Maryland

School and Teacher Demographics
Per pupil expenditures
(CCD, 2000-01)

http://www.msde.state.md.us
Student Demographics
Public school enrollment (CCD) Pre-K K-8 9-12 Total (K-12)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Statewide Accountability Information
(Collected from states, January 2002 for 2001-02 school year)

$8,256 24

Number of districts
(CCD, 2001-02)

Number of charter schools
(CCD, 2001-02)

1993-94 17,984 544,839 197,072 741,911
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 20,314 587,816 246,807 834,623
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Number of public schools (CCD) 1993-94 832 Elementary 210 Middle 162 High 11 Combined 1,215 Total Number of FTE teachers Elementary Middle School High School Combined Total
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 868 240 202 20 1,330 2001-02 26,286 11,953 14,021 618 52,878
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Race/ethnicity (CCD) 1993-94 American Indian/Alaskan Natives * 4% Asian/Pacific Islander 34 Black 3 Hispanic 59 White — Other Students with disabilities (OSEP)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2001-02 * 5% 37 5 52 — 2001-02 10% 2001-02 *
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

(CCD)

Migratory students (OME)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with limited English proficiency (ED/NCBE)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

1993-94 2%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

2000-01 3%
○ ○ ○ ○ ○

All schools by percent of students eligible to participate in the Free and Reduced-Price Lunch Program^ (CCD, 2001-02)

Sources of funding
District average
(CCD, 2000-01)

0-34% 35-49% 50-74% 75-100%
^ 2 schools did not report.

781 182 232 143

Local 57% Federal 6%
KEY: * KEY: — KEY: n/a
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too small to calculate

State 37%

52

#

Percentage of teachers with a major in the main subject taught, grades 7-12 (SASS) 1994 2000 86% 71% English 73 68 Math 86 84 Science 92 91 Social Studies

1993-94 *

1993-94 22,194 9,525 10,839 417 42,975
○ ○ ○

1993-94 10%

Statewide Goal for Schools on State Assessment Seventy percent of students at satisfactory level (six subjects), 90 percent pass four functional tests. Expected School Improvement on Assessment Substantial and sustained progress in meeting performance standards annually (average for three years). Title I Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Schools Same as statewide goal.

Title I 2001-02
(ED Consolidated Report, 2001-02)

Schoolwide Targeted Total Programs Assistance

294 77% 190 Schools meeting AYP goal 73% Schools in need of improvement 91 83%
Number of schools

86 23% 72 27% 19 17%

380 100% 262 69% 110 29%

Title I allocation

$132,781,000

(Includes Basic, Concentration, and LEA grants, Capital Expenditures, Even Start, Migrant Education, and Neglected and Delinquent, ED, 2001-02)

NAEP State Results
Reading, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above Math, 2003 Proficient level and above Basic level and above
Grade 4 Grade 8

32% 62

31% 71

31% 72

30% 67

Maryland
Student Achievement 2001-02

Assessment State Definition of Proficient

Maryland School Performance Assessment Program. Proficient: A realistic and rigorous level of achievement indicating proficiency in meeting the needs of students.

Elementary School
Grade 3
Reading Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Partially Proficient 68% 78 83
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Reading Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Partially Proficient 75% 86 87
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Middle School

High School ^ ^
Grade
Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Proficient 28% 20 16

Advanced 4% 2 1

○○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○

Proficient 22% 13 12

Advanced 3% 1 1

○○

○○

○○

○○

○○

Grade 3
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Partially Proficient 71% 80 85
Proficient 0

Grade 8
Mathematics Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Partially Proficient 63% 83 82
Proficient 0

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

81 * 77

17 * 21

2 * 2

Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

87 * 95

12 * 5

1 * *

Grade
Students in:
All Schools Title I Schools Economically Disadvantaged Students Students with Limited English Proficiency Migratory Students Students with Disabilities

Proficient 27% 19 14

Advanced 2% 1 1

Proficient 28% 15 16

Advanced 9% 2 2

Students with Limited English Proficiency 85 14 Migratory Students * * Students with Disabilities 81 18 Student Achievement Trend Reading 3rd grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0
KEY: * — n/a # High Poverty Schools

1 * 1

Students with Limited English Proficiency 77 20 Migratory Students * * Students with Disabilities 91 8 Student Achievement Trend Mathematics 8th grade Meets or Exceeds Proficient
100 80 60 40 20 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 47 49 53 49 37

3 * 1

High School Indicators
High school dropout rate (CCD, event)
1993-94 2000-01

42

32

41

40

5%
1994-95

4%
2000-01

37

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
= Less than 0.5 percent = Not applicable = Not available = Sample size too few to calculate = 75-100% of students qualify for lunch subsidies

Postsecondary enrollment
(NCES, High school graduates enrolled in college)

55%

55%

^^

High school assessment results not available for 2001-02.
R E F E R T O S O U R C E S , P A G E 1 1 7

F O R

M O R E

I N F O R M A T I O N ,

53