Florida

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.flboe.org
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) 1993-94 34,793 Pre-K K-8 1,480,401 525,569 9-12 Total (K-12) 2,005,970
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$6,170 67

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

2001-02 57,038 1,740,376 703,064 2,443,440
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

1993-94 1,472 384 264 218 2,338
(CCD)

2001-02 1,773 491 409 632 3,305 2001-02 67,664 26,159 32,386 9,458 135,667
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives * 2% Asian/Pacific Islander 25 Black 14 Hispanic 60 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 * 2% 25 20 52 — 2001-02 13% 2001-02 3%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 6%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 11%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 12 schools did not report.

1,180 564 929 629

Federal 9% Local 42%

State 49%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

30

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 83% 86% English 76 67 Math 52 69 Science 86 96 Social Studies

1993-94 2%

1993-94 55,831 19,248 20,873 8,507 104,459
○ ○ ○

1993-94 12%

187

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Under the A+ Plan: For C grade: 60 percent of students at Level 2 (FCAT reading, math); Writing: 50 percent at Level 3 for elementary, 67 percent for middle school, 75 percent for high school. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Attain grade A/B: increase by 2 percent the number of students at Level 3 (FCAT). Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Transition: High School: more than 85 percent pass language arts, 80 percent pass math, 67 percent pass writing. Middle School: more than 40 percent over 50th percentile. Elementary school: more than 33 percent over 50th percentile.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

1,110 91% 923 Schools meeting AYP goal 91% 0 Schools in need of improvement —
Number of schools

110 1,220 9% 100% 91 1,014 9% 83% 0 0 — —

Title I allocation

$448,602,730

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

32% 63

26% 67

31% 76

23% 61

Florida
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test. See Appendix A.

Elementary School
Grade 4
Reading
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Reading
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 10
Reading
Proficient 0

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

Students in:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Students in:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Students in:

○○

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

All Schools 30% Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

○○

○○

○○

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

15%

28%

21%

6%

All Schools 29% Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students

26%

28%

14%

3%

All Schools 32% Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

33%

21%

8%

7%

Grade 4
Mathematics
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Mathematics
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 10
Mathematics
Proficient 0

All Schools 26% Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

24%

32%

15%

4%

All Schools 25% Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

22%

31%

14%

8%

Students in:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Students in:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Students in:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

All Schools 19% Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

21%

25%

27%

8%

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

n/a
1994-95

4%
2000-01

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

49%

56%

KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

31