Indiana

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.doe.state.in.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$7,630 295

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 3,971 669,997 282,214 952,211
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 6,170 702,563 282,529 985,092
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 1,178 Elementary 291 Middle 340 High 28 Combined 1,837 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 1,160 326 343 59 1,888 2001-02 28,073 11,347 16,247 1,795 57,462
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives * 1% Asian/Pacific Islander 11 Black 2 Hispanic 86 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 * 1% 12 4 83 — 2001-02 13% 2001-02 2%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 1%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 2%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100% 141 323 264

1,156

Federal 5% State 54%

Intermediate 1%

Local 41%

KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a

40

#

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

^ 7 schools did not report.

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 76% 87% English 81 72 Math 78 77 Science 89 79 Social Studies

1993-94 1%

1993-94 25,645 9,848 15,889 974 52,356
○ ○ ○

1993-94 11%

0

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Sixty-six percent meet standard for math, language arts. Accreditation by state. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Gain 5 percent of students meeting standard per year. Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

168 21% 106 Schools meeting AYP goal 17% Schools in need of improvement 62 36%
Number of schools

640 79% 529 83% 111 64%

808 100% 635 79% 173 21%

Title I allocation

$141,330,341

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

33% 66

33% 77

35% 82

29% 72

Indiana
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress Plus. Student demonstrates mastery of standards.

Elementary School
Grade 3
Language Arts Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Did Not Pass 34% 37 49 Pass 66% 63 51

Grade 8
Language Arts Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Did Not Pass 32% 43 51 Pass 68% 57 49

○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School
Grade 10
Language Arts Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Did Not Pass 32% 60 55 Pass 68% 40 46

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

○○

○○

○○

○○

○○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

68

33

82

18

58

42

71

29

72 81

28 19

Grade 3
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Did Not Pass 30% 32 42 Pass 70% 68 58

Grade 8
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Did Not Pass 34% 46 55 Pass 66% 54 45

○ ○ ○ ○

Grade 10
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities Did Not Pass 35% 34 55 Pass 65% 66 42

49 58

51 42

66 78

34 22

67 76

33 24

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

n/a
1994-95

n/a
2000-01

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

55%

60%

KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

R E F E R

T O

S O U R C E S ,

P A G E

1 1 7

41