Arizona

Arizona
http://www.ade.state.az.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$5,278 333 364

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 710 187 154 10 1,061

2001-02 996 239 356 125 1,716

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 20,011 6,453 8,633 75 35,172

2001-02 25,834 8,072 11,299 354 45,559

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 65% 61 73 65 2000 52% 49 66 75

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Arizona

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 3,164 519,054 182,737 701,791

2001-02 6,624 657,325 249,920 907,245

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 7% 2 5 35 51 2001-02 9% 2000-01 15%

7% 2 4 28 60 1993-94 9% 1993-94 12%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2%

2001-02 3%
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Arizona

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program (CCD, 2001-02) Data Not Available

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Grade level meets one year academic growth (50th percentile). Expected School Improvement on Assessment Grade level score greater than 40 percent of state schools in growth (three year average). Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Transition: Gap-reduction toward 90 percent Proficient and no students Below Basic (reading, math).

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 568 58% 391 57% 277 69% $153,016,312

Targeted Assistance 409 28% 290 43% 126 31%

Total 977 100% 681 70% 403 41%

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above
Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Grade 8 25%

23%

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Arizona

Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above

54 25% 70

66 21% 62

Arizona
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Arizona's Instrument to Measure Standards. State Definition of Proficient: Meets performance standard. Elementary School Grade 3 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 3 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Falls Far Below Approaching Proficient Meets Exceeds Falls Far Below Approaching Proficient Meets Exceeds

23%

27%

38%

12%

24 25 33

32 28 24

36
38 33

8
9 10

24%

37%

28%

12%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Arizona

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

25
17 34

39
40 34

27
28 22

9
15 10

Middle School Grade 8 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Falls Far Below Approaching Proficient Meets Exceeds Falls Far Below Approaching Proficient Meets Exceeds

44%

24%

26%

5%

60
53 56

24
24 22

15
20 19

1
3 3

63%

30%

5%

2%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Arizona

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

75 75

23 21

2 4

1 1

High School Grade 10 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 10 Mathematics Students in:
Falls Far Below Approaching Proficient Meets Exceeds Falls Far Below Approaching Proficient Meets Exceeds

30%

33%

32%

5%

40 33 44

39 35 34

20 30 20

2 3 2

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Arizona

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment

73%

14%

10%

2%

79 77 86

12 14 9

8 8 4

1 2 1

1993-94
14%

2000-01
11%

1994-95
44%
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

2000-01
50%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies