Illinois

Illinois
http://www.isbe.state.il.us

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

$7,643 895 23

Number of Districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number Schools

of

Charter

(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of Public Schools
(CCD)

Elementary Middle High Combined Total Number of FTE Teachers
(CCD)

1993-94 2,616 707 641 27 3,991

2001-02 2,634 729 756 135 4,254

Elementary Middle High Combined Total
(SASS)

1993-94 56,172 17,322 29,424 956 103,874

2001-02 65,509 21,600 35,560 2,113 124,782

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 1994 89% 82 77 80 2000 70% 65 93 90

English Math Science Social Studies

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Illinois

Sources of Funding District Average
(CCD, 2000-01)

Student Demographics
Public school enrollment
(CCD)

Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12) Race/ethnicity
(CCD)

1993-94 42,359 1,259,394 503,024 1,762,418

2001-02 57,550 1,423,829 585,396 2,009,225

1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Students with disabilities
(OSEP)

2001-02 * 3% 21 16 59 2001-02 12% 2000-01 7%

* 3% 21 11 65 1993-94 11% 1993-94 5%

Students with limited English proficiency
(ED/NCBE)

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Illinois

Migratory students
(OME)

1993-94 2001-02 * * All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program (CCD, 2001-02)

†371 schools did not report.

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year.)

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment
All student scores above the 50th percentile level for a school composite score.

Expected School Improvement on Assessment
Gains to meet 50th percentile in five years; currently working on changing the definition to meet the AYP requirements of NCLB.

Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools
Annual gain to 90 percent proficient by 2007.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Number of schools Schools meeting AYP Goal Schools identified for Improvement
Key

Schoolwide Programs 984 41% 326 20% 484 96%

Targeted Assistance 1,424 28% 1,267 80% 22 4%
n/a #

Total 2,408 100% 1,593 66% 506 21%

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Illinois

Title I Allocation

$380,502,220

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2000-2001)

NAEP State Results
Grade 4 Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above 31% 61 Grade 8 34% 76

33% 74

29% 66

Illinois Student Achievement 2001-02
Assessment: Illinois Standards Achievement Test. State Definition of Proficient: Meets Standards. Elementary School Grade 3 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Academic Warning Below Standards Meets Standards Exceeds Standards

7% 8 13

31% 35 47

44% 42 34

19% 15 6

16 10 21

47 29 47

32 39 26

6 22 6

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Illinois

Grade 3 Math Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Academic Warning Below Standards Meets Standards Exceeds Standards

7% 9 15

19% 22 31

44% 44 42

30% 25 12

12 7 19

28 18 29

45 37 39

15 39 13

Student Achievement Trend Reading 3rd grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Middle School Grade 8 Reading

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Illinois

Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities

Academic Warning

Below Standards

Meets Standards

Exceeds Standards

1% 1 2

31% 33 48

58% 49 47

10% 17 3

4 0 6

72 57 68

24 36 25

1 7 1

Grade 8 Math Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Academic Warning Below Standards Meets Standards Exceeds Standards

7% 5 13

40% 47 58

37% 41 25

15% 7 4

19 9 32

62 54 54

15 32 12

4 5 2

Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade meets or exceeds Proficient

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Illinois

High School Grade 11 Reading Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities
Academic Warning Below Standards Meets Standards Exceeds Standards

8% 10 17

34% 38 51

45% 41 30

13% 11 3

17 33 36

47 43 45

31 21 16

4 3 3

Grade 11 Mathematics Students in: All schools Title I schools Economically Disadvantaged Students
Academic Warning Below Standards Meets Standards Exceeds Standards

10% 14 24

36% 40 53

45% 39 23

8% 7 1

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies

Illinois

Students with limited English proficiency Migratory students Students with Disabilities High School Indicators High school dropout rate (CCD, event) Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school grads enrolled in college)

17 25 42

47 46 43

31 21 14

4 0 1

1993-94
7%

2000-01
6%

1994-95
64%

2000-01
60%

Key

* —

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable

n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Not available = Sample size too small to calculate = 75-100% students qualify for lunch subsidies