Utah

School and Teacher Demographics
Per Pupil Expenditures
(CCD, 1998–1999)

http://www.usoe.k12.ut.us/
Student Demographics
Race/ethnicity
American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black
(CCD, 1999–2000)

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from States, January 2002 for 2001-2002 school year)

$4,210

1993–1994 1999–2000

Number of districts
(CCD, 1999–2000)

40

Number of public schools
Elementary Middle

Hispanic Total
(CCD, K–12)

High

Combined

White Other

467

129

153

13

788 6

6,587 1% 9,559 2% 2,913 1% 21,069 5% 429,506 92% n/a

7,502 2% 12,711 3% 4,274 1% 38,698 8% 415,725 87% n/a

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment School accreditation process, district accountability reporting Expected School Improvement on Assessment Not by state Indicators for School Accountability Assessment scores Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Meet state average at basic or higher level or increase 3 percent per year at basic or higher (Utah End of Level Tests)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 1999–2000)

Students with disabilities
(OSEP) (CCD, 1999–2000)

45,111 10% 21,364 5% 2,302
*

46,998 10% 41,306 9% n/a

Title I 1999-2000
Number of Schools Schools Meeting AYP Goal SchooIs Identified for Improvement
(ED Consolidated Report, 1999–2000)

Schoolwide Programs

Targeted Total Assistance

Number of FTE teachers
Elementary Middle

High

Combined

Total

674 11,788

222 4,947

253 5,995

153 167

13 23,425

Students with Limited English proficiency
(ED /NCBE, K–12)

Public school enrollment
(CCD)

1993–1994 1999–2000 K–8 9–12 Total Pre-K

Migratory students

110 48% 90 82% 20 18%

118 52% 113 96% 5 4%

228 100% 203 89% 25 11%

(By state definition)

321,280 137,235 471,365 2,690

318,822 146,475 478,910 2,002

Title I allocation
All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free Lunch Program ^
(CCD, 1999–2000)

$38,952,103

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected & Delinquent, ED, 1999–2000)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 1998-1999)

Local 32%

0–34% 35–49%

409 159 114 142

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 1998: Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2000: Proficient level and above Basic level and above Grade 8

State 61% Federal 7%

50–74% 75 –100%
^ 64 schools did not report. KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a
# = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

28% 62% 24% 70%

31% 77% 26% 68%

92

Utah
Student Achievement 1999–2000
Elementary School
Utah End of Level Test Utah End of Level Test
Assessment State Definition of Proficient

See Below Score of >86% on CRTs

Middle School
Grade 6
Reading/LanguageArts
Minimal Mastery Partial Mastery Proficient 0 Nearmal Near Mastery Mastery

High School
Grade 11

Grade 4

Stanford Achievement Test, Version 9 Reading/LanguageArts
Minimal Mastery Partial Mastery Proficient 0 Near Mastery Mastery

Reading/LanguageArts
Proficient 0 Students in: Minimal Mastery Partial Mastery Near Mastery Mastery

Students in:

All Schools Title I Schools High Poverty Schools

2% 3 6

19% 24 35

35% 36 34

43% 36 25

All Schools Title I Schools High Poverty Schools

1% 1 1

29% 39 50

32% 31 28

39% 29 20

Students in:

All Schools Title I Schools High Poverty Schools Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

10 % 24 25

55% 62 67

29% 13 8

6% 1 *

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

7 11 10

44 43 45

36 40 28

13 6 17

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

1 2 4

27 66 71

32 23 17

40 7 9

24 28 21

60 60 60

13 12 16

3 * 6

Mathematics
Proficient 0 Students in: Minimal Mastery Partial Mastery Near Mastery Mastery

Mathematics
Students in: Minimal Mastery Partial Mastery Near Mastery Proficient 0 Mastery

Utah End of Level Test—Grade 10
Mathematics
Minimal Mastery Partial Mastery Proficient 0 Near Mastery Mastery

All Schools Title I Schools High Poverty Schools Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

1% 1 3

30% 35 48

20% 20 20

48% 43 29

All Schools Title I Schools High Poverty Schools Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

2% 3 5

38% 46 59

25% 24 18

35% 27 18

Students in:

All Schools Title I Schools High Poverty Schools Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

10% 24 25

55% 62 67

29% 13 8

6% 2 *

3 5

58 56

18 17

21 22

5 4

66 70

17 17

12 8

24 28 21

60 60 60

13 12 16

3 * 3

Student achievement trend

Student achievement trend

Math 8th grade meets or exceeds Level III

Math 8th grade meets or exceeds Level III

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD,event)
1993-94 1998-99

4%
1994-95

5%
1998-99

Postsecondary enrollment
(IPEDS, High school grads enrolled in college)

15,071 57%

13,451 43%

* — n/a # High Poverty Schools KEY: KEY: KEY:

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% students receiving free/reduced lunch

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M AT I O N ,

R E F E R T O

S O U R C E S,

P A G E

1 0 6

93