Distillation Column DesignUploaded byl7ani
- Mass and Energy BalanceUploaded byzubi0585
- Air Pollution and Dispersion ModelsUploaded byMarlar Shwe
- jineshUploaded bysamrat_dhar_1
- Beyond Greening Stategies for a Sustainable WorldUploaded bythao
- Global WarmingUploaded bykr_sharmamanish
- AtmosphereUploaded byjega
- Air Dispersion Modeling Conversions and FormulasUploaded byvelmurugan00000
- P&ID TutorialUploaded byzamijaka
- PID LectureUploaded bykathrin_jazz26
- 20081018-mohit-dalviUploaded byijaz fazil
- The AtmosphereUploaded byMichael Hicks

- Investigation of PhotocataliticUploaded byAdani Fajrina Luthfi
- Kitz Cast Carbon and Low Alloy Steel Gates GlobesUploaded byLupi
- IoT Smart Drainage System by Naveenkumar GanjiUploaded byraja
- CEQGchemicalsUploaded byluis norabuena
- Achieving Sustainability with Precast concrete Upload_372.pdfUploaded byLuis Ito
- Crab Shell ChitosanUploaded bySmritaPradhan P
- Bs Sponge EiaUploaded byAmarjeet Yadav
- IJRTSAT_4_1_10Uploaded bySTATPERSON PUBLISHING CORPORATION
- BiomassUploaded bymuneeb907
- 40CFR Method Update RuleUploaded byaeromerop
- Techno-Economic Assessment of W2E Conversion: Anaerobic Digestion for Solid Waste Managemenet in KMCUploaded byAnirudh Sah
- 3 Dr Tommy Lo Concrete Science on Global WarmingUploaded bydan4books
- ppmorpUploaded byBruno López
- Membrane BioreactorUploaded byKevin Alvarez
- txfaUploaded byMissy Pumpuy
- Thermal plasma technology for the treatment of wastes: A critical reviewUploaded byWeiller Rafael Galli Silva
- Steel Recycling ProcessUploaded byMOHAMEDABBAS
- W3 - Air Pollutants Emission MeasurementUploaded byevolution95
- social sciences 11.pdfUploaded byanjan_debnath
- AKN-CEPIUploaded bysiruslara6491
- lab5Uploaded byArdhito Setiawan
- sensors UV para arduinoUploaded bypak121212
- Regulating Sewage Pollution of Malaysian RiversUploaded bysulihah12
- Mine and ReclamationUploaded byInsun Wijaya
- Scat FinalUploaded bys_murugan02
- Carbon Dioxide ScrubberUploaded byGanesh.Mahendra
- Road Transport ReportUploaded byHimanshu Bansal
- PRP's for Manual GMPUploaded byShiva Kumar
- ForeFront Easthampton SPB 20170530Uploaded byMary Serreze
- The Facts on PVC & Introduction the EnvironmentUploaded byapi-26084420