California

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.cde.ca.gov
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$6,987 988

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 2001-02 61,281 — 3,772,731 4,329,008 1,393,530 1,745,295 5,166,261 6,074,303
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 4,920 Elementary 1,095 Middle 812 High 39 Combined 6,866 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 5,493 1,282 1,707 414 8,896 2001-02 159,344 50,238 73,332 9,621 292,535
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives 1% 11 Asian/Pacific Islander 9 Black 37 Hispanic 42 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1% 11 8 44 35 — 2001-02 9% 2001-02 7%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 23%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 25%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 64 schools did not report.

3,578 1,144 1,992 2,136

Local 30%

Federal 8% State 62%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

20

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 76% 68% English 50 57 Math 62 77 Science 77 84 Social Studies

1993-94 4%

1993-94 113,638 39,438 51,211 1,713 206,000
○ ○ ○

1993-94 9%

350

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Academic Performance Index (API) of 800 on a scale of 200 to 1,000. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Annual growth target of 5 percent of distance from base API to 800 with comparable improvement by ethnic and socioeconomically disadvantaged student subgroups. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

2,718 2,886 5,604 49% 51% 100% 1,282 1,027 2,309 Schools meeting AYP goal 56% 44% 41% 291 1,009 Schools in need of improvement 718 71% 29% 18%
Number of schools

Title I allocation

$1,340,360,020

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

21% 49

22% 61

25% 67

21% 55

California
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

California Standards Tests. Proficient performance in relation to the academic content standards tested.

Elementary School
Grade 4
English/Language Arts
Students in: Below Basic Basic All Schools 11% 19% Title I Schools Economically 16 26 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 23 Migratory Students Students with Disabilities 27
Far Below Basic
Proficient 0

○ ○

English/Language Arts
Students in: Below Basic Basic All Schools 14% 19% Title I Schools Economically 23 27 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 36 Migratory Students Students with Disabilities 49
Far Below Basic
Proficient 0

○ ○

Grade 8
Prof. Adv.

○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 10
English/Language Arts
Students in: Below Basic Basic All Schools 16% 21% Title I Schools Economically 25 30 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 39 Migratory Students Students with Disabilities 53
Far Below Basic
Proficient 0

○ ○

○ ○

○○

○○

35% 38

22% 15

14% 4

34% 36

22% 12

10% 2

Prof.

Adv.

Prof.

Adv.

30% 29

21% 11

12% 3

○○

○○

○○

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

32 29

35 28

8 11

2 5

34 28

26 17

3 4

* 1

38 30

19 13

3 3

* 1

Grade 4
Mathematics
Students in: Below Basic Basic All Schools 7% 26% Title I Schools Economically 10 35 Disadvantaged Students
Far Below Basic
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Algebra I
Students in: Below Basic Basic All Schools 13% 33% Title I Schools Economically 18 34 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 26 Migratory Students Students with Disabilities 33
Far Below
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 10
Algebra I
Students in: Below Basic Basic All Schools 19% 41% Title I Schools Economically 22 44 Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency 23 Migratory Students Students with Disabilities 33
Far Below
Proficient 0

Prof.

Adv.

Basic

Prof.

Adv.

Basic

Prof.

Adv.

30% 31

24% 18

13% 6

34% 29

18% 16

2% 4

31% 27

8% 6

1% *

Students with Limited English Proficiency 12 40 30 14 Migratory Students Students with Disabilities 21 39 22 12 Student Achievement Trend English/Language Arts 4th grade meets or exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0 2001
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

6

39

15

10

3

4

38

21

10

4

44 46

26 18

6 3

1 *

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

n/a
1994-95

n/a
2000-01

33

36

2002

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

61%

48%

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

21