North Carolina

http://www.dpi.state.nc.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 1999-2000)

$6,045 120 90

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2000-01)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2000-01)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 1,165 401 304 24 1,894

2000-01 1,297 447 336 75 2,155

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 34,008 15,990 18,645 963 69,606

2000-01 42,707 19,892 22,531 1,477 86,607

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 English Math Science Social Studies Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 1999-2000)

1994 87% 79 73 88

2000 81% 64 75 93

North Carolina

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 8,469 798,816 305,060 1,103,876

2000-01 8,722 936,702 348,168 1,284,870

American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

1993-94 2% 1 30 1 66 1993-94 11% 1993-94 1%

2000-01 1% 2 31 4 61 2000-01 11% 2000-01 4%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 1%

2000-01 2%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program* (CCD, 2000-01)

*283 schools did not report.

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
Sixty percent students at or above grade level in reading, writing and math (grades 3-8); and 60 percent in reading, writing, math, science and social studies (grades 9-12).

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Annual growth/gain over a baseline set for each school.

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Meet growth expectations and 50 percent students at grade level, or above 60 percent at grade level without growth.

Title I 2000-01
Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

(ED Consolidated Report, 2000-01)

Schoolwide Programs 674 66% 592 88% 4 1% $163,037,646

Targeted Assistance 352 34% 329 93% 2 1%

Total 1,026 100% 921 90% 6 1%

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-01)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2002 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2000 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 32% 62 28% 76 Grade 8 31% 76 30% 70

North Carolina
Student Achievement 2000-01 Assessment:
North Carolina End of Grade or End of Course Test.

State Definition of Proficient:
Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Level III--mastery of grade level subject matter and skills and are prepared for next grade level.

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Elementary School
Grade 4 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 4 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Level I 1% 2 2 Level II 12% 17 21 Level III 47% 53 56 Level IV 40% 29 21 Level I 6% 9 11 Level II 19% 25 31 Level III 43% 45 44 Level IV 31% 21 14

15 12 21

38 37 35

41 43 35

6 8 9

2 3 4

23 21 28

58 57 51

17 19 17

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade meets or exceeds Level III

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

Middle School
Grade 8 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Level I 5% 8 10 Level II 15% 21 25 Level III 37% 42 43 Level IV 43% 30 21 Level I 2% 3 5 Level II 14% 21 28 Level III 44% 49 50 Level IV 39% 27 18

11 3 13

40 24 39

43 48 38

6 24 10

15 7 21

31 21 35

38 41 33

16 31 11

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade meets or exceeds Level III

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

North Carolina

High School
Grade 9 Reading (English I) Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 9 Mathematics (Algebra I) Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Level I 3% 5 3 Level II 21% 27 21 Level III 45% 36 50 Level IV 31% 32 26 Level I 8% 21 32 Level II 24% 37 37 Level III 40% 33 27 Level IV 28% 10 4

30 31 32

42 31 42

25 32 21

4 6 5

5 4 11

34 21 41

43 50 38

18 26 10

High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

1993-94 n/a 1994-95 51%

2000-01 6% 2000-01 65%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies