Utah

http://www.usoe.k12.ut.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 1999-2000)

$4,378 40 8

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2000-01)

Number of Charter Schools
(CCD, 2000-01)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 431 114 101 7 653

2000-01 467 129 158 12 766

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 9,826 4,279 4,621 29 18,755

2000-01 11,185 4,530 5,348 165 21,228

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 English Math Science Social Studies Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 1999-2000)

1994 73% 55 66 61

2000 63% 63 83 72

Utah

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 2,690 321,280 137,235 458,515

2000-01 2,252 320,634 143,721 464,355

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2000-01 2% 3 1 9 86 2000-01 10% 2000-01 9%

1% 2 1 5 92 1993-94 10% 1993-94 5%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 *

2000-01 1%

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program*
(CCD, 2000-01)

*52 schools did not report.

Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Utah

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
School accreditation process, district accountability reporting.

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Not by state.

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Meet state average at Basic or higher level or increase 3 percent per year at Basic level or higher on assessments.

Title I 2000-01
(ED Consolidated Report, 2000-01)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 126 58% 106 84% 19 15% $38,550,414

Targeted Assistance 93 42% 88 95% 5 5%

Total 219 100% 194 89% 24 11%

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-01)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2002 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2000 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 32% 68 24% 70 Grade 8 32% 75 26% 68

Utah
Student Achievement 2000-01 Assessment:
Grade 4: Utah Criterion Reference Test Grade 8, 11 Reading: Stanford Achievement Test-9th Ed. Grade 8, 10 Mathematics: Utah Criterion Reference Test.

State Definition of Proficient:
Score of at least 86%.

Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Utah

Elementary School
Grade 4 Utah Criterion Reference Test Reading/Language Arts Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 4 Utah Criterion Reference Test Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Level 1 1% 1 1 Level 2 27% 31 42 Level 3 20% 20 21 Level 4 53% 48 36 Level 1 2% 3 4 Level 2 17% 22 30 Level 3 34% 36 36 Level 4 48% 40 31

5 6 9

41 44 40

37 38 31

17 13 20

2 0 3

52 52 52

22 17 18

25 31 28

Middle School
Grade 8 Stanford Achievement Test-9th Ed. Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Level 1 52% 61 81 Level 2 12% 9 7 Level 3 32% 26 11 Level 4 4% 4 1

85 90 90

5 1 3

9 8 6

* 1 1

Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Utah

Grade 8 Utah Criterion Reference Test Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Level 1 3% 8 10 Level 2 31% 39 52 Level 3 43% 37 30 Level 4 23% 16 8

13 12 15

58 58 57

23 25 23

6 6 5

High School
Grade 11 Stanford Achievement Test-9th Ed. Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 10 Utah Criterion Reference Test Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools High poverty Schools Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Level 1 11% 18 17 Level 2 53% 63 60 Level 3 29% 17 18 Level 4 7% 2 5 Level 1 50% 87 94 Level 2 10% 5 3 Level 3 35% 7 3 Level 4 5% 1 0

83 93 91

4 0 4

12 7 5

1 0 *

27 30 18

55 56 61

15 7 20

3 7 2

Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Utah

High School Indicators High school dropout rate
(CCD, event)

1993-94 3% 1994-95 56%

2000-01 4% 2000-01 38%

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies