Colorado

Colorado
http://www.cde.state.co.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$6,567 180 86

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 817 246 244 13 1,320

2001-02 942 286 316 70 1,614

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 16,771 7,267 8,683 111 32,832

2001-02 21,849 9,047 11,539 1,152 43,587

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 91% 65 78 61 2000 80% 68 72 88

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Colorado

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 7,249 451,469 164,260 615,729

2001-02 19,334 509,563 212,786 722,349

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 1% 3 6 23 67 2001-02 9% 2000-01 8%

1% 2 5 17 74 1993-94 9% 1993-94 4%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Migratory students
Key * — = Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

1993-94

2001-02
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Colorado
(OME)

1%

4%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Colorado

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program† (CCD, 2001-02)

†1 school did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Every child must gain a minimum of one academic year each year for math and reading. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Not available. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Reduce difference between base index and 100 by 7 percent annually (reading, math).

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation
Key * —

Schoolwide Programs 235 43% 176 38% 59 70% $89,132,150

Targeted Assistance 312 28% 287 62% 25 30%

Total 547 100% 463 85% 84 15%

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Colorado
(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 37% 70 34% 77 Grade 8 26% 78 35% 74

Colorado
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Colorado Student Assessment Program. State Definition of Proficient: Proficient: Students understand directions, recognize author's point of view, explain reactions, define problems or solutions, make predictions and draw conclusions, differentiate among printed materials, discriminate among various media, extract information from complex stimulus, identify character's reactions or motives, identify sequences, support opinions, classify familiar vocabulary, and interpret poetry in a concrete manner. Elementary School Grade 4 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with
Key

No Score

Unsatisfactor y

Part. Proficient

Proficient

Advanced

1% 2

13% 24

24% 33

55% 39

6% 2

6 4

42 47

34 28
n/a # High Poverty Schools

17 20

0

1

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Colorado

Disabilities

Grade 5 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
No Score Unsatisfactor y Part. Proficient Proficient

Advanced 20% 9

2% 3

12% 21

31% 40

35% 27

10 10

26 35

40 35

21 14

4 3

Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Middle School Grade 8 Reading Students in:
Key

No Score

Unsatisfactor

Part.

Proficient

Advanced

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Colorado
y Proficient

All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

4% 7

11% 25

20% 35

57% 32

8% 1

20 11

42 43

26 28

12 17

0

1

Grade 8 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
No Score Unsatisfactor y Part. Proficient Proficient Advanced

4% 7

26% 52

31% 29

26% 10

13% 2

19 10

55 64

21 18

5 6

1 1

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Colorado

High School Grade 10 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
No Score Unsatisfactor y Part. Proficient Proficient Advanced

4% 9

10% 21

21% 32

57% 36

8% 2

26 15

28 41

30 29

15 14

1 0

Grade 10 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
No Score Unsatisfactor y Part. Proficient Proficient Advanced

5% 10

31% 55

37% 26

24% 9

3% 0

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Colorado

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

27 14

53 67

16 15

15 3

0 0

1993-94
n/a

2000-01
n/a

1994-95
52%

2000-01
53%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies