Texas

http://www.tea.state.tx.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 1999-2000)

$6,288 1,041 201

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2000-01)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2000-01)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 3,366 1,293 1,056 348 6,063

2000-01 3,789 1,512 1,366 806 7,473

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 108,043 50,827 55,763 6,806 221,439

2000-01 127,034 62,706 71,989 8,454 270,183

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 English Math Science Social Studies Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 1999-2000)

1994 71% 65 70 67

2000 64% 57 57 60

Texas

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 120,446 2,560,607 927,209 3,487,816

2000-01 145,771 2,797,276 1,116,572 3,913,848

American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

1993-94 * 2% 14 36 48 1993-94 11% 1993-94 12%

2000-01 * 3% 14 41 42 2000-01 11% 2000-01 14%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 3%

2000-01 5%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program* (CCD, 2000-01)

*151 schools did not report.

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Texas

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
Above 50 percent passing on assessment for all racial and ethnic groups and low-income students. (Pass=70 percent correct in reading and math).

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Pass rate increases 5 percent per year for each group.

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2000-01
(ED Consolidated Report, 2000-01)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 3,864 87% 3,581 93% 107 3%

Targeted Assistance 583 13% 505 87% 14 2%

Total 4,447 100% 4,086 92% 121 3%

$743,578,698

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-01)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2002 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2000 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Grade 4 28% 62 27% 77 Grade 8 30% 73 25% 69

Texas
Student Achievement 2000-01 Assessment:
Texas Assessment of Academic Skills.

State Definition of Proficient:
Score of 70 or above on Texas Learning Index.
Key n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Texas

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Texas

Elementary School
Grade 4 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 4 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Partially Proficient 9% 11 15 Proficient 84% 84 82 Advanced 7% 5 3 Partially Proficient 9% 12 16 Proficient 55% 59 62 Advanced 36% 30 23

26 18 15

62 65 62

12 17 22

19 14 15

79 83 81

2 3 4

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Texas

Middle School
Grade 8 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Partially Proficient 7% 11 14 Proficient 82% 82 81 Advanced 11% 8 5 Partially Proficient 8% 11 15 Proficient 66% 70 73 Advanced 26% 19 12

40 19 24

58 73 69

2 9 7

29 16 23

70 80 75

2 4 2

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Texas

High School
Grade 10 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 10 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Partially Proficient 10% 14 17 Proficient 81% 80 79 Advanced 9% 6 4 Partially Proficient 9% 14 18 Proficient 72% 73 72 Advanced 19% 13 10

51 25 34

48 69 63

1 6 4

35 20 37

64 77 62

1 6 1

High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

1993-94 n/a 1994-95 50%

2000-01 4% 2000-01 53%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies