Michigan

http://www.mde.state.mi.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 1999-2000)

$8,110 737 180

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2000-01)

Number of Charter Schools
(CCD, 2000-01)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 1,878 535 544 53 3,010

2000-01 2,114 632 666 135 3,547

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 35,271 15,166 20,569 1,058 72,064

2000-01 43,859 19,933 25,244 2,509 91,545

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 English Math Science Social Studies Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 1999-2000)

1994 67% 61 73 88

2000 64% 68 72 66

Michigan

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 11,704 1,106,414 423,081 1,529,495

2000-01 14,854 1,175,774 484,409 1,660,183

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2000-01 1% 2 20 4 74 2000-01 11% 2000-01 3%

1% 1 17 2 78 1993-94 9% 1993-94 3%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 1%

2000-01 1%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program*
(CCD, 2000-01)

*7 schools did not report.

Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Michigan

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
All students will read independently and use math to solve problems at grade level; experience a year of growth for a year of instruction; have an educational plan leading them to being prepared for success.

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Each school is required to develop a school improvement plan including goals based on academic objectives for all students and strategies to accomplish these goals. In development: all schools will be assigned an improvement target.

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Close gap for each school 10 percent between high and low performers.

Title I 2000-01
(ED Consolidated Report, 2000-01)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 738 34% 526 71% 605 82% $356,369,967

Targeted Assistance 1,407 66% 1,118 79% 997 71%

Total 2,145 100% 1,644 77% 1,602 75%

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-01)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2002 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2000 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 30% 65 29% 72 Grade 8 32% 77 29% 70

Michigan
Student Achievement 2000-01 Assessment:
Michigan Educational Assessment Program of Essential Skills.

State Definition of Proficient:
Satisfactory: Reading: at or above 300; Math: at or above 520.
Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Michigan

Elementary School
Grade 4 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 4 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Low 11% 12 26 Moderate 17% 18 25 Satisfactory 72% 70 49 Low 17% 19 35 Moderate 23% 24 27 Satisfactory 60% 58 38

35 34 41

30 37 26

35 30 33

19 19 29

25 29 27

55 52 43

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade meets or exceeds Satisfactory

Middle School
Grade 7 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Low 19% 24 44

Moderate 23% 25 28

Satisfactory 58% 51 28

38 38 45

26 26 27

36 37 28
= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

n/a # High Poverty Schools

Michigan

Grade Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

High School
Grade Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

High School Indicators High school dropout rate
(CCD, event)

1993-94 n/a 1994-95 60%

2000-01 n/a 2000-01 55%

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies