Colorado

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.cde.state.co.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$6,567 180

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 7,249 451,469 164,260 615,729
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 19,334 509,563 212,786 722,349
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

1993-94 817 246 244 13 1,320
(CCD)

2001-02 942 286 316 70 1,614 2001-02 21,849 9,047 11,539 1,152 43,587
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives 1% 2 Asian/Pacific Islander 5 Black 17 Hispanic 74 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1% 3 6 23 67 — 2001-02 9% 2001-02 4%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 4%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 8%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 1 school did not report.

989 264 273 103

Federal 6% State 42%

Local 53%

Intermediate *

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

22

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 91% 80% English 65 68 Math 78 72 Science 61 88 Social Studies

1993-94 1%

1993-94 16,771 7,267 8,683 111 32,832
○ ○ ○

1993-94 9%

86

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Every child must gain a minimum of one academic year each year for math and reading. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Not available. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Reduce difference between base index and 100 by 7 percent annually (reading, math).

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

235 43% 176 Schools meeting AYP goal 38% Schools in need of improvement 59 70%
Number of schools

312 57% 287 62% 25 30%

547 100% 463 85% 84 15%

Title I allocation

$89,132,150

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

37% 70

26% 78

34% 77

35% 74

Colorado
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Colorado Student Assessment Program. See Appendix A.

Elementary School
Grade 4
Reading Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities
No Score Unsatisfactory Part. Proficient Proficient 0 Prof. Adv.

○ ○

Reading Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
No Score Unsatisfactory Part. Proficient Proficient 0 Prof. Adv.

○ ○ ○

Grade 8

○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 10
Reading Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
No Score Unsatisfactory Part. Proficient Proficient 0 Prof. Adv.

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○○

○○

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

Grade 5
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
No Score Unsatisfactory Part. Proficient Proficient 0 Prof. Adv.

Grade 8
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
No Score Unsatisfactory Part. Proficient Proficient 0 Prof. Adv.

6 4

42 47

34 28

17 20

0 1

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students 20 Students with Disabilities 11

1% 2

13% 24

24% 33

55% 39

6% 2

○○

4% 7

11% 25

20% 35

57% 32

8% 1

4% 9

10% 21

21% 32

57% 36

8% 2

○○

○ ○ ○

42 43

26 28

12 17

0 1

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students 26 Students with Disabilities 15

28 41

30 29

15 14

1 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 10
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
No Score Unsatisfactory Part. Proficient Proficient 0 Prof. Adv.

2% 3

12% 21

31% 40

35% 27

20% 9

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students 10 26 40 Students with Disabilities 10 35 35 Student Achievement Trend Reading 4th grade meets or exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

21 14

4 3

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students 19 55 21 Students with Disabilities 10 64 18 Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade meets or exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0 2000 2001 2002 33 37 39

4% 7

26% 52

31% 29

26% 10

13% 2

5% 10

31% 55

37% 26

24% 9

3% 0

○ ○ ○

5 6

1 1

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students 27 Students with Disabilities 14

53 67

16 15

4 3

0 0

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

57 34

60

63

61

n/a
1994-95

n/a
2000-01

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

52%

53%

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

23