California

California
http://www.cde.ca.gov

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$6,987 988 350

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 4,920 1,095 812 39 6,866

2001-02 5,493 1,282 1,707 414 8,896

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 113,638 39,438 51,211 1,713 206,001

2001-02 159,344 50,238 73,332 9,621 292,535

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 76% 50 62 77 2000 68% 57 77 84

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

California

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 61,281 3,772,731 1,393,530 5,166,261

2001-02 4,329,008 1,745,295 6,074,303

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 1% 11 8 44 35 2001-02 9% 2000-01 25%

1% 11 9 37 42 1993-94 9% 1993-94 23%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 4%

2001-02 7%
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

California

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

†64 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
Academic Performance Index (API) of 800 on a scale of 200 to 1,000.

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Annual growth target of 5 percent of distance from base API to 800 with comparable improvement by ethnic and socioeconomically disadvantaged student subgroups.

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement

Schoolwide Programs 2,718 49% 1,282 56% 718 71%

Targeted Assistance 2,886 28% 1,027 44% 291 29%

Total 5,604 100% 2,309 41% 1,009 18%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

California

Title I Allocation

$1,340,360,020

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 21% 49 Grade 8 22% 61

25% 67

21% 55

California Student Achievement 2001-02
Assessment: California Standards Tests State Definition of Proficient: Proficient performance in relation to the academic content standards tested. Elementary School Grade 4 English Language Arts Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Prof. Adv.

11 16

19 26

35 38

22 15

14

4

23
27

32
29

35
28

8
11

2 5

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

California

Grade 4 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Prof. Adv.

7% 10

26% 35

30% 31

24% 18

13%
6

12

40

30

14

4

21

39

22

12

6

Student Achievement Trend English/Language Arts 4th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Middle School Grade 8 English Language
Key n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

California

Arts Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Prof. Adv.

14% 23

19% 27

34% 36

22% 12

10%
2

36

34

26

3

*

49

28

17

4

1

Grade 8 Algebra I Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 10 English Language Arts Students in: All schools
Key

Far Below Basic

Below Basic

Basic

Prof.

Adv.

13% 18

33% 34

34% 29

18% 16

2%
4

26

38

21

10

4

33

39

15

10

3

High School

Far Below Basic

Below Basic

Basic

Prof.

Adv.

16%

21%

30%
n/a #

21%

12%

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

California

Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities Grade 10 Algebra I Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

25

30

29

11

3

39

38

19

3

*

53

30

13

3

1

Far Below Basic

Below Basic

Basic

Prof.

Adv.

19% 22

41% 44

31% 27

8% 6

1%
*

23

44

26

6

1

33

46

18

3

*

1993-94
n/a

2000-01
n/a

1994-95
61%

2000-01
48%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies