Delaware

Delaware
http://www.doe.state.de.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$8,958 19 10

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 86 41 27 17 171

2001-02 102 46 30 8 186

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 2,429 1,741 1,452 280 5,902

2001-02 3,133 1,783 2,153 62 7,131

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 90% # 82 77 2000 61% 74 68 n/a

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Delaware

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 565 76,052 28,930 104,982

2001-02 586 80,674 34,229 114,903

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 * 2% 31 7 60 2001-02 11% 2000-01 2%

* 2% 29 3 66 1993-94 11% 1993-94 1%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Delaware

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 1% 1% All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program (CCD, 2001-02)

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Meet or exceed the Commendable rating (combines: absolute score, improvement score, and distributional or low achieving performance). Expected School Improvement on Assessment Schools meet or exceed their absolute, improvement, and distributional targets in the next measurement cycle. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2001-02

(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement Title I Allocation

Schoolwide Programs 36 34% 30 32% 9 43% $24,525,970

Targeted Assistance 70 28% 63 68% 12 57%

Total 106 100% 93 88% 21 20%

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-2002)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Delaware

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 33% 71 31% 81 Grade 8 31% 77 25% 68

Delaware
Student Achievement 2001-02 Assessment: Delaware Student Testing Program. State Definition of Proficient: Meets the standard--very good performance. Elementary School Grade 3 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Well Below Below Meets Exceeds Distinguishe d

9% 14 16

12% 18 18

51% 54 53

15% 9 8

14% 6 4

13 40

14 18

58 37

10 4

5 2

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Delaware

Grade 3 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Well Below Below Meets Exceeds

Distinguish ed 7% 2 2

11% 15 19

17% 25 24

46% 47 45

19% 12 10

15 38

19 25

45 31

14 6

6 1

Student Achievement Trend Reading 3rd grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Middle School Grade 8 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools
Key

Well Below

Below

Meets

Exceeds

Distinguishe d

11% 16

17% 21

61% 55
n/a #

7% 6

4% 2

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Delaware

Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

21

25

50

3

1

30 49

33 29

32 22

3 0

2 0

Grade 8 Math Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Well Below Below Meets Exceeds Distinguishe d

27% 34 44

25% 25 29

31% 29 22

8% 6 3

9% 6 2

47 73

21 19

23 7

2 1

6 0

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Delaware

High School Grade 10 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Well Below Below Meets Exceeds Distinguishe d

17% 18 33

17% 31 23

62% 51 43

3% 0 1

2% 0 0

46 69

22 18

32 14

0 0

0 0

Grade 10 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
Well Below Below Meets Exceeds Distinguishe d

30% 34 52

27% 42 27

26% 22 17

6% 2 3

11% 1 3

54 80

19 14

17 6

1 0

9 1

1993-94
5%

2000-01
4%

1994-95
Key

2000-01
n/a # High Poverty Schools = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

Delaware

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

65%

60%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies